Richard D Hall, The "Live" Ball and NO News Commentary...

[sigma6]

This is just too rich... and one of the reasons, why September Clues was one of my all time favourite 911 truth videos...

Really this is almost too rich... has anyone seen this page before?
http://www.welcomethelight.com/2010/08/911-truth-now/


Another link to same video (first link contains the September Clues video as well)

[Knowrainknowrainbows!]

Posted by sigma6 (here)
This is just too rich... and one of the reasons, why September Clues was one of my all favourtie 911 truth videos...

Really this is almost too rich... has anyone seen this page before?
http://www.welcomethelight.com/2010/08/911-truth-now/


Another link to same video (first link contains the September Clues video as well)

I had not seen this particular video or heard the researcher. I had been aware of "the ball" but no one else addressed it from a research perspective....
Thanks for posting this!!! I will share with others!!

KRKR

[sigma6]

It's stunning isn't it, a large 40 foot UFO shaped ball floats across millions of TV screens instead of what should have been a 747 and no one gets around to questioning it... without human memory (and the technology of video recording) it would have ceased to "exist"... if that doesn't make one think, than they would have to be prejudiced in some way, ie work for the MIC, of Media, etc... ie. they would be exposed.... Even on a simple curiosity level, how can you not say "WHAT THE HELL WAS THAT!!!!???" (LOL)

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Hey sigma. There is no 'ball' or UFO in this footage or any other on 9-11. Rich Hall cleared this up ages ago and admitted that his earlier analysis was incorrect. The video for that is here: http://www.richplanet.net/rp_genre.p...8&part=2&gen=2

(also we discussed this matter here): https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post559250)

[sigma6]

It goes to Hall's site, but no video is coming, it's in indefinite download mode....???

In any event, this shot was taken from live news television coverage. In the same vain as that news reporter who reported building 7 falling 20 minutes before it happened. Or the shot of the nose cone coming out the other side of the building.

Without being too cryptic, please give a brief summary of what was supposed to be there that you wanted me to see

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Try the above video again, it seems to be working now (although you have to sit through a short advertisement at the beginning).

[sigma6]

Watched it, Hall does an excellent analysis but it doesn't have anything to do with the ball, it provides one of the best speculations of how it might have been done. Assuming all the angles were genuine (in the sense that whoever took the photos actually took them) I'd add that it appears people were stationed at various locations, all respectfully far and at certain angles to maintain ambiguity.

But in a nutshell as he put it it was not a faked video of a CGI plane, but instead it was a real video of what appears to be a holographic image, thus explaining the lessor detail and all the video taken at a respectable distance away, the closer the angle got to see the plane impact the wall the farther away with the exception of the classic shot, the one (that should have maybe been deleted?) of the plane melting into the building...

If the Army radar in fact was a special vehicle designed to project a holographic image (I'll go with that...) It would still necessitate something to intiate an impact and explosion, besides just rigged explosions in the building. So the ball actually still fits quite well... It was recorded, it was accidentally run on a public news broadcast. And it was equally ignored by a blind MSM... None of Hall's angles included the shots that expose the underbelly, could they have been the doctored photos? Who knows, more food for thought.

Thanks for sharing... very informative. Hall does a brilliant job of integrating those 20 angles into one computer generated animation.

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Actually you should check out this show too: http://www.richplanet.net/rp_genre.p...2&part=1&gen=2

This is a follow up, and at about the 2 minute mark Hall explains that there may have been an incorrect assumption on his part regarding the flight path recorded by military radar, which is deliberately offset.

The point, in the initial presentation, was to illustrate that the multiple sequences/angles of footage we have available are not fake (ie CGI). The 'ball' footage was indeed the plane, or what is meant to be a plane. In clearer instances of this footage the wings are visible. But due to multi-generational copies of this poor, VHS footage, there was a reduced / distortion of the image resulting in a mere blob.

I do not believe it to be anything more than that. However, this does not necessarily mean that the planes that crashed into the towers were actual, physical aeroplanes (the same Boeing 757 and 767) that they were supposed to be. Personally, I still believe that they probably were. That is moot. Even so, this does not mean that they alone brought down the towers. Other factor/agencies were involved in the towers' collapse. For more info on that, check out this show: http://www.richplanet.net/rp_genre.p...0&part=1&gen=2

[sigma6]

hmm... just off the top I have never heard of multiple copies of video reducing images into round blobs... ??? Also my understanding as per September Clues, the "ball" was televised on National Television in a live broadcast, as was all the material they presented. Whatever it is, it does seem to be consistent with something in the neighbourhood of 40 foot wide object. It doesn't make sense to me that repeated copies would distort the image into a round flattened ball shape and reduce it in size?

But give credit to Hall for meticulously going over his work, correcting his interpretation, and sharing it with us... that is admirable, given the amount of extra work involved.

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

One of the main points of Hall's presentation was to illustrate and render in 3D the flightpath of the second plane drawing on every available piece of footage. The analysis shows that the flightpath of the alleged 'ball' precisely matches the position, altitude and trajectory of United Airlines Flight 175 when cross-referenced and triangulated with all the other footage, proving that the alleged ball is United Airlines Flight 175, a Boeing 767, which was simple captured from a bizarre angle in this instance. He has proven it.

I myself was just trying to illustrate that the image of the 'ball' is a pretty ropey one. It was recorded on VHS - taped from the live TV broadcast - (which immediately makes it a 2nd generation copy), then digitized and put on Youtube etc. Believe me, as someone who has used VHS equipment for many years, when you make a copy of a copy the image invariably suffers from degradation - what was once relatively clear and reasonably well outlined is reduced in clarity and definition. Thus the fuzzy shape of a 767 aircraft, far away in the distance, became the fuzzy shape of well, just a blob or ball.

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

From a distance, and viewed nose-on, aircraft wings seem quite thin, and blur almost into obscurity leaving just the fuselage, which is basically a cylinder, and a cylinder viewed head-on is just a circle.

VHS quality confounds the illusion as well. But watch this clip. This is probably the best available reproduction I can find of this sequence involving the ball. Watch it Full Screen, repeatedly, and in HD. Watch carefully! You can see the wings and even the engines of the plane just as it hits.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=1vAjBAKHCHE

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

After a bit of work I made a little GIF of the sequence using the superior footage above. I've slightly blown up the image and increased the contrast. The familiar form of a plane now becomes a lot more clear.