Was the 6.3 quake in Iran Engineered?

[marlowe]

April 9 has been Nuclear Technology Day in Iran since 2006....

The 6.3 was shallow 6.2 miles deep...this is always an indicator of an engineered quake...

The quake hit at 3:22 PM local time in southern Iran not far from an Iraian nuke plant...hundreds dead or injured....322 is the Skull & Bones code number...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skull_and_Bones

Today is the 10th anniversary of the capture of Bagdad by US military in 2003....

I have been interested in HAARPed quakes for the last 3 years...you can google
'quakes HAARPed on scientology holidays & christian holy days 'to see my research....

[sheme]

I confess this possibility flashed through my mind. Peace and love to the souls injured by this event.

[syrwong]

Not just a possibility. Pretty convincing numbers they picked too.

[marlowe]

the link is in German ,,so i won't post it...,but it says 2 cities are mostly destroyed....one is 10 thousand people and the other is 20 thousand people ..+ 2 villages of 3 K each....the nuke reactors are untouched thankfully....

[WyoSeeker]

Not disputing this idea because of the other coincidences but the news stories I saw put the local time at 4:22.

Still, an earthquake hits an Iranian nuclear reactor while Iran is celebrating Nuclear Technology Day?!?

Just a coincidence I'm sure. "Nothing to see here folks, move along."

[marlowe]

@Wyoseeker...
USGS is saying the quake happenend at 03:22:50 at epicenter.....
maybe your source was a time zone away from the epicenter....

[Hervé]

Looks like a pretty normal earthquake to me (as recorded at La Gomera station, Canary Islands):


MAG UTC DATE-TIME h:m:s ___LAT___ LON _ DEPTH km Region

MAP 6.3 2013/04/09 11:52:50 28.500 51.591 10.0 SOUTHERN IRAN




Now, the above is a fact.

What are your facts as claimed in the OP?

[Selene]

AmerZo, is there some way to distinguish the data on a 'natural' quake from a 'Haarp' version?

Just wondering. A mini-seminar with examples would be helpful (even as a separate thread if necessary), if you can provide such.

Many thanks,

Selene

[marlowe]

Posted by Selene (here)
AmerZo, is there some way to distinguish the data on a 'natural' quake from a 'Haarp' version?

Just wondering. A mini-seminar with examples would be helpful (even as a separate thread if necessary), if you can provide such.

Many thanks,

Selene

Selene: the best thread I started and worked on related to the quakes near Christchurch,New Zealand.....here is the link>>>>

http://tinfoilpalace.eamped.com/2011...s-christian-h/

the mod on that forum lived in NZ and also contributed to it greatly....Engineered quakes are always shallow
{between 10 & 30 KMs...}...they often happen near the top of the hour.

[Hervé]

Posted by Selene (here)
AmerZo, is there some way to distinguish the data on a 'natural' quake from a 'Haarp' version?

Just wondering. A mini-seminar with examples would be helpful (even as a separate thread if necessary), if you can provide such.

Many thanks,

Selene

Good question!

The one thing I know is the distinction that can be made with nuclear devices underground explosions/tests:

With earthquakes attributed to HAARP, one would have to find evidence of the ground being "resonated" up to rupture as described by Dr. Brooks Agnew:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=m95hhRRuDv8

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=j1jIjx0XF_U

Check also this classic "Holes In Heaven" video for an overview on the capabilities of HAARP and derived technologies:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=oZBSj9LbMFs

So far, the only earthquake that was accompanied by a sustained electromagnetic resonance was the 3/11 one in Japan and its accompanying tsunami:

(Click on picture to enlarge)

[Hervé]

Posted by marlowe (here)
[...]

....Engineered quakes are always shallow
{between 10 & 30 KMs...}...they often happen near the top of the hour.

Sorry marlowe but this "evidence" is so vague and all encompassing that all the earthquakes that have occurred under the El Hierro island, Canary Islands, can be made to fit that model....




That's close to 20,000 earthquakes...

[ghostrider]

most quakes are deep in the earth, when I see the depth at 10 km, I get suspicious ...to me the crust movement should originate much deeper ... the depth of 10km always catches my attention, like it jumps out to me in 3-D screaming look again ...

[Hervé]

Moreover, the area within which the Iran EQ occurred was pinpointed by Stan Deyo on April 8 in his map of anomalous thermal gradient:



The area is also located along a tectonically active fracture zone which goes up to Turkey and into the Mediterranean.

[ghostrider]

Posted by Amzer Zo (here)
Moreover, the area within which the Iran EQ occurred was pinpointed by Stan Deyo on April 8 in his map of anomalous thermal gradient:



The area is also located along a tectonically active fracture zone which goes up to Turkey and into the Mediterranean.

good chart, imagine the ptb aiming the haarp weapon at the most fragile part of the fracture zone and letting earth do the rest ...

[marlowe]

Iran's Ahmadinejad orders launch of 5 nuclear reactors {April 9.2013}
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/45...mine-plant.htm

Iran has been celebrating Nuclear Technology Day on April 9 since 2006 {the last 8 years}

the 6.4 mag quake hits near the nuclear facility ,it's shallow,and it hits at 3:22 in the afternoon....and 322 is a Skull & Bones code number.......

[marlowe]

At the risk of being obnoxious I predicted the Fukushima mega quake eleven {11}

minutes before it happened....and being an intuitive I started the "Quake Watch Over Japan" 2 weeks before March 11,2011...

here is the thread I started in late February of 2011 & my quake prediction is post # 11....

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=159615

note :even people who hated my guts congratulated me...

i fixed the link it works now

[Davidallany]

I wouldn't doubt it if it indeed was engineered.

[Hervé]

marlowe,

Sarcasm, ridicule, ad hominem, etc... are no substitutes to factual data and evidence.

Hence, my question regarding this thread's title stands: what's the FACT?

PS: I am not interested in beliefs nor faith in this matter, just asking for the evidence.

[syrwong]

Conspiracy theorists never produce conclusive evidence, else it is not a conspiracy, or they will be dead. They offer a view supported by many usually weak evidence, and many unlikely coincidences. No, they can never prove TPTB guilty, but neither can TPTB prove they are innocent by remaining hidden and imitating nature.

This case is still a weak conspiracy theory. Do we really have the time of earthquake as stated? Can HAARP produce an effect accurate up to a minute? There is a good case for coincidences though.

[marlowe]

http://tinfoilpalace.eamped.com/2011...s-christian-h/

the mod on that forum lived in NZ and also contributed to it greatly....Engineered quakes are always shallow
{between 10 & 30 KMs...}...they often happen near the top of the hour.[/QUOTE]

Above is my research on HAARPed quakes in New Zealand starting with the first big one on Sept 4th,2010..

and following through to the killer quake on Feb,22,2011....and beyond..........

So this post is about my research on the HAARPed quakes near Christchurch in 2010/11......{mostly}