Agenda 21

[Atlas]

Ann Bressington exposes Agenda 21, Club of Rome, Sustainable Development, at the Lord Monckton Launch 2 Feb 2013 at the Adelaide Convention Centre :

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Bo5n4zeEetg

[ktlight]

Very important and very interesting, Ria.

[Bill Ryan]

-------

From http://planet.infowars.com/preparedn...21-latest-news


Front cover to Agenda 21
(Photo: United Nations / Wikipedia)

This United Nations program lays out a comprehensive plan of sustainable development locally, nationally, and globally in every area where humans affect the environment.

Basically, it’s the UN’s plan to establish control over all human activity, including man’s reputed contribution to climate change.

The UN is at the hub of a global network working to submerge the independence of all nations in a world government controlled by the elite.

[From Bill]

It's Problem-Reaction-Solution, yet again.

There are legitimate, urgent concerns about population, the environment, climate change, and the use and abuse of finite resources.

But these concerns are being used to justify more and more restrictive, hierarchical control over every aspect of human activity and resource ownership. And resource ownership even extends to the trees in your garden.

Dr Bill Deagle has stated as long ago as December 2006 that the entire world is now supercomputer-modeled. That means very building, every vehicle, every shipment of every salable object, every personal movement, every personal profile, every financial transaction, every communication.

It all goes into the model, which is used for predictive forecasting and the identification of the optimum control protocols -- all played out like a supergiant chess computer. It was probably even predicted that I would make this post...



There will be levels of access to this very detailed information. Not all agencies have it all. But it's all there, ready to be harvested. Agenda 21, as best I understand, is the legitimization, through PR, that all this is needed and justified.

[superconsciousness]

I posted something but I need to watch the whole video before I write anything and I don't know how to delete this. sorry....

[nomadguy]

A very important piece of this puzzle is to make water, air and carbon commodities.
Weather(modification), Water(filtration, delivery, storage), Farming(food/fiber)

The goal appears to be the conception of a new marketplace built on new technology with a new world currency to go with it. All of these efforts, in my view, will lead to the ruination of our humanity, our society and quite possibly the Earth itself.
The creators and backers of this plan will argue that it is all safe and HAS to happen. Fear is being ratcheted up in the MSM and in some of the alternative media to push the group mind awareness into a corner. Then they reach out with a hand and the solution. This is simply another clever way to walk the lambs down the hallway into the slaughterhouse.

One ways this PR agenda is working to bamboozle the public is to change ~by slight after slight-overtime, the meaning of words and phrases we already know and use. Like the word "sustainable" to note just one example.

[araucaria]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
It was probably even predicted that I would make this post...

Hence unpredictability, aka creativity, is of the essence. We can do that

[778 neighbour of some guy]

"All Roads of Injustice Lead to Agenda 21"

The speaker is Rosa Koire, the author of "Behind the Green Mask" which explains what Agenda 21 really is. Rosa Koire is a Democrat speaking before a group of Tea Party Members. UN Agenda 21 doesnt discriminate based on Political Affiliation, Race, Sexuality, Creedo or whatever. Agenda 21 is about the Extermination of Mankind and Ultimate Control for those that are left. Those in power know that they cannot follow through on their plans unless Liberty, Money and Property are taken away. This is in their own literature and UN Agenda 21 DEMANDS Zero Economic Growth.

Agenda 21 is about World Dominance and nothing else. The Wars, Attack of Christians, Attack of God & Religion, Chemtrails, Economic and Monetary Collapse, Government Corruption, Carbon Taxes, Gun Control, CORPORATE Owned Media, UFO Sham, Erosion of Rights, Lies About Global Warming, Lies About Overpopulation, Perversion of Societal Values, Dumbing Down, Drugs, Substandard K-12 Education, Monsanto, are all a result of the Mandates set forth by U.N. Agenda 21.

At the Rio 2012 Summit on UN Agenda 21, it was stated that "Governments should invest their transportation money on Public Transportation because roadways only largely benefit those that own vehicles". Really? I thought Roadways benefitted the Economy and Society as a Whole. Roadways get us to and from work, to grocery stores, to the bank, to restaurants, to shopping malls. Roadways transport our food and things we need. The UN intends to Impede our Right to Travel and Pursuit of Happiness.

As far as the Middle East Wars go, Reagan demonstrated that war is unnecessary. When Khadaffi was openly threatening us, Reagan bombed his house and we didn't hear much from him after that. The other middle east countries quickly fell in line and repaired their relations with us. With the technology we have today, and that includes Intelligence, Satellite, SDI, Drones and DEWS, we could take out the hostile leaders of these countries without having to go to war.

How did it come to this? It all started with the Fabian Society and the Act of 1871, where Congress created the DC Corporation & created a new Constitution, then the FEDERAL US GOVERNMENT became a Corporation. As the largest Corporate Conglomerate on the planet, the US GOVERNMENT owns majority shares in ALL of THE Fortune 500 Companies and their CAFR reports prove this (See the channel belonging to CorporationNation "Dear Matt Damon" videos). The Act of 1871 was not only Unconstitutional, but is INVALID. The FED GOVERNMENT we have today is the De Facto, or Shadow Government. But, we cannot do anything about that now but we can put a halt to the Ultimate Goal, which is this Evil Agenda and then begin to put this Great Country of ours back together and reverse the treasonous legislation. We must also OUST anyone who showed any inkling of support for UN Agenda 21. UN Agenda 21 has been in the works for decades, now, and is the primary reason for the corruption & depravity we see everywhere today at all levels.

Don't let yourselves be fooled - everything else is a smokescreen to keep your attention away from Agenda 21. Once Agenda 21 becomes fully implemented, all hope is lost. Get the information out to your neighbors, home owners, business owners. Chances are, they have never heard of UN Agenda 21. Since Agenda 21 is implemented Locally, once the people are mobilized, they can take the issue to their City Council and County and put a halt to all policies, monies and ties to UN Agenda 21 and ICLEI.

We cannot change the past but we can affect tomorrow by the actions we take Today.

IF WE CAN ABOLISH AGENDA 21 WE CAN BEGIN TO FIX OUR NATION AND RESTORE THE ORIGINAL CONSTITUTION AND HAVE THE GOVERNMENT "OF THE PEOPLE, FOR THE PEOPLE" .

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=GoMaYJwLyu4

[superconsciousness]

The basis of this agenda against agenda 21 appears to be about rights of property owners? As far as a UN resolution, that is non-binding on a sovereign nation.
So the principles here of sustainability are the pathway to poverty and marshall law? How about Nestle corporation that wants to privatize all the world water, with no rights to the general population.

How about Monsanto owning the patent on seeds? Are they part of Agenda 21?

Why is lowering your energy usage a bad thing? We're currently working with a national grid that is vulnerable and mostly uses coal and dirty fuels to power it. The US uses 25% of the worlds resources at the expense of the rest of the world. We used to have awesome public transportation - this was dismantled by the OIL/GAS interests together with the AUTOMOBILE industry.

Water has been siphoned and is being siphoned for Energy USE, we use LIQUID FUELS, so that we can drive our individual cars and this is some kind of American dream. Let's fight wars so we can drive our cars!

What's wrong with thinking about helping your community or working toward the common good? That's a bad thing? Check the numbers on national resources - we are gluttonous and incredibly wasteful in the way we use resources. It's not smart and the way it works now cannot last without more wars.

With all respect - Please somebody tell me - in a non-sarcastic manner - because I'm watching this video of Rosa Koire and it's so derisive - why the Agenda against Agenda 21 is not funded by the large corporate interests - factory farming - Big Chemical - Big Oil and Gas - etc - that have insidiously taken over this country?

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by noramaccoby (here)
The basis of this agenda against agenda 21 appears to be about rights of property owners? As far as a UN resolution, that is non-binding on a sovereign nation.
So the principles here of sustainability are the pathway to poverty and marshall law? How about Nestle corporation that wants to privatize all the world water, with no rights to the general population.

How about Monsanto owning the patent on seeds? Are they part of Agenda 21?

Why is lowering your energy usage a bad thing? We're currently working with a national grid that is vulnerable and mostly uses coal and dirty fuels to power it. The US uses 25% of the worlds resources at the expense of the rest of the world. We used to have awesome public transportation - this was dismantled by the OIL/GAS interests together with the AUTOMOBILE industry.

Water has been siphoned and is being siphoned for Energy USE, we use LIQUID FUELS, so that we can drive our individual cars and this is some kind of American dream. Let's fight wars so we can drive our cars!

What's wrong with thinking about helping your community or working toward the common good? That's a bad thing? Check the numbers on national resources - we are gluttonous and incredibly wasteful in the way we use resources. It's not smart and the way it works now cannot last without more wars.

With all respect - Please somebody tell me - in a non-sarcastic manner - because I'm watching this video of Rosa Koire and it's so derisive - why the Agenda against Agenda 21 is not funded by the large corporate interests - factory farming - Big Chemical - Big Oil and Gas - etc - that have insidiously taken over this country?

Hi, Nora, and many thanks -- everything you say is 100% correct and relevant. We're in very deep trouble on this planet, and we need good solutions, right now.

But (see my post #6 above):

It's Problem-Reaction-Solution, yet again.

There are legitimate, urgent concerns about population, the environment, climate change, and the use and abuse of finite resources.

But these concerns are being used to justify more and more restrictive, hierarchical control over every aspect of human activity and resource ownership. And resource ownership even extends to the trees in your garden.

Dr Bill Deagle has stated as long ago as December 2006 that the entire world is now supercomputer-modeled. That means very building, every vehicle, every shipment of every salable object, every personal movement, every personal profile, every financial transaction, every communication.

It all goes into the model, which is used for predictive forecasting and the identification of the optimum control protocols -- all played out like a supergiant chess computer. It was probably even predicted that I would make this post...



There will be levels of access to this very detailed information. Not all agencies have it all. But it's all there, ready to be harvested. Agenda 21, as best I understand, is the legitimization, through PR, that all this is needed and justified.

[Cristian]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
Basically, it’s the UN’s plan to establish control over all human activity, including man’s reputed contribution to climate change.

The UN is at the hub of a global network working to submerge the independence of all nations in a world government controlled by the elite.[

Hi Bill,

I think I missed your opinion on global warming. Do you think is man made or a natural cycle used to spread fear and enforce control? Or a little bit of both?

Second, I see the Kyoto treaty as a tool that allows them to enforce more rules and control.

So what is your point in this article? http://www.serendipity.li/fe/ryan_di...re_project.htm

Is the world going to be a better place if the U.S. ratifies the Kyoto Protocol?

What is this global warming after all?

Why are we so focused on free energy ...when it is obvious we have to deal with and remove all this evil on this Planet before we can implement free energy - if there is really such a thing.
Free energy or not we can be happy and we can be so much more without them around.

[Octavusprime]

Posted by Cristian (here)


Why are we so focused on free energy ...when it is obvious we have to deal with and remove all this evil on this Planet before we can implement free energy - if there is really such a thing.
Free energy or not we can be happy and we can be so much more without them around.

Because the key to defeating evil is to break their control over us. The control ultimately comes down to our dependence on energy be it electrical or combustible. Free energy, DIY gas, solar etc is key to removing the shackles. By taking away their power and influence we destroy them without a single shot fired.. Although we all know they won't go down without a fight.

Nora, I think the major issue is not with sustainable energy but in the underlying goal of moving all humans to cities (forced containment) and then government acquisition of all rural/wild land. The thinking is once they own all resources of land, water, oil and minerals they have free rein to completely control all aspects of our lives. Having us penned up in a city makes control that much easier. With extermination through "natural disaster" or "terrorist acts" a now simplified task.

The corrupt and powerful want it all and using "sustainability goals" as a cover for the complete and final take over is a brilliant scheme.

Now I agree that we need sustainability. But not at the expense of my free will. So in essence I think we need to think global and act local. Agenda 21 seems a takeover of free will and all public resources by associating it all with a globally recognized need for a more sustainable means of living. Acting globally to control us locally.

I fear once the real goal is achieved that the oil barons, chemical conglomerates and dirty energy mongrels will just come in and do what they've been doing for millennia.... Charge us for the things we want and need. And when money isn't worth much I'm sure our lives will do.

[Atlas]

www.un.org/gmun wrote:

Sustainable Development: Advancing human progress in harmony with nature

Barcelona:

Mexico city:

Sao Paulo:

Shangai:

----------------
In harmony with nature....? Well I think this is a good idea.

[Atlas]

Posted by Octavusprime (here)
The control ultimately comes down to our dependence on energy

World Bank Group President Jim Yong Kim and UN Secretary General Ban-Ki-Moon:

By 2030, we will provide energy access to all the people around the world

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=l271GW9AAww

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Cristian (here)

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
Basically, it’s the UN’s plan to establish control over all human activity, including man’s reputed contribution to climate change.

The UN is at the hub of a global network working to submerge the independence of all nations in a world government controlled by the elite.

Hi Bill,

I think I missed your opinion on global warming. Do you think is man made or a natural cycle used to spread fear and enforce control? Or a little bit of both?

Both in combination -- I think.

Posted by Cristian (here)
Second, I see the Kyoto treaty as a tool that allows them to enforce more rules and control.

Yes, you may be right. I genuinely do not know for sure.

Posted by Cristian (here)
So what is your point in this article? http://www.serendipity.li/fe/ryan_di...re_project.htm

That's a blast from the past! The very first article I ever wrote on the internet... several years before Camelot, and also before the Disclosure Project was taken over (or before I knew it had been). Quite well-written, too -- I'd not seen it for a long time.

My point was this, when I wrote it (from the article):

It may be that the final piece of this jigsaw puzzle comes into view when we consider the possibility that the Kyoto treaty deliberately remains unsigned in order to maximise the problem we all face. Knowing full well that planetary oil reserves will run dry in our own lifetimes (and this is nowhere better presented than in The Last Hours of Ancient Sunlight, by Thom Hartmann), the scenario may well be to let the wells run dry; let there be power shortages, epidemics, starvation, and riots on the street; and then roll out the free energy generators that they have had secreted away all this time ... with the US as the saviour, and also in total control of the big bail-out.

[Delight]

Posted by noramaccoby (here)

If there's something I'm missing - please elucidate me. This is very concerning on both sides and appears to be a SERIOUS AGENDA to BREAK UP ANY ATTEMPTS TO IMPROVE THE WAY WE POWER OUR SELVES. To me, and to those I have worked alongside, the goal and the mission has always been to bring the tools of POWER TO THE PEOPLE, FOR THE PEOPLE, in harmony with our national security - clean water, air and earth.

Thanks for the conversatation about sustainability and other matters. I am posting this here because Nora is talking about Agenda 21 here.
If it should be moved, please mods move the post?

What is harmonious from the collective stand point is tyrannical if the individual wanting power to do something is at odds with the group. Maybe it would be harmonious to keep the land "pristine" but if things are enacted to say "sustainable" has regulations and we must comply, we need a very good reason and a local way to arbitrate for sense.

The local community is my interest too and I feel overwhelmed at times by the complexity because the "leadership" is looking as if from a perspective way off the ground. They have been persuaded they are the "keepers" of government, not the people's voice.

I have been looking at Agenda 21 for a few years and trying to put it in context.
This is what wikipedia says:

Agenda 21 is a non-binding, voluntarily implemented action plan of the United Nations with regard to sustainable development.[1] It is a product of the UN Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992. It is an action agenda for the UN, other multilateral organizations, and individual governments around the world that can be executed at local, national, and global levels. The "21" in Agenda 21 refers to the 21st Century. It has been affirmed and modified at subsequent UN conferences.

It was under most people's radar until recently. In my region, commissions are advising local government to enact regulations about land use. These are appearing as laws that show up like for "emergency management". When one looks carefully, these "laws" were crafted by a nongovernmental agency that can be tied back to a network of persuasion with an agenda. The local commissioners where I live are led to believe (or at least use that excuse) that some larger "government" like the state and the "Feds" (Big Brother we all must obey) says we have to do this "law" to GET FUNDING.

The end result is that without vigilance, we get laws that prevent at least a few people from using their land. Yes, there have been abuses by land owners and yet some of the big abuses have happened in forests and in watersheds owned by the Government.

This has become very ridiculous in a few cases I have known. It is the extremes that get reported on and in the middle is lots of tedious flack too. There is usefulness in the proposals for 21st century sustainable measures also.

The concern with verbiage is because words and concepts are co-opted and people have no time and energy to sort all the nuances so just use their affiliation to define the concepts. A few activist friends who see "A21" as 100% GOOD refuse to discuss the Agenda 21 issue with me (well, Me too as it becomes senseless).

Someone self identified as liberal and progressive (verbiage) sees complaints about Agenda 21 from people like Glen Beck and reacts "who in her right mind is going to be against protecting the environment?" I don't have any Glen Beck supportive friends and I have a hard time with him but that is not to say we should not listen to the bottom line...who will have the say about our bodies, our home, family and communities?

When I look at the map proclaimed to determine ultimate purposing in A21, people where I live would be removed. That has happened before to my family actually in the early 20th century in Tennessee.

The Great Smokey Mountain Park was established in 1934. There were people living there like my husbands grandparents who were removed. They were white and the same had happened to the nonwhite natives in the same region so there IS precedent for REMOVAL in the name of a "higher" manifest destiny.

Great Smoky Mountains National Park is a United States National Park and UNESCO World Heritage Site that straddles the ridgeline of the Great Smoky Mountains, part of the Blue Ridge Mountains, which are a division of the larger Appalachian Mountain chain. The border between Tennessee and North Carolina runs northeast to southwest through the centerline of the park. It is the most visited national park in the United States.[3] On its route from Maine to Georgia, the Appalachian Trail also passes through the center of the park. The park was chartered by the United States Congress in 1934 and officially dedicated by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt in 1940.[4] It encompasses 522,419 acres (816.28 sq mi; 2,114.15 km2),[1] making it one of the largest protected areas in the eastern United States. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_S..._National_Park

[gripreaper]

Posted by noramaccoby (here)
The basis of this agenda against agenda 21 appears to be about rights of property owners?

There are essentially no property rights. Allodial lawful title is held by the state. Only warranty deeds, the right to possession as long as you remain a good little slave, are allocated to the masses.

Posted by noramaccoby (here)
As far as a UN resolution, that is non-binding on a sovereign nation.

The UNITED STATES is a corporation, which is in bankruptcy, all assets and human capital pledged as collateral for this bankruptcy. We are under a military state of emergency, all sovereign immunity has been suspended.

Posted by noramaccoby (here)
So the principles here of sustainability are the pathway to poverty and marshall law?

Yes, potentially. One needs to look at the hidden government and economy and why the US was "allowed" to prosper in the last 80 years and why the elite are tearing it down now.

Posted by noramaccoby (here)
How about Nestle corporation that wants to privatize all the world water, with no rights to the general population. How about Monsanto owning the patent on seeds? Are they part of Agenda 21?

Nestle and Monsanto are part of a a global corporatocracy whose shareholders are the same elite who have controlling interests in all of the means of production worldwide. These elite have no national affiliation or make any decisions based on nation states. Those boundaries are just for us slaves to create divisiveness amongst us so that wars can be fomented. Same with religion.

Posted by noramaccoby (here)
Why is lowering your energy usage a bad thing? We're currently working with a national grid that is vulnerable and mostly uses coal and dirty fuels to power it. The US uses 25% of the worlds resources at the expense of the rest of the world. We used to have awesome public transportation - this was dismantled by the OIL/GAS interests together with the AUTOMOBILE industry.

Lowering one's energy usage within the context of the existing paradigm is not a bad thing. Running cars on hydrogen extracted from water can work, but the one ingredient needed to do so is illegal. Using opposing magnet technology to spin an armature which generates power could be implemented and installed on every individual house. But why is it not? Because the corporatocracy wont let it.

Posted by noramaccoby (here)
What's wrong with thinking about helping your community or working toward the common good?

Nothing. Decentralization and self sufficiency is tantamount to going against the beast and remaining powerful as individuals. Decentralization is strongly encouraged around here.

Posted by noramaccoby (here)
With all respect - Please somebody tell me - in a non-sarcastic manner - because I'm watching this video of Rosa Koire and it's so derisive - why the Agenda against Agenda 21 is not funded by the large corporate interests - factory farming - Big Chemical - Big Oil and Gas - etc - that have insidiously taken over this country?

It could be. Within the Hegelian dialectic of "problem, reaction, solution" both sides of the dialectic are controlled to bring about a new synthesis. This has also been discussed quite extensively here at Avalon.

We need a larger context. The Tesla energy technology which has been around for 100 years, is not based on any current models. It travels 100,000 miles per second faster then the speed of light and requires no wires and comes straight from the earth, unlimited. So, now oil and electricity becomes obsolete.

Water? Look into NAWAPA and the Financing Statement against the Federal Reserve for 14 trillion, blocking NAWAPA. Avail yourself of the threads on this subject too.

Welcome to the biggest rabbit hole known to man, Avalon.

[kanishk]

Agenda 21 in India

Agenda 21 - An Assessment
By- Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India
http://www.moef.nic.in/divisions/ic/wssd/doc2/main.html
Foreword by the Prime Minister of India


......................
Agenda 21 in India – Bribery First, Blackmail Later, Bullets at Last
By - ShelleyKasli

https://greatgameindia.wordpress.com...llets-at-last/



.......................

[BMJ]

Thanks kanishk,

From the greatgameindia website, the video below:

Agenda 21 For Dummies

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOERWe0qX68

Very interesting comment at 7.47 secs.

Quote: "Generally, more highly educated people, who have higher incomes, consume more resources than poorly educated people who tend to have lower income. In this case, more education increases the threat to sustainability."

[superconsciousness]

Thanks for the elucidation Gripreaper. It all appears quite terrible and insidious. I will do some more on the ground investigation when the school year begins. I know a lot of people using the sustainability language who have no idea about any of this and are doing good work.

However, I am likewise disturbed by the anti Agenda 21 objective to organize and derail and ridicule against anyone who says they are into community sustainability, doing energy audits, etc ...as laid out in the first post here.

It seems like the whole body and frame has been set up for people who agree with each other to fight each other.

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by BMJ (here)
Thanks kanishk,

From the greatgameindia website, the video below:

Agenda 21 For Dummies

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOERWe0qX68

Very interesting comment at 7.47 secs.

Quote: "Generally, more highly educated people, who have higher incomes, consume more resources than poorly educated people who tend to have lower income. In this case, more education increases the threat to sustainability."

I'd say that was a non sequitur. (Latin: 'it does not follow'.)

Affluent people certainly consume more resources. Affluent people also tend to be more highly educated (or affluent because they're highly educated).

But it doesn't therefore mean that educaton increases the threat to sustainability -- with the implication that the answer is to dumb everyone down!