Their Mind and the Emotional Matrix that we create with it.

[Mark]

LOL Thanks Curtis and Calz, no Admin responsibilities here, thank goodness. I shall remain "dude-like" though.

Posted by TargeT (here)
I don't even think it should be called racism, it should be called "tribalism" or "diferentism"; it's a program (survival based?) that exists in every human & is perverted by archonic influence because, well it is a base program, a "known" constant & an easy "trigger", all it takes a is a lack of introspective analysis for this base program to be actuated, mix a touch of influence in and you have the various displays of "differentism" mostly a flavor of fear (un-comfort, hate, direct fear, dis-trust, what have you).

I can get with that, to the extent that people gravitate to people like them.

But racism is different. The xenophobia and animus that underlies it is systemic. It is an holistic system of control and exclusion that is very formulaic in manner. Very different from people seeing someone who doesn't look like them and being curious about the difference. There is not necessarily violence associated with difference in that instance. That is why in most indigenous cultures during the Ages of Discovery and Imperialism when the Europeans and their motley crews of colonized minds first arrived they were generally greeted in peace and with curiosity.

Racism goes hand-in-hand with capitalism. They augment each other. They both go hand in hand with formal religious creeds, Christianity in particular, which has been patently shaped to encompass the cultural traits that stem from the Archonic infiltration of Western Civilization during the Roman era. Amzer Zo's text regarding warfare and the total apprehension of most people against killing other people is relevant to the extent that there is a certain baseline resonance to societal strictures and, within all formal cultural constructs, non-violence is generally the norm, unless triggered emotionally or through certain systemic key structures.

For racism, googling the "Red Summer of 1919" or "postcards of lynchings" will bring up images of hundreds and thousands of people attending these events. They were ceremonial, they were symbolic, they were intimately Archonic. Today, we have the mass media, which does the same thing but in a much more pervasive manner. Bear witness to the "phenomenal" success of Tarantino's recent film, "Django Unchained". The sacrifices are societal and global now as the GWSS consolidates its hegemony. But all instances of violent expression remain indicative of energetic power sacrifices to the system of White Supremacy and Archonic control.

[TargeT]

Posted by Rahkyt (here)
It is an holistic system of control and exclusion that is very formulaic in manner. Very different from people seeing someone who doesn't look like them and being curious about the difference. There is not necessarily violence associated with difference in that instance. That is why in most indigenous cultures during the Ages of Discovery and Imperialism the Europeans and their motley crews of colonized minds first arrived they were generally greeted in peace and with curiosity.

What I speak of, “diferentism” does include typical “racist” type of feelings, this built in program is not just “curious” about others, it will favor “it’s own” over others (to include punishment) even when it normally wouldn’t (given a same – same situation vrs a same – different). There was almost an amount of Joy at puninishing "strangers" even when being generous to the strangers would equate to the subject getting "more" for themselfs.

This is all based on the study done with babies to find morality (60 min covered it, there are threads on it in this forum)
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...ns-of-morality




As for the topic at hand, I can’t see racism as anything but supportive of “their mind” mentality, a very good example.

Posted by Rahkyt (here)
For racism, googling the "Red Summer of 1919" or "postcards of lynchings" will bring up images of hundreds and thousands of people attending these events. They were ceremonial, they were symbolic, they were intimately Archonic. Today, we have the mass media, which does the same thing but in a much more pervasive manner. Bear witness to the "phenomenal" success of Tarantino's recent film, "Django Unchained". The sacrifices are societal and global now as the GWSS consolidates its hegemony. But all instances of violent expression remain indicative of energetic power sacrifices to the system of White Supremacy and Archonic control.

However:
I must be one of those who "thinks they are not racist" but really are a part of this GWSS you describe. Undoubtedly it could be said to exist, I can see this from observation (lots of white men running the major corporations / governments); I do not understand it however nor the concepts you are speaking of really.

I saw Django Unchanined, I saw it as sort of opening an old wound in an attempt to keep it fresh, it seemed (to me) to play a lot on a desired vindication; but not just by “black people”, I enjoyed the explosion of candy land as much as rest of the audience (majority of them were high melanin content) I thought it was a very interesting presentation of "anger targets" that were then torn down (the slaver collaborating slaves, the ex slave - slaver and of course the slavers themselves, and the various criminal element). That formula along with typical Tarantino style action sequences are what provide the popularity IMO.

But you see, I see all NACCP & other separatist type of actions as refocusing tools, something to keep focus on the differences between us so there is a continued issue.

But again, this is from the perspective of someone who doesn't know what you speak of with the GWSS or all the other racism you say exists; perhaps I am just naive.

[9eagle9]

Which is why slavery was not real capitalism, it was a very sorry circumstance that was capitalized on.

I have always observed that 'race' relations were intended to blur and hide something between us all. Obviously we are not all the same as racial correctness tried to ram down our throats. Why was it so important to their program that we had this perception that we were all the same?

The more honest way of putting it is perhaps I cannot relate to someone as 'Chinese' or Black or Russian, so perhaps we should try to relate on a level that we share.

Now we are going into that level and finding out perhaps we don't share even that.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

And racial tension was self created.

[Mark]

Posted by TargeT (here)
I must be one of those who "thinks they are not racist" but really are a part of this GWSS you describe. Undoubtedly it could be said to exist, I can see this from observation (lots of white men running the major corporations / governments); I do not understand it however nor the concepts you are speaking of really.

There are many, many studies that have documented the "system" of white supremacy, generally ranging from the 1950s onward, with the American Civil Rights movement and the world-wide Decolonization movements that resulted in the nominal "freedom" of many underdeveloped nations from overt colonial rule, research into sociological aspects of human interaction from the perspective of the oppressed became more common. With the quantitative revolution of the 1960s, the formalization of social science research reached a peak and then transformed into the qualitative research paradigm that accompanied the social shifts of the 1970s and 80s, called Postmodernism, which resulted in growing critiques of the scientific meta-narrative and the underlying assumptions therein.

It - institutional and personal racism as prejudice plus power - cannot be disassociated from anything else. But even within the overall context of Western Civilization, there are different modes through which it finds expression, some more overt, some less so.

For example, I lived in Germany for 4 years in the late 80s early 90s. I never experienced anything as close to what I lived in the United States once. The little, unconscious aspects of racism, the institutionalized aspect of it as the perception of the Other, which results in little things, such as people crossing the street when they see you coming, moving to the other side of elevators, moving purses to the other sides of their bodies, gathering their children when you come close, the looks, the eyes, the body language. Things of that sort that each person who engages in that behavior thinks is individual to themselves, but when you are on the other side and subjected to it daily, it becomes noticeable as a pattern, of people doing the same thing like robots, it becomes apparent as a systemic rejection of your body which is different in appearance from theirs, highlighting and focusing upon the Other-ness of your presence and the palpable fear and sometimes even overt hatred that accompanies it. It can build up over a long time in those so targeted, contributing to the overall stress and lower life-spans of those in that position within locales where such psychic trauma is endemic.

In Germany, there was not this same programming. Nobody ran for their kids when I entered a public park. Nobody moved their purse to the other side of their body. I actually walked by a gang of 10+ skinheads in Nuremberg with a blonde, green-eyed beauty on my arm and they didn't give me a passing glance. Now, if I was Turkish, perhaps it would have been different, as there is overt animus toward people of that background even back when I lived there. Canada is much the same in its lack of collective racial tension, I just spent 2 years there. There is not the same unconscious assumption of danger and fear that is found most in evidence in the United States, with its bloody and violent history.

None of the above, while being my personal experience, indicates a total lack of racism. The institutionalization of the sickness instead occurs at such a subliminal level that it is nigh unconscious. I remember one German girlfriend eating a box of candy with a little blackface pickaninny on it and looking at me in innocence while I explained to her that, in America, that would be offensive. An instance, perhaps, of unconscious correlation within the Archonic system, a constant release of energies on the part of the individual and the group that spikes whenever some emotive correlation is made and interactions occur between these unwitting participants and members of outside cultures.

In the context of the Foreign Installation, it speaks to the "sameness" of collectivity, of everybody looking the same, being the same, fitting into a preconceived mold like cogs in a machine. The collective nature of the Archonic invasion is mimicked at the material level by institutionalization and the attempt to fit people who "fit naturally together", who display that "sameness", be it of race, of social status, or whatever characteristic satisfies the underlying need to conform to the flyer's mind as it perverts natural human tendencies with its own structural impositions.

Posted by TargeT (here)
I saw Django Unchanined, I saw it as sort of opening an old wound in an attempt to keep it fresh, it seemed (to me) to play a lot on a desired vindication; but not just by “black people”, I enjoyed the explosion of candy land as much as rest of the audience (majority of them were high melanin content) I thought it was a very interesting presentation of "anger targets" that were then torn down (the slaver collaborating slaves, the ex slave - slaver and of course the slavers themselves, and the various criminal element). That formula along with typical Tarantino style action sequences are what provide the popularity IMO.

But you see, I see all NACCP & other separatist type of actions as refocusing tools, something to keep focus on the differences between us so there is a continued issue.

But again, this is from the perspective of someone who doesn't know what you speak of with the GWSS or all the other racism you say exists; perhaps I am just naive.

Regarding Django, I have not seen it yet but I spent 2 and a half hours the other night reading reviews about it, so I know the plot and its particulars pretty much inside and out by now. I think you're on point regarding the opening of the wound. Louis Farrakhan made an interesting statement about it. He pretty much said, the audiences who watched it did so from two different perspectives. The black audience saw it as redemptive, the white audience saw it as a warning. Farrakhan believes the movie was designed to continue to foment difference and could possible lend fuel to any potential racial flareups that might occur in the near-future.

From my interpretation of what I've read about the movie, I see Jamie Foxx's character as having psychopathic tendencies, the ability to kill without remorse. So, in this instance, he takes the capacity of those who have oppressed him and his people, in effect "fighting fire with fire" and then riding off into the sunset. From the site, mindcontrolblackassassins.com:

...Tarantino made it loud and clear to Negrodom early in the film that the storyline is about the Wagnerian Germanic Folktale of Broomhilda and Siegfried, a tale beloved by Adolf Hitler and Paul Josef Goebbels and the THRID REICH.

The article goes on to detail the links between black Hollywood elite and agendas that are conspiratorially familiar to all of us here and the nature of the historical relation between media and power relationships, as based upon the racial realities of our world.

In regards to you personally, I would not say that you are naive. From your position within the system, it is not necessary for your survival that you see the system at this particular level. You have no reason to, as you, by your biological origin, are not Other to the system. You are the fodder the system seeks to incorporate, to mine for your energetic resources. And so, you have not cultivated the "lens of perception" that Others must that is particularly honed to such things, as they can be the difference between life and death in extreme cases, between getting a job or not in other cases, between having a good day and having that day ruined by someone else's fear and projection in still others.

All energetic harvesting techniques that are now "automatic" within the system. But, for many within the system, like yourself, it is not easy to comply with these almost unconscious directives. This article perhaps gives a sense of the depth of the issue:

Friendliness to minorities often a performance—a fragile one, research suggests

Aug. 18, 2012
Special to World Science

Many white peo­ple be­have ex­tra nicely to mi­nor­i­ties, but it’s a per­for­mance that arises out of a sense of obliga­t­ion and that breaks down easily un­der stress, new re­search sug­gests.

The psy­chol­o­gists who over­saw the re­search say that many of us try to be­have a “cor­rect” way around mi­nor­i­ties, but that it might be more help­ful to de­vel­op a gen­u­ine com­fort with them by pur­su­ing life ex­pe­ri­ences that im­prove our out­look to­ward stig­mat­ized groups.

The work by Wendy Ber­ry Mendes and Ka­tri­na Koslov of the Uni­vers­ity of Cal­i­for­nia, San Fran­cis­co, sug­gests many white peo­ple act ex­tra friendly to­ward mi­nor­i­ties be­cause they feel pres­sure to over­cor­rect for their own prej­u­dices.

The scientists’ re­port, en­ti­tled “Brit­tle Smiles: Pos­i­tive Bi­ases To­ward Stig­ma­tized and Out­group Tar­gets,” is pub­lished in the Aug. 13 early on­line is­sue of the Jour­nal of Ex­pe­ri­men­tal Psy­chol­o­gy, Gen­er­al.

The re­search­ers an­a­lyzed the ac­tions of white peo­ple who were paired to­geth­er in var­i­ous interac­tions with oth­er whites, blacks, as well as peo­ple who had a large, realistic-looking, painted-on birth­mark. The par­ti­ci­pants weren’t told the real pur­poses of the stud­ies and were in­stead told they would be eval­u­at­ed for things such as “phys­i­o­log­ical re­sponses dur­ing lab­o­r­a­to­ry tasks.”

“In our daily lives, we of­ten have to cen­sor our pub­lic face by mon­i­tor­ing our be­hav­iors, ex­pres­sions, and words,” the re­search­ers wrote. As part of this, they added, there is a fre­quent ten­den­cy for peo­ple to “ex­ag­ger­ate their pos­i­tive be­hav­iors to­wards and pref­er­ences for stig­ma­tized and out­group mem­bers.”

But “these cor­rec­tion strate­gies, be­cause they are ef­fort­ful and re­quire re­sources, can be dis­rupted with stress or cog­ni­tive load.”

In one ex­pe­ri­ment, the re­search­ers found that whites paired with blacks in a lab­o­r­a­to­ry in­ter­ac­tion smiled more of­ten and used more pos­i­tive words than they did with other whites. In anoth­er ex­pe­ri­ment, white peo­ple who had scored more poorly on a test de­signed to re­veal un­con­scious ra­cial bi­ases ac­tu­ally eval­u­at­ed a group of fic­tion­al re­sumes more fa­vorably if they had stereo­typic­ally black names than if they had stereo­typic­ally white names. But this ten­den­cy broke down if this proj­ect was paired with anoth­er task de­signed to be stress­ful and dif­fi­cult.

Sev­er­al oth­er tests gave re­sults along si­m­i­lar lines.

“Over-cor­rec­tion… re­quires self-regulato­ry ef­fort and is based on the goal of ap­pear­ing un­prej­u­diced,” the re­search­ers wrote.

“Taken to­geth­er, these stud­ies ex­pose the some­times frag­ile na­ture of ex­plic­it race pref­er­ences, and that these cor­rec­tive pro­cesses may dis­ap­pear when [men­tal] re­sources are ex­haust­ed,” they added. “Pop­u­lar cul­ture is re­plete with ex­am­ples of fail­ures of self-con­trol lead­ing to ex­po­sures of ra­cial bias.”

“If over-cor­rec­tion is borne of a de­sire to ap­pear un­prej­u­diced, then it may be a weak strat­e­gy for achiev­ing that goal, only use­ful when an in­di­vid­ual has suf­fi­cient self-regulato­ry re­sources,” they sug­gested. “Pur­su­ing life ex­pe­ri­ences that could re­lieve anx­i­e­ty around mi­nor­ity group mem­bers or change un­der­ly­ing at­ti­tudes to­wards them is likely to be a more re­sil­ient and per­ma­nent way to achieve a goal of egal­i­tar­ian be­hav­ior.”

For those who are of the OP persuasion, the above would not be an issue. But for those within the system who are ensouled, it is an issue. It is an act that is difficult to carry off consistently, as it goes against their inherent tendency to see people as people, not as colors, or, necessarily as Other. But, to see others as people like you, you - as a collective member of the GWSS target population - are going against your own social programming, which puts you at loggerheads with family, friends and society. Individuals who want to smile at others not like them, knowing that society says that they are different, are lesser, creates mental and emotional tension which causes them to over-emphasize friendliness, which foments energetic siphoning by the collective Foreign Installation. As you noted, racism serves the GWSS but even moreso, it serves the Archonic system of energy-feeding. It creates a pervasive field of energy in countries, states and individuals, perhaps releasing certain flavors of energy that are on their gourmet menu. Yum.

[Curt]

Posted by Rahkyt (here)

It also seems that it is easier for the Flyers to occupy a person who is an OP than it is for them to occupy a person who is a nominal OP but who also has the capacity to fully manifest the psychic gifts of the ensouled.

I recognize the milieu and the difficulties in categorization especially in light of the consideration that the flyer's mind reinforces these differentiation for its own gain. That gain is personally favorable, in that the white or black person that complies with the hierarchical directives of racism "succeeds" within the system. The flyer's mind gains, the individual gains. For those who like to think of themselves as not being complicit in institutionalized racism, a short examination of personal trajectory through social space during a lifetime can reveal successes based more upon compliance and inclusion within the systemic parameters than any personal traits.

By rejecting racism, personal prejudice, and working to remove all benefits gained from living and working within the system of such, we gain freedom. By making choices that conform to higher directives we banish the flyer's mind. This must be true for either souled or nonsouled. The difficulty in doing so for both groups is perhaps different, but the end result is freedom.

What you've mentioned here (together with what you've written elsewhere about Organic Portals) reminds me of the film, Fallen (1998). I watched it the other day after you had mentioned it, I believe, in another thread.

In the film, select people were able to resist/avoid being occupied by the archontic entity/demon simply based on who they were. They were vulnerable to attack in other ways, and could be taken over under certain conditions, but they could not be taken over so easily as the general population.

But, in the film, the vast majority of people could be totally possessed/occupied (like organic portals) quite easily. These folks were the ones whom, in the Matrix, would have been taken over by Agent Smith with zero resistance.

In both films, some essential integrity seemed to be the difference between being possessed and not being possessed.

To put it into the context of the conversation in this thread: is the sole source of this integrity the soul?

Or is having a soul merely a necessary pre-condition for achieving integrity by then taking the intentional action(s) of casting off the flyer’s mind/their mind?

In a very abstract way, my question is another version of the question, Is it by Good Works, or Through Faith Alone that one achieves salvation.

Is it enough to simply be blessed with a soul, or does one have to be blessed and then (only if they're lucky enough to have been blessed) do the work to escape Their Mind?

[Chester]

Posted by CurtisW (here)

Posted by Rahkyt (here)

It also seems that it is easier for the Flyers to occupy a person who is an OP than it is for them to occupy a person who is a nominal OP but who also has the capacity to fully manifest the psychic gifts of the ensouled.

I recognize the milieu and the difficulties in categorization especially in light of the consideration that the flyer's mind reinforces these differentiation for its own gain. That gain is personally favorable, in that the white or black person that complies with the hierarchical directives of racism "succeeds" within the system. The flyer's mind gains, the individual gains. For those who like to think of themselves as not being complicit in institutionalized racism, a short examination of personal trajectory through social space during a lifetime can reveal successes based more upon compliance and inclusion within the systemic parameters than any personal traits.

By rejecting racism, personal prejudice, and working to remove all benefits gained from living and working within the system of such, we gain freedom. By making choices that conform to higher directives we banish the flyer's mind. This must be true for either souled or nonsouled. The difficulty in doing so for both groups is perhaps different, but the end result is freedom.

What you've mentioned here (together with what you've written elsewhere about Organic Portals) reminds me of the film, Fallen (1998). I watched it the other day after you had mentioned it, I believe, in another thread.

In the film, select people were able to resist/avoid being occupied by the archontic entity/demon simply based on who they were. They were vulnerable to attack in other ways, and could be taken over under certain conditions, but they could not be taken over so easily as the general population.

But, in the film, the vast majority of people could be totally possessed/occupied (like organic portals) quite easily. These folks were the ones whom, in the Matrix, would have been taken over by Agent Smith with zero resistance.

In both films, some essential integrity seemed to be the difference between being possessed and not being possessed.

To put it into the context of the conversation in this thread: is the sole source of this integrity the soul?

Or is having a soul merely a necessary pre-condition for achieving integrity by then taking the intentional action(s) of casting off the flyer’s mind/their mind?

In a very abstract way, my question is another version of the question, Is it by Good Works, or Through Faith Alone that one achieves salvation.

Is it enough to simply be blessed with a soul, or does one have to be blessed and then (only if they're lucky enough to have been blessed) do the work to escape their mind?

I can only speak for myself. I achieved this required level of integrity through a process called trial and error and through intense desire.

I see no "soul" (a concept only) as playing any role unless you equate "soul" with what I call "one's inner essence."

That inner essence is the essence that is encompassed by the energy of love which, to me is God's most important energy and is infinite.

I believe this energy is freely available to all and is accessible by anyone if they earnestly seek it be they labeled by others as psychopaths, sociopaths or any other path, even this specific "blabberpath"... justoneman.

Be ready to forgive yourself along the way as sometimes you discover after the fact that your actions along the have "hurt" others.

You have to decide which is more important... achieving the necessary self transformation where your will aligns harmoniously with the Will of God or anything else.

Nothing else has been more important to me.

[Chester]

Here's a secret - the only difference between the Matrix and the Kingdom of God is that within the Matrix, there is a lack of love which as a result, has been filled with evil.

When one calls forth the energy of love, evil vanishes as there's no room for it anymore.

Everything else remains exactly the same yet is completely different.

[TargeT]

Posted by Rahkyt (here)
The black audience saw it as redemptive, the white audience saw it as a warning. Farrakhan believes the movie was designed to continue to foment difference and could possible lend fuel to any potential racial flareups that might occur in the near-future.

I can see the "redemptive" take, (due to social programming)... but a "warning"?

This to me is more of the "crap" that is keeping us divided, how was this movie a warning? who was it a warning too? is slavery (other than that forced on us by the government) still practiced here that I don't know about it? if so then it's a warning to them.. Farrakhan is speaking from a point of view that clearly states he thinks a lot in an "us vs them" mentality.

I just don't see it that way at all, & think that analysis is a part of the problem.

Posted by Rahkyt (here)
In regards to you personally, I would not say that you are naive. From your position within the system, it is not necessary for your survival that you see the system at this particular level. You have no reason to, as you, by your biological origin, are not Other to the system. You are the fodder the system seeks to incorporate, to mine for your energetic resources. And so, you have not cultivated the "lens of perception" that Others must that is particularly honed to such things, as they can be the difference between life and death in extreme cases, between getting a job or not in other cases, between having a good day and having that day ruined by someone else's fear and projection in still others.

Well in a lot of respects I will soon have exposure to (as close as I can get as a white male, I imagine) the "other side of the coin" I will be a member of a small minority in the Virgin islands (black 76.2% white 13.1% Asian 1.1% other 6.1% mixed 3.5% http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demogra...Virgin_Islands) so maybe this will help with my understanding a bit.

I will honestly say that I think (and this is very likely due to a lot of what you describe & my lack of experience) the point of view you are presenting is exaggerated, true, but not as bad as some people would lead me to believe.. (thus the naive comment I made). And while I am hesitant to say that I see in that hesitation a bit of what you describe. For example I do not say the word "n****r" ever, being overly sensitive to everything that surrounds that word and it's use (something I also have been trying to break myself of; at least the almost fear-based avoidance (though I'd call it more of an attempt to be courteous, but it is fear based I think) of that term/word). So clearly there is some inherent sensitivity to "race relations" that I've never really explored (it just doesn't come up, being military perhaps has dulled it a bit, as we accept everyone evenly (or so it seems to me).

Complex topic, not one I've explored much.

Posted by Rahkyt (here)
All energetic harvesting techniques that are now "automatic" within the system. But, for many within the system, like yourself, it is not easy to comply with these almost unconscious directives. This article perhaps gives a sense of the depth of the issue:

Friendliness to minorities often a performance—a fragile one, research suggests

Aug. 18, 2012
Special to World Science

Many white peo­ple be­have ex­tra nicely to mi­nor­i­ties, but it’s a per­for­mance that arises out of a sense of obliga­t­ion and that breaks down easily un­der stress, new re­search sug­gests.

The psy­chol­o­gists who over­saw the re­search say that many of us try to be­have a “cor­rect” way around mi­nor­i­ties, but that it might be more help­ful to de­vel­op a gen­u­ine com­fort with them by pur­su­ing life ex­pe­ri­ences that im­prove our out­look to­ward stig­mat­ized groups.

The work by Wendy Ber­ry Mendes and Ka­tri­na Koslov of the Uni­vers­ity of Cal­i­for­nia, San Fran­cis­co, sug­gests many white peo­ple act ex­tra friendly to­ward mi­nor­i­ties be­cause they feel pres­sure to over­cor­rect for their own prej­u­dices.

The scientists’ re­port, en­ti­tled “Brit­tle Smiles: Pos­i­tive Bi­ases To­ward Stig­ma­tized and Out­group Tar­gets,” is pub­lished in the Aug. 13 early on­line is­sue of the Jour­nal of Ex­pe­ri­men­tal Psy­chol­o­gy, Gen­er­al.

The re­search­ers an­a­lyzed the ac­tions of white peo­ple who were paired to­geth­er in var­i­ous interac­tions with oth­er whites, blacks, as well as peo­ple who had a large, realistic-looking, painted-on birth­mark. The par­ti­ci­pants weren’t told the real pur­poses of the stud­ies and were in­stead told they would be eval­u­at­ed for things such as “phys­i­o­log­ical re­sponses dur­ing lab­o­r­a­to­ry tasks.”

“In our daily lives, we of­ten have to cen­sor our pub­lic face by mon­i­tor­ing our be­hav­iors, ex­pres­sions, and words,” the re­search­ers wrote. As part of this, they added, there is a fre­quent ten­den­cy for peo­ple to “ex­ag­ger­ate their pos­i­tive be­hav­iors to­wards and pref­er­ences for stig­ma­tized and out­group mem­bers.”

But “these cor­rec­tion strate­gies, be­cause they are ef­fort­ful and re­quire re­sources, can be dis­rupted with stress or cog­ni­tive load.”

In one ex­pe­ri­ment, the re­search­ers found that whites paired with blacks in a lab­o­r­a­to­ry in­ter­ac­tion smiled more of­ten and used more pos­i­tive words than they did with other whites. In anoth­er ex­pe­ri­ment, white peo­ple who had scored more poorly on a test de­signed to re­veal un­con­scious ra­cial bi­ases ac­tu­ally eval­u­at­ed a group of fic­tion­al re­sumes more fa­vorably if they had stereo­typic­ally black names than if they had stereo­typic­ally white names. But this ten­den­cy broke down if this proj­ect was paired with anoth­er task de­signed to be stress­ful and dif­fi­cult.

Sev­er­al oth­er tests gave re­sults along si­m­i­lar lines.

“Over-cor­rec­tion… re­quires self-regulato­ry ef­fort and is based on the goal of ap­pear­ing un­prej­u­diced,” the re­search­ers wrote.

“Taken to­geth­er, these stud­ies ex­pose the some­times frag­ile na­ture of ex­plic­it race pref­er­ences, and that these cor­rec­tive pro­cesses may dis­ap­pear when [men­tal] re­sources are ex­haust­ed,” they added. “Pop­u­lar cul­ture is re­plete with ex­am­ples of fail­ures of self-con­trol lead­ing to ex­po­sures of ra­cial bias.”

“If over-cor­rec­tion is borne of a de­sire to ap­pear un­prej­u­diced, then it may be a weak strat­e­gy for achiev­ing that goal, only use­ful when an in­di­vid­ual has suf­fi­cient self-regulato­ry re­sources,” they sug­gested. “Pur­su­ing life ex­pe­ri­ences that could re­lieve anx­i­e­ty around mi­nor­ity group mem­bers or change un­der­ly­ing at­ti­tudes to­wards them is likely to be a more re­sil­ient and per­ma­nent way to achieve a goal of egal­i­tar­ian be­hav­ior.”

I can see that as being very viable (over correction, however NOT as a cover for prejudice, simply because the topic has been made so sensitive that overcorrection seems the only approach), I do not see it(latent prejudice) in myself nor anyone I associate with (again, primarily military or those involved with the military.. we treat racial stereotypes as easy jokes & they go both directions equally from my perspective, I've never seen hate or discontent related to race in this professional setting, though I did see it in highschool & just thought it as sad / odd) act in any prejudice way, even in highly stressful situations... I've been a lot of places and worked with a lot of people (of varring races) and I just do not see true prejudice with a few rare exceptions, I DO see over-acting over-correction and I think it is exactly due to the emphasis on "race relations" or "racial tension" that is force fed to us all the time.

I was in the very beginning of the "Tea Party" movement, I attended rallies, I set up political groups, I went to weekly meetings for years... I N E V E R saw race as an issue E V E R.. it was purely political polarization and yet I saw constantly in media that the "tea party" being against big federal government some how had something to do with the current figure head's race.

This example is how I equate almost all racism that I hear about, I just do not see it. (I understand my limitations and that I am very likely missing a lot from my perspective) unless I listen to mainstream media or people who have built a career on it (Farrakhan for example).

Posted by Rahkyt (here)
For those who are of the OP persuasion, the above would not be an issue. But for those within the system who are ensouled, it is an issue. It is an act that is difficult to carry off consistently, as it goes against their inherent tendency to see people as people, not as colors, or, necessarily as Other. But, to see others as people like you, you - as a collective member of the GWSS target population - are going against your own social programming, which puts you at loggerheads with family, friends and society. Individuals who want to smile at others not like them, knowing that society says that they are different, are lesser, creates mental and emotional tension which causes them to over-emphasize friendliness, which foments energetic siphoning by the collective Foreign Installation. As you noted, racism serves the GWSS but even moreso, it serves the Archonic system of energy-feeding. It creates a pervasive field of energy in countries, states and individuals, perhaps releasing certain flavors of energy that are on their gourmet menu. Yum.

again, I do not see what you are saying, I have seen (in myself and what I assume is going on in others) smiles that are forced due to over sensitivity and some sense that it's required. but NOT to cover hatred or prejudice, just simply due to social pressures.

I don't know if this was directed at me or just "people like me" or what, but I don't know what social programming you speak of, the only social programming I have seen is that other races expect me to be prejudice so I have to some how go out of my way to show that it's not true & apparently from what you are saying this is seen as covering up for being prejudice.

[9eagle9]

If a case of evidence can be made for walk ins, I don't see why a soul-less body couldn't be inhabited by a soul.

Maybe as this becomes a bit more well known and we can keep 'their' mind out of it more about the phenom of walks-in will convey something of that nature.

Posted by AwakeInADream (here)
If only we could see the soul with some sort of technology...

I wonder if it's even possible that a soul might leave a body at one stage ('give up the ghost'), whilst the body itself carries on living mechanically?
Sleep walking through life...Or inversely, maybe a soul-less body can suddenly become inhabited by a soul?

[AwakeInADream]

I'm out of my depth intellectually here, but....

Isn't this over-emphasized friendliness just a kind of guilt? Perhaps an unnecessary guilt brought on by the 'felt' need to apologize on behalf the race one identifies with?

Is guilt perhaps one of the most harmful and sneaky emotions there is?

Maybe guilt about an emotion leads to repression causing explosion, aiding the leakage and collection of the loosh by outside entities? As Rahkyt said, Yum!

[TargeT]

Posted by AwakeInADream (here)
I'm out of my depth intellectually here, but....

Isn't this over-emphasized friendliness just a kind of guilt? Perhaps an unnecessary guilt brought on by the 'felt' need to apologize on behalf the race one identifies with?

Is guilt perhaps one of the most harmful and sneaky emotions there is?

Maybe guilt about an emotion leads to repression causing explosion, aiding the leakage and collection of the loosh by outside entities? As Rahkyt said, Yum!

Yes, that's good expansion on it.. and this guilt that (at least by me) seems based on nothing I nor anyone I know did or do, can lead to feelings of resentment, another nasty emotion. I'm sure this is just another example of the gambit of energetic production we seem encouraged to do mixed with continued confusion to keep us from seeing the source / reason of / for it.


& don't worry about intellectual depth, I feel exactly the same way ; especially on these new topics (if that helps any).

[9eagle9]

Real love yes. Not the fake flower child new age love and light let's wave a feather duster at it and it will go away love.

I do agree the Matrix highlights if not out right states what real love is all about.

Real love has enormous courage, enormous resource, it can create circumstances that help one to dodge bullets. It shows people fighting for strangers and other humans who they will never even meet to have an opportunity to love in more superficial ways.
Call it 'de-tached' love but its still pretty fierce. You notice in the Matrix people aren't sitting around discussing their 'feelings' and having group therapy lessons, and whining that someone doesn't show them 'love'.

Posted by justoneman (here)
Here's a secret - the only difference between the Matrix and the Kingdom of God is that within the Matrix, there is a lack of love which as a result, has been filled with evil.

When one calls forth the energy of love, evil vanishes as there's no room for it anymore.

Everything else remains exactly the same yet is completely different.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Yes is a core collective wound that human's share. It also relates to religious programming or rather religious programming wired itself in to it. I think the wound that caused it may have started back in our ancient lost history, like around the time of Atlantis.

There's a sort of clear guilt one has when they no they are wrong or know they caused something that will prompt someone to make amends.

Then there's that deep rooted shadowy guilt that you are speaking of that causes people to react in the way that you just described.

Posted by AwakeInADream (here)
I'm out of my depth intellectually here, but....

Isn't this over-emphasized friendliness just a kind of guilt? Perhaps an unnecessary guilt brought on by the 'felt' need to apologize on behalf the race one identifies with?

Is guilt perhaps one of the most harmful and sneaky emotions there is?

Maybe guilt about an emotion leads to repression causing explosion, aiding the leakage and collection of the loosh by outside entities? As Rahkyt said, Yum!

[9eagle9]

Well thank you god, that the two of you feel over your head intellectually rather than being in a emotionally reactive state about it.

That's GOOD NEWS!

Emotional reactiveness to talking about this sort of thing is a sure sign the 'their' mind is at work, attacking so you (or anyone else) don't look at it or yourself very hard. It has to have a SAFE environment to work. It can't do its job when in it's in a panic.

Intellectually yes its a lot to wrap one's head around . I only know marginally more than anyone else here in this thread. I'm just jotting down observations.

When I go into Vivek's thread I feel the same way, over my head because my own intellect is not real good with silocon base protea nodules that insinate themselves into the core radia of the nucleiotidic genome" (lol) but I still go there because...its all part of the same thing. That is why we need all kinds of people able to understand this in the physical and non physical level.

The bolded part I made up but that's what it looks like to me when I try to read the chemical parts of this mess.

Posted by TargeT (here)

Posted by AwakeInADream (here)
I'm out of my depth intellectually here, but....

Isn't this over-emphasized friendliness just a kind of guilt? Perhaps an unnecessary guilt brought on by the 'felt' need to apologize on behalf the race one identifies with?

Is guilt perhaps one of the most harmful and sneaky emotions there is?

Maybe guilt about an emotion leads to repression causing explosion, aiding the leakage and collection of the loosh by outside entities? As Rahkyt said, Yum!

Yes, that's good expansion on it.. and this guilt that (at least by me) seems based on nothing I nor anyone I know did or do, can lead to feelings of resentment, another nasty emotion. I'm sure this is just another example of the gambit of energetic production we seem encouraged to do mixed with continued confusion to keep us from seeing the source / reason of / for it.


& don't worry about intellectual depth, I feel exactly the same way ; especially on these new topics (if that helps any).

[Gekko]

Posted by AwakeInADream (here)
I'm out of my depth intellectually here, but....

Isn't this over-emphasized friendliness just a kind of guilt? Perhaps an unnecessary guilt brought on by the 'felt' need to apologize on behalf the race one identifies with?

Is guilt perhaps one of the most harmful and sneaky emotions there is?

Maybe guilt about an emotion leads to repression causing explosion, aiding the leakage and collection of the loosh by outside entities? As Rahkyt said, Yum!

I think perhaps you are speaking of shame, rather than guilt, at least in my conception of the words. Guilt says, "What I did was bad or unacceptable." Shame says, "I am bad or unacceptable."

[9eagle9]

That's perfect.

Posted by Gekko (here)

Posted by AwakeInADream (here)
I'm out of my depth intellectually here, but....

Isn't this over-emphasized friendliness just a kind of guilt? Perhaps an unnecessary guilt brought on by the 'felt' need to apologize on behalf the race one identifies with?

Is guilt perhaps one of the most harmful and sneaky emotions there is?

Maybe guilt about an emotion leads to repression causing explosion, aiding the leakage and collection of the loosh by outside entities? As Rahkyt said, Yum!

I think perhaps you are speaking of shame, rather than guilt, at least in my conception of the words. Guilt says, "What I did was bad or unacceptable." Shame says, "I am bad or unacceptable."

[another bob]

Posted by 9eagle9 (here)
That's perfect.

Posted by Gekko (here)

Posted by AwakeInADream (here)
I'm out of my depth intellectually here, but....

Isn't this over-emphasized friendliness just a kind of guilt? Perhaps an unnecessary guilt brought on by the 'felt' need to apologize on behalf the race one identifies with?

Is guilt perhaps one of the most harmful and sneaky emotions there is?

Maybe guilt about an emotion leads to repression causing explosion, aiding the leakage and collection of the loosh by outside entities? As Rahkyt said, Yum!

I think perhaps you are speaking of shame, rather than guilt, at least in my conception of the words. Guilt says, "What I did was bad or unacceptable." Shame says, "I am bad or unacceptable."

It's funny how early that gets started too. Today our 14 mo. old grand daughter Ryder was playing with our Lab Amos, and at one point smacked him in the face. We said, "Poor Amos!" and Ryder, who felt implicated by the tribe, and in a fit of self-conscious shame and embarassment, burst out in tears and flung her head into her mom's chest.

[AwakeInADream]

Yes! Guilt can be positive, for without it how could we learn! So yes, shame may be the right word. (lol at my choice of smiley)

Shame doesn't have any 'up-sides', does it?

Shame try's to convince you that 'you'll never change'.

[another bob]

Posted by AwakeInADream (here)
Yes! Guilt can be positive, for without it how could we learn! So yes, shame may be the right word. (lol at my choice of smiley)

Shame doesn't have any 'up-sides', does it?

Shame try's to convince you that 'you'll never change'.

Shame says you're not worthy -- it's the flip side of pride.

[PurpleLama]

I'm just plain ol' bad, unshamefully so.

My perspective, to my self, shows guilt and shame being equally useless.

Guilt isn't the same as conscience.

[another bob]

What's interesting is that both shame and (arrogant) pride are associated with a physical act of chest-beating. One is in the form of "mea culpa", and the other in the form of "I am the king of the world!". If anything, the act of pointing to one's chest represents a form of direct self-confirmation, asserting the reality of "my" existence, "my" self-image.