Trail of Breadcrumbs: Obama, The Resignation of Pope Benedict and the Great Financial Collapse

[GoodETxSG]

Its enough to make anyone sick... Sociopaths and Sex Perverts running the world and no one can put their finger on why we are in such a screwed up place as a planet... hmmm maybe they should ponder a little more. Most of this is coming out in the MSM. Either they are turning a blind eye or do not want to believe...

Posted a bunch more on my Facebook Group Page: https://www.facebook.com/BankAndPoli...cialCorruption
---------------------------------------------
http://www.blacklistednews.com/A_Tra...ories=obinsite

A Trail of Breadcrumbs: The Resignation of Pope Benedict and the Great Financial Collapse
February 15, 2013
Print Version
Source: Richard Gleaves

On Tuesday, February 12th, Pope Benedict XVI shocked the world and his congregation with news that he was resigning the papacy; this is entirely unprecedented in the modern age. The last pope to resign, Gregory XII, did so only to solve a dilemma of leadership in the church. That was 600 years ago, and it hasn’t happened since. Every pope in 600 years has died in the arms of the church.

But not this pope. Regardless of what you believe, it is hard to fathom how, within the Catholic framework, he can justify rejecting the papacy theologically or practically. Despite the advantages of medical care and luxury, despite the prospect of remaining servant of God and meeting his creator as pope, he is rejecting his position in relation to God and walking away.


When something extraordinary happens, one must look for extraordinary circumstances. I think I can explain this sudden resignation, if the reader is prepared to follow a trail of breadcrumbs, link after link in a chain that connects five men. This is not a chain of five conspirators, necessarily, but is intended to show the links between our politics, our financial gurus, and our religious leaders.



First, Barack Obama. The president is bent on running the national debt to its limit. He is pushing to eliminate the debt ceiling, and calling for chump-change revenue while the government wastes trillions pouring cash down sinkhole after sinkhole of boondoggles, swindles and schemes. Every move he makes promises a parabolic curve of rising debt. Why? There are three opinions. Firstly, it is possible that he believes increased spending is the way to save the economy; perhaps his advisors have told him that the depressionary forces of the market must be countered by an inflationary monetary policy or else the economy will collapse. The second possibility is that he knows a collapse is inevitable and is buying time, either for noble motives (sparing Americans the pain in the hope that some last minute save appears) or venal (a shopping spree of spending while the reserve status makes it possible, to secure his constituency and reward his cronies). The third opinion is more sinister. Could Obama be running up the debt to cause the collapse? Who would stand to benefit? And what would happen afterwards? It is difficult to believe that this is the case. How would the man look in the mirror?

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/08/op...-that-can.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/10/op...t-ceiling.html




The second link is Paul Volcker. Volcker is former chairman of the Federal Reserve. He knows the dangers of monetary inflation, having fought back the post-Nixon Shock inflationary wave of the 70s. He was Obama’s advisor on the financial crisis until January, 21st2011. On that date, he resigned his position, ceding it to G.E. CEO Jeffrey Immelt. What had he been working on in his last months? In September 2010, a self-appointed group convened at the grand Palais-Royal in Paris for what became known as the Palais-Royal Initiative. These men were former central bankers from around the world, acting (we are told) on their own. The group was assembled by Tommaso Padoa-Schioppa, an Italian banker considered to be the“Father of the Euro”. (He is also adored by George Soros, who named his own Euro-solution the “Padoa-Schioppa plan”) The purpose of the Palais-Royal initiative? To create a framework for the next phase of monetary policy.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/22/bu.../22immelt.html

http://www.georgesoros.com/articles-..._save_the_euro

http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/.../camdessus.htm

http://www.ieco.clarin.com/economia/...623_0246_4.jpg

On December 18th, just before the penultimate meeting of the group, Padoa-Schioppa died, and the third man in our trail of breadcrumbs appears. The new leader of the Palais-Royal group: Michel Camdessus, French economist and former Managing Director of the IMF. The group came to its conclusion. The report of the Palais-Royal Initiative, issued in January of 2011 (and revised the next month) calls for the creation of a supranational banking power, outside the control of any government, which would issue the global reserve currency in the form of SDRs, a unit of account created at Bretton Woods in 1944. Essentially, Camdessus’ old colleagues at the IMF (and the Bank of International Settlements) want to take over international finance. We can't blame them for trying, right? Camdessus presented the document to French President Sarkozy, and the report was disseminated on October 5th, 2011 among the papers of the G-20, appearing on the abstract as a paper written specifically for the G-20.


http://www.imsreform.org/reserve/docs.html

http://www.global-currencies.org/smi...s-integral.pdf



One may well imagine the response to this paper: "This new banking takeover might work, Monsieur Camdessus, but is it right? Is it moral?" And now the Vatican comes in. We come to our fourth name, that of Cardinal Peter Turkson. Turkson is president of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace. On October 23rd, 2011 (18 days after the G-20 presentation) the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace surprised many by coming out with a proposal that damned “the idolatry of the market” and called for a supranational banking authority identical to the one recommended by the Palais-Royal group. What are the chances? Coincidence? Not when you look on the list of advisors to the Council. There among the names is Michel Camdessus.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/...45887020111024

http://www.omearaferguson.com/in-hou...ancial-crisis/

http://www.justpax.it/pcgp/eng/membri.html



And so we come to the last name on our list, full circle to Pope Benedict XVI. Why is he stepping down so unexpectedly? The answer is to be found, I believe, in the name of the man considered to have the best odds of being our next pope: Cardinal Peter Turkson. According to the Pope’s own brother, Benedict is tormented by the “Vatileaks” scandal, involving leaked Vatican documents indicating money laundering and corruption. This is not to say that Benedict himself is implicated, but he may well be resigning to protect the church, as acquiescence to someone’s threat to release more. Who would possess such documents? The financiers who are on the opposite side of the Vatican trades, naturally. Those financiers who want a new pope in power: Peter Turkson, who is fully on board, and who will declare the IMF schemes to be moral and just when the time comes, a man who is unassailable due to his skin color, who will be commanding the obedience of 1.2 billion Catholics.

If there is any truth to these speculations, whether you believe in a divinity or you don’t, I think you can appreciate and share the sentiment: God help us all.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/100450439

http://www.policymic.com/articles/25...rst-black-pope

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_2669964.html

http://www.businessinsider.com/pope-...tileaks-2013-2


- See more at: http://www.blacklistednews.com/A_Tra....KeG5gtzS.dpuf

=============================
Not to mention this sick O



Cardinal's resignation 'worst crisis since Reformation'
The sudden departure of Cardinal Keith O'Brien over allegations of "inappropriate" behaviour with priests is the worst crisis to hit the Catholic Church in Scotland since the Reformation, an eminent historian has said.

Prof Tom Devine has said Cardinal Keith O'Brien's resignation is the worst crisis for Scotland's Catholic Church since the Reformation Photo: Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images

-----------------------------

The picture Cardinal Keith O'Brien probably wishes he had never posed for: UK's top Catholic was long-standing friend of (Child Rapist) Savile

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz2M6pHmTAf
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[Flash]

Makes complete sense to me what you wrote.

I have been thinking for a while that Obama was buying time for two reasons, make the landing from an unavoidable economic collapse easier overall, and let piggies fill their pockets. In both cases, the only power he has is buying time. He has no power whatsoever over piggies and no power whatsoever against international bankers.

But truth from the Vatican will be leaked (please, honest one over there, do your job) and the bankers centralisation of power will have to be dealt with at some point.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by GoodeTXSG (here)
A Trail of Breadcrumbs: The Resignation of Pope Benedict and the Great Financial Collapse

Yup - makes complete sense to me too.

[RMorgan]

Posted by Flash (here)
Makes complete sense to me what you wrote.

I have been thinking for a while that Obama was buying time for two reasons, make the landing from an unavoidable economic collapse easier overall, and let piggies fill their pockets. In both cases, the only power he has is buying time. He has no power whatsoever over piggies and no power whatsoever against international bankers.

But truth from the Vatican will be leaked (please, honest one over there, do your job) and the bankers centralisation of power will have to be dealt with at some point.

Hey Flash,

I don´t think he´s got the autonomy even to buy time.

In my opinion, he´s just doing what he was supposed to do; All of it is part of the plan.

It will lead, at the right time, to the collapse of the dollar, which will automatically collapse the global economy, or most part of it.

Then, they will come up with a "solution" to save the global economy, probably a global currency, directly managed by one global central bank, and the group behind this organization will be officially the emperors of the world.

You see, I think these folks are tired of hiding. Soon enough, they will show themselves as saviors of humanity and people will be so desperate for a solution that they will have no other option but to comply with them and their obscure rules.

Those who oppose to this new system will be labeled terrorists and hunted down like animals.

So, basically, they´ll come up and say "It´s my way or the highway". Either one lives by their terms and conditions, which will certainly not be democratic, or leave (leaving means death in this case).

I´m afraid this will happen very soon, because other countries and alliances are already making their moves to stop depending on the dollar as an international trade currency, like the BRICS. So, they will have to collapse the global economy before other countries go independent of the dollar.

When they unleash chaos and everyone is utterly desperate and praying for salvation, they will be welcomed as gods. There will be close to zero opposition.

Raf.

[Wind]

The undergound bunkers exist for a reason...

[ghostrider]

Posted by Wind (here)
The undergound bunkers exist for a reason...

the million dollar question, why the undergound cities ???

[GoodETxSG]

Well depending on who you talk to the underground cities have been destroyed or are being stocked up with beans and bullets.

David Wilcock Says Underground Bases Destroyed in 2011 Earthquake???
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...011-Earthquake