The Death of Princess Diana

[Prodigal Son]

Posted by Cidersomerset (here)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=-jz_2_3Jx6I

Chis Everad interviews David on his views of the ritualistic murder of Diana
some of this is in the main documentry at the top of the page, but worth another
look ..imo...

From Icke's book, "The Biggest Secret", chapter 19. We have this epic quote from Christine Fitzgerald, Princess Diana's gifted healer and close friend for nine years. Here's what she had to say about the Queen and the "Royal" (lol) Family....

“The Queen Mother... now that’s a serious piece of wizardry. The Queen Mother is a lot older than people think. To be honest, the Royal Family hasn’t died for a long time, they have just metamorphosised. It’s sort of cloning, but in a different way. They take pieces of flesh and rebuild the body from one little bit. Because it’s lizard, because it’s cold-blooded, it’s much easier for them to do Frankenstein **** than it is for us. The different bodies are just different electrical vibrations and they have got that secret, they’ve got the secret of the micro-currents, it’s so micro, so specific, these radio waves that actually create the bodies. These are the energies I work with when I’m healing.

They know the vibration of life and because they are cold-blooded, they are reptiles, they have no wish to make the Earth the perfect harmony it could be, or to heal the Earth from the damage that’s been done. The Earth’s been attacked for zeons by different extraterrestrials. It’s been like a football for so long. This place was a bus stop for many different aliens. All these aliens, they could cope with everything, including the noxious gases.

They’re landing all the time and coming up from the bowels of the Earth. They looked like reptiles originally, but they look like us when they get out now through the electrical vibration, that life key I talked about. They can manifest how they want to. All the real knowledge has been taken out and shredded and put back in another way. The Queen Mother is “Chief Toad” of this part of Europe and they have people like her in each continent. Most people, the hangers on, don’t know, you know, about the reptiles. They are just in awe of these people because they are so powerful.

“Bal moral is a very, very nasty place. That’s somewhere they want to dig underground. They will find reptile fossils, it goes back that far. Don’t think of people like the Queen Mother and Queen Victoria, as different people. Think of them as the same person which after a while has had to replace their coat. When the flesh dies, that energy, while it’s dying, will be immediately up someone else’s jacksy (backside). It’s very vampire, worse than vampire.

They are not going to come to you with hooked teeth and suck you’re blood. Fear is their food, they can actually take fear and manifest it into a tangible thing. The key is the vibrational current. At that vibrational current, they can manifest anything from anything. Its like a holographic image. We are all minerals and water vibrating. This is all an illusion we are living in. That’s the secret. You know when the monarchy’s fallen, it’s not the end of it. They will manifest in another form. The reptiles have never been defeated and this is the closest they have come to it.

The reason they are so threatened today is because the Earth is in such trouble and the mental power of people is returning. This is their most frightening time, but this is not going to kill them. There are long centuries before it’s over yet. The difference this time is that it’ll be more difficult for them and they are going to have to settle for less and the Earth people are going to get more.

But even though these reptilian ones are f**kers, they are sad, pathetic beasts really, while humanity is galloping towards light. They’re just pathetic lumps of nastiness who aren’t going to win. I can’t talk about this everywhere because they would just go ‘Christine, get a white coat, put it on backwards, get out’. But I want an end to the bulls**t.”

[Cidersomerset]

I agree Prodigal Son this is interresting material !! and would explain alot,
why we humans are always fighting with each other if these Reptillians
are keeping our frequencies low and vampiring off our energetic vibrational
fears !


[QUOTE

From Icke's book, "The Biggest Secret", chapter 19. We have this epic quote from Christine Fitzgerald, Princess Diana's gifted healer and close friend for nine years. Here's what she had to say about the Queen and the "Royal" (lol) Family....

“The Queen Mother... now that’s a serious piece of wizardry. The Queen Mother is a lot older than people think. To be honest, the Royal Family hasn’t died for a long time, they have just metamorphosised. It’s sort of cloning, but in a different way. They take pieces of flesh and rebuild the body from one little bit. Because it’s lizard, because it’s cold-blooded, it’s much easier for them to do Frankenstein **** than it is for us. The different bodies are just different electrical vibrations and they have got that secret, they’ve got the secret of the micro-currents, it’s so micro, so specific, these radio waves that actually create the bodies. These are the energies I work with when I’m healing.

QUOTE]


This material is hard for a mainstream newpaper to print other than The Sport, which I think is defunct, we all remember Elvis & the WW2 bomber on the Moon..LOL..

10 years ago I would have trouble believing this, but now I think its possible we have 'Reptillion Royalty' coming down thru the Sumarian bloodlines...
The clues are there , 'Blue bloods' the royals have been inbreeding for years with certain bloodlines adding a bit of fresh blood every so often.
The divine right to rule and all that 'rollicks', rituals for this and that its certainly opens the mind !!

[EYES WIDE OPEN]

So is this still available or did they purge it from the web?

[Cidersomerset]

So is this still available or did they purge it from the web?

Theres a version on here cheers ....


https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post614723

[EYES WIDE OPEN]

Cool. Thanks. I already have it but just wondered if it was still available as they cracked down it it pretty fast and hard.

[Conaire]

Keith Allen is one brave man. This film is an expose on the main stream media as much as it is about the death of Princess Diana. It is a well made film and would recommend watching it, if it's still available.

[Sabrina]

http://theneedleblog.wordpress.com/2...i-told-you-so/

Re: post 25 and the Princess film - it's been taken down from the blog above already... ho humm....


16 Jan

I Told You So.
BY ROYAL COMMAND

An article I can not mention.

Notification email (gojam’s note: don’t blame the messenger)

Dear gojam

We have received a DMCA Takedown Notice (http://chillingeffects.org/dmca512/faq.cgi#QID130) for the following material published on your WordPress.com site:

http://theneedleblog.wordpress.com/2...-dianas-death/

As per the DMCA’s requirements, we have disabled public access to the material. If you do not have the legal rights to distribute the material, you are required to permanently delete the post and/or content and let us know when this has been done.

Republishing this material without permission of its copyright holder – or continuing to publish material that results in DMCA Takedown Notices – will result in a permanent suspension of your WordPress.com site and account. Publishing such material is a direct violation of the WordPress.com Terms of Service , which you agreed to upon registration.

If you wish to formally challenge this notice, we will be happy to provide you will all of the appropriate details.

Thank you.

“Republishing this material without permission of its copyright holder – or continuing to publish material that results in DMCA Takedown Notices – will result in a permanent suspension of your WordPress.com site and account.” – I’ve already anticipated that scenario, the first steps have already been taken to counteract it.

I hope your boots have already been filled but if not stay tuned.

[jackovesk]

08 March 2013

A call to arms to all anti-NWO activist: Resist royal cyber-bullying with all available means



Three days ago, the Rebel Site got taken offline by its hosting firm under the provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998. The offense:

I had republished the 2011 British documentary “Unlawful Killing” produced by Allied Star, a London-based film company owned by Egyptian billionaire Mohamed Al-Fayed, the father of Dodi Al-Fayed. The documentary implicates - amongst other things - the British royal family in the murder of the couple and its cover-up.

Youtube and Vimeo had already deleted the video a few weeks earlier, forcing me to host it directly on the Rebel Site. Two emails sent to me shortly after by the lawyers of my hosting firm unfortunately got intercepted by the spam filter. In those emails they advised me that they had received a complaint by a London based law firm, claiming the hosting of the video was in breach of their client’s copyrights. Since I didn’t receive the emails I obviously couldn’t comply with their request, forcing my hosting company of 7.5 years to disable the site.

Grudgingly, I deleted the video as demanded to get the site back online as soon as possible. However, I sent a letter back to the lawyers, with a 10 days deadline to provide written evidence that the plaintiff’s law firm was acting on behalf of the copyright owner, Allied Star. I also sent an email to Mohamed Al-Fayed, asking for permission to publish the film. The reply of his office was swift. It confirmed that they had requested the London law firm to make me take down the video. The only reason they gave was that the film had been taken off the market.

It becomes clear, when watching the documentary, that Dodi’s father deeply loved his son and was shattered by his death. Why would he spend millions to produce and promote a documentary on the suspicious circumstances surrounding his death and shortly later take it off the market without giving much reason? The only explanation that makes sense is that he has been put under enormous pressure to do so. Not only has he been bullied to take his film off the market, but the blackmailers made it his problem to prevent others from republishing it.

Personally, I don’t respond well to bullying. I hate bullies and fight them with all available means. Thankfully I’m not alone. In this case of cyber-bullying, resistance is not only civil duty, but easy. Be warned though! It would be illegal to locate a copy of the “Unlawful Killing” documentary via any BitTorrent site and distribute it to as many people as possible. It would be illegal to burn CDs and pass them to all your friends. It would be illegal to upload the video to video hosting sites under its own or slightly altered name. And it would be illegal to create a torrent of your own on BitTorrent sites and share it for other people to download. But it is not illegal, to publish this article, share, email and republish it on your blog, and that’s exactly what I’m asking all of my readers to do. Make it go viral.

"The documentary the Windsors don’t want you to watch"

So let’s go back to the “Unlawful Killing” documentary and see what all the fuss is about. The film starts by showing a letter from Diana, hand-written to her butler, predicting her own violent death. It says,

“My husband is planning ‘an accident’ in my car. Brake failure & serious head injury.”

Less than two years later her prediction came true.



The documentary next shows numerous people saying that her death was murder. Mohamed Al-Fayed, Dodi’s father, goes even further. He goes on record in the documentary saying that it was a slaughter by the ‘bloody racist’ royal family. He thinks the royal family got his son killed because they were too racist to accept a foreign, Muslim step-father or a Muslim half-brother or half-sister for the future king.

The film maker himself, Keith Allen, points out how “chillingly convenient” it was for the Windsors that the crash happened when it did. Mohamed Al-Fayed describes how Diana, in the two weeks she stayed for a holiday with her sons at his house, was worried that exactly that kind of accident would happened to her as it did shortly after. It would appear that she got warned.

The inquest

The documentary mainly focuses on the massive inquest at the Royal Court of Justice, dismissed by several speakers in the film as a cover up. They criticise that Charles, in spite of being implicated by Diana’s letter as trying to kill her exactly the way she died, wasn’t required to appear as a witness. It talks about how the Royal Court of Justice first sought to conduct the inquest without a jury, an attempt that got only overturned because of public pressure. It questions the impartiality of an inquest conducted at the Royal Court of Justice led by a “coroner” who has sworn his allegiance to the Queen, in a case where members of the royal family are the prime suspects. Not very surprising then for the film maker that the coroner appeared at times to have already made up his mind about the outcome of the inquest, before it had even started.

The whole point of the inquest was to examine the suspicious circumstances surrounding the car crash. Was it a pure coincidence that Diana had told many people that she had been warned by a confidential source in the palace, that Prince Philip had plans to deliberately kill her in a car crash, exactly the way she died?

Why didn’t the CCTV cameras along the route of the crash car apparently record anything, a ‘coincidence’ the crash shares with the 7/7 London Tube attacks? Were the driver’s blood samples tampered with to make him appear wildly drunk while seeming to be sober? Why were Diana’s phone calls being bugged by the American NSA? Why were Diana’s seat belts jammed on the night of the accident, preventing her from – as she normally would – wearing a seat belt, which probably would have saved her life? Why didn’t the police identify the owners or driver of any of the five other vehicles involved in the crash? And why did it take ambulances 2 hours to transport Diana to the nearest hospital?

According to the film, the suspicious circumstances didn’t stop there. Even before the end of the medical examination of his body, the French press already published headlines according to which the driver was "as drunk as a pig". That’s in spite of the fact that according to his hotel bill he had only had 2 Ricards, less than a quarter the amount of what French authorities claimed that he had drunk. Road sweepers were allowed by the Police to clean the site of the car crash, within hours of the accident. The film points out the similarity to the case of the Pakistani politician Benazir Bhutto, where the site of his murder was hosed down by police almost immediately after the attack, obviously because it is easier to claim it was just an accident if the evidence is washed away.

At the end of the inquest, the jury had heard so much suspicious information that the coroner heading the inquest could not take any risk. In his three day instructions to the jury, he told the jury to ignore the eye-witness statements and forbid the jury to even consider the possibility of murder. The jury, however, ignored the coroners instructions and spent a whole week to carefully examine the evidence for themselves.

The media

The film also examines the negative attitude of the media towards the inquest, obviously considering it to be a waste of time. It was quite common for the journalists observing the inquest to fall asleep or manicure their fingernails instead of paying attention to the witnesses.

They were only interested in information confirming the “established consensus”, established before the start of the inquest, that drunk driving and harassment by paparazzi had caused the crash, and ignored all the witness statements contradicting it. Any different view was regarded as “odd” and “conspiracy theory”.

Part of the problem, according to the film, was the fact that it was the royal correspondents, not legal journalists who were covering the inquest, in spite of the fact that Diana no longer had royal status at the time of her death. You cannot expect impartiality of journalists like the BBC’s royal correspondent, whose job it is solely to “suck up to the royal family” and portray it in the most favourable light possible. But even if they had wanted to, they wouldn’t have understood the detailed evidence or how the establishment was manipulating behind the scenes which and how much evidence they were allowed to see.

That’s why they didn’t question, for example, why the Royal Court censored into incomprehensibility letters of Prince Philip written to Diana. The Royal Court went even as far as forbidding close friends of Diana to tell the inquest about deeply hostile letters of Princess Philip written to Diana not long before her death.

The accident itself

The movie then describes the accident itself based on the reports of several witness statements in the inquest. Diana’s powerful Mercedes Benz quickly left the following paparazzi behind. When they entered the tunnel, they were surrounded by 4 motorcycles and a white Fiat Uno. Suddenly a very bright flashlight blinded Diana’s driver, making him lose control and crash head first into a concrete pillar. None of the other vehicles got ever identified. It’s been verified by the French police that none of the vehicles was driven by any of the paparazzi waiting in front of the hotel that night. They have all been accounted for. That didn’t stop the British media though from misrepresenting the inquest’s verdict – in a massive world-wide misinformation campaign led by the BBC - as saying that it was the following paparazzi who caused the crash. What the inquest actually established was that the vehicles surrounding Diana’s car in the tunnel caused the accident.

The ambulance

The most bizarre circumstance of the accident was probably the behaviour of the ambulance. Several ambulances arrived soon at the scene of the accident. Given the time of the day, after midnight, the streets were virtually empty. And yet, it took the ambulance carrying Diana 81 minutes to drive her to the near-by hospital, without making radio contact with the headquarter. That’s on top of the 37 minutes it took the oddly behaving doctor in sole charge of treating Diana, Jean-Marc Martino, to move the still conscious from the undamaged back of her car into the ambulance. If she had received prompt hospital treatment, the expert witnesses at the inquest all agreed, Diana would have survived.

The role of the MI6

The film coughs at the claim by the head of MI6 towards the inquest that his agency has never killed anyone in the past 50 years. It shows former MI6 agent Richard Tomlinson, an inquest witness, who has written a book titled “The Big Breach” describing how MI6 had planned to murder the Serbian leader exactly the same way how Diana, Dodi and her driver were killed: making his car crash in a narrow tunnel by flashing a very bright light into the driver’s eyes. The MI6 boss was obviously lying, a view supported in the film by another former senior MI6 agent, Baroness Daphne Park, who clearly states that she’s been involved in murders on behalf of the MI6.

Diana’s campaign to ban anti-personnel landmines

According to the film, MI6 and other secret services had more reason to want Diana dead than just her plan to get married to a Muslim: her highly effective support for the world-wide campaign to ban anti-personnel landmines. Her involvement caused huge anger amongst Western governments and the armament industry. It even caused the British defence minister Nicholas Soames to call Diana on the phone and tell her, “Don’t meddle in things you don’t know anything about. Accidents can happen.”

Diana’s murder happened just three weeks before the Oslo conference to ban anti-personnel mines. Without Diana as the most prominent ambassador of the conference, most of the world’s media no longer bothered to attend. Bill Clinton was the only government leader attending the conference who voted against a world-wide ban on landmines. If Diana had been still alive, he would have to do so while looking into Diana’s eyes. According to the film, many observers believe that’s the real reason why she got killed, but the coroner of the inquest wasn’t interested in that line of thought.

Dodgy autopsy results

The autopsy of the driver, which stated that he was highly drunk, in spite of having had only two Ricards that night and appearing completely sober on the hotel CCTV captured when leaving the hotel, was performed by Professor Dominique Lecomte, a doctor notorious for her involvement in French government cover-ups. Her autopsy was ripped apart by other medical experts as completely incompetent and having made several critical mistakes, as was Dr. Lepin’s result of the blood sample taken of the driver, which was found to have been highly likely tampered with. Professor Lecomte and Dr. Lepin both refused to attend the inquest, after being ordered by the French government to do so to protect the French state’s secrets and interests. When specialist later wanted to examine whether the DNA of the blood samples was identical with that of the driver, they were told by the French government that those samples no longer exist.

Police corruption

Diana had not only spoken to numerous friends about her ex-husband's family planning to kill her in a car accident and mentioned it in a letter to her butler. She had also written a letter to her lawyer about it who passed it on to the police. In spite of her being later killed exactly in the way described in her letter, the chief of police kept the letter concealed for three years, knowingly breaking the law by concealing this devastating evidence. He was rewarded handsomely by the Queen by being made a ‘Lord’.

Not only did the autopsy report make false accusations about the driver’s alcohol level, it even suggested that he was a severe case of alcoholic. The English police tried to support this false claim by searching the driver’s apartment twice for alcohol. The first time they went there, they could only find a bottle of champagne and a ¾ empty bottle of Martini. Unsatisfied with the result they went in again, and this time they found enough alcohol to stock an entire bar.

Diana’s embalmment

In spite of no longer being ‘Royal’ at the time of her death, Diana was embalmed within hours of her death, according to the film, to make it impossible to perform a pregnancy test. Not only were her organs removed and destroyed, but so was the blood sample taken from her at her arrival at the Paris hospital. The film suggests that this was to avoid any suggestion that Muslim blood had entered the royal blood lines.

The Queen's private secretary

Sir Robert Fellowes was the highest ranked representative of the Windsors appearing at the inquest. Under oath, he claimed to have been on holidays for the entire period before and after the accident. Yet, the diary of Tony Blairs’ press secretary Alastair Campbell clearly states that she met Mr Fellowes on several occasions through the period he claimed to have been on holidays. Diana had mentioned to friends before that he was one of the three people she was most afraid of. She believed that Mr Fellowes hated her with a passion and wanted her out of the Royal family. The film suggests that Mr Fellowes had a leading role in the arrangements for her death.

The Fiat Uno

The prime suspect to have caused the crash is the driver of the Fiat Uno which was seen by numerous witnesses. Neither the English nor the French police was apparently able to identify him, and yet one of the best known paparazzi, James Andanson, with connections to secret services, drove exactly that kind of car. Andandon who made a fortune selling pictures of British royalties and other celebrities to the media, lived in France and was known to have followed Diana and Dodi in their last holiday before the accident. He was not part of the paparazzi crowd waiting in front of the Ritz hotel owned by Dodi’s father. When interviewed by French police about his whereabouts, he made contradictory statements, as did his wife and son who served as his alibis. In spite of these circumstances, the investigation against him was dropped and the search for the Fiat Uno ended without result. The inquest made no further attempt to establish who was driving the implicated car.

In 2000, Andason was found dead in his blazing car on a Ministry of Defense owned field outside Montpellier. He had no car keys with him and the two firemen who found him had seen two bullet holes in his skull. The French police however decided that he had committed suicide. The film maker comments that you don’t need to be a conspiracy theorist to find it hard to believe that a man shot himself in the head twice and then set his car on fire.

Royal family

The last third of the film goes in full attack on the Windsors. It criticises the huge cost to British tax payers, their racism towards non-Whites and their initial strong support for Hitler. It accuses the Queen mother, her husband, as well as Prince Philip and his sisters to have been highly supportive of Nazi Germany, at least initially. It goes on to ask why the British people still tolerates the monarchy. It accuses British officials of corruption because they were more loyal to the monarch than to the people and care more about earning a knighthood than obeying the law. The film goes even as far as calling the British royal family mafia-style gangsters.

Later in the film Prince Philip is quoted as saying that if reincarnation existed he would like to be reborn as a deadly virus, so he could do something about over-population. This quote must be seen in the context of Prince Philip being the highest ranked Scottish Rite Freemason, a secret society known to aim for a ‘big cull’ reducing mankind to a ‘sustainable level’ of 500 million, that is a reduction of 93%.

The most controversial part of the documentary is an interview with leading British clinical psychologist Oliver James, describing Prince Philip as someone without any internal sense of right or wrong. According to James, Prince Philip is completely selfish and does not care about anybody else. In his expert opinion, Prince Philip is on par with notorious psychopathic mass-murderers.

Summary

The main film very convincingly argues that – in the light of the long list of suspicious circumstances and cover-ups – it would be too much of a coincidence that Diana got killed exactly at a time when Western secret services and armament manufacturers were infuriated about her anti-personnel landmine campaign and the Windsors about the prospect of a Muslim step-father and Muslim siblings to the future British King.

My own first reaction, when I heard about Diana’s death, was to say that it was staged by the MI6. Like Mohamed al-Fayed and other people in the documentary, I suspected that the British royalties were too big bigots to let her get married to a Muslim man from the Middle-East. What I didn’t know back then was that Diana’s mother was a born Rothschild, making her and her children Jews according to Jewish law. I’m more inclined now to think that her murder was performed by Mossad, not so much to stop her anti-personnel mine campaigning or to avoid a Muslim step-father and Muslim siblings to the future British King, but to prevent Diana from converting to Islam, which she would have to get married to a Muslim man. This obviously would have spoiled the endless Jewish bragging over the future British King being a Jew.

https://therebel.org/editorial/58782...-dodi-al-fayed

PS - Here's the Documentary...

"Unlawful Killing" directed by Keith Allen - CinePolitics - 05-21-2011 (Part1)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Wf1Gh1VyjqA

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=QgJsvmbxys0

PSS - Here is the Queen's response...

...

[Earth Angel]

love the way they showed you how the media covered the trial......what a farce..Great picture of Queen Lizard there at the end jackovesk!

[Globeflyer]

Can any one point me to where I can watch this film ?? please?

[Hervé]

Posted by Globeflyer (here)
Can any one point me to where I can watch this film ?? please?

All the ways one can get their hands on that documentary are listed in the paragraph above the following quote in the OP:

"The documentary the Windsors don’t want you to watch"

[sigma6]

Or he got paid a huge sum of money... Makes me think of Dune... They called it Canli... Vendetta as an ongoing rivalry among competing elites, they live in a different world, different rules, different philosophies about how money works, how politics and power operate. He got bought off. He wouldn't succumb to "pressure".

[The One]

Wow will the truth be revealed

Scotland Yard says it is assessing new information on the death of Princess Diana to determine its "relevance and credibility".



New information that alleges Princess Diana was murdered has been passed to Scotland Yard through military sources, it has emerged.

The information, thought to include the allegation that the Princess of Wales, Dodi al Fayed and their driver were killed by a member of the British military, will be assessed by officers from the Specialist Crime and Operations Command.

According to Sky sources it was given to the police by the former parents-in-law of a former soldier.

The deaths of Princess Diana and Mr al Fayed in Paris in 1997 were investigated and examined during a 90-day inquest led by Lord Justice Scott Baker at the Royal Court of Justice in 2007.

On April 7, 2008, the jury concluded their verdict as "unlawful killing, grossly negligent driving of the following vehicles and of the Mercedes".


Princess Diana and Dodi al Fayed leaving the Ritz Hotel on August 31, 1997

The Metropolitan Police said its assessment was not a re-investigation and does not come under Operation Paget, the inquiry led by Lord Stevens into conspiracy theories surrounding Princess Diana and Mr al Fayed's deaths.

A royal spokeswoman said there will be no comment on the matter from Prince William or Prince Harry, or from Clarence House.

After the inquest, the Metropolitan Police said it had spent £8m on services arising from it and the Operation Paget investigation from 2004 to 2006.

Former Met Police commissioner Lord Stevens published his report in December 2006, rejecting claims that Princess Diana and Mr al Fayed had been murdered


The wreckage of the Mercedes the pair were travelling in when it crashed

Sky's Crime Correspondent Martin Brunt said: "We understand this information includes an allegation that Princess Diana and Dodi al Fayed and the driver of their car were killed by a member of the British military.

"The information we're told was passed to Scotland Yard quite recently. It also includes, we understand, references to something known as Diana's diary.

"These are very early days, the information has just come in, and Scotland Yard is adamant in saying that this is not a reopening of its investigation from 2004 when it spent three years looking into the circumstances of the Princess' death.

"But it is taking the information seriously and it is considering and it is possible that a new investigation may open."

Princess Diana, Mr al Fayed and their driver Henri Paul died after the Mercedes crashed in a Paris tunnel on August 31, 1997.

Diana was 36 at the time of her death and Mr al Fayed, the son of former Harrods owner Mohamed al Fayed, 42.

http://news.sky.com/story/1129902/di...ew-information

[Cidersomerset]

18 August 2013 Last updated at 00:24

Diana death: New information assessed by Scotland YardCCTV footage of Princess


Continue reading the main story
Related Stories
A tragic end to a day in Paris
Al Fayed abandons Diana campaign
Diana inquiry costs exceed £12m

The Metropolitan Police is assessing new information it has recently received about
the deaths of Princess Diana and Dodi Al Fayed in 1997.



Diana and Dodi Al Fayed on the day before they died Princess Diana and Dodi Al
Fayed died after leaving the Ritz Hotel in Paris on 31 August 1997




Scotland Yard said it was "scoping" the information and "assessing its relevance
and credibility".

It said it was "not a re-investigation" into the deaths of the couple in a Paris car
crash on 31 August 1997. An inquest in 2008 found they had been unlawfully killed,
partly due to the "gross negligence" of their driver.

In a statement, the Metropolitan Police said the assessment would be carried out by
officers from the specialist crime and operations command.

It added that the deaths had been "thoroughly investigated and examined" by the
inquest held at the Royal Courts of Justice in London.

Reports in several British Sunday newspapers suggest there are allegations the
military was involved and that information had been passed to the police by an
Army source.

A Met Police spokesman said that the force would "not discuss the source of the
information" it was assessing.

A royal spokeswoman also said there would be no comment on the matter from
Prince William or Prince Harry, or from Clarence House.

A spokesman for Mr Al Fayed said he had no comment to make, but said he will
be "interested in seeing the outcome", adding that he trusted the Met to investigate
the information "with vigour".

Paparazzi on motorbikes

Scotland Yard said its assessment did not come under Operation Paget - the police
investigation into allegations that the princess and Mr Al Fayed, her boyfriend, were
murdered.

The wreckage of the car after the crash which killed Princess Diana The car carrying
Princess Diana crashed in a tunnel It was a theory endorsed at the time by Mr Al
Fayed's father, Mohamed Al Fayed, the then owner of London store Harrods.
But in December 2006, the report into Operation Paget said it had found no
evidence of murder and dismissed all conspiracy theories surrounding the deaths.

Operation Paget concluded, just like the French investigation in 1999, that driver
Henri Paul had been drunk and driving at excessive speed.

Responding to reports of the new information, a spokesman for Mohamed Al Fayed
said he would be "interested in seeing the outcome" and trusted the Met would
investigate "with vigour".

Princess Diana, the former wife of the Prince of Wales and the mother of Princes
William and Harry, was 36 when she died alongside Mr Al-Fayed, 42.

Mr Paul was driving when their hired Mercedes crashed into a pillar in Paris's Pont
de l'Alma tunnel. The crash happened after the couple had left the Ritz Hotel and
were pursued by paparazzi on motorbikes. Mr Al-Fayed's bodyguard, Trevor Rees-
Jones, was the only survivor.

At the inquest into their deaths, the jury found the couple had been unlawfully
killed and the deaths were the result of "gross negligence" on the part of Mr Paul
and the paparazzi.

The paparazzi pursuit, Mr Paul's drink-driving and a lack of seatbelts contributed to
the deaths, the jury said.

The inquest lasted more than three months and heard from 250 witnesses.

After the hearing it was announced that its cost had reached £4.5m, with a further
£8m spent on the Metropolitan Police investigation.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23741483

[Ellisa]

What I find even more suspicious is that a movie about the death of the princess is due to be released---about now. Very fortuitous you have to admit. And once again I'll point out that had she worn her seat-belt she may have survived the crash, as did her body-guard, the only one to do so and the only one in a belt.

There is a brilliant sketch-satire by Mitchell and Webb which I would post if I knew how! I even saved it the first time I saw it--- nothing awful--just very clever.

[Cidersomerset]

A thread I put up earlier with some good info.....

What was MI6 team doing in Paris the night Princess Diana died?

THE EXPRESS............

Sunday December 30,2012


By Will Stewart



Princess Diana's death is still shrouded in mystery


RUSSIAN intelligence agents in France had become suspicious of the sudden arrival
of three senior MI6 officers in Paris before Princess Diana’s death, a new book
claims.Author Gennady Sokolov argues that she was killed in “a distinctly English
murder” contracted out by the British spies.In the book, to be published in ­Moscow
next year, hewill say the most likely scenario is that a microchip was planted in her
car enabling its steering and brakes to be disabled on a signal from an operative
who joined the chasing paparazzi.He claims: “There will never be documents about
it. Never. Those responsible must all have been liquidated. The traces have also
gone. Some of the witnesses disappeared in the strangest manner.”




Sokolov, who has many contacts in the Russian secret services, said the MI6
officers had arrived and stayed incognito. “Normally when players of such rank are
in the country the host intelligence services are aware about it. Here DST (French
counter intelligence) had no idea.

“Our people were following them. After all, they were leading faces of British
intelligence. Whatever people say about our guys from Yasenevo (headquarters of
Russian foreign intelligence, the SVR) they know their rivals very well.”
Sokolov claimed he had met Russian operatives who were involved in seeking to
establish the role of the senior British agents in France.The presence of MI6 figures
was known to the Scotland Yard inquiry into Diana’s death headed by former
Metropolitan Police Commissioner Lord Stevens.

An inquest returned a verdict of unlawful killing, blaming the drunken driving of Ritz
hotel security boss Henri Paul and pursuing paparazzi photographers for the fatal
crash in the Alma tunnel in August, 1997.

The security services have always denied any involvement in the Princess’s death.
Sokolov’s claims echo some of the views of Mohamed Al Fayed, whose son Dodi,
Diana’s lover, also died in the crash. The author’s dossier on the Princess’s death
was passed to the former Harrods owner before the inquest, though he never had
any contact with the tycoon, he said.In an article in the Komsoloskaya Pravda
newspaper, Sokolov said he had identified “at least three dozen absurdities” which
point to foul play and a sophisticated cover-up.

“Diana became a real threat to the Windsors,” he said. “There was a strong rumour
she was pregnant and I think that it was not a coincidence that her body was
mummified an hour before it was sent to London. After that it would be impossible
to identify if she was pregnant.”


There will never be documents about it. Never

Author Gennady Sokolov


http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/...ess-Diana-died


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is a very indepth look into the Royal connections with the occult, and
the background leading upto Diana's ritualistic Murder !!

Finished off in the Ambulance, an 11min journey took almost 2hrs
to get to the hospital !!

PT 13onwards goes into detailed analyst of the crash itselfe....In detail...

The 'Boston Brakes' assasination techniche to remotely
control a car with a micro chip causing it to crash. An
official UK form of assasination according to Sir Peter Horsely,
& Sir Rannalph Fiennes former SAS officer who both wrote about
this in their Books..

The researchers speculate this is how they took out
the Mercedes in the tunnel to hit the 13th piller, probably
controlled by the occupants of the white Fiat Uno clipped
by Andre Paul as he entered the Tunnel and lost control
of the steering due to these opperatives in the Fiat Uno
that sped away !!.....

Also confirms what the Russian author says above in Express
article and that Richard Spearman & Nicholas Langham two
senior MI6 operatives were in the British embassy on the night.

& much more....

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=G_9KO7TgNWk

pt 2 the rest of the episodes should run consecutively...

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=2F9qIhN9IBU

Read more...

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...678#post608678

[The One]

This is also a good documentary

A Message From British Film Director, CHRIS EVERARD:

Since 1997, I have been investigating the crash which killed Princess Diana, her companion, Dodi AlFayed, the driver, Henri Paul, and massively wounded ex-paratrooper Trevor Rees-Jones. LADY DIE represents nearly ten years of research by myself, DAVID ICKE and the co-authors of the book "Diana: The Hidden Evidence", JON KING and JOHN BEVERIDGE.

A Mercedes S280 of the exact model and year was purchased in order that tests could be made for this documentary. The film has a running time of nearly 4 hours and leaves no stone unturned.

The horrific history of the royal family is exposed, including the faked suicide/murder of Stephen Ward, Prince Philip's links with the Profumo scandal, Occult Cocktail Parties at the Cliveden Estate in the 1960s, the exorcism of Stephen Wards cottage, the double murder of two young princes in the Tower of London, the forced euthenasia of King George in 1936 - his killing was timed to coincide with the morning edition of The Times newspaper - and, of course, the film features a full investigation into the crash which killed Princess Diana.

I assembled a Scotland Yard-style incident board for the making of this documentary, which reveals hitherto unknown information about many of the characters involved in the plot to kill Diana.

The film explores the hand-written note which Diana gave to her butler - and another given for safe keeping to her lawyer - which explicitly said that a fake car crash, one which would result in death, was being planned by people working for Prince Charles.

DAVID ICKE bravely puts forward his research, based on confidantes of Princess Diana, which suggests that the crash in Paris was the beginning of a gruesome occult ritual with the time and place of the crash being chosen carefully to coincide with ancient Satanic Rites. Davids excellent book THE BIGGEST SECRET is also discussed in this film.

What exactly did the Queen mean when she warned Diana's butler PAUL BURREL, that there were "dark and mysterious forces" at work in Britain?

What was Henri Paul doing the hours immediately before he turned up for work on that fateful night?

Why was the SIPA press agency in Paris broken into following the death of a Paparazzi photographer?

Who were the senior MI6 and MI5 agents in the tunnel on the night of the crash?

Why was Klaus Werner deported after standing vigil outside Dianas apartment?

All these questions and much more are answered in this film, which was edited in a constantly moving vehicle and deposited at the DVD factories on the day that the British inquiry heard the father of Dodi AlFayed pronounce that his sons death was a case of Black & White MURDER.

The historical part of this film proves, using extensive photos, newspaper cuttings, film clips and testimonies, that the royal family have stabbed and slashed their way to power throughout the ages.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=uNic9mQAlIA

[Kryztian]

One must wonder, why is there a press release to get our attention to say "We have more information", and yet there is not actual information they can give us at this time? Why waist our time until you are ready to actually say something?

Here's my theory on this: the Cabal, Illuminati, the secret Powers that Be, or whatever you prefer to call them - they are a very fractured organization with lots of infighting, and one side will use black mail to get their way over another side. They use the media not only to deceive us, but to bring down the other side - to keep the other factions in line. The royal family clearly lies within one of those factions, and currently they are not towing the line, at least someone elses line, within the Cabal. The Royal family is being black mailed and are not giving in to the ransom - hence this press release. Someone is saying to Queen Liz "this is your last chance. Do what we ask or the truth about Diana's death will be revealed."

Another faction is the Vatican. One can see that they are being manipulated to. In 2010, one story after another came out about them - prostitution rings in the choir, child abuse in Wisconsin, Germany, and many other places. And so, they towed the line: Benedict resigned and they elected a Jesuit instead. Now its one glowing positive story after another about Pope Francis.

We know they are trying to destroy our world, our sovereignty, but hopefully, from their greed and selfishness, the factions in the cabal will destroy each other first.

[sheme]

QQ Are we subject to the laws of lible on this forum?

[BrianEn]

Diana was the only royal I ever liked. One of the first people to openly hug an AIDS patient. Damn fine woman. I hope this information can open some new doors, but I imagine the cover up machine has gone into overdrive.