The Technological Revolution: Artificial Intelligence and the Invisible Plague

[SilentFeathers]

Posted by RMorgan (here)

Posted by SilentFeathers (here)
Just my thoughts...

I think the scuttlers are like webcrawlers in the average computer, but much more advanced of course. They are the "hardware" that collects data in your brain/mind when you are being scanned, or are having this technology pass through you so to speak. I believe these critters are so small that you "can't" literally see them in their physical form. But, when being scanned by them they are so deeply embedded in the conscious and unconscious mind that there are moments that they seem to appear....perhaps they are deeply entrenched in the optic lobe also when collecting data in a persons mind. It's likely a glitch through the optic lobe of the minds eye that cause people to see them IMO.

Let me explain this another way, it's like when you scan a document.....you put the document in your scanner and scan it and it appears on your computer screen. What you are actually seeing is an image of the document on your screen, not the physical document in your scanner.

I personally think these scuttlers operate in the same way some how.....people that see them are actually getting a glimpse of the inner guts of the supercomputer IMO. When this "outrageous" and "invasive" technology connects to a person the connection is not just a one way street so to speak....as the supercomputer connects to the mind, the mind connects to the supercomputer, they can see us and read us and somehow there is a glitch IMO that sometimes allows the mind to "notice" the connection/source and for a split second the mind is actually seeing the invasive "hardware" probing them....the scuttler somehow senses the breach and disengages, thus appearing for a split second "outside" of the mind and fades away quickly as the connection is severed.

That's what I think

Man, this could be the case indeed. It´s a very plausible possibility, I mean, the possibility of them triggering a visual manifestation produced by the brain, not necessarily real to the outside world.

...perhaps they are deeply entrenched in the optic lobe also when collecting data in a persons mind.

You know, it reminds me of this research, where a German neurologist claims to have found the area of the brain where evil lurks in killers and rapists.

One of Germany’s best-known brain specialists, Bremen scientist Dr. Gerhard Roth says the ‘evil patch’ lies in the brain’s central lobe and shows up as a dark mass on X-rays.

'We showed these people short films and measured their brain waves,' he said.
'Whenever there were brutal and squalid scenes the subjects showed no emotions.
In the areas of the brain where we create compassion and sorrow, nothing happened.'
The dark mass at the front of the brain, he says, appears in all scans of people with records for criminal violence.

source

Raf.

It's interesting how the word "evil" comes in to the scientific arena of this technology.....as it is a religious term/phenomena.

But personally I see this technology as very sinister and EVIL too, demonic like in many ways. In a religious sense it is the devil himself behind the joystick of this "Invasive game".

Sadly, if this technology was in the right hands and being used for good it could probably correct many biological.genetic defects etc....it could probably greatly increase the health of all creatures and even help the Earth herself.....but no, the EVIL powers that be would rather use it to invade and enslave us.

[RUSirius]

[/QUOTE]
.....but no, the EVIL powers that be would rather use it to invade and enslave us.[/QUOTE]

Yup, its total bull sh!+, its pretty pathetic ultimately, but they dont know that, probably, anyway it stinks. Just felt like echoing the complaint.

See how I messed up the quote...sorry bout that.

[Fred Steeves]

Posted by SilentFeathers (here)
I personally think these scuttlers operate in the same way some how.....people that see them are actually getting a glimpse of the inner guts of the supercomputer IMO. When this "outrageous" and "invasive" technology connects to a person the connection is not just a one way street so to speak....as the supercomputer connects to the mind, the mind connects to the supercomputer, they can see us and read us and somehow there is a glitch IMO that sometimes allows the mind to "notice" the connection/source and for a split second the mind is actually seeing the invasive "hardware" probing them....the scuttler somehow senses the breach and disengages, thus appearing for a split second "outside" of the mind and fades away quickly as the connection is severed.

That's quite an interesting way to look at it SF, and who knows, it may be. Let me toss this back into the equasion for digestion. A couple weeks ago I saw what's referred to here as a "scuttler",(great name!) as on many other occassions, but this time the very moment after it disappeared into a wall, one of those little pinpoints of light appeared briefly, almost right next to me. I somewhat often see either one or the other, but never both at the same time. Hmmm, almost seems like two opposing forces in play. Thoughts?

One more thing. Several years ago, before I had a clue about this kind of stuff, an elderly neighbor of mine happened to mention that she had been seeing whispy, shadow like "spirits" around recently. Are we certain this is all technology? Or could the technology be mimicking a natural phenomena? Just tossing thoughts about.

[RUSirius]

Posted by Fred Steeves (here)

Posted by SilentFeathers (here)
I personally think these scuttlers operate in the same way some how.....people that see them are actually getting a glimpse of the inner guts of the supercomputer IMO. When this "outrageous" and "invasive" technology connects to a person the connection is not just a one way street so to speak....as the supercomputer connects to the mind, the mind connects to the supercomputer, they can see us and read us and somehow there is a glitch IMO that sometimes allows the mind to "notice" the connection/source and for a split second the mind is actually seeing the invasive "hardware" probing them....the scuttler somehow senses the breach and disengages, thus appearing for a split second "outside" of the mind and fades away quickly as the connection is severed.

one of those little pinpoints of light appeared briefly, almost right next to me. I somewhat often see either one or the other, but never both at the same time. Hmmm, almost seems like two opposing forces in play. Thoughts?

I see these pinpoints of light daily, FWIW.

[SilentFeathers]

Posted by Fred Steeves (here)

Posted by SilentFeathers (here)
I personally think these scuttlers operate in the same way some how.....people that see them are actually getting a glimpse of the inner guts of the supercomputer IMO. When this "outrageous" and "invasive" technology connects to a person the connection is not just a one way street so to speak....as the supercomputer connects to the mind, the mind connects to the supercomputer, they can see us and read us and somehow there is a glitch IMO that sometimes allows the mind to "notice" the connection/source and for a split second the mind is actually seeing the invasive "hardware" probing them....the scuttler somehow senses the breach and disengages, thus appearing for a split second "outside" of the mind and fades away quickly as the connection is severed.

That's quite an interesting way to look at it SF, and who knows, it may be. Let me toss this back into the equasion for digestion. A couple weeks ago I saw what's referred to here as a "scuttler",(great name!) as on many other occassions, but this time the very moment after it disappeared into a wall, one of those little pinpoints of light appeared briefly, almost right next to me. I somewhat often see either one or the other, but never both at the same time. Hmmm, almost seems like two opposing forces in play. Thoughts?

One more thing. Several years ago, before I had a clue about this kind of stuff, an elderly neighbor of mine happened to mention that she had been seeing whispy, shadow like "spirits" around recently. Are we certain this is all technology? Or could the technology be mimicking a natural phenomena? Just tossing thoughts about.

I seriously think this technology is rather in it's infancy (on a grand scale that is). I believe it just recently went on line on a grand scale so to speak.

I'm sure they are watching forums, websites etc and are now seeing that these scuttlers are being noticed by quite a few people. I'm also quite sure that they would intend to fix this glitch as I think they would rather prefer complete secrecy instead of dealing with an uproar from the people about "invasion of privacy" on the deepest levels known to man.

The point of light you may be seeing could be new code they are writing so to speak that is possibly being created to fix this glitch that is occasionally exposing the hardware. (just a guess on my behalf).

Scuttlers are very different than "spirits or demons" IMO. I believe in both....

This is where the line is being crossed by psychopaths....I believe the spiritual realm also operates on the so called electromagnetic/cosmic grid somehow, that it is in our dimension, our universe. The spirit world is a layer of our physical world, they can not be separated IMO. (we are both, in both, exist in both at the same time somehow, someway). This technology could be in a way violating the universal laws and could backfire with severe consequences (like many other things we humans are doing, including violating natural laws here on Earth).

If we here are truly on to this and this technology is real (which I believe it is), we could possibly see some very strange things soon as the spirit world and the physical world synthetically/un-naturally are brought together, blended together more in to one space and or time spot. This could really warp things worse that they already are IMO.

I think we are already seeing symptoms of this VIOLATION happening.....but it's going to get much weirder.

[4evrneo]

Posted by SilentFeathers (here)

Posted by Vivek (here)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=U7UroLFYlzE

Quite the wild video!

Makes me wish I had stayed in college studying computer science.
Fascinating stuff !

[4evrneo]

I was hesitant to mention that I think I may have seen my first "scuttler" also. This past sunday nite, as I turned my light off in my room I saw something that could very well have been spider looking above my bed near my fan. It was dark in my room but I also didnt have my contact lenses in but I would say it was about as big as the palm of my hand or a little smaller. I saw it for about 2 or 3 seconds and then it looked as if it just went up disappearing into the ceiling.

Another thing I would add is that its been almost 2 weeks of not keeping cell phone, computers etc. on at night near my bed and it does seem as though I have been noticing other "things" floating or hovering around when I turn off the lights. I guess Im wondering if this might have anything to do with more visual awareness without the electromagnetic pollution from the cell phones and wifi.

ps. Love all the video's and posts here, still absorbing and catching up

[sheme]

Does anyone experiencing the various phenomena described ever object, Or do you just stay quiet and observe? You must object- they violate your space /free will.

Personally I have seen/ experienced nothing at all.

[Fred Steeves]

Posted by 4evrneo (here)
I was hesitant to mention that I think I may have seen my first "scuttler" also. This past sunday nite, as I turned my light off in my room I saw something that could very well have been spider looking above my bed near my fan. It was dark in my room but I also didnt have my contact lenses in but I would say it was about as big as the palm of my hand or a little smaller. I saw it for about 2 or 3 seconds and then it looked as if it just went up disappearing into the ceiling.

Spider like huh? That's interesting. The ones I see are bigger, roughly half the size of a person, but formless. Like a dark condensed fog. I'm curious why the difference...

[RMorgan]

Posted by sheme (here)
Does anyone experiencing the various phenomena described ever object, Or do you just stay quiet and observe? You must object- they violate your space /free will.

Hey Sheme,

Does it even matter? If rats, cockroaches, ants or even conventional spiders decide for some reason to invade your home, would they really care if you object against their entry?

In such cases, the best you could do is to call the DDT man, however, what can you do if you´re dealing with beings that don´t even officially exist and can render themselves invisible as they please?

Maybe we can find a solution, but first we need to understand the mechanics of such technology. For now, there´s no solution.

So yes, my friend, I just observe. That´s the best I can do right now.

Cheers,

Raf.

[sheme]

Link to post 470

Then your passivity may be construed as acceptance/consent, If I was to walk into your home would you just observe?

[Jeffrey]

Cross-posting!

Excerpts from -- Gnostic Parallels in the Writings of Carlos Castaneda -- by John Lash.

-------------------------

They warned that the Archons invade the human psyche, they intrude mentally and psychologically, although they may also confront us physically as well. Their main impact, however, is in our mental syntax, in our paradigms and beliefs, exactly as don Juan says of the flyers.

Don Juan tells Castaneda that the predator’s mind is “a cheap model: economy strength, one size fits all.” This description fits the hive-mentality of the Archons. Sorcerers call this uniform alien mind “the foreign installation, which exists in you and in every other human being.” The foreign installation (italicized by Castaneda) pulls us out of our syntax. It deranges our indigenous abilities to organize the world according to the language proper to our species. The role of correct syntax in the sorcerer’s mastery of intent is one of the central factors in the later teachings of Don Juan. The sorcerer's concern for deviation of syntax, and consequent derouting of intent, parallels the importance of language and correct definition emphasized in Gnostic teaching.

Don Juan makes a number of statements pertinent to strategies against alien intrusion. He says that the sorcerers of ancient times “found out that if they taxed the flyers’ mind with inner silence, the foreign installation would flee, giving to any one of the practitioners involved in this maneuver the total certainty of the mind’s foreign origin.” In other words, the realization that another mind can operate in our minds only becomes fully clear and certain when the foreign mind has been exposed and expelled. Only then do we understand how “the real mind that belongs to us, the sum total of our experience, after a lifetime of domination has been rendered shy, insecure and shifty.” The “real mind” of Castaneda can be equated to the nous authenticos of the Gnostics. The main effect of the flyers upon our mind is seen in mental conditioning, brainwashing. This is also the main effect of Archontic intrusion.

Source: http://www.metahistory.org/gnostique...a/CCgnosis.php

-------------------------

Excerpts from an interview with Credo Mutwa on alien abduction and reptilians.

-------------------------

These so-called gods, who were like human beings, but very tall, with a long tail, and with terrible burning eyes, some of them had two eyes-yellow, bright eyes-some had three eyes, the red, round eye being in the center of their forehead. These creatures then took away the great powers that human beings had: the power of speaking through the mind only, the power of moving objects with their mind only, the power of seeing into the future and into their past, and the power to travel, spiritually, to different worlds.

All of these great powers the Chitauli took away from human beings and they gave human beings a new power, now, the power of speech. But, human beings found, to their horror, that the power of speech divided human beings, instead of uniting them, because the Chitauli cunningly created different languages, and they caused a great quarrel between people.

[...]

Before the coming of the Chitauli, before the coming of the Imbulu creatures, human beings were spiritually one. But when the Chitauli came, human beings became divided, both spiritually as well as by language.

Source: http://www.metatech.org/credo_mutwa.html

-------------------------

Excerpts from -- The Electronic Revolution -- by William Burroughs.

-------------------------

In the beginning was the word and the word was god and has remained one of the mysteries ever since. The word was God and the word was flesh we are told. In the beginning of what exactly was this beginning word? In the beginning of WRITTEN history.

[...]

It is doubtful if the spoke word would have ever evolved beyond the animal stage without the written word. The written word ist inferential in HUMAN speech. It would not occur to our wise old rat to assemble the young rats and pass his knowledge along in an aural tradition BECAUSE THE WHOLE CONCEPT OF TIME BINDING COULD NOT OCCUR WITHOUT THE WRITTEN WORD. The written word is of course a symbol for something and in the case of hieroglyphic language writing like Egyptian it may be a symbol for itself that is a picture of what it represents. This is not true of an alphabet language like English. The word leg has no pictorial resemblance to a leg. It refers to the SPOKEN word leg. so we may forget that a written word IS AN IMAGE and that written words are images in sequence that is to say MOVING PICTURES. So any hieroglyphic sequence gives us an immediate working defini- tion for spoken words. Spoken words are verbal units that refer to this pictorial sequence. And what then is the written word? My basis theory is that the written word was literally a virus that made spoken word possible. The word has not been recognized as a virus because it has achieved a state of stable symbiosis with the host.

[...]

I quote from MECHANISMS OF VIRUS INFECTION edited by Mr. Wilson Smith, a scientist who really thinks about his subject instead of merely correlating data. He thinks, that is, about the ultimate intentions of the virus organism. In an article entitled VIRUS ADAPTIBILITY AND HOST RESISTANCE by G. Belyavin, speculations as to the biologic goal of the virus species are enlarged ... ‘Viruses are obligatory cellular parasites and are thus wholly dependant upon the integrity of the cellular systems they parasitize for their survival in an active state. It is something of a paradox that many viruses ultimately destroy the cells in which they are living...”

And I may add the environment necessary for any cellular structure they could parasitize to survive. Is the virus then simply a time bomb left on this planet to be activated by remote control? An extermination program in fact? In its path from full virulence to its ultimate goal of symbiosis will any human creature survive? Is the white race, which would seem to be more under virus control than the black yellow and brown races, giving any indication of workable symbiosis?

‘Taking the virus eye view, the ideal situation would appear to be one in which the virus replicates in cells without in any way disturbing their normal metabolism.’

[...]

‘It is worth noting that if a virus were to attain a state of wholly benign equilib- rium with its host cell it is unlikely that its presence would be readily detected OR THAT IT WOULD NECESSARILY BE RECOGNIZED AS A VIRUS. I suggest that the word is just such a virus. Doktor Kurt Unruh von Steinplatz has put forth an interesting theory as to the origins and history of this word virus. He postulates that the word was a virus of what he calls BIOLOGIC MUTATION effecting the biologic change in its host which was then genetically conveyed.

[...]

In the Electronic Revolution, I advance the theory that a virus IS a very small unit of word and image. I have suggested now such units can be biologically activated to act as communicable virus strains.

[...]

Is a virus perhaps simply very small units of sound and image? Remember the only image a virus has is the image and sound track it can impose on you.

[...]

“A virus is characterised and limited by obligate cellular parasitism. All viruses must parasite living cells for their replication. For all viruses the infection cycle comprises entry into the host, intracellular replication, and escape from the body of the host to initiate a new cycle in a fresh host.” I am quoting here from MECHANISMS OF VIRUS INFECTION edited by Dr. Wilson Smith. In its wild state the virus has not proved to be a very adaptable organism. Some viruses have burned themselves have burned out since they were 100 per cent fatal and there were no reservoirs. Each strain of virus is rigidly programed for certain attack on certain tissues. If the attack fails, the virus does not gain a new host.

[...]

Ron Hubbard, founder of Scientology, says that certain words and word com- binations can produces serious illnesses and mental disturbances. I can claim some skill in the scrivener’s trade, but I cannot guarantee to write a passage that will make someone physically ill. If Mr. Hubbard’s claim is justified, this is certainly a matter for further research, and we can easily find out experimentally whether his claim is justified or not. Mr. Hubbard bases the power he attributes to words on his theory of engrams. An engram is defined as word, sound, [or] image recorded by the subject in a period of pain and unconsciousness.

[...]

I have frequently spoken of word and image as viruses or as acting as viruses, and this is not an allegorical comparison. It will be seen that the falsifications of syl- labic western languages are in point of fact actual virus mechanisms. The IS of identity the purpose of a virus is to SURVIVE. To survive at any expense to the host invaded. To be an animal, to be a body. To be an animal body that the virus can invade. To be animals, to be bodies. To be more animal bodies, so that the virus can move from one body to another. To stay present as an animal body, to stay absent as antibody or resistance to the body invasion.

The categorical THE is also a virus mechanism, locking you in THE virus universe. EITHER/OR is another virus formula. It is always you OR the virus. EITHER/OR. This is in point of fact the conflict formula which is seen to be archetypical virus mechanism.

Source: http://mindingthegaps.pbworks.com/f/...Revolution.pdf

-------------------------

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=uSPsTvPdyQg

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=DU8dPPy0_bM

See also:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ticket_That_Exploded

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programming_language

http://www.romanpoet.org/223/vml02.pdf

[RMorgan]

Posted by sheme (here)
Then your passivity may be construed as acceptance/consent, If I was to walk into your home would you just observe?

No, I would invite you for a coffee, my friend.

If there was a bad guy trying to sneak into my home, I could tell him to leave before I call the police.

However, in this case, we´re dealing with technology, plain and simple. Talking to these things is just as pointless as trying to convince a computer virus to go away from your computer by talking with it.

These things will just do whatever they are programmed to do. They couldn´t care less if you allow or disallow their presence. They are not programmed to care, in fact.

Their are just weird kinds of robots, probably with no autonomy whatsoever to make their own decisions.

Raf.

[sheme]

https://youtube.com/watch?v=Ytjthz7naZ0

Tea for me please- Thank you for your hospitality. Sorry but it is hard to drink tea with those spiders morphing around. LOL Peace and love to you friend.

[RMorgan]

Posted by Vivek (here)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=uSPsTvPdyQg

Man, this video matched perfectly with the article I linked on post #460, saying that there´s an ‘evil patch’ on violent people´s central lobe that shows up as a dark mass on X Ray.

It also matches this other video, which is about how these beings travel through TV and radio transmitters:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=cLD1s33H28Y

We are really into something here, Vivek. This thread is simply fascinating.

Raf.

[sheme]

Distorted voices also ring 'bad stuff' if you have some thing to say that you believe is true then don't be ashamed say it with your own voice.

[Flash]

Posted by RMorgan (here)

Posted by sheme (here)
Then your passivity may be construed as acceptance/consent, If I was to walk into your home would you just observe?

No, I would invite you for a coffee, my friend.

If there was a bad guy trying to sneak into my home, I could tell him to leave before I call the police.

However, in this case, we´re dealing with technology, plain and simple. Talking to these things is just as pointless as trying to convince a computer virus to go away from your computer by talking with it.

These things will just do whatever they are programmed to do. They couldn´t care less if you allow or disallow their presence. They are not programmed to care, in fact.

Their are just weird kinds of robots, probably with no autonomy whatsoever to make their own decisions.

Raf.

I was reading your description as a standalone, without looking at the thread topic. It seemed to me that you were describing psychopaths, the one actually succeeding in leading us (this will change, because we can, the non psychopaths, auto program ourselve to go around the psychos, if we wish).

[Fred Steeves]

I have a question, and I do apologize if this is off topic. Just tell me if it is. I don't doubt the technical angle of this phenomena, but like I was wondering before, why is it being assumed that it is JUST technology based?

Funny that Vivec just posted about Don Juan speaking of this, because one question would be how long these things have been being observed? If people of antiquity saw them, then how does that square with this being a recently technological based occurence?

And the follow up to that. Suppose this new technology is working in tandem with interdimensional energies, like dimension hopping cloning, for lack of a better expression. Is it real? Or is it Memorex? Maybe they won't have to go through so much trouble with invoking these entities through ritual, if super computers can mimic them.

[RMorgan]

Posted by Fred Steeves (here)
I have a question, and I do apologize if this is off topic. Just tell me if it is. I don't doubt the technical angle of this phenomena, but like I was wondering before, why is it being assumed that it is JUST technology based?

Funny that Vivec just posted about Don Juan speaking of this, because one question would be how long these things have been being observed? If people of antiquity saw them, then how does that square with this being a recently technological based occurence?

And the follow up to that. Suppose this new technology is working in tandem with interdimensional energies, like dimension hopping cloning, for lack of a better expression. Is it real? Or is it Memorex? Maybe they won't have to go through so much trouble with invoking these entities through ritual, if super computers can mimic them.

Hey Fred,

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."

I know you´re a fan of Arthur C. Clarke, right?

So yes, this technology might be here for a long time, as part of a shadow biosphere or even introduced by alien races, and who knows, maybe the freaks in power mastered or altered this tech and are using it now for their own purposes.

So, it might be something very old, something very new, or a combination of both.

Raf.

[sheme]

You vibrate, you live you create, you attract what you vibrate. You imagine, you create. The creation of the individuals vibration creates -exists- it has form -it awaits each individual. Master your imagination, and you master your vibration. Tell the children this law.