Page 1 of 4 1 4 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 62

Thread: Jiminii's Viewpoint on LRH's Philosophy (In easily understood language)

  1. Link to Post #1
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    11th May 2013
    Location
    asia
    Age
    80
    Posts
    2,065
    Thanks
    1,980
    Thanked 10,011 times in 1,932 posts

    Default Jiminii's Viewpoint on LRH's Philosophy (In easily understood language)

    1. prison planet
    There is no way they can kill a spirit being. We have gone back in time so far that the number would fill an 8 1/2 page on the second Wall of Fire and we still have not found the origin of a spirit ... so apparently we have always been here,

    No it take an awful lot of force to knock out a spirit being and then make him lose his memory ... a spirit being could probably brush his teeth with a 100 billion watt lightning bolt ... so we are talking about a lot of force to trap a spirit..

    why would they do it? why would they go to such an expense to trap spirit beings ..in human bodies on prison planets like this one we are on?

    the nearest star from here is about 10 light years from here ,
    that is light traveling at 186,000 miles a second for 10 years ...
    now a spirit can be there almost the same time he thinks it.

    how fast would a spirit being have to operate to create atoms .. build planets and stars ... how fast does an atom travel ??? we are talking about electrons moving from one atom to another .. electricity ... not how fast one rotates around a nucleus proton ... and then multiply it by the size of this universe ...

    how fast would a spirit have to operate to keep this entire universe in motion continually creating itself ... ????

    How much garbage would you have to put into a spirit being to slow him down to the size of a body (as from the size of the universe), on a planet on the edge of a galaxy believing he/she/it was just an animal???

    that is how much garbage you have to remove to be free ...

    the future is yours ... believe me ... IT REALLY IS YOURS AND YOUR DECISION ON WHERE IT WILL GO FROM HERE.

    now you in this human body might think, "oh this is impossible ... look at what we are up against ... the entire cabal/elite and all these aliens and their tech and all of these news the economics ... the works ... impossible indeed"

    in the last 4 years have you seen any of their predictions coming true?

    who do you think is stopping this ..???. (whether you are aware of it or not)
    who do you think is controlling this ...????

    we are almost there .... really ... you only get bigger as you can confront all of it ... "that what you can confront you can handle" ...

    what does that mean? .. "that what you can confront you can handle"

    does it mean you have to go do something or just confront it???

    you really don't know how powerful your thoughts are ....

    this is my story from beginning to now ...

    may the adventure begin

    jim

  2. The Following 24 Users Say Thank You to jiminii For This Post:

    Aurelius (15th June 2013), CD7 (15th June 2013), Chester (15th June 2013), dan33 (27th April 2018), Dorjezigzag (15th June 2013), Ernie Nemeth (5th September 2013), Hazel (15th June 2013), InCiDeR (16th June 2013), johnf (15th June 2013), Katyani (15th June 2013), Kraut (15th June 2013), Laura Elina (15th June 2013), Limor Wolf (16th June 2013), Mike (15th June 2013), naste.de.lumina (15th June 2013), northstar (15th June 2013), Orph (15th June 2013), rezboom (16th June 2013), skamandar (15th June 2013), soleil (19th June 2013), Sumo Sun (22nd June 2013), Swan (15th June 2013), Swanette (20th June 2013), we-R-one (15th June 2013)

  3. Link to Post #2
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    11th May 2013
    Location
    asia
    Age
    80
    Posts
    2,065
    Thanks
    1,980
    Thanked 10,011 times in 1,932 posts

    Default Re: Jiminii's Viewpoint on LRH's Philosophy (In easily understood language)

    Ok so we start with what we are ... so we need some definitions for this

    tone scale is an arbitrary number of the emotions of a spirit from minus 40 to plus 40

    click on the pictures to make them larger
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	tonea.jpg
Views:	574
Size:	152.0 KB
ID:	21774   Click image for larger version

Name:	toneb.jpg
Views:	386
Size:	126.2 KB
ID:	21775  
    Last edited by jiminii; 15th June 2013 at 17:43.

  4. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to jiminii For This Post:

    johnf (15th June 2013), naste.de.lumina (15th June 2013), soleil (19th June 2013), Swanette (20th June 2013), we-R-one (15th June 2013)

  5. Link to Post #3
    Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    21st May 2012
    Location
    Scandinavia
    Age
    57
    Posts
    387
    Thanks
    3,792
    Thanked 2,452 times in 356 posts

    Default Re: Jiminii's Viewpoint on LRH's Philosophy (In easily understood language)

    Hi Jim,

    Could you possibly make the above image larger?

    EDIT: Thanks
    Last edited by Swan; 15th June 2013 at 18:57.

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Swan For This Post:

    johnf (15th June 2013), we-R-one (15th June 2013)

  7. Link to Post #4
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    11th May 2013
    Location
    asia
    Age
    80
    Posts
    2,065
    Thanks
    1,980
    Thanked 10,011 times in 1,932 posts

    Default Re: Jiminii's Viewpoint on LRH's Philosophy (In easily understood language)

    THETA, 1. theta is thought, life force, elan vital, the spirit, the soul, or any other of the numerous definitions it has had for some thousands of years.
    2 . the life force, life energy, divine energy, elan vital, or by any other name, the energy peculiar to life which acts upon material in the physical universe and animates it, mobilizes it and changes it. It is susceptible to alteration in character or vibration, at which time it becomes enturbulated theta or entheta.
    3. theta is thought; an energy of its own universe analogous to energy in
    the physical universe but only occasionally paralleling electromagnetic-gravitic laws. The three primary components of theta are affinity, reality, and communication.
    4 . reason, serenity, stability, happiness, cheerful emotion, persistence, and the other factors which man ordinarily considers desirable.
    5 . an energy existing separate and distinct from the physical universe.
    6 . Greek for thought or life or the spirit.
    7 . not a nothingness. It just happens to be an exterior thing to this universe—so you couldn't talk about it in this universe’s terms.

    THETA BEING, 1. the “I,” it is who the person himself is.
    2. the theta being is close to a perpetual motion picture machine in that it can create energy and impulses. It thinks without facsimiles, it can act without experience, it can know simply by being.

    THETA BODY, a thetan very often carries with him a theta body which he
    mocked up on the past track and which is a number of facsimiles of old bodies he has misowned and is carrying along with him as control mechanisms which he uses to control the body he is using.

    THETAN, 1. the living unit we call, in Scientology, a thetan, that being taken from the Greek letter theta, the mathematical symbol used to indicate the source of life and life itself.
    2 . the awareness of awareness unit which has all potentialities but no mass, no wave-length and no location.
    3 .the being who is the individual and who handles and lives in the body.
    4 . (spirit) is described in Scientology as having no mass, no wave-length, no energy and no time or location in space except by consideration or postulate. The spirit is not a thing. It is the creator of things.
    5 . the personality and beingness which actually is the individual and is aware of being aware and is ordinarily and normally the “person” and who the individual thinks he is. The thetan is immortal and is possessed of capabilities well in excess of those hitherto predicted for man.
    6. the name given to the life source. It is the individual, the being, the personality, the knowingness of the human being.
    7 . energy space production unit.
    8 . in the final analysis what is this thing called thetan? It is simply you
    before you mocked yourself up and that is the handiest definition I know of.
    9 . the person himself—not his body or his name, the physical universe, his mind, or anything else; that which is aware of being aware; the identity which is the individual. The thetan is most familiar to one and all as you.
    10. a static that can consider, and can produce space and
    energy and objects .

    ENTHETA, 1 . means enturbulated theta (thought or life); especially refers to communications, which, based on lies and confusions, are slanderous, choppy or destructive in an attempt to overwhelm or suppress a person or group.
    2 . theta which has been confused and chaotically mixed with the
    material universe and which will lie in this confusion until death or some other process disenturbulates it. Theta, below 2 .0 on the tone scale, we call entheta.
    3 . anger, sarcasm, despair, slyly destructive suggestions.

    ENTURBULATE, cause to be turbulent or agitated and disturbed.

    VIEWPOINT, 1. a point of awareness from which one can perceive.
    2 . that thing which an individual puts out remotely, to look through. A system of remote lookingness— we’ll call it just remote viewpoint. That’s a specialized kind of viewpoint. And the place from which the individual is himself looking, we’ll call flatly a viewpoint.
    3 . evaluation is the reactive mind’s conception of viewpoint. The reactive mind does not perceive, it evaluates. To the analytical mind it may sometimes appear that the reactive mind has a viewpoint. The reactive mind does not have a viewpoint, it has an evaluation of viewpoint. Thus the viewpoint of the analytical mind is an actual point from which one perceives. Perception is done by sight, sound, smell,
    tactile, etc. The reactive mind’s ‘viewpoint’ is an opinion based on another opinion and upon a very small amount of observation, and that observation would be formed out of uncertainties. Thus the confusion of the word viewpoint itself. It can be a point from which one can be aware, which is its analytical definition, and it can be somebody’s ideas on a certain subject which is the reactive definition.

    ANALYTICAL MIND, 1 . the conscious aware mind which thinks, observes data, remembers it, and resolves problems. It would be essentially the conscious mind as opposed to the unconscious mind. The analytical mind is the one which is alert and aware and the reactive mind simply reacts without analysis.
    2. that mind which combines perceptions of the immediate environment, of the past (via pictures) and estimations of the future into conclusions which are based upon the realities of situations. The analytical mind combines the potential knowingness of the thetan with the conditions of his surroundings and brings him to independent conclusions. This mind could be said to consist of visual pictures either of the past or the physical universe, monitored by, and presided over, by the knowingness of a thetan. The keynote of the analytical mind is awareness, one knows what one is concluding and knows what he is doing.
    3 . the awareness of awareness unit plus some evaluative circuit or circuits, or machinery to make the handling of the body possible.
    4. that part of the being which perceives, when the individual is awake or in normal sleep (for sleep is not unconsciousness, and anything the individual has perceived while he was asleep is recorded in the standard memory banks and is relatively easy for the auditor to recover).

    REACTIVE MIND, 1. a portion of a person's mind which works on a totally stimulus-response basis, which is not under his volitional control, and which exerts force and the power of command over his awareness, purposes, thoughts, body and actions. Stored in the reactive mind are engrams, and here we find the single source of aberrations and psychosomatic ills. (Scn 0-8, p. 11) 2 . comprises an unknowing, unwanted series of aberrated computations which bring about an effect upon the individual and those around him. It is an obsessive strata of unknown, unseen, uninspected data which are forcing solutions, unknown and unsuspected, on the individual—which tells you why it remained hidden from man for so many thousands of years. (Scn 0-8, p. 11) 3. is basically that area of occlusion which the pc is unable to contact and which contains within itself a total identification of all things with all things, and until released into the realm of knowingness continues to react upon the person compelling him into actions, dramatizations and computations which are not optimum to his or anyone else's survival.
    4. the reactive mind is a stimulus response mechanism, ruggedly built, and operable in trying circumstances. The reactive mind never stops operating. Pictures of the environment, of a very low order, are taken by this mind even in some states of unconsciousness. The reactive mind acts below the level of consciousness. It is the literal stimulus-response mind. Given a certain stimulus it gives a certain response.
    5. once called the “unconscious” mind. It is a tough, rugged mind which is alert during any moment of life, regardless of the presence of pain, and which records everything with idiotic faithfulness. It stores up the entheta and enmest of an accident with all the perceptics (sense messages) present during the “unconsciousness” resulting from the accident.
    6 . once known as the “unconscious mind,” but this terminology is highly misleading, because the reactive mind is the mind which is always conscious.
    7. also known as the R6 bank.

    GENETIC ENTITY, 1. that beingness not dissimilar to the thetan which has carried forward and developed the body from its earliest moments along the evolutionary line on earth and which, through experience, necessity and natural selection, has employed the counter-efforts of the environment to fashion an organism of the type best fitted for survival, limited only by the abilities of the genetic entity. The goal of the genetic entity is survival on a much grosser plane of materiality.
    2 . formerly referred to as the somatic mind. It has no real personality, it is not the “I” of the body. This is the “mind” of an animal, a dog or a cat or a cow.
    3. that entity which is carrying along through time, that is making the body through the time stream, through the action of sex and so forth. Abbr. GE.
    Last edited by jiminii; 15th June 2013 at 19:23.

  8. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to jiminii For This Post:

    dan33 (27th April 2018), johnf (15th June 2013), soleil (19th June 2013), Swanette (20th June 2013), we-R-one (15th June 2013)

  9. Link to Post #5
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    11th May 2013
    Location
    asia
    Age
    80
    Posts
    2,065
    Thanks
    1,980
    Thanked 10,011 times in 1,932 posts

    Default Re: Jiminii's Viewpoint on LRH's Philosophy (In easily understood language)

    Maitreya
    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    This article is about the Buddhist bodhisattva Maitreya. For other uses, see Maitreya (disambiguation).
    Maitreya Buddha

    Bodhisattva Maitreya from the 2nd Century Gandharan Art Period
    Sanskrit: मैत्रेय (Maitreya)
    Pāli Metteyya
    ယChinese: 彌勒菩薩 (Mílè Púsa)
    Japanese: 弥勒菩薩 (Miroku Bosatsu)
    Korean: 미륵보살 (Mireuk Bosal)
    ဢရီႉမိတ်ႈတေႇယႃႉThai: พระศรีอริยเมตไตรย (Phra Sri Araya Mettrai)
    Tibetan: བྱམས་པ་
    Information
    Venerated by: Theravada, Mahayana, Vajrayana
    Attributes: Great Benevolence
    Preceded By: Gautama Buddha
    Portal:Buddhism

    Maitreya (Sanskrit), Metteyya (Pāli), Maithree (Sinhala), or Jampa (Tibetan), is foretold as a future Buddha of this world in Buddhist eschatology. In some Buddhist literature, such as the Amitabha Sutra and the Lotus Sutra, he is referred to as Ajita Bodhisattva.
    Maitreya is a bodhisattva who in the Buddhist tradition is to appear on Earth, achieve complete enlightenment, and teach the pure dharma. According to scriptures, Maitreya will be a successor of the historic Śākyamuni Buddha. The prophecy of the arrival of Maitreya references a time when the Dharma will have been forgotten on Jambudvipa. It is found in the canonical literature of all Buddhist sects (Theravāda, Mahāyāna, Vajrayāna), and is accepted by most Buddhists as a statement about an event that will take place when the Dharma will have been forgotten on Earth.

    The name Maitreya (Metteyya in Pāli) is derived from the Sanskrit word maitrī (Pāli: mettā) meaning "loving-kindness", which is in turn derived from the noun mitra (Pāli: mitta) in the sense of "friend".
    Metteyya is mentioned in the Cakavatti (Sihanada) Sutta (Digha Nikaya 26) of the Pali Canon. He appears in no other sutta in the Pali Canon, and this has cast doubt as to the sutta's authenticity. Most of the Buddha's sermons are presented as having been presented in answer to a question, or in some other appropriate context, but this sutta has a beginning and ending in which the Buddha is talking to monks about something totally different. This leads Gombrich to conclude that either the whole sutta is apocryphal, or that it has at least been tampered with.[1]


    The Bodhisattva Maitreya (water bottle on left thigh), art of Mathura, 2nd century AD.
    Maitreya is sometimes represented seated on a throne Western-style, and venerated both in Mahāyāna and non-Mahāyāna Buddhism. Some have speculated that inspiration for Maitreya may have come from the ancient Indo-Iranian deity Mithra. The primary comparison between the two characters appears to be the similarity of their names. According to a book entitled The Religion of the Iranian Peoples, "No one who has studied the Zoroastrian doctrine of the Saoshyants or the coming saviour-prophets can fail to see their resemblance to the future Maitreya.[2]
    Paul Williams claims that some Zoroastrian ideas like Saoshyant influenced the beliefs about Maitreya, such as "expectations of a heavenly helper, the need to opt for positive righteousness, the future millennium, and universal salvation". Possible objections are that these characteristics are not unique to Zoroastrianism, nor are they necessarily characteristic of the belief in Maitreya.
    It is also possible that Maitreya Buddha originated with the Hindu Kalki, and that its similarities with the Iranian Mithra have to do with their common Indo-Iranian origin.
    In the Greco-Buddhist art of Gandhara, in the first centuries CE in northern India, Maitreya was the most popular figure to be represented, together with the Buddha Śākyamuni. In China, in the 4th–6th Centuries "Buddhist artisans used the names Shakyamuni and Maitreya interchangeably... indicating both that the distinction between the two had not yet been drawn and that their respective iconographies had not yet been firmly set"[3] An example is the stone sculpture found in the Qingzhou cache dedicated to Maitreya in 529 CE as recorded in the inscription (currently in the Qingzhou Museum, Shandong). The cult of Maitreya apparently developed around the same time of that of Amitābha, as early as the 3rd century CE.
    Characteristics[edit]



    A 9th-century CE Srivijayan art bronze Maitreya from South Sumatra, a stupa adorn his crown.
    One mention of the prophecy of Maitreya is in the Sanskrit text, the Maitreyavyākaraṇa (The Prophecy of Maitreya). It implies that he is a teacher of meditative trance sadhana and states that gods, men and other beings:
    will lose their doubts, and the torrents of their cravings will be cut off: free from all misery they will manage to cross the ocean of becoming; and, as a result of Maitreya's teachings, they will lead a holy life. No longer will they regard anything as their own, they will have no possession, no gold or silver, no home, no relatives! But they will lead the holy life of oneness under Maitreya's guidance. They will have torn the net of the passions, they will manage to enter into trances, and theirs will be an abundance of joy and happiness, for they will lead a holy life under Maitreya's guidance. (Trans. in Conze 1959:241)
    General description[edit]

    Maitreya is typically pictured seated, with either both feet on the ground or crossed at the ankles, on a throne, waiting for his time. He is dressed in the clothes of either a Bhiksu or Indian royalty. As a bodhisattva, he would usually be standing and dressed in jewels. Usually he wears a small stupa in his headdress that represents the stupa of the Buddha Sakyamuni's relics to help him identify it when his turn comes to lay claim to his succession, and can be holding a dharmachakra resting on a lotus. A khata is always tied around his waist as a girdle.
    In the Greco-Buddhist art of Gandhara, in the first centuries CE in northern India, Maitreya is represented as a Central Asian or northern Indian nobleman, holding a "water phial" (Sanskrit: Kumbha) in his left hand. Sometimes this is a "wisdom urn" (Sanskrit: Bumpa). He is flanked by his two acolytes, the brothers Asanga and Vasubandhu.
    Maitreya-samiti was an extensive Buddhist play in Pre-Islamic Central Asia[4][5] The Maitreyavyakarana (in Sataka form) in Central Asia and Anagatavamsa in South India also mentioned him.[6][7]
    Some Buddhists wished to stay with him after death.[8][9] I-kuan Tao have different descriptions of him.[10][11]
    Maitreya's Tuṣita Heaven[edit]



    The future Buddha Maitreya, Gandhara, 3rd century CE.
    Maitreya currently resides in the Tuṣita Heaven (Pāli: Tusita), said to be reachable through meditation. Śākyamuni Buddha also lived here before he was born into the world as all bodhisattvas live in the Tuṣita Heaven before they descend to the human realm to become Buddhas. Although all bodhisattvas are destined to become Buddhas, the concept of a bodhisattva differs greatly in Theravada and Mahayana Buddhism. In Theravada Buddhism, a bodhisattva is one who is striving for full enlightenment (Arahantship in Pali), whereas in Mahayana Buddhism, a bodhisattva is one who has already reached a very advanced state of grace or enlightenment but holds back from entering nirvana so that he may help others.
    In Mahayana Buddhism, once Maitreya becomes a Buddha, he will rule over the Ketumati Pure Land, an earthly paradise sometimes associated with the Indian city of Varanasi (also known as Benares) in Uttar Pradesh. In Mahayana Buddhism, Buddhas preside over a Pure Land (the Buddha Amitabha presides over the Sukhavati Pure Land, more popularly known as the Western Paradise).[12]
    In Theravadin Buddhism, Buddhas are born as unenlightened humans, and are not rulers of any paradise or pure land. Maitreya's arising would be no different to the arising of Shakyamuni Buddha, as he achieved full-enlightenment as a human being, and passed away into parinibbana when the conditions were ripe for his final passing. Orthodox Theravadin doctrine has much less emphasis on deities and Bodhisattvas, and do not view Bodhisattvas to be in an unachievable state.
    Activity of Maitreya in the current age[edit]

    Main article: Maitreya-nātha
    In Mahayana schools, Maitreya is traditionally said to have revealed the Five Treatises of Maitreya through Asanga. These important texts are the basis of the Yogachara tradition and constitute the majority of the Third Turning of the Wheel of Dharma.
    Future coming of Maitreya[edit]



    32 metre (110 ft) statue of Maitreya Buddha in Nubra Valley, Ladakh, India, facing down the Shyok River towards Pakistan.
    Maitreya will be the fifth Buddha of the present kalpa[clarification needed] (aeon) and his arrival will occur after the teachings (dharma) of the Buddha are no longer practiced.
    His coming is characterized by a number of physical events. The oceans are predicted to decrease in size, allowing Maitreya to traverse them freely. Maitreya will then reintroduce "true" dharma to world.
    His arrival signifies the end of the middle time, the time between the fourth Buddha, Gautama Buddha, and the fifth Buddha, Maitreya, which is viewed as a low point of human existence. According to the Cakkavatti Sutta: The Wheel-turning Emperor, Digha Nikaya 26 of the Sutta Pitaka of the Pāli Canon), Maitreya Buddha will be born in a time when humans will live to an age of eighty thousand years, in the city of Ketumatī (present Benares), whose king will be the Cakkavattī Sankha. Sankha will live in the palace where once dwelt King Mahāpanadā, but later he will give the palace away and will himself become a follower of Maitreya Buddha.[13]
    The scriptures say that Maitreya will attain bodhi in seven days (which is the minimum period), by virtue of his many lives of preparation for Buddhahood (similar to those reported in the Jataka stories of Shakyamuni Buddha).
    At this time a notable teaching he will start giving is that of the ten non-virtuous deeds (killing, stealing, sexual misconduct, lying, divisive speech, abusive speech, idle speech, covetousness, harmful intent and wrong views) and the ten virtuous deeds (the abandonment of: killing, stealing, sexual misconduct, lying, divisive speech, abusive speech, idle speech, covetousness, harmful intent and wrong views).
    The Arya Maitreya Mandala, founded by Lama Anagarika Govinda is based on the idea of the future coming of Maitreya.
    Nichiren Buddhism and Maitreya as metaphor[edit]



    Statue of Maitreya Buddha at Wat Intharawihan, Bangkok
    According to the Lotus Sutra of Nichiren Buddhism, each person possesses the potential to reveal an innate Buddha nature during their own lifetime, a concept which may appear to contradict the concept of Buddha as savior or messiah.
    Although Maitreya is a significant figure in the Lotus Sutra, the explanation of Nichiren is that Maitreya is a metaphor of stewardship and aid for the Bodhisattvas of the Earth, as written in the Lotus Sutra:
    Moreover...all the bodhisattvas, Bodhisattva Maitreya....will guard and protect the votaries of the Lotus Sutra, so one may indeed rest assured.[14]
    In much of his writing, Nichiren mentions the traditional Buddhist views on Maitreya but explains that the propagation of the Eternal Dharma of the Lotus Sutra was entrusted by Shakyamuni to the Bodhisattvas of earth
    The Buddha did not entrust these five characters to Maitreya, Medicine King, or the others of their group. Instead he summoned forth the bodhisattvas....from the great earth of Tranquil Light and transferred the five characters to them.[15]
    Thus, each individual can embody the character of the Maitreya because he is a metaphor for compassion:
    The name Maitreya means ‘Compassionate One’ and designates the Votaries of the Lotus Sutra.[16]
    Non-Buddhist views[edit]

    The concept of Maitreya was elaborated within Theosophy during the last few decades of the 19th century. However the Theosophical Maitreya was explained, and developed, differently than the original Buddhist concept. In Theosophical texts Maitreya has multiple aspects signifying not just the future Buddha, but similar concepts from other religious or spiritual traditions.[17]
    In early 20th century, leading Theosophists became convinced that an appearance of the Maitreya as a so-called World Teacher was imminent. A South Indian boy, Jiddu Krishnamurti, was thought to be destined as the "vehicle" of the soon-to-manifest Maitreya; however the manifestation did not happen as predicted, and did not fulfil Theosophists' expectations.[18]
    Since the growth of the Theosophical movement in the 19th century, and influenced by Theosophy's articulations on the Maitreya, non-Buddhist religious and spiritual movements have adopted and reinterpreted the concept in their doctrines. Share International, which equates Maitreya with the prophesied figures of multiple religious traditions, claims that he is already present in the world, but is preparing to make an open declaration of his presence in the near future. They claim that he is here to inspire mankind to create a new era based on sharing and justice.[19]
    In the beginning of the 1930s, the Ascended Master Teachings placed Maitreya in the "Office of World Teacher" until 1956, when he was described as moving on to the "Office of Planetary Buddha" and "Cosmic Christ" in their concept of a Spiritual Hierarchy.
    Some Muslim scholars who studied Buddhist texts believe that Maitreya is "Rahmatu lil-'alameen" (Mercy for The Worlds), which is the name for the prophet Muhammad as it is said in the Qur'an.[20] According to the research on the book Antim Buddha - Maitreya scholars have surmised that Maitreya Buddha is Muhammad.[21] After examining the Buddhist texts researchers concluded that Muhammad had been the last and final awakened Buddha to come into existence long after the current teachings.[22]
    The 19th century, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, is believed in by the members of the Ahmadiyya Community (the faith he brought) as fulfilling expectations regarding the Maitreya Buddha.[23]
    Bahá'ís believe that Bahá'u'lláh is the fulfillment of the prophecy of appearance of Maitreya.[24][25] Bahá'ís believe that the prophecy that Maitreya will usher in a new society of tolerance and love has been fulfilled by Bahá'u'lláh's teachings on world peace.[24]
    Maitreya claimants[edit]

    Main article: List of Buddha claimants


    Close-up of a statue depicting Maitreya at the Thikse Monastery in Ladakh, India. Depictions of Maitreya vary among Buddhist sects.


    Seated Maitreya, Korean, 4-5th century CE. Guimet Museum.


    The monk Budai as an incarnation of Maitreya
    Since his death, the Chinese monk Budai (Hotei) has been popularly regarded as an incarnation of the bodhisattva Maitreya. His depiction as the Laughing Buddha continues to be very popular in East Asian culture.[dubious – discuss]
    While a number of persons have proclaimed themselves to be Maitreya over the years following the Buddha’s parinirvana, none have been officially recognized by the sangha and Buddhists. A particular difficulty faced by any would-be claimant to Maitreya's title is the fact that the Buddha is considered to have made a number of fairly specific predictions regarding the circumstances that would occur prior to Maitreya's coming; such as that the teachings of the Buddha would be completely forgotten, and all of the remaining relics of Sakyamuni Buddha would be gathered in Bodh Gaya and cremated.[dubious – discuss]
    The following list is just a small selection of those people who claimed or claim to be the incarnation of Maitreya. Many have either used the Maitreya incarnation claim to form a new Buddhist sect or have used the name of Maitreya to form a new religious movement or cult.
    In 613 the monk Xiang Haiming claimed himself Maitreya and adopted imperial title.[26]
    In 690 Empress Wu inaugurated the Second Zhou dynasty, proclaimed herself an incarnation of the future Buddha Maitreya, and made Luoyang the "holy capital." In 693 she replaced the compulsory Dao De Jing in the curriculum temporarily with her own Rules for Officials.[27]
    Gung Ye, a Korean warlord and king of short-lived state of Taebong during the 10th century, claimed himself as living incarnation of Maitreya and ordered his subjects to worship him. His claim was widely rejected by most Buddhist monks and later he was dethroned and killed by his own servants.
    Lu Zhong Yi, the 17th patriarch of I-Kuan Tao, claimed to be an incarnation of Maitreya.
    Peter Deunov (Master Beinsa Douno) - spiritual teacher, founder of a teaching and school of Esoteric Christianity. Some students of Rudolf Steiner, an Austrian philosopher, have identified Master Beinsa Douno as a manifestation of Maitreya in the late 20th century.
    L. Ron Hubbard, founder of the belief systems Dianetics and Scientology, suggested he was "Metteya" (Maitreya) in the 1955 poem Hymn of Asia. Numerous editors and followers of Hubbard claim that in the book's preface, specific physical characteristics said to be outlined—in unnamed Sanskrit sources—as properties of the coming Maitreya; properties which Hubbard's appearance supposedly aligned with.
    Samael Aun Weor - stated in The Aquarian Message that "the Maitreya Buddha Samael is the Kalki Avatar of the New Age." The Kalkian Avatar and Maitreya Buddha, he claimed, are the same "White Rider" of the book of Revelation.
    Adi Da was suggested by his devotees to be Maitreya: "an All-Surpassing God-Man yet to come -- a final Avatar, the ultimate Messiah, a consumate Prophet or Enlightened Sage, a Spiritual Deliverer who will appear in the 'late-time', the 'dark' epoch when humanity is lost, apparently cut off from Wisdom, Truth and God. Buddhists call that Expected One 'Maitreya'." [28]
    Raël's (Claude Vorilhon's) Maitreya claims [1] center on the content of the Agama Sutra (Japanese: Agon Sutra),[29] supposedly a very ancient text written by Buddha himself, but which has been deemphasized or forgotten by the majority of Buddhist cultures.[30] Raël has claimed directly to people attending Asia Raëlian Church seminars, that someone born in France, a country which is often symbolized by the cock (or rooster), west of the Orient, meets the criteria of the Maitreya. Rael himself claims to be this individual.[31]
    Maitreya sects in China[edit]

    Pre-Maitreyan Buddhist messianic rebellions[edit]
    Southern and Northern Dynasties[edit]
    515: The Mahayana Rebellion. In the late summer of that year, the renegade monk Faqing 法慶 married a nun and formed a sect in the Northern Wei province of Jizhou 冀州 (in the southern part of today’s Hebei province) with the assistance of a local aristocrat named Li Guibo 李歸伯. The sect was named the Mahayana ("The Great Vehicle", in reference to Mahayana Buddhism), and Li Guibo was given the titles of Tenth-stage Bodhisattva, Commander of the Demon-vanquishing Army, and King who Pacifies the Land of Han by Faqing.
    Using drugs to send its members into a killing frenzy, and promoting them to Tenth-Stage Bodhisattva as soon as they killed ten enemies, the Mahayana sect seized a prefecture and murdered all the government officials in it. Their slogan was "A new Buddha has entered the world; eradicate the demons of the former age", and they would kill all monks and nuns in the monasteries that they captured, also burning all the sutras and icons. After defeating a government army and growing to a size of over 50,000, the rebel army was finally crushed by another government army of 100,000. Faqing, his wife, and tens of thousands of his followers were beheaded, and Li Guibo was also captured later and publicly executed in the capital city Luoyang.
    The Fozu Tongji (Comprehensive Records of the Buddha), a chronicle of Buddhist history written by the monk Zhipan in 1269, also contains an account of the Mahayana Rebellion, but with significant deviations from the original account, such as dating the rebellion to 528 rather than 515.[32]
    516: The Moonlight Child Rebellion. Toward the end of that year, another sect was discovered by local authorities in Yanling. A man named Fa Quan and his associates were claiming that an eight-year-old child Liu Jinghui was a Bodhisattva called the Moonlight Child (yueguang tongzi pusa; 月光童子菩萨), and that he could transform into a snake or a pheasant. They were arrested and sentenced to death on suspicion of seditious intent, but Jinghui had his sentence commuted to banishment on account of his youth and ignorance.[32]
    517: Early in the spring of that year, surviving remnants of the Mahayana rebels regrouped and mounted a sudden attack on the capital of Yingzhou province, which lay just northwest of their original base in Bohai prefecture. They were repelled only after a pitched battle with an army of slaves and attendants led by Yuwen Yan, the son of the provincial governor, and nothing more is known of their fate.[32]
    Although a "new Buddha" was mentioned, these rebellions are not considered "Maitreyan" by modern scholars.[32] However, they would be a later influence on the rebel religious leaders that made such claims. Therefore, it is important to mention these rebellions in this context.
    Maitreyan rebellions[edit]
    Sui Dynasty[edit]
    610: On the first day of the Chinese New Year, dozens of rebels dressed in white, burning incense and holding flowers proclaimed their leader as Maitreya Buddha and charged into the imperial palace through one of its gates, killing all the guards before they were themselves killed by troops led by an imperial prince. A massive investigation in the capital (Chang'an) implicated over a thousand families.[32]
    613: A skilled magician named Song Zixian claimed to be Maitreya in Tang County (northwest of Yingzhou), and allegedly could transform into the form of Buddha and make his room emit a glow every night. He hung a mirror in a hall that could display an image of what a devotee would be reincarnated as: a snake, a beast or a human being. Nearly a thousand "from near and far" joined his sect every day, and he plotted to first hold a Buddhist vegetarian banquet, or wuzhe fohui, and then attack the emperor who was then touring Yingzhou. The plot was leaked, and Song was arrested and executed, along with over a thousand families of his followers.[32]
    613: The monk Xiang Haiming claimed to be Maitreya in Fufeng prefecture (western Shaanxi) and led a rebellion. The elite of the Chang’an area hailed him as dasheng, or holy man, because they had auspicious dreams after following him, and his army swelled to several tens of thousands before he was defeated by government troops.[32]
    Tang Dynasty[edit]
    710: Wang Huaigu declared, "The Shakyamuni Buddha has declined; a new Buddha is about to appear. The House of Li is ending, and the House of Liu is about to rise".[26]
    Song Dynasty[edit]
    1047: Army officer Wang Ze led a revolt of Buddhists expecting Maitreya; they took over the city of Beizhou in Hebei before they were crushed.[33] The Song Dynasty government declared Maitreya Sects to be "heresies and unsanctioned religions". Tens of thousands of Maitreya Sect followers were killed.[34]
    Yuan and Ming Dynasty[edit]
    1351: The Red Turban Rebellion (a.ka. The First White Lotus Rebellion). Han Shantong (韓山童), leader of the White Lotus Society, and Army Commander Liu Futong (劉福通) rebelled against the Mongol masters of the Yuan Dynasty. Shantong's anti-Mongol slogan was "The empire is in utter chaos. Maitreya Buddha has incarnated, and the Manichaean King of Light has appeared in this world."[26]
    In 1355, Han Shantong's son, Han Lin'er (韓林兒), was proclaimed "Emperor of the Great [Latter] Song" (大宋, referring to the dead Song Dynasty) (1355-1368?) by Liu Futong. Liu Futong claimed Han Lin'er was a direct descendent of the Zhao royal family who ruled the Song Dynasty. After Liu Futong's death, Zhu Yuanzhang took up command of the Red Turban Rebellion and later assassinated Han Lin'er to become Emperor Hongwu of the Ming Dynasty. (See History)
    According to Beijing University,[35]
    “ The leader of White Lotus sect, Han Shantong called himself Ming Wang (明王 - "King of Brightness"), while his son, Han Lin'er called himself Xiao Ming Wang (小明王 - "Small King of Brightness"), both names reflecting the sect's beliefs. Zhu Yuanzhang had been a member of the White lotus Sect, and admitted to have been a branch of the White Lotus rebel army (being at one time vice-marshal of Xiao Ming Wang). When Zhu Yuanzhang took power, he chose the dynastic name "Ming". ”
    This suggests that the Ming Dynasty was named after the White Lotus figures of the "Big and Little Bright Kings".
    Post-Maitreyan rebellions[edit]


    Maitreya and disciples, in Budai form, as depicted at the Feilai Feng grottos near Lingyin Temple in China
    Qing Dynasty[edit]
    1796: The White Lotus Rebellion (a.k.a. The Second White Lotus Rebellion). It broke out among impoverished settlers in the mountainous region that separates Sichuan province from Hubei and Shaanxi provinces. It apparently began as a White Lotus Society protest against heavy taxes imposed by Manchu rulers of the Qing Dynasty.[36]
    The Yi He Tuan (義和團), often called in English the "Society of Harmonious Fists" was a 19th-century martial-sect inspired in part by the White Lotus Society. Members of the "Harmonious Fists" became known as "Boxers" in the west because they practiced Chinese martial arts.
    1899: The Boxer Rebellion (義和團之亂). Chinese rebellion from November 1899 to September 7, 1901 against foreign influence in such areas as trade, politics, religion and technology that occurred in China during the final years of the Qing Dynasty. By August 1900, over 230 foreigners, tens of thousands of Chinese Christians, an unknown number of rebels, their sympathizers and other innocent bystanders had been killed in the chaos. The uprising crumbled on August 14, 1900 when 20,000 foreign troops entered the Chinese capital, Peking (Beijing).
    Albeit not in the name of Maitreya, both rebellions were perpetrated solely or in part by the White Lotus Society, a rebellious Maitreya sect.
    Alternative persona[edit]

    There was a sage of the same name in the epic Mahabharata. His lineage is unknown. He came to the court of Hastinapura to advise Duryodhana to restore the kingdom of the Pandavas, a little while after the sons of Pandu had gone into exile, having been defeated at dice.
    However, Duryodhana didn't even bother to listen to the sage, and showed his disrespect all too plainly. Incensed, the sage cursed him and said, "Fourteen years hence, you shall be destroyed in battle by the Pandavas, along with your kinsmen and all that you hold dear. Bheema shall dispatch you to the abode of Yama, by breaking your thighs with the mace." Some hold that the curse of this sage played a major part in encompassing the destruction of the Kauravas.[37]
    Last edited by jiminii; 15th June 2013 at 19:41.

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jiminii For This Post:

    johnf (15th June 2013), Orph (15th June 2013)

  11. Link to Post #6
    United States Avalon Member gripreaper's Avatar
    Join Date
    2nd January 2011
    Posts
    3,979
    Thanks
    9,625
    Thanked 29,695 times in 3,744 posts

    Default Re: Jiminii's Viewpoint on LRH's Philosophy (In easily understood language)

    It's soulstream energy, not an entity in form. IF I start walking on water, repeating your thoughts back to you, manifesting objects out of nothing right in front of you in an instant, I'm going to be of interest to the elite to exploit, and I will be of special interest to the average person who will want to deify me into a god and raise me up as a savior and cling to me and suck my energy.

    Both approaches are parasitical. We need a new approach. Emanating this soul energy into the matrix because we are all going together this time. No more saviors and no more guru's.
    "Lay Down Your Truth and Check Your Weapons
    The Next Voice You Hear Will Be Your OWN"
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhS69C1tr0w

  12. The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to gripreaper For This Post:

    conk (18th June 2013), donk (17th June 2013), Fred Steeves (15th June 2013), heyokah (16th June 2013), InCiDeR (15th June 2013), johnf (15th June 2013), Kraut (15th June 2013), Mike (15th June 2013), mosquito (16th June 2013), Orph (15th June 2013), Padmé (17th June 2013), seko (15th June 2013), Sunny-side-up (16th June 2013), thunder24 (15th June 2013)

  13. Link to Post #7
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    11th May 2013
    Location
    asia
    Age
    80
    Posts
    2,065
    Thanks
    1,980
    Thanked 10,011 times in 1,932 posts

    Default Re: Jiminii's Viewpoint on LRH's Philosophy (In easily understood language)

    this definition of Meitreya in (sanscrit) or Metteyya (in pali)

    comes from wikipedia ... but even wikipedia DOES NOT KNOW WHO METTEYYA IS

    Metteyya is the Thetan ... of the viewpoint named Siddhartha Gautama ... Buddha
    Metteyya is the Thetan ... of the viewpoint named LRH L Ron Hubbard
    Mettayya is the Thetan ... of the viewpoint named . jiminii and that is me

    Metteyya is the Thetan .... to about a million or more Viewpoints similar to me ... created right out of source and send here to raise the vibrations of the planet
    now in my case it was a mission ... but not all viewpoints were sent back to just raise the vibrations of the planet ,..

    Ok viewpoint is like the golden ball that is near the body that if someone can see it outside their body ... they probably thought this was the spirit

    the spirit (Thetan) .. is not in the physical universe MEST (matter energy space and time)
    this MEST universe is being created by all the viewpoints inside this universe from the Thetans that are OUTSIDE this MEST universe
    the Thetans are static ... no motion no wavelenth .. not matrer no energy no space no time ... but they can create all of these.

    I do not know the others ... I have met another named cathy who was created and sent here ... but i do not know what Thetan (spirit) she came from

    Inelia Benz says she comes from the Thetan (spirit) of Gaia and as far as i know Gaia also has sent some millions here ... along with the other big beings ... (not sure how many millions were sent in all)

    I was trained up to Master Games Player ... and maybe more ... but I did recognize I had finished all the OT (operating thetan) levels they have at Ron's Org

    But there must be one viewpoint that can go to source and create these other viewpoints ...

    next I will go into the creation

    jim
    Last edited by jiminii; 15th June 2013 at 18:36.

  14. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to jiminii For This Post:

    johnf (15th June 2013), Orph (15th June 2013), soleil (19th June 2013), we-R-one (15th June 2013)

  15. Link to Post #8
    United States Avalon Member Mike's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th January 2011
    Location
    journeying to the end of the night
    Age
    48
    Posts
    6,880
    Thanks
    42,844
    Thanked 61,330 times in 6,794 posts

    Default Re: Jiminii's Viewpoint on LRH's Philosophy (In easily understood language)

    Quote Posted by jiminii (here)
    Ok so we start with what we are ... so we need some definitions for this

    tone scale is an arbitrary number of the emotions of a spirit from minus 40 to plus 40

    https://projectavalon.net/forum4/atta...1&d=1371308378

    hi Jiminii,

    curious: how is one's tone deduced accurately from this, as you say, arbitrary system?

    is it true that Hubbard wanted to ban "low tone" people from mainstream society? i think I recall reading this in a book called 'Inside Scientology'.

    what's your take?

  16. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Mike For This Post:

    InCiDeR (15th June 2013), johnf (15th June 2013), Padmé (17th June 2013), we-R-one (15th June 2013)

  17. Link to Post #9
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    11th May 2013
    Location
    asia
    Age
    80
    Posts
    2,065
    Thanks
    1,980
    Thanked 10,011 times in 1,932 posts

    Default Re: Jiminii's Viewpoint on LRH's Philosophy (In easily understood language)

    Quote Posted by gripreaper (here)
    It's soulstream energy, not an entity in form. IF I start walking on water, repeating your thoughts back to you, manifesting objects out of nothing right in front of you in an instant, I'm going to be of interest to the elite to exploit, and I will be of special interest to the average person who will want to deify me into a god and raise me up as a savior and cling to me and suck my energy.

    Both approaches are parasitical. We need a new approach. Emanating this soul energy into the matrix because we are all going together this time. No more saviors and no more guru's.
    right ...
    I just gave the definitions as were interpreted by someone who probably got it from LRH's lectures
    we don't need to have any more saviors or guru's ... each here is in part creating this universe

    we didn't all come into this physical universe at the same time but we follow the mechanics of it

    jim

  18. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to jiminii For This Post:

    johnf (15th June 2013), Orph (15th June 2013), soleil (19th June 2013), we-R-one (15th June 2013)

  19. Link to Post #10
    Deactivated
    Join Date
    6th December 2010
    Posts
    600
    Thanks
    1,824
    Thanked 2,110 times in 521 posts

    Default Re: Jiminii's Viewpoint on LRH's Philosophy (In easily understood language)

    LRH philosophy ...

    note: i am not, have not, neither do I intend to become a practicing Scien_olo___t, so I am explaining the information below as it was explained to me, and based on how I understood / interpreted the information.

    It was explained to me by a good friend, and he told me you would only come to know this if you heard it directly from LRH or his notes. ie. practicing Scien_olo___ts would NOT come to know this (not sure about the breakaway orgs though?):

    1. Scien_olo__ was designed to be oppressive
    2. he (LRH) is back and is behind this (curiously the way it was explained I can't confirm he's back in person?). It is essentially Scien_olo__ v2.0 .. more free and less oppressive than v1.0
    3. everything is "cooked" !! ie. we are one being (a god?), put in the ultimate prison (the ultimate prison is one you're in and you don't even know it! Supposedly the only way you can imprison / restrain something with god like powers?).
    4. this was not told told me, but i'm adding it as my conjecture: it is as if we (the one) are in a dream state (sleeping?)
    5. Everything you experience, everything that happens, everything you know is part of a "program" (very similar to a software program - a specific term was used) created by those that imprisoned us (other god/s?).
    6. When i say "everything" above i mean EVERYTHING: atoms, the universe, reality!!, ET's, God, the gods, ascension, multiple realities / dimensions, the cosmos, the emotional tone scale, Illuminati, DNA, ketchup the WHOLE lot! .. is all manufactured (electronically). This doesn't preclude what has been cooked up within the software being a reflection / representative of what's outside the software (real reality?)
    7. The techniques taught to Scien_olo____s breakdown these mini programs within the main program (a specific term was used - that I can't remember)
    8. When you have broken down ALL the programs, reality as you know it will cease to exist, only then will you be free
    9. We (the One?) have been in this program (prison?) for a long time (billions of years? ie. since the BEGINNING) and it will continue to exist for billions of years (to the END?)
    10. Our prisoner/s? come from a location, we also came from there. Very little is know about "them" and "there" for obvious reasons.
    11. We were imprisoned because we caused trouble (for them?). We didn't tow the party line?
    12. my thoughts - if we are dealing with "software", most probably an AI, it must manage itself in a particular way, if one understood this, could the software (us) manage / manipulate the software (the container)?
    13. i was also told within the "software", Jews ( i don't know which group) was nominated by the "software" to manage "us" (the human code within the software). As you know the "us" within the software has many aspects ie. the physical / non-pysical etc. (but all still within the software).
    14. in Kerry's latest Awake and Aware conference it was interesting to hear Preston Nichols' talk, he pretty much said all the above in a similar way.
    15. there are "groups" that understand the above (part of the One ie. within the "software") and use this understanding to control / manipulate others / reality etc. (really just parts of the software managing other parts of the software).

    fyi .. these are know as the Sci.... axioms. Have a read!

    Strange theory ey?

    .. the chap who explained this to me knows his stuff and can manipulate reality. Don't casually scuff this info aside, give it some consideration. Appears there is a lot of other philosophy / models out there that correlate with this in some manner.
    Last edited by Aurelius; 15th June 2013 at 20:11.

  20. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Aurelius For This Post:

    conk (18th June 2013), InCiDeR (15th June 2013), johnf (15th June 2013)

  21. Link to Post #11
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    11th May 2013
    Location
    asia
    Age
    80
    Posts
    2,065
    Thanks
    1,980
    Thanked 10,011 times in 1,932 posts

    Default Re: Jiminii's Viewpoint on LRH's Philosophy (In easily understood language)

    Quote Posted by Chinaski (here)
    Quote Posted by jiminii (here)
    Ok so we start with what we are ... so we need some definitions for this

    tone scale is an arbitrary number of the emotions of a spirit from minus 40 to plus 40

    https://projectavalon.net/forum4/atta...1&d=1371308378

    hi Jiminii,

    curious: how is one's tone deduced accurately from this, as you say, arbitrary system?

    is it true that Hubbard wanted to ban "low tone" people from mainstream society? i think I recall reading this in a book called 'Inside Scientology'.

    what's your take?
    wow that jpg is so small how do we make it bigger ...

    he found this tone scale through auditing people .. he found people would be stuck somewhere on this scale ... like the person is always in grief ... or anger .. that is their typical everyday emotion

    so then he found tones below death ... like owning bodies ... controlling bodies .. these are tone levels for the spirit being .. and then there is the tone levels for just a body ... (body with only a GE .. no spirit) they go from 0 death . to 4 enthusiasm
    but the spirit goes all the way to plus 40 .. 30 would be postulates .. being able to create an object out of nothing ...

    he found the tones were also a way to manage people ... he found that people who are in grief will not communicate with other tone levels ..

    he found in order to communicate with someone in grief . you have to come close to their tone level .. so just above grief is propitiation ... so you should communicate just between those to .. then the person will communicate with you
    then you keep raising the tone level so you can get the person out of grief
    same with other tone levels ... if someone is angry the next tone is pain ... so go between pain and anger you can raise the person out of anger ..

    something like this

    jim

  22. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to jiminii For This Post:

    johnf (15th June 2013), Mike (15th June 2013), skamandar (15th June 2013), soleil (19th June 2013)

  23. Link to Post #12
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    11th May 2013
    Location
    asia
    Age
    80
    Posts
    2,065
    Thanks
    1,980
    Thanked 10,011 times in 1,932 posts

    Default Re: Jiminii's Viewpoint on LRH's Philosophy (In easily understood language)

    Quote Posted by jiminii (here)
    Ok so we start with what we are ... so we need some definitions for this

    tone scale is an arbitrary number of the emotions of a spirit from minus 40 to plus 40

    click on the pictures to make them larger
    ok they are larger

  24. The Following User Says Thank You to jiminii For This Post:

    johnf (15th June 2013)

  25. Link to Post #13
    United States Avalon Member johnf's Avatar
    Join Date
    11th January 2011
    Location
    Oregon, USA
    Posts
    1,211
    Thanks
    8,460
    Thanked 6,373 times in 1,116 posts

    Default Re: Jiminii's Viewpoint on LRH's Philosophy (In easily understood language)

    Jim,
    Your avatar is reversed, Thunder24 has pointed this out to me, and I have just realized.

    Meteyya In Jim.

    Is that A LOL or what.

    Either way, it is a KOAN to comtemplate. Jim In Meteyya, Meteyya in Jim.
    Or for Anyone, Iam part of the All, and the All is in me, that sort of thing.

    jf
    Last edited by johnf; 15th June 2013 at 18:15.

  26. Link to Post #14
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    11th May 2013
    Location
    asia
    Age
    80
    Posts
    2,065
    Thanks
    1,980
    Thanked 10,011 times in 1,932 posts

    Default Re: Jiminii's Viewpoint on LRH's Philosophy (In easily understood language)

    Quote Posted by Aurelius (here)
    LRH philosophy ...

    note: i am not, have not, neither do I intend to become a practicing Scien_olo___t, so I am explaining the information below as it was explained to me, and based on how I understood / interpreted the information.

    It was explained to me by a good friend, and he told me you would only come to know this if you heard it from LRH directly or his notes. ie. by practicing Scien_olo___ts would NOT come to know this (not sure about the breakaway orgs though):

    1. Scien_olo___t was designed to be oppressive
    2. he (LRH) is back and is behind this (curiously the way it was explained I can't confirm he's back in person?). It is essentially Scien_olo__ v2.0 .. more free and less oppressive than v1.0
    3. everything is "cooked" !! ie. we are one being (a god?), put in the ultimate prison (the ultimate prison is one you're in and you don't even know it. Something that has to be done to something with ultimate god like powers?).
    4. this was not explicitly told told me, but i'm adding it away: it is as if we (the one) are in a dream state (sleeping?)
    5. Everything you experience, everything that happens, everything you know is part of a "program" (very similar to a software program - a specific term was used that I can't remember) created by those that imprisoned us (other god/s?).
    6. When i say "everything" above i mean EVERYTHING: atoms, the universe, reality!!, ET's, God, the gods, ascension, multiple realities / dimensions, the cosmos, the emotional tone scale, DNA, ketchup the WHOLE lot! .. was all manufactured (electronically).
    7. The techniques taught by Scien_olo__ breakdown these programs (a specific term was used that I can't remember)
    8. When you have broken down ALL the programs, reality as you know it will cease to exist, only then will you be free
    9. We (the one?) have been in this program (prison?) for a loooong time (billions of years? ie. since the BEGINNING) .. strange to say even through time doesn't really exist as we think it does. It will continue to exist for billions of years (the END?)
    10. Our prisoner/s? come from a location, we also came from there. Very little is know about them and there for obvious reasons.
    11. We were imprisoned because we caused trouble (for them?). We didn't tow the party line?

    fyi .. these are know as the Sci.... axioms. Have a read!

    Strange theory ey?

    .. the chap who explained this to knows his stuff. Don't casually scuff this info aside, give it some consideration.
    ok let's get this clear .. I will change the title of this thread to Jiminii's viewpoint of LRH's philosophy

    which should be done soon

    for one ... the Church of Scientology that is in existence now was designed to be oppressive and this is the reason

    LRH found that the church had been infiltrated by sleeper children controlled by reptilians .. when they grow up they will be managed by reptilians the same way that reptilians manage their own .. a queen bee manages her nest .. type thing
    so these sleeper children would wake up and take over the church of scientology from the inside ..and it's purpose was to steal all the OT (operating Thetan) levels to use for themselves to take over this planet . so LRH set it up so that those he trusted would not allow the upper OT levels to get into the hands of the reptilians .. the rest is history so the original Church of Scientology became oppressive
    LRH is not on the planet .. he is in galactic command center
    most of the people coming on this planet have been coming in the last 500 years prisoners of the last war in the stars
    and if you want to go back to that system .. you are welcome to do it ... it is identical to the USA government only the size of this galaxy bigger ... if you don't think you have freedom on this planet ... go back there ... where you came from
    if everything you experience is being caused by some program ... and you think it is all fate ... then you have lost control of your own ability to operate ... believing it is ALL GOING TO HAPPEN ANYWAY
    I do what I want ... I am not on some program someone else put me on ... I am doing my mission and I am not worried what will happen if I die
    if I die I will go back to the future where I came from ... do you know where you will go when you die?
    for the rest believe what you want

    jim
    Last edited by jiminii; 15th June 2013 at 19:45.

  27. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to jiminii For This Post:

    Aurelius (15th June 2013), johnf (15th June 2013), soleil (19th June 2013)

  28. Link to Post #15
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    11th May 2013
    Location
    asia
    Age
    80
    Posts
    2,065
    Thanks
    1,980
    Thanked 10,011 times in 1,932 posts

    Default Re: Jiminii's Viewpoint on LRH's Philosophy (In easily understood language)

    Quote Posted by Chinaski (here)
    Quote Posted by jiminii (here)
    Ok so we start with what we are ... so we need some definitions for this

    tone scale is an arbitrary number of the emotions of a spirit from minus 40 to plus 40

    https://projectavalon.net/forum4/atta...1&d=1371308378

    hi Jiminii,

    curious: how is one's tone deduced accurately from this, as you say, arbitrary system?

    is it true that Hubbard wanted to ban "low tone" people from mainstream society? i think I recall reading this in a book called 'Inside Scientology'.

    what's your take?
    I think what he was saying was low tone people will pull the society down ... and if they were separated from society until they could be processed it would be better ... since the pain that is pulling their tone level down can not be removed until they go back to that moment in time and vanish the incident ...

    jim

  29. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jiminii For This Post:

    Mike (16th June 2013), soleil (19th June 2013)

  30. Link to Post #16
    United States Avalon Member johnf's Avatar
    Join Date
    11th January 2011
    Location
    Oregon, USA
    Posts
    1,211
    Thanks
    8,460
    Thanked 6,373 times in 1,116 posts

    Default Re: Jiminii's Viewpoint on LRH's Philosophy (In easily understood language)

    No matter what the group is was or will be that has come here and turned into a religion,
    philosophy, government, or book of the month club, it is part of the greater shared reality.
    I think every particle that exists, has the finger of every being everywhere on it.
    We all have a say.
    We all have the choice to percieve, decide how to respond, and that feeds back into the creative loop.
    So, are you going to participate in the prison planet idea?
    Are you going to participate in the happy Game idea?
    Perhaps the original idea was blissfull , playfull, adventurous creation.
    Then we wanted more challenge, more excitement, and things got more solid, more real seeming.
    The LRH philosophy is just one angle on this, maybe it is directly connected to Hinduism, or budhism , or maybe not.
    I look at everything Jimini posts as tools that I can use to expand my awareness.

    One thing I do with it is to further remove my own identities which which no longer serve me.
    Actually I find that to be My basic purpose as I understand it today.
    And I look, have looked at a lot of teachings.
    It is not easy to keep it simple ,and acknowledge the actual complexity of the REAL universe, but maybe we ARE up to the task.

    jf

  31. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to johnf For This Post:

    conk (18th June 2013), hohoemi (6th September 2013), Kraut (15th June 2013), thunder24 (15th June 2013)

  32. Link to Post #17
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    11th May 2013
    Location
    asia
    Age
    80
    Posts
    2,065
    Thanks
    1,980
    Thanked 10,011 times in 1,932 posts

    Default Re: Jiminii's Viewpoint on LRH's Philosophy (In easily understood language)

    Quote Posted by johnf (here)
    Jim,
    Your avatar is reversed, Thunder24 has pointed this out to me, and I have just realized.

    Meteyya In Jim.

    Is that A LOL or what.

    Either way, it is a KOAN to comtemplate. Jim In Meteyya, Meteyya in Jim.
    Or for Anyone, Iam part of the All, and the All is in me, that sort of thing.

    jf
    right .. I fixed that .. I am one of the viewpoints of metteyya ... means I am created out of that spirit
    the 3 that I know about is LRH ...and Siddhartha Gautama ... Buddha ..and me ..... I ran all of LRH's pictures at the Flag Land Base and I ran all of Siddhartha's pictures in thailand
    Siddhartha is still on this planet .. LRH is not .. he want back to the future where he and I came from created new out the static of Metteyya and trained to do these missions
    his was a different mission than mine

    jiom

  33. Link to Post #18
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    11th May 2013
    Location
    asia
    Age
    80
    Posts
    2,065
    Thanks
    1,980
    Thanked 10,011 times in 1,932 posts

    Default Re: Jiminii's Viewpoint on LRH's Philosophy (In easily understood language)

    from my viewpoint what we did from the 1st run worked ... we won .. but we are doing the second run now ... this time has already happened ... we are created new out of the static .. but this time we have no automatic recording memory ... that will have all these booby trapped hypnotic commands in them ... so it doesn't matter where we put all these new millions we sent back here .. into any religion ... they are new spirits (actually viewpoints created from spirit to manage these bodies), out of source with no experience ... starting new so all their powers can open up natural maybe even by accident like mine did ... they will be closer to the truth too ... coming straight out of the static ... and they WILL align the planet ... and we are watching too from the future so see how this turns out too.

    jim

  34. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jiminii For This Post:

    johnf (15th June 2013), soleil (19th June 2013)

  35. Link to Post #19
    United States Avalon Member johnf's Avatar
    Join Date
    11th January 2011
    Location
    Oregon, USA
    Posts
    1,211
    Thanks
    8,460
    Thanked 6,373 times in 1,116 posts

    Default Re: Jiminii's Viewpoint on LRH's Philosophy (In easily understood language)

    Quote Posted by jiminii (here)
    from my viewpoint what we did from the 1st run worked ... we won .. but we are doing the second run now ... this time has already happened ... we are created new out of the static .. but this time we have no automatic recording memory ... that will have all these booby trapped hypnotic commands in them ... so it doesn't matter where we put all these new millions we sent back here .. into any religion ... they are new spirits (actually viewpoints created from spirit to manage these bodies), out of source with no experience ... starting new so all their powers can open up natural maybe even by accident like mine did ... they will be closer to the truth too ... coming straight out of the static ... and they WILL align the planet ... and we are watching too from the future so see how this turns out too.

    jim
    Got ya. For me though I have to wonder if The LRH project is the only one.
    Also I am not so sure the special powers thing is all that helpful.

    We can create without energy, without personalities, (a theory).
    If we be the simplest I we can, the waves of optimum outcome just emanate out of us and
    lighten up the apparencies around us.
    No beams , no excess thoughts just gentle asisness, with enough Is on it to cause an effect.

    I have studied a lot of stuff besides LRH, etc, and Sometimes I think it is the same stuff just said different ways.
    Maybe where I finally wound up before being recreated was just a bunch of points in space thinking all in unison, something like, Well that was refreshing.
    There would in a true happy ending be no isms, no ologies or anities, all would be in perfect agreement with nothing.
    Maybe one big being, maybe in some sense an infinite number.

    (Now this next part is from the joker and degrader in me)

    Then some bonehead would go let there be light!
    And we would all do a facepalm, and get back to work.
    There is allways one of em ya know.

    jf

  36. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to johnf For This Post:

    CD7 (16th June 2013), Kindling (20th June 2013)

  37. Link to Post #20
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    11th May 2013
    Location
    asia
    Age
    80
    Posts
    2,065
    Thanks
    1,980
    Thanked 10,011 times in 1,932 posts

    Default Re: Jiminii's Viewpoint on LRH's Philosophy (In easily understood language)

    Well I started out being born in Utah ... had a horse and a dog ... and they were my best friends ... I never had an argument with my horse or my dog ... but some of those around me were trying to teach me this unnatural way of communication with words that don't show true feelings ... and after I started to learn these words I started to realize they only wanted me to learn them because they didn't have enough people to argue with ... so after I learned the words I have been arguing ever since.

    so it was more fun for me to live true with the animals ... and those days were innocent ..I never stayed home my mom was in this kind of system .. maybe she got it from her parents .. wanted me to take naps ... so I would sneak out of the window and cross this super highway to go play with my friends ,... then suddenly I see my mom on the other side ... she looked like she was in some kind of panic ... throwing her arms out like she didn't want me to move or something ... and came running across the street and almost got hit by a car herself ... and grabs me by my hand ... and I had only one way to defend myself

    I just looked up and said, "mom you can get killed crossing the street like that." ..

    she looked down at me in surprise and said, "uh .. yeah"

    so I really had problems to educate my parents and get them to loosen up a bit ...

    just thought I was a cowboy from Utah ... but after 4 1/2 years old .. things started to change ... little miracles happened ... and I could tell you some but ...
    something definitely changed ... the speed at what I could learn things ...

    you see I fell out of a tree and landing on my face ... and broke my nose .. so the nose wasn't set right and this gave me hay fever ... so the doctor had me on a milk bread diet trying to find out what my allergy was ...
    I learned it years later ... met a chiropractor who could look down your body and tell you everything that was wrong with no x ray .. he could see auras .. and he said, "who broke your nose and didn't reset it right .. you got hay fever don't you"

    well this wasn't going to save me at 4 1/2 years old ... I was dying ... and my dad said I was so skinny that I was like bones ... so he ordered my mom to feed me and I got ok in a week

    but the spirit that was in me left and Metteyya entered the body ... I didn't know this at the time ... and in fact I never suspected I had anything special ... somehow the powers turned on because of some Buddhist chant I tired on Hollywood blvd
    and the miracles happened from then on .. one after another ... so then I had to study it ... my thoughts were happening one after another and both good and bad where happening and it was getting dangerous ... so I found the book Phoenix lectures by LRH that taught me how to control my thoughts .. but metteyya ..???... I studied the book and thought ANYONE could do it if they practiced like me ... but .. I had NEVER been able to get another to do it ...

    and I would find out the why only a few years ago in spring 2011 ... why it took so long?

    jim
    Last edited by jiminii; 15th June 2013 at 20:19.

  38. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jiminii For This Post:

    soleil (19th June 2013), Swanette (20th June 2013)

Page 1 of 4 1 4 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts