New Alien Evidence? 2013 UFO OVNI

[TheGoat]

Wow this is interesting, does anyone know where they got this from? If this is genuine we're talking here about a decent public autopsy by specialists in the fields!

Also that Sirius trailer looks fascinating, can't wait to see the full thing.

[Tangri]

Posted by OnyxKnight (here)

Posted by GalaxyHorse (here)
The 'Being', or 'Creature' that is humanoid, 6" is not going to get you much Cranial mass, in other words if it
is a sentient Humanoid, how much brain power could we realistically expect such a tiny entity to possess Very strange, whatever he/she/them is for sure....

Brain size has nothing to do with intelligence or sentience.

Why did you say that. I thought all the years elephants were the brightest one.

[OnyxKnight]

Posted by Tangri (here)
Why did you say that. I thought all the years elephants were the brightest one.

All I'm saying is the size of the brain, or whatever analogue of a nervous system a life form has, is not directly linked to how intelligent, sentient or sapient they are.

A life form may have a larger cranium then humans, but be no more intelligent than a dung beetle. Likewise, nothing says that a life form as big as the one we talk about here, that tiny humanoid, can't be intelligent or sapient with the brain size it has.

I hope I'm understood this time.

[KiwiElf]

Einstein claimed he was only using 10% of his brain capacity - yikes, what does that say for the rest of us?

[Tangri]

Posted by OnyxKnight (here)

Posted by Tangri (here)
Why did you say that. I thought all the years elephants were the brightest one.

All I'm saying is the size of the brain, or whatever analogue of a nervous system a life form has, is not directly linked to how intelligent, sentient or sapient they are.

A life form may have a larger cranium then humans, but be no more intelligent than a dung beetle. Likewise, nothing says that a life form as big as the one we talk about here, that tiny humanoid, can't be intelligent or sapient with the brain size it has.

I hope I'm understood this time.

I was just backing up you without left broke hearth-ed your correspondence.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)
~it DOES matter for the Site-Admin, he/she can merge the other with mine (not the other way around) because that happened to me 3 times last 2 years when I was 2nd

Posted by OnyxKnight (here)
Okay, Mods, a plea to merge the other thread with this one then :D.

Which order we merge two threads in (Merging A into B, or vice versa) ends up making no difference to the order of posts on the resulting thread. Posts on a thread are always displayed in order of their timestamp (when they were posted.)

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)
I only explain common knowledge concerning forum rules

It's not "common knowledge" with me (to worry about which thread was posted first) .

I do however usually think briefly about whether the resulting merged thread, with potentially intermingled posts from both threads, based on timestamp order, will make sense. Merging two tightly woven interactive discussions happening in overlapping time periods can be a bad idea, in which cases I will sometimes leave the two threads separate, and cross post on each a link to the other thread for the interested reader.

[KiwiElf]

David Wilcock has added a recent new post on his site. Apparently,.. almost identical ET corpses found in Russia and South America.

http://divinecosmos.com/start-here/d...-south-america

[Flash]

Posted by OnyxKnight (here)

Posted by Tangri (here)
Why did you say that. I thought all the years elephants were the brightest one.

All I'm saying is the size of the brain, or whatever analogue of a nervous system a life form has, is not directly linked to how intelligent, sentient or sapient they are.

A life form may have a larger cranium then humans, but be no more intelligent than a dung beetle. Likewise, nothing says that a life form as big as the one we talk about here, that tiny humanoid, can't be intelligent or sapient with the brain size it has.

I hope I'm understood this time.

Right in some ways, intelligence always depends on what the brains content is in fact (neurons or not, well organised or not, etc). On earth, it is often considered by scientists that what counts is the proportion of the brain size to the rest of the body. It is the ratio brain size to body that counts to infer greater or lesser intelligence (small dog brain for its body size for exampel, same for your cat).

If we look at it that way, the Neenderthal men was more intelligent than us.

So, it that 6 inch bipede has a brain ratio to its body larger than ours, it would be considered more intelligent with today's science.

[Nanoo Nanoo]

Posted by GalaxyHorse (here)
The 'Being', or 'Creature' that is humanoid, 6" is not going to get you much Cranial mass, in other words if it
is a sentient Humanoid, how much brain power could we realistically expect such a tiny entity to possess Very strange, whatever he/she/them is for sure....

I guess if you were looking at it from a humanoid stance , the size of the brain may be a limitation but we should postulate that advanced beings have advanced mental capacities in smaller spaces. Just like a Calculator in the 50's was the size of a car , now days it can fit on the head of a pin. So times this by a billion and perhaps thats where its at.

N

[Corncrake]

Thanks for the Divinecosmos link - I stopped following David Wilcock some time ago and missed this. Absolutely fascinating stuff about all the other ET corpses. I really hope the documentary makes an impact but having seen so many simpering journalists making ambivalent remarks on the subject of UFO's and ET's that unless a popular figurehead with a bit of gravitas like David Attenborough (in the UK at least!) for example speaks out I think it will just slide into obscurity like the original Disclosure Project conference. I find it incredible how people still try to debunk all those top ranking highly credible witnesses.