Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: Randy Maugans & Duncan O'Finioan slam disinfo bullying

  1. Link to Post #21
    Norway Senior Administrator Tommy's Avatar
    Join Date
    11th April 2010
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    463
    Thanks
    1,529
    Thanked 2,576 times in 372 posts

    Default Re: Randy Maugans & Duncan O'Finioan slam disinfo bullying

    I think Bill pretty much says it, and I agree with that statement above.

    Randy and Co took the bait, sadly that is exactly what him/they wanted.

    No offence, but I won't spend any more time on this.

    Cheers

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Tommy For This Post:

    donk (19th December 2012)

  3. Link to Post #22
    Sao Tome Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    12th February 2011
    Location
    where ever there is a smile, ill be there :-)
    Posts
    2,041
    Thanks
    1,906
    Thanked 7,412 times in 1,702 posts

    Default Re: Randy Maugans & Duncan O'Finioan slam disinfo bullying

    Know thy self

    Problem solved

    Hugs

    N

  4. Link to Post #23
    New Zealand Avalon Member HaveBlue's Avatar
    Join Date
    11th January 2011
    Location
    Dunedin, New zealand
    Age
    56
    Posts
    435
    Thanks
    1,121
    Thanked 1,465 times in 346 posts

    Default Re: Randy Maugans & Duncan O'Finioan slam disinfo bullying

    Valueless parasite!!! You tell em' Bill. Why write an essay when two words will suffice? Articulate elegance. I couldn't have said it better.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to HaveBlue For This Post:

    donk (19th December 2012)

  6. Link to Post #24
    United States Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    12th April 2012
    Location
    east coast suburban sprawl
    Posts
    2,896
    Thanks
    11,666
    Thanked 16,349 times in 2,716 posts

    Default Re: Randy Maugans & Duncan O'Finioan slam disinfo bullying

    Quote What I've observed is that he really enjoys it when commenters plainly take his satire seriously. He then ramps things up to the level of sheer farce (obvious to 99% of readers, but clearly not all!) as if to test the gullible even more.
    What does that say about RM (and your friend Duncan) then? Does this imply that he is gullible? And further: that those of us who enjoy his show and entertain the ideas and information he presents are as well?

    Maybe I am totally missing something (it would not be the first time), but I take your replies as kind of dismissive, in a way that may be counter-productive (vs. clearing up some confusion left by what you are not saying). Also counter-productive to your stated intent of taking away attention for the FWH clown.

    RM more than once challenged (borderline attacked) KC (with the support of Duncan) with a lot of vitriol. Like someone mentioned, that in itself is getting to the point of alienating his audience...if it continues (and I am not sure that this thread, which I would certainly be reading if I was him as a forum member, as someone mentioned). I believe seeign terra as much as I do him, so I'm inclined to think that mediation is necessary to "heal the relationship" as zebra pleads (and has been on my mind as well upon hearing the interview), so it kind of seems to me (by omission...aka MY IMPLICATION, so really not fair--but just sharing my truth) you sort of dismiss his value as a contributor to alterative media.

    I am not trying to put words in anyone mouths or read minds, I am giving you my interpertation of how I am experiencing all this: RM is in a RAGE at KC, and states his reasons. seeingterra (representing KC) claims RM's attempts of clearing it up were not sincere or rational. So there is the issue of the "camps" disagreeing that this was legitamately maturly addressed. Actually, the real issue is: THAT THERE IS EVEN "CAMPS"!!

    The FWH douche at this point IS irrelevant. So what happens now? If I were to be presumptuous, Randy doesn't to take the "ignore that what is considered irrelevant nonsense" position BR and KC (by proxy) that you are taking. I will stop listening if he continues to take so much time and energy to publicly air his anger at Kerry regardless, but it just sucks, cuz he does great stuff, not to mention Miranda is awesome, as is Bill's FRIEND Duncan. It would be nice if BR could just stay above the fray. Would be even nicer if RM & KC could have straightened it amongst themselves awhile. Would be great if SOMEONE could get over themselves, be the better person and just say, I was wrong about what I said when I said ____, I'm sorry, let's move on.

    But unless things have changed in the last couple weeks (and i truly apologize if they have...I tried to get up to speed best I can), RM wasn't close to that point last I heard. In fact, he dug himself deeper and seems (seemed) hell-bent in his righteousness, in accusations pretty much to me sounded like "Kerry is on the dark side".

    My quesition: Is my interpretation of the situation correct? If so, that would imply Randy is to just be ignored, right, as you are setting the example? theOr at least taken as FWH or Charles type, an attention whore who whether intentionally or not divides the alternative media community?

    KC (through admin) took the first step toward resolution, attempted to deal with Randy. I think the next step should be taken: declare something like: We tried to address the Randy Maugins situation though he was unreasonable. Here is the our truth to each of the statements he made. We apologize for any confusion caused on our end, and feel this wat about RM.

    It may take slightly more time than the reading and replying you have already done on this thread, but it would certainly put it to bed, and redirect the energy some of us in the community who have chosen to taken interest in this.

    All of this with respect and love to all!!

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts