+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 1 5
Results 81 to 86 of 86

Thread: Possible Boston Marathon Bombing Cover-Up Scenario

  1. Link to Post #81
    United States Administrator ThePythonicCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Language
    English
    Age
    78
    Posts
    30,330
    Thanks
    36,470
    Thanked 152,354 times in 23,250 posts

    Default Re: Possible Boston Marathon Bombing Cover-Up Scenario

    I split off some 25 posts from this thread and one other thread into a new and separate thread: Explosions at Boston marathon - split thread, as explained in the Mod-edit note that I just added before the first post of that new split thread.
    My quite dormant website: pauljackson.us

  2. Link to Post #82
    United States Administrator ThePythonicCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Language
    English
    Age
    78
    Posts
    30,330
    Thanks
    36,470
    Thanked 152,354 times in 23,250 posts

    Default Re: Possible Boston Marathon Bombing Cover-Up Scenario

    Quote Posted by Operator (here)
    If the 19 year old dies this case will be attempted to be closed in a wink of an eye.
    They might try to pull a "Bin Laden" on him, and keep him "virtually" alive for a few more years past his actual death, as a convenient source of news stories.
    My quite dormant website: pauljackson.us

  3. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ThePythonicCow For This Post:

    Earth Angel (22nd April 2013), Operator (22nd April 2013), Selene (22nd April 2013)

  4. Link to Post #83
    Ecuador Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    3rd February 2011
    Location
    California
    Age
    38
    Posts
    1,584
    Thanks
    3,721
    Thanked 10,195 times in 1,429 posts

    Default Re: Possible Boston Marathon Bombing Cover-Up Scenario

    Since the new information about the CST crew has come to light, I have done some more research. Using logic and reason, this new evidence sheds light on what was most likely in the backpacks.

    This assumption or premise is based on the available information as opposed to assumptions based on lack of information. I no longer suspect that it was bomb technicians equipment, but bomb detection equipment. This is a more reasonable alternative as you will see below.

    These men with the backpacks were part of a WMD CST crew on stand-by for the event.

    You can read about these kinds of crews here:



    The backpacks were most likely (based on this new evidence) radiation detection equipment. This type of equipment is custom made for backpacks. Specifically, to be convenient, portable, and clandestine.







    Thermo Scientific offers their own version of such a pack. Here's a description from their site:
    Thermo Scientific PackEye radiation detection backpack locates and detects gamma-emitting radioactive sources in large areas very rapidly, but unobtrusively.
    Provides survey teams with a tool for effectively addressing the problems of orphaned sources, radiological contamination, and maliciously introduced sources.

    [Some bullet points from the details section]
    • Unchallenged light weight of 6kg
    • Can be tied into the ViewPoint Enterprise platform, allowing for a customizable remote monitoring solution which will provide real-time command and control data
    • Acoustic or LED bar indicator alarm; can provide a stealth mode using standard ear-phone
    • Earphone socket
    • Optional single earphone
    • NBR detector
    • RadEye Personal Radiation Detector (PRD)
    • Standard earphone can be used
    Source: http://www.thermoscientific.com/ecom...specifications

    Here is another description of these types of backpacks.
    Radiation detection backpacks are units designed for executing covert searches for gamma-emitting (and in some cases neutron-emitting) radioactive materials. The unit’s detector and associated electronics are hidden inside a backpack, allowing the operator to inconspicuously search public areas. Emergency responders can use these backpacks to locate and secure radioactive materials that were placed in a public or private area.

    Source: https://www.rkb.us/SAVER/SaverDocs.c...ontent_id=2098
    Now all the pictures of the vehicles with all the equipment makes sense. Now the backpacks make sense. Now the handheld radiation detectors/display units make sense. Now, it makes sense that the men missed the bomb.

    Many people had backpacks, but these CST personnel were relying on their equipment to sniff out any radiation emanating from a bomb. The type of bomb used couldn't have been detected by their equipment.

    Now go back and read the opening post.

    I'm not trying to be right. I'm not trying to win an argument. I'm defending reason. Not my reason. Reason. I've said it before, you all have been too quick to jump to a conclusion or accept evidence without digging into it.

    I have other evidence debunking a lot of other crap being pushed around here. You can find it too, but you don't want to. I'm not going to waste my time thinking for you, having to lay it out. Your being lazy. Period.
    Last edited by Jeffrey; 22nd April 2013 at 18:55.

  5. Link to Post #84
    Morocco Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    23rd January 2011
    Location
    Ignoring Your Outrage
    Language
    Discordian
    Posts
    4,888
    Thanks
    29,096
    Thanked 40,082 times in 4,764 posts

    Default Re: Possible Boston Marathon Bombing Cover-Up Scenario

    *slinking back into the shadows*
    Last edited by PurpleLama; 22nd April 2013 at 22:45.

  6. Link to Post #85
    Canada Avalon Member
    Join Date
    16th October 2011
    Posts
    1,133
    Thanks
    14,190
    Thanked 4,770 times in 989 posts

    Default Re: Possible Boston Marathon Bombing Cover-Up Scenario

    Vivek please watch the ice cream!

    https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post665020

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to CdnSirian For This Post:

    soleil (23rd April 2013)

  8. Link to Post #86
    Ecuador Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    3rd February 2011
    Location
    California
    Age
    38
    Posts
    1,584
    Thanks
    3,721
    Thanked 10,195 times in 1,429 posts

    Default Re: Possible Boston Marathon Bombing Cover-Up Scenario

    Excerpts from the PDF, US Department of Justice: Planning and Managing Security For Major Special Events:
    Placement of assessment teams inside the venue has become standard procedure for major special events managed by federal agencies. Joint Hazardous Materials Assessment Teams (JHAT) and Joint Hazardous Explosive Response Teams (JHERT) have been developed for response to reported hazmat and explosive threats or incident in and around the venues. The JHATs and JHERTs consist of experienced personnel from different disciplines and levels of government, co-located in a single discreet response vehicle, ATV, or in a walking unit. The JHATs and JHERTs provide the incident commander a low-profile team that can unobtrusively assess the need for further specialized assets, allowing those valuable assets to remain available for actual incidents. Depending on the need for high level security at the event, a Bomb Management Center (BMC) may be part of the assessment team process. The BMC oversees the response of all explosive-related assets to include the coordinated response of the JHERT.

    […]

    The local agency providing primary hazmat response in the community, typically the fire department, fills a position in the JHAT, and the last position in the JHAT may be either state/local law enforcement hazmat, or state national guard civil support team personnel. The JHAT also carries a basic detection and monitoring capability.

    Source: https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=h...df&chrome=true
    So, it's not unusual to have those men there. In light of the above information, the suspicion cast upon the warranting of such a crew at this event is no longer conspiracy worthy. It's standard protocol to have them there. Also, the fact that JHATs operate as a "low-profile team" to make "unobtrusive" assessments with "basic detection and monitoring capability" further supports the evidence that the backpacks were bomb detection equipment.

    The only thing left unanswered is about the suspects, suspicion about the FBI fostering terrorist plots, and this Saudi National. Which, to be honest, Glenn Beck's sources may be feeding him disinformation in attempts to smear his credibility.

    Somebody "up top" may have known this would've/could've happened, but it won't be proved by the presence of the CST.

    The gov't won't let this crisis go to waste and rumors/news of fresh legislation are already emerging in the wake of this event.
    Last edited by Jeffrey; 23rd April 2013 at 17:34.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 1 5

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts