Here and Now...What's Happening?

[ulli]

Over there I see lurkers from Iowa, reading how their entire state was judged based on one law suit.
And over here just one woman creeped out by the idea of group sex...more so if it's with a feisty dental assistant and whatever creep she might want to bring to my house for dinner.
I'd fire the lot of them. Case dismissed.

[Chester]

Love to you, Ulli - I often make the mistake of over reading someone's words... projecting more into it than might be the case and then - taking a swing with impossible to respond to words such as "ranters will be ranters" which simply invites response from those like me who enjoy the energetic ramp up BUT... you also know me pretty well, and you know that I am far more about live and let live... and that means those who prefer to live in a way that is not my way, as long as their way does not become an imposition upon my own life, then all's well.

I was pointing out how ludicrous it is that these types of things, like firing people because they are too sexy (ahahahah) could actually be allowed to waste the time of a State Supreme Court, waste the tax payer's money that paid for the clown show in the first place...

Why can't we just fire someone we hired without there having to be a reason. Do I need to have some legally approved reason to hire someone? No. So why do I need some court to decide I can legally fire someone, even if it is because I perceive them to be "too sexy" hahahah Ludicrous.

I can't wait for the next life.... as I am certain it will be (back) on Venus.

[Chester]

Posted by araucaria (here)

Posted by justoneman (here)

...and what are those who react to ranters? reactors? and what are what are those who respond to rants? responders? and what are those who ignore rants? ignorers? and what are those who label? labelers? and what are those who respond to the responders to ranters? rant responders? should we go further?

I don't know which thing I enjoy more - watching folks squirm? or watching those who watch folks squirm or watching the folks who are watching the folks who squirm.

blabberers will be blabberers... like I am this moment.

I think I will now become a tree and leave.

Justo, I think you are being a bit of a bathmologist. I know you don't know what that is, I'll tell you some other time ok?

That is, he engages in a bathmology, a statement with a series of interpretations ranging from the naive to the ironic. His laugh teaches the reader to listen not only to what the writer says but also to the texture, tone, and bathos of his humor.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/40542110/S...ies-Television

I would say, "accurate" and I am glad you did not pounce on selective interpretation or worse, inaccurate interpretation which was then responded to through innuendo.

[mojo]

hi all the power came back today...and another snow storm moved in...thats back to back...but's its toasty inside and wishing all of you well...

[ulli]

Posted by justoneman (here)
Love to you, Ulli - I often make the mistake of over reading someone's words... projecting more into it than might be the case and then - taking a swing with impossible to respond to words such as "ranters will be ranters" which simply invites response from those like me who enjoy the energetic ramp up BUT... you also know me pretty well, and you know that I am far more about live and let live... and that means those who prefer to live in a way that is not my way, as long as their way does not become an imposition upon my own life, then all's well.

I was pointing out how ludicrous it is that these types of things, like firing people because they are too sexy (ahahahah) could actually be allowed to waste the time of a State Supreme Court, waste the tax payer's money that paid for the clown show in the first place...

Why can't we just fire someone we hired without there having to be a reason. Do I need to have some legally approved reason to hire someone? No. So why do I need some court to decide I can legally fire someone, even if it is because I perceive them to be "too sexy" hahahah Ludicrous.

I can't wait for the next life.... as I am certain it will be (back) on Venus.

The right to hire and fire as one wishes has been sadly eroded. Most likely due to union action over the decades.
I was putting myself in that dentist's position...getting sued for firing a person who he had to work with at close quarters,
and whose chemistry interfered with his steady hand.
I would hate to visit a dentist who has an horny assistant and the poor guy can't protect himself from her vibes.

If he cares for his clients at all than firing her was the right thing to do. He had to defend himself in court for doing so, in which case whatever spin his attorneys gave to the story is anyone's guess.
I'm glad he won the case but also sad that it led to him being ridiculed in public.
Which is what I saw your rant (your label, not mine) as being about in the first place...
Even thoughI admit you have since changed your tone.

[ulli]

Posted by mojo (here)
hi all the power came back today...and another snow storm moved in...thats back to back...but's its toasty inside and wishing all of you well...

I spent a good ten minutes wishing for the power to come back yesterday.
The idea of people freezing is just as repugnant to me as the idea of them going hungry.
Stay toasty and warm.

[araucaria]

Posted by justoneman (here)

Posted by araucaria (here)

Posted by justoneman (here)

...and what are those who react to ranters? reactors? and what are what are those who respond to rants? responders? and what are those who ignore rants? ignorers? and what are those who label? labelers? and what are those who respond to the responders to ranters? rant responders? should we go further?

I don't know which thing I enjoy more - watching folks squirm? or watching those who watch folks squirm or watching the folks who are watching the folks who squirm.

blabberers will be blabberers... like I am this moment.

I think I will now become a tree and leave.

Justo, I think you are being a bit of a bathmologist. I know you don't know what that is, I'll tell you some other time ok?

That is, he engages in a bathmology, a statement with a series of interpretations ranging from the naive to the ironic. His laugh teaches the reader to listen not only to what the writer says but also to the texture, tone, and bathos of his humor.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/40542110/S...ies-Television

I would say, "accurate" and I am glad you did not pounce on selective interpretation or worse... inaccurate interpretation which was then responded to through innuendo.

very good, you've done your homework, a canny tool this internet thingy.

[araucaria]

Posted by ulli (here)

Posted by justoneman (here)
Love to you, Ulli - I often make the mistake of over reading someone's words... projecting more into it than might be the case and then - taking a swing with impossible to respond to words such as "ranters will be ranters" which simply invites response from those like me who enjoy the energetic ramp up BUT... you also know me pretty well, and you know that I am far more about live and let live... and that means those who prefer to live in a way that is not my way, as long as their way does not become an imposition upon my own life, then all's well.

I was pointing out how ludicrous it is that these types of things, like firing people because they are too sexy (ahahahah) could actually be allowed to waste the time of a State Supreme Court, waste the tax payer's money that paid for the clown show in the first place...

Why can't we just fire someone we hired without there having to be a reason. Do I need to have some legally approved reason to hire someone? No. So why do I need some court to decide I can legally fire someone, even if it is because I perceive them to be "too sexy" hahahah Ludicrous.

I can't wait for the next life.... as I am certain it will be (back) on Venus.

The right to hire and fire as one wishes has been sadly eroded. Most likely due to union action over the decades.
I was putting myself in that dentist's position...getting sued for firing a person who he had to work with at close quarters,
and whose chemistry interfered with his steady hand.
I would hate to visit a dentist who has an horny assistant and the poor guy can't protect himself from her vibes.

If he cares for his clients at all than firing her was the right thing to do. He had to defend himself in court for doing so, in which case whatever spin his attorneys gave to the story is anyone's guess.
I'm glad he won the case but also sad that it led to him being ridiculed in public.
Which is what I saw your rant (your label, not mine) as being about in the first place...
Even thoughI admit you have since changed your tone.

I have no quibble with what you say, Ulli, and am not familiar with the details of the case, which is in any case an isolated employer/employee relationship, but workers' 'rights' (as in human rights) have been so eroded for so long and in so many increasingly subtle (or unsubtle) ways that it may be inappropriate to be criticizing the unions, who are, on a very basic level, ultimately striving by similar collective means to shake off the yoke, as we ourselves are from a broader perspective.

[Carmody]

I am reminded of the one store owner, who owns three stores in the area. He always hired 'hot' young ladies for employees. He's married now, and has a child.

His latest employee 'hires'.....exude notably less sex appeal.

I had discussion of this subject with a friend whom I work with (business wise). It went something like:

The problem is that it is real, and that your sanity and capacity to run your business and the future of the families of ~40 people whom work for you, are, to a certain extent threatened by the given instability.

In the case of that, it is Your family's security, your connections in business and their stability and the stability of the lives and families of your employees.

And the situation is that YOU cannot go, as the owner and operator. And that, regardless of the origins of the situation, regardless of where it lies now or where it might go..that the problem , or other part of the problem equation, this person... has to go. End of story. There's no other immediately viable answer. There's no fair here, as that is the way it has rolled out and that is what is in front of you.

[araucaria]

Posted by 1inMany (here)
One last thought before I get busy...Calz, I don't know anything about that Fatima thing, but I do know a particular "Science" teacher I'd like to send that to....

Calz, can you tell us a bit more about this quote and what we are supposed to make of it. Fatima was debunked by the future John Paul I and binned by his three predecessors. Here on Avalon, Cartomancer has indicated that Fatime is due west of St Peter's Square in the post following this one.

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post522828

[ulli]

Posted by araucaria (here)

Posted by ulli (here)

Posted by justoneman (here)
Love to you, Ulli - I often make the mistake of over reading someone's words... projecting more into it than might be the case and then - taking a swing with impossible to respond to words such as "ranters will be ranters" which simply invites response from those like me who enjoy the energetic ramp up BUT... you also know me pretty well, and you know that I am far more about live and let live... and that means those who prefer to live in a way that is not my way, as long as their way does not become an imposition upon my own life, then all's well.

I was pointing out how ludicrous it is that these types of things, like firing people because they are too sexy (ahahahah) could actually be allowed to waste the time of a State Supreme Court, waste the tax payer's money that paid for the clown show in the first place...

Why can't we just fire someone we hired without there having to be a reason. Do I need to have some legally approved reason to hire someone? No. So why do I need some court to decide I can legally fire someone, even if it is because I perceive them to be "too sexy" hahahah Ludicrous.

I can't wait for the next life.... as I am certain it will be (back) on Venus.

The right to hire and fire as one wishes has been sadly eroded. Most likely due to union action over the decades.
I was putting myself in that dentist's position...getting sued for firing a person who he had to work with at close quarters,
and whose chemistry interfered with his steady hand.
I would hate to visit a dentist who has an horny assistant and the poor guy can't protect himself from her vibes.

If he cares for his clients at all than firing her was the right thing to do. He had to defend himself in court for doing so, in which case whatever spin his attorneys gave to the story is anyone's guess.
I'm glad he won the case but also sad that it led to him being ridiculed in public.
Which is what I saw your rant (your label, not mine) as being about in the first place...
Even thoughI admit you have since changed your tone.

I have no quibble with what you say, Ulli, and am not familiar with the details of the case, which is in any case an isolated employer/employee relationship, but workers' 'rights' (as in human rights) have been so eroded for so long and in so many increasingly subtle (or unsubtle) ways that it may be inappropriate to be criticizing the unions, who are, on a very basic level, ultimately striving by similar collective means to shake off the yoke, as we ourselves are from a broader perspective.

I have no umbrage with unions per se....they are needed, there is no doubt.
Where there are large groups of people there need to be representatives.
And for the very reason you cited up there.

But there have also been endless attempts to infiltrate the unions, certainly the larger ones,
by the very PTB, with extremists and menacing individuals who manipulate the work force in order to bring down the whole apple cart.
I know terrible stories from both sides...management as well as unions.

This conversation could go on forever (thank you, dear Chester) because now I'm really warming up ...
mainly about voting procedures, as in "show of hand" rather than secret ballot,
but have to get ready to go out.

[Chester]

Posted by ulli (here)

Posted by justoneman (here)
Love to you, Ulli - I often make the mistake of over reading someone's words... projecting more into it than might be the case and then - taking a swing with impossible to respond to words such as "ranters will be ranters" which simply invites response from those like me who enjoy the energetic ramp up BUT... you also know me pretty well, and you know that I am far more about live and let live... and that means those who prefer to live in a way that is not my way, as long as their way does not become an imposition upon my own life, then all's well.

I was pointing out how ludicrous it is that these types of things, like firing people because they are too sexy (ahahahah) could actually be allowed to waste the time of a State Supreme Court, waste the tax payer's money that paid for the clown show in the first place...

Why can't we just fire someone we hired without there having to be a reason. Do I need to have some legally approved reason to hire someone? No. So why do I need some court to decide I can legally fire someone, even if it is because I perceive them to be "too sexy" hahahah Ludicrous.

I can't wait for the next life.... as I am certain it will be (back) on Venus.

The right to hire and fire as one wishes has been sadly eroded. Most likely due to union action over the decades.
I was putting myself in that dentist's position...getting sued for firing a person who he had to work with at close quarters,
and whose chemistry interfered with his steady hand.
I would hate to visit a dentist who has an horny assistant and the poor guy can't protect himself from her vibes.

If he cares for his clients at all than firing her was the right thing to do. He had to defend himself in court for doing so, in which case whatever spin his attorneys gave to the story is anyone's guess.
I'm glad he won the case but also sad that it led to him being ridiculed in public.
Which is what I saw your rant (your label, not mine) as being about in the first place...
Even thoughI admit you have since changed your tone.

Lots of assumption here - how do we know "the assistant" was horney? The assistant might simply have been an attractive individual that wasn't afraid to allow their sexuality come through (along with the rest of their 6 chakra energies).

And that "he".. was it a he? I didn't even register a gender... well anyway, that "he" would have to choose that rout is incredibly sickening to me and I hate the fact I actually share physical space with anyone that sad and clueless, but alas, such is the situation amongst diversity.

Makes me wonder... should I focus upon the human sacrificing Satanists? or should I focus upon clowns like this guy? hahahah hummmmm.

Neither is perhaps the answer - I should Carmody it and never allow myself to be exposed to MSM.

And I didn't just ridicule him... I hoped to have done far worse and now wanna pile on more and more and more. Why? Because someone lost a job because an idiot like her ex-boss was unable to rise above himself and realize there happens to be Hot, Sexy people all over the globe and realize that the MSM pounds this reality into our heads ever single day. Get over it "children" in fact... maybe try and grow the heck up so you stop being puppets for the puppeteers who can jerk the reality strings because your psychology is ass backwards. ahahah what a clown show we live in in parts of our lovely Western World. Thanks GOD for Latin America.

Not directed at you, Ulli... just directed to all us idiots (me included) who lived so long under the manipulation of MSM... the only reason people get all wanged out about the fact we are also sexual beings is because we allow the manipulators to twist our minds in that direction. That's the real target of my rant.

I think I am going out tonight (rare that I do!)

[Flash]

I can tell you that Unions in Quebec are quite infiltrated, by all kinds.

I can also tell you that here, if the dentist ever ends up with the girl, she can sue his ass off and get his business axsa compensation for "sexual harrassment". Believe me, this happens more than you can imagine.

Also, how often have I seen guys harrassing pretty girls, this is the other side of the coin, pretty girls have often difficulties to work in peace and with decent behavior from all those around.

Finally, a comment from an ex female collegue of mine "this is so great to have passed 40, sex is no more taken into account for hiring, firing, employee's performance evaluations, you now can only be as you are and always were without desires being projected onto you"

[Chester]

Posted by araucaria (here)

Posted by justoneman (here)

Posted by araucaria (here)

Posted by justoneman (here)

...and what are those who react to ranters? reactors? and what are what are those who respond to rants? responders? and what are those who ignore rants? ignorers? and what are those who label? labelers? and what are those who respond to the responders to ranters? rant responders? should we go further?

I don't know which thing I enjoy more - watching folks squirm? or watching those who watch folks squirm or watching the folks who are watching the folks who squirm.

blabberers will be blabberers... like I am this moment.

I think I will now become a tree and leave.

Justo, I think you are being a bit of a bathmologist. I know you don't know what that is, I'll tell you some other time ok?

That is, he engages in a bathmology, a statement with a series of interpretations ranging from the naive to the ironic. His laugh teaches the reader to listen not only to what the writer says but also to the texture, tone, and bathos of his humor.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/40542110/S...ies-Television

I would say, "accurate" and I am glad you did not pounce on selective interpretation or worse... inaccurate interpretation which was then responded to through innuendo.

very good, you've done your homework, a canny tool this internet thingy.

actually I read No Exit (Camu) in 11th grade and seems I came upon the word back then... maybe not? "brain damage" is my excuse

[ulli]

Posted by justoneman (here)

Posted by ulli (here)

Posted by justoneman (here)
Love to you, Ulli - I often make the mistake of over reading someone's words... projecting more into it than might be the case and then - taking a swing with impossible to respond to words such as "ranters will be ranters" which simply invites response from those like me who enjoy the energetic ramp up BUT... you also know me pretty well, and you know that I am far more about live and let live... and that means those who prefer to live in a way that is not my way, as long as their way does not become an imposition upon my own life, then all's well.

I was pointing out how ludicrous it is that these types of things, like firing people because they are too sexy (ahahahah) could actually be allowed to waste the time of a State Supreme Court, waste the tax payer's money that paid for the clown show in the first place...

Why can't we just fire someone we hired without there having to be a reason. Do I need to have some legally approved reason to hire someone? No. So why do I need some court to decide I can legally fire someone, even if it is because I perceive them to be "too sexy" hahahah Ludicrous.

I can't wait for the next life.... as I am certain it will be (back) on Venus.

The right to hire and fire as one wishes has been sadly eroded. Most likely due to union action over the decades.
I was putting myself in that dentist's position...getting sued for firing a person who he had to work with at close quarters,
and whose chemistry interfered with his steady hand.
I would hate to visit a dentist who has an horny assistant and the poor guy can't protect himself from her vibes.

If he cares for his clients at all than firing her was the right thing to do. He had to defend himself in court for doing so, in which case whatever spin his attorneys gave to the story is anyone's guess.
I'm glad he won the case but also sad that it led to him being ridiculed in public.
Which is what I saw your rant (your label, not mine) as being about in the first place...
Even thoughI admit you have since changed your tone.

Lots of assumption here - how do we know "the assistant" was horney? The assistant might simply have been an attractive individual that wasn't afraid to allow their sexuality come through (along with the rest of their 6 chakra energies).

And that "he".. was it a he? I didn't even register a gender... well anyway, that "he" would have to choose that rout is incredibly sickening to me and I hate the fact I actually share physical space with anyone that sad and clueless, but alas, such is the situation amongst diversity.

Makes me wonder... should I focus upon the human sacrificing Satanists? or should I focus upon clowns like this guy? hahahah hummmmm.

And I didn't just ridicule him... I hoped to have done far worse and now wanna pile on more and more and more. Why? Because someone lost a job because an idiot like her ex-boss was unable to rise above himself and realize there happens to be Hot, Sexy people all over the globe and realize that the MSM pounds this reality into our heads ever single day. Get over it "children" in fact... maybe try and grow the heck up so you stop being puppets for the puppeteers who can jerk the reality strings because your psychology is ass backwards. ahahah what a clown show we live in in parts of our lovely Western World. Thanks GOD for Latin America.

Neither is perhaps the answer - I should Carmody it and never allow myself to be exposed to MSM.

I think I am going out tonight (rare that I do!)

No matter how high one's level of self control is...
there is always some situation that could be just the right chemistry combination to take the mind of the job at hand.
Which is why not every job has TV screens blaring constantly, or allows people to bring their boom boxes to work.
The job environment is up to the owner of the business to maintain, as Carmody says, it is not a question of "either she goes or I go".
Anyway, Chester, your intolerance is showing and I might have to hold my nose next time I drive through San Jose.

Your words from your initial rant about that "idiot" dentist.

[araucaria]

Posted by justoneman (here)

Posted by araucaria (here)

Posted by justoneman (here)

Posted by araucaria (here)

Posted by justoneman (here)

...and what are those who react to ranters? reactors? and what are what are those who respond to rants? responders? and what are those who ignore rants? ignorers? and what are those who label? labelers? and what are those who respond to the responders to ranters? rant responders? should we go further?

I don't know which thing I enjoy more - watching folks squirm? or watching those who watch folks squirm or watching the folks who are watching the folks who squirm.

blabberers will be blabberers... like I am this moment.

I think I will now become a tree and leave.

Justo, I think you are being a bit of a bathmologist. I know you don't know what that is, I'll tell you some other time ok?

That is, he engages in a bathmology, a statement with a series of interpretations ranging from the naive to the ironic. His laugh teaches the reader to listen not only to what the writer says but also to the texture, tone, and bathos of his humor.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/40542110/S...ies-Television

I would say, "accurate" and I am glad you did not pounce on selective interpretation or worse... inaccurate interpretation which was then responded to through innuendo.

very good, you've done your homework, a canny tool this internet thingy.

actually I read No Exit (Camu) in 11th grade and seems I came upon the word back then... maybe not? "brain damage" is my excuse

Wow, hats off!

Pity you added Camus though, it was Sartre

Exit muttering 'Hell is other people'....

Edit: Hey, Barthes didn't talk about bathmology in Mythologies, only much later, c.1978. And come to think of it, are you not by any chance confusing Albert Camus, the philosopher and playwright with Renaud Camus, who wrote about bathmology after Barthes? When I say hell is othe people...

[dan33]

Merery Christmas for all of you.

[Flash]

Posted by araucaria (here)

Posted by justoneman (here)

Posted by araucaria (here)

Posted by justoneman (here)

Posted by araucaria (here)

Posted by justoneman (here)

...and what are those who react to ranters? reactors? and what are what are those who respond to rants? responders? and what are those who ignore rants? ignorers? and what are those who label? labelers? and what are those who respond to the responders to ranters? rant responders? should we go further?

I don't know which thing I enjoy more - watching folks squirm? or watching those who watch folks squirm or watching the folks who are watching the folks who squirm.

blabberers will be blabberers... like I am this moment.

I think I will now become a tree and leave.

Justo, I think you are being a bit of a bathmologist. I know you don't know what that is, I'll tell you some other time ok?

That is, he engages in a bathmology, a statement with a series of interpretations ranging from the naive to the ironic. His laugh teaches the reader to listen not only to what the writer says but also to the texture, tone, and bathos of his humor.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/40542110/S...ies-Television

I would say, "accurate" and I am glad you did not pounce on selective interpretation or worse... inaccurate interpretation which was then responded to through innuendo.

very good, you've done your homework, a canny tool this internet thingy.

actually I read No Exit (Camu) in 11th grade and seems I came upon the word back then... maybe not? "brain damage" is my excuse

Wow, hats off!

Pity you added Camus though, it was Sartre

Exit muttering 'Hell is other people'....

Edit: Hey, Barthes didn't talk about bathmology in Mythologies, only much later, c.1978. And come to think of it, are you not by any chance confusing Albert Camus, the philosopher and playwright with Renaud Camus, who wrote about bathmology after Barthes? When I say hell is othe people...

You truly made me laugh Auraucaria, even my French speaking me is dizzy!

Oups, one too many u, Araucaria (name written or created by???)lol

[CD7]

Here and Now there is a beautiful rainbow ring around the sun...but i only see two sides not the complete circle as whoeverthehelltheyare sprayed the sky silly

[ulli]

Posted by dan33 (here)
Merery Christmas for all of you.

Hi Dan. I hope all is well, and Hugo is recovering, too.
Wishing you and your family a Merry Christmas.
Lots of love....