+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: BREAKING NEWS: NY Times - Bipartisan 'Indictment' for US 'WAR CRIMES' (Covered UP) by Boston Bombing..!

  1. Link to Post #1
    Australia Avalon Member jackovesk's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th April 2010
    Posts
    6,180
    Thanks
    12,102
    Thanked 35,601 times in 5,274 posts

    Default BREAKING NEWS: NY Times - Bipartisan 'Indictment' for US 'WAR CRIMES' (Covered UP) by Boston Bombing..!

    I (Urge) you to 'Watch/Listen' to this Powerful (Breaking News) in its (Entirety) from Dr. Steve Pieczenik on WHY? the (Boston Bombing) False Flag was used as a (Cover Up) for the recently published...

    Quote NY Times Article:

    Published: April 16, 2013

    Bipartisan Indictments for (War Crimes) on Clinton, George W. Bush, Barack H. Obama & (ALL) of their Minions...

    Indictment for War Crimes: FULL REPORT (pdf)

    ........................................



    U.S. Engaged in Torture After 9/11, Review Concludes

    By SCOTT SHANE

    Published: April 16, 2013

    WASHINGTON — A nonpartisan, independent review of interrogation and detention programs in the years after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks concludes that “it is (INDISPUTABLE) that the United States (ENGAGED) in the practice of (TORTURE)” and that the nation’s (HIGHEST OFFICIALS) bore ultimate responsibility for it.

    The sweeping, 577-page report says that while brutality has occurred in every American war, there never before had been “the kind of considered and detailed discussions that occurred after 9/11 directly involving a president and his top advisers on the wisdom, propriety and legality of inflicting pain and torment on some detainees in our custody.” The study, by an 11-member panel convened by the Constitution Project, a legal research and advocacy group, is to be released on Tuesday morning.

    Debate over the coercive interrogation methods used by the administration of President George W. Bush has often broken down on largely partisan lines. The Constitution Project’s task force on detainee treatment, led by two former members of Congress with experience in the executive branch — a Republican, Asa Hutchinson, and a Democrat, James R. Jones — seeks to produce a stronger national consensus on the torture question.

    While the task force did not have access to classified records, it is the most ambitious independent attempt to date to assess the detention and interrogation programs. A separate 6,000-page report on the Central Intelligence Agency’s record by the Senate Intelligence Committee, based exclusively on agency records, rather than interviews, remains classified.

    “As long as the debate continues, so too does the possibility that the United States could again engage in torture,” the report says.

    The use of torture, the report concludes, has “no justification” and “damaged the standing of our nation, reduced our capacity to convey moral censure when necessary and potentially increased the danger to U.S. military personnel taken captive.” The task force found “no firm or persuasive evidence” that these interrogation methods produced valuable information that could not have been obtained by other means. While “a person subjected to torture might well divulge useful information,” much of the information obtained by force was not reliable, the report says.

    Interrogation and abuse at the C.I.A.’s so-called black sites, the Guantánamo Bay prison in Cuba and war-zone detention centers, have been described in considerable detail by the news media and in declassified documents, though the Constitution Project report adds many new details.

    It confirms a report by Human Rights Watch that one or more Libyan militants were waterboarded by the C.I.A., challenging the agency’s longtime assertion that only three Al Qaeda prisoners were subjected to the near-drowning technique. It includes a detailed account by Albert J. Shimkus Jr., then a Navy captain who ran a hospital for detainees at the Guantánamo Bay prison, of his own disillusionment when he discovered what he considered to be the unethical mistreatment of prisoners.

    But the report’s main significance may be its attempt to assess what the United States government did in the years after 2001 and how it should be judged. The C.I.A. not only waterboarded prisoners, but slammed them into walls, chained them in uncomfortable positions for hours, stripped them of clothing and kept them awake for days on end.

    The question of whether those methods amounted to torture is a historically and legally momentous issue that has been debated for more than a decade inside and outside the government. The Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel wrote a series of legal opinions from 2002 to 2005 concluding that the methods were not torture if used under strict rules; all the memos were later withdrawn. News organizations have wrestled with whether to label the brutal methods unequivocally as torture in the face of some government officials’ claims that they were not.

    In addition, the United States is a signatory to the international Convention Against Torture, which requires the prompt investigation of allegations of torture and the compensation of its victims.

    Like the still-secret Senate interrogation report, the Constitution Project study was initiated after President Obama decided in 2009 not to support a national commission to investigate the post-9/11 counterterrorism programs, as proposed by Senator Patrick J. Leahy, Democrat of Vermont, and others. Mr. Obama said then that he wanted to “look forward, not backward.” Aides have said he feared that his own policy agenda might get sidetracked in a battle over his predecessor’s programs.

    The panel studied the treatment of prisoners at Guantánamo Bay, in Afghanistan and Iraq, and at the C.I.A’s secret prisons. Staff members, including the executive director, Neil A. Lewis, a former reporter for The New York Times, traveled to multiple detention sites and interviewed dozens of former American and foreign officials, as well as former detainees.

    Mr. Hutchinson, who served in the Bush administration as chief of the Drug Enforcement Administration and under secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, said he “took convincing” on the torture issue. But after the panel’s nearly two years of research, he said he had no doubts about what the United States did.

    “This has not been an easy inquiry for me, because I know many of the players,” Mr. Hutchinson said in an interview. He said he thought everyone involved in decisions, from Mr. Bush down, had acted in good faith, in a desperate effort to try to prevent more attacks.

    “But I just think we learn from history,” Mr. Hutchinson said. “It’s incredibly important to have an accurate account not just of what happened but of how decisions were made.”

    He added, “The United States has a historic and unique character, and part of that character is that we do not torture.”

    The panel found that the United States violated its international legal obligations by engineering “enforced disappearances” and secret detentions. It questions recidivism figures published by the Defense Intelligence Agency for Guantánamo detainees who have been released, saying they conflict with independent reviews.

    It describes in detail the ethical compromise of government lawyers who offered “acrobatic” advice to justify brutal interrogations and medical professionals who helped direct and monitor them. And it reveals an internal debate at the International Committee of the Red Cross over whether the organization should speak publicly about American abuses; advocates of going public lost the fight, delaying public exposure for months, the report finds.

    Mr. Jones, a former ambassador to Mexico, noted that his panel called for the release of a declassified version of the Senate report and said he believed that the two reports, one based on documents and the other largely on interviews, would complement each other in documenting what he called a grave series of policy errors.

    “I had not recognized the depths of torture in some cases,” Mr. Jones said. “We lost our compass.”

    While the Constitution Project report covers mainly the Bush years, it is critical of some Obama administration policies, especially what it calls excessive secrecy. It says that keeping the details of rendition and torture from the public “cannot continue to be justified on the basis of national security” and urges the administration to stop citing state secrets to block lawsuits by former detainees.

    The report calls for the revision of the Army Field Manual on interrogation to eliminate Appendix M, which it says would permit an interrogation for 40 consecutive hours, and to restore an explicit ban on stress positions and sleep manipulation.

    The core of the report, however, may be an appendix: a detailed 22-page legal and historical analysis that explains why the task force concluded that what the United States did was torture. It offers dozens of legal cases in which similar treatment was prosecuted in the United States or denounced as torture by American officials when used by other countries.

    The report compares the torture of detainees to the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II. “What was once generally taken to be understandable and justifiable behavior,” the report says, “can later become a case of historical regret.”

    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/16/wo...anted=all&_r=0

    PS - A (FALSE FLAG) for a (COVER-UP) just like Donald Rumsfeld's (Press-Statement) saying the Pentagon lost/could not account for ($2.5 Trillion USD) the (DAY BEFORE) 911...

    (BINGO)..!

    2.3 Trillion Dollars Missing from DOD Day before 911 2001



    What Can I Get For 2.3 Trillion?



    PSS - Are (YOU)...

    Starting to (GET IT) Now...?

    PSSS - Hopefully soon, we (all) may be able to get on with our lives...
    Last edited by jackovesk; 19th April 2013 at 08:25.

  2. The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to jackovesk For This Post:

    bennycog (19th April 2013), ceetee9 (24th April 2013), Cidersomerset (19th April 2013), etheric underground (19th April 2013), foreverfan (23rd April 2013), genevieve (19th April 2013), grannyfranny100 (21st April 2013), InTheBackground (27th April 2013), Lazlo (19th April 2013), Mercedes (19th April 2013), Referee (24th April 2013), RunningDeer (20th April 2013), Sabrina (19th April 2013), Wookie (21st April 2013)

  3. Link to Post #2
    United States Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    16th April 2012
    Location
    Could be Sirius
    Posts
    1,560
    Thanks
    5,081
    Thanked 8,827 times in 1,436 posts

    Default Re: BREAKING NEWS: NY Times - Bipartisan 'Indictment' for US 'WAR CRIMES' (Covered UP) by Boston Bombing..!

    There's all ready a thread started on this topic.....

    https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...before-bombing

  4. Link to Post #3
    Australia Avalon Member jackovesk's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th April 2010
    Posts
    6,180
    Thanks
    12,102
    Thanked 35,601 times in 5,274 posts

    Default Re: BREAKING NEWS: NY Times - Bipartisan 'Indictment' for US 'WAR CRIMES' (Covered UP) by Boston Bombing..!

    Quote Posted by we-R-one (here)
    There's all ready a thread started on this topic.....

    https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...before-bombing
    Apologies, I wasn't aware of that...

    Mods please 'Don't' merge

    IMHO - The more people that see it the better...

    Quote Posted by jackovesk (here)
    Dr. Steve Pieczenik: Reason For Boston False Flag

    Apr 18, 2013



    The Reason For The Timing Of The Boston False Flag; Bi-Patrisan-War Crime Actions of Bush, Obama, and Clinton Guilty of Crimes Against Humanity: Part 1:





    The Unintended Consequences of the Boston Massacre: THE SPECIFIC INDICTMENT of Bush Jr/Obama/CIA/US Military “Torture of 9/11 Prisoners” at GITMO—FINALLY CONFIRMED as a “WAR CRIME”— Equivalent to Prosecuted Nazi War Crimes and the Torture/ Internship Of Japanese Americans During WWII.

    Nothing beats a sensational front page news story like a Boston Marathon Massacre! Most readers would miss the incidental but far more serious implication for the moral compass of America than the NY Times story by Scott Shane, entitled, “U.S. Practiced Torture After 9/11, Non Partisan Review Concludes”. (posted earlier)

    In this article, both Asa Hutchinson[Republican/Bush Jr Administration] and James R. Jones [Democrat, Congress] indict the interrogation and tortures committed by Presidents Clinton [Rendition], Bush Jr [full menu of tortures], Obama .



    In essence, this bipartisan report, along with 6,000 pages of still classified docs IMPLICATES THREE ADMINISTRATIONS of INTERNATIONAL WAR CRIMES—RENDITION, TORTURE, ENHANCEDINTERROGATION.

    What does this mean in the midst of our frenzy to find ‘supposed terrorists’ of the Boston Marathon Massacre?

    It means that, as I have previously repeated time and time again, we have had and still have Presidents who have willingly committed acts of International War Crimes Punishable by Death and / or Life Imprisonment.

    Furthermore, to make matters even worse, the extensive investigations showed that the abominable, criminal activities of interrogation, torture, water boarding committed by the CIA, US military, US mercenaries and sanctioned by three presidents were like the wars themselves- totally useless.

    In short, the USA is GUILTY of COMMITTING USELESS WAR CRIMES!!!

    Have I, an experienced counter –terrorist expert with thirty years experience who had never had to touch even one detainee, let alone torture or ‘interrogate’ anyone, suddenly had a fit of righteous indignation or just decided to vent his RELENTLESS FURY for UNREPENTANT SINS of our THREE PRESIDENTS and their MINIONS?

    The answer lies not in the headlines nor in the hysterical media distractions of a tragic occurrence which I might have been able to predict (I think Patriarch did predict this), had I known beforehand that this report would come out on the same day as the BOSTON MARATHON.

    That’s right! You’ve got it! Once again, Obama in concert with FEMA, CIA, FBI, and other National Security minions—the usual ‘choir boy suspects’—decided to OFFER A DISTRACTION.

    Bloody! Macabre! Inane!! Insensitive!



    But please place this Boston Marathon along side the sacrifices that Bush jr was willing to make in terms of dead American bodies in 9/11—close to 3,000 innocent Americans in the World Trade Center alone. The Boston Marathon Massacre is small potatoes in the theater of distractions for war crimes.

    A decade ago, Bush Jr had no qualms, of course along with his close pal Cheney, of sacrificing a few thousand US military men in the useless Iraq War. Don’t forget the hundreds of thousands of innocent Pakistanis, Yemenis, Afghanis, and Iraqis that Obama, Panetta, Tenet, Hayden, Brennan et al, are willing to sacrifice in the name of ‘terror’ or, excuse me, the ‘war on terror’.

    So what’s a few Americans who were killed and injured in the Marathon Race? Nothing, really, in comparison to the full scope of the extent of the horror that Clinton, Bush jr and Obama collectively had engaged in maiming the innocent; torturing the prisoners; injuring and killing the countless thousands of innocent civilians; destroying societies and countries; and creating world wide MAYHEM and CHAOS—all for the sake of NATIONAL SECURITY??

    Let me be more precise and list some of the issues that are relevant to the ‘torture’, ‘interrogation’ and ‘the legal consequences’ of those actions over a thirty year period since the Clinton Administration.

    But first let’s go back, a bit further to WWII.

    —A Japanese General was summarily executed by the US allies for waterboarding pilots who had been caught in the Jimmy DoLittle Raid on Tokyo.

    — US Army soldiers during the Vietnam War summarily placed in prison for waterboarding Viet Cong prisoners of war.

    —In 1948, Norwegians executed German SS officers practicing ‘enhanced interrogation techniques’ called ‘Versharfte Vernehmung’ developed by Gestapo Chief Heinrich Muller, using ‘sleep deprivation’, ‘extreme cold’, ‘suspension in stress positions’ and ‘deliberate exhaustion’.

    —Navy Captain Albert Shimkus Jr, who ran a hospital for the prisoners at Gitmo protested the unethical behavior.

    — Bill Clinton, Sandy Berger approved rendition.

    —Bush jr, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Condi, Steve Hadley, Elliot Abrams, Gen. David Petraeus, Jose Rodriguez [head of CIA Covert operations], John Brennan, David Addington [WH staff], all approved the use of severe interrogation methods including hypothermia, waterboarding, stress positions, abdominal beatings, genital torture, and other bodily and psychological harm according to Department of Justice Concurrence of Attorney General John Ashcroft as written in the paper by John Yoo. Also concurring to these aforementioned methods were NSA Director General Michael Hayden, SecState Collin Powell, and DCI George Tenet .

    —The only official to dissent officially and was subsequently reprimanded was Philip Zelikow, PhD who wrote a memo contesting the DOJ’s Torture Memo written by John Yoo and others in “Justice”.

    — Karl Rove told BBC in 2010: ”I’m proud that we kept the world safer than it was, by the use of these techniques. They’re appropriate, they’re in conformity with our international requirements and with US law”.

    —Cheney: ” I was and remain a strong proponent of our enhanced interrogation program.”



    —Congresswoman, later Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi [D, Cal. San Francisco] in a meeting with the CIA/Bush Jr Administration—WHOLEHEARTEDLY SUPPORTED ENHANCED INTERROGATION AND TORTURE!

    I am told there are too many words so this is part 1… Otter Walks on Two Feet… 17/04/13

    http://planet.infowars.com/politics/...umanity-part-1

    PS - If you want to Download the (Alex Jones Show) MP3 here it is...

    Complete & Full (Analysis) of the Boston Bombing (False Flag)

    The PTW are in (PANIC) mode...

    The Alex Jones Show -- 2013 Apr 18 TH [1st 4 Hours]

    Quote From the Infowars web site :: On the Thursday, April 18 edition of The Alex Jones Show, Alex lays out the huge victory Infowars had yesterday in identifying several members of the Boston Marathon crowd that looked highly suspicious, even though a supposed arrest had already been made. Quite possibly, Infowars, with help from crowd sourced sites and a treasure trove of independent photos, may have held a huge part in destroying the official narrative the government intended to run with. We'll also examine the explosion at a West Texas fertilizer plant that killed as many as 15 people and injured more than 160.
    http://sebaygo1.blogspot.com.au/2013...-1st.html#more
    Last edited by jackovesk; 19th April 2013 at 07:34.

  5. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to jackovesk For This Post:

    bennycog (19th April 2013), grannyfranny100 (21st April 2013), Griff (20th April 2013), northstar (19th April 2013)

  6. Link to Post #4
    Avalon Member Lifebringer's Avatar
    Join Date
    18th December 2010
    Posts
    4,393
    Thanks
    6,808
    Thanked 11,796 times in 3,541 posts

    Default Re: BREAKING NEWS: NY Times - Bipartisan 'Indictment' for US 'WAR CRIMES' (Covered UP) by Boston Bombing..!

    Motive for the "Pearl Harbor" right Jack?
    WE got it, that plus owing the Asian Markets for sinking their economy until one of their puppets were put in place to bring the economy back online.
    They are really a bad kettle of worms, swirling in phychotic murder for cover of theft by deception, during the "money laundering" process. Too much skimming off the top on Wall Street and too many yachts, mansions, and drug stocks invested for "bad drugs" left them desperate for cover-up. Rumsfeld has the flu shots stocks.

    "A deep kettle of smelly fish" we have here.
    The rabbit hole just keeps going deeper, but soon we'll have their arzes nailed.
    What prosecutor wouldn't want to make a name for themselves? In the biggest "caper" since the moon landing.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Lifebringer For This Post:

    jackovesk (19th April 2013)

  8. Link to Post #5
    Australia Avalon Member jackovesk's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th April 2010
    Posts
    6,180
    Thanks
    12,102
    Thanked 35,601 times in 5,274 posts

    Default Re: BREAKING NEWS: NY Times - Bipartisan 'Indictment' for US 'WAR CRIMES' (Covered UP) by Boston Bombing..!

    Karl Rove 'Heckled' Throughout Speech In Massachusetts, Called Murderer, Terrorist..!

    Apr 10, 2013

    Quote Karl Rove ventured into hostile territory on Tuesday night, delivering a speech repeatedly interrupted by boisterous protesters at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

    According to CBS 3, the demonstrations raged both inside the auditorium and out, and Rove had barely begun speaking before people began standing up and shouting Rove down with accusations that his guidance of former President George W. Bush on the Iraq War had led to countless American and Iraqi casualties.

    Calls of "murderer" and "terrorist" rained down on Rove, while others held signs that read "war criminal." Rove faced a similar confrontation by opponents in 2010, when demonstrators actually forced Rove to abandon a book signing in California.

    Robert Rizzuto of The Republican reports that Rove lashed back at the protesters at least once on Tuesday, accusing them of being hypocritical with their criticism on Iraq, considering many Democrats voted for the invasion: "If you object to that, I want you to show up the next time Hillary Clinton comes here and tell her you disagree with her vote," Rove yelled back as he completely lost his temper on stage. "It's either that or you're saying those people were hoodwinked and that's an insult to those people including Harry Reid, Hillary Clinton, and others." Rove's speech wrapped up after about 30 minutes, and a question-and-answer session followed.

    According to WWLP, the UMass and Smith College young Republican clubs sponsored Rove's speech. The GOP strategist reduced his normal speaking fee from $25,000 to $15,000.



  9. Link to Post #6
    Australia Avalon Member jackovesk's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th April 2010
    Posts
    6,180
    Thanks
    12,102
    Thanked 35,601 times in 5,274 posts

    Default Re: BREAKING NEWS: NY Times - Bipartisan 'Indictment' for US 'WAR CRIMES' (Covered UP) by Boston Bombing..!



    Quote WAR CRIMES TRIALS:

    "But he started it!"...

    Only playable when NWO: World War Three
    is in play. Discard NWO: World War Three.
    The player who played that card must remove
    all action tokens from his Nations and expose
    the Plot cards in his hand.
    Last edited by jackovesk; 27th April 2013 at 08:48.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to jackovesk For This Post:

    eva08 (20th April 2013)

  11. Link to Post #7
    Australia Avalon Member jackovesk's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th April 2010
    Posts
    6,180
    Thanks
    12,102
    Thanked 35,601 times in 5,274 posts

    Default Re: BREAKING NEWS: NY Times - Bipartisan 'Indictment' for US 'WAR CRIMES' (Covered UP) by Boston Bombing..!



    American Civilian and Military Officials (AWAKEN)..!



    Thursday, April 18, 2013

    Thanks to the Following Legislators and Military Officials for doing the right thing!

    [1] Defeat of Gun Control Bill:

    -Sen. Charles Grassley [R-Iowa]: ”Which hardened criminal will subject himself to a ‘background check?” BRILLIANT AND WITTY AS USUAL !!!

    -Dean Heller [R-Nevada] overrode his colleague—Sen Harry Reid, The Mormon, Boxer who grew up in a whore house!! CONGRATS!!



    - Sen. Kelly Ayotte[R-NH]—Live Free or Die!!

    - Max Begich [D-Alaska]; Mark Pryor [D-Arkansas]; Heidi Heitkamp [ D-ND]; Max Baucus [D-Montana]--- BRAVE DEMOCRATS!!!

    --Sen Dianne Feinstein—[D-Calif.] continuously proposes restrictions on federal assault weapons since 1994. She was so moved by the recent ‘false flag’ Newtown, Conn. that she personally initiated another gun control legislation despite warnings from her own party leadership that she would lose.




    She receives CONGRATS for ARROGANCE, CORRUPTION AND PREVARICATION ---a legislator who voted for the Iraq War, knowing fully well that it was a lie. In addition, she wholeheartedly supported the Patriot Act—suppression of American basic freedoms in the non–existent world of the ‘war on terror’. She receives condemnation for having supported in full force the ‘torture ‘ and ‘interrogation’ illegal activities of the CIA, DOD, US mercenaries, and other legislation which curtailed our liberties to criticize any generals, including General Betrayus.

    She is being highly recommended for “legislative disposal” [GET RID OF HER ASAP!] as well as potential indictment for collusion on war crimes regarding the illegal wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Sudan, Syria, Pakistan, et al.

    [2] US Military Reversal of Support for “Unknown” Free Syrian Army:

    In a recent courageous reversal by JCS General Martin Dempsey, he admitted that the US could no longer be sure that they could clearly identify the right group to equip within the ranks of the opposition to Assad.

    This statement came as a welcome surprise to me and others because Gen Dempsey had been a strong proponent of DCI Gen David Petraeus claim that they, the CIA, had ‘vetted’ the Syrian opposition forces. Once again, we discover that Gen Petraeus had lied to the American people.




    But more importantly, Demsey’s remarks are in stark contradiction to the politico SecState ‘justa-gigolo’ John Kerry who blatantly LIED in the same hearing that the State Department and the WH held. SecState Kerry: “There is a very clear ability now in the Syrian opposition to make certain that what goes to the moderate, legitimate opposition is, in fact, getting to them.”

    Guess which one is lying?

    I’ll give some hints.

    First, one of these Vietnam combat veterans brought a camera crew into the war to show his Massachusetts constituents how well he was fighting.

    Second, this same person ran against his secret brother in the Yale Skull and Bones Society while Bush Jr was the Republican candidate for President.

    Thirdly, this man never worked an honest day in his life other than being on the Federal payroll as a legislator.

    You got it!! John Kerry, the ‘so-called’ Vietnam War Hero who ‘threw away’ his medal of honor in defiance of the Vietnam War was and is a CONSUMMATE LIAR—PERSONALLY AND PROFESSIONALLY.

    But, he certainly deserves the accolade of being AMERICA’S PREMIER GIGOLO!! CONGRATS on marry wealth, not once, but twice!!! No mean feat for a French Speaking legislative laggard and CIA asset, just like his father, whom he claimed was in the State Dept. NOT!!!

    There it is, a quick wrap up of a few Americans who were willing to stand up for their personal and professional convictions (and a couple who continue to lie) in order to insure that our Emperor Obamus does not destroy this country while he self –destructs himself.

    Shame on you OBAMA for having to create all those “false flags” and “lies” in order to promote your un-American agenda. But it has been reported that Obama is “enraged” and “reclusive”….you should be, even your ex supporters are on to you.



    PERHAPS, EMPEROR OBAMUS YOU SHOULD SHED A TEAR FOR YOURSELF AND NOT… WE Americans…. who could easily do without you or any Federal official who claims to protect us against ‘ourselves’ and ‘fictitious terrorists’.

    Tyranny has a way of self-destructing. You are on your way, OBAMUS! And there is nothing that you nor your minions can do to stop the tide, everytime you falseflag, more people are on it!


    Posted by Steve Pieczenik at 10:35 PM

    https://stevepieczenik.com/talks/blog.html

    ...........................

    Quote ***WARNING***GRAPHIC CONTENT***
    DOWNLOAD THE FULL REPORT HERE:
    https://stevepieczenik.com/docs/cons...-treatment.pdf

    On Tuesday, the Constitution Project, a Washington, DC think tank, released a 577-page report by its “Task Force on Detainee Treatment” documenting WAR CRIMES committed by Clinton, Bush and OBAMA including unthinkable atrocities punishable by life in prison or death.

    ***DO NOT BE DISTRACTED***
    -SHARE THIS MESSAGE-
    -TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION-
    -IT IS YOUR DUTY-
    Posted by Steve Pieczenik at 1:10 AM
    Last edited by jackovesk; 21st April 2013 at 05:09.

  12. Link to Post #8
    Australia Avalon Member jackovesk's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th April 2010
    Posts
    6,180
    Thanks
    12,102
    Thanked 35,601 times in 5,274 posts

    Default Re: BREAKING NEWS: NY Times - Bipartisan 'Indictment' for US 'WAR CRIMES' (Covered UP) by Boston Bombing..!



    Saturday, April 20, 2013

    Quote a post from a reader in Utah, see the headline after the "minutes"...
    http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/politic...orces.html.csp


    Posted by Steve Pieczenik at 4:35 PM




    I am asking the readers to start questioning and posting the scheduling of these "drills" happening all over the country...document on your own blogs, FB, twitter etc....why are we having these expensive "emergency preparedness drills"? How much are they costing us taxpayers? Where are the municipal and state authorities? Why are we spending money on military vehicles, ammunition, high tech surveillance, crowd control? Why aren't we building roads, fixing bridges, repairing schools, building high tech factories? Follow the money trail, who is getting paid for these drills for the FAKED WAR on terror? Who is getting the fat jobs, the lucrative contracts? Who has been compromised? Follow the money and you will find the source....build cars, computers not police state equipment! Learn to fight back.

    These pictures are from Boston not Beirut!


    Posted by Steve Pieczenik at 11:00 AM

    https://stevepieczenik.com/talks/blog.html
    Last edited by jackovesk; 21st April 2013 at 05:18.

  13. Link to Post #9
    Australia Avalon Member jackovesk's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th April 2010
    Posts
    6,180
    Thanks
    12,102
    Thanked 35,601 times in 5,274 posts

    Default Re: BREAKING NEWS: NY Times - Bipartisan 'Indictment' for US 'WAR CRIMES' (Covered UP) by Boston Bombing..!





    Monday, April 22, 2013

    Net Assessment of USG Capacity to Handle Domestic Terrorism –BOSTON MARATHON ATTACK: Major Disaster for POTUS; WH National Sec Staff; FBI; Mueller; Eric Holder; CIA; Boston Police Force; Governor Deval Patrick.

    The horrendous handling of the Boston Marathon bombing proved once again that an ACT OF TERRORISM is 96% successful in creating its initial intention—FEAR. But in this particular case---a so-called act of ‘terrorism’ created the ABSOLUTE DREAM of ANY WORLD WIDE TERRORIST---COMPLETE PARALYSIS and LOCKDOWN OF BOSTON AND it’s ENVIRONS!!

    The Boston Bombing paralysed a metro area of 4 million through fear alone and the subsequent inept handling of the siege.



    In crisis management, there are three basic principles which the founding fathers of Counter Terrorism and Hostage Negotiation initiated and taught over thirty years of experience:

    [1] Control –Media, Violence, and Complexity of Situation.

    [2] Minimize the Theater of Fear and Terrorism—this is the most inviolate principle which differentiates the amateur from the professional crisis manager. The press is borne and embedded as part and parcel of the theater of terrorism.

    The more media coverage, the greater the impact of the fear.

    The reporters become the RESONATORS and AMPLIFIERS of the fear factor. The job of the professional is to eliminate that factor by not reporting events or ‘managing’ the media coverage.

    In my experience, I literally cut off the access of the networks to the perpetrators. Even in the age of the internet it is even easier to control the ‘official’ media coverage through silence and ‘no responses’. But once the media is asked to help in the apprehension of the perpetrator, the crisis is now controlled by the terrorists.



    The FBI’s decision to release the pictures of the perpetrators and requesting the public to help in the apprehension of the two brothers may have been good police work but it was terrible counter-terrorist crisis management.

    I have run crises with 500 Hostages in three buildings in Washington DC with several already dead, my one and only job was to free the hostages, minimize the impact the fear of the terrorism in Washington DC and protect the office of the presidency.

    [3] NEVER ESCALATE the CRISIS to the level where the POTUS is involved in either decision making or the appearance of decision making.



    The reason is simple.

    If the POTUS gets involved as OBAMA invariably did and Jimmy Carter had wanted to do , it places the OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENCY and THEREFORE the SYMBOL of the USG as a HOSTAGE to the ACT OF TERRORISM.

    This is a no-no!

    It was the professional obligation of the FBI crisis manager and especially his boss, MUELLER, not to involve POTUS or the WH in any of the decision making process.

    But as usual, the FBI failed.

    The FBI should have insisted on a gag order on any and all participants to minimize the fear factor but once again, they did the opposite….

    So who won in this CRISIS of “TERRORISM”?

    The terrorists made Boston look like the catastrophes that our own military has created in Iraq, Pakistan, Libya, Jordan, Syria, Egypt, Yemen and Somalia.

    This terrorist action brought home the atrocities that we americans don’t see when we illegally invaded and destroyed muslim countries like Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, Libya, Egypt, and Syria.

    So what are the lessons that we American citizens have to learn from this tragedy?

    [1] We should demand from our legislators an independent investigation of the FBI handling of the crisis. What went wrong??



    [2] Mueller, the Director of the FBI, should be investigated for incompetence, starting with a history antedating the FALSE FLAG 9/11 Attack. Seems our legislators are afraid of him, as they were of J Edgar Hoover, so it will depend on the American public to insist on exposing Mueller’s actions during the 9/11 cover up and now his mishandling of Boston.

    [3] The Boston Police Dept should also be investigated for the way they handled the entire situation. It’s standard procedure. Where did they make mistakes and where did they succeed.

    [4] The WH National Security Staff –filled with novitiates—should be seriously cross examined for their incompetency and lack of demonstrated experience in Crisis Management.

    In particular, Lisa Monaco, rumored to be the next head of the FBI. Who is she? What are her qualifications for counter terrorism other than political cronyism?

    Denis McDonough –has proven to be one of the WORST CHIEFS of STAFF in the past thirty years. As far as I know, he was basically a speech writer who wandered into areas in which he was completely incompetent to run, like foreign policy or domestic crises.

    It is the prerogative of Obama to choose any one he wants, but clearly his inexperience in both domestic and foreign policy has become so blatant. Crises after mis-handled crises….real or not, it ain’t leadership, folks! Osama bin Laden “faked” killing, the real death of our ambassador in Benghazi, the false flag of Sandy Hook, Arab winter, sanctioned torture and now this mess in Boston- this is what Obama hath wrought. With leadership like this, who needs it??

    But where is our favorite group in all this mess in Boston? Constantly Incompetent Agency worked with these two brothers and the Chechen terrorists.



    The Russian FSB asked our FBI about one of the brothers and his activities in Chechnya with the so-called islamist terrorists. The FSB knew what many of us in the Intelligence world knew, that the CIA has been creating strategic tensions around the countries called the CIS- all those in central Asia which separated from the Soviet Union in the 1990s.

    Let’s ask our CIA for a briefing on how the Chechen family received political asylum in the early 2000s ?? then why the parents returned back to Russia leaving their wealthy sons to live in Cambridge Mass? I don’t see a conspiracy, I see a FUBAR by our USG both domestically and in Foreign Policy!

    One of my readers maintains that we just need 3% to start seriously questioning and demanding answers:

    Why are we at war?

    Why do we commit and sanction torture?

    Why are we spending money on police/military equipment when our schools and roads are deteriorating?

    Why are we shipping 10 billion dollars worth of military equipment to Israel and the UAE?

    What is this Homeland Security monster that is sucking all of our taxpayer money?

    Keep at it, they are messing up like crazy.



    Posted by Steve Pieczenik at 9:33 PM

    https://stevepieczenik.com/talks/blog.html

    PS - For those who may not of known what (POTUS) meant...

    Quote POTUS is "President of the United States"
    Last edited by jackovesk; 23rd April 2013 at 14:03.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to jackovesk For This Post:

    Lettherebelight (6th May 2013)

  15. Link to Post #10
    Australia Avalon Member jackovesk's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th April 2010
    Posts
    6,180
    Thanks
    12,102
    Thanked 35,601 times in 5,274 posts

    Default Re: BREAKING NEWS: NY Times - Bipartisan 'Indictment' for US 'WAR CRIMES' (Covered UP) by Boston Bombing..!



    Tuesday, April 23, 2013

    Quote Alex Jones' interview with Wayne Madsen (just in case you didn't hear it, thx Patriarch), helps fill in the blanks on the Boston situation.

    Posted by Steve Pieczenik at 7:28 AM

    https://stevepieczenik.com/talks/blog.html
    The World of Synthetic Manufactured Terrorism


  16. The Following User Says Thank You to jackovesk For This Post:

    Lettherebelight (6th May 2013)

  17. Link to Post #11
    Australia Avalon Member jackovesk's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th April 2010
    Posts
    6,180
    Thanks
    12,102
    Thanked 35,601 times in 5,274 posts

    Default Re: BREAKING NEWS: NY Times - Bipartisan 'Indictment' for US 'WAR CRIMES' (Covered UP) by Boston Bombing..!



    Tuesday, April 23, 2013





    Robert Swan Mueller III: Sixth and Current Director of the FBI- Please Answer the Following Questions for the American Public:

    [1] Did you know or participate in any way in the recent Boston Bombing?



    [2] Could you explain your relationship with Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick, a former Legal Associate of yours at the once prestigious law firm Hill and Barlow?

    [3] Could you explain to the American public how you specifically were asked to work in the office of the U.S Attorney’s Office of the District of Massachusetts as Assistant United States Attorney investigating and prosecuting financial fraud; TERRORISM –which cases and how did you prosecute them--; as well as Public Corruption; Narcotics conspiracies; and International Money Launderers?

    [4] Is there any correlation between the fact that you served as a public servant of Massachusetts, and in private practice in two PRESTIGIOUS BOSTON –yes, Boston appears again and again on your resume—Both Private Law firms: Hill and Barlow as well as Hale and Dorr –and the fact that there happened to be “A Terrorist Bombing In Boston”? Sir, is that simply coincidence? Or is there some connection? If so, please explain what that connection might be?

    [5] During the time you had attended Princeton University did you join or were you solicited to join a Secret Society? And if so, which one did you join? And if you did not join, why not?

    [6] At either Princeton University where you received your BA in 1966; or New York University where in 1967 you received your M.A in International Relations; or in 1973 at the University of Virginia where you received your JD; did you ever join or were you ever solicited by any U.S. civilian or military intelligence organization, specifically the CIA or Military Intelligence, to join, participate or interact with them in any form?

    If so, please explain your relationship with both the USG Civilian and Military Intel organizations prior to your becoming FBI Director.

    When and if you were solicited, by whom and what to join or represent a USG covert organization? And for how long?

    Were you in any way working with the CIA in the Boston Bombing? Or with any Chechens prior to the Boston Bombing? If so, when and where? And for how long? And for what purpose?



    [7] When you acted as lead prosecutor against Panamanian General Manuel Noriega, what LEGAL AUTHORITY DID YOU HAVE WITH REGARDS TO A GENERAL OF PANAMANIAN BIRTH AND RESIDENCE?

    Please answer my question with regards to General Manuel Noriega, because I was intimately involved in the attempts to ‘Get Him out of Panama’. But as a US OPERATIVE DURING THE REAGAN administration, no one was sure what LEGAL AUTHORITY we, the USG, had with respect to possible CRIMES COMMITTED by a PANAMANIAN GENERAL against a PANAMANIAN CITIZEN…..

    [8] Who specifically asked you to prosecute General Antonio Noriega in Vice President Bush Sr ‘s office?

    Was it his national security advisor Don Gregg?

    Was it your FORMER LAW COLLEAGUE at HALE and DORR—C.BOYDEN GRAY—Legal Counsel to VP Bush Sr?

    And if so, what grounds did Mr Gray or any other person in the office of the Vice President give you considering that General Antonio Noriega had told me PERSONALLY that he had worked for BUSH SR in INTELLIGENCE and DRUGS?

    Can you explain any possible legal conflict that you might have regarding this case and your subsequent appointment as Director of the FBI when two other very qualified candidates SPONTANEOUSLY DROPPED out of the RUNNING for FBI DIRECTOR?

    Was your appointment as FBI Director on July 5, 2001 for George Bush Jr in any way tied or related to your work for VP, then President BUSH SR?

    If so, please explain!
    Remember you are under the oath of office and the requirements of the office to not perjure YOURSELF IN ANY WAY. And you cannot take the fifth!

    [9] Were you or any of your representatives of the FBI involved in anyway in the 9/11 FALSE FLAG EPISODE or the ATTACK ON THE TWIN TOWERS?

    Remember ---if you lie, that means PERJURY—and that is a long sentence for a FEDERAL OFFICIAL!! As you KNOW ALL TOO WELL!!

    [10] Were you in any way as FBI Director involved in the final ‘assassination’ of Osama bin Laden during President Obama’s tenure?



    If so, how were you and/or your representatives in the FBI involved in the Osama Bin Laden raid and ‘Assassination’?

    I think by now, Mr Mueller, who received the Bronze Star, two Navy Commendation Medals, the Purple Heart and the Vietnamese Cross of Gallantry ---understand that you, a VIETNAM WAR HERO, MAY HAVE TURNED YOUR LOYALTIES AWAY from SERVING OUR COUNTRY to serving our PRESIDENTS WHO HAVE HARMED OUR COUNTRY!

    What would you say to a war hero who had POSSIBLY COMMITTED TREASON AGAINST HIS OWN FELLOW CITIZENS?

    Is that what they taught you at St. Paul’s School?

    I think not, Mr Mueller!
    I will quote to you what one of your most famous legal colleagues, Joseph Welch, uttered to Senator Joseph McCarthy:

    “SIR, HAVE YOU NO SHAME OR DECENCY? ”

    I close my case, Mr Mueller. And now, as an ex-hostage negotiator and psychological warfare operative--- I leave you with your conscience and ask you again—Will you RESIGN? For the benefit of the country that both you and I fought for?

    When you ponder this question, I would like you to remember those fine words of inspiration and truth that were taught to you at both St Paul’s School and Princeton—

    “Let us learn those things on earth, the knowledge of which continues in heaven!”



    Posted by Steve Pieczenik at 9:56 PM

    https://stevepieczenik.com/talks/blog.html

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to jackovesk For This Post:

    Lettherebelight (6th May 2013)

  19. Link to Post #12
    Australia Avalon Member jackovesk's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th April 2010
    Posts
    6,180
    Thanks
    12,102
    Thanked 35,601 times in 5,274 posts

    Default Re: BREAKING NEWS: NY Times - Bipartisan 'Indictment' for US 'WAR CRIMES' (Covered UP) by Boston Bombing..!

    Thanks to (ALL) our (GUESTS) who have (Read, Watched, Listened & LEARNED) from this 'Thread'...

    I will continue to update Dr Steve Pieczenik's (Intel) on a regular basis...
    Last edited by jackovesk; 27th April 2013 at 09:00.

  20. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to jackovesk For This Post:

    Lettherebelight (6th May 2013), penn (27th April 2013), Wookie (26th April 2013)

  21. Link to Post #13
    Australia Avalon Member jackovesk's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th April 2010
    Posts
    6,180
    Thanks
    12,102
    Thanked 35,601 times in 5,274 posts

    Default Re: BREAKING NEWS: NY Times - Bipartisan 'Indictment' for US 'WAR CRIMES' (Covered UP) by Boston Bombing..!



    Quote Friday, April 26, 2013

    The "lost" history channel episode on the JFK assassination, you'll need 45 minutes, its worth it
    http://www.personalgrowthcourses.net...assassinations
    Thanks policy critic.

    Posted by Steve Pieczenik at 8:56 PM

    https://stevepieczenik.com/talks/blog.html
    The Men Who (KILLED) Kennedy

    Banned History Channel video shows (GOVERNMENT) involved in Kennedy assassination

    PS - The Most Revealing (WINK) Of The 20th Century



    The (WINK)...



    Quote Congressman Albert Thomas winks back at a quickly-smiling LBJ as he is being sworn in to be the next President of the United States on Air Force One while the grief-stricken Jackie Kennedy stands next to him.
    http://www.personalgrowthcourses.net...assassinations
    Last edited by jackovesk; 27th April 2013 at 08:55.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts