Did A UFO Intervene Destroying Russian Meteor?

[WhiteFeather]

Did a UFO intervene by destroying the meteor in russia before it hit our planet? I Found this On Gio's Ranch Thread. You be the judge.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Tk3h6ni-nZY

[phillipbbg]

Yes an Unidentified Flying Object (UFO) did pass through it at very high speed.... now who Fired the object ? Or does it matter? it happened and seems to have been a defensive action that prevented a lot of harm

[WhiteFeather]

The UFO.....Was it ours, or from the stars. Good question. Maybe we will never know the answer.

[kaon]

It sure looks like something was fired into it. However, I would like to see other videos of the event. This can't be the only one in existence.

[Bill Ryan]

-------

Confession: When I first saw this video posted (on another thread), I thought: "Nonsense. No way could the Russians shoot down a small object traveling at 33,000 mph."

But I watched the video -- and now I'm not nearly so sure. It really looks as if something solid and non-explosive struck the object cleanly from one side (coming from the left), and continued out of the frame to the right.

The video is pretty clear for what it is. It looked like what one would expect from a kinetic energy weapon. That's a very fast, large bullet, to you and me.

Here's the concept, which was always part of the Star Wars program (and the Russians have their equivalent, too):
http://dkosopedia.com/wiki/Brilliant_Pebbles

If the Russians really do have the technology to do this, the Americans should be worried. It would mean they can take down any satellite, missile or advanced aircraft they want to, at any time they choose.

The other outlandish explanation (more outlandish? Maybe not!) is that ETs intervened. I can't think of any other way to explain the video other than the above two suggestions.

Edit to add -- see my post #27 over the page. I've changed my mind.

[Prodigal Son]

It looks to me like whatever was fired at the meteor came from the ground.... but who knows for sure. If the Russians have the technology to do this they're not going to admit to it, and if a ufo did it they're certainly not admitting to that either.. at least not yet.....

Whatever the case, it is CRYSTAL CLEAR that SOMETHING hit that meteor and broke it up to reduce the damage it would create on impact.... as Bill said, non-explosive but it did the job.

[AuCo]

Did not do well in my science classes but anyway my thought:
- for an object at high speed to enter earth atmosphere it has to puncture at a more vertical angle than what the trajectory path appears in the video.
- if it was meant to shoot at a meteor it did a rather poor job.
However,...

[KiwiElf]

According to some sources, America, Russia & China have advanced technology to varying degrees, capable of doing this (ie their own secret space programs, aka STAR TREK technology).

Allegedly, a couple of TR-3B's were "loaned" to Israel last year.

[WhiteFeather]

Posted by AuCo (here)
Did not do well in my science classes but anyway my thought:
- for an object at high speed to enter earth atmosphere it has to puncture at a more vertical angle than what the trajectory path appears in the video.
- if it was meant to shoot at a meteor it did a rather poor job.
However,...

If an advanced race intervened here, im sure them terminating the meteor would be like shooting fish in a barrel.

[Hervé]

It sure was a fast travelling "object":

Posted by Amzer Zo (here)

Posted by Referee (here)
Looks like something went through the metorite..Perhaps shoot at by something... Good video evidence IMO...

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=3ZzG881Vii8

Referee, thank you for digging that video up because, if original and unaltered, it means that the object that zapped across the meteor unscathed was travelling at about twice as fast as the meteor itself. That is, at about 80,000 mph!

NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., now say the meteor weighed about 10,000 tons and was travelling 40,000 mph (64,373 km/h) when it exploded.

UFO anyone?

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by AuCo (here)
Did not do well in my science classes but anyway my thought:
- for an object at high speed to enter earth atmosphere it has to puncture at a more vertical angle than what the trajectory path appears in the video.

Actually, that's not the case. An object like an asteroid (God help us!) or meteor -- the difference between the two is just a matter of size -- can enter the Earth's atmosphere at pretty much any angle at all.

If it enters at a shallow angle, it hits a lot of atmosphere along the way (on its trajectory towards the ground) and is therefore more likely to burn up before it gets there. On the other hand, a large object coming in vertically would just piledrive its way straight through the atmosphere and impact the ground big time.

[WhiteFeather]

Daniel of Doria's YT Video. Watch at the 1:22 mark. There is another viewable object in the still.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=80wZ6TchNCk

[Borden]

This is one of those instances when I really do think that places like this are the unwitting sheepdog to the socio-engineered mind. When so many subjects are rendered ludicrous, is it any wonder that the sorts of subjects we discuss here are considered the talk of flakes?

A place like Avalon should have some integrity and intelligence. If we play into their hands by buying into the most absurd 'conspiracies' then we poison everything for anything of merit we may discuss. We become laughable.

I'm not an expert in meteorites, but it looks as though that 'event' was a part of the dynamic of a very fast moving and super-heated object.

This depresses me but doesn't surprise me.

[Prodigal Son]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by AuCo (here)
Did not do well in my science classes but anyway my thought:
- for an object at high speed to enter earth atmosphere it has to puncture at a more vertical angle than what the trajectory path appears in the video.

Actually, that's not the case. An object like an asteroid (God help us!) or meteor can enter the Earth's atmosphere at pretty much any angle at all.

But if it enters at a shallow angle, it hits a lot of atmosphere along the way (on its trajectory towards the ground) and is therefore more likely to burn up before it gets there. But a large object coming in vertically would just piledrive its way straight through the atmosphere and hit the ground big time.

I dunno Bill.. I thought the space shuttle came in at a shallow angle to reduce heat.... because if it came straight down it would get incinerated. Whatever the case, I'm not so sure I want to know the answer

Maybe this thing was a lot bigger that the 50ft diameter the MSM is telling us... or maybe it wasn't a meteor at all. Or maybe, it was the cabal throwing something at us. Didn't all the biggest bankers take off and go into hiding? They're probably in their bunkers pissed off to all hell that this thing didn't do what they intended. If that's the case, we know there's been a lot of ET intervention with nukes, so why not with this also.

[Tesseract]

I found this comment (user Doom2pro)on youtube regarding this video:

'By the way, watch the original video and it becomes really obvious what you are seeing, it's the gunge on the windshield causing optical distortion and reflections similar to a lens flair.
There is no object hitting the meteor, the meteor is passing by some crap on the windshield which is between the meteor and the camera.'

I haven't looked into it myself, but I think it is due diligence to do so before making any conclusions here.

[ScubaMonkey]

Yeah, I'm pretty sure it was Superman!

[bennycog]

Posted by Borden (here)
This is one of those instances when I really do think that places like this are the unwitting sheepdog to the socio-engineered mind. When so many subjects are rendered ludicrous, is it any wonder that the sorts of subjects we discuss here are considered the talk of flakes?

A place like Avalon should have some integrity and intelligence. If we play into their hands by buying into the most absurd 'conspiracies' then we poison everything for anything of merit we may discuss. We become laughable.

I'm not an expert in meteorites, but it looks as though that 'event' was a part of the dynamic of a very fast moving and super-heated object.

This depresses me but doesn't surprise me.

By very fast super heated object do you mean the meteor or the "missile". One of the first reports coming out was saying that it was shot at by the Russian military. So I think the issue does need to be discussed because of the type of weapon that would need to be used, is very advanced.

[KiwiElf]

I recommend GoodeTXSG's post here:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...ystems-Related

Speculation it may be, but it makes the most sense IMO. Cheers

[DeDukshyn]

Posted by Tesseract (here)
I found this comment (user Doom2pro)on youtube regarding this video:

'By the way, watch the original video and it becomes really obvious what you are seeing, it's the gunge on the windshield causing optical distortion and reflections similar to a lens flair.
There is no object hitting the meteor, the meteor is passing by some crap on the windshield which is between the meteor and the camera.'

I haven't looked into it myself, but I think it is due diligence to do so before making any conclusions here.

Let's consider this.

First I'll dismiss the optical flare idea because grunge on a windshield can't cause that - only light sources can. I think what was meant was perhaps them apparent luminance of this piece of "grunge" - so let's assume that - this might be possible and valid.

It appears that even though the camera is tracking the object left to right - the piece of grunge is also moving left to right faster than the object. If I was tracking something left to right, any stationary object in my view would go right to left.

That said, I can also see this video has its own camera tracking (it's own zoomed track separate from the footage) and I cannot see the camera track of the camera because there is not enough in the scene, so the windshield grunge theory still may have some weight ... one would have to look at the original video, and determine if the tracking there accounts for windshield grunge.

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Prodigal Son (here)

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by AuCo (here)
Did not do well in my science classes but anyway my thought:
- for an object at high speed to enter earth atmosphere it has to puncture at a more vertical angle than what the trajectory path appears in the video.

Actually, that's not the case. An object like an asteroid (God help us!) or meteor can enter the Earth's atmosphere at pretty much any angle at all.

But if it enters at a shallow angle, it hits a lot of atmosphere along the way (on its trajectory towards the ground) and is therefore more likely to burn up before it gets there. But a large object coming in vertically would just piledrive its way straight through the atmosphere and hit the ground big time.

I dunno Bill.. I thought the space shuttle came in at a shallow angle to reduce heat.... because if it came straight down it would get incinerated.

If a large rocky object came straight down (the Space Shuttle isn't the best example, because it would break up), it would certainly be heated up to a very high temperature very quickly -- but not for long, as it would hit the ground within seconds, and there would probably be enough left of it for the core to remain intact. (Remember that the atmosphere is only about 60 miles thick.)

On a longer 'burn' (such as a shallow angle in which the object would travel through the atmosphere for hundreds or even thousands of miles), the prolonged heat would be likely to completely destroy the object unless it was quite large.

Meanwhile, the Shuttle would come in at a very shallow angle, presenting its heat-tiled underbelly at an exactly calculated angle to the atmosphere, and while it also got extremely hot it would use the air resistance to brake its speed. The angle of entry was critical: too steep and it would burn up, too shallow and it would "bounce off", like a stone skipping across a pond.