WADE FRAZIER : A Healed Planet

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

I have been very busy on my “time off.” This morning, I was reading about a new movie that is making waves:

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/the_act_of_killing/

As another test of our propaganda systems, I am going to see if any reviewer mentions that the USA was largely responsible for the slaughter of those people:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/lies.htm#suharto

So far, the only review that I have seen that mentions Chomsky is a student news site:

http://www.leedsstudent.org/2013-07-...act-of-killing

and even it does not mention how the USA was largely responsible for Suharto’s coup and its aftermath. Suharto was responsible for three genocides during his reign. That purge was only his first, with the genocides in East Timor and Papua New Guinea the other two, and Suharto was our staunch ally the whole time, with the USA giving him arms and assistance, including “diplomatic,” so that the West never heard of the crimes while they were happening. So far, I have not seen any of the reviews that even mention the USA’s complicity in that holocaust. It is kind of surreal.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

I was just talking with somebody about this issue: that situation in my previous post of the movie reviews failing to mention the USA’s complicity in that holocaust has everything to do with the FE conundrum. It is a piece of the puzzle, and helps explain why my mother created a scrapbook of the lying articles about us, and took it on tour to my friends and family:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post400492

Understanding how the media really works helps gain an understanding of how the world really works. Understanding how the world really works is vitally important in getting an FE effort going that may have a chance of success, but the obvious delusions need to be set aside. Otherwise, newbies think that the inventor of the hour has a chance, that Godzilla can be snuck past, or that if we all tell our friends and family about FE, then we will get The Muppet Movie ending in short order.

It has taken me a lifetime to arrive at my state of awareness, and nothing about it was easy. Manifesting the fifth epochal event in the human journey:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post696307

is not going to be easy, but it also may be the only thing that will prevent our self-extermination as a species, while taking most of complex life with us.

I was also recently discussing those other epochal events. None of them was initiated with some kind of mass action. Learning to maintain a fire probably happened one time, and other proto-humans eventually learned to do it. The advances in stone tool technology probably happened once, and were later copied. The same probably goes for sewing, the invention of the bow and arrow, and so on. While the domestication of plants and animals happened in several places across the planet, apparently independently, in each instance, the domestication events probably happened once, and then were copied.

In each case, it took one or a few people to make the breakthrough, and then it spread. FE will be the same way, but the problem is far larger and more complex than inventing the bow and arrow.

Also, in each instance, it was a cognitive breakthrough that initiated the change, but the energy regime change that it initiated allowed for cognitive leaps in the people who enjoyed that energy regime. I think that it will be the same way for manifesting FE, and that is the approach that I am taking – the enlightenment approach. A few will become enlightened enough, first, to make the breakthrough, and the new energy regime will enable the rest to make the cognitive leaps.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Not much to say these days, other than that I am working on the essay and doing other chores. One thing that I would like to touch on today is something that I have been noticing lately more than usual. It is not easy to understand how the world really works. Part of the reason is that the people running the world do not want people to understand, so that we can be controlled and exploited. That part is kind of like a constant, and there is really not much that can be done about it these days, other than to stop listening to the indoctrination machine.

The other part is within our control, and is by far the most important part. It is how we approach the issue of how the world works. I know that I am like a broken record on this issue, but I have seen that it needs to be reinforced, because we are all trained from the cradle to think like victims. If we put aside Black Science, covert action, and other “conspiratorial” topics for a moment, let’s just concentrate on the “whiter” areas. The ideal of White Science is a worthy one, or the ideal that a courtroom is where the truth is determined and where justice is dispensed. I think that we all know that White Science and courtrooms fall short of their ideal, but what about them gets it right, or at least points in the right direction?

Ideally, anything that White Science accepts into its framework is something that produces tangible evidence that can be independently reproduced. Courts have chain-of-evidence procedures to ensure that evidence is not tainted before being presented. White Science has a necessary skeptical component to it, where any evidence or theory is subject to scrutiny. Subjecting new evidence or theory to rigorous investigation, debate, and deep thought is a vital component to any science.

Karl Popper is a leading figure regarding the philosophy and process of science, and he got his start by listening to Albert Einstein talk about his own theories, and agreed with Einstein that scientific theories could never really be confirmed, but only falsified:

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/popper/#Lif

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Po...ther_criticism

As Einstein said, all theories are false, in that they do not totally depict reality. One of Einstein’s famous statements is that every theory is eventually killed by a fact. A scientist’s discrimination and innate skepticism toward any theory is a necessary component of the scientific process. That is the ideal, but far too often, scientists, as with any humans, can fall prey to their point of view, and as Planck said, science progresses funeral by funeral:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy.htm#real

But that skepticism and critical awareness is vital in sorting out the chaff from the wheat, and the fringes are almost all chaff. I readily see, over and over, how non-scientists seize on something that appeals to their framework and they erect their awareness around it, but the object of their obsession is not valid, but is that chaff that is constantly purveyed from all corners.

A recent example is all of that conspiracist garbage that was sprayed across the fringes within days of the Boston Marathon bombings. Whether the Boston Marathon bombings were some kind of false flag operation is an open question to me (but I lean toward the Young Warrior’s Disease explaining it, and if they were “inspired” by the genocidal activities of the USA in Iraq and Afghanistan, their ire is certainly understandable), but all of the allegations that happened immediately after the bombing, such as nobody was really hurt in the bombings, but they were all actors, is conspiracism at its worst, and leading conspiracist figures were guilty of promoting such disinformation. If we approach an event like the Boston Marathon bombings as a scientist would, we would gather evidence, test theories, be skeptical of all explanations, and see where the evidence leads us. That is not what happened, but all kinds of wild allegations, allegations that quickly became seen as false, ricocheted around the Internet and in conspiracist forums within days of the bombings. Those who jumped on the “they were all actors” and similar bandwagons lost all credibility with me.

I looked at the evidence for the JFK assassination for more than a decade before I had anything to say publicly about it:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/cover-up.htm#wean

and I am sure that my writings about what Gary Wean saw helped lead to his testimony being in recent serious JFK books. If I had to write that essay again, I am not sure what I would change all that much about it.

The trick is to lay aside preconceived notions, both the orthodox theories and the fringe ones, and see where the evidence takes us. That is far easier said than done, but it is the ideal. And when a piece of fringe evidence falls apart on further inspection, it is prudent to heavily discount it and even reject it outright, and the burden of proof should fall back on the claimant. The moon landings issue is one area where I did a deep dive, and none of the fringe evidence held up to scrutiny:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/cover-up.htm#apollo

But I still see the moon landings being kicked around like there is some merit to the arguments that they were faked. I never got Brian over the hump:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#apollo

but that was because he did not take the time to really get familiar with the evidence and arguments. If he had, he would have not had much “skepticism” whether the moon landings happened or not.

Time for chores.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

I need to reiterate my approach and what I am interested in, and not interested in. I keep seeing, over and over and over, newbies to this stuff (people can be aware of this milieu for twenty years and still be a newbie, because they have no experience in the field) who think that they have some new approach that has never been tried before and that they have the magic answer, or they think that they have solved the problems of why other approaches have failed. Virtually every time that I have seen that phenomenon, it has been the person’s ego talking, a person with absolutely no experience in the field or anything close to it. There is nothing else like the FE milieu on Earth, and newbies constantly project their conventional awareness on the issue, and think that the standard stuff will work. That is one of the most fatal delusions in the field.

The primary reason why we do not have FE and heaven on Earth is that personal integrity is the world’s scarcest commodity, which was the primary lesson of my journey. It was the lesson that I resisted the longest, until I had it pounded into my head in no uncertain terms:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#burn

Every other reason is a distant second place, but almost nobody wants to acknowledge that grim state of affairs. Joe Average is not a dark pather:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/spirit.htm#serving

Joe is living a life of quiet desperation, eking out a living and temporarily sating his addictions. Joe does not want to hurt anybody if he can help it, and he really does not want to help anybody too much, either. He is just shuffling along. There is divinity in Joe somewhere deep down, but in a world of scarcity, Joe is ruled by his fears. Joe’s only participation in making FE happen is being willing to use an FE machine if somebody delivers one to his door. Dennis actually made an awesome strategy around that understanding:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#sfs

although he did not think of it in those terms when he came up with it. The strategy was so brilliant that he was wiped out with extreme prejudice, and nobody has even tried it since. I have helped the best of the best try to crack this nut, and what learning experiences those were.

But newbies refuse to acknowledge those lessons, largely because they are so at variance with their experiences. But none of them have ever been in a field where contenders are offered a billion dollars to go away:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#offer

before they get the boom lowered on them. FE is not a business opportunity, another New Age flavor of the day, or something for The Occupy Movement to get behind. FE represents the fifth epochal event in the human journey, and would be by far the largest:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post693557

and Joe Average will be no help at all in initiating it. In fact, no group currently existing on Earth is going to be much help. Virtually all have been trapped by the scarcity-based teddy bear(s) of their choice:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#dominant

and Godzilla and friends are vigilant in making sure that all attempts toward FE and abundance are taken out, and so far, they are batting one thousand.

After surviving various approaches, I decided to try something different. But I know that there is no audience on Earth that is ready for it, not in that they will really understand and help. For those whom my message reaches in something approaching fullness, it is guaranteed that there will be virtually nobody in their lives who will also understand. I am looking for needles in haystacks.

It is natural for newbies to think that they have something new and exciting to bring to the table, but I have yet to see it. I constantly see the same naïve and inexperienced suggestions, with the proposers thinking that they have got it figured out. To reiterate for the hundredth time:

1. Godzilla is alive and well, if currently fragmented (http://www.ahealedplanet.net/journey.htm#cabal);

2. Godzilla is not asleep, nor can he be snuck past (http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level7);

3. Today’s inventor of the hour is like a lamb to the slaughter, totally oblivious to the fate that awaits him; many have appeared and disappeared over the generations, and I no longer have any interest in them, as far as thinking that their approaches offer any hope;

4. Any mass movement effort toward FE has always played to some kind of self-serving lowest-common-denominator, as with all politics, and in the FE field, those are fatal flaws, readily exploited by the predators;

5. There is not a group on Earth that has shed the scarcity-based ideology of its choice, which is why none of them are fit to pursue FE and abundance;

6. Joe Average will not begin to wake up via talk, but by having FE delivered to his home.

7. The members of choir that I envision are not going to be talking up their friends, families, and associates – we will be reaching higher and wider than that.

One of the most common observations, when people begin to glimpse the issue, is that Joe Average is not ready for FE and abundance. Well, is he ready for self-extermination? That is the trajectory that Joe Average is on these days, with Godzilla stampeding the herd toward the cliff:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post646907

As with the other epochal transitions, it was up to a relative few to get the ball rolling (invent and develop the new energy regime), and then Joe eventually jumped on the bandwagon. Anything short of delivering an FE machine to Joe’s house is not enough, because it does not achieve the new energy regime. The new energy regime can transform Joe’s mentality from scarcity to abundance. I highly doubt that Joe is going to wake up via any other way, and I am looking for those few who can wake up before FE is delivered to their homes. They are only a relative handful on the planet today, but those are whom I will be looking for. They will thirst for the truth and go chasing after it, not waiting for somebody to deliver it into their laps.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

A few odds and ends as I plunk along on the essay…

One of the odd things about energy, be it conventionally-recognized energy, free energy, new energy, or what have you, is that scientists don’t really know what energy is. Science can only describe its effects.

Richard Feynman made that statement long ago:

“It is important to realize that in physics today, we have no knowledge what energy is.”

http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Richard...ics_.281964.29

Werner Heisenberg made a similar observation:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy.htm#heisenberg

On a note related to my previous post, a major delusion that newbies need to shed is the idea that if people see a working FE prototype, then it is a downhill racer to FE. Working FE prototypes have been demonstrated many times, from Sparky Sweet and Adam T. to Moray, Gray, and Reed. Demonstrating an FE prototype at best gets gawkers from the masses (and “allies” who want to steal it), and it also gets Godzilla’s keen attention. Then the ride for the inventor can become rather rough, let us say.

There is a mountain of data on Dennis’s heat pump:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#new

and there are many installations that still operate, many more than thirty years after they were installed. Anybody with any gumption can go see them in the field, and meet customers who would defend their heat pumps with their lives, as they saved them so much money over the years. But other than Dennis taking salesmen and others on tours of installations, and the stray investigator (often looking to invalidate the technology), there is big, collective yawn from the masses and establishment. The Wright brothers were ignored and derided for five years after they first flew:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy.htm#wright

and anybody who wanted to could go watch them fly in broad daylight. There is a big delusion that the scientific and technical establishments are waiting with bated breath for the breakthrough technologies to make their appearance, so that they can develop them and make them for public use. Nothing could be further from the truth. They all have their collective heads in the sand, and they will never pull them out, short of somebody doing the equivalent of landing a plane in their front yards. FE, delivered to somebody’s home, that stops the electric meter, would be one of those events, and the biggest one of all time. But anything short of that is not going to generate much interest among the masses, be it either Joe Average or scientists sitting in their soft berths in academia and corporate slots. Those kinds of delusions need to be set aside if somebody is going to begin to understand the FE conundrum.

Best,

Wade

[Melinda]

I return with another long post. For what it’s worth, not because I feel I’m bringing new or needed information, but largely because writing helps me process my thoughts around the FE subject. Thank you all - for understanding.

Wade Frazier, Post 3023 : “As Einstein said, all theories are false, in that they do not totally depict reality. One of Einstein’s famous statements is that every theory is eventually killed by a fact… [portion missing] …The trick is to lay aside preconceived notions, both the orthodox theories and the fringe ones, and see where the evidence takes us.”

That reiteration of the importance of evidence reminded me of the work of Dr Judy Wood, who quotes this statement from someone who she says taught her well…
“Empirical evidence is the truth that theory must mimic.”
I understand this to mean that, whilst imagination (something she values) has its significant role, we can theorise based on what actual evidence is telling us, as a grounded place from which to begin our exploration of what is possible and not yet proven.

She writes:
“If you listen to the evidence carefully enough, it will speak to you and tell you exactly what happened. If you don’t know what happened, keep listening to the evidence until you do. The evidence always tells the truth. The key is not to allow yourself to be distracted away from seeing what the evidence is telling you.”
(Page between Foreword and Introduction, Where Did the Towers Go – Evidence of Directed Free Energy Technology on 9/11, by Dr Judy Wood - Published 2010, The New Investigation.)

A great deal of info on numerous subjects that could fall into Wade’s category of “conspiracist garbage…” (Post 3023) seems to come in the form of incomplete or refutable evidence; often delivered by people who appear to have drawn their conclusions prior to collating their evidence, based on their emotional response to events. When we do this, it can naturally determine what ‘evidence’ we will consider powerful or ‘truthful’ (I think Limor talked earlier in the thread about how people gravitate towards sources that resonate with their beliefs.) I understand this response, and I see it as a natural reaction we sometimes have in the face of traumatic events. It may be serving an emotional purpose as part of a collective voice that says “I feel I am repeatedly not told the whole truth about various events from mainstream or official channels.” But processing that frustration by emotionally reacting to worst case scenarios is one rung on the ladder of seeking truth, not a place to set up camp. How well do we honour truth when we cling to something that merely seems truthful because it is a story that paints oppressive forces in a conveniently bad light? Whilst oppressive forces may deserve accusations of ill-intent – those accusations clearly, repeatedly hinder our progress if they are littered with inaccuracy.

Dr Wood also touches on the significance of how we receive the evidence we consider; how the medium affects our perceptions:
“After spending weeks and months researching 9/11, I found a common pattern in people’s responses. It seems that the strongest influence on whether or not someone questioned the events came from how they first learned of them… [portion missing] …When I was growing up my family did not have a TV. I think this made an enormous difference in the reason I was able to see what I saw…”
(Page 2, Introduction, Where Did the Towers Go – Evidence of Directed Free Energy Technology on 9/11, by Dr Judy Wood - Published 2010, The New Investigation.)

In other words, what the news programmes’ interpretation was telling her was happening didn’t chime with what her experience and deductive abilities were telling her was probable. It conflicted with her intuition and reason as both an engineer and free-thinking individual.

It is easy for people to be persuaded by the limited perspectives prevalent in mainstream media if that is the world they find sanctuary in trusting. But equally, it is easy for us truth-seekers to consider ourselves immune to that brand of programming, and to welcome shaky evidence of conspiracy because we resonate with the source based on a shared feeling of being oppressed; a shared belief that our common oppressor would (satisfyingly) be threatened by the ‘findings.’ That’s clearly fodder for our emotional venting, but rarely sound enough to lay solid ground for more significant progress.

In relation to the questioning of conspiracies, I found Dr Wood’s approach reassuring. She advocates the method that rather than emotionally attaching to theories about WHO was responsible for what happened to the WTC buildings and why, we first need to establish exactly WHAT happened. That underpinning perspective was what drew me back to studying the events, through her work; like a light in the darkness that helped clear the emotional fog and some resultant hesitation around the subject. The tragedy of September 11th was so horrific, with so much contradiction and confusion between the official story and evidence / witness testimony, that her attitude towards focusing on the evidence was a navigation tool I could respect, enabling me to breathe more easily around it.

In Part 2 of her AMMACH interview she also raises the subject about advanced technology, unacknowledged in the public domain, and how we may be able to use evidence of its existence to move forward…
http://youtu.be/flw2rCjAkC4?t=18m46s 18mins45secs in:
“What I mean by Free Energy is it’s free, free for the taking, but you’re not stealing… Nikola Tesla… wanted to give free energy to the world but he was afraid it would be used for evil purposes. Been there, done that. We don’t have that risk anymore, it’s already been done. Until now, those who developed free energy technology in the secrecy of their basement have wound up suicided. The beauty of – if there’s any silver lining in this cloud from 9/11, is it was a demonstration to the entire planet that free energy technology exists… But think about it, now people can develop it in the light of day, as long as people are aware of that. [my underlining] Until now folks have had to take some blind faith leap that “Oh yeah, I think that person does whatever,” or go to someone’s lab and witness this. But with 9/11 the entire planet can know that free energy technology exists.”

I’m personally not qualified to say definitively if FE was used in the destruction of the World Trade Centre buildings (including building 7.) But I am deeply curious about what happened. I found those comments interesting because I don’t interpret them as public encouragement of a reckless, naively optimistic, attitude in FE inventors. I think Dr Wood is saying the potential is there for that disclosure to assist us in the FE field if enough people are aware of and fully understand the evidence in front of them (the same as if enough people cared enough to learn about Adam Trombly’s demonstration of his device to the United Nations… and I haven’t met any, except on this forum.)
The comment spoke to me not so much about attempting to awaken the masses (the pitfalls of which have been covered here), but more of how, if some of the worst fears of FE abuse have been realised already, all the more reason to conquer our fearful energy and explore the benefits of using FE creatively for harmonious, life-supporting purposes. And whether those of us already aware of FE consider the World Trade Centre events to be of use or not in even our private, personal processing of the energy situation, it seems to me that we’ve lived with the threat of virtually instant global annihilation since the open use of nuclear / atomic weaponry. The fact that, even after Chernobyl and Fukushima, the current, publicly acknowledged nuclear technologies are still presented by establishment voices as dependable energy sources would seem to contradict any establishment voices that would deplore FE because of its destructive potential.

I remember Brian O’Leary speaking of how certain individuals were afraid that a public FE culture would free the worst in our midst to use it for weaponry. But when considering that, the question for me keeps returning : what are we really doing if we keep letting the victims of an oppressive consciousness (who dwell in corridors of material power) bully us out of imagining the wonders they are incapable of visioning? At some point the creators within us have to relearn our higher potential – to reclaim our powers of positive manifestation. We have to sing a new range of healing frequencies onto our beloved planet to free her of her wounds. FE seems to me the technology that could potentially allow us to continue expanding our external creativity whilst demanding the least of our extraordinary mother earth.

In her book, Dr Wood speaks about the importance of open-mindedness with regards to the world around us, and how our breadth of imagination today can affect the world of tomorrow we invite into being. She remembers how she was ridiculed at school for suggesting people could live on the moon, only to be proved quite sound of mind a few years later when Armstrong and Aldrin walked on its surface. After recalling this she writes…
“Ironically, our “educational system” teaches us to limit our thinking as much as (or more than) it teaches us to open and expand it. I know that there are plenty of things that we’ve simply got to learn – but why it is that intellectual circumscription and imagination-denial have to go along with that learning is not only anathema to me but socially and culturally most, most counterproductive. Let us return to seeing the world as a child sees it, with wonder and with hope.”
(Page 477, Conclusions and Summary, Where Did the Towers Go – Evidence of Directed Free Energy Technology on 9/11, by Dr Judy Wood - Published 2010, The New Investigation.)

That last comment reminds me of the root cause of certain kinds of FE denial, and also of why ‘conspiracism’ is perceived the way it is on this thread and your website Wade. History is littered with conspiracies. But looking for the truth and coming across evidence of conspiracy in the process is not the same as succumbing to a mind-set of conspiracism. The difference as I see it being that if we are not careful it can drive us down rabbit holes, chasing our tails. It can lead to being stuck in a place of fear and permanent conflict with a perceived, often invisible enemy. That fear may not take the obvious form of a cold sweat and shivering set of hands – but rather have a more stealth-like influence, seeping under our skin so that our creative imagination is hindered, our courage paralysed, whist our appearance, even to ourselves, remains unchanged.

Far better to protect and to nourish our state of wonder. A feat that to my mind requires not timid denial and wistful naivety, but a steady strength of will - a disciplined awareness.
And above all, love.

[Ilie Pandia]

Posted by Wade Frazier (here)
There is a big delusion that the scientific and technical establishments are waiting with bated breath for the breakthrough technologies to make their appearance, so that they can develop them and make them for public use. Nothing could be further from the truth. They all have their collective heads in the sand, and they will never pull them out, short of somebody doing the equivalent of landing a plane in their front yards.
Wade

You can't be serious!!

I saw Obama giving a speech, and he clearly said: "If you have an alternative to the oil energy let me know and we will look into it as soon as possible!" (quote from memory...) He couldn't be lying on national TV, could he?

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Melinda:

In anthropology, there is a concept that it takes a long time, handling and examining the bones and artifacts of digs, as in years, sometimes many years, for the anthropologist to finally begin to understand what the evidence has to say. I think that it is a common issue in realms of scientific and other investigation, and it richly applies to the FE situation.

On conspiracism, there are great hindrances that come in many forms. One of the greatest is a product of our legal and media systems that have evolved, which are rooted in the long millennia of scarcity, violence, and victim-ness that has shaped the human journey. That pitfall is the predilection for finding out who the perpetrator of the “crime” was, to unmask them and punish them in the name of “justice.” For instance, the people who pulled off the JFK hit will likely never be identified, much less brought to “justice.” But most who get into the JFK evidence seem to be trying to solve the crime. Gary did:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/cover-up.htm#wean

but he was a professional detective, so he can be forgiven. But when conspiracists focus their efforts on unmasking the perpetrators (and if 9/11 was an inside job, for instance, the perpetrators are behind deep, deep cover, and I will agree with Chomsky that Bush, Cheney, Rummy, and the like would be suicidal idiots if they were directly involved), they tend to fall into the victim paradigm. IMO, the productive responses to JFK, or 9/11, for instance, is for those affected to ask themselves what their contribution to the situation was. That is what creators do. Victims try to finger the “culpable.” One response points the finger at us, and the other one at others. Very few of us ever really exercise “responsibility,” which has been a human theme from the beginning:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/war.htm#responsibility

On FE and its misuse, I have long advocated a global peacekeeping force of grandmothers to prevent the weaponization of FE technology (the means to prevent it exists today, in Godzilla’s Golden Hoard), until abundance begins to sink in, and people see how silly weaponizing it is, not to mention insane, etc. One of my favorite Greer quotes is when the weaponization and misuse objections arise, in knee-jerk fashion (Level 5 http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level5), Greer responds with, “The worst elements of humanity already have this technology.”

The crazy denial of FE, from virtually all corners, is mind-boggling at first. Brian had to have it shoved in his face for five years, as he played the Paul Revere of FE:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#revere

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#reactions

before he began to openly wonder if humanity was a sentient species:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#sentience

It was not until after I encountered Fuller’s work the next year:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/roots.htm#fuller

that I began seeing that all of those reactions were an addiction to scarcity.

I am personally unsold on the FE angle on 9/11, and the academic who has most promoted that theory also promoted the “actor” angle on the Boston Marathon Bombings. Could FE technology have been used to bring the towers down? I imagine so, but did it need to? That is a big subject that I don’t have the time or energy to pursue, but to me, the most productive reaction to 9/11 is that when Godzilla says “Jump!” that the American people don’t ask “How high?” 9/11 was used as the excuse to invade nations that did us no harm, and kill off several million people (mostly children), as we put our greedy paws on Earth's last easy oil and gas, and probably less than one percent of Americans even know or care.

To your coda, as I have stated repeatedly, the greatest triumph of Godzilla is making FE and abundance unimaginable, and to great swaths of the “educated,” and those who say that they seek solutions (such as environmentalists), it is actually worse than that, in that they see FE and abundance as the enemy. You really have to see it to believe it. The goal of my work is to simply make FE and abundance imaginable,

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/scarcity.htm

and to keep newbies from running into the meat grinder's maw.

On a related note, I regularly hear from pupils who go try to talk up friends, family, colleagues, and the public on FE, and if they are at it long enough, they always come back with, “Boy, that sure did not work!”

As I have stated, my goal at Avalon and in my future work is to help pupils get past those early levels (6, 7, 9, 10, 11):

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level6

I think that newbies need to explore those levels, if for no other reason than to eventually realize that I know what I am talking about. I did not just make up that list from my imagination, but from half a lifetime of engaging people on the subject, and trading notes with people such as Brian and Dennis.

Also, taking my word for anything tends to short-circuit the learning process. Direct personal experience is the best teacher, maybe the only teacher, but learning the lessons of the FE field can be life-risking behavior, and I have seen too many wrecked and prematurely terminated lives. I also have blood on my hands:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#journey

and don’t want any more. So, in areas where the pupils are in danger of risking their lives/careers/relationships, I do my best to get them to take my word for it, for the danger that they face. It rarely sinks in, with newbies scoffing at the peril, very similar to those eighteen-year-old men who are eager for the battlefield:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/war.htm#business

Those who do that, however, do not stay my pupil for long. I know too well what the risk is to human civilization and the ecosphere unless we embrace FE, and ASAP, but rushing out and “doing something,” when the standard approaches have been tried literally tens of thousands of times, and failed every single time, is that situation of fools rushing in where angels fear to tread. I don’t want any more shattered lives on my conscience, and am trying something that I never saw tried before, and some at Avalon understand, which is the most pleasant surprise that I have had in years.

Hi Ilie:

That proposal that I wrote with Brian:

http://www.brianoleary.info/Impacts.html

was Brian’s response to Obama’s entreaty. I had interacted with the DOE before:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy.htm#yull

and I really wondered what Brian thought that we would accomplish, but when Brian asked, I gave. I am a professional spear carrier, and carrying Brian’s spears, even today, is part of what I do. In fact, I have turned down recent opportunities to meet with some of FE’s biggest names, because they usually will want to hand me a spear, and I won’t be able to help myself from carrying it. I am like a breed of dog, like a retriever, who has it baked into my DNA.

When Brian asked me to help him write that proposal, one friend cited an Old Testament story where the potentate hosted a gathering of his rivals, and instead of a feast, he killed them all when he had them under one roof. He saw the Obama/DOE entreaty in the same way. The host murdering his guests has a long, august past.

The Yanomamö had a trick they called “Nomohori,” which was either inviting a neighboring village for a feast, or being the one invited, and at the appropriate moment, when everybody’s guard was down, to slaughter the “allies,” rape their women, and make them their “wives.” The invading Spaniards made the “host attack” a science as they conquered the New World:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/america.htm#exaggerate

I don’t know if the DOE and Obama had something like that in mind, but they had no shortage of people responding to their entreaty. I told Brian that even if our proposal was accepted, I did not plan on going to Washington D.C. I have no desire to end up like Mallove:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#portland

Casolaro:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/cover-up.htm#casolaro

Wilcher:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/cover-up.htm#wilcher

etc.

Time for chores.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Briefly, a few points. One of the most common obstacles that I see with understanding not only the FE conundrum, but also life on Earth, is people seizing on a facet of the issue, exalting it above the other issues, suffering from the tunnel vision that such a perspective brings about. Conversely, another problem is lumping all factors together, seeing them as all having equal importance. People with such perspectives tend to hack at branches and ignore the root.

There are at least three key categories of factors that determine human development:

1. Our genetic makeup;

2. Our conditioning;

3. Our extra-physical inputs (our “souls,” “God,” etc.)

All three have their impacts on how we turn out. I constantly see people whipsaw between those factors, seemingly unable to integrate them. Some see our issues as all genetic, while others see them as all conditioning, while others see them in strictly “mystical” terms. Those are all lopsided perspectives.

Our souls live on the astral plane, while sending out “fragments” of themselves to live on the physical plane. But the physical plane is where sh*t happens, and the best laid plans on the astral plane often go awry when the denseness of physical reality is encountered. Again, for those in physical reality, it is easy to question the wisdom of such a system, and wonder what, if anything, the Creator had in mind when physical reality was created. But here we are, and I think that we are here to make the best of the situation.

The nature/nurture argument of life form development goes way back, and no scientist worth his or her salt today denies that it is both. But scientists usually neglect that third input, which are the extra-physical factors. We are anything but blank slates. Organized religion has tried to stake out the extra-physical territory as its province, but in a world of scarcity, it has failed spectacularly, becoming just one more “ism” that is primarily concerned with amassing and guarding its temporal wealth and power.

Conversely, there is a tendency to throw it all in a big bucket, saying that they are all just factors, without ranking them. That is another delusion, and a good way to say it is that there are no hungry philosophers. Similar to Maslow’s Hierarchy of needs:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow%...archy_of_needs

if you don’t take care of the basics, the rest does not matter. I constantly see nearly everybody just assume the current energy regime and resulting economic pie that it supports, and all of their “economic” interest is in money, taxes, exchange and the like, which have literally no meaning at all in a world of abundance. The primary reason for that tunnel vision, as I see it, seems to be the egocentric blinders that people wear, which can be seen as their allegiance to the scarcity-based ideology(ies) of their choice:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#dominant

When people develop comprehensive perspectives, which necessarily have a scientific aspect to them, they can distinguish the forest from the trees, and will refrain from hacking at branches. At this time, the only way out of our mess that I can see is for humanity to manifest the fifth epochal event of the human journey:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post696307

Anything less is likely not going to cut it. As with the other epochal events, it was up to a small group of people to reach a new level of cognitive awareness, and they were responsible for initiating the event. Then others copied it, and in turn were transformed by the process. It is going to be up to a relatively small group of people to initiate the transition to the fifth epochal event. If there were ten like Dennis on the planet:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/lessons.htm#howmany

and they combined their efforts, or a hundred like Brian and me, or five thousand like Ilie, I think it would be enough to overcome humanity’s inertia and the organized suppression. The fifth epochal event will dwarf everything that came before it. We will become a Star-Trek-like civilization, in ways far beyond what Star Trek’s writers ever envisioned. But it will take the best that that small group can muster. That is my game, and we will see how it goes.

Best,

Wade

[Ilie Pandia]

Hi Wade,

Your previous post may some good points with me. I do struggle to integrate the factors you have mentioned into something that makes sense.

Most mystical material basically asserts that we are here on an individual quest and it's not necessarily our job to save anybody. We can do that, if we want to, and then we enter into the "messiah and his victims to be saved" game. I recall you even wrote some time back that perhaps is not your job to ruin this reality game that people are currently playing here, for whatever reasons.

I do struggle to understand this better, because it seems to me like I do want to save everybody and stuff free energy into their houses and make all better.

Another thing is the saying that: "outer reality is a reflection of inner reality". It is unclear for me to what extent that is true, but if it is, then trying to "fix" things in the world would be like trying to wash your face by scrubbing the mirror.

In other days I am almost convinced that the vast majority of humans (including myself) act a lot like automatons. With specific behavior patterns and emotional triggers that have been conditioned into me from an early age. My only good news about this is that an automaton asking itself "am I just an automaton?" may be on it's way to realizing he is not.

Ranking those factors an integrating them properly in a framework that makes sense still eludes me, but it is pretty clear to me that indeed there are no hungry philosophers.

[sdv]

Posted by Wade Frazier (here)
Hi:

Briefly, a few points. One of the most common obstacles that I see with understanding not only the FE conundrum, but also life on Earth, is people seizing on a facet of the issue, exalting it above the other issues, suffering from the tunnel vision that such a perspective brings about. Conversely, another problem is lumping all factors together, seeing them as all having equal importance. People with such perspectives tend to hack at branches and ignore the root.

There are at least three key categories of factors that determine human development:

1. Our genetic makeup;

2. Our conditioning;

3. Our extra-physical inputs (our “souls,” “God,” etc.)

All three have their impacts on how we turn out. I constantly see people whipsaw between those factors, seemingly unable to integrate them. Some see our issues as all genetic, while others see them as all conditioning, while others see them in strictly “mystical” terms. Those are all lopsided perspectives.

Our souls live on the astral plane, while sending out “fragments” of themselves to live on the physical plane. But the physical plane is where sh*t happens, and the best laid plans on the astral plane often go awry when the denseness of physical reality is encountered. Again, for those in physical reality, it is easy to question the wisdom of such a system, and wonder what, if anything, the Creator had in mind when physical reality was created. But here we are, and I think that we are here to make the best of the situation.

The nature/nurture argument of life form development goes way back, and no scientist worth his or her salt today denies that it is both. But scientists usually neglect that third input, which are the extra-physical factors. We are anything but blank slates. Organized religion has tried to stake out the extra-physical territory as its province, but in a world of scarcity, it has failed spectacularly, becoming just one more “ism” that is primarily concerned with amassing and guarding its temporal wealth and power.

Conversely, there is a tendency to throw it all in a big bucket, saying that they are all just factors, without ranking them. That is another delusion, and a good way to say it is that there are no hungry philosophers. Similar to Maslow’s Hierarchy of needs:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow%...archy_of_needs

if you don’t take care of the basics, the rest does not matter. I constantly see nearly everybody just assume the current energy regime and resulting economic pie that it supports, and all of their “economic” interest is in money, taxes, exchange and the like, which have literally no meaning at all in a world of abundance. The primary reason for that tunnel vision, as I see it, seems to be the egocentric blinders that people wear, which can be seen as their allegiance to the scarcity-based ideology(ies) of their choice:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#dominant

When people develop comprehensive perspectives, which necessarily have a scientific aspect to them, they can distinguish the forest from the trees, and will refrain from hacking at branches. At this time, the only way out of our mess that I can see is for humanity to manifest the fifth epochal event of the human journey:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post696307

Anything less is likely not going to cut it. As with the other epochal events, it was up to a small group of people to reach a new level of cognitive awareness, and they were responsible for initiating the event. Then others copied it, and in turn were transformed by the process. It is going to be up to a relatively small group of people to initiate the transition to the fifth epochal event. If there were ten like Dennis on the planet:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/lessons.htm#howmany

and they combined their efforts, or a hundred like Brian and me, or five thousand like Ilie, I think it would be enough to overcome humanity’s inertia and the organized suppression. The fifth epochal event will dwarf everything that came before it. We will become a Star-Trek-like civilization, in ways far beyond what Star Trek’s writers ever envisioned. But it will take the best that that small group can muster. That is my game, and we will see how it goes.

Best,

Wade

Just a little insertion, poorly referenced at this time, that can be ignored in this awesome thread ...

Academic authors of textbooks always (often, at least) reference and justify Maslow's hierarchy of needs. Firstly, they are always ignorant of copyright implications (yes, we have to get permission to reproduce this diagram ...!). Secondly, they always ignore all the other research and work done by Maslow. Thirdly, they never question how 'great' people emerge from utmost poverty (basic needs not met but they still become educated and great transformational thinkers and agents of change) whereas many who have all basic needs met do no good, make no significant change, and sometimes do great harm to many, including themselves and their families.

Methinks that Maslow and his hierarchy of needs have been misinterpreted and misunderstood and he is cringing in his grave!

[sandy]

Hi Ilie,

The way I integrate and understand the 3 factors Wade mentions is through personal integrity. I try to remain self aware at all times and thus be conscious of my thoughts, feelings, and resulting actions, consistently and oh I wish, constantly. When I catch myself on autopilot again I reawaken and once again assess whether my behavior comes from fear or love. When I do this I can choose consciously the right action to take, as in the end it always does the magic, in not only taking care of others but me too!!

By the way Wade, I believe there are lots of hungry philosophers, but I would label them mostly, armchair philosophers.

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Ilie and sdv:

Big subjects you bring up, and I will do my best give some sort of reply. On us all having individual quests, Ilie, most mystical material that I am aware of also stresses that we are also all part of something bigger than ourselves. The message of the Infinite Spirit is that we are all one:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/spirit.htm#age1

In teachings such as Michael’s, Seth’s, Ra’s, and others, you will find ideas of entities comprised of more than a thousand souls, entities that give birth to universes, great tasks that certain groups of beings embark on (such as Wanderers), and so on. While you are responsible, in ways that can seem both obvious and subtle, for managing your body’s journey through your human lifetime, and growing your consciousness is the primary reason you are here, when you review your life when it is over, you will experience the impact of your earthly life by the impact that it had on every other consciousness that you ever interacted with, and you will experience their end of the exchange. Even people reacting to reading your words here are within your sphere of impact. So, how much of our journey is really an individual journey?

I believe that what I wrote earlier is that people may not want FE and what comes with it, and beamed down to the wrong planet. However, as my encounters with dolphins:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post511613

and UFOs:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/ufo.htm

demonstrated to me, they seem to like the idea of FE on Earth.

My understanding is that each person has karma, as do towns, nations, species, and planets. What is your role in your nation’s karma? Your species? Humanity has already driven countless species to extinction, and is in danger of really wrecking the apple cart. We can make this planet uninhabitable, and are well on our way to doing so. In the sometimes eerily dispassionate view of Michael, he observed that if we make Earth uninhabitable, those most responsible will incarnate onto the dying planet, to experience some of the karma, and those of us who still want to incarnate will likely find another life form that cannot manipulate its environment, in a different star system.

I am doing what I can so that there is a different outcome. And because I am here on the planet, I can make my choice and pursue it, although I had some “help”:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#voice

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#voice2

and after being touched like that, I have not found it easy to turn my back on all of it and just get fat and rich and hopefully die before it really hits the fan.

I think that it is obvious that our physical actions affect our physical world. Mystics far too often get ungrounded, and hunger and privation is a great way to bring us back to this reality.

I could write a lot more on this, of course, but am a little tired from a day of hiking.

Sdv, it is good thing that I don’t reproduce Maslow’s chart anywhere!

Maslow was one of many people who have seen how humans are wired, and if the basics are not taken care of, the rest does not matter. Humanity has still not mastered the basics. Fuller was not as hierarchical as Maslow was, but saw the issue as scarcity or abundance:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/roots.htm#fuller

The Michael teachings have been compared to Maslow’s hierarchy:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/spirit.htm#age

and there are certainly other frameworks, but in human development, if a child is not held when it cries, and is neglected or abused, by age two the child will be “ruined” as far as ever trusting anybody. While there are “superkids” who overcome amazing obstacles (Dennis is about the best example that I know of http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#dennis), of children that are subject to abuse and neglect, very, very few of them become transformational thinkers. Is it even one in ten million? Most become total messes. The path to FE and heaven on Earth I doubt will come from people who are starving, suffering severe privation, etc. These kids did not grow up that way:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post672748

I can only count my blessings of living the Ozzie and Harriet childhood, but I will certainly agree that it took my radicalizing experiences to see beyond the veil of our system. A person can get radicalized while starving, but radicalized in a loving way?

Those kids working in the cow pie factory in India:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post668457

likely do not have a prayer, as far as changing the world much. I could be wrong, but that is how I see it.

Sandy, what a beautiful little post. Thanks.

Time for bed,

Wade

[Melinda]

Ilie, Post 3030 : “...Another thing is the saying that: "outer reality is a reflection of inner reality". It is unclear for me to what extent that is true, but if it is, then trying to "fix" things in the world would be like trying to wash your face by scrubbing the mirror...”

Nicely put Ilie.

Feels to me like a continuous exchange... The inner world creates the outer world, and then what’s created in the outer world effects the inner once again... for example – my imagination thinks of building a nicer house, I effect the outer world by building it, living in it effects how I feel within, how I feel affects how I behave toward and in the outer world once again, etc. Once we access the extraordinary realms of our psychic ability, the denseness of the outer world compounds less separation anyway, and the distinction between inner and outer worlds becomes less clear. We can move objects with our minds, levitate and bi-locate. But it’s far easier to do these things in a world where we aren’t stifled by thoughts of survival, and, more significantly, in a world whose resources we haven’t guiltily sapped and destroyed – one we’ve spectacularly restored to a pristine and abundant condition because we created the technologies to facilitate it.

I love the world of books and of internet that enables us to share our lives and our dreams; the world of holistic, tech-assisted healing and space travel that enable us to rejuvenate and explore. And we can all of us have those outer-world things if we can create the technology to enjoy them sustainably. A healed outer world where we cleanse the karma of the damage we’ve done can affect our inner world immeasurably, and wisely-applied FE technology can not only open that door for us to heal ourselves and our planet, but expand our creativity in extraordinary and benign ways. It is both a huge responsibility and also a tremendous, world-reconfiguring opportunity. It brings me joy, time and again, to imagine its great potential for all, at its broadest and brightest.

SDV, Post 3031 : "...Thirdly, they never question how 'great' people emerge from utmost poverty (basic needs not met but they still become educated and great transformational thinkers and agents of change) whereas many who have all basic needs met do no good, make no significant change, and sometimes do great harm to many, including themselves and their families..."

I often wonder about the points SDV touched upon (hello SDV), because I find it a deeply significant aspect of the energy abundance discussion. Wade observed in response that those transformational thinkers and agents of change who excel in spite of their poverty are in a minority. Their existence gives me a deep gladness – because they are a reminder to any scarcity-based thinkers that those of us born into poverty are not inherently inferior; that God is not blessing the rich with more talent and superior skill – abundance is simply making it easier for them to attain those rewards. I knew a private school art teacher many years ago who said she was reluctant to teach in the private sector because she thought the children would be arrogant and uninspired (I think “spoiled” was the term she used.) What she found instead though was that it was easier to teach them because they had more support for their endeavours at home. In other words, they had not been led to believe that studying art was a waste of time, and their parents were not so pressured by poverty and the need to survive day to day that they had no time or energy to support creativity for healing’s sake. Abundance had given them that nourishment.

It’s true that a lot of the people who materially have the most in this world are also responsible for selfishly doing a lot of damage to others. But I don’t see them as a flawless example of what can happen with abundance because they are still reacting to their abundance within a scarcity-riddled framework. I think if you acquire abundance within a scarcity-riddled framework the chances are you had to exploit people and/or the environment to do it. With that burden can come a great deal of guilt, even if it is unconscious. People may not give the appearance of that guilt, they may be in denial of it, but it can manifest as an insatiable greed, a fear of never having enough, or a fear of having it taken away by those who might seek revenge. That is a fear-ridden existence, not a truly and wholly abundant one. The more they are aware of how the world could resent them, the deeper into self-hate or denial they can go – merely exacerbating their ill-behaviour.

However... take those uncommonly wealthy people and the adults whose poverty they exploit back to infancy and place them all in a world of universal abundance and then you might know how their values and characters would grow quite differently with an entirely different and shared perspective of what equal wonders were possible. But I’m not aware of us ever having had, in recorded history, that universal abundance which made all people economically equal – so what frame of reference do we truly have for how people react to that abundance? Again it seems to come back to the core of Wade’s intention, which is to make that abundance imaginable. If we’re of the mind-set that it has been known on some level before, in past lives or other dimensions, then perhaps it is a matter of imagining it again, or remembering it. Either way – the canvas is glistening, ready to be filled with a vision of equality unlike the last few thousand years on earth.

Wade Frazier, Post 3033 : “...My understanding is that each person has karma, as do towns, nations, species, and planets...”

This reminded me of something said by Anastasia in book 3 of the Ringing Cedar series, The Space of Love. She said that she has more admiration for people born and raised in cities who stay in their cities and clean them up, than she does for people who abandon them to go live in isolation in the beauty and nourishment of nature. (She also acknowledges how they have had it much harder than her, because they were not born into the untarnished cradle of God she calls home, but a far less nourishing place – and that cradle to which she is referring may have personal-spiritual aspects, not solely environmental-material ones.) I’m not making this reference to personally criticise those of us who make the choice to leave the crime-riddled, smog-filled worlds of oppression behind (I am tempted virtually every day of my life and possibly remain where I live for selfish reasons.) Sometimes removing ourselves from those grey environments is the only thing that enables us to survive and restore ourselves to a loving state of use to both ourselves and others. How it pans out spiritually is likely connected to the purity of our intention. But what Anastasia is described as saying in the book made me think of our responsibility to our world, to our nation, to our town, to our neighbourhood. How, in certain cases, we mend ourselves by mending the world around us – some by living a more removed and natural way of life (like the Darrens of the world), and effecting things remotely - and others by remaining in the thick of things, for their own karmic or dharmic reasons. Either way, an awareness of our responsibility to the whole brings us one step closer to creating the world where we can all live well.

Ever glad to be here, where people care enough to explore these things.

Wishing blessings for you all

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Melinda, that was a nice post. Yes, pockets of relative abundance in a world of scarcity are not the same thing as a world of abundance. Carl Sauer remarked how false the current “abundant” ideologies, born of Europe’s conquest of the world, are:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/america.htm#carl2

When the USA really began going into full genocide mode as it stole North America from the Indians, it concocted Manifest Destiny ideology:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/america.htm#steal2

It was a classic case of cognitive dissonance, where positive cognitions were fabricated to cover-up the negative cognitions that were so abundantly obvious. That ain’t abundance.

The criticisms made by the the Peak Oilers, calling various attitudes “cornucopianism,” “exuberance,” and the like:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/abund.htm#exuberance

are not so far off, but they cannot conceive of abundance, either. To see how false abundance in a world of scarcity works, see today’s NBA stars or lottery winners. They piss it away as fast as they can, with most around them only too happy to piss it away with them. In a world of abundance, you don’t get the world dancing to your tune while the money lasts. Money does not mean anything in a world of abundance. In a world of abundance, everything changes, and in ways that almost nobody on Earth today can even imagine. That is why I keep saying that I am only trying to make abundance imaginable at this time:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/scarcity.htm

However, people born into wealth have many advantages over those born into poverty. On a global and historical scale, I am immensely wealthy, even though I am nobody compared to Bill Gates. Today’s average American lives a vastly richer life than the world’s richest man of two hundred years ago lived.

On something rather mundane, the USA has usually dominated the Olympics, and their athletes are not state-sponsored, as they were in the Soviet Union or in China today. History’s richest and most powerful nation had many who had “spare” time to hone their skills and compete at a global level. I was a track athlete who competed alongside athletes who held world records and were Olympians, and their dedication to their sport was awesome to behold, and only in a rich nation like the USA could somebody devote most of their waking hours to it and not be supported by the state. Back when I was doing it, they did not really have much in the way of corporate sponsorship, either. Often, their support just came from their families and friends.

In rich pockets in the USA, the opportunities for the children are like night and day compared to the poor ones, and the rich kids are not just a bunch of trust-funders. Trust-fund kids rarely grow up, and the smart rich people do not just give their children everything. Often, in a faux abundant environment, the parents give their children “stuff” to fill the void that the children don’t get of love and attention, as the parents are out being rich and playing, or chasing more wealth. Dennis lived with the Eastern Oligarchy for a while, and it could get pretty sick, with the help calling their employers “master.” The West Coast does not work that way.

There is a great deal of dysfunction around wealth in a world of scarcity, and the so-called “vow of poverty” has been seen for a long time as some kind of enlightenment. Austerity is no way to live. How about a vow of abundance? And as becomes obvious when you are at it a while, global abundance is really the only kind of abundance that could ever be sustainable. All of humanity needs to be uplifted, not just pockets of people. Now, if people want to live in loincloths in the rainforest, that would also be their right, but in a world of abundance, nobody is going to want to do it. Again, in this world:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post672748

some chose to live in the wilderness, at least for a while. I am sure that I would spend time there. But when the entire world is readily available, who is going to choose to just stay in the forest their entire lives? I’ll bet that nobody in the world does.

Again, it is pretty easy to see how humanity’s ideas of justice, wealth, and the like have changed over the human journey. Hunter-gatherers are the most violent people in the human journey, with around a third of all men dying violently (the second epoch). When civilization began (the third epoch), slaves and professional soldiers appeared, and in the greatest empire of ancient times, people were forced to murder each other, for entertainment:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/war.htm#gladiator

Some might say that we have not advanced much since then, but chattel slavery and murder as entertainment are not institutions any longer. The rising standard of living made lives less cheap. Life is still very cheap in India, for instance, cow pies aside. A few years ago, a friend visited Southern India, and he flew home from Mumbai. He took a cab to the airport. He was not time-pressured, but the cabbie apparently thought that getting my friend to the airport quickly would earn him a big tip, so as he raced through the streets of Mumbai, he was literally running over people. My friend sat in the back seat, horrified. When they arrived at the airport, the cabbie just hoped for a big tip. The people that he ran over meant nothing to him. That kind of behavior would boggle the mind of a Westerner, but in a world of poverty, life is cheap.

Time for chores.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

A very challenging aspect of what I do is that time is short, and things are getting worse all around. I totally get it, but as impatience is my Achilles heel:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/spirit.htm#reading

and I have been on the FE battlefield, I am all-too-familiar with wanting to rush out and “do something.” I am finishing Radkau’s Nature and Power, one of many books that I read at the same time, and it is the first time that I have seen somebody else use my number: we are burning up fossil fuels a million times as fast as they were created:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/scarcity.htm#_edn6

Lately, I have been surveying the latest on fracking, Peak Oil, and the like, and it is all insane. Again, if there is any “good news,” it is that we will run out of fossil fuels before we get to 1,000 PPM carbon dioxide in the atmosphere:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post553228

and threatening a mass extinction that could also take out humanity. Already, the methane coming out of the permafrost in the Arctic is terrifying climate scientists, and is stirring up plenty of controversy:

http://www.cam.ac.uk/research/discus...shed-in-nature

But anybody with a clue realizes that humanity is using Earth as a big chemistry experiment, and the outcome could easily be catastrophic. The rate of rise in carbon dioxide right now is likely unprecedented in Earth’s history.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_...Past_variation

The oceans are undergoing unprecedented acidification:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean_acidification#Rate

This 2007 graph and projection is already out of date, as we have already reached 400 PPM (the slope continues to get steeper):

http://www.planetforlife.com/co2history/index.html

There really is no telling how it might play out, and that is what has scientists terrified. We are in a “race of the catastrophes” scenario:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post646907

and the surreal part is that FE can make it all go away almost overnight, and Heaven on Earth can be around the corner. But it is completely off the table of possibilities in virtually every energy conversation on Earth, and if people get past denial, which is extremely rare, they invariably think in terms of all the strategies that have ended in spectacular failure (6, 7, 9, 10, and 11):

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level6

As you can see on this thread, I am continually besieged by people stuck in those levels. It happens far more often than is evident on this thread, too. I am bombarded with people thinking that Godzilla can be snuck past, that he is asleep or dead, etc. It is like a broken record that I have had played at me for the past twenty-five years. Nobody has ever given the old college try for those strategies better than Dennis has, and if he can’t make them work, I do not know of anybody else on Earth with a prayer.

Time for chores.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

As I do my study and writing, and as I interact with Avalonians and people in my daily life, my perspective continues to evolve. I clearly recall my thinking when I was sixteen, and first dreamed of changing the energy industry:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy.htm#marry

and little did I know what I was in for. I saw some of how energy ran things back then, but nearly forty years later, my perspective has evolved in many ways. But in significant ways, my core perspective is the same. Energy runs our world in ways that I scarcely realized forty years ago. But as I became radicalized, I shed many false assumptions that I had about how the world worked. They were primarily assumptions that I was indoctrinated into. As I have looked back, I have seen how I had an opinion about something, such as energy running the world, and I eventually came to a new level of appreciation.

More than ten years ago, as I digested some of Fuller’s work:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/roots.htm#fuller

the paradigm that I had been groping toward finally crystallized for me. And what was behind the seemingly crazy resistance to even the idea of FE became clear to me. What I was seeing, and what Brian was seeing:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#reactions

were all reactions, in one way or another, to the idea of abundance, where people were projecting their assumptions of scarcity on it, unable to see it. Several years later, I wrote about that in paradigmatic fashion:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#dominant

I was just listening to an interview that I did with Scott a couple of years ago:

http://nexusnow.info/forum/showthrea...4879#post24879

It was the oral version of this part of my site for making FE happen:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/lessons.htm#stage1

and it reinforces what I came to realize just the other day: the choir can only happen when enough people have the paradigm shift from scarcity to abundance. I am constantly engaged by people who are stuck in scarcity, and when they give their objections to the idea of FE, or how they can make FE happen, they are always operating from scarcity-based assumptions. I have recently been encountering people who have been watching this milieu for many years, and when I would hear their ideas and reactions, I came to understand that they were all scarcity-based. When people are in scarcity-mode, their reactions are predictable on the FE issue, and none of them are productive. I either hear Level 5 fears:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level5

or the Levels 6, 7, 9, 10, and 11 bright ideas for how to make FE happen. I have come to conclude that only people who have made the shift are fit to be in the choir, as it will be an abundance chorus. If I let the song be one of scarcity, then it will be just like all the other singing that we hear out there. This really is something different.

I did not quite see it in such paradigmatic terms until just the other day, choir-wise. The choir cannot be comprised of people who think in terms of scarcity, as they will only sing the scarcity song. So, my work at Avalon, on my site, and elsewhere is to help people shed their scarcity-based conditioning. If they can do that, and can sing, then I will be seeking them out for the choir. Achieving an abundance-based perspective in a world of scarcity is no easy trick. It is another reason why I say that I am looking for needles in haystacks.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

I am replying to Limor’s post here:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post710767

as it is off-topic for that thread.

Hi Limor:

The “programming” analogy is a good one, as is our ability to rewrite the programs. That issue, and how humans are trapped by their programming, is what led people such as Brian O to openly wonder if we are a sentient species:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#sentience

I call us a semi-sentient species, where we all have the potential for it, but few really choose it. The mindless allegiance to scarcity-based ideologies:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#dominant

was the primary evidence that I saw, but I also saw that fear short-circuited their sentience. Fear/scarcity/victim and love/abundance/creator are two sides of the same coin. When we flip over to choosing love, then all the paradigms will shift:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#coming

but that is the hard part. I recently gave full examples of a future humanity that chose love:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post672748

and one that did not:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post672115

Love is the way out and always has been, but it ain’t easy in a world of scarcity and fear.

Here is my mystical mumbo jumbo of the day. I have written about my name, and how “wanderer” is one of the meanings, and I was called a wanderer when young:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...rer#post535283

I was just reading yesterday that the word “planet” comes from “wanderer” in Greek:

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/planet

So, ahealedplanet.net takes on new meaning for me.

I have been in conversations lately about my life’s work and why I do it. When you have a voice in your head, guiding your most fateful decisions:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#voice

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#voice2

it is hard to leave the path it set you on, even if you no longer want to hear the voice:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#voice3

and there are other reasons to do what I do:


1. It has a chance to help manifest Heaven on Earth;

2. It can help humanity avoid the abyss, while dragging complex life with us, and we have our toes over the edge today;

3. It beats watching TV.


When you have a voice in your head guide you into a situation where, a couple of years later, the people who run the world offer you a billion dollars to go away:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#offer

you get the idea that you are on some kind of special assignment. I was reading Inside the Other Side last night:

http://www.amazon.com/Inside-Other-S...the+Other+Side

which is the second book by that author that I have read (and I am now buying the third). Good stuff. In her latest book, she writes a chapter on fragments/souls on special assignment, and she calls them Mission Entities and Mystical Travelers. I have written plenty that I came in this way, and was groomed to be what I became from a young age (and my parents disowned me when I began to do what I came here to do), so I will not belabor it, but back to the choir idea: those in the choir will probably be primarily Mission Entities, Mystical Travelers, and the like. Again, different bodies of mystical material have different names for them, but the general idea is that they are on special assignment. They resisted the herd conditioning, or rejected it when they realized what a crock it was, such as those overgrown Boy Scouts:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paths.htm#scouts

while the masses hold on to their conditioning for dear life, as the paradigm that they were indoctrinated into defines them. As I have seen over and over, being willing to leave aside the scarcity-based conditioning really has little to do with “intelligence,” but just the willingness to let go of the lies that feed us.

Best,

Wade

[Robert J. Niewiadomski]

Wade,

First, I apologize if the following is out of This Place. If you think it is, then please, just ignore this post. I don't mind and I will understand No answer is the answer too I had to take this "bulge" outside of me... It should not dilute this thread further then...

OK, here it is:

Would whole (or part) of The Choir encompass (or result in side-project for) creating a computer aided Virtual Universe? A kind of place for setting up hands-on Planet-Labs simulations for people from around the world to interact. The energy issue would be the underlying aspect of all the activities and interactions between players and the environment in the game and through making/using inventions (including FE devices) people could play, learn and see how it is all about The Love/Free Energy Game (The Song)? With "sandbox" planet-labs at different levels of society development. Including those at Heaven on Earth level? A place accessed by computer interface in a shape of computer game. Wade, could it be possible to use your Energy Essay as a rule set for this "learning by play" open source group project (The Choir)?. I remember your remarks of sad encounters with open-source community That's really sad. But good thing is every body can go open-source We have many skilled people here at PA and in this thread...

It would all require using computer software at some or all levels. That's for sure. But software engineering is a small part of such projects. Compared to artwork, sound, music, in-game items, game-rules design, pure ideas of how this game could work, look sound and feel and quality assurance. Submitting and discussing ideas are most important parts. Computer engineers are like construction workers. First somebody wakes up at the morning with an urge to create something big. Then an architect takes that and put his pencil to the drawing board, then there are interior design specialists, next there are artists, the project managers plan the construction and in the end construction workers set up construction yard and put everything in place. It can be done by one person. On a small scale or it would take ages.

I want to be honest. I have experience of software engineering. 15 years professional, 20 total. But I have not participated in such big, distributed open-source projects. Especially network, simulation, computer games. But i want to and I have begun to observe, study and learn the inside workings of one particular OS project. With no deep diving or serious commitments yet... I am also working (slowly) with Betty Edwards, drawing course, book.

I realize it sounds BIG. About the size of The Choir

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Robert:

Yes, you are thinking big.

Another friend is trying to make a movie based on a world of abundance. People are trying different things, and I can’t say, “Don’t do them!”

But, I also am trying to get my message across as well as I can, and I know that I can make it better, hence the upcoming essay.

I can see down the road, something like that, but the way that I see it, the choir may “infect” ten times their number to “do something,” but I am not sure that I see either of those groups needing a VR playground. If the effort that went into making a VR playground went into making FE happen (nuts and bolts), that could be enough.

The way that I am currently envisioning my effort is:

1. Get hymnal made;

2. Build and train choir (5-10K people);

3. Sing;

4. Infect ten-to-twenty times their number;

5. Do something to make FE happen, on a technical end.

Maybe there is a place for VR in there, but not sure where. The VR may be something for the masses after FE is delivered to their homes, to help open their eyes.

Going to bed now.

Best,

Wade