Bill Brockbrader ("Bill Wood") finally debunked

[Nerge]

Posted by K.W.B (here)
Is this really that much of a surprise given the nature of his alleged former job?
The testimony of the likes of Kaye Griggs, shows us the tactics they use control & silence people!
I am not condoning any behaviour just wanted to point this out before witch hunting takes a hold.

Point well made - it's interesting to see how rabid some appear to become whenever the Brockbrader subject is raised, almost as if it's a personal mission of theirs to prove and highlight his 'guilt'.

Considering the types of topics we deal with day-to-day here, and how many examples we have of the PTW screwing with people with potentially damaging information to expose; yet in this case it's apparently a done deal.

He's being judged in their system by their 'employees' - I'm sure it's all aboard, right?

One way or another the full truth with full data will come out at some point; sorry if I don't buy into their system's version of it - too much potential for corruption at this point and in this case.

Some may be happy to to see this as a done deal, but I feel it is not done yet; there's more to this story I think, time as they say will tell.

[kersley]

I think I give Avalon a miss this evening. I'm sure someone will come along soon and SHOUT April FOOLS...
I just fell for the youtube shutting down one. Please not again..

[Kimberley]

Hey I just realized this thread is in the "Ufology, Extraterrestrial Contact" topic...why is that?

Anyway I now have confirmation from Gayle at nw transcripts that the incomplete pdf is real.

I will share my e-mail correspondence below.

So now I am waiting for Eva to reply to me and tell me why Bill said under oath that he was not a SEAL. That is the part that has me perplexed and I want to know what she has to say about that before I come to my final conclusion.

Perhaps he chose to lie about that under oath to protect himself and others...I do not know about this part. And I am not judging any of this I am just wondering.

ALL The best!!

*************************
READ FROM BOTTOM UP
**************************

Yes, this is an audio recording from the federal court in Boise, Idaho. A
transcript is not made of every case, just ones where either party has an
issue, i.e. appealing, or writing a brief, et cetera. So, yes, this case
was heard in December and a transcript was not ordered until February and
completed in March, (a 30 day order). The ordering party, which was the
U.S. Attorney's Office here in Boise is the only one I show that placed an
order on this case. I have had no other copy orders. I did have someone
from back east call me about a week ago inquiring about a copy, but decided
instead to order a CD disk instead from the court. In comparing my pages it
looks identical to what is posted on the internet. I hope I've answered all
your question, if it would help we can talk via telephone. Thanks.

Gayle


-----Original Message-----
From: Kimberley
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 2:08 PM
To: Gayle Lutz
Subject: Re: An Important question about a transcript!!

Thank you for your reply.

It appears that this case was December 19 2012 and dated as transcribed
3/13/13. Is that typical to not transcribe until months later?

Was this transcribed from an audio recording of the trial?

Has anyone else contacted you asking these questions?

If not did you open the file I sent and compare it with what you have?...I
want to be sure this is not a forgery and is the same as what you have. And
yes I realize it is not a full transcript.

Thank you very much for your time answering my questions.

Kimberley


On Apr 2, 2013, at 3:56 PM, Gayle Lutz wrote:

Kimberley,

This is actually a case that we transcribed in March. I see that
whoever is putting this on the internet has only put sections up. The
total page count of this case is 47 pages. Let me know if I can help
you with anything else.
Thank you.

Gayle.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kimberley
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 1:02 PM
To: gayle@nwtranscripts.com
Subject: An Important question about a transcript!!

Gayle,

I left you a voice message and am following it up with this e-mail.

https://cdn.anonfiles.com/1364579257312.pdf

This (incomplete) pdf transcript is circulating on the internet and I
want to know if this is real or a forgery. Your name and company are
attached to it.

If this is real why is the date on the last page after the
Transcribers name 03/13/13?

Thank you for you assistance.

Kimberley

[music]

This was my comment on the donate a dollar campaign: An Old Con Man's Trick and Distraction from Purpose

That really should have rung alarm bells for everyone.

[Agape]

I just happened to be reading here so sorry for the brief intrusion to your time-space .
Kimberley deserves thanks for inquiring about authenticity of the transcript which is very telling in my opinion.
It was clear from the glance almost that many claims made in the course of that interview were well prepared to fit the 'whistleblower agenda' ,
and like with many other 'whistleblowers' in these interviews ..story is/was being created on a go.

I likewise do not think that the 'rape and punishment' scenario comprises the very hard core of the trouble here. Yes it could be perfect cover story to get rid of a man forever. Period.

On the other hand ... what annoys me a LOT is how many of these 'whistleblowers' would definitely alter or even deny their testimony when facing court hearing,
does it matter on what ?

No it does not. There are some who want to testify in front of parliament members, again , it's usually 'former parliament members' instead 'standing parliament members' it seems to me so what's all the theater about if the same people would fail if facing legal court hearing on any such a matter .

Falling to hands of justice can be result of good or bad luck in some instances but who can really rob you of the right to speak truth ?



As far as I'm concerned ..and my report ignored by most of the alternative media for not suting their immediate agendas and military stories,
and the style of how people 'out there' relate to it, as if it was a fairy tale just because I'm not a member of the military apparatus and do not claim to have any such 'valid' connection with what's already circling around for 60 years ,
is disgraceful as well in many instances and I can pretty assure you that I am free to state the same what I did in the Camelot interview in front of any righteous court with full details and no shame .

[ThePythonicCow]

There was some discussion in this thread regarding the appropriateness of sex with a 12 year old. I removed that discussion (12 posts and a couple of sentences in other posts.) While in the personal experience of some, or in some genetic abstract, sex with a 12 year old may be defensible, we do live in a society where such abuse is endemic and can cause severe and lasting trauma, so it is asked that other members respect the pain that some of us have to deal with.

[Flash]

i wish I could have answered Carmody, I had a scientific answer that contradicted his point as well as Kimberly's. Well, another time.

[Kimberley]

Posted by Flash (here)
i wish I could have answered Carmody, I had a scientific answer that contradicted his point as well as Kimberly's. Well, another time.

Ok I guess this thread is open again... Flash what do you mean by "I had a scientific answer that contradicted his point as well as Kimberly's"

[Vitalux]

The hope in threads like this .....is that it is to reminder to us all......that sometimes we just have to laugh both at ourselves and at life.

I LOVE Bill Brockbrader ( aka or Bill Wood) as a spirit.
I feel so sorry for what battles, trials, and tribulations that this man has encountered.
I am sure, had it been me walking in his shoes, I too might have buckled under the pressure that living as a human being causes.

One thing we can't deny is we all share naiveness that goes with being in human form.

A good thing about being human and telling untruths, eventually it all comes out in the wash.

I am also in LOVE with Truth, and I follow it to where it takes me, which I hope one day....is back home.

[DeDukshyn]

Posted by Kimberley (here)

Posted by Flash (here)
i wish I could have answered Carmody, I had a scientific answer that contradicted his point as well as Kimberly's. Well, another time.

Ok I guess this thread is open again... Flash what do you mean by "I had a scientific answer that contradicted his point as well as Kimberly's"

Let's leave this alone ... and let's keep in mind what a personal opinion is -(to flash), and leave this issue at that.

[ghostrider]

Posted by Flash (here)
I am sorry S-L. A rapist is a rapist, and yes, there is many. Once violence is link to sex, which is one of the strongest instinct in human beings, well once violence is linked to sex, this kind of programation is very difficult to undo.

And what did the kid learned in this, not to trust men in general??????

Violence done to women worldwide is often thought of as " well this is a lesson learned" (low life voice intended here) or "we should forgive him an give him a chance". Is this male guilt that makes on say that, I do not know, but one thing is sure, these guys should go to jail, whichever their age, because the are pedophiles and there is no cure for this to start with. Second, nobody give a hand to the victim instead, but to the rapist. This is utterly sick.

Now, if we extrapolate just a tiny little, this kind of thinking does lead to child abuse being protected in the pedophiliac ring in England, in USA, Canada and all over the world, and to satanism acceptance as well.

Someone once told me "they have a soul", yes, they do, and when they will start behaving with their soul input, they won't be able to rape anymore. In the meantime, put them away so they cannot harm.

ET made our DNA to be that of warriors with a short life span, we originally were to be their army because they removed violence from their being, and were pushed out of their home world by another warrior race ... violence is in all of us, just some of us refuse to give in , we keep it in control of the higher self ...I dig your post ... Brockbrader always kinda struggled to speak , and I never understood that coming from a so called soldier ...

[Vitalux]

Posted by Kimberley (here)

Posted by Flash (here)
i wish I could have answered Carmody, I had a scientific answer that contradicted his point as well as Kimberly's. Well, another time.

Ok I guess this thread is open again... Flash what do you mean by "I had a scientific answer that contradicted his point as well as Kimberly's"

Kim with all do respect and love....lets keep this thread from getting into heated debates. My hope is that we are going to refrain from taking it into the opinions that caused it to get locked in the first place.
I adore Paul's patience, but I respect that it has limits too.

[jackovesk]

Talk about 'LESSONS LEARNED'..!

Unified Serenity - You were right all the way along...



Bill Brockbrader / Woods Admits He’s a Child Rapist
http://unifiedserenity.wordpress.com...-child-rapist/

...and what did you get for your Honesty, nothing but ABUSE..!

PS - Your (WRONG) about Bill Ryan though, he had nothing to do with it...

[JohnEAngel]

seems to me that any 'whistle-blower' can be wholly subjected to the domination of TPTB and not TPTW as they still seem to have quite a stranglehold on the human race. not saying that i disbelieve only asking how can we trust, consider or accept anything anymore?

[Flash]

Posted by Kimberley (here)

Posted by Flash (here)
i wish I could have answered Carmody, I had a scientific answer that contradicted his point as well as Kimberly's. Well, another time.

Ok I guess this thread is open again... Flash what do you mean by "I had a scientific answer that contradicted his point as well as Kimberly's"

My answer would make the thread derail once again, so I refrain. IT was not personal opinion Debuishin but out of the thread topic.

[Carmody]

Posted by Flash (here)
i wish I could have answered Carmody, I had a scientific answer that contradicted his point as well as Kimberly's. Well, another time.

I believe you, I never said I supported it. It was looked at with no emotion. No need to cover it. Too much emotion, not enough rational thinking. Put the ego down, walk away from it. Does a person's body rule their thoughts, of can they see through it's coloration? can they clear that coloration? In effect, that has been the core of the hook and the line, for the fish to squirm on, since the dawn of time and the idea of having a body. Nothing more than that.

As for Brockbrader, I've no idea. Never really looked at him or the interview, beyond some casual viewing, in order to get a feel for it.

I'm from the backwoods. You know what happens to people who do such things, in those locales...and are caught. Things that don't end well - For anyone who is involved, on any side of it. If anyone is satisfied with any of those backwoods situations, those questions and answers, then there is something fundamentally wrong with them.

[Sirius White]

I never really saw the interview. But you can still be a "rapist" AND a whistleblower yall know that right?

Now that being said, they could be burying him. Doesn't mean that he wasn't a rapist. It could be they are just enforcing that angle full force to shut him up. Period.

[Flash]

Posted by Carmody (here)

Posted by Flash (here)
i wish I could have answered Carmody, I had a scientific answer that contradicted his point as well as Kimberly's. Well, another time.

I believe you, I never said I supported it. It was looked at with no emotion. No need to cover it. Too much emotion, not enough rational thinking. Put the ego down, walk away from it. Does a person's body rule their thoughts, of can they see through it's coloration? can they clear that coloration? In effect, that has been the core of the hook and the line, for the fish to squirm on, since the dawn of time and the idea of having a body. Nothing more than that.

As for Brockbrader, I've no idea. Never really looked at him or the interview, beyond some casual viewing, in order to get a feel for it.

I'm from the backwoods. You know what happens to people who do such things, in those locales...and are caught. Things that don't end well - For anyone who is involved, on any side of it. If anyone is satisfied with any of those backwoods situations, those questions and answers, then there is something fundamentally wrong with them.

I am misunderstood Carmody but that is fine cause I was not clear not wanting to derail the thread. So, all, allow me derailing for 2 minutes. I was answering to Carmody's statement that kifd girls are ready for se x at 13. Which is, following natures and menses, true.

However, my point was not emotional, it was statistical. Although the hormones are starting to work on them at that age, they are not ready for s e x. Why:

I will have to search for the statistics but what I know is the following: although girls menstruate at 13 on average (Carmody's point) and although sexual desire, thanks to hormonal input, may be there at 12, therefore some form of desire (I do remember my 11 years old), this does not mean at all that the mind and body are ready for it.

In fact, a 12 years old getting pregnant will almost assuredly die in childbirth if left to natural delivery. She will just not open up, her hips are not ready. Her body is not ready for childbirth. Even for most 15 years old, death is to be contemplated, so, with the actual epidemic of teenage pregnancies, most doctor will deliver through c section because the risk of mother's mortality are much too high and frequent (not because of their insurance).

I bet anything that the brain overall readiness parallels the body readiness.

No problems with deliveries start at around 16 on average, when the girl is finished growing up. On average, she finishes growing up about 2 to 21/2 years after her first menses.

I also bet anything that it is why most societies in the past were very adamant at making sure the girls do not get pregnant, therefore married, before their 16 years, la fiesta rosa for spaniard, sweet sixteen for British, why, because now they are ready to meet boys and have children.

To me, marrying little 9-12-13 years old as in some countries is only a demonstration of how women and girls are considered, like pieces of nothing that makes no difference if they die in childbirth.

[PathWalker]

Greetings Reader,

I sense with my intuition that:
1. Brockbrader is framed and he picked the best option for him.
2. The information coming from a whistle blower, is valued Intelligence information regardless the whistle blower personal character and morals.

That was my intuition, as for my mind.
We always receive information that is half truth and semi truths. It takes experience and skills to filter the nuggets. And we make mistakes all the time.
The information received from Brockbrader was not 100% true, and it is fullish to expect that.

[music]

Whistleblowers are dangerous because the ones that are agenda-driven speak as much truth as the ones who are true to themselves. The tricky bit is that amongst the truth in the (lets face it) agent's postings, there is at best misdirection, at worst, words framed to insinuate ideas that might, on a conscious level, be rejected. It is very cleverly done, and many find their ideas changed to suit the agenda as a result. If in doubt, consult your heart.

Sexuality is a different matter, most people cannot discuss it rationally, and few have a deep heart-based understanding of what it entails. Best not to discuss it as relating to minors, and best to accept the fact that as adults, we have a massive responsibility in that regard, and that most of us are ego and biology-driven in regards to sex, not driven by spirit.