Tap on, Tap off, the tapper.

[7redorbs]

Gravity is not caused by mass, neither is radioactivity.

"Einsteiners" are taught that Radioactivity comes from mass. But it doesn't, and that is a scientific and engineering fact. Behold the wreckless ideas of the Einsteiners.

They take the radioactive components like Uranium and slam them together, assuming that the distinct instability of both are caused by "unstable mass". "Einsteiners" don't see the problem with this concept, you see.

Einsteiners continue throwing uranium together to produces vast quantities of atomic energy - the grail of the einsteiner - the problem of course being that the instability and radioactivity activity in general is not caused by the mass, as is the same case with gravity, therefore they are throwing these unstable things together, and are getting energy from the instability of the mass, not realising that the only reason why the mass produces the energy from the radioactivity instability was caused by COSMIC RAYS making the isotope unstable to begin to release its atomic energy.

The einsteiner goes on chuckling huge parts of uranium together until everyone is dead. They repeat like a parrot "this is controlled by the instability of the mass" - here are the measurements. But when someone comes out with some research showing that the instability of mass is caused by cosmic rays, they conveniently ignore it.

They continue throwing bits of uranium together 100% sure that the mass itself is unstable, and that the mass does not have a cause to it's radioactivity. They create giant millions of ampere electrical effects from these chunks of uranium, thanking the atomic "instability" for it, when the atomic instability thanks the cosmic rays that makes it unstable.

This is distinctly why radium when sufficiently shielded from cosmic rays ceases to be radioactive altogether, or to produce light. The instability of radium's atoms is caused by cosmic rays. This is a scientific and engineering fact.

The einsteiners still throw their bits of radioactive unstable elements together to make the most giant and deadly explosions, they glory in it, and they thank the mass. But the mass wouldnt be unstable if it wasn't for the cosmic rays.

Those huge atomic reactions are governed by the cosmic rays, and not the mass.


Perhaps one day some "non einsteiners" will come along and realise this before we blow all ourselves up with our incompetence. The remarkable thing is a lot of this must surely be classified if correct, it is not as if people can be distinctly blamed for spreading propoganda of electromagnetism around. This was the doing of R.C.A since about 1917 in the massive global military government takeover, and the pan-american monopoly on electrical and radio technology.

I would say that instability of radioactive isotopes isnt caused by the mass, is a biggie, wouldn't you paul?

The glorious power of the "Einsteiners Hiroshima" can thank the cosmic rays that made the elements so unstable to chain react in that manner. Shocking. No wonder it is classified.

Humanity is given two choices, to be destroyed by their liberation (cosmic ray nuclear technology) or to destroy each other by their confinement, imprisonment and so-called energy crisis (the suppression of cosmic ray nuclear technology).

This is a sad story,


Best,
A

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by 7redorbs (here)
I am honestly speechless. Please do not continue to confuse this thread with this electromagnetic frolic,

I am pretty sure that most of us contributing to this thread agree that conventional science has missed the mark.

I am also pretty sure that both the contributors to, and the readers of, this thread agree that this is a very important topic.

But there comes a time when strenuous denunciations of all other explanations, even quite unconventional explanations such as those of Maurice Cotterell, combined with declarations of the importance of one's own work and protestations that one's own results have been proven have to be followed up with successfully communicated understandings to other interested readers of what actually is one's own theory.

[7redorbs]

An einsteiner tells you that mass can be unstable, hence radioactive. What he doesn't say is why the mass is unstable.

It is a fact he in fact does not know why, he just knows it is. He assumes that uranium will not become ultra unstable if a large GRB from a nearby supernovae comes by and increases the instability of the elements in a nuclear power station could destroy the earth and every living person on it.

Behold - the Einsteiner.

He would not stop there, he would trigger the whole darn event himself by trying to "prove whether this is so" - it is a very alarming and dangerous idea that unstable mass isnt the cause of atomic energy release.

Its a groundbreaking Technology For a New future, and that is all there is to it. The tenet of this technology for a new future is simple, understanding that atomic energy release is not caused by mass instability. and In fact the atomic energy release is caused by the instability of mass effect which is caused by cosmic rays.

IT is also a fact that this has been evidenced in the scientific literature. Unfortunately the Einsteiner has not put it together. One could argue, very fortunately the "einsteiner" has not got a hold of this idea,

All I can say is it is one I have tried to share, probably at great risk to myself, and humanity. What choice dowe have if it is between a prison of suppression and a risk of destroying earth with it without the suppression,

It is interesting to note I have spoken to several ex NASA engineers, and one current nasa engineer, and several nuclear power electrical experts about the whole thing, and the find the whole idea of my work frightening. They do not find it difficult to understand though and that is a sign of progress,

Best,
A

[noxon medem]

..
-

Thank you for this thread.

A lot of information and inspiration,
to study and digest. And then both
to meditate on and do experimental
projects on a simple workshop basis.
That is more or less where I am ..

Please keep this going.

Be well, Adam and all .

nm

PS.
If I should inject anything here,
Can you expand in the choice of
title to this thread :
"Tap on, Tap off, the tapper."

Is it all very simple, if one
just understand, or see ?

..
-

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by 7redorbs (here)
Gravity is not caused by mass, neither is gravity.

I was unable to make sense of the above quoted statement.

Posted by 7redorbs (here)
I would say that instability of radioactive isotopes isnt caused by the mass, is a biggie, wouldn't you paul?

I'm not clear what your depiction of "Einsteiners" has to do with Maurice Cotterell's work; perhaps you did not intend any such connection.

It may well be as you state that radioactive isotopes are not radioactive when sufficiently shielded ... I don't know ... could you provide reference to some results showing this? However, whether or not that is so doesn't tell me what is the nature and fundamental form of radioactivity.

If you shield me from oxygen or water, I soon will cease typing anything on this forum. Is that oxygen or water the cause of these printed words? Does the observation, even if demonstrated by careful lab results, that depriving me of oxygen or water stops my typing, help us to understand much about the nature of myself, or these words? I think not.

How is it that radioactive isotopes are radioactive under at least some conditions such as the presence of the sort of cosmic radiation we experience here on the earth's surface, but that other materials are not radioactive under the same conditions. Simply asserting that the cause of radioactivity is cosmic rays (even if cosmic rays are an essential trigger of radioactivity) doesn't help us understand the nature of radioactivity, nor help predict when materials will or will not be radioactive.

My previous several questions are still questions in my mind.

[eaglespirit]

Posted by noxon medem (here)
..
-

Thank you for this thread.

A lot of information and inspiration,
to study and digest. And then both
to meditate on and do experimental
projects on a simple workshop basis.
That is more or less where I am ..

Please keep this going.

Be well, Adam and all .

nm

PS.
If I should inject anything here,
Can you expand in the choice of
title to this thread :
"Tap on, Tap off, the tapper."

Is it all very simple, if one
just understand, or see ?

..
-

We're almost there, noxon medem, all-most there!

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by 7redorbs (here)
An einsteiner tells you that mass can be unstable, hence radioactive. What he doesn't say is why the mass is unstable.

It is a fact he in fact does not know why, he just knows it is. He assumes that uranium will not become ultra unstable if a large GRB from a nearby supernovae comes by and increases the instability of the elements in a nuclear power station could destroy the earth and every living person on it.

If a large gamma ray burst (GRB) put life on earth at grave risk by causing all our nuclear power stations to blow up, that would indeed be dire, and a risk we'd much like to understand ahead of time and avoid.

I agree with you that present main stream physics doesn't really explain why mass, energy, light, gravity, ... have the properties they do.

But, to be honest, I haven't found yet where you really explain that either. An assertion, even if true, and well it might be true, that the instability of radioactive matter depends on the rate of cosmic rays or gamma rays colliding with it, also does not really explain why. It is just an assertion, for which I hope you have some references, of an important correlation.

Correlation is not causation.

My earlier questions remain.

Could you put aside the outrage, the protestations, the denunciations, and the proclamations for a bit, and calmly tell us of your theoretical understandings, in a way that some few others of us (perhaps not myself, but some of us) can understand sufficiently well to begin engaging with you on the substance of your theories?

This would be most valuable if you could do that.

[eaglespirit]

Adam, Paul or anyone else now asking questions here are not trying to irritate you...we are on your side...we really are.
There are teams of people watching this play out...let us play it out with mutual respect.
We have been intentionally pulverized with the wrong information for a VERY long time now.
We want to bring to the world what you want to bring to the world with this.
We are with you!

[Ernie Nemeth]

The "electron" is a pet topic of mine at work. I'm an electrician by day, you see.

I've writen about this a bit before on other threads, but I like to argue how science really does not know what an electron is. Nor do they give any explanation for the basic property of electricity from an electrician's point of view - or any view for that matter. Most good electricians know the two basic tenets of electricity. One, electricity follows the shortest path to ground. Two, electricity follows the path of least resistance. These two priciples lead to some heavy philosophical deductions that contradict many long-established scientific understandings. To mention a few of these: FTL, virtual particles, dimensional offshoots, tangential timelines, and even hints at anti-gravity and potential energy gains through innovative circuit paths. Few electricians however, know that no one unique electron makes the journey from one end of a typical electrical path to the other, only the propagation wave does - that is measured as electrical potential and current.

Electricians are concerned with vast amounts of electrons in the arena of Avegadro's numbers - they're called "amperes" in the trade. No electrician can give you a description of a single electron because that is insignificant. So the basic element that runs our world remains a mystery of the highest order...but it works so who cares.(sarcastic paragraph for effect )

There is a problem in the North American electrical grids due to the use of the three-wire Edison circuit, which is the incorporation of a "nuetral" wire representing a phase declination of 45 degrees from either of the other two "hot" wires. In this tranmission scenario two voltages can be distributed to households and industry with a savings in the amount of wires needed. These days a four-wire Edison circuit is used in industry saving even more in copper and transmision costs.
The problem is in a thing called the "dirty neutral" where, for various reasons including undersized neutrals, improperly loaded neutrals, poorly grounded neutrals, sympathetic resonance between loads and many other exotic effects, the electrical system has an impedance incompatability causing loss of usable power on a significant scale. The worst part of this "impedance" issue is that it causes large magnetic fields in ordinary household circuits, especially if the work is carried out by a tradesman ignorant of the problem in the first place.

I know this may sound off topic but what redorbs is discussing is a possible explanation for some of the afore-mentioned real-world examples I encounter daily. Magnetics is the "bad side of the tracks" these days, but it was not always so. And a lot of that bad press is because of financial interests. Yup, good old vested interests, as usual. And there is real reason to think that magnetism may make a comeback in a big way. Maybe this is it.

I'm surprised that no one mentioned the deBroglie Wave Theory, if I remember his name correctly. It explained the orbit of an electron as an integer function of the length of the orbit. So the wave could have certain amplitudes but not others depending on the available orbits. Although, if I remember correctly, this had more to do with the spectrum of photon emission for which it was observered directly - it was borrowed by extrapolation to include an electron and other wave/particle dualities.


The topic of cosmic rays and gravity have me stumped, though. But then again, it's not my pet topic so I'll just yield the floor with a hail and a thanks to op and all responders, including Paul. hehe

[Dennis Leahy]

Should there be a break in this thread, with a new thread started with the gravitational discussion?

If I'm following along with the intent of this thread, it is (or at least, has evolved into) an exposition of Adam's findings that may be fertile ground for "free energy." Lots of physics constructs intermingle and it is true that Adam himself has delivered a wide smorgasbord of physics concepts that deserve attention... but if we follow every scattered breadcrumb, we are not really on a trail to anywhere.

Adam is the OP, and it's really his call if he wants to have a wide (far-flung?) thread where anything in a physics book is game, or if this thread has more merit by focusing on the narrower topic that is the tantalizing promise of information that leads to an understanding of where and how the energy in "free energy" can be tapped. (Thus the thread title: "the tapper.")

Wade Frazier may be correct in his overall assessment of the big picture of free energy, but if I got nothing more from this conversation than an understanding of the source of free energy so I could speak about it intelligently, I will have gotten something. As it is, if I mention free energy to friends, and say that the energy comes from "the space between atoms" which "is not empty but rather is full of energy" I get blank stares. I want to at least leave this conversation with an explanation of the source of free energy that I can repeat back to explain it to others. This conversation may go further - much further (I hope it does) but at the least, I want a foundational understanding of that one concept.

Dennis

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Dennis Leahy (here)
Should there be a break in this thread, with a new thread started with the gravitational discussion?

That was a bit of a detour (though a rather useful one for a couple of us) ... but if you look at the last day and last page of this thread, we're back to trying to find a way to develop this thread into a useful discussion of 7redorbs' topic.

[eaglespirit]

Hi Adam...Good Morning,

Furthering my prior pm's...
as a possibility of others watching to help move this forward.

Let it be known that Adam replied to me once with a very polite and positive message of probability of first-hand on-hand help.

As a very first basic step for mass open source exposure could you or would you put one form or a combined form of these few methods in the videos to work or your very own unique process to run a 5000 watt portable generator to power a 1200 to 1500 sq ft home within a month's working time?

If you could do this and we(my friends) could get you to the United States or Canada in a protected area as best we can come up with and take care of round trip expenses for you and the materials and labor involved including any needed help...would you consider it now?

If not, could you draw up practical working plans for this and send them on, being involved any way you choose?

...

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=653JgoBT1Uc

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=bMMFMz-ZUMg

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=yoCBORXzOqU

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=atlnVNy0IDE

[eaglespirit]

I know you sold them all, Adam...just bringing a 'refresher' overview here:

http://solomon-books.com/index.php?r...&product_id=53

Technology For a New Future European Edition NOW ON SALE! Mystery of Perpetual Power

Those seeking to buy the EUROPEAN edition of Technology For a New Future look no further! We are going to print!

Technology For a New Future is now available (15th November 2012) for purchase here by pre-order in Europe, including Poland, Latvia, Czech, Germany, France, Italy, Sweden!

Technology For a New Future the International Version will be available to purchase for pre-order as well from 20th November 2012! The time has come ladies and gentleman.


Technology For a New Future is now available for purchase here by pre-order for an estimated delivery date of 19th December 2012, 7 days after the 12.12.2012 release date of the book!. Limited stocks apply!!


Technology for a New Future is a 555 page full colour illustrated , self authored, and self published book by Adam Bull. Professionally printed on high quality paper in hardback, The chapters this book covers a new general theory of science, gravity, light and magnetism and new adjustments to current science and it's speed of light are furnished.

The above reading, The Magnetic Current, The Mineral, Vegetable and Animal Life and the advertisement they all go together - Edward Leedskalnin 5-20-44
Edward Leedskalnin, the Latvian genius who built Coral Castle wrote in his Miami Daily advertisement that his books and advertisements needed to gotogether, this book is the first book ever to put these consitutent parts of his work together and provide full explanations as to the operation of forces such as magnetism, gravity, light and the north and south pole individual magnets. This book including all of Edward Leedskalnin's original writings includes many facts, still unknown mathematically, scientifically, socially and philosophically to the world. As the Adinkra carefully encoded in their ancient African Symbols the technology of the ancients, the Sankofa, identical to the great works of George Hertzog and Edward Leedskalnin, Nikola Tesla, and befitting of King Solomon himself, explains that wisdom is going back to learn the secrets which are forgotten.

Chapter 1. The Academics, Foreword.

Chapter 2. Only fools laugh.
Chapter 3. Deception.
Chapter 4. Induction & Invention
Chapter 5. Every good Scientist
Chapter 6. Maxwell Equation Field Theory
Chapter 7. Return of the Djed
Chapter 8: In Society
Chapter 9: An Incorrect Theory
Chapter 10: Honest but Misunderstood
Chapter 11: Tesla & Leedskalnin
Chapter 12: Eric Dollard, R.C.A Employee & Recognized Authority Expert on Tesla
Chapter 13: Steinmetz & Electricity from the Square Root of -1
Chapter 14: Faster than light Blue Radiation
Chapter 15: Don't forget about R.C.A - it's integral for faster than light electricity
Chapter 16: Geometry of Propoating Waves
Chapter 17: The Violin
Chapter 18: The Economy
Chapter 19: The Ocean
Chapter 20: Dimension sof Tesla and Hertz Wave over Einstein's space/time
Chapter 21: Time
Chapter 22: Hippolyte PIxii
Chapter 23: The Atom
Chapter 24: The Earth
Chapter 25: Dewey B. - The Most Important lecture of your life
Chapter 26: Physics & CHemistry of the Solar System (J.S.Lewis)
Chapter 27: Non Relativistic Magnets
Chapter 28: "Power will Revolutionize the world", The World of Tomorrow, N.Tesla
Chapter 29: Misconception of Reality, an abstract on the broken science
Chapter 30: Patents & Copyright, Buying & Selling your Nature
Chapter 31: The Scientists & The Good Guys
Chapter 32: Overunity Volcanoes
Chapter 33: MSD and HPIMS
Chapter 34: Non Kirchoffian Circuits
Chapter 35: The Stars, Their Planets, The Plants & Their Animals
Chapter 36: Wheatstones Polar Clock
Chapter 37: Eric Dollard at SBARC & Transmission Path Schematics
Chapter 38: The Golden Ratio
Chapter 39: The Magnetic Building Blocks of Nature
Chapter 40: The Invention of the Electron
Chapter 41: Parametric Transformers (Jim Le Surf)
Chapter 42: Rant of the Electron
Chapter 43: Tesla's Vacuum Tube & Radio POwer to Revolutionize World
Chapter 44: Tesla's Cosmic Force
Chapter 45: Edward Leedskalnins Cosmic Force
Chapter 46: Diag Earth Current (art + science)
Chapter 47: Magnetic Base
Chapter 48: Sound Base
Chapter 49: Agnes Scuffs and Coral Castle I
Chapter 50: Long ago - Nikola Tesla, source dated 6 July 1930
Chapter 51: Pennsylvania Grand Masonic Lodge
Chapter 52: J. Reid, The Cymascope and Giza's Sound Base
Chapter 53: The Indiana Pi Bill, 1897
Chapter 54: Magnetic Current, New never before seen Analysis & decryption of "Coral Castle Ciphers".
Chapter 55: Emissivity & Permittivity
Chapter 56: Extracting Energy from Aether
Chapter 57: The Rock Gate Experiments
Chapter 58: Wireless Power
Chapter 59: Magnetic Field uses Sound Waves to Ignite Sun's Ring of Fire
Chapter 60: Magnets & Light
Chapter 61: A light in the Dark
Chapter 62: All planets have magnetic poles...except for equator planets, or neutral particle planets
Chapter 63: Voynich Manuscript deciphered and decoded. I + II + III + IV + V
Chapter 64: Light
Chapter 65: "Light" Rays
Chapter 66: Magnet Sun
Chapter 67: Vast repoistory of content
Chapter 68: Modern Electrical Systems
Chapter 69: Gravity
Chapter 70: A Shocking Discovery
Chapter 71: The Perpetual Atomic Force, Batteries & More
Chapter 72: --
Chapter 73: --
Chapter 74: Fall of Men
Chapter 75: Tesla's Last Known Living Assistants Recorded Statement (transcribed)
Chapter 76: The Dark Force
Chapter 77: Accusing Commonweal:
Chapter 78: Gravity, The Sun & Earth & Making the design of a Machine for it's replication.
Chapter 79: Repository
Chapter 80: Zinc Negative Resistance Oscillators
Chapter 81: Eric Dollard - Human Filth
Chapter 82: Nikola Tesla, Building a New Earth
Chapter 83: Trapped on Earth, Imprisoned on Planet Earth
Chapter 84: Repository
Chapter 85: Electrical Terms (A large Glossary of Proper dimensionality of Electricity Terms as Tesla and Dollard states them) Credit: E.P.D
Chapter 86: Electrical Glossary Credit: E.P.D
Chapter 87: Most Significant Patents of Ernst Alexanderson
Chapter 88: Alexanderson Generator, Perpetual Motion Holder and Niaudets Magneto Electrical Apparatus (Author has certificate of authenticity)
Chapter 89: Static Electricity means High Voltage (extract/appendix)
Chapter 90: --


Chapter 91: Sound Base
Chapter 92: Perpetual Motion is a Non Linear ohmic Transformer
Chapter 93: Universe of Motion, a Letter to David
Chapter 94: Closing.
Chapter 95: Appendix & Vast Repository of researches and News Clippings supporting what can only now be described as a "conspiracy theory" entrenched in the verifiable history of electrical theory, as well as in direct experimental non ohmic apparatus.


Chapter 96: Surprises.


Copyright expired Extra's included in this printed book:

Edward Leedskalnin. Magnetic Current
Edward Leedskalnin. Mineral, Vegetable, Plant, and Animal life
Edward Leedskalnin. Miami Daily Advertisement
Edward Leedskalnin. Coral Castle Advertisement pamphlet II

Happy anniversary to Edward Leedskalnin, this year marks his death being 60 years!

Solomon Books


Best Wishes,
Adam

http://www.conspiracy.co/forums/main...ual-power.html

[danda]

Can Adam or anyone else reading this help enlighten me on how one might go about measuring longitudinal waves? I am wondering... did Tesla use standard voltmeter/ammeter/oscilloscope, or something else? How about Eric Dollard, Marconi even....?

[AwakeInADream]

Being that the Earth is in constant motion around the Sun and the fact that it's spinning also, and that the Galaxy too is in motion, perhaps even the Universe.
That's an awful lot of movement, and perpetual motion. I know it's all relative (lol), but surely there must be a way to harness this energy. Like a cosmic wave windmill?

[eaglespirit]

Hi Adam or Anyone that may have done a bit of 'hands-on' work and research with this energy.
Is David explaining soundly some or all of the 'energy' Leedskalnin and Tesla harnessed in this video of his?

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=oUvLir6eO2M

David's explaining the energy of this:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=bMMFMz-ZUMg

[Hervé]

YEAH! Electro-magneto-plasmic universe!

Primer on plasma physics:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=9EPlyiW-xGI

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Amzer Zo (here)
Primer on plasma physics

Sweet !

Kimberley has started a thread on Dave LaPoint's Primer Fields video at: Dave LaPoint's Primer Fields (was: Bizarre Discovery at CERN... Plasma Energy changing the world!)

[Hervé]

Posted by Paul (here)

Posted by Amzer Zo (here)
Primer on plasma physics

Sweet !

Kimberley has started a thread on Dave LaPoint's Primer Fields video at: Dave LaPoint's Primer Fields (was: Bizarre Discovery at CERN... Plasma Energy changing the world!)

Actually, that's where I stole that video when witnessing the knee-jerk reactions of most posters to the word "CERN."

[eaglespirit]

Beautiful!!! : )