Is Comet Ison Really A Comet?

[Mandala]

I'm not anywhere nearly proficient at interpreting pictures from the Huble Telescope. I have to question if it could be possible that what we believe to be Comet Ison is something else; like a ship?

I don't know, but some of you who are adept at understanding space photographs might say, "That's perfectly normal, and what a comet should look like.

I have noticed a few recent videos posing that question, but I don't have the knowledge to make a claim. What do you think?

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=suOaLZj2SPI

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=7AUljj2XTSI

[Jean-Marie]

Wow that is really something! Where are our debunkers? I miss Amzer Zo!

[ghostrider]

looks like two EMV's (energy rods) checking out this comet ... they usually stay around the sun ... the is a dwarf race of ET's that observe earth, they use these energy ships ... who knows , I cannot look that direction , till it gets further from the sun ... one thing for sure is, if it is EMV's , it will change shape at any time ...

[Sidney]

never mind i should have watched the second video before I commented. So now my response to this is, holy cow. Lets find more images and see if we can find more that prove this theory. I tried to lower the exposure on this but all I got was a round white blob. I obviously do not have the right software to tweak around with it.

[Jean-Marie]

Here is what someone posted on another forum about this image....

Hubble took those pics while tracking the stars. The comet was moving while the pic was being taken and that’s why it shows up as a line instead of a dot. There are 3 separate images combined to make this picture, so that’s why there are 3 separate lines. Nothing mysterious about this and it is quite common for comet images.

They were trying to show the comet and the faint galaxies in the background without either the comet or the stars showing movement. For the comet, they just boosted the brightness and that merged the 3 separate central condensations of each comet image into one big one. I’ve done this myself at times with my comet images. Its a quick and dirty way to get the comet and stars to “freeze” and not show movement. But, if you examine it closely like was done in the video, you’ll see the separate comet images and the movement that the comet made during the relatively long exposures that were used.

[sirdipswitch]

Love the part when the guy says 5 kilometers is 18 miles. ?? chuckle chuckle.

[JohnEAngel]

Posted by Jean-Marie (here)
Here is what someone posted on another forum about this image....

Hubble took those pics while tracking the stars. The comet was moving while the pic was being taken and that’s why it shows up as a line instead of a dot. There are 3 separate images combined to make this picture, so that’s why there are 3 separate lines. Nothing mysterious about this and it is quite common for comet images.

They were trying to show the comet and the faint galaxies in the background without either the comet or the stars showing movement. For the comet, they just boosted the brightness and that merged the 3 separate central condensations of each comet image into one big one. I’ve done this myself at times with my comet images. Its a quick and dirty way to get the comet and stars to “freeze” and not show movement. But, if you examine it closely like was done in the video, you’ll see the separate comet images and the movement that the comet made during the relatively long exposures that were used.

when i read comments such as this one regarding a possible discovery of a cover up i become suspicious. there are thousands of disinformation agents out and about who are quick to dispel such notions and they are very good at it. on the other hand it could be legitimate. i just keep an open mind to them.

[Spike]

I want to believe



But from what jean marie said makes sense too


On the other hand if it is it could be part of project blue beam. The craft could be ours a TR 3B, Ben Rich Lockheed Skunk Works CEO Admitted “We now have the technology to take ET home"


lluminati Card #6 - Meteor Strike

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=stt98qJvs-I

A False Flag Alien Invasion [The Final Card]

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=qf5SvJpGuv0

sounds like drums like the war drums

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=ReaOODCZtGc

project blue beam getting ready loud trumpet

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=-1IIUcNI0cw

I guess we will see -_-

[Helvetic]

We are not being shown the correct images. Until Now.
http://hla.stsci.edu/cgi-bin/display...430+WFC3+F606W

[Kryztian]

Using screen capture, I took the same untouched image of Comet Ison he used and loaded in into Corel Photopaint (similar to Photoshop) and adjusted the brightness - I did not get the same results. I just got a kidney shaped comet.

[Jean-Marie]

Here is a video debunking it.....

https://youtube.com/watch?v=MuA_bgWzpVY

Hope this helps.

[RMorgan]

Posted by Jean-Marie (here)
Here is a video debunking it.....

https://youtube.com/watch?v=MuA_bgWzpVY

Hope this helps.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=MuA_bgWzpVY

[toad]

Also besides the post processing creating ghosts and strange effects, comets are also composed primarily of ice, so they can reflect in odd ways especially its corona.

[Mandala]

This makes sense to me with time lapse, ghosting and exposure factors. Thank you for your input. I don't have the background to make a judgement on this.

[Helvetic]

This is the response from "BPEarthWatch" on youtube about the "Parallax".

Quote:
"Parallax is displacement of the apparent position of an object viewed from two lines of sight. In order for this to be parallax you require 1 object (ISON) as seen from 2 lines of sight and measures the angle of inclination between those 2 lines, Hubble is only 1 line of sight, this could not and can not be parallax the parameters are just not there."

[Nick Matkin]

It's been said multiple times on this forum already, but for those that have missed it:

Any mysterious/unusual/anomalous astronomical events will be picked up and discussed by the thousands of amateur astronomers all over the world - the vast majority of which have no connection with or can be controlled by NASA, secret world government, the ANUNNAKI (or probably any alien or inter-dimensional forces) or anyone/anything else for that matter.

If such an astronomical event were to appear, a subtle (or clumsy, heavy-handed) cover story published by NASA or any official body will be discussed, dissected and derided by these astronomers and spread across the web on their forums and websites - most of which anyone can look at without charge or registration.

Please don't forget that for any conspiracy story it is not just "us" (the free-thinking, enlightened alternative community) against "them" (the bad guys trying to hide the truth from "us"). There are thousands of unbiased, free-thinking, experienced, trained specialists in their field who would expose any real nonsense after multiple confirmations between themselves.

Such stuff just cannot be covered up for long - if at all.

Nick

[araucaria]

Posted by Helvetic (here)
This is the response from "BPEarthWatch" on youtube about the "Parallax".

Quote:
"Parallax is displacement of the apparent position of an object viewed from two lines of sight. In order for this to be parallax you require 1 object (ISON) as seen from 2 lines of sight and measures the angle of inclination between those 2 lines, Hubble is only 1 line of sight, this could not and can not be parallax the parameters are just not there."

Hubble is an orbiting telescope, hence it has 2 lines of sight from opposite sides of the globe, and all the other lines of sight in between.

[Helvetic]

ISON'S Debris Trail/Parallex Factor DEBUNKED, August 23, 2013

Source: BPEarthWatch youtube

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=dzEOkpmjKjk

Parallex Factor DEBUNKED.

[Carmody]

Posted by Nick Matkin (here)
It's been said multiple times on this forum already, but for those that have missed it:

Any mysterious/unusual/anomalous astronomical events will be picked up and discussed by the thousands of amateur astronomers all over the world - the vast majority of which have no connection with or can be controlled by NASA, secret world government, the ANUNNAKI (or probably any alien or inter-dimensional forces) or anyone/anything else for that matter.

If such an astronomical event were to appear, a subtle (or clumsy, heavy-handed) cover story published by NASA or any official body will be discussed, dissected and derided by these astronomers and spread across the web on their forums and websites - most of which anyone can look at without charge or registration.

Please don't forget that for any conspiracy story it is not just "us" (the free-thinking, enlightened alternative community) against "them" (the bad guys trying to hide the truth from "us"). There are thousands of unbiased, free-thinking, experienced, trained specialists in their field who would expose any real nonsense after multiple confirmations between themselves.

Such stuff just cannot be covered up for long - if at all.

Nick

There are huge forums dedicated to amateur astronomers, most of them owning multiple telescopes. Some of those scopes cost as much as a new car, some more. Some even have their own observatories.


I'll give you an idea. An image of what one customer owns. one for him, a 32" scope and a second one (his earlier buy) for his daughters -an 18" unit.



http://webstertelescopes.com/scopes_...y_in_stock.htm

They have that list 'in stock', they can make as big as a 60" unit. Things have really moved along in the world of telescopes and NO, no one could hide 'nibru' from them (all those amateur astronomers) at the distance "they" say it is from us....

Thousands from the one company and dozens of companies, most of them bigger than this one company.

Tens and tens of thousands of amateur astronomers with huge scopes, all looking at comet Ison. No joke.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Most importantly, in order to gauge exactly what this all means.... how much of a change is this, since ...oh.. the turn of the century?

Well, here's a list of the world's biggest 'scopes, at the turn of the century (1900). This will give you an idea HOW difficult it would be to hide ANYTHING that is in the skies from modern amateur astronomers. When 32"-40"-60" telescopes are now becoming easily possible, and 25" sizes are downright common.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...e_19th_century

I'm saying that 10's of thousands of amateur astronomers now have more observing horsepower than 99.99% of the professional astronomers had at the turn of the century.

And.. someone is going to hide something in the skies...from that crew?

I don't think so.

In this list, of the now, and the 20th century.....:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...e_20th_century

....... 60" units are listed (1960's or so). Note that this company, Webster (linked above), can make you a 60", today, in 2013. So you can have a home scope bigger than pro scopes from the 60's-70's. Guys are buying these things and building their own observatories.

[Helvetic]

Back to topic:

Parallex Factor Debunked:

ISON'S Debris Trail/Parallex Factor DEBUNKED, August 23, 2013

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=dzEOkpmjKjk

Parallex Factor DEBUNKED.