March 2013 The Next Great Event in The Awakening!

[SilentFeathers]

Here's some predictions not based on any channeling, densities, quantum magic (or any kind of magic) ET messages, crystal balls, decks of cards...etc etc etc.....just based on pure guess work according to observations and research.

Possible 7.0 or larger quake in California with in the next 72hrs.

They will pick the next pope on March 14th.

Obama will do and or say something absolutely mind boggling while in Israel, Probably on the 22nd.

Comet Panstarrs is really being considered a sign from/of The God Pan by certain groups of people (most likely the conclave is one of those groups of people.)

Pan is the god of the wild, shepherds and flocks, nature of mountain wilds, hunting and rustic music, and companion of the nymphs.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan_(god)

I could go on and on but some may consider me getting a bit carried away!

[RMorgan]

Posted by Wind (here)

Posted by RMorgan (here)
Now, please, anyone. Correct me if I´m wrong ( and I may be wrong indeed). I´d love to hear a truly cohesive explanation about all of this.

I found an old Avalon thread about densities/dimensions:
http://projectavalon.net/forum/showthread.php?t=2743

It might answer your question, but then again it is a whole different thing that will you actually believe it.

I can´t access that thread for some reason, but thanks anyway my friend.

Posted by Anchor (here)
Density - density of light (measured multidimensionally, and with light being the manifest fabric of the infinite universe)

That´s the point, Anchor. If someone manage to explain me how they measured light multidimensionally, then I´ll consider such theory.

I mean, if it was measured, it means that they used tools/equipment/methodology to measure, right? Otherwise, you can´t say it was measured, in the first place.

The main question remains; How did they measured such densities to elaborate such a well defined density classification table?

You see, what I´m trying to do is to uncomplicate something that apparently was deliberately crafted to confuse.

So, in order to enlighten myself about such subject, I´d like to hear the following clarifications:

1- What is the definition of the word density as people in the new age circle use it?
2- What is the subject of density, ie; soul, spirit, etc.
3- How the subject was examined in order to define it´s density; What methodology and apparel was used to conclude, as an example, that humans have density n°3, light bodies have density n°5, angels have density n°8 and then to formulate a whole table of nominal density.
4- What´s the mechanics involved in the process of changing densities?

Well, if all this stuff was made to look scientific, using scientific jargon such as quantum, dimension, frequency and density, then I need to know the trajectory of such theory, how it was constructed, from start to finish.

Look at the chemical elements table, as an example. If you ask a good Chemist to explain it to you, how it was conceived and what are the principles involved in the elaboration of such table, he would certainly be able to explain it to you clearly, without embarrassing himself in the process.

On the other hand, I´ve heard many new age celebrities trying to explain the deal behind the "densities" theory with no cohesion at all. They can´t even achieve a common definition among each other. If it´s such a good and widespread theory, they should know better, right?

It´s relatively simple to explain how to measure the density of planets, stars, rocks, gases and liquids. If someone managed to measure the density of "multidimensional light", or the soul, they need to explain how they did it.

If there isn´t a relatively simple explanation, it´s probably because there is none and the whole theory is unfounded, meaning that it has no solid foundation whatsoever.

Raf.

[Wind]

Anchor did a really wonderful job describing the densities/dimensions. It indeed is a very complex topic...

[Hervé]

Posted by RMorgan (here)
[...]

Do you really think that all of a sudden, all alienated and ignorant individuals that compose the vast majority of Earth´s population, will awake like magic, or better yet, "quantum" magic?

[...]

Cheers,

Raf.

Now, c'mon Raf... of course they will... with a little help from "The Machine" (with a warm welcome from "God"): Must Read: The Matrix Deciphered by Dr Robert Duncan

***********************

Regarding Dolores Canon, hypnosis and how the results compare to reality:

Posted by Amzer Zo (here)

Posted by Wade Frazier (here)
On those ancient civilizations, there is a lot of “golden age” mythology that looks to some distant past when our ancestors had something wonderful that we lost. I am highly wary of those myths anymore, and wonder if there is any fact at all behind them. There have been many New Age myths about the Mayans and Anasazi ascending, advanced technological civilizations that are no more, how all that ancient stonework must have had ET technology behind it, and so on. As the toolset of anthropologists has improved and the efforts of reconstruction have become more multidisciplinary, many of those myths have evaporated. Epic droughts brought an end to the Classic Mayans and the Anasazi, and their declines were not pretty. As anthropologists learned to decipher the Mayan glyphs, the story that came clear was that the Mayans were like all the other ancient civilizations, with elites playing their games, with wars and politics centering around who got the benefit of the agricultural surplus, etc. The Classic Mayan phase ended in a bloodbath, as the city-states warred over shrinking resources. The Anasazi deforested their environment, which contributed to their decline. By the time of the collapse, they were importing logs from as far as fifty miles away, and cannibalism marked their end.

The lessons that our ancient ancestors have to teach us may mostly be cautionary.

[...]

Wade

In corroboration of the above paragraph:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=BYUEnwxPVGk

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=udpC4P6-Rjo

the full set, in 5 parts

https://youtube.com/watch?v=bab6k...feature=relmfu
https://youtube.com/watch?v=BYUEn...feature=relmfu
https://youtube.com/watch?v=QB-N4...feature=relmfu
https://youtube.com/watch?v=miDcd...feature=relmfu
https://youtube.com/watch?v=udpC4...feature=relmfu

Now compare the above to this Dolores Canon interpretation of the same event from the data she collected from patients under "deep hypnosis":

http://the2012scenario.com/2011/05/d...the-new-earth/

The first few minutes of the above video from Dolores were enough for me to realize that something is amiss with her and her results.

With no crops growing... the harvest was of the souls... what a way to ascend!

[Beren]

Anchor;

This has the potential to get very complex very quickly. A new thread may be in order.

Indeed. Here I just have a little revelation from the spirit.
The one who measures densities is the one who imagines itself as a member of one particular, with tendency to either ascend or descend.
The one who we are by nature is out of density beings.

We are God`s children and God itself so we`re able to travel through densities by choice of our will. How and why?

Because our essence and true nature is outside of space and time. Hence we are not bounded by either. Though we sometimes so deeply enjoy the particular density or dimension that we repeatedly return there.
Until we say:"That`s enough. I`m off now."

At a single thought we can travel in whatever density we so choose. Because we are the Source.
Beauty is in remembering this and consciously doing this all the time.

Spirit insight for now over & out

[Quantum Odyssey]

The word Quantum is used because it is a method Dolores Cannon has developed over the last 50yrs and she has written 18some books on the subject and her findings from thousands of sessions. As to why exactly she choose to name her method Quantum you will have to ask her.

There are over 2000 people she has personally trained in her method of Quantum Healing Hypnosis. These two thousand people are from nearly every continent accept Antarctica and the Arctic. We as practitioners all share our collective experience with each other via a private forum.

It's fascinating that in the same week someone from Shanghai, Brisbane, London, New Zealand, Spain, Brazil, Arkansas to California in 4 or more languages reports start to come in all indicating the same information of vibrational attunements to that flash of blue that takes place etc.

How does that happen? I don't know...Why does it happen? I do believe that once to shut down the conscious mind via hypnosis and or meditation people from all over the world are able to tap into that field of knowledge.

As for the left brainers here I can understand your frustration. You want scientific proof, the how's and why's of it all and feel compeled to condemn what you don't understand.

Don't get me wrong..I do believe we all should be discerning, that is why we were born with a brain and the ability to critically think. I don't believe everything I read nor hear..I don't believe everything Dolores says either.
But I do try to keep an open mind to it all because the minute you KNOW anything you close your mind and stop learning.

Interpretation is everything and that is why there are so many variations on new subjects such as the 5th dimension, ascension, awakening etc.

Describe the color blue. Describe the color blue to a blind person who has never seen colors before. What is the color blue? How is the color blue different than other colors? Why is it called blue? Who's idea was that? Maybe blue is really yellow and "they" have been lying to us this whole time.
What is seen under QHH or channeling or vision quest work is seen yet severally limited by the only available words to describe something utterly foreign to our concept of reality with no context to relate it to.

Native American Indian elders described what they saw in their vision quests..the iron horse is coming and it will scar the land etc. how else was the elder to explain the train and the railroad in anything other than terms available in his language.

Think about it...open your minds.

[Chip]

Ok, I'll bite
Been following this thread for the past couple of days and it has been interesting.
Once again we are given a Date. A timeline based on Intuition.
What is Intuition? Is it someone else's thought that makes us happy and feel safe in a time of fearful speculation. Or is it truly our Own? And how can we tell the difference?
Now we have to "get ready" again. Prepare for a grand metaphysical change. This reminds me of growing up in the Roman Catholic Cult of my childhood. Time for confession, so that we can profess our sins and "get ready".
Now please don't get offended, because I myself feel a strong change taking place. Something that boils in my gut yet gives me great hope. I can't define it though nor prove it.
But I don't feel I need to join any group or buy into any book title or Author to help me "get ready" .
For me the grand pleasure of simply enjoying this great ride, through its ups and downs and further turmoils and at the same time living in Love. Is enough.
I don't know if this qualifies being ready or not. But it is the best I can do.
If I have to do the Merkaba for 6 months or meditate on a cotton Matt during a solar eclipse while sniffing grape seed extract. Well, then I guess I will just have to stick with being 3D.

[RMorgan]

Thanks for you answer, my friend.

Posted by Quantum Odyssey (here)
The word Quantum is used because it is a method Dolores Cannon has developed over the last 50yrs and she has written 18some books on the subject and her findings from thousands of sessions. As to why exactly she choose to name her method Quantum you will have to ask her.

Frankly, if she wrote 18 books on the subject and didn´t explain why she calls it Quantum Hypnosis in any of them, then I wont even bother asking her for a deeper explanation.

Again, don´t get me wrong. I know hypnosis works and there are countless documented reports of amazing real, measurable and concrete clinical results achieved through hypnotherapy.

What I don´t and even can´t understand is where the word "quantum" fits in all of it.

Posted by Quantum Odyssey (here)
As for the left brainers here I can understand your frustration. You want scientific proof, the how's and why's of it all and feel compeled to condemn what you don't understand.

Regarding this issue, I´m not frustrated at all.

I´m just a man who likes to question things; If it puts me on the brainer category, then I´ll take it as a compliment.

Anyway, I´m not condemning such theory because I can´t understand it; I´m questioning it because even the preachers of such theory seem to be unable to make it understandable.

I mean, if I´m a brainer, it means that I´m fairly smart; If they can´t explain the fundamentals of such theory to me in a cohesive way, it´s probably not because of my lack of intellectual capacity, but because the theory itself can´t be explained, which leads it to the state of not being a theory at all, but mere unfounded speculation.

If something was measured, qualified and classified, and someone developed a theory out of such measurements, I just want to know how. Am I asking too much here?

I someone understands the foundation behind the density issue, such person should be able to explain it to me, right? I´m listening. I want to understand it.

Like if someone said to me that according to the ultimate mathematics theory available, 2+2=6, I´d say "Ok, but could you please show me how this result was achieved?"

So, there´s a conclusion, the result of a theory´s development. I just want to know how this result was achieved, so I can understand it and maybe, depending on the explanation, accept it.

I´m a very open minded individual but it doesn´t mean I threw my brain on the dump. I´ll never simply believe something just because someone told me so, independently if that person had written a thousand books on the subject.

Cheers,

Raf.

[Quantum Odyssey]

No offense taken none meant.. Ha not brainer, The term I used is Left Brainer as in those who primarily use the left hemisphere I.e. mathematicians, scientists, accountants ...the ones who like concrete physical proof of everything. if they cant see nor verify through scientific method it does exist etc.
As opposed to right brainers who are the creatives, artists, etc
Neither is right nor wrong, both groups use their brains only think differently.

[RMorgan]

Posted by Quantum Odyssey (here)
No offense taken none meant.. Ha not brainer, The term I used is Left Brainer as in those who primarily use the left hemisphere I.e. mathematicians, scientists, accountants ...the ones who like concrete physical proof of everything. if they cant see nor verify through scientific method it does exist etc.
As opposed to right brainers who are the creatives, artists, etc
Neither is right nor wrong, both groups use their brains only think differently.

Thanks for pointing my misunderstanding. English is not my first language, so I´m still fighting to overcome the language barrier.

Could you believe I´m an artist? Yes, I make a good living out of creativity.

However, I have a very good scientific mind as well. I love science.

I guess that means I use both of my brain´s hemispheres in balance.

Anyway, I don´t need proof to believe things; Beliefs don´t require proof, of course.

I need proof to know things, and if something was brought to the realm of knowledge, shaped as a theory that includes the use of several well established scientific jargon, then I need to know the process behind the development of such.

As long as people continue to refer to this density issue as if it is a form of science; As long as people keep giving lectures and selling thousands of books on this subject as if it has scientific profundity; Then I will rightfully request for proof and evidence.

At the moment people admit that there´s nothing scientific to it; That the applied scientific jargon are purely embellishments, then I will just treat it as I treat all beliefs; with respect and impartiality.

Cheers,

Raf.

[Anchor]

Posted by RMorgan (here)
That´s the point, Anchor. If someone manage to explain me how they measured light multidimensionally, then I´ll consider such theory.

I mean, if it was measured, it means that they used tools/equipment/methodology to measure, right? Otherwise, you can´t say it was measured, in the first place.

The main question remains; How did they measured such densities to elaborate such a well defined density classification table?

You see, what I´m trying to do is to uncomplicate something that apparently was deliberately crafted to confuse.

I think I need some time and will answer this in more detail later.

At some point, the finite world of physics gives way to the undefined world of the infinite and we take our steps into the pathless land, the noosphere of the "unknown".

Staking an intellectual claim in that space, especially when you cant prove anything is never going to result in cleanly resolved understanding and will end up with differences of opinion.

Threads like this explore the borders between the known and the unknown.

Complexity is inevitable, as is the opportunities for people to exploit the confusion for their own ends. I think we both want to try to do something about that.

I will try to get more specific in a couple of days if not tonight (my time).

You may in the mean time, tell me its not worth the effort, if you do, I can respect that. I may still try anyway because its one way for me to learn.

[RMorgan]

Posted by Anchor (here)
You may in the mean time, tell me its not worth the effort, if you do, I can respect that. I may still try anyway because its one way for me to learn.

Far from it man! Every insight you may have regarding this or any other subject will be highly appreciated!

I´m just trying to clarify things here as much as you. I hope we can learn from each other in the process.

For now, I don´t agree or disagree with the density/ascension idea itself for I see it as a belief and, as such, I reserve me the right to remain impartial.

The only thing regarding this that I strongly oppose to is the fact that they try to pass it as science, as something that involves a logic, as an observable phenomenon that can be measured and quantified.

So, As far as I can observe, this issue is pure and simple pseudoscience.

Pseudoscience is a claim, belief, or practice which is presented as scientific, but does not adhere to a valid scientific method, lacks supporting evidence or plausibility, cannot be reliably tested, or otherwise lacks scientific status.

Pseudoscience is often characterized by the use of vague, contradictory, exaggerated or unprovable claims, an over-reliance on confirmation rather than rigorous attempts at refutation, a lack of openness to evaluation by other experts, and a general absence of systematic processes to rationally develop theories.

The definition fits perfectly, right? Really, it fits like a glove..."a general absence of systematic processes to rationally develop theories".

Unfortunately, pseudoscientific artifices have been used for centuries to add fabricated value to superficial ideas which don´t have enough substance to stand on their own, attracting the attention of uneducated persons who lack the means to properly evaluate such ideas, for several purposes; the financial purpose being the most common.

Raf.

[Delight]

Posted by Anchor (here)

Posted by RMorgan (here)
That´s the point, Anchor. If someone manage to explain me how they measured light multidimensionally, then I´ll consider such theory.

I mean, if it was measured, it means that they used tools/equipment/methodology to measure, right? Otherwise, you can´t say it was measured, in the first place.

The main question remains; How did they measured such densities to elaborate such a well defined density classification table?

You see, what I´m trying to do is to uncomplicate something that apparently was deliberately crafted to confuse.

At some point, the finite world of physics gives way to the undefined world of the infinite and we take our steps into the pathless land, the noosphere of the "unknown".

Staking an intellectual claim in that space, especially when you cant prove anything is never going to result in cleanly resolved understanding and will end up with differences of opinion.

Threads like this explore the borders between the known and the unknown.

Complexity is inevitable, as is the opportunities for people to exploit the confusion for their own ends. I think we both want to try to do something about that.

Thanks Mindy for a lift today. George Kavassilas has targeted the Equinox for something big too. He has held to this date with changes in what he believes may occur.

Oh Joy, I love the vision of a blue light sweeping through the collective mind and all the synthetic programs wiped clean. It sounds like Metanoia that is talked about in Christianity.

We absolutely have many different opinions about what is possible and I hear that I AM the observer of my experience. This gives me rights and responsibilities. Lots I cannot mentally grasp.

Taking into account that the observer is absolutely necessary for a wave to collapse to a particle, I believe that some of us have become capable of very unusual observation. It has to do with capacity to have a larger frame of reference.

Walter Russell is so beyond my brain comprehension and his science may disagree with other "views" but this picture is totally engrossing. The capacity to comprehend more and the ability to understand what is true is my intention.

[syrwong]

IMHO Chanellers or whoever using the subconcious are never able to pinpoint a time, even in year terms. When they experience the future, they are lost in time (because it does not exist?) and cannot bring back the time information. Nevertheless, this month of March is important because of the arrival of the last pope. I have a feeling that his coming may be 'heralded' with something big, like the lightnings of 112.

[RMorgan]

Posted by Delight (here)
Thanks Mindy for a lift today. George Kavassilas has targeted the Equinox for something big too. He has held to this date with changes in what he believes may occur.

Yes, he predicted that Earth itself will become a star...I´ll let him alone, first because planets totally lack the properties to become stars and second because he already has one of the most extensive collections of failed ascension predictions among all the new age gurus.

Posted by Delight (here)
The capacity to comprehend more and the ability to understand what is true is my intention.

I really liked the image and I agree 100% with this sentence, mate.

However, if we already made mistakes regarding the hard science achieved from what we can observe with our five senses, which is indeed a small spectrum of existence, let alone the mistakes we´ve made regarding beliefs based on the unobservable, specially religion and its consequences.

Regarding ascension, even if it is a phenomenon connected to the unobservable part of the spectrum, just like gravity, which its also unobservable by itself, its results should be observable.

So, if someone here ever ascend to the 5D, please, let me know about it. Then I´ll believe it. I must say that is very likely that we both die from old age without seeing the fantasy of ascension materialize.

Raf.

[panopticon]

What is the background of the participant "E" in this session.
Was there a predisposition towards, or anticipation of, certain events occurring in the future that coloured the responses of "E".

-- Pan

[enfoldedblue]

Hi, I can still only get online on my ph...but just figured out how to cut and paste. While i absolutely do not subscribe to dates, and believe the shift to be a process more than an event, i was struck by content of the hypnosis session because there are consistencies with a vision i had a few years ago. Here is what i wrote right after.

I experienced an incredibly beautiful, rich, loving energy that was moving as a network of blue currents over the planet. It vibrated at both a high, ecstatic frequency, and rumbled slowly like sexy thunder, penetrating and re-establishing itself deep in the hearts of all that are open. I could see that this power is limitless, and understood that once established it has the capacity to spread like a tidal wave.The beauty was so overwhelming I cried deliriously. I felt in complete awe, and was graciously humbled by the absolute exquisite nature of what I had just witnessed.As my consciousness re-focused on my present, physical surrounds I was left with the echoing of a thought “we cannot even begin to imagine the depth and beauty of what is afoot.”

[Hervé]

Hi everyone!

Some of you may remember this one:

Posted by Amzer Zo (here)
Some "old fashion" way of looking at things:

Density:

It's only the amount of material contained in a unit of space... hence a degree of condensation of said material within a unit of space (volume).

What changes the density of any material is its state of "agitation" or the speed at which it is vibrating (frequency).

Hence, iron whether in solid, liquid or gaseous state... is still "iron," that's something that's lost to too many.

In this physical universe, what allows transitions from one range of density to another is "heat" (radiated energy) which provides the energy to agitate (liquefy) or de-agitate (solidify, when withdrawn) molecules relationships.

In the spiritual universe, my take is that the equivalent to "heat" is "love" but it's still a "universe" reducible to 3 dimensions....


Dimension/Space:

Now, for the big shock: Any space can be reduced to three, and only three (3) dimensions.

Time is only a factor introduced to re-arrange the space that remains a 3-dimensional one.

Any universe which uses space to locate objects in it has only three dimensions since the prerequisite for interaction is the possibility of interferences between waves (frequency matching allowing for holographic constructions; vivid "dreams" more "real" than physical "reality").

Time travel is only a looking at that space with a specific arrangement of the various objects in it. Hence the different remote viewing outcomes depending on the variables/factors taken into account.


So... "transdimensionals"... not quite, but better sounding than "transdensity manifestations." Etc...


To summarize, instead of invoking the "Dear dad, forgive them for they know not of what they speaketh," I would say "Man! Bust these miscreants for confusing the issue beyond recognition!"

It follows that anything from "higher densities" which has the ability to interfere with this universe must have this universe's "dimensions" in common. Otherwise it wouldn't be able to interfere or interact with this universe... and that's a 3 dimensional universe/space (hence, there aren't any other dimensions beyond length, width and height).


Anything that is part of a universe (whatever the density it's at in its existence) is interferable with because, at that particular density, it has a physicality, i.e energies or "things" can interfere with any other part of that particular universe.

Only that which has remained outside of universes (i.e. outside of space with a time modifier) is untouched but also unaware (no perception for a non-created universe that’s not its own)

So, densities can be extrapolated into the higher frequency ranges beyond FTL and frequencies/waves can still produce interferences and standing waves and therefore create "solid" holograms within a frequency/density range... we just need to create instruments to detect and measure FTL frequencies

Then one runs into the abyss of no space, and therefore no time, when the wavelength gets to "zero" with an infinitely high frequency/speed. That's the domain of a true "static" define as a quality that has no dimension, no mass, no wavelength and no location which is the definition of "ZERO" as being not a thing but yet affects existing things... hence having "qualities."

[Flash]

Posted by Amzer Zo (here)
Hi everyone!

Some of you may remember this one:

Posted by Amzer Zo (here)
Some "old fashion" way of looking at things:

Density:

It's only the amount of material contained in a unit of space... hence a degree of condensation of said material within a unit of space (volume).

What changes the density of any material is its state of "agitation" or the speed at which it is vibrating (frequency).

Hence, iron whether in solid, liquid or gaseous state... is still "iron," that's something that's lost to too many.

In this physical universe, what allows transitions from one range of density to another is "heat" (radiated energy) which provides the energy to agitate (liquefy) or de-agitate (solidify, when withdrawn) molecules relationships.

In the spiritual universe, my take is that the equivalent to "heat" is "love" but it's still a "universe" reducible to 3 dimensions....


Dimension/Space:

Now, for the big shock: Any space can be reduced to three, and only three (3) dimensions.

Time is only a factor introduced to re-arrange the space that remains a 3-dimensional one.

Any universe which uses space to locate objects in it has only three dimensions since the prerequisite for interaction is the possibility of interferences between waves (frequency matching allowing for holographic constructions; vivid "dreams" more "real" than physical "reality").

Time travel is only a looking at that space with a specific arrangement of the various objects in it. Hence the different remote viewing outcomes depending on the variables/factors taken into account.


So... "transdimensionals"... not quite, but better sounding than "transdensity manifestations." Etc...


To summarize, instead of invoking the "Dear dad, forgive them for they know not of what they speaketh," I would say "Man! Bust these miscreants for confusing the issue beyond recognition!"

It follows that anything from "higher densities" which has the ability to interfere with this universe must have this universe's "dimensions" in common. Otherwise it wouldn't be able to interfere or interact with this universe... and that's a 3 dimensional universe/space (hence, there aren't any other dimensions beyond length, width and height).


Anything that is part of a universe (whatever the density it's at in its existence) is interferable with because, at that particular density, it has a physicality, i.e energies or "things" can interfere with any other part of that particular universe.

Only that which has remained outside of universes (i.e. outside of space with a time modifier) is untouched but also unaware (no perception for a non-created universe that’s not its own)

So, densities can be extrapolated into the higher frequency ranges beyond FTL and frequencies/waves can still produce interferences and standing waves and therefore create "solid" holograms within a frequency/density range... we just need to create instruments to detect and measure FTL frequencies

Then one runs into the abyss of no space, and therefore no time, when the wavelength gets to "zero" with an infinitely high frequency/speed. That's the domain of a true "static" define as a quality that has no dimension, no mass, no wavelength and no location which is the definition of "ZERO" as being not a thing but yet affects existing things... hence having "qualities."

Knowingly or not AmerZo, you are right in into the deep breath of very high spirituality. How often advance people have said that beyond knowing there was nothing, a flat line, with qualities. The Source that wants to project itself into illusion/hologramsDensities/dimensions to know itself. Illusion because nothing is. Illusion being the experiencer.

[greybeard]

I dont have the scientific background to full understand the excellent posts on dimensions ---I mainly right brained now also.

As a parallel Dr David Hawkins said that we are about to see a new earth not as such through a physical change but as a change in perception.
When asked about The Book of Revelations he said that it was channelled and of a low vibration and that Armageddon would be fought out on the lower astral.
A change in perception makes sense to me in two ways.
1st--- there are things present out with our visual and audio range at this moment-- can be seen with ultra violet and other modifications etc.
2nd --if we literally see things differently (mentally, emotionally, included) we change things.---the observer affect.
Let us hope
Chris