Page 6 of 15 FirstFirst 1 6 15 LastLast
Results 101 to 120 of 285

Thread: Tap on, Tap off, the tapper.

  1. Link to Post #101
    Mexico Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    30th June 2012
    Age
    44
    Posts
    483
    Thanks
    2,036
    Thanked 3,360 times in 440 posts

    Default Re: Tap on, Tap off, the tapper.

    Quote Find somewhere else to troll, this is important work..
    Well the only other topic I really want to troll is kreagle's Bible topic. Unfortunately I promised him I will not do that. So I took my toys out of his thread and since then I am looking for another thread to troll. And when I stumbled upon your threads I looked at my rubber duckie , tears where coming out of our eyes , knowing we found a home at last.
    But now it seems we have to relocate again.

    I will read again tomorrow everything you posted on this forum; with a very open mind. If I missed something, if I think we can somehow relate, at some level, I will get back to you. If not you will never see me or duckie on your threads again.






    Last edited by Cristian; 16th December 2012 at 23:55.

  2. Link to Post #102
    United States Administrator ThePythonicCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Language
    English
    Age
    78
    Posts
    30,922
    Thanks
    37,979
    Thanked 155,322 times in 23,776 posts

    Default Re: Tap on, Tap off, the tapper.

    Quote Posted by Chris82 (here)
    I will read again tomorrow everything you posted on this forum; with a very open mind. If I missed something, if I think we can somehow relate, at some level, I will get back to you. If not you will never see me or duckie on your threads again.
    That might be for the better, actually .

    I usually suggest that if the opposing views on a thread become too sharp, it is better to make separate threads of it.

    In this case however I will confess that I have a bit more than this in mind.

    The more I attempt to read of your posts, 7redorbs, the less sense they are making to me. We limit promotion of the non-free works of others on this forum to those areas where we think that are of benefit to the forum members. I will confess that I am beginning to have doubts whether such is so, for the work presented on this thread.
    My quite dormant website: pauljackson.us

  3. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ThePythonicCow For This Post:

    Cristian (17th December 2012), Jean-Luc (4th January 2013), Tesseract (19th December 2012)

  4. Link to Post #103
    UK Avalon Founder Bill Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th February 2010
    Location
    Ecuador
    Posts
    39,762
    Thanks
    292,438
    Thanked 526,855 times in 38,298 posts

    Default Re: Tap on, Tap off, the tapper.

    -------

    Like Paul, as a formally trained physicist and mathematician I'm not qualified or able to comment on many of these concepts. I simply don't understand them, and it would be cheap and deceptive if I were to pretend that I did.

    But having said that: I do remember in Robert Collins' book Exempt From Disclosure, there was a very credible report towards the end of the book from a black projects physicist in Los Alamos who had said that in order to back-engineer the ET craft at their disposal, they had to start learning physics again from scratch, discarding all the concepts and constructs which they all believed they knew and understood. (my paraphrase)
    Last edited by Bill Ryan; 17th December 2012 at 13:14.

  5. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Bill Ryan For This Post:

    7redorbs (17th December 2012), Cristian (17th December 2012), Davidallany (17th December 2012), eaglespirit (17th December 2012), Gardener (5th January 2013), Hervé (4th January 2013), mosquito (19th December 2012), nomadguy (19th December 2012), Richard S. (18th December 2012), sandy (18th December 2012), SnowyOwl (5th January 2013), Yoda (17th December 2012)

  6. Link to Post #104
    Belgium Avalon Member Jean-Luc's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th January 2011
    Location
    near Brussels
    Age
    64
    Posts
    628
    Thanks
    5,382
    Thanked 5,182 times in 591 posts

    Default Re: Tap on, Tap off, the tapper.

    Quote Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
    -------

    ...they had to start learning physics again from scratch, discarding all the concepts and constructs which they all believed they knew and understood. (my paraphrase)

    Quote Posted by M.T. Keshe - http://www.keshefoundation.org/phpbb...3191&start=460
    -------

    "Walk away in thinking in physical barrier terms and think in Magravs strength barrier and you will find new dimensions in operation that is flexible, easy and joy to work with".
    .
    Last edited by Jean-Luc; 17th December 2012 at 16:33.

  7. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Jean-Luc For This Post:

    7redorbs (17th December 2012), Gardener (5th January 2013), sandy (18th December 2012), SnowyOwl (5th January 2013)

  8. Link to Post #105
    Avalon Member Tesseract's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th October 2012
    Posts
    834
    Thanks
    1,740
    Thanked 3,418 times in 744 posts

    Default Re: Tap on, Tap off, the tapper.

    I have been meaning to reply to this for a week, since finding the thread thanks to Chris’s comment bumping it into view. I did vacillate about how to go about this – just let loose and not care about blowing away the OP? Or, try and be polite, after all, Avalon does have some standards of civility. Let’s see how we go.

    I’m not going to address every suspect point made by the OP as it would take forever, and the language used by the OP makes certain of his statements open to interpretation and therefore any critic would be open to the accusation of mis-interpreting the OP. Nonetheless I will do my best to express a few of my concerns, dissatisfactions and general thoughts.

    1) The OP makes a big noise about the fact you can’t actually see an electron. Of course you can’t, eyes detect light. No one is claiming you can see electrons. Even if you go down the path of wave-particle duality the DeBroglie wavelength of an electron is too small for the human eye to detect.


    2) OP states “I have discovered that the electron consists of a north and south pole magnet”. Electrons have mass, charge and spin. These are fundamental properties of the electron. What is spin? Why is it called that? Spin is a bit of a puzzle, just like mass and charge, but it is described as being angular momentum at the quantum level – the upshot is that it is related to the magnetic moment that the electron possesses. It is called spin because it is as if the magnetic moment is caused by a ‘spinning’ charge. So, the OP has not in fact discovered anything new, scientists have known about it for a long time and there is even a branch of spectroscopy dedicated to studying chemicals with an unpaired electron (ESR spectroscopy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electro...etic_resonance ) The below link is an honest introduction to electron spin in general

    http://www.electronspin.org/

    3) OP states “ I can increase the strength of an electromagnet on a ruler, by simply balancing the ruler on the edge of a metal table. This is proof that gravity and magnetism are connected.” So, instead of posting about it on Avalon, my advice is to write up your experiment in full detail, and then submit it to a respected journal for peer review. That is the best way to get your results across to the people who need to see them.

    4) The OPs constant assertion that electrons categorically do not exist is contradicted by his constant invocation of electrons to explain physical behaviours.

    5) The OPs description of batteries is not helpful, sorry but I have to be honest here. It is confusing in the extreme, and actually contains some statements that are not generally correct. Due to the OPs woeful writing about this field I have to doubt the OPs level of knowledge in this area. Therefore, I have no confidence that he really has a lot of knowledge in the other areas that he writes about.

    6) The OP does appear to use the words magnets and orbits or orbitals in different contexts which makes it near impossible to follow his reasoning.

    7) I would like to state that I am all for counter-theories in science. I have read some truly brilliant and thought provoking material online that attacks some of the modern paradigms in physics. Good writing is essential to allowing others to understand your ideas, and they must understand them in order to adopt them. The link below is one of my favourites, I think it was hosted somewhere else originally – you need to see the pictures for the most pleasure.
    http://oaxismundi.blogspot.com/2010/...hysics-to.html .

    8) Due to his poor writing, the OP fails, IMO, to impart knowledge to the reader. His work is an act of obscurantism rather than an act of revelation. This is particularly sad if there is indeed a useful fact or two buried in his rambling.

    9) The OPs general disdain for scientists is absurd and only serves to highlight his own prejudices.


    10) I suggest the OP take a look at what conventional, educated scientists have achieved over the last 250 years. Does he not think it’s impressive? Today scientists continue to achieve amazing accomplishments such as sending probes to the moons of Saturn, measuring the speed of approaching galaxies, creating devices that store a library of information on a chip the size of your fingernail, building lasers that can fix your eyesight and so on. And yet we scientists, according to the OP, have done all of this at the same time as we are completely wrong about everything! It’s farcical.

    11) If the book is written in as confusing a manner as the OPs posts then I understand why the OP resorted to self publishing.


    12) The alternative community has an appetite for, well, what you might call ‘science on magic mushrooms’. Thinking outside the box is good, but one must have standards. I encourage Bill and every other person trained (including self-trained) in science to ask the obvious questions and highlight the obvious contradictions. There will always be someone more expert. Congratulations Chris for having the intellectual fortitude to give this the duck. I liked the duck btw.

  9. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Tesseract For This Post:

    Cristian (19th December 2012), Hervé (19th December 2012)

  10. Link to Post #106
    United States Administrator ThePythonicCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Language
    English
    Age
    78
    Posts
    30,922
    Thanks
    37,979
    Thanked 155,322 times in 23,776 posts

    Default Re: Tap on, Tap off, the tapper.

    Quote Posted by Tesseract (here)
    Let’s see how we go.
    I may regret saying this, but on first read, your post makes good sense to me. Thanks.
    My quite dormant website: pauljackson.us

  11. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ThePythonicCow For This Post:

    Cristian (19th December 2012), Tesseract (20th December 2012)

  12. Link to Post #107
    New Zealand Avalon Member HaveBlue's Avatar
    Join Date
    11th January 2011
    Location
    Dunedin, New zealand
    Age
    56
    Posts
    435
    Thanks
    1,121
    Thanked 1,465 times in 346 posts

    Default Re: Tap on, Tap off, the tapper.

    Then I'll say it with no regrets and here's why. There's an old saying 'if you can't dazzle em' with brilliance then baffle em' with BS.

    The OP has done neither to this poster. Why? Because if there was anything to it then he'd produce the goods. You show your device under load and measure the torque. (Watts)

    This is why John Searle has nothing. Apply a load to his contraptions and they stop. Watching something go around due to magnetism is nothing. Apply a load (resistance) and then if it still goes it produces torque. AKA Work, (joules) Then you have something.

    Watching a steel ruler move up and down next to an electric motor that is producing the magnetism acting on the ruler, strength depending on how much mains power is given (and then taken away), AKA elecro magnetism then claiming some 'energy' unknown or supressed by TPB is beyond a joke.

    Yet another case of, all thought and theory (fancy words and numbers) and no substance.
    Last edited by HaveBlue; 19th December 2012 at 09:00.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to HaveBlue For This Post:

    Tesseract (20th December 2012)

  14. Link to Post #108
    UK Avalon Member
    Join Date
    12th May 2012
    Posts
    131
    Thanks
    99
    Thanked 947 times in 126 posts

    Default Re: Tap on, Tap off, the tapper.

    To those that believe my explanations are hearsay , unfounded, or non peer reviewed scientific assumptions consider that light is highly magnetic of inconceivable power than the laws of motion previously predicted for the last 100 years (2011, University of Michigan). It's proven what I am saying.

    Academics know nothing but textbooks and equations. Which describe things admirably, but if they are perceptually incorrect, they are always wrong. Like The greeks theory of gravity, and the embarassing accumulations of contradictory evidence. Like the greeks theory of solar motion, and the embarassing accumulation of inventive epicycles to "prop up the broken invention of the greeks". This is a method not unfamiliar to that of Einstein. When an inventive effort breaks down, simply invent a new one to prop it up. Newton would have been appalled. So what is going on here anyway?



    Not just says me, Dollard, Leedskalnin, Tesla, University of Michigan, Egor Babaev and the list actually goes on. Faster than light waves did exist in the Marconi facility post 1914-1917 until R.C.A took it over. Tesla gave the speed of his electrical propogations as pi / 2 * C, a full 1.57 times faster than Einstein's fallacy law of relativity predicts. Let's see what Tesla had to say about it:

    "He described relativity as a 'beggar wrapped in purple whom ignorant people take for a king.' In support of his statement he cited a number of experiments he had conducted as far back as 1896 on the cosmic ray. He has measured cosmic-ray velocities from Antarus, he said, which he found to be fifty times greater than the speed of light, thus demolishing, he contended, one of the basic pillars of relativity, according to which there can be no speed greater than that of light.”
    -- New York Times, 7/11/35.

    Professor Wheatstone, inventor of the wheatstone bridge and the principles of electrical measurement for analog multimeters gave the electrostatic discharge as 291,000 miles per second aswell, a full 105,000 miles per second faster than einstein's speed of light, or rather pi / 2 * C . Professor Wheatstone, Tesla, Dollard all give the same propagation velocity for their electrical waves. Deluded sciences of fallacy? No. Pioneers that designed working equipment that were motivated by these 1.57 speed of light waves.

    Nothing is left for "guessing". You are all just wrong. I'm sorry, but I am not the con man. You are the con men. Or the conned.

    Whilst you were busy believing what you were taught and educated. I was busy doing the experiments and research.

    Did you not notice all the current science laws of today were built on the heresy of people like Volta, and Tesla yesterday? Most of Tesla's best ideas were considered ridiculous for his time. Yet, they lay in use today.

    This is not a fallacy, this is new science. It is to be expected that those that regard the heresy of yesterday as the immovable laws of today, would consider Einstein an exception to the general rule of fallacy. That is, the fallacy of gravity invented by the greeks was quite improper. It would be 2000 years until someone with enough bravery like Galileo and Newton were to inductively prove the inventions of the greeks wrong.

    There was nothing wrong with the greeks maths, or the greeks reasoning. They were simple lacking some important piece of information that prevented a proper explanation being true and holding to the rigorous laws of the ultimate method of science. In the case of Newton , now instead of thinking inventively as the greeks did was thinking inductively and he eventually could see several important peices of information, in the same way that galileo did. And in the case of those that glory in the achievement of einstein, they are making the assumption that an inductive process, or rather an accumulation of contradictory inventive terms, will not occur again. Such as the clear and concise examples i have given of these contradictory accumulations, such as the unexplainable perpetual motion of electrons orbiting their atoms, or rays from stars consisting of an immense magnetic field that creates light and all things. Now it is being proven, just in the last 2 years. Against all fundamental laws of motion and it is 100 million times more powerful than predicted.

    My work stands testament to all that Tesla believed. And I would thank you for giving it the fair chance, and proper research and inspection that such a monumental thing would require.

    The only assumption being made by all the correct science and maths today is that einstein's relativity has and will not collect an EMBARRASSING accumulation of contradictions, in the same way that Newton, The Greek's and others did. Indeed, the only assumption is by you scientists who would discredit me and my careful and exhaustive research and models - your only assumption is that Einstein is an exception to the universal rule of science and conceptualisation, rather than an example of it. And that means I am deluded? It seems clear to me scientists in here are the ones who are deluded. Insanity even.

    History will record the victors, and truth will be recorded by real gods. Not the self appointed Gods of men, that were taught every single thing they've assumed unmovable, without even seeing an electron. An electron curve , or the light that is coming from the so-called electrons which you einsteinians hold so fear, being curved aswell.

    "Let the future tell the truth and evaluate each one according to his work and accomplishments. The present is theirs; the future, for which I really worked, is mine."


    Bill Ryan, I appreciate you taking the time to reply to this thread but ultimately I would not ask people to buy technology for a new future, I would ask them to study. Study hard. Find the truth. It is so much stranger than fiction. And anyway if einstein is wrong - and the physicists are wrong about electrons which I have now proved - conclusively - then it would be highly inadvisable to reject such a proposal without a proper considered research and reflection. It took me a decade to reach many of the conclusions I have come to. Names like Dollard, Leedskalnin, Tesla, are all you need. Such a thing being true would require the slow and painful deconstruction of most of the tenets of science established in the last 100 years, and that is exactly what is now happening. (whether we like it or not)

    Please, forget about me, and remove all links to solomon-books and my book if you really do think that I would be so self centered to attempt profit from a scam. I say what I say because I have done experiments and have come to the frightful conclusions that have been time and time again established.

    If just one person can tell me why atoms rotate perpetually around their atoms. I could go home happy. But today, the substitution of technical competence for misplaced greed and commerce is the most disgusting thing - and it can only be a result of the clearly delusive idea that energy is not free. An inconceivable amount of free energy from our star and the stars in all this cosmos is beaming down into this planet. All of it wireless and electrostatically conveyed at a speed faster than that of light. (really). Indeed this is something Tesla, Dollard Leedskalnin and myself repeatedly and repeatedly assert. Have you studied our lives? I think you'll find if it's money we're after, we did a poor job of it.

    All on deaf ears i'm afraid. It is not hard to tell if a trained mathematician or physicists is deluded, just ask him why electrons are motivated by locomotion around an atom and where that force might come from. They will never answer. This is the tell tale signs of a conceptually wrong idea, something of which the clear thinkers and engineers of yesterday, i.e. the inductive thinkers would never have permitted.

    The problem with inventors is they accuse people like me of invention whilst holding onto a physics of electrons which does plainly not exist. Nobody has ever seen an electron ever. But it doesn't stop people quacking endlessly parroting the same old laws. This is something that the greeks did for 2000 years, scientists are small minded men if they truly believe that Einstein is an exception to this rule rather than an example of it. Truly.

    This is not a con, this is new science. Remove all links to my book. I care not about the book. I care about the truth. It is why I wrote the book, and I disrespect those that would claim otherwise. You are small men.

    Best,
    A
    Last edited by 7redorbs; 21st December 2012 at 20:19.

  15. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to 7redorbs For This Post:

    Dennis Leahy (3rd January 2013), Gardener (5th January 2013), Jean-Luc (4th January 2013), mosquito (5th January 2013), Patrikas (5th January 2013), sandy (22nd December 2012)

  16. Link to Post #109
    UK Avalon Member
    Join Date
    12th May 2012
    Posts
    131
    Thanks
    99
    Thanked 947 times in 126 posts

    Default Re: Tap on, Tap off, the tapper.

    Faster than light travel, breaking of conservational principles and more.

    As it turns out "science" shows me to NOT be incorrect. Your silence can speak volumes. My truth needs no man to speak for it. For it is being shown to be true by real scientists at MIT like Walter Lewin. Time and time again. But no space-time. hmmm...


    http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/MI...etism_999.html

    Science remarkably shows this to be a reality. Other than getting the credit and modern dating incorrect. This is in fact an old invention of Tesla's. Indeed, the first radio patent was 1.57C, that is over 1 and a half times in excess to the speed of light given by Einstein as a speed limit.

    To put it bluntly "oh dear"

    MIT researchers discover a new kind of magnetism

    Boston MA (SPX) Dec 21, 2012

    " It may take a long time to translate this "very fundamental research" into practical applications, Lee says. The work could possibly lead to advances in data storage or communications, he says - perhaps using an exotic quantum phenomenon called long-range entanglement, in which two widely separated particles can instantaneously influence each other's states. The findings could also bear on research into high-temperature superconductors, and could ultimately lead to new developments in that field, he says.

    "We have to get a more comprehensive understanding of the big picture," Lee says. "There is no theory that describes everything that we're seeing." "


    Read the full article at

    http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/MI...etism_999.html


    Story of the Missing

    Don't miss our future, when it's hidden in the past. Kind and going out of fashion. Will einstein be an exception, or an example of the rule of deprecated and superceded theory.
    The author is beginning to wonder if Einstein's space-time even exists.

    "Einstein always did have a problem with it". - two widely separated particles can instantaneously influence each other's states. He never did like it. Not one bit at all. Einstein frowned and the world cried "WE shall not frown like the little boy that cried the speed of light". THE END.


    The only differnce between these scientists and me, is that I will give Tesla the credit he deserves, for his apparatus that can transmit at 1.57C as well as his instantaneous transmitter, of a speed of infinite C; the T.M.T wardenclyffe invention that tesla historically claimed could transmit "regardless of distance". Here is the scientific principle of research showing, clearly, without obfuscation or any confusion that what Tesla stated was a working reality, not only was possible, but was a working reality then, as well as this science research of today showing that all the claims he made, might be 100% scientifically true.

    Indeed, this is not old or current MODERN science. It is incredibly old ancient science, and relatively old modern science, the future that was stolen from Tesla over 100 years ago now. That will be retaken. Whether the imbasile or the fool chooses to chime in his own efforts or not, the past modern science literature is becoming the reality it always was. The 1.57C transmitter was in operation for 4 years until the military and government took over the marconi bolinas facility.

    The reason they had to take it over was that it was using tesla's faster than light patents, and threatened the "good american way of material life and economy". It didn't only have those Einstein speed Hertzian velocity waves. It had the tesla faster than light velocities.


    This would have to be dealt with, and removed as soon as possible.

    And that is what happened. They removed the tesla faster than light waves, and resulted in the imprisonment of humanity to einstein limitation 1.0C Electromagnetic waves. It would now be "against the law" to believe or do work, to experiment with any other type of wave. In fact the faster than light waves are now classified from 1918-present.

    Here they were saving their material age of greed and war, and the 60's and 70's cold war along with it. Killing and slaying then, were they the free energy system, the faster than light system that couldn't possibly ever exist, yet it did, because if such a system ever existed then the conservation of energy principle would break down and we could all have abundant amounts of energy without leveraging our trillions of $ investment in fossil fuels and other hazardous petrochemicals. Gone would be industry, and teh rampant and runaway control of the american and "democratic" state. Gone would be the null-enterprise of deception, and born could be the real free-enterprise, for all meaning of the intensive word, FREE. This is what had to be slain by Radio Corporation America. Slain must the multiple loaded flat top antenna of 1.57C longitudinal dielectric propogations, and kept the billions of times more inefficient hertzian transverse einstein 1.0C rhombic D transmitter. Slain and killed, destroyed and vanquished is the faster than light waves, and heralded is the inefficient and deceitful, the destructive and the life destroyer rhombic D hertzian einstein 1.0C waves, which ruin the chromosomal life of all plants and animals. 100% mutation with some seeds. Shocking. There will be no faster than light on this earth R.C.A and Sarnoff hum. Russia and other states had different plans.

    Me and the other forward thinking heretics, we make the current laws of tomorrow, that their future scientists will hold so dear. But true innovators, and inductive thinkers know, their thoughts will one day be that of an old science, that the new heretics will replace, and their future kin will hold onto the past idea like wolves and hyaenas yet again. This holding onto the old past heretic scientists' ideas, it is the highest insanity. For what of todays that build tomorrow? You are ignorant of them, and the future, and even the ancient past. Shame on you.

    A charge which most people on this forum are guilty, whom have chosen to slander the thread without truly understanding it. Shame on you.

    My theory shows how gravity is NOT caused by mass. That gravity is CAUSED by the cosmic rays traveling through into the earth 1000's of miles, which causes the EFFECT of gravity in the mass. Without the external cosmic equal and opposite force, there would be no equal and opposite gravity. This process of gravity creation in dense atomic structures at the centre of the earth is caused in the same way that light rays are caused by the solar rays hitting radium, or other radioactive material.

    Once sufficiently shielded, the radioactivity of the material (radium light ray), and/or it's gravity structure is completely negligent to masses creation of radioactivity, light, and gravity.

    Behold the true meaning of science. To account properly for these forces. Not to wildly discredit the inductive approach I have used - and worse, using poorly thought models of inventive science that fail to account for the processes that have been given time and time again.

    Science is at the beginning of a revolution. And it doesn't matter what you think. Because the super conductive high temperature liquid's I have been working with , and it's new kind of magnetism. Appears to already have been discovered.

    "A quantum liquid state" these scientists harp, well, if they want to call it that, it's fine with me, but i've been experimenting with it for quite some time now. As well as curving electrons and light in iron structure. It matters little what the attempts to subvert my work cause now, as the body of science itself, since the end of 2012 have officially discovered what Leedskalnin discovered circa 1945, what Tesla discovered circa 1896 and what the pyramid builders discovered circa 11500- 16,000 BC.

    instantaneous action, bye bye equal and opposite forces, byebye conservation, byebye relativity, byebye einstein. This will be a permanent adjustment to society when people realize that space-time DOES NOT EXIST as a primary function, only as a secondary invention to explain atomic events. What I have been working with is not just atomic, but sub atomic.

    Now you know why Einstein always had a problem with it, he was at least smart enough to understand that it went against everything he believed. Exactly that, everything he believed. He died without showing he known a way it could exist without violating his most coveted law. though it seems scientists at MIT are well on their way to doing this, and I commend them, for when they do it without adam bull, or jon de pew, or jeremy stride, or eric dollard, or edward leedskalnin or nikola tesla, it will not change the truth. It will only seek to confirm our statements. If not today, then one day.


    Energy is free. All of it. It's all wireless, and like gravity, light, radiation, consists of north and south poles, everything does. These are not my claims, but ancient ones and the more modern ones of Nikola Tesla and Edward Leedskalnin. People should do their research before discrediting me, as they are discrediting the proven works of the genius Tesla, Leedskalnin and Dollard, and there are now many publications carrying stories of faster than light and instantaneous transmission or strange instantaneous transfer. When the inventor of radio himself suggested it and said that he had created an apparatus where his waves were 1.57 times faster than light in 1896, and claiming later on he had found a way to transmit data at an infinite velocity (quote "completely regardless of distance"). What of this?

    Or perhaps the Bolinas facility of Marconi using these darn 1.57C non-existent waves? Yes, at 1.57 times the speed of light, and they used them for 4 years between 1914 and 1917, until the military and government took-over Marconi and radio and monopolized it for themselves. What of it? Only ignorance to be found here in planet know it all avalon?

    Unbelievable? It's just the truth. I'm trying to give you people it back but many of you have been brainwashed by inventive thinking.

    Do not let your own humanity fall on your own deaf ears.

    Best Wishes,
    Adam Bull
    Last edited by 7redorbs; 3rd January 2013 at 15:03.

  17. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to 7redorbs For This Post:

    Dennis Leahy (3rd January 2013), Gardener (5th January 2013), Grumpy Cat (3rd January 2013), mosquito (5th January 2013), Patrikas (5th January 2013), sandy (5th January 2013), SnowyOwl (5th January 2013), Swan (3rd January 2013)

  18. Link to Post #110
    United States Avalon Member Dennis Leahy's Avatar
    Join Date
    14th January 2011
    Location
    North Carolina
    Language
    English
    Age
    72
    Posts
    6,865
    Thanks
    48,684
    Thanked 50,145 times in 5,941 posts

    Default Re: Tap on, Tap off, the tapper.

    I still say, give Adam Bull (7redorbs) a podium and the benefit of the doubt.

    Bill did not poop on this, he said
    Quote Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
    -------

    Like Paul, as a formally trained physicist and mathematician I'm not qualified or able to comment on many of these concepts. I simply don't understand them, and it would be cheap and deceptive if I were to pretend that I did.

    But having said that: I do remember in Robert Collins' book Exempt From Disclosure, there was a very credible report towards the end of the book from a black projects physicist in Los Alamos who had said that in order to back-engineer the ET craft at their disposal, they had to start learning physics again from scratch, discarding all the concepts and constructs which they all believed they knew and understood. (my paraphrase)
    I also think it is fair to say that Adam has not explained the concepts well enough for:
    1.) anyone who has studied physics, and feels they have a grounding in physics laws. This could be the toughest audience to explain contradictory concepts to - especially if any of the "laws" are wrong.
    2.) non-scientists, and/or those without a grounding in physics concepts

    Take that as a challenge, and as constructive criticism. Go back to the most basic concept required as a foundation for your thought process, and explain it and refine your explanation until it is understood (at least by some here), and then move on to the next building-block in the concept. Don't get frustrated. Or, to say it better, don't let frustration stop you - let it simply be a sign that you need to re-refine your explanation or that you did not go back to a basic enough level to provide a solid foundation for explaining the concept. If you have truth, let nothing stop you. If you have truth that is meant to push science - especially applied physics as it relates to "free energy" - forward, then it is probably why you incarnated on Earth at this time. Don't stop.

    Dennis


  19. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Dennis Leahy For This Post:

    Eram (5th January 2013), Gardener (5th January 2013), Grumpy Cat (3rd January 2013), meeradas (3rd January 2013), mosquito (5th January 2013), Patrikas (5th January 2013), PurpleLama (3rd January 2013), sandy (4th January 2013), Swan (3rd January 2013)

  20. Link to Post #111
    UK Avalon Member Grumpy Cat's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th November 2012
    Location
    Hull, UK
    Age
    36
    Posts
    68
    Thanks
    64
    Thanked 309 times in 60 posts

    Default Re: Tap on, Tap off, the tapper.

    Though I have no background in Physics, all I can say is keep doing what you're doing. Keep seeking the truth - if your ideas have merit, eventually they will be heard by those willing to listen. I just hope that, if you are indeed 'on the right track' in regards to this, you/your ideas aren't swallowed up by the government in an attempt to keep the world stuck in it's current paradigm.

    The world needs more free thinkers.

  21. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Grumpy Cat For This Post:

    Dennis Leahy (3rd January 2013), mosquito (5th January 2013), sandy (4th January 2013)

  22. Link to Post #112
    Avalon Member Tesseract's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th October 2012
    Posts
    834
    Thanks
    1,740
    Thanked 3,418 times in 744 posts

    Default Re: Tap on, Tap off, the tapper.

    Quote Posted by Dennis Leahy (here)


    I also think it is fair to say that Adam has not explained the concepts well enough for:


    Dennis
    In science, this often signifies that the person does not understand what they are talking about.

  23. Link to Post #113
    United States Administrator ThePythonicCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Language
    English
    Age
    78
    Posts
    30,922
    Thanks
    37,979
    Thanked 155,322 times in 23,776 posts

    Default Re: Tap on, Tap off, the tapper.

    Quote Posted by Dennis Leahy (here)
    I also think it is fair to say that Adam has not explained the concepts well enough for:
    1.) anyone who has studied physics, and feels they have a grounding in physics laws. This could be the toughest audience to explain contradictory concepts to - especially if any of the "laws" are wrong.
    2.) non-scientists, and/or those without a grounding in physics concepts
    There is a third group, Dennis.

    Those who, while they in some way studied conventional math, science and physics earlier in their life, neither accept conventional theories now because they are conventional, nor accept alternatives simply because they are anti-conventional. Rather they trust in an underlying way of thinking, perceiving, discussing and building shared understandings of the universe we live in, a way that transcends such conventions.

    This not a debate over whether the conventional or unconventional views are more correct. There are diversity of both kinds of views, and either deep flaws or worse fatal confusions in many.

    The question is not which mountain we climb, but how we "walk" as individuals, and how we communicate and cooperate in the communities we form.

    Those most willing and able to work with others on improving our understandings of physics will be found in this third group.
    My quite dormant website: pauljackson.us

  24. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to ThePythonicCow For This Post:

    Cristian (4th January 2013), Dennis Leahy (4th January 2013), Hervé (4th January 2013), Jean-Luc (4th January 2013), Patrikas (5th January 2013), Whiskey_Mystic (4th January 2013)

  25. Link to Post #114
    France Honored, Retired Member. Hervé passed on 13 November 2024.
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,763
    Thanks
    60,315
    Thanked 96,081 times in 15,483 posts

    Default Re: Tap on, Tap off, the tapper.

    Although not from this thread but another one regarding the publishing of Adam's book: http://www.lulu.com

  26. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    7redorbs (5th January 2013), Jean-Luc (4th January 2013), ThePythonicCow (4th January 2013)

  27. Link to Post #115
    Belgium Avalon Member Jean-Luc's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th January 2011
    Location
    near Brussels
    Age
    64
    Posts
    628
    Thanks
    5,382
    Thanked 5,182 times in 591 posts

    Default Re: Tap on, Tap off, the tapper.

    @Adam

    Although I have only skimmed through this thread for the time being (I will surely come back) I believe I understand your mixed feelings and the anger that perspires through some of your posts after your many, many years of research, trials & errors, efforts, writing, etc... when faced to the wall of skepticism of conventional knowledge.

    I am with you about the puzzle of the energy required to have an electron spin around a proton for eons. It is an argument I have myself be using for ages to those rebutting the possibility of limitless energy.

    I think you should be most interested by Keshe's theories that seem to very much be in line whith what you are saying.

    So could I kindly suggest you to approach the Keshe Foundation which recently upgraded its own forum with the very same V-Bulletin software engine as this one on Avalon, and is in full developments of study groups based on individuals like you (and very much anyone else also really interested to make the ball rolling).

    Incidentally, here is what Merhan Keshe had to say on the speed of light which should be of interest to you:
    (‘mafs’ stands for magnetic fields)

    Quote Can matter travel faster than the speed of light and if yes

    Matters can and do travel faster than the speed of light by factor of 10 to the power several 10s of thousands.

    This meaning the present assumption that the light is the ultimate speed of motion is incorrect and thus the famous equation of relativity would not hold.

    This reality will change the truth about the present one track assumption that the speed of light is the ultimate speed.

    In fact on can say that the speed of light is the ultimate speed in matter environment mafs and not in all environments mafs , and hence for example the speed of light in the principal matter mafs environment has speed which are up to factor of 10 to power of several thousands faster than the of speed of light in the matter environment.

    Thus once one has matter which is in principal matter environment then the same matter will travel at the higher speed and hence the same matter will be observe the speed at this environment magnetic field strength.

    In reality that the matter has a speed of light is due to the fact that once the lights speed passes this limit then the matter will brake its own light barrier and enters a new dimension of higher order magnetic fields strength.

    Thus the matter can travel with speed of principals matter light once its is carried within this higher order matter mafs.

    Therefore one can travel the span of universe in times which are unimaginable once one cane cocoon oneself with the higher order mafs strength . Then the speed of light in matter environment and the mass of the matter become irrelevant and the equation of relativity becomes obsolete.

    For the ones who did not understood, read the new book and the ones who did understand, then that is to say the speed of light of principal matter (antimatter) are much faster than the speed of light in matter the like of human matter world, thus in every level of matter there is a light and the observation of light in that magnetic fields strength is Magravs environment dependent.

    Thus as the man is made of matter, then in principal mafs strength he will and can travel at this speed and as the matter is matter mafs strength dependent , thus its energy is and can not be calculated to be its environments’ speed of light dependent

    Or in simpler language, rap your craft with principal mafs strength and then travel the universe with the speed of present matter light multiplied by factor of several thousands times. (Any one fancy trip to Mars in five minutes, where most of the time is due to re-entries and exit from atmosphere). Well come to the true world of universal speeds of motion.

    M.T. Keshe - June 2011
    http://forum.keshefoundation.org/sho...ull=1#post1078
    which confirms and goes beyond Marconi's system you were alluding to:

    Quote Posted by 7redorbs (here)
    In any case, the Marconi System is not famously known for the fact that it exhibited wave forms that travelled 1.5645161290322580645161290322581 faster than the speed of light. Yes, that is right, and you likely will have never heard it before. You can check by reading Eric Dollards books on the subject of Tesla.
    Keshe is going his own way in a rather original manner.

    (1) Providing his technology / concepts for free to any government that makes the request (60 % of governments worldwide have done so in the last couple of months)
    (2) Opening things up to the public via study groups through his forum as of... now : http://forum.keshefoundation.org/for...on-Study-group

    I believe you could become a first class & outstanding member and that the collaboration could be very fruitful.

    I think this is in line with what you are saying:

    Quote Posted by 7redorbs (here)
    Bill Ryan, I appreciate you taking the time to reply to this thread but ultimately I would not ask people to buy technology for a new future, I would ask them to study. Study hard. Find the truth. It is so much stranger than fiction.
    The whole thing (of sharing and developing the knowledge with the public via the new forum) is still in its infancy (and bound to be somewaht frustrating at times) but is promising. It also could definitely receive a big BUMP should the announcement about the delivery of (a limited release of) the Foundation generator be indeed on schedule (i.e. end of Feb 2013, for the time being: http://forum.keshefoundation.org/sho...tion-Generator)


    Last, if you don’t know where to start with Keshe, why not have a go with Kimberley’s (Avalon & Keshe forum member) excellent recent interview here :

    https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post598516

    In any case, thanks a lot for your efforts. I’ll be back.
    Last edited by Jean-Luc; 4th January 2013 at 15:52.

  28. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Jean-Luc For This Post:

    7redorbs (5th January 2013), Gardener (5th January 2013), mosquito (5th January 2013), sandy (5th January 2013)

  29. Link to Post #116
    Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    8th December 2012
    Posts
    126
    Thanks
    148
    Thanked 402 times in 101 posts

    Default Re: Tap on, Tap off, the tapper.

    @Adam I am sorry, I do not have the time right now to read the whole thread. But it's worth it to hold on this wild impatient horses and believe me I do understand the exasperation one's feel when running against the Wind, the Institution and Mental Cohesion itself. I am ending almost two years of Nikola Tesla Life via docs in many languages and there is indeed a lot more than what is known. For instance concerning the Teslascope of Arthur H. Matthews who has spend his life up here in Québec. Maybe taking a pause and come back in a week or so. fyi, there was 3 more Tesla towers Up here, one in Sanford, one in Desbiens and the third one in Tadoussac. There is indeed a lot of infos on those and I shall come back on this pretty soon. Meanwhile some info (Matthews audio) Arthur Mathews - Tesla's Last Assistant 1-3 https://youtube.com/watch?v=Y5gBXDvhXBs

  30. Link to Post #117
    Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    8th December 2012
    Posts
    126
    Thanks
    148
    Thanked 402 times in 101 posts

    Default Re: Tap on, Tap off, the tapper.

    Quote Posted by 7redorbs (here)
    Hi everyone

    Thank you, thank you ever so much. Remember, I don't want anything, or to advertise my work at the above site Paul. I know there is a lot of good information there that has taken me so so long to make the progress towards. People who would like to understand the technical details in a more simple way than the SFTS Lectures (they are intended with scientists and engineers), then perhaps the Ham Radio SBARC talk that Eric gives is more suitable.

    It is where I started with Dollard, and as soon as I saw it, I knew I'd discovered someone, and something very very special indeed.

    This means that the EFFECT LEADS AHEAD OF the cause in time. Or more simply, the cause is ahead in time of the effect, and lags after the thing that it seems to be producing. This blows all science out of the water. All of it. That's why it's classified, eh?

    It is also not entirely simple, I had to revise the above paragraph about 5 times, to explain fully what is going on. It is simplifiable, and it is my hope I am doing that enough for people of all walks of life understanding the importance of Tesla, Leedskalnins, Reich & Dollards work, and many many other brilliant human beings that still exist today. Time I believe does run short though.

    If I am right about this particularly, it does a lot more than disprove electrons, or demonstrate faster than light. It shows that the faster than light waves, operate in the counterspace that Eric Dollard writes about in his books. The wave (my cause) appears to propogate backwards in time, so that the leading effect, to lagging cause, can come before, and meet my closing terminal. The way it does this is by traveling upwards towards my switch, before it has been closed.

    I have caught this nearly 100 times, in about 1000 - 2000 different types of shot. I need bettery camera's and people need to do the work themselves now. Either the electricity is alive and is able to anticipate my actions, or electrical wave are propagating forwards and backwards through time. Or, I am a mad scientist, perhaps, that is quite mistaken. (accepting).

    I hope it finds you well and this meets the unexpected thirst and interest my post seems to have raised on this forum. I have to say I am so very glad.

    ERIC DOLLARD @ SBARC:


    MY VIDEO DEMONSTRATION UPLOADED TODAY FOR PROJECT AVALON TO SHOW EFFECT PRECEDING CAUSE, I have named this effect the "Dollard Tesla Leedskalnin effect"


    e.g. I don't want credit. I want patents, and the lie of energy scarcity to end. We have electrical waves which are propogating forwards and backwards in time, at least, if I am right- and if I am right, then the world is due for a revolution of a socio-political and scientific kind never seen in this century. Or rather, for the last 100 years it should have been undergoing it such, if it was not for the unwelcome , immoral and unfair interference of the military government "lucifer group" since about the inception of RCA.

    Thank you, Thank you all, so much. I promise I am not making this up, and I promise if you look into it you will discover there is much that we will have to do to save this technology for being destroyed, by groups like Commonweal, R.C.A and the military-government complex, which took control of the development and licensing of this technology, as well as a patent monopoly in 1914.

    That silly old story "if we had it we'd be using it story" peddled by the ministry of skepticism et al, becomes tired and wasted; as I have outlined it's assumption : that there wasn't a documented government-military conspiracy to take precedence of command and control of the technology.

    Thanking you all again, you have lit a bright light today,

    Best,
    A
    It is now a Consensus among ''Free Mindset People'' that information indeed precede its expressions.... But from what I gather from CERN and via Shamans experiences... This is made possible '' a priori' ' following a clear and resolute protocol or ritual. Snowy

  31. Link to Post #118
    United States Avalon Member Dennis Leahy's Avatar
    Join Date
    14th January 2011
    Location
    North Carolina
    Language
    English
    Age
    72
    Posts
    6,865
    Thanks
    48,684
    Thanked 50,145 times in 5,941 posts

    Default Re: Tap on, Tap off, the tapper.

    Quote Posted by SnowyOwl (here)
    Meanwhile some info (Matthews audio) Arthur Mathews - Tesla's Last Assistant 1-3 https://youtube.com/watch?v=Y5gBXDvhXBs
    Oh my, that is awful audio! When I turned it up loudly enough to hear the words, the static was chasing my ears around my head like a pack of hounds. My ears were going to commit VanGogh-kari, and I shut off the video just in time so my ears dropped the knife. I wonder if there is a transcript of that anywhere...

    Dennis


  32. Link to Post #119
    UK Avalon Member
    Join Date
    12th May 2012
    Posts
    131
    Thanks
    99
    Thanked 947 times in 126 posts

    Default Re: Tap on, Tap off, the tapper.

    Quote Posted by Dennis Leahy (here)
    Quote Posted by SnowyOwl (here)
    Meanwhile some info (Matthews audio) Arthur Mathews - Tesla's Last Assistant 1-3 https://youtube.com/watch?v=Y5gBXDvhXBs
    Oh my, that is awful audio! When I turned it up loudly enough to hear the words, the static was chasing my ears around my head like a pack of hounds. My ears were going to commit VanGogh-kari, and I shut off the video just in time so my ears dropped the knife. I wonder if there is a transcript of that anywhere...

    Dennis
    Dennis,

    Quite ironically there is a transcript of it in my book on page 300-305

    Here it is:

    Quote Tesla's Last Known Living Assistant's Recorded Statement
    < BEGINNING OF TAPE >
    In 1933 to 1943 by Arthur Mathews Province of Quebec, Canada.
    To understand properly the first part of the story you will need a map of the province of Quebec, Canada. It was early in Spring that Major Henry Sanford of New York City came to Quebec with a number of friends. One of these friends was Nikola Tesla. Major Sanford owned a large camp in the Quebec woods not far from a place called Lake Edwards. Major Sanford invited me to go with them to his camp. We met in Quebec City at the old Lake Saint John railway station. The Lake Saint John railway at that time operated the railway between Quebec City and Chicoutimi at Lake Saint John. Major Sanford had a private train consisting of two coaches and a baggage car. The baggage car was loaded with electrical equipment. One item of that equipment was a 75 KW generator set. This generator was driven with a gasoline motor due to the fact that Major Sanford's camp was located at about almost 10 miles from the railway station and the only way to get there was by means of a foot path through the bush and a fortarge on which canoes could carry materials. And of course this meant that everything that we had had to be carried by hand. And then to make this more convenient, most of the heavy materials such as the 75 KW generators had been taken apart and packed in small containers.
    We left that morning from Quebec at around 8:00 and I don't remember exactly what time it was when we arrived at Sanford station but it was around noon I believe. Arriving at Sanford station, the train was placed on a siding and we unloaded the baggage car. And from there I will try to remember all the members in the party as we arrived at Sanford station. Major Sanford and Mrs. Sanford, there was a trained nurse Miss Kidd, and Tesla and myself and twelve Indian guides. The head guide or chief was a man named Gro Louis. The material was divided up amongst us and we all had as much as we could carry. Some of the parcels were very heavy and required two guides to carry them. There was no particular rush for we could go as slow or as fast as we pleased, admiring the beautiful woods as we walked along. So finally we arrived at the camp sometime late that evening.
    301
    My first job on arriving at the camp was to put the 75 KW generator together. When I completed the power plant we then built an exact model of a Tesla transformer which he had built at Colorado in 1898. I don't remember the exact date but I believe this was in 1898. This transformer was to transmit power through the earth without using any wires. After the transmitting transformer had been built, we then built three other transformers to receive the power, which would be sent from this big transformer. The first one was located about ten miles away in the bush, the second transformer was located at Lake Saint John near Desbiens and the third transformer was built later on at Tadoussac which was on the river Saint Lawrence.
    For the purpose of making any required adjustments Tesla first used the nearby transformer which was about ten miles from the transmitter. Power was then sent to this ten mile away transformer and the power sent was considerable and convinced Major Sanford that the idea was practical. After proving to Major Sanford that his wireless power idea was workable, Tesla then turned his attention to some new things.
    The first thing was radar and the war preventing idea. The radar was in fact part of this war preventer. It was the guide. TV was demonstrated and a voice operated typewriter and other things, which I will mention later on. Tesla had offered his idea of radar to the American government but whoever it was who investigated the idea did not think it was practical and so it was turned down.
    One of the showpieces of Sanford was a gold wire aerial. This was used to receive short wave programs. This gold wire aerial was actually constructed by the Indian. I showed him how to do it and it was placed on top of two tall trees, which were about sixty-five feet apart. It was a gold plated aerial as I said. A cage type aerial which was used on the battleships at that time with twelve wires separated in the middle by a ring twelve inches in diameter tapering down to each end to two inches. At Sanford I constructed a number of short wave receivers which the major presented to some friends and the local hospital at Lake Edwards. Dr. Creed was one and he also presented one of the receivers to Gro Louis, the Indian guide. I should say the chief of the Indian guides. Tesla also built a microwave receiver, which were very small indeed.
    One of the ideas of Tesla was a metal analyzer. This was very useful in finding out what certain pieces of metal were. I first used this at Ottawa in 1969. There was a large lump, chunk of metal had been discovered on the beach near Neuville and this piece of metal weighing something like three thousand pounds was taken to Valcartier Camp where they tried to find out what it was. It was a kind of a mystery and they were not able to find out what it was at Bacarte and then it was shipped to Ottawa to the national research council where they also did everything possible to find out what it was but they were not able to do that. Needless to say they could not be certain of what it was. The story went around that it fell from the sky and it was a part of a spaceship or something or other of that kind but no one could say exactly what it was. And so, in 1969 I was invited to go to Ottawa and test this with the tester, with the Tesla analyzer. I had, I still have in fact this invention of Tesla. Well, to shorten the story, I certainly found out what the piece of metal was using the Tesla analyzer.
    Another wonder, it was a small portable TV machine. This TV machine could see through stone walls. In other words, like a camera, a special kind of camera, you pointed it at a wall and
    302
    it could see anything on the other side of the wall. It recorded this on a tape of some kind and then you wind it up and you could transmit this picture which had been picked up through a stone wall and send it to a small screen. This screen of Sanford's was mounted on the wall and it looked like a colored picture of some kind. I said, in other tapes, ah, oil painting TV because when it was operating that's exactly what it looked like to me because it was like a picture in a nice frame on the wall and there were no visible wires to it but Tesla had a small box that he was operating from the table and as he operated this it could change these pictures that were seemingly coming from nowhere on this frame of some kind and it looked like, as I say, it looked like an oil painting and I had called it an oil painting TV. He had a camera with him during our trip through the bush and he had pictures recorded of us and the guide carrying parcels walking through the forest and he sent this picture to this oil painting picture and as I say it very much resembled an oil painting because it was in color. That's the first I had heard of the TV, and remember, this was in 1932.
    Another marvel was a small recording machine, something like our modern tape recorders but it had no moving parts. It had no tape or anything else. It simply recorded and would play back your recording at a push of a button just exactly like our tape recorders but it would record for an hour or so and play back, as I said, what was recorded without the use of tape or any moving parts whatever. There was no motor in it.
    Many of these ideas had been conceived by Tesla many years before but he did not have the opportunity to develop them and here at Sanford's it was a beautiful place, a magnificent place, a beautiful workshop which had been constructed by Major Sanford, well equipped with almost everything you could think of.
    Another fearful fantastic idea which Tesla developed with Sanford was his dark idea. This would also prevent wars. But would it? I believe that this could also be used to make war because the equipment could be carried in an airplane and it would float over a city and put it to dark. Not a bit of light anywhere would show. This is, to me, a most fearful idea. You turn on a switch and everything goes dark. There would be no electric lights, no lights in your car, your headlights would not show, if you strike a match it would burn but it would not show any light. No form of light whatever, instantly, the moment the switch is closed. So then Tesla said that if war started and the switch was turned on, the war would not be able to continue because nobody would be able to see. I wonder how it would be? I wonder if it would ever be used? Can you imagine what would happen in a big city, say at noontime, suddenly, not a pick of light anywhere; the sun would suddenly die out. Headlights of cars would not turn on and so it would be a terrible mess. And this apparatus, according to Tesla, could be put to work and control whole nations, either a city, or a village, a town, or the whole nation. All of America, all of Canada, of a press of a button. Is it a good idea? I really don't know.
    Apart from the very big things used all over the world, inventions of Tesla, there are a number of little things. Very important little things. For instance, the ignition system which, I believe, is used in almost every car in the world. It was invented by Tesla many years ago. But certainly all of the cars that I can think of use the same identical ignition system which was invented by Tesla at the beginning of the century and no one has been able to find a better system. The speedometer, which is also used in almost every car in the world, also invented by Tesla. So was the ship's log. Most ships in the world use the Tesla Log.
    303
    The hydro system, that is to say, the method for driving generators to produce electricity from waterfalls, was one of the great inventions of Tesla. The first power plant in the entire world was Niagara Falls, which was built by the Westinghouse Company in 1895. It's one of the few things, which had Tesla's name on it up to recent years.
    Tesla also developed a number of ideas for helping overcome pain in the human being such as sciatica, rheumatism and all kinds of things like that and he uses a small electrical vibrator.
    Another one of his great inventions was the electric car. He built the first one in 1897 and he drove from New York City to Buffalo, New York and it had an average speed of 94 miles an hour. This car, if it was built today, would cost one-cent a mile to operate and it would cost practically nothing for repairs because apart from the mechanical parts, that is to say the wheels and the steering apparatus where they would compose the only moving parts, the engine in this electric car is a small alternating current motor which runs at the tremendous speed of thirty thousand rpm and this is reduced to eighteen hundred by means of a fluid transmission, also the invention of Tesla. The whole electric car is a magnificent piece of work and it could be put in use today and save the public hundreds of billions of dollars now wasted in gasoline and oil and spare parts. I could give a few details about this electric car. You see, it does not use a storage battery. It uses the special primary battery and if you know anything about primary batteries you'll know that the only part of a primary battery which fails is the negative plate. Any little dry cells you use for your flashlight, for instance, is the zinc which gives way, and when that gives way the battery goes dead. Well now, Tesla invented a completely new kind of primary battery and in this primary battery, if the negative plate wears out, it can be replaced even by a child in a few seconds. And the battery, when installed in this electric car, will run that car five hundred miles before the battery needs to be attended to. And when the battery does need to be attended to it would take you ten minutes to remedy whatever is going on and the spare parts are all in the trunk. You have enough spare parts to keep that battery running twelve months of the year. You do not have to stop at the service station. You could run five hundred miles for instance at seventy five miles per hour, if you were allowed to do it of course, but you could run this car say fifty or sixty miles an hour right across the country and probably not have to stop more than fifteen minutes to attend to the batteries.
    Well, some time in the future somebody will no doubt build this Tesla electric car but it will be when we have no more fuel oil or gasoline? I don't know how long the present oil supply will last. It certainly will not last forever so we will have to have other means of transportation. Would it be by the Tesla electric car?
    If you have read my book, The Wall of Light, you will know the first part is the life story of Tesla. This story was written by Tesla himself and you will note in this story that Tesla gives full credit to God for his ability to discover some amazing new ideas in the Bible. As I have mentioned before the microwave comes from the fourth chapter of Revelations. In many places in his work Tesla mentions the fact that he was inspired by Bible study to conceive his amazing ideas. His idea of the alternating current comes from the book of Matthew. In other words from the Trinity. Tesla explains that his microwave, for instance, is not what many others think it is. It is not a wave, it is a dimension. The actual dimension of the beam. Tesla
    304
    clearly states that his microwave is a beam which grows smaller. But he states that it's diameter is smaller than the hair of your head.
    Another idea of Tesla is a locator. This will help you to find anything underground. It will help you to find metal deposits or liquid deposits such as island water. I wrote a story about this locator many years ago which was published in one of the radio magazines of that time and a man out west read my story and he wrote to me and he said that his father had died suddenly and left his money buried someplace on their three hundred acre farm and did I think that Tesla's locator would help him to find it? Well I wrote back and told him that sure, if you can build the Tesla locator you certainly would be able to find it if your father put it in a metal box or a metal lined box. Because if it was in a wooden box and the money was in paper then it would be very difficult to find it but if the money was in cache, coins or if it was in a money box then I was fairly sure he would be able to find it. Well, to make the story shorter I sent him a diagram of this locator. This man built the locator and he found the money.
    Another marvelous idea of Tesla was what he called the translator. This was not a very large affair either. It was something about the size of a small tape recorder and it had many buttons on it and you pushed one of these buttons to translate a language. In other words the button would be of Japanese for instance, you'd push the Japanese button and it would translate the Japanese into whatever language you wanted such as English, French, Chinese, what not and so on.
    Tesla also had a small gadget, which was a speed warner. This was about as big as a pocket wallet and once you were driving the car for instance he would set it and if you went too fast over the speed limit it would yell loudly and tell you if you were going too fast or not. There is no connection to the car whatever. You simply could carry this like a purse in your pocket. You set it for instance at fifty miles per hour and if you went over fifty miles an hour it would yell out.
    Also at Sanford's, Tesla built what he called a gravity motor. This was a tripod of three tall trees, the logs of three tall trees, latched together at the top and in the center of the top part there is a pulley and over this pulley was a rope and you handed this rope that goes down a shaft at the base and a weight on the other end and when the weight was coming down it was turning the shaft and you had free power. Free power, which would last as long as the rock was falling down, turning the shaft. Leonardo de Vinci was said to have built such a power plant. It was absolutely free and very useful but one difficult point was the fact that you had to wind it up.
    Many people write to me asking the question where can they find the best books concerning the life of Tesla? I have been answering letters like that for many years, since the early twenties in fact, and I give the same answer to everybody that writes to me. Where can they find information, which is true about Tesla? Well, you can find it in copies of his patents. You can get those patents or copies of the patents in the Washington patent office, Washington D.C., United States of America. Now there are also lectures and articles, which Tesla had published before 1943, in other words before he died. Anything published in recent years might be a little bit altered, I don't know. I don't say that the present day publications are altered but if you want all the truth without any guess work get copies of the original papers, lectures, articles,
    305
    and patents, and his life story which is published in the first part of my book The Wall of Light.
    Tesla was a man who minded his own business and wanted other people to mind theirs. He did not like gossip. His private life was his life and it belonged to no one else. He did not interfere with other people's business and he did not want anyone to interfere with his. Tesla was a down to earth kind of man. He was a mechanical engineer.
    < TAPE CUTOFF >

    Best Wishes,
    Adam

  33. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to 7redorbs For This Post:

    Gardener (5th January 2013), Hervé (5th January 2013), Jean-Luc (5th January 2013), SnowyOwl (5th January 2013)

  34. Link to Post #120
    UK Avalon Member
    Join Date
    12th May 2012
    Posts
    131
    Thanks
    99
    Thanked 947 times in 126 posts

    Default Re: Tap on, Tap off, the tapper.

    Regarding the scientists that have commented about me "not knowing what I am talking about".

    Might I refer you to the fundamental question of Einsteins relativity. What causes the negative charged electron to orbit perpetually around it's positively charged protons and neutrally charged neutron particles?

    Simple question. And - if the "so-called" scientist's cant answer this simple and fundamental question, then perhaps they don't know what they are talking about. Other than repeating Einsteins assertions true parrot fashion. If they cannot account for the model with logical reasoning and must resort to a mathematical theory that LACKS fully the explanation of the thing it is modeling, then, perhaps scientists are less wise than they make themselves out to be.

    Quite simply - the maths is right. Of course it is. The math's is always right. Newtons maths, correct. The greeks math's. Quite correct. Galileo's math, quite correct. Bohr's and Rutherford, Thompson's, All their maths, correct.

    It was not the maths that was the problem. It was the conceptually wrong ideas the maths was based on, that failed to account for the full model. In this case the perpetual motion of the negatively charged orbiting electron.

    It's a simple question science men. I double dare you to try and answer it without making a fool out of yourselves, that is what some here would see me do. But what of this fundamental question I ask? What of it? If you cannot say how, with the math's, then there is something missing from it.

    Relativity

    The only thing that is missing from this conceptually incomplete theory is what is missing from all conceptually incorrect theories - that is, some important piece of information. This is as it has always been in developing sciences - the case of an incomplete science; the missing piece of information is always fundamentally obstructing and preventing the correct conceptualization of the process and model being described, and results in an incomplete mathematical description.

    Mathematical description of a theory and function model

    The mathematics is admirable and eloquent, and quite correct. But then again A=A is correct, but it is conceptually flawed in that it tells us almost nothing. That is, an incomplete and incorrect conceptualization, always results in an inaccurate mathematical equation, which is always bearing the same mark of incompletion, such as in this case missing some fundamental thing, and the resultant inability to explain something such as perpetual electron orbits around positive and neutral charges and their source of energy, being one of those fundamental things.

    "Einstein quackers" and the contradicting truth in Experimentation show non Kirchoffian , Non einsteinian Non conservatory particle streams

    E=MC^2 is quite correct, but if you can transmit an ampere into the ground without drawing power from the electricity supply, because it is TOTALLY RESONANT - More than just Einstein and newton go out the window. But the fundamental laws of conservation itself.


    The Quantum Wave Function
    and how the electron and the atom are inherently unobservable

    This is a deep problem of quantum wave functions that is truly yet to be fathomed, it stems from the Heisenberg uncertainty principle and the work of Dr. Schrodinger. Indeed a fundamental physics that shows that measuring the velocity cannot be acheived at the same moment of measuring the position, therefore fundamentally it is impossible to know the full properties of universal atomic theory, according to Heisenberg wave function principles. According to the wave function principles the atom is "INHERENTLY UNOBSERVABLE" quote unquote.

    Scientific Facts about the Electron

    So the model of the electron, by this fundamental precept, repeat, the model of the electron - is completely obligatory and assumed. Nobody has ever seen an electron. And that's a fact supported by the Uncertainty principle and quantum wave function. Admirably. It's a scientific fact.

    A challenge to know it all scientists

    Added, still waiting on the so-called science men's explanation of the perpetual electron orbits. I expect it will be a long time. (NON SCIENTISTS: note silence speaks volumes from "scientists".)


    Best,
    a
    Last edited by 7redorbs; 5th January 2013 at 04:03.

  35. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to 7redorbs For This Post:

    Gardener (5th January 2013), Jean-Luc (5th January 2013), mosquito (5th January 2013), Patrikas (5th January 2013)

Page 6 of 15 FirstFirst 1 6 15 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts