9/11 - The Aftermath and Implications

[Dale]

It's been just over nine years since September the 11th, 2001, and I feel like it's due time we had a thoughtful discussion over the implications of the events that transpired.

We already have several well researched threads concerning the many contradictions of the "official report" on 9/11, along with several equally well researched individuals contributing to these threads. In my personal opinion, there is sufficient material to question the "official report," but that's not the direction I'm taking with this thread.

Ten years ago; America had considerably less of a presence in the Middle East, and talk of "body scanners" at airports would have been greeted with laughter.

Afghanistan had a good few deviations less of an opium industry, and gasoline was under two dollars a gallon.

There was no Department of Homeland Security.

Nor was there a "Patriot Act."

And the list could continue indefinitely.

I leave this thread open to discussions concerning what the events of September the 11th, 2001 brought to us; both on a collective and individual level.

[Zook]

Hi Dale,

Posted by Dale (here)
It's been just over nine years since September the 11th, 2001, and I feel like it's due time we had a thoughtful discussion over the implications of the events that transpired.
[...]

To the best of my knowledge, the Diocletian tool of Problem-Reaction-Solution has been used now three times (in the global geopolitical narrative) to extract the population of the Earth from beneath national and regional banners; and to place it all together under one gargantuan tent and flag.

http://www.propagandamatrix.com/diocletian.html

TPTB/Illuminati/Rothschilds created the problem (antebellum leading into WWI), offered the reaction (the war itself); and then proposed the solution to the respective weary populations (e.g. League of Nations). Either this lead to global government or it did not. It did not.

TPTB then created the problem again (antebellum leading into WWII), offered the reaction (the war itself); and then proposed the solution to the respective weary populations (e.g. United Nations). Either this lead to global government or it did not. It did not, but it got things closer than previously.

TPTB a.k.a. TDB (The Diocletian Bastards) have now created the problem again (antebellum leading into WWIII - Zionism, Al Qaeda, false flag terrorism, tinctured freedoms, etc.); they will soon give us the war (unless stopped); and will then propose to the weary masses the official solution (e.g. New World Order). Here, they've already made pre-releases of the third act, no doubt to assist us in our preparations (e.g. nice fellas, wot?).

This UFO disclosure thing ... I'm still trying to figure out how that fits in. Is it genuine? Partly genuine? Or plan B in the event the choreographed spectre of Islamic terrorism doesn't produce the desired effect, e.g. WWIII? Perhaps the TPTB have figured more than one way to achieve their NWO and full spectrum dominance? Anyhow, Dale ... those are my preliminary thoughts on the matter.

[Dale]

Uncle Zook,

Certainly right! A push for global governance, or at best, a unified sort of rules by which all nations must bow to, seems to be the name of the game. As you stated, World War I gave to the world an unsuccessful "League of Nations," shortly followed by the more prominent "United Nations" in the aftermath of World War II.

Our newest "enemies," mountain men from half way around the globe, are the newest in a long line of preceding "problems." Our "reaction" is still ongoing, and in my opinion, a few more closely related "problems" will likely be added to the "reaction" before a larger "solution" is provided.

The game is certainly on now.