Observer clearly said in the last paragraph of his OP,Posted by Flash (here)
By dismissing critical thinking on concept right away because they are subjective, you are, in my idea, going away from evolution and discoveries
I have seen critical thinking based on personal evidence rejected by the op for not being objective.
Posted by observer (here)
Once any individual begins interpreting any objective data, those interpretations become a subjective understanding and unique to only that individual. Therefore, what I have summarized (above) are nothing more than my own personal subjective observations. Synthesize them into your belief system in whatever fashion that suits your perceptions (free will).
I think there are already enough threads where one can participate according to the stream of life with all that it involves (personal, objective, heart, mind, research, name it all) without any restrictions given beforehand.Posted by Flash (here)
You have here a wonderful thread, just let it participate in the stream of life with all that it involves (personal, objective, heart, mind, research,name it)
So, let's now take up the challenge observer is offering us here, which is finding the answer to the question: What controls the hologram?.... with one restriction,.... leaving out any interpretation or critical thinking based on data that could have been obtained from, or influenced by constructed religion, channeled material or other manipulated evidence.
That's the only thing he has been asking from us.
I don't understand why this is so upsetting to some members.




Reply With Quote