3/11/11: Was Japan Hit by a "Tsunami Bomb" or a "Prompt Global Strike"?

[Tesla_WTC_Solution]

For nearly three years now I have posited that I do not believe that the great Japan earthquake of 2011 was entirely natural. For the conspiracy theorists on here, I want to present two alternative views to the common belief that Japan suffered a "natural disaster" and not a created one.

~TWTCS

__________________________________________________________________

The Tsunami Bomb (courtesy of NN and PP websites)

http://www.prisonplanet.com/planned-...al-cities.html

Planned secret tidal wave bomb aimed to destroy coastal cities

J. D. Heyes
Natural News
March 1, 2013

The U.S. and New Zealand conducted secret tests of what is being described as a “tsunami bomb,” which experts said was aimed at devastating coastal cities by using a series of underwater explosions that would result in massive tidal waves.

The tests, which were initially carried out around the waters of New Caledonia and Auckland during World War II, “showed that the weapon was feasible,” Britain’s Telegraph newspaper reported recently.

The paper said a series of 10 large offshore blasts were enough to potentially create a 3-foot tsunami that would be capable of swallowing a small city along a coastline.

Prompt Global Strike
PGS

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prompt_Global_Strike

Prompt Global Strike (PGS) is a United States military effort to develop a system that can deliver a precision conventional weapon strike anywhere in the world within one hour,[1][2] in a similar manner to a nuclear ICBM. In April 2010, Marine Corps General James Cartwright explained the system's rationale, stating that "Today, unless you want to go nuclear, [the conventional military response time is] measured in days, maybe weeks".[3] A PGS system could also be useful during a nuclear conflict, potentially replacing nuclear weapons against 30 percent of targets.[4]

The PGS system will be designed to complement existing American rapid-response forces, such as Forward Deployed Forces, Air Expeditionary Groups (which can deploy within 48 hours) and carrier battle groups (which can respond within 96 hours).[5] Possible delivery systems include:

~a rocket similar to existing ICBMs, launched from land or via submarine
~an air-launched hypersonic cruise missile, such as the Boeing X-51 or Advanced Hypersonic Weapon
~a kinetic weapon launched from an orbiting space platform (rods from god)

In 2010, the United States Air Force prototyped a PGS system based on a modified Minuteman III ICBM.[3] In March 2011, Air Force Major General David Scott stated that the service had no plans to use a sea- or land-based ICBM system for Prompt Global Strike, as they would be expensive to develop and potentially "dangerous." Instead, efforts would focus on a hypersonic glider.[6] However, the following day, Air Force Chief of Staff Norton Schwartz said that an ICBM-based PGS system was still an option.[7]

__________________________________________________________________

"As early as World War Two, Allied scientists knew that deadly tsunamis could be created by the controlled serial detonation of powerful explosives and/or kinetic weapons."

__________________________________________________________________

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_bombardment

Kinetic bombardment
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Kinetic strike" redirects here. For the political euphemism, see kinetic military action.

For the generic concept of attacking a planetary surface from orbit, see Orbital bombardment.

A kinetic bombardment is the act of attacking a planetary surface with an inert projectile, where the destructive force comes from the kinetic energy of the projectile impacting at very high velocities. The concept is encountered in science fiction and is thought to have originated during the Cold War.

Non-orbital bombardments with kinetic projectiles, such as lobbing stones with siege engines such as catapults or trebuchets are considered siege warfare, not kinetic bombardment.

____________________________________________________

Projekt Thor

Project Thor

Project Thor is an idea for a weapons system that launches kinetic projectiles from Earth orbit to damage targets on the ground. Jerry Pournelle originated the concept while working in operations research at Boeing in the 1950s before becoming a science-fiction writer.[1][2]

The most described system is "an orbiting tungsten telephone pole with small fins and a computer in the back for guidance". The weapon can be down-scaled, an orbiting "crowbar" rather than a pole.[citation needed] The system described in the 2003 United States Air Force (USAF) report was that of 20-foot-long (6.1 m), 1-foot-diameter (0.30 m) tungsten rods, that are satellite controlled, and have global strike capability, with impact speeds of Mach 10.[3][4][5]

The time between deorbiting and impact would only be a few minutes, and depending on the orbits and positions in the orbits, the system would have a world-wide range.[citation needed] There is no requirement to deploy missiles, aircraft or other vehicles. Although the SALT II (1979) prohibited the deployment of orbital weapons of mass destruction, it did not prohibit the deployment of conventional weapons. The system is prohibited by neither the Outer Space Treaty nor the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty.[4][6]

The idea is that the weapon would inflict damage because it moves at orbital velocities, at least 9 kilometers per second. Smaller weapons can deliver measured amounts of energy as small as a 225 kg conventional bomb.[citation needed] Some systems are quoted as having the yield of a small tactical nuclear bomb.[5] These designs are envisioned as a bunker buster.[4][7]

In the case of the system mentioned in the 2003 USAF report above, a 6.1m x 0.3m tungsten cylinder impacting at Mach 10 has a kinetic energy equivalent to approximately 11.5 tons of TNT (or 7.2 tons of dynamite). The mass of such a cylinder is itself over 8 tons, so it is clear that the practical applications of such a system are limited to those situations where its other characteristics provide a decisive advantage - a conventional bomb/warhead of similar weight to the tungsten rod, delivered by conventional means, provides similar destructive capability and is a far more practical method.

The highly elongated shape and high density are to enhance sectional density and therefore minimize kinetic energy loss due to air friction and maximize penetration of hard or buried targets. The larger device is expected to be quite good at penetrating deeply buried bunkers and other command and control targets.[8] The smaller "crowbar" size might be employed for anti-armor, anti-aircraft, anti-satellite and possibly anti-personnel use.[citation needed]

The weapon would be very hard to defend against. It has a very high closing velocity and a small radar cross-section. Launch is difficult to detect. Any infra-red launch signature occurs in orbit, at no fixed position. The infra-red launch signature also has a small magnitude compared to a ballistic missile launch. One drawback of the system is that the weapon's sensors would almost certainly be blind during atmospheric reentry due to the plasma sheath that would develop ahead of it, so a mobile target could be difficult to hit if it performed any unexpected maneuvering.[citation needed] The system would also have to cope with atmospheric heating from re-entry, which could melt the weapon.[9]

While the larger version might be individually launched, the smaller versions would be launched from "pods" or "carriers" that contained several missiles.[citation needed]

The phrase "Rods from God" is also used to describe the same concept.[10] A USAF report called them "hypervelocity rod bundles".[11]

________________________________________________________

More on the Tsunami Bomb:

http://www.livescience.com/25949-tsunami-bomb.html

'Tsunami Bomb' Created by US Military
Marc Lallanilla, Life's Little Mysteries Assistant EditorDate: 03 January 2013 Time: 11:53 AM ET

The military has a long and honorable history, but part of that history includes some weapons' experiments that in hindsight seem downright wacky, and some even evil.

Everything from a "gay bomb" that tried to incapacitate soldiers through uncontrollable homosexual urges to extrasensory perception (ESP) experiments that attempted to give soldiers psychic vision have been the subject of serious — and failed — military investigations. And during World War II, the U.S. military devised a way to create a "tsunami bomb," reports the British newspaper the Daily Telegraph.

The tsunami bomb, developed in cooperation with authorities in New Zealand, was designed to inundate an enemy city under a 33-foot (10-meter) tsunami wave. Code-named "Project Seal," the top-secret military operation was created in 1944 after E. A. Gibson, a U.S. naval officer, noticed how using explosives to destroy coral reefs around Pacific islands would often generate large waves, reports the Daily Telegraph.

A series of tests were conducted around New Zealand during the war to evaluate the feasibility of the tsunami bomb — and when done correctly, it worked, according to Ray Waru, a New Zealand author whose book, "Secrets and Treasures" (Random House, 2012), outlines some of the military's lesser-known follies, including extensive UFO investigations.

Apparently, the correct way to create a large tsunami wave is through not one, but several bombs using some 2,200 tons (2 million kilograms) of explosives arrayed in a line about 5 miles (8 kilometers) offshore, according to the Daily Telegraph.

"If you put it in a James Bond movie it would be viewed as fantasy, but it was a real thing," Waru told the Daily Telegraph. "It was absolutely astonishing. First, that anyone would come up with the idea of developing a weapon of mass destruction based on a tsunami ... and also that New Zealand seems to have successfully developed it to the degree that it might have worked."

Concern over the effectiveness of an atomic bomb was the impetus behind Project Seal's tsunami bomb. "Presumably, if the atomic bomb had not worked as well as it did, we might have been tsunami-ing people," Waru told the Daily Telegraph.

The program was abandoned in 1945 before the war ended, though New Zealand authorities continued to produce reports on Project Seal's tsunami bomb into the 1950s, the Daily Telegraph reports.

Follow LiveScience on Twitter @livescience. We're also on Facebook & Google+.

http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2013/01/...zealand-coast/

US reportedly tested secret 'tsunami bomb' off New Zealand coast
Published January 02, 2013
FoxNews.com

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=iQfdl7y-blE

The US Military Tested a Tsunami Bomb That Could Rival the Nuclear Bomb
Casey Chan

We've all seen the destruction that tsunamis can cause. It doesn't play around. But back in 1944, the US military wanted to play around with tsunamis in hope of creating a man made tsunami bomb—basically setting off 10 large blasts in the ocean to create a 33-foot tsunami that would pulverize and drown a city.

New Zealand author and filmmaker Ray Waru discovered these manmade tsunami bombs were set off in the top secret operation of "Project Seal" during World War II. Around 3,700 bombs were detonated during the testing and the tests revealed that a successful tsunami bomb would require "about 2 million kilograms of explosive arrayed in a line about five miles from shore." Not exactly chump change.

Waru told The Telegraph:

"Presumably if the atomic bomb had not worked as well as it did, we might have been tsunami-ing people," said Mr Waru. "It was absolutely astonishing. First that anyone would come up with the idea of developing a weapon of mass destruction based on a tsunami ... and also that New Zealand seems to have successfully developed it to the degree that it might have worked."

'Presumably if the atomic bomb had not worked as well as it did, we might have been tsunami-ing people.'
- New Zealand author and filmmaker Ray Waru

[SilentFeathers]

One thing I'll never forget about this event is that every single video I watched of the tsunami (and I watched tons of videos), not one video showed a building damaged or destroyed by an earthquake first. Even poorly built buildings seemed undamaged or unaffected....Complete towns that were seemingly unaffected by a 9.0 quake were swallowed and destroyed by monster waves.....

You would think that after an off shore 9.0 quake at least some buildings or complete villages would be knocked down before the tsunami came in????? Nope, not that I seen....

[SKIBADABOMSKI]

Yes the buildings were indeed intact. The biggest and most questionable thing that I experienced on that day was the measurements on TV saying 7.9 magnitude. Japan has the most sophisticated earthquake measuring abilities on this planet and yet it took them 5 hours to finally say it was a 9.1.

More I would say is they were ordered to change the magnitude readings. But I was in Tokyo and something was just wrong in the air. The ground swayed for several minuets and everything was shaking like a very high magnitude earthquake was happening but we were on the outskirts of the epicenter. The ground was swaying in intervals for days/weeks...

I know this was an attack and the explosion at Fukushima was a planted explosion. Plan B type. What they didn't expect was for the Japanese to simply not give a rats ass and quickly get on with their lives. Ignoring all fear mongering nuclear warnings. Although I stayed and didn't run away I did go on a trip down to Kyoto to get away from the initial explosion, After all nuclear or not it was an attack.

From that experience I was educated. With the help of everyone here and the wonderful people of Japan. Where I still reside.

[SilentFeathers]

Posted by SKIBADABOMSKI (here)
Yes the buildings were indeed intact. The biggest and most questionable thing that I experienced on that day was the measurements on TV saying 7.9 magnitude. Japan has the most sophisticated earthquake measuring abilities on this planet and yet it took them 5 hours to finally say it was a 9.1.

More I would say is they were ordered to change the magnitude readings. But I was in Tokyo and something was just wrong in the air. The ground swayed for several minuets and everything was shaking like a very high magnitude earthquake was happening but we were on the outskirts of the epicenter. The ground was swaying in intervals for days/weeks...

I know this was an attack and the explosion at Fukushima was a planted explosion. Plan B type. What they didn't expect was for the Japanese to simply not give a rats ass and quickly get on with their lives. Ignoring all fear mongering nuclear warnings. Although I stayed and didn't run away I did go on a trip down to Kyoto to get away from the initial explosion, After all nuclear or not it was an attack.

From that experience I was educated. With the help of everyone here and the wonderful people of Japan. Where I still reside.

If it was swaying buildings in Tokyo, it seems it would of leveled cities in the north closer to the epicenter huh? I seen no clips or news of any villages being destroyed before the waves????

Do you have any knowledge of damage on a mass scale before the waves???

(good to talk to someone about this that was actually there at the time)

[sirdipswitch]

I said it was A bomb the first day. An earthquake will not displace enough water, to cause such a "Tidal Wave". Y'all remember when we called them Tidal Waves, before somebody got cute and adopted the Japanese term.???? For all of the earthquakes off California, every day, it should have been completely destroyed by Tidal waves by now. But nothin. Only very big bombs displace that much water.

Kinda like two planes that took down two towers. hmm.

Do y'all really pay attention?

[SKIBADABOMSKI]

I went up north about a year later to the place where the impact would of been at least 8.5 and all the damage was from the tsunami and very little damage is left from the actual earthquake. I know the Japanese would of repaired stuff quickly so I simply asked locals how bad was it. They described it as crazy shaking form left to right knocking everyone off their feet. Buildings were cracking ect ect and fires erupted and they also said that the shaking never entirely stopped until the waves came. Must of been horrific.

Now in Christchurch New Zealand they just had a wallop that went up and down and that destroyed Christchurch pretty much beyond repair as the city is still like an evacuation center.

One person I spoke to said that they were also in the Great Hanshin Quake and they said the March 11th one was much more terrifying but the Hanshin was more violent. Up and down will flatten everything. Swaying doesn't but on that note they say that the Japanese build buildings to withstand earthquakes.. those intact little wooden huts that were floating in the tsunami were not designed for earthquakes.
Only hotels and schools and skyscrapers ect have this bendy feature. The rest is just wooden houses. I agree that it wasn't as big as they said it was but it felt like a demonic entity was unleashing it's wrath. It really was bizarre.

But it was seriously powerful. I couldn't walk and had to just sit on the floor and watch everything around me shake like crazy and windows shattered and trees fell over ect ect..

Anyway the whole event was predicted and symbolically dated and timed and I think the fact that the event happened was enough to satisfy them. The rest of the scroungers were also informed and they snatched and fought like cat and dog to grab the crumbs from the plate. Which kind of proves that we have more satanic, wish I was a freemason, rich, bored , demented critters out there than we need.

Incidentally I think the devastation results were very different from originally planned but the dates and time of the event were spot on.

[Tesla_WTC_Solution]

Thanks to you all for the serious and detailed (and personal accounts too!) contributions to this thread!

It's no laughing matter, and it's a huge ethical battle, too...

Didn't the "quake" in Japan knock the earth itself off its axis?
Someone commented on that once somewhere...

[Tesla_WTC_Solution]

P.S. about two years ago (minus about a week!),
I sent the equivalent of this story to Alex Jones.

I never received acknowledgment or thanks for any of my story leads for Alex,
not even my Tesla 9-11 demolition theories that Fred Bell and Jesse Ventura backed up,
nor this potentially huge bombshell of a story involving space warfare against a sovereign nation during peacetime.........................

Fiver (watership down clairvoyant): "The field! The field! it's covered in blood!"



Soothsayer (Julius Caesar by Shakespeare): "BEWARE THE IDES OF MARCH!"

[Flash]

Ski, tell us, what do Japanese thing now, on average, about that earthquake and all that followed (nuclear stuff, banking problems, political corruption in Japan, etc). Are they starting to see a link between all these? Do they think this earthquake was natural or not, on average? Are they blaming Chinese, Americans, Koreans, etc?

[Tesla_WTC_Solution]

There was a Kuril/Kermadec Islands conflict involving Russia and China.

there has also been a seafloor rare earths race and God only knows what in the private space sector.

i feel bad for japan...

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=GQ8XbCmqCJ4

[KiwiElf]

The USGS are frequently downgrading the magnitude of quakes.

Ben Fulford also stated, along with others, that both the Japanese & NZ Christchurch quakes were not entirely natural. With that revelation, we discovered there is a US HAARP base in... Christchurch!

Combined with an underwater nuclear explosion to cause the Japanese quake & tsunami, a STUXNET virus was rumoured to be involved, plus a mini-weapon like the one alleged to have been used in 9/11 within the Daichi nuclear powerplant itself to guarantee a complete failure.

Neither quakes registered as a "normal" seismographic signature.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Posted by Tesla_WTC_Solution (here)
Thanks to you all for the serious and detailed (and personal accounts too!) contributions to this thread!

It's no laughing matter, and it's a huge ethical battle, too...

Didn't the "quake" in Japan knock the earth itself off its axis?
Someone commented on that once somewhere...

Yes, as did the enormous Boxing Day Tsunami in Indonesia a few years ago.

[GoodETxSG]

I have seen you bring this up in many Threads,
It is an important subject and I am glad you opened this dedicated thread to the subject. There should be zero doubt in anyone's mind that 3/11 could have been anything but MAN MADE! EVIL MEN DID IT and will do it again... They are holding the threat over the heads of nations that would like to bring change this very moment... Lets not forget the earlier one that killed over 1/3 of a million people now too far away as well.

There are so many advanced weapons bases in Space, above/under ground and the oceans that can cause these seemingly "Natural" events that we can no longer discount any natural appearing event as... well, natural.

You are correct, there were plans back as far as WWI to blow up a certain domrant volcano island causing a land slide that would wipe out the East Coast of the USA... under water rock/land slides are just as easy to cause. The number of ways to do it are almost countless... thermal bomb's dropped on Icesheet's causing miles of ice to slide into the ocean... one could go on and on.

If we spent as much time and money on making this planet a better place for all living beings what a place it would be. AND PEOPLE ACUTALLY ASK... IF THERE ARE ALIENS WHY DON'T THEY JUST COME DOWN AND LAND ON THE WHITE HOUSE LAWN?...
YEA RIGHT!

We are probably the most dangerous beings in our Galaxy... not most powerful, but if we treat our own this way why would any others want to roll the dice with us?

Pardon spelling and grammar, on a handheld device I have never used before...

[Hervé]

Posted by Tesla_WTC_Solution (here)
[...]

Didn't the "quake" in Japan knock the earth itself off its axis?
Someone commented on that once somewhere...

... urban legend...

See this post and following: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post314593

For the Fukushima quake, the raw data as they came in: THAT WAS MASSIVE 9.1 in Japan (Tsunami)

... and my own attempt at understanding the whole thing: What's wrong with that picture?