EGYPT Unkown formation in the desert

[Sierra]

Posted by nomadguy (here)
Awhile back, I was listening to Robert Schoch speak about the sphynx and it's erosion.
I came up with an idea.
Upon examining the great pyramid and the channels inside. I had the thought that they were once filled with running water.
And that perhaps the capstone or top receptacle was made to spray or vaporize the water over the landscape or in another way, alter the atmosphere using the cumulative energy of the water flow underneath. Adding, that if water has memory and the ancients knew this... They might have created a way to not only move water around and purify it into "living water", but also to attract and perhaps control the skies-water flows by way of ionic attraction(electrostatic attraction).

Now after reading the above material it makes even more sense to me. Could it be that the whole of Northern Africa was forested and maintained via an aqueduct system that also created desirable weather patterns by way of ionic forces, thus sustaining and replenishing the entire cycle?

Then later on in it's history there was a cataclysm, breaking the system and draining it fairly rapidly IE Deluge. -just a thought, I am still playing with the idea.
Carry on ~

Thank You Kryder for sharing this information with the forum it has my head spinning!

I've heard the great Sahara desert indeed was a land of plenty at one point. The scuttle butt (unprovable of course) is that when the earth's pole was skewed slightly, creating the seasons we are all familiar with, the water of the Sahara went underground and the Sahara dried out.

The water is still there.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Manmade_River

Kryder I am so thrilled you joined Avalon! I've been obsessed with Ancient Egypt since I was in junior high school.

Sierra

[Flash]

The large underground aquafier was/is in Lybia, the clean, abundant, water that was planned by the Lybian regime to supply all of North Africa and good part of Africa in fresh vegetable and pure water. US has put their hand on it lately.

[observer]

Dr. Joseph P. Farrell, in his "Giza Death Star" Trilogy suggests that the Great Pyramid at Giza was the foundational structure for an hyperdimensional weapon, the high-tech components having been removed sometime in antiquity.

These new discoveries in the Western Desert would go a long way to validating those suggestions by Farrell. What KRYDER has discovered could be the remnants of advanced weapons systems, the very technology that was being sought by the Nazis, and has been further confiscated by the secret world government of contempory time.

I might note, the evidence found on the ground in Egypt is further supported by the evidence found strewn about the Solar System by Richard Hoagland of a clear indication for an advanced civilization sometime in antiquity.

At some point in great antiquity, there was a Cosmic War in which this planet, Planet Earth, was involved. Everything KRYDER has discovered goes further to support that thesis.

Thank you KRYDER for joining the forum and contributing.

Research Resources:

Dr. Joseph P. Farrell, "The Giza Death Star" -

http://books.google.com/books?id=nza...page&q&f=false

Dr. Joseph P. Farrell, "The Giza Death Star Deployed" -

http://books.google.com/books?id=1yP...page&q&f=false

Dr. Joseph P. Farrell, "The Giza Death Star Destroyed" -

http://books.google.com/books?id=_gc...page&q&f=false

Richard C. Hoagland, "Dark Mission" -

http://books.google.com/books?id=tBc...ed=0CDIQ6AEwAA

[Carmody]

The three Giza books are the only three I've not read of Joseph Farrell's works. I have one of them, but not the other two.

All that as a preface, I'm not so sure I'd specifically call the Giza pyramids and all other potential aspects that may unfold....as 'weapons'.

For in my estimation, that is far too large and broad of a brush, that is not possessing of enough balance, as projections go.

That kind of thinking, to my mind... pushes forth the idea of galactic death and destruction as a universal norm, which is not functional, at all, in the long run...by any idea of continuance of any kind.

'By and through constant War and Death, we shall live?'

I think not.

Therefore I will entertain the possibility that some aspects might be weapons or be capable of being used in the form of a 'weapon'..like my car, or a stick ---could be.

But built specifically and only as a weapon? No. Such thinking will not own my thoughts and ideas.

[observer]

Posted by Carmody (here)
Click-on forwarding Icon to see Carmody's comment #44

....But built specifically and only as a weapon? No. Such thinking will not own my thoughts and ideas.

I find it difficult to understand, Carmody, if as you say, you've read most of Farrell's work and, yet, you still don't agree with his thesis regarding a Cosmic War sometime in great antiquity.

The man has written extensively about the evidence for this finding. His work is meticulously researched. The evidence is presented in a clear and focused manner.

[Heather2017]

Hi observer. As I see it, we can accept there was a cosmic war without believing pyramids were built specifically and only as weapons.

[Carmody]

Posted by observer (here)

Posted by Carmody (here)
Click-on forwarding Icon to see Carmody's comment #44

....But built specifically and only as a weapon? No. Such thinking will not own my thoughts and ideas.

I find it difficult to understand, Carmody, if as you say, you've read most of Farrell's work and, yet, you still don't agree with his thesis regarding a Cosmic War sometime in great antiquity.

The man has written extensively about the evidence for this finding. His work is meticulously researched. The evidence is presented in a clear and focused manner.

- update -

I thought when I reviewed this thread, it appeared to be about objective evidence.

Not that I don't agree or that I disagree. I simply won't allow the swamp of negative casting of all things....to fill my mind. Joseph does not negative cast much of anything, if at all. He's very good at being balanced in his objectivity, and I have great respect for him and would travel hundreds of miles to hear him speak.

[observer]

Posted by Carmody (here)
[....snip]
Not that I don't agree or that I disagree. I simply won't allow the swamp of negative casting of all things....to fill my mind. Joseph does not negative cast much of anything, if at all. He's very good at being balanced in his objectivity, and I have great respect for him and would travel hundreds of miles to hear him speak.

Well.... the point of my comment #43:

Posted by observer (here)
Click-on forwarding icon to see the content of observer's comment #43.

.... was to advise KRYDER of Farrell's work.

Dr. Farrell has written three.... not one but three books in which he concludes the Great Pyramid at Giza (that specific pyramid) was an hyperdimensional weapon.

That theme runs through much of his work. I'm not clear on what particular Dr. Joseph Farrell you are reading.

[KRYDER]

Posted by Sierra (here)

Posted by nomadguy (here)
Awhile back, I was listening to Robert Schoch speak about the sphynx and it's erosion.
I came up with an idea.
Upon examining the great pyramid and the channels inside. I had the thought that they were once filled with running water.
And that perhaps the capstone or top receptacle was made to spray or vaporize the water over the landscape or in another way, alter the atmosphere using the cumulative energy of the water flow underneath. Adding, that if water has memory and the ancients knew this... They might have created a way to not only move water around and purify it into "living water", but also to attract and perhaps control the skies-water flows by way of ionic attraction(electrostatic attraction).

Now after reading the above material it makes even more sense to me. Could it be that the whole of Northern Africa was forested and maintained via an aqueduct system that also created desirable weather patterns by way of ionic forces, thus sustaining and replenishing the entire cycle?

Then later on in it's history there was a cataclysm, breaking the system and draining it fairly rapidly IE Deluge. -just a thought, I am still playing with the idea.
Carry on ~

Thank You Kryder for sharing this information with the forum it has my head spinning!

I've heard the great Sahara desert indeed was a land of plenty at one point. The scuttle butt (unprovable of course) is that when the earth's pole was skewed slightly, creating the seasons we are all familiar with, the water of the Sahara went underground and the Sahara dried out.

The water is still there.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Manmade_River

Kryder I am so thrilled you joined Avalon! I've been obsessed with Ancient Egypt since I was in junior high school.

Sierra

Hi Sierra, Thank you pleasure to be here.... And great input.

It is more than apparent that the entire area of North Africa was indeed temperate and forested and had been so for millions of years.... Something sure happened. If we go by the histories from the people of witnessed events as a whole, disregarding any modern interpretation, we see a world catastrophe took place resulting in a Deluge. After which much of the Earth never fully recovered and the first deserts appeared.

When we look at Sumerian engravings one thing we notice is the amount of Tree Ferns being depicted. Giving credence to the stories that much of the planet was fed water from Fog and ground level clouds and mists.

I also agree with the above that many diverse structural features were installed to maintain a moderate environment conducive to its cultures over all wellness.

Since we really have little idea what the region was like as a whole we can only assume they needed structures to make "mists" at all. Most evidence shows if we are looking pre 10,000 bc or so there would have been no need. That is not to say that these structures could have indeed "programmed" these condensing mists, controlling their crystal formation at the moment the form droplets. In that way all water that accumulated or fell as rain would have a structure conducive to life...

water for thought ~*

[KRYDER]

Posted by observer (here)

Posted by Carmody (here)
[....snip]
Not that I don't agree or that I disagree. I simply won't allow the swamp of negative casting of all things....to fill my mind. Joseph does not negative cast much of anything, if at all. He's very good at being balanced in his objectivity, and I have great respect for him and would travel hundreds of miles to hear him speak.

Dr. Farrell has written three.... not one but three books in which he concludes the Great Pyramid at Giza (that specific pyramid) was an hyperdimensional weapon.

That theme runs through much of his work. I'm not clear on what particular Dr. Joseph Farrell you are reading.

Hello, good discussion...

I hope this in no way sounds political or like entertaining the grey area.... But I really think both are right on here.... How?

We have recorded histories of the accounts for which we are now finding the evidence. In the case of Krishna for instance, he clearly had defensive weapons at his palace. But the "craft" that attacked his palace was able to dodge these with temporal changes. It portrays Krishna's defense consisting of missiles. The craft was using energy weapons and expressed little fear of being affected by the projectiles coming from the surface. One craft was able to destroy enough of his city and deplete his defensive weapon stockpiles until he had to "Leave the Earth". In this story, on the day following his departure, the entire Earth flooded.

This would be lore and legend had they not just found his palace and surrounding city off shore, under 170'+ of ocean. The city extends for 50km under the sea. What we see here is it was not the same for everyone regarding a basic need to defend at all. For instance if Krishna had a known threat he would have been prepared.

Pyramids existed all over the Earth and all had functions... many. The functions as diverse as the theories attributed to them. The great pyramid is different. It was/is all of the above and a message. To us, the people of "this" time... To learn and believe. To discover and maybe even save ourselves or at least some of us during this state of change.

It is a model of a planet, functioning as a rotating mass in time space without moving. It is a "well" in the unified field. Built to demonstrate all the things we now read into it. It is a double edged sword able to cut us all with either edge. It is the ultimate question and the ultimate answer. Because it has been left up to us which direction we wish to see, derive and manifest its secrets, the expressed loopholes in space time itself. Yes its a weapon ! Yes its a pump! Yes it helps life itself.....

The science portrayed is the secret of life, of reality itself. It tells of a power that is absolutely infinite and how to utilize this for all our needs. It physically demonstrates a working model for us to dis-engineer. And it was built partly for this purpose and thus contains and incorporates teaching aids and much excessive details. Of course their is no glyph s, the language was to be permanent as is the structure. "Do you speak math?" should be the only question. For that is the language being spoken and stored here. Their even exists a religious aspect as Einstein himself declared. This is because the problems / lessons , supersede technology good and bad, it goes beyond culture and society and try's to teach truth in the potential of man. Both his creative potential and the link of this to the universe and how they can work together... And as well the obvious choice he has once these secrets are revealed.... To cherish and benefit life or to fear and destroy it.

Personally I believe the Egyptian "system" we see today are pieces of both an old and new structures/ devices (pre 10,000 bc or after) that could and may indeed have been re built/ combined and used as weapons. This goes for South America. If we dug up a Tesla Tower tomorrow in a archaeological dig, a General would say its a weapon and a person of the humanities would see a new clean power source to save all. Both ARE absolutely right!!!

I would add their is much more to this "system" that just a weapons platform alone. Much more. I understand theories dedicated to one or another "single use" theory. But I will also add these insights are solely based on that persons research and or exposure to which ever pieces of a very scattered whole. On both what they know and that which they are un-aware of. Until EVERY piece fits we are not seeing the picture. So far not enough people have seen enough pieces together to "know".... I hope to plop many of these into the hands of all... I want to see how it goes then. Ive had many try to use my research and say one thing or another to push their "theory" further. Truth is what it is and will never fit everyone's theory any more than everyone is ready to accepts everyone else's.

Once more is seen. Once more is found it will become clear. Having a good understanding of things provides avenues for real discovery. The proof is in the pudding. The pudding is right here.

There much more to show, the theories will fly.... I am just trying to reveal one step at a time so people can see for themselves what this is and what it means. I have a clue and that has enabled me to find the clues and make the finds. And they will speak to the world themselves some time soon and I hope the meaning is as clear as it looks from here.

Thank you soooo much for the input.... Every bit of this is important!

[eni-al]

Someone knows its there or what it is, with the blast craters and the vehicle tracks, though they don't appear to be much different when looking at the imagery from 2006 to the latest, but hard to tell as the 2006 imagery is a bit washed out, but still, some don't appear to be any different, would expect many tracks to not be nearly as visible in the time passed, or messed up from vehicles running back over tracks, if anyone was still going there. Need to check any differences in craters.

Be better to see it on the ground, anything military would be clearly marked nearby, especially if its an area for any artillery training or such. Its only 10 miles from the main road, but nothing else really around of military nature, appears to be just civilian areas, you could probably fly over it.
While it could have some boring use with coincidences, could be something more. These kind of things I would love to get out to and see for myself, be on the forefront of some today's discoveries, still a lot of to be found across the world I'd bet.

[nomadguy]

The fact that the math involved in the great pyramid is so specific is fantastic, I think is a key.
How can any structure on the surface of our planet not move?
The surface of the earth stretches and moves all the time. For example in the town where I currently live. most of the town has moved 6 ft in only the last 100-150 years. So much that the property lines are all goofy.
*The pyramids are also scalable as a map of a certain cluster of stars.
So... If the pyramids were connected to forces from afar, like a star cluster or stellar arm of the milkyway galaxy through a "subtle" force.
And the distance between<< increases the amount of possible force(charge) you could potentially capture from the structure of the pyramid, then the amount of energy one could produce from it is truly beyond belief.
Adding that this "system" or structures must have been multi-use. And in possibly more creative ways than we might imagine.
Perhaps one of the functions was to fend of a recurrence of a great comet or cyclical asteroid threat. Or even invasion. Who knows... The vimana looking hieroglyphs have always interested me. I say lets find out! After all the REAL history of our race and this planet might be the most interesting and exciting thing we have going.

[onawah]

Kryder, are you aware of this Avalon thread?:
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...ggest-Pyramids
and a little bit more here:
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...mid#post521673
Welcome to Avalon, BTW!

[onawah]

More here as well:
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...593#post544593

[nomadguy]

Posted by onawah (here)
Kryder, are you aware of this Avalon thread?:
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...ggest-Pyramids
and a little bit more here:
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...mid#post521673
Welcome to Avalon, BTW!

Wow from the Bosnian Pyramids thread>



https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...304#post547304

Carry on ~

[KRYDER]

Posted by nomadguy (here)
The fact that the math involved in the great pyramid is so specific is fantastic, I think is a key.
How can any structure on the surface of our planet not move?
The surface of the earth stretches and moves all the time. .

The term "not move" was in regard to its relative position on the planet. Of course I realize their is movement, planetary rotation, our orbit around the sun, this making a spiral through space as our solar system swings in the arm in of the galaxy etc... As for that particular structure not moving and/ or the others we have mapped. And during the time in question, 35,000 years ago to present for the most part none of these relative positions have changed as they are on exact, to the foot placements. Mathematically it is the geographic center of all the land masses and the air force world map also places it at the center for this reason. I do not believe this is a coincidence in any way. For it also is a scale model for the upper hemisphere of our planet on which it sits. The scale, mass and as well the bulge from rotation are all accurate. So we are left to conclude this is what it was like when it was constructed or they knew what it would be like when we/ someone had the ability to accurately measure it.

Many areas have remained in situ for millions of years while many others moved. Your town may have moved and many do while many others do not. Eastern NM has not even shuddered a bit in over 400 million years, never tilted nor slid. But hit around Santa Rosa and that all changes for about 375 miles west... Then once again stable ground of exposed Triassic Period. The ones who constructed what we posted here understood this and placed things where they would stay to serve their purpose. I am not saying millions of years factoring in continental drift or anything....

Everyone for the most part is focusing on the structure posted above. This is a poor example having been unearthed and used as target practice. Someone removed the capstone and I can only imagine what else. Really since the beginning we have considered this may have been built early in the Utopian cult era from 1880 to 1930 by groups that eventually became the "9" and later, with today people like Dr B. It could have been unearthed by the Nazi's with an attempt to rebuild and use it....

There many others and many of those still completely buried. These others can be attributed to the "first time" and besides the last 3 images in the KX album, are waiting to be made public. The last image in the series that has concentric circles being the very most important. This needs to be examined by a real expedition! And whats around this area is mind blowing.

[KRYDER]

Posted by eni-al (here)
Someone knows its there or what it is, with the blast craters and the vehicle tracks, though they don't appear to be much different when looking at the imagery from 2006 to the latest, but hard to tell as the 2006 imagery is a bit washed out, but still, some don't appear to be any different, would expect many tracks to not be nearly as visible in the time passed, or messed up from vehicles running back over tracks, if anyone was still going there. Need to check any differences in craters.

Be better to see it on the ground, anything military would be clearly marked nearby, especially if its an area for any artillery training or such. Its only 10 miles from the main road, but nothing else really around of military nature, appears to be just civilian areas, you could probably fly over it.
While it could have some boring use with coincidences, could be something more. These kind of things I would love to get out to and see for myself, be on the forefront of some today's discoveries, still a lot of to be found across the world I'd bet.

Hi, yes there is much to reveal and even more out there to find. Have you seen the website and the rest of the images we have posted on the preliminary release on Egypt? This is a drop in the bucket... Just look at the math and its alignment with others sites, mainly the Osirion.

www.kryderexplorationllc.multiply.com

We are waiting for the right avenue to open that will allow a real unbiased and informed look! We have the equipment, the people and the contacts over there... Lets go!

[observer]

Posted by KRYDER (here)
Click on forwarding icon to see the content of KRYDER's comment #50

Thank you KRYDER for replying to my comment with the understanding you offered within your reply.

• There is no doubt pyramids, in general, had many uses.
• There is no doubt the Great Pyramid at Giza is a living message written in mathematics.
• There is also no doubt that the message one can decode from the math, and the hyperdimensional physics of this monument, points to a conclusion that the message contained within the context of the mathematics of that one specific pyramid - the Great Pyramid at Giza - can be, and was, weaponized.
  

This is the conclusion one must come to if a thorough investigation into the work of Peter Levenda, Jim Marrs, Richard Dolan, Richard C. Hoagland, or Dr. Joseph P. Farrell is pursued - all of whom have been interviewed by Bill Ryan.

The very significant point that I was attempting to make is:

That which you are discovering, hidden in the Western Desert, will lend foundational support to the theories of those whom I've already mentioned with regard to a great Cosmic War sometime in remote antiquity.

I'm certain that if you look at your discoveries with the understanding this entire Northern Africa area was once, at a time in great antiquity, nothing more than a military outpost for an advanced civilization of entities. The evidence will indicate these entities were using this planet to focus energies that resulted in the creation of the Asteroid Belt out of a planet that once existed at that location in our Solar System. (also see the work of Thomas C. Van Flandern)

This is the interpretation I have gleaned from many years of research into the various individuals.

Thank you for listening....

[Robert J. Niewiadomski]

Posted by KRYDER (here)
(...)Not to be mean but I have to add concerning Dr. B - When she stated the shape was not quite square and that it was different depending on how you looked at it... I laughed a little.... When she said that they had to haul in the helium for the hot air balloon I cried a little ..... because I was laughing so hard(...)

Flying hot air balloon over Sahara is different than flying hot air balloon over much colder climate. The reason is temperature difference between outside and the inside of the balloon. In colder climate you receive more lift as the colder air is more dense and displaces the ballon in the air with greater force. In Sahara where air is hot you have less difference in temperature and lesser displacing force. So you have to add some helium to the air inside of the ballon to gain some more lift...
Below are some pictures from Dr Boulter trip to the site:

In February 2012, Dr Carmen Boulter led an expedition into the Western Desert of Egypt in search of a new site. She found the coordinates on Google Earth, got permits from the Egyptian government to go into the restricted military zone, arranged for a hot air balloon, and brought a film crew and scientist.

More pictures here: http://www.pyramidcode.com/FiresideGallery/index.htm

[KRYDER]

Posted by Robert J. Niewiadomski (here)

Posted by KRYDER (here)
(...)Not to be mean but I have to add concerning Dr. B - When she stated the shape was not quite square and that it was different depending on how you looked at it... I laughed a little.... When she said that they had to haul in the helium for the hot air balloon I cried a little ..... because I was laughing so hard(...)

Flying hot air balloon over Sahara is different than flying hot air balloon over much colder climate. The reason is temperature difference between outside and the inside of the balloon. In colder climate you receive more lift as the colder air is more dense and displaces the ballon in the air with greater force. In Sahara where air is hot you have less difference in temperature and lesser displacing force. So you have to add some helium to the air inside of the ballon to gain some more lift...
Below are some pictures from Dr Boulter trip to the site:

In February 2012, Dr Carmen Boulter led an expedition into the Western Desert of Egypt in search of a new site. She found the coordinates on Google Earth, got permits from the Egyptian government to go into the restricted military zone, arranged for a hot air balloon, and brought a film crew and scientist.

I am not sure where you got that Helium IS used in a hot air balloon.... Here in NM, Albuquerque in particular, balloon flying is very popular and I believe has the world record for mass assent ( most balloons taking off from one point) We had the world renown NM balloon festival every year. From those I have asked since seeing this Helium is NEVER put into a hot air balloon and would simply escape. Both through the vent in the top and the bottom. It is true they went over there in Feb and its just not hot at that time. Certainly no more so that the deserts of the southwest USA in the summer. We can go from freezing to 90 deg in the same day and from calm to 50 mph winds and that is with mountains and obstructions in many places... They still fly balloons all year, for the most part in the summer months. Also a hot air balloon is NOT sealed at the top. It has to release excess heat or it will melt its own envelope. This was fore worded to me to explain the reality of how simple minded her statement really was....:

"The Ideal gas law shows the relationship between pressure, volume, temperature, and the number of molecules of gas.

P*V=n*R*T Where R is a constant.
T is the absolute temperature in degrees Kelvin.

One thing the gas law indicates, is that if two different gases have the same volume at the same temperature, then the molecules of each gas have the same average vibrational and kinetic energy.
And, because one gas may be less massive than the other ( Hydrogen H2=2 grams/mol, and Oxygen O2 is 32 grams/mol) means that Hydrogen will be bouncing around much more than the heavier Oxygen because they have the same energy. The lighter one can move much faster on the same amount of kinetic energy, then the slow big one.


What is temperature anyway:
Temperature, is the measure of kinetic energy ( vibrational and velocity) of the molecules. Molecules are vibrating around like crazy, traveling forward, and spinning in the x, y and Z axis etc. There is no friction, so once they start bouncing and spinning there isnt much to slow them down.

If you could remove all vibrational energy from molecules, they would be as cold as they could be. This temperature is referred to as Absolute zero, because you cant get any colder than zero vibrational energy .
Absolute zero is -273.15C or 0k (Kelvin).

What is Pressure: Gas molecules bounce around against each other, and against the container walls ( if it is in a container). The force applied to the chamber walls of each collission adds up as a force on the wall. The more molecules that bounce into it per second, creates more force on the wall, or Pressure. So Hydrogen for example, is very light and has a lot more velocity than the heavier Oxygen for example. So it bounces around much more quickly, and hence hits the walls much more often then Oxygen which is slower.

Volume: Molecules with higher energy ( hotter, faster ones) are bouncing around much faster than colder ones. The hotter ones, bounce against each other and tend to push themselves further apart.

Hence the hotter gas takes up more volume, than a colder gas. Taking up more volume, makes it less dense than the surrounding cooler air.

Both gases are being pulled towards the ground by the effect of gravity. But the denser colder air is heavier, and is pulled down below the hotter less dense air. Just like heavy objects sink in water, and lighter ones tend to float, because the heavyer molecules are pulled to the bottom by gravity, which forces the ligher ones to move up above them.

So the air in the hot air baloon is less dense then the surrounding air, because the molecules have a higher vibrational energy due to the higher temperature.

Heating of the air caused its volume to increase with respect to the cooler air outside. The extra volume of hot air escaped out the bottom of the hot air baloon. Which is an obvious indication that the remaining air inside must be less dense. So the heavier, cooler outside air forces itself below the less dense baloon, forcing it to rise.

Just to clarify a few points that were made by other responders.
1. Buring Oxygen or anything else for that matter does NOT produce Helium. Helium is an element, and is not produced by chemical reactions.
2. Heat does not rise. The application of heat causes molecules to vibrate and collide more rapidly. The increase in collissions causes the volume of the gas to expand, making it less dense. The gas tends to rise because the sinking heavier surrounding gasses force it up.
3. The heat does not push up on the baloons fabric. The heavier outside air is being forced down by gravity. The less dense baloon is forced up, so the cooler heavier air can sink.
4. A hot air baloon that is open at the bottem ( as almost all are) is never filled with Helium. This is because Helium is so light, that its kinetic energy ( velocity) is very, very high. It would instantly bounce around inside the baloon, and find the hole at the bottem and escape, leaving the baloon to fill with regular cooler air.

This is why a child's Helium baloon made of rubber, only will float for a day or two, then shrinks and falls. If filled with air, it remains inflated for weeks.
If the Helium baloon is made of Mylar it will stay floating for weeks.
This is because rubber baloons have very, very, small holes in the rubber material. the Helium molecules are very small, and are bouncing very fast and hit the walls much more often then the heavier air molecules Nitrogen ( 78% of air is Nitrogen), and Oxygen. The fast moving light Helium finds the small holes and escapes, but the heavier slower Nitrogen and Oxygen take much longer to escape.

Using the gas equation.
If a small amount of gas is heated inside a very large sealed bag, and allowed to expand against the same atmospheric pressure, from one temperature to another, determine the new volume.
This problem indicates that the number of molecules n has not changed, the gas constant did not change, and the pressure did not change.
PV=nRT

P*V2=n*R*T2 final volume and temperature.

P*V1=n*R*T1 Initial volume and temperature

By dividing both equations together, you can eliminate the variables which dont change. This becomes.
V2 = T2
----------
V1 = T1

Re-arranging for V2 showing the new volume.

V2 = (T2 * V1)/(T1)

T2 is hotter than T1, so T2/T1 is a large positive number.
This means that V1 multiplied by this will create a larger answer for V2. The volume increased at the hotter temperature, so the gas is less dense for the same number of molecules."