The Question of Lithium (Alchemy-dimensions-shapeshifters-aliens-existence-reality..)

[Mad Hatter]

Mad Hatter dons his semantics cap...

Now at the risk of incurring the wrath of one of his favourite posters -

Posted by Carmody (here)
Nothing would be the same.

I would humbly argue that post such an exercise it would not so much be a case of things having changed in fact they would be exactly the same as they always were, BUT, it would be your 'perception' of things that is inexorably and permanently altered and it is in that realisation one may glimpse a straw to hang onto to help balance out or anchor that new perception assuming one has the mental wherewithal, preparation and strength to grasp it as a reference point.

I do however understand the inference being made, the implications of which seem to indicate that those even vaguely capable of undertaking such a path would be well less than 1% of the entire population and of those not all will be adequately prepared.

This of course raises questions of the lateral kind (at least in my mind)...

If one subscribes to the idea that we are driving, albeit minus the manual, reality generating machines as well as the concept of their being a, shall we say, common consciousness then what are the implications of more people undertaking such an exercise so far as the manifestation of that common consciousness is concerned and the impacts that may have?

I'd best leave it a that for now as my brain is starting to hurt...lol

PS On another matter completely... earlier in the thread a paper was put up relating to states of matter (500 or so) which I found fascinating. I then ran into this -

[QUOTE]First of all, you wouldn't open up their hardware to find a CPU here, and a data bus there, and some kind of memory over there. Their hardware appeared to be perfectly solid and consistent in terms of material from one side to the other. Like a rock or a hunk of metal.

But upon [much] closer inspection, we began to learn that it was actually one big holographic computational substrate - each "computational element" (essentially individual particles) can function independently, but are designed to function together in tremendously large clusters. I say its holographic because you can divide it up into the smallest chunks you want and still find a scaled-down but complete representation of the whole system.

They produce a nonlinear computational output when grouped. So 4 elements working together is actually more than 4 times more powerful than 1.[QUOTE]


from here... http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ci...gobjects11.htm


Its the underlined bit that made me go hmm....

[Carmody]

The company making the gravity engine in the prior post appears to be this company

http://www.incobrasa.com/splash.html

Incobrasa Industries, Ltd. (Incobrasa), a privately owned corporation, operates a soybean processing business in central Illinois, trading soybean products in the domestic market. Its roots and experience in the industry go back about 50 years when its founders started operations in soybean oil extraction in Brazil.

Incobrasa began investing in United States farmland in 1982. In 1995, Incobrasa began the construction of a new crushing facility with a capacity to process 2,000 tons of soybeans a day. Soon after, Incobrasa entered the market with its major products: soybean meal, crude soybean oil and soy hulls, a by-product. Because of its high content of nutritionally valuable proteins, soybean meal has become an indispensable ingredient for animal feed. Soy oil is worldwide the most used edible oil for numerous food applications. The hulls are usually incorporated into other animal feeds.

The construction of a bottling and packaging facility was initiated in 2003 and it is now able to fill approximately 24,000 bottles per hour of ready to use soybean oil, commonly known by consumers as “vegetable oil”.

[Carmody]

I posted this information as a finished experiment, about 6-7 years ago on the net.

It took a bit of time for them to realize it.

The formula for turning cement into metal

LEMONT, Ill. – In a move that would make the Alchemists of King Arthur’s time green with envy, scientists have unraveled the formula for turning liquid cement into liquid metal. This makes cement a semi-conductor and opens up its use in the profitable consumer electronics marketplace for thin films, protective coatings, and computer chips.

“This new material has lots of applications, including as thin-film resistors used in liquid-crystal displays, basically the flat panel computer monitor that you are probably reading this from at the moment,” said Chris Benmore, a physicist from the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Argonne National Laboratory who worked with a team of scientists from Japan, Finland and Germany to take the “magic” out of the cement-to-metal transformation. Benmore and Shinji Kohara from Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute/SPring-8 led the research effort.

This change demonstrates a unique way to make metallic-glass material, which has positive attributes including better resistance to corrosion than traditional metal, less brittleness than traditional glass, conductivity, low energy loss in magnetic fields, and fluidity for ease of processing and molding. Previously, only metals have been able to transition to a metallic-glass form. Cement does this by a process called electron trapping, a phenomena only previously seen in ammonia solutions. Understanding how cement joined this exclusive club opens the possibility of turning other solid normally insulating materials into room-temperature semiconductors.

“This phenomenon of trapping electrons and turning liquid cement into liquid metal was found recently, but not explained in detail until now,” Benmore said. “Now that we know the conditions needed to create trapped electrons in materials we can develop and test other materials to find out if we can make them conduct electricity in this way.”

http://www.anl.gov/articles/formula-...g-cement-metal

The old ways, the glass towers of old. Their return. Those sort of limits...ended. Growth takes other avenues, worlds open.

Materials as strong as molecular bonding itself, but as alive, a computerized living thing. That is where this is going to go. The living crystals materials and cities return. (or come to us for the first time, depending on your viewpoint)

[Ernie Nemeth]

Would these "trapped" electrons be the same process as electronic doping of a substrate to enhance certain electronic capabilities? Or is this another process?

What materials are used?

[Carmody]

David Hudson finally speaks, for the first time in 12 years. A two hour presentation:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=0IgYp4Noz90

[Flash]

Posted by Carmody (here)
David Hudson finally speaks, for the first time in 12 years. A two hour presentation:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=0IgYp4Noz90

for those who find the science very heavy, the spiritual and eternal life chat starts at 1h27 minutes. THis guy is just absolutely incredible, I loved it, and all explaining very well how to get the monoatomic gold or ormus.

I can't believe that some chinese are on it and do want to have it spread. This is really great.

[Flash]

What are the chance for it to work and not be stop by ptb so that is accessible to all????

I am kind of afraid for his life.

The Asian investor won't be happy either if he cannot have monopoly.

I bet you have to clean up your body prior as well.

THe controllers will not want to lose control, I am surprised this made it that far.

[thunder24]

there was something bout this man's eyes... I'v seen them, or similar before... As if they were taking in way more then the "average" human would notice was there...

great video.... thankyou.

peace

[eaglespirit]

Posted by Flash (here)
What are the chance for it to work and not be stop by ptb so that is accessible to all????

I am kind of afraid for his life.

The Asian investor won't be happy either if he cannot have monopoly.

I bet you have to clean up your body prior as well.

THe controllers will not want to lose control, I am surprised this made it that far.

David has been quiet for over a decade for MANY reasons, Flash...MANY Good Reasons, imho!

There is much, much more to this and a tremendous network of Good People around the World involved now!

David may have mastered some 'higher' talents himself and showing the way in a way that is not quite appearent in the 3d.

[Carmody]

Today's contribution to this thread, is over here:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post711478

[Ernie Nemeth]

The two dimensional aspect of this manifestation is sort of freaky, isn't it? It deconstructs our world view quite unceremoniously.

If the line is one dimensional, the plane two dimensional and the cube three, then what is the point? Zero dimension?

In the video Hudson claims that the sample weighed different values depending on temperature, sometimes rendering the sample effectively weightless. It occured to me that perhaps stellar mechanics needs a bit of revision to bring it in line with this research. Not to mention that cosmology that includes two dimensional translations or iterations would look far different than our standard model would allow.

Finally kinda get what Carmody is trying to impress on us all. The sky isn't falling, it was never there!

[TargeT]

Posted by Ernie Nemeth (here)
The sky isn't falling, it was never there!

and who made the sky.....


this is the train of thought that matters most, and yet effects us (or our perception of "us" as we can control it now) least.

[Mark]

Just spent the later evening watching the David Hudson video. There is indeed something going on with his eyes. I was struck by his mood most particularly. His energy. He is definitely not a psychopath. I sensed no guile in him. I also find it very interesting and assuring that he is not online. A search for him online found little evidence other than old information and links to this video. The science seemed solid from my bit-more-than-layman's understanding and as he was describing the processes of heating and precipitating and cooling I was struck by how much it sounded like what I've read of the traditional alchemical process of creating the philosopher's stone and the different phase changes of the material over the course of the process.

Found a couple of sites, one from Switzerland in particular that looked quite spiffy, that are selling ormus for what seem to be reasonable prices. Also found a few sites, one in particular from practicing chemists, tearing down Mr. Hudson and his science. I take them in stride realizing that as he himself said all during the video, the process defies all of the stuff that is taught in school and that normal experimentation provides.

One thing is for certain. If this stuff is real, one of his final comments is prophetic. "There will be good angels and bad angels" among those who use this material. Truly an Armageddon scenario, with higher dimensional forces in direct communion with worldy representatives capable of what seem to be super-hero capabilities.

Sounds like a summer action-adventure movie. A really really good one. I want to play.

[Carmody]

Today's contribution, stolen from the 'here and now' thread. It explains what Rahkyt ran into when doing research on Hudson.

The dogma.

Descartes was a rationalist. A dismissive skeptic, a negative proofer, who projected into... as opposed to observing.

Bacon was an Alchemist.

Posted by araucaria (here)
Just heard on the radio: they have discovered that lab rats have a kind of NDE.

Now there were two directions to take this research. They might have explored the possibility of rats having a fom of consciousness closer to our own than previously thought. But no, the conclusion seems to be that we all... die like rats.

Uplifting as usual.

That is the origins of scientific principle, when done by the engineering mind. The mind that would be a mid level rubber-stamp paper-pusher cleric, in the middle ages.

Bacon's inductivism, vs Descartes Deductive/rationalism. that the engineering mind works from negative projection of deductive reasoning into rationalism, and forces prediction from what has been written before.

It throws away observation in favor of what it knows.

This is not science, it is pure projected emotion, in the form of filtered and 'blind to it's origins' thought formation.

Descartes was trapped in the box and limited himself to the idea of only creating from what is the box.

Whereas Bacon threw the box away and observed, in full awareness that he, as a observation platform, shaped the view, and attempted to compensate for that.

Descartes failed to recognize the internal shaping aspect as projection into the formation of all that follows - for all the wordiness wasted on trying to cover that up. Negative proofing by forcing nature into expectations and projections, and all that.

Bacon was alchemical and Buddhist-open, in comparison.

Bacon's scientific revolution was an open and expanding universe, whereas Descartes' universe was a closed one forced by human desire.

Descartes' universe is doomed to fail, even though it tries to build ever more complex shapes from it's limited box bits. This is why you never let engineering minds drive mental revolutions, as they fold back on themselves.

But they can't see this, so they force as hard as they can for their box and walls, running roughshod over all the rest.

They make an excellent zipperhead warrior (as praetorian guard) for the academic machine.

Descartes ended up existing in projected dogma, not realizing that he did. Thus the appeal of an apparent openness - to the ultimately 'unaware of itself' closed mind. Very comfortable and easy to adopt.

when science has problems it has to retreat to the parent and ask what is going on. it has to retreat to philosophy, it's origin point. Scientific method and science is a minor subset of philosophy. Nothing more. Like all angry children, it does not want to talk to it's parent, it wants to figure out out on it's own. That's fine.

But it needs to understand it's origins.

The more difficult a problem to solve, the more basic, the more fundamental the mistake.

First... to realize the problem exists. Science fights to deal with the understanding that a fundamental problem exists.

And when it does, it must ask it's parent.... philosophy, 'Who am I?'

"Some of the most important debates in the history of scientific method center on: rationalism, especially as advocated by René Descartes; inductivism, which rose to particular prominence with Isaac Newton and his followers; and hypothetico-deductivism, which came to the fore in the early 19th century. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, a debate over realism vs. antirealism was central to discussions of scientific method as powerful scientific theories extended beyond the realm of the observable, while in the mid-20th century some prominent philosophers argued against any universal rules of science at all."

If you create a rule, you've got rolling and expanding dogma as an ever increasing intrusion, and, over time...you are back to square one with written and inescapable religion.

[Carmody]

Cognitive obscuration in humans proven.

Language and sight intertwined, tested..... and shown as proven.

The roots of manipulation of societies and individuals - proven.

What does this say about duality, hypnotics (methodology)...and humans?

Since we can 'hypnotize' a human, and gain insight into dimensional realities, astral travel, remote viewing and sensing out of time and timelines, where does this 'proof' leave us?

Study shows language can cause the invisible to be seen

Researchers Gary Lupyan and Emily Ward from the University of Wisconsin and Yale respectively, have run experiments that show that in some instances, language can cause objects that are obscured from view, to come into focus. In their paper published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the team describes experiments they conducted that contradict the notion that vision and language processing are separated in the brain.

In the never ending process of attempting to understand how the human brain works, researchers have separated out certain components to see how the others respond. In other experiments, they have tried bombarding the senses to see how the brain reacts. In this latest effort, the researchers took the latter approach.

To ascertain if the brain has different processing sections for the different senses, e.g. vision, hearing, tasting, etc. the researchers used continuous flash suppression. This is where a picture of an object is shown to one eye while the other eye is bombarded with a flashing image of tangled lines. Prior research has shown that the flashing imagery causes the brain to completely ignore the image that is being shown to the other eye. The researchers sought to learn whether this result could be changed if another sense was added—that of hearing recognizable words.

To short-circuit the continuous flash suppression effect, the researchers played recorded verbal cues that either did or did not have some connection to the image that was being displayed in the other eye—offering the word "circle" for example, if the image was indeed that of a circle.

That was really all it took. When the researchers offered valid clues, the volunteers in the experiment began reporting being able to see the image being shown to one eye, despite being flashed in the other. In contrast, when given words that were not related to what was being shown, the volunteers were still not able to see the image right in front of their eye. This, the researchers contend, suggests that the brain does not separate processing of input information by type. Instead, it appears clear that there is some overlap. They suggest that the word cue causes the brain to "get ready" for what is to come next. If what was advertised does show, then the brain is ready to see it, despite the distraction offered to the other eye. If it doesn't, then the distraction overwhelms the senses causing the image to be ignored.

Explore further: Babies show visual consciousness at five months

More information: Language can boost otherwise unseen objects into visual awareness, PNAS, Published online before print August 12, 2013, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1303312110

Abstract
Linguistic labels (e.g., "chair") seem to activate visual properties of the objects to which they refer. Here we investigated whether language-based activation of visual representations can affect the ability to simply detect the presence of an object. We used continuous flash suppression to suppress visual awareness of familiar objects while they were continuously presented to one eye. Participants made simple detection decisions, indicating whether they saw any image. Hearing a verbal label before the simple detection task changed performance relative to an uninformative cue baseline. Valid labels improved performance relative to no-label baseline trials. Invalid labels decreased performance. Labels affected both sensitivity (d?) and response times. In addition, we found that the effectiveness of labels varied predictably as a function of the match between the shape of the stimulus and the shape denoted by the label. Together, the findings suggest that facilitated detection of invisible objects due to language occurs at a perceptual rather than semantic locus. We hypothesize that when information associated with verbal labels matches stimulus-driven activity, language can provide a boost to perception, propelling an otherwise invisible image into awareness.


http://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-0...invisible.html

[Carmody]

Today's contribution to this thread, is happening over here.

I've never watched Rupert Sheldrake's banned ted talk. In it he mentions a fundamental in science that illustrates all of what I speak of. A constant in science would not change... and via the use of that constant in science..via extrapolation as a fundamental in all that follows... this would disallow for all the of the stuff that is on this forum. It would allow for purposed and effected blindness, which would become a herd response, and this would unfold into science. It would remove question and insert dogma. Remove opportunity for question to arise, by changing a duly noted variable...into to a permanent constant. Locked dogma.

What is illustrated, is HOW the lie crept into the equation, by the direct use of circular logic applied to the creation and maintenance of the constants of physics.

Just SLIGHTLY out of your sight. That's all the secret society types need to do, is to make minor, nearly unnoticed changes, that stay beneath the radar of people.

These are the areas where the lies, changes and subtle shifts are found.

Since I was a child, a small child, I realized this point.... and I always looked at the detail in the fine print.

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post716518

[Carmody]

Today's contribution to this thread, is happening over here:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post721606

Connected to this, is....:

http://phys.org/news/2013-08-physici...te.html#ajTabs

[Carmody]

Today's contribution to this thread, is (listed this time), concerning the evidence of and adding to the periodic table..of element 115, which was supposedly (speculated and spoken of years before, see the thread) used in UFO manufacture for dimensional and anti-gravity craft.

Well, well, well..that it fits so PERFECTLY into this lithium, gold,and bismuth story in this thread here.

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post722060

Posted by Carmody (here)
Let's move into Robert e. Cox's revelation that it is BISMUTH that allows for the alloying into the alchemical creation of 'the white powder of gold', where we get to cooper paired gold atoms that are both in and out of this 'reality'.

UUP just below Bismuth on the periodic table....

Now let us return to the idea of very high energy state, the highest energy state, the FIRST solid on the periodic table, Lithium.

Lithium as a catalyst and binding agent in the atomic level creation of an alloy. The whole Afghanistan invasion and lithium trove issue. CIA backed, Nazi origins, Nazi bell and UFO/dimensional craft issue.

BTW, Nevada the UFO presence state, the 'area 51 state'..... is also 'the lithium state'.

Then, out Peru/Bolivia way, more attention in the lithium troves out there. More presence of encounters with dimensionally enabled 'creatures'.

Thus we are probably looking at the creation of the UUP alloy in a bound state, like the white powder, involving bismuth, lithium, gold, etc.

Bake (sinster,etc) the alloy, build the craft properly, tickle it with electricity to enable force creation/gating/interaction and .... you've got the dimensional, shiny UFO -like craft that are seen in the skies.

That UUP can be made and be made stable, but it must be manufactured in an alloyed bonded state.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

All the more reason to try and create chaos right now, in the middle east ......and bury all of this data and connective tissue.....before it gets out to the general population.

[Carmody]

Triple point: Physicists pinpoint key property of material that both conducts and insulates

speaking of alloying:

It is well known to scientists that the three common phases of water – ice, liquid and vapor – can exist stably together only at a particular temperature and pressure, called the triple point.

Also well known is that the solid form of many materials can have numerous phases, but it is difficult to pinpoint the temperature and pressure for the points at which three solid phases can coexist stably.

Scientists now have made the first-ever accurate determination of a solid-state triple point in a substance called vanadium dioxide, which is known for switching rapidly – in as little as one 10-trillionth of a second – from an electrical insulator to a conductor, and thus could be useful in various technologies.

"These solid-state triple points are fiendishly difficult to study, essentially because the different shapes of the solid phases makes it hard for them to match up happily at their interfaces," said David Cobden, a University of Washington physics professor.

"There are, in theory, many triple points hidden inside a solid, but they are very rarely probed."

Cobden is the lead author of a paper describing the work, published Aug. 22 in Nature.

In 1959, researchers at Bell Laboratories discovered vanadium dioxide's ability to rearrange electrons and shift from an insulator to a conductor, called a metal-insulator transition. Twenty years later it was discovered that there are two slightly different insulating phases.

The new research shows that those two insulating phases and the conducting phase in solid vanadium dioxide can coexist stably at 65 degrees Celsius, give or take a tenth of a degree (65 degrees C is equal to 149 degrees Fahrenheit).

To find that triple point, Cobden's team stretched vanadium dioxide nanowires under a microscope. The team had to build an apparatus to stretch the tiny wires without breaking them, and it was the stretching that allowed the observation of the triple point, Cobden said.

It turned out that when the material manifested its triple point, no force was being applied – the wires were not being stretched or compressed.

The researchers originally set out simply to learn more about the phase transition and only gradually realized that the triple point was key to it, Cobden said. That process took several years, and then it took a couple more to design an experiment to pin down the triple point.

"No previous experiment was able to investigate the properties around the triple point," he said.

He regards the work as "just a step, but a significant step" in understanding the metal-insulator transition in vanadium dioxide. That could lead to development of new types of electrical and optical switches, Cobden said, and similar experiments could lead to breakthroughs with other materials.

"If you don't know the triple point, you don't know the basic facts about this phase transition," he said. "You will never be able to make use of the transition unless you understand it better."

~~~~~~~~~~

http://phys.org/news/2013-08-triple-...-material.html

[Carmody]

Alcubierre drive


The Alcubierre drive or Alcubierre metric (referring to metric tensor) is a speculative idea based on a solution of Einstein's field equations in general relativity as proposed by Mexican theoretical physicist Miguel Alcubierre, by which a spacecraft could achieve faster-than-light travel if negative mass existed. Rather than exceeding the speed of light within its local frame of reference, a spacecraft would traverse distances by contracting space in front of it and expanding space behind it, resulting in effective faster-than-light travel.

Objects cannot accelerate to the speed of light within normal spacetime; instead, the Alcubierre drive shifts space around an object so that the object would arrive at its destination faster than light would in normal space.[1] Although the metric proposed by Alcubierre is mathematically valid in that it is consistent with the Einstein field equations, it may not be physically meaningful or indicate that such a drive could be constructed. The proposed mechanism of the Alcubierre drive implies a negative energy density and therefore requires exotic matter, so if exotic matter with the correct properties does not exist then it could not be constructed. However, at the close of his original paper[2] Alcubierre argued (following an argument developed by physicists analyzing traversable wormholes[3][4]) that the Casimir vacuum between parallel plates could fulfill the negative-energy requirement for the Alcubierre drive. Another possible issue is that although the Alcubierre metric is consistent with general relativity, general relativity does not incorporate quantum mechanics, and some physicists have presented arguments to suggest that a theory of quantum gravity which merged the two theories would eliminate those solutions in general relativity which allow for backwards time travel (see the chronology protection conjecture), of which the Alcubierre drive is one.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcubierre_drive