WADE FRAZIER : A Healed Planet

[Hughe]

Black Holes never existed. Really?

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=fsWKlNfQwJU

Stephen J. Crothers
http://www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com/

The Big Bang universe was dead many years ago by astronomers like Halton Arp.
Seeing Red: Redshifts, Cosmology and Academic Science, 1998

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Mf5y6PJR5lE

The Big Bang Never Happened

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=1yTfRy0LTD0

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Hughe:

Since I became involved on the fringes of the Velikovsky controversy back in the 1990s, I have been aware of Arp’s work. Maybe the steady state universe model is the right one, but it is all irrelevant to our lives today, except for the stuff that leads to FE.

Heck, I am going to put up a draft of another chapter of my essay. As with the others, the links and references will not appear.
My take on cosmology is that since we have not even left our solar system yet, and I know that the UFO/ET cover-up is very real:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#attack

then who is to say how the vast universe really works and is built? We have barely left the cave.

Best,

Wade

The Orthodox Framework and its Limitations

In the West, the conception of the physical universe and humanity’s ability to manipulate it has remarkably changed in the past few thousand years, which has been a tiny fraction of humanity‘s journey on Earth. Thousands of years ago, Greek philosophers Democritus and Leucippus theorized that the universe was comprised of atoms and the void, and Pythagoras taught that Earth orbited the sun. Greeks also invented the watermill during the same era. Hundreds of years later, a Greek mathematician and engineer, Hero of Alexandria, invented the first steam engine and windmill. Western science and technology did not significantly advance for the next millennium, however, until ancient Greek writings were reintroduced to the West via Islam. The reintroduction of the Greek teachings, and the pursuit of their energy technologies, ultimately led to the Industrial and Scientific Revolutions.

Scientific practice is ideally a process of theory and experimentation that can lead to new theories. There are three general aspects of the scientific process. First, facts are adduced. Facts are phenomena that everybody can agree on, ideally produced under controlled experimental conditions which can be reproduced by other experimenters. Hypotheses are then proposed to account for the facts. The hypotheses are usually concerned with how the universe works, whether it is star formation or evolution. If a hypothesis survives the fact-gathering process – often by predicting facts that later experiments verify – then the hypothesis can graduate to the status of a theory. Scientific theories ideally can be falsified; they can be proven erroneous. The principle of theory falsification is what distinguishes science from other modes of inquiry.

Early in the 20th century, radical theories were proposed that remade scientists’ view of the universe. Along with relativity and quantum theory, a primary pillar of today’s physics is the notion that everything in the universe is a form of energy, as summarized by Einstein’s equation: E = MC2. Although the notion is still challenged in unorthodox corners, today’s prevailing theory is that the universe came into being in an instant called the Big Bang, and stars are the energy centers in the observable universe, powered by nuclear fusion. When the Big Bang supposedly happened, there was no matter, only energy. Only when the universe had sufficiently expanded and cooled, less than a second after the Big Bang, did matter begin to appear, which is considered to be comprised of relatively low energy states. This essay hews fairly closely to today’s orthodox perspective for much of it. However, there will be limitations, and some of them follow.

In the early days of science, it had a quasi-religious stature among its practitioners, and nineteenth-century scientists were prone to calling their hypotheses and theories “laws.” An astronomer colleague stated that there are no “laws” of physics, only theories, but the term “law” is lodged deeply in the scientific lexicon, although by the twentieth century scientists stopped calling new hypotheses and theories laws. Modest scientists readily admit that the so-called “laws” of science are not the “laws” of the universe, but human ideas about what those laws might be, if there are any laws at all. As Einstein and his colleagues readily admitted, the corpus of scientific theory barely says anything at all about how the universe works. Sometimes, paradigms shift and scientists see the universe with fresh eyes. The ideals and realities of scientific practice are often at odds. Ironically, when scientists reach virtual unanimity on a theory, it can be a sign that the theory is about to radically change, and most scientists will to go to their graves believing in the theory that they were originally taught.

Perhaps the most significant challenge to mainstream science is the fact that numerous advanced technologies already exist on Earth, including free energy and anti-gravity technologies, but they are being actively kept from public awareness and use. They and other exotic technologies developed in the above-top-secret world operate on principles that make the physics textbooks resemble cave drawings. Thousands of scientists and inventors have independently pursued such technologies, but all such efforts have been suppressed by a clandestine and well-funded effort of global magnitude. But this essay will lay most of that aside, other than to note that one of Einstein’s protégés, David Bohm, theorized that space is anything but empty. Einstein also stated that his general theory of relativity resurrected the idea of an ether that his special theory of relativity supposedly rendered obsolete. According to Bohm’s computation, the energy existing in “empty space” is great enough that it contains more energy in a cubic centimeter of it than is currently considered to be contained in all the mass of the known universe. One of Fuller’s pupils not only subscribed to the notion that “empty” space is not empty, but he built technologies that harnessed that energy source, and his life’s story, like my former partner’s, is hard to believe, but nevertheless true. But, black projects and “leading edge” theory aside (theory that is far older than I am), technologies have been publicly available for many years whose operation upends some of science’s oldest theories. “White science” (establishment science) has great defects, especially when its pursuit conflicts with deeply-entrenched economic and political interests.

Also, although the greatest physicists were often mystical in their orientation, they rarely explored the nature of consciousness in the way that modern human potential efforts have. When I was sixteen years old, it was demonstrated to me, very dramatically, that everybody inherently possesses psychic abilities, which invalidates the materialistic theories of consciousness. Millions of people had similar experiences during that era. They are usually life-changing events, available to nearly anybody who devotes the time to experiencing them, but a politically-active arm of establishment science, known as organized “skepticism,” has waged a holy war against such evidence for longer than I have been alive. The scientific establishment’s warriors often denigrate such phenomena as “pseudoscience,” which is a term that they have greatly abused as they attacked ideas and phenomena outside of their ability to investigate or conflicted with their materialistic assumptions.

The holy warriors’ efforts aside, the scientific data is impressive regarding what has been called “psi” and other terms, clearly demonstrating abilities of consciousness that are still denied and neglected by mainstream science. But direct personal experience is far more valuable than all of the experimental evidence that can be amassed. There is nothing like doing it yourself.

Not all mainstream scientists relegate consciousness to a mere byproduct of chemistry. John von Neumann’s interpretation of quantum mechanics is that consciousness is required for the wavefunctions that describe fields at the subatomic level to collapse into observable particles. He was not the only scientist whose theories required consciousness to exist in order for the physical universe to become observable. To the end of his life, Einstein was very uncomfortable with the implications of quantum theory, and his disquiet was ahead of its time. The greatest physicists knew that materialism was a doctrine built on unprovable assumptions, which amounts to a faith. Forthcoming quantum physicists regard the controversy over the implications of quantum theory as “our skeleton in the closet.”

Mainstream (“White”) science still has almost nothing to say about the nature of consciousness. However, Black Science (covert, largely privatized; the same province where that advanced technology is sequestered) is somewhat familiar with the nature of consciousness, and considers it to be far more than a byproduct of chemistry. The assumption that the entire universe is a manifestation of consciousness is not only unassailable by White Science, but is likely the foundational assumption of Black Science and mystics.

The battle between materialists and the religious orders over the years, where materialist evolutionists grapple with creationists and intelligent design proponents, seems to be a battle between two fundamentalist camps. The nature and role of consciousness, both in this dimension and beyond it, are likely far too subtle to be profitably engaged by the level of debate that currently dominates. Scientists such as Einstein were awestruck by the evident intelligence behind the universe’s design, but that did not mean that they believed in a God with a flowing beard.

White Science does not really know what energy is; it can only describe its measurable effects. At its root, there are only two primary components of our universe: energy and consciousness. Everything physical is made of energy, and our consciousness is all that we know. Energy and matter may well be manifestations of consciousness, and large brains are simply more refined “transducers” for more complex consciousness to manifest in physical reality. There is substantial evidence that evolution is not purely the province of chance mutations, but that organisms can direct their evolution at the genetic level.

The greatest scientists readily admitted that the theories and data of physics, that hardest of the hard sciences, drew highly limited descriptions of reality, and those scientists were usually, to one extent or another, mystics. If textbook science falls far short of explaining reality, what can be said within its framework that is useful? Plenty. Our industrialized world is based on textbook science, and feats such as putting men on the Moon were performed within the parameters of textbook science.

The mainstream theory is that matter consists of elementary particles (which are all forms of energy), and combinations of them are responsible for all mass. Almost all mass in the known universe consists of the protons in hydrogen atoms, and those protons are in turn comprised of quarks, and electrons and neutrinos are the other first generation fundamental particles. Protons have a positive electric charge, electrons a negative electric charge, and neutrinos no net electric charge. The simplest atom consists of one proton in the nucleus and one electron in “orbit” around it, which is the most common hydrogen atom. Today, mainstream science recognizes four forces in the universe: gravity, electromagnetism, and the strong and weak forces in an atom’s nucleus. Gravity attracts matter to matter, and is thought to be responsible for the formation of stars, planets, and galaxies. The universe seems to be built from processes, not objects.

The Standard Model of particle physics is complex, but the above presentation is largely adequate for this essay’s purpose, while it can be helpful to be aware that the physics behind free energy and antigravity technologies will likely render the Standard Model obsolete. If free energy, antigravity and related technologies finally come in from the shadows, the elusive Unified Field may come with them, and the Unified Field might well be consciousness, which will help unite the scientist and the mystic. But that understanding is not necessary to relate the story that White Science tells today of how Earth developed from its initial state to today’s state, where complex life is under siege by an ape that quickly spread across the planet like a cancer once it achieved the requisite intelligence, social organization, and technological prowess.

With the above limitations acknowledged, this essay will explore the earthly journeys of life and humanity, and energy’s role in them.

[sandy]

Hi Wade,

I think the below statement in this draft will keep me chuckling all night and at the same time impact the senses into knowing we have to own up to our responsibility in creating the mess we are in.....love it!!


"where complex life is under siege by an ape that quickly spread across the planet like a cancer once it achieved the requisite intelligence, social organization, and technological prowess."

[transiten]

The atom has no core and no particles, it's the flipping of "on and off on and off" of vibrations. They will never find "the particle of God" they are chasing in this hughe plant in Switzerland.

Nothing = No Thing = energy/vibration and there's no boundary between the "physical" and the "mind" as we all know on Avalon.

[Ilie Pandia]

Oh, I can hardly wait to dive my teeth into this essay: ... great preview.

[Wade Frazier]

Hi all:

According to Adam T., the Higgs field is just one more name for the ZPF:

http://projectearth.com/founder-essa...firmed-by-cern

and I certainly won’t deny it. Again, my essay will largely stay within the bounds of establishment science, because it works fine for gaining an understanding of how energy runs the world and always has, and in fact, energy is all that there is in our universe.

What I have posted up as drafts will undoubtedly look different when the final version is published. I will likely put up some previews of other chapters as the months pass.

That chapter preview that I just put up is one of the few places where I will point out the limitations that I see in the orthodox framework, and I’ll sketch others, but I know that there is no way that I am going to come up with some new kind of physics. It would all be a bunch of theory, anyway. I am more into the data, but that is under deep wraps:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/camelot.htm#underground

So, on that alternative physics and its resulting technologies, readers will have to do the work to get comfortable that my experiences are genuine, and those of my fellow travelers. There are not many of us. There are many pretenders, but only a few contenders, and with people such as Brian O passed on, and others taken out in a variety of lethal ways, our numbers have dwindled.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Not that it will surprise any of my readers, but below is a draft of the essay's introduction.

Best,

Wade

This Essay’s Purpose

These are challenging times for humanity, in which the survival of our species and the ecosystems that support our existence are questionable. However, the future can be very bright if enough of humanity overcomes its inertia and can overcome the organized suppression that has removed solutions to our predicament from public awareness and use. This essay was written with the intention of helping the second scenario manifest, while also preventing the first from happening. My background led me to writing this essay.

I was a key member of what is arguably the most sustained and successful effort yet made to bring alternative energy technology to the American marketplace. Contrary to my business school indoctrination, there is nothing resembling a free market in the USA, particularly in its energy industry, and there has never been a free market anywhere or anytime, a true democracy, a free press, an objective history, a purely pursued scientific method, or any other imaginary constructs that our dominant institutions promote. They may all be worthy ideals, but none have ever existed in the real world. Regarding free markets in the energy industry, reality has effectively been inverted, with the world’s greatest effort of organized suppression preventing alternative energy technology of any significance from public awareness and use.

My life was wrecked by the global oligarchy’s efforts to eliminate the threat that we presented but, before that, my partner was offered around a billion dollars to terminate our operation. I eventually understood that that offer was not unusual, not for the threat’s magnitude. I also came to learn that technologies that could permanently solve humanity’s energy situation have existed for longer than I have been alive, and close colleagues (1, 2) have witnessed such technologies in operation. Those technologies can produce virtually unlimited, environmentally harmless energy. Many other technologies have been systematically suppressed, such as antigravity technology, which could turn the human journey into something that resembles Star Trek. I have spent about half of my life so far considering the implications.

But the people who effectively run the world have prevented those technologies from achieving public awareness and use, although they have extensively developed those technologies for their use. This situation is not some armchair conspiracy theory; I am simply reporting my experiences and those of my few fellow travelers. I have called the controlling group the Global Controllers, and others have different terms for them. However, they are not the focus of my writings. I regard them as a symptom of our collective malaise, not a cause. Our fate is in our hands, not theirs.

I noted several crippling weaknesses in all alternative energy efforts that I was involved with or witnessed. Most importantly, when my partner mounted his efforts, the participants primarily became involved to serve their self-interest. While the pursuit of mutual self-interest is the very definition of politics, self-interested people were easily defeated by the organized suppression, although the efforts usually self-destructed before the suppression efforts became intense, as greed, delusions of grandeur, and the like seduced the participants.

Another deficiency was that most participants were scientifically illiterate and did not see much beyond the possibility of reducing their energy bills or becoming rich. Once the effort was destroyed (and they always are, if they have any promise), the participants left the energy field. Also, many lives were wrecked as each effort was defeated, so almost nobody was able or willing to pick up the pieces and try again. Every time my partner rebuilt the effort, it was primarily with new people, with few individuals lasting for more than one attempt.

Soon after I completed my present website in 2002, one of R. Buckminster Fuller’s pupils called my writings “comprehensivist,” and I did not know what he meant. I then read some of Fuller’s work and immediately saw the point, and my work since then has been more consciously comprehensivist (also called “generalist”) in nature. What is called comprehensivist or generalist I used to call a “big picture” view, and that scientific illiteracy and self-serving orientation helped prevent the energy effort’s participants from seeing that big picture.

This essay is intended to draw the big picture of life on Earth, the human journey, and the role of energy, in as comprehensive terms as I can make them. The references that support this essay are largely to works written for laypeople. I did that so that non-scientists can study the same works, without needing specialized scientific training. I am trying to help form a comprehensive awareness in a tiny fraction of the global population, with around five-to-ten-thousand people being my goal. My hope is that the energy issue can become the focus of that tiny fraction. Properly educated, that tiny fraction might be able to help catalyze an energy effort that can overcome the obstacles. That envisioned group may help humanity in many ways, but my primary goal is manifesting those technologies in the public sphere in a way that nobody has to risk their lives or livelihoods. I have seen too many wrecked and prematurely-ended lives in this milieu (1, 2), and plan to avoid those fates, for both myself and the group’s members.

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

A few odds and ends…

As usual, it is surreal for me to see stuff like that meteorologist who vowed to never fly again after seeing the latest IPCC report:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...ise-criticism/

I have yet to see a scientist like that who ever got past Level 3:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level3

Holthaus could literally do a million times as much good as ceasing to fly as he could by poking his nose into FE a little ways, far enough to at least seriously consider the idea. While he is well-meaning, his “solution” is along the same austerity lines as the environmentalists:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/purpose...ironmentalists

Peak Oilers:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/hooked.htm#austerity

and so on. I have tried reaching people like him, as did Brian O (actually, Brian O was a scientist like Holthaus who got past Level 3, so some have existed, but I can almost count them on one hand, who came from Brian's background and progressed how he did on the FE issue):

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#reactions

as have others who have had access that I never will. Nobody is home, anywhere, and for aspiring choir-members, they need to understand that fact. Those kinds of people will not be the target audience. There is no group on Earth ready to listen, but those who the songs are intended to reach are scattered across the planet, like needles in haystacks.

I am currently writing what may be my hardest chapter, both for the author and the readers, where I cover concepts in chemistry and energy, to provide a foundation for understanding the journey of life on Earth. The chapter will end with something like:

For this essay’s purposes, the most important understanding is that for virtually all life on Earth today, and for all complex life, captured sunlight is its sole energy source. All chemical cycles in complex organisms are ultimately powered by solar energy (other than those who feed on chemosynthetic organisms, and even they are dependent on solar energy). Today’s hydrocarbon energy that powers our industrial world comes from the energy of captured sunlight. Exciting electrons with photon energy, then stripping off electrons and protons and using their electric potential to power biochemical reactions, is what makes life on Earth possible. Too little energy, and reactions won’t happen (such as ice ages, enzyme poisoning, and the darkness of night), and too much (such as ultraviolent light and temperatures too high for enzyme survival), and life is destroyed. The journey of life on Earth is all about adapting to varying energy conditions and finding levels where life can survive. For the many hypotheses about those ancient events and what really happened, the answer will always be in energy terms, such as how it was obtained, how it was stored, and how it was used. For the life scientist, that is always the framework, and they devote themselves to discovering how the energy game was played.

Back to chores.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

It is time once again to reiterate my intention and strategy. My goal is a healed humanity and Earth, as I think is obvious. What still seems to be hard to comprehend is my strategy, even by people who are trying to understand.

As my coming essay will make the case, energy is the be-all, end-all of life in the physical universe. Energy makes it all happen. But while I acknowledge the mystical aspect of energy, and in fact suspect that the ZPF is divine in nature, almost all of my work on “energy” approaches it how scientists do. Most New Agey types deal with energy in very airy-fairy ways, such as male “energy,” female “energy” and so on. Those terms are pretty meaningless, IMO, and I don’t see how they will help us turn the corner. The energy issue, as energy is looked at by scientists, is the most important way to view energy right now, and it takes some scientific literacy to understand. Around 95% of the population is scientifically illiterate, which is one of the big strikes that FE efforts have against them. Almost nobody really understands the energy issue, not in how it runs the world and provides the foundation for all life and all human activities. Even mainstream economists understand that oil is the “master resource,” although almost none of them can seem the fathom the USA’s economic incentive to slaughter millions of people to steal their oil and gas:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post652292

The grim death toll never even enters their analyses, them being largely cheerleaders and intellectual warriors for the capital class.

My initial orientation was the technical end of the energy issue, going back to when I was a teenager:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#introduction

and after some damned voice suggested that I study business, my late twenties were spent on the business aspect of the energy issue, and I got handed my head:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#hitting

When the dust settled in Ventura and my life was shattered, I came to the stark realization that the primary reason for humanity’s predicament is that personal integrity is the world’s scarcest commodity:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#burn

and I resisted that realization every step of the way until I had it beaten into my head in no uncertain terms. Nobody who has challenged or denied that understanding has any experience at all in playing at the high levels, as they often go charging off to learn the hard way, if they survive the experience. There simply is not enough personal integrity in any “clumps” on Earth today to go try the technical/business/hero’s route to free energy and a healed planet. It is a dead end, but every newbie, and I mean every newbie, goes blithely charging onto that battlefield (or has "bright idea" boy-general suggestions for those who are), thinking that he/she has the magic answer. It is like 18-year-old boys who have never seen a battlefield:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/war.htm#business

and I really don’t want to watch as they sally forth. After realizing that none of those paths had a prayer, and losing interest in what people such as Dennis were doing, no matter how heroic their deeds:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...rec#post694872

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/lessons.htm#howmany

I hit the books and began to find out why almost nothing that I was taught about how the world works was true.

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/lessons.htm#books

Along the way, I met people such as Brian O, who was beginning his own adventures in the FE field:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#meet

and we traded notes and I watched him try the academic’s/scientist’s route of raising awareness, and as I suspected, nobody was home, anywhere:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#reactions

Brian eventually wondered if humanity was a sentient species:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#sentience

and I sadly understood his query. We also found that nobody was home amongst those who we thought might be allies or at least interested in healing the planet. Not the environmentalists:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/purpose...ironmentalists

not the Peak Oilers:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/hooked.htm#austerity

especially not the New Agers:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/purpose.htm#newage

and I found out that those in the FE field itself are really not helpful allies, as they almost uniformly fail on the integrity issue, or their naïveté is potentially fatal:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...red#post621892

and newbies such as Foster definitely do not have the right stuff. While I had great respect for what people such as Brian and Dennis were doing, risking their lives to make a dent, their efforts did not have a prayer, which I realized as I carried their spears.

So, I am trying something different. I am not asking people to pass some kind of high-level integrity test, because almost nobody has ever passed one of those, for those who survive the experience. But I also saw that almost nobody kept their eye on the ball, getting caught up in all manner of distraction, hacking at branches that were meaningless, and so on. In a way, I am trying to do what Fuller attempted, which was training people to be comprehensivists:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/roots.htm#fuller

When people develop comprehensive perspectives, they may be able to keep their attention on what is important and let the other stuff fade into the background where it belongs. But people cannot really develop comprehensive perspectives while they maintain their allegiance to the scarcity-based, egocentric ways of thinking that feed them:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#dominant

I know that I am looking for needles in haystacks, and that search will begin before long. I found a few at Avalon, and I don’t kid myself that the task will be in any way easy, but I have nothing better to do with my time.

Best to work.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

As my readers know, if people get past FE denial, one of their favorite entrenched positions are Pandora’s Box fears, the Level 5 reaction:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level5

It comes in many guises, but it comes down to the view that people cannot be trusted with freedom. Of course, as far as I have seen, Level 5 people always exempt themselves from that group that can’t be trusted. I have two big problems with that. The first is that such a perspective is obviously egocentric, where the Level 5 person sees themselves as wise, but the rest of humanity are idiots who can’t be trusted with freedom (this is a common affliction with FE inventors, believe it or not). The second is that history has shown that before any freedom event, there are all manner of people saying how people were not ready for freedom. Before slaves were freed, the “they are not ready for freedom” talk was common. See the American South’s rhetoric before the Civil War to get an idea of what I refer to:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery...#Justification

http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h244.html

And the whites have been limiting black freedom ever since, with more subtle ways than chattel slavery, although racism is rightfully under siege in the USA, as is sexism, ethnic bigotry, etc.

But the bigger issue is that before all of humanity’s epochal events, which were always primarily energy events:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post674575

where humanity tapped into a new energy source that was orders of magnitude greater than before, if somebody would have seen protohumans before they learned to control fire, or hunter-gatherers before they domesticated plants and animals and created civilization, or England on the cusp of the Industrial Revolution, a common observation, probably even the dominant one, would be, “They are not going to be able to handle it!” Well, they always handled it. There were obviously downsides to each epochal event, but human welfare always went up, dramatically, and none was more dramatic than the Industrial Revolution. In many corners, there has been a great deal of romanticizing of the past, thinking that living in the rainforest like apes was some ideal, or the hunter-gatherer ideal, or the village life ideal, or the noble peasant ideal, but they were far from wonderful.

There is no Golden Age of the human past that anthropologists have ever been able to find. Life for preindustrial peoples was always nasty, brutish, and short. For the very few who climbed to the top of the steep food chain, life could be “good,” with harems, monumental architecture, having religions justify your “divine” status, and so on. But for the rest, who made up 99.99% of the population, life was not so good. Today’s average American lives better than the world’s richest man of three centuries ago did.

But energy is still relatively scarce, hence the USA’s genocidal invasions of the Middle East and central Asia, and that is how Godzilla likes it, because if he can keep energy artificially scarce and centrally-controlled, he can easily control humanity. If Godzilla had to make a public statement to justify his position, he would likely say that humanity is not ready for the freedom that FE would bring, although, like those Southern aristocrats in the American South in 1860, that is a lie to hide the fact that he just loves being the master of the slaves, and he has enslaved an entire planet. Godzilla and Peak Oilers such as Heinberg:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/hooked.htm#heinberg

the environmentalists:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/purpose...ironmentalists

and “progressives” such as Amory Lovins:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#reactions

make for very strange bedfellows. The fact is that for each epochal event, there was not some kind of “raising of awareness” beforehand so that people could handle the change; it just happened. And the event was often very coercive in nature, where the peasants of England and Scotland were forcibly removed from the land as they then became the Industrial Revolution’s workforce. For the FE revolution, the last thing that I advocate is coercion, but the planet is not going to raise its awareness on the FE scale by talk. It just won’t happen that way, all the New Agey bromides aside. As with the other events, when people experience the new energy regime, they will begin to wake up to its potential, just as Machiavelli said:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#machiavelli

With the global scale of the organized suppression, there is no way that a hero like Dennis can scale the ramparts. But in order for FE to manifest in the public sphere, there at least has to be some awareness and action, and that is what I am attempting to initiate. But those people will be needles in haystacks. History will likely call them visionaries, because they will be advocating something that does not yet exist, at least in the public sphere. In the end, the people who make FE happen will be no different than the first band of apes that learned to control fire, the first people who domesticated a plant or animal in their vicinity, or the first industrialists. It was only when the change was evident that the common people began to catch on. It became obvious that if machines could do the work of humans, that slavery was a doomed institution. It will become obvious that FE means economic abundance, and exploiting ecosystems for human benefit will quickly be seen as primitive under the new energy regime, just as slavery is now seen as primitive.

Back to work,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

As an addendum to the previous post, when I see those Level 5 fears rear their heads, at its root it comes in two basic flavors, but it is usually couched in a false one by its proponents. The voiced fear, as far as I have seen, is the fear that we would destroy the planet, but it is kind of a crazy one. We are doing a great job of destroying the planet with our current energy-acquisition methods. FE is the only way that we can have our energy-acquisition methods be environmentally harmless and usher in an epoch of abundance, where the standard of living of all peoples makes Bill Gates look like a pauper. Nothing else remotely has the potential to do that.

But the real fears are of two varieties, which revolve around the epochal changes that FE present:

1. The Level 5 proponents cannot imagine what the changes might all be, and most importantly...

2. The Level 5 proponents do now know where their place in that world might be.

For the first one, for none of the previous epochal changes could the people making the changes imagine where it all would lead. The control of fire and the enlarging protohuman brain led to humans, and imagine protohumans foreseeing what their energy practices would lead to. There is no way that the protohumans making the first fires or sitting around them had any idea what it would lead to. Similarly, the first super-predator humans had no idea where their journeys would take them. Three new continents were “discovered” by those super-predators. Similarly, the first people who domesticated crops would not have had any inkling that their invention would lead to cities. Simple metals would have been some kind of magic. Cities were totally unprecedented in the journey of life on Earth. There is no way that any of those early agriculturalists and herders could have fathomed what their activities would eventually spawn. Similarly, take a European peasant from 1500s Europe or China and transplant them to Times Square and see what happens. Their minds would be completely blown. The most mundane aspects of our daily lives would completely befuddle such a peasant. Just a light bulb would be magic. Imagine that peasant even seeing a TV, much less surf the Internet. Planes and rocket ships would stun them. When Ishi came in from the ruins of his world:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ishi

as he was being given a tour of San Francisco, he saw a plane in the air. When told what it was, he laughed in astonishment. He was taken to an opera, and the entire time he just stared in amazement at all the people. He had never seen that many people in one place, ever.

Telescopes, microscopes, cars, phones, plastic, and so on would be so far outside of that peasant’s experience that they would be incomprehensible. Socially, the idea of female equality, the idea that slavery was obsolete, and so on, would have been equally bizarre.

While I have spent half of my life pondering the ramifications of FE:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/abund.htm#abundance

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/lessons.htm#advanced

I know that I can barely imagine it, but I sure don’t fear it. What the Level 5 people fail to understand is that in a world of abundance, nobody needs to worry about where they will fit in, because where somebody “fits in” will have nothing whatsoever to do with survival and a standard of living that makes Bill Gates look like a pauper. Everybody has ready access to that stuff as their birthright, and nobody thinks that there is not enough for everybody. In fact, making sure that everybody has access to the good stuff is an underlying principle.

So, the real fears of the Level 5 people are silly and reflect pure projection of the past, not any realistic consideration of what the future could look like. Imagine that hunter-gatherer trying to project his hunter-gatherer mentality on what civilization would be like. He would not have the slightest idea what it would look like. Fortunately, we do have some clues as to what an FE-based world could look like:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post672748

So, we are not flying as blindly as those previous pioneers. We have many advantages over the pioneers of those previous epochal changes, and fearing it is just dragging our baggage along with us, not really looking forward.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

For anybody that begins to understand the potential magnitude of FE's effect on on the human journey, it can be overwhelming. That is why one early pitfall for FE aspirants is delusions of grandeur:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/conun.htm#grandeur

There are many reactions by those new to the FE milieu, and I came up with a framework to help organize the thousands of reactions that I have seen over the years:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#chart

but it really only hits the highlights, and is simplified. I could break the levels into sublevels, such as Level 7 attempts to avoid the organized suppression, including:

1. Finding powerful patrons who can provide protection from Godzilla (they don’t exist, as far as I have seen, but the “White Hats” can come close, although those I am aware of are likely arms of Godzilla, so that kind of “help” is going to be dubious if not an outright trap);

2. Hiding from Godzilla by working on FE prototypes in secret, financing in secret, sneaking them onto the market, and so on;

3. Finding public avenues that Godzilla does not influence/control (sorry, but they do not exist);

4. Finding some nation or enclave where Godzilla’s influence is muted, and do it there (I have been hearing this one for nearly thirty years – that place does not exist on this planet).

And the levels are not mutually exclusive, I have seen some of those Level 7 strategies used in Level 10 and other level attempts. I have watched people rattle around between the levels, as they progress, backslide, drop out, come back, and so on. But, the framework can help people understand the many unproductive reactions that people have to the idea of FE. I am shooting for a Level 12 attempt, trying the comprehensivist, choir-based, sentient lamb’s approach. My attempt may end up “only” being complementary, helping to form a pool of heart-centered sentience that can help create an environment where an FE effort stands a chance. Or, it may be the missing ingredient to take FE over the top. I don’t know. It is possible that Godzilla is going to try to derail it before it gets going, but I hope that this is seen as low enough on the “threat” scale that he does not lash his tail at it:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/risk.htm#graphic

A big part of my strategy is keeping my effort low enough on the “abrasion” scale where people are not risking their lives to be involved. I am looking for singers, not soldiers, but the entire FE field is in a state of arrested development, dominated by tinkerers, scientists, and would-be moguls, and most male newbies want to rush off and go “do something,” but the choir will not be the place for them. The “do something” people are a danger to themselves and others in this field. If they actually go do something (almost nobody ever does, but talk is cheap), then they will be playing on the FE battlefield, the kind that leads to these kinds of experiences:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/lessons.htm#howmany

But I don’t encourage anybody to sign up for that war. While newbies can think that “only” singing is not doing anything, gaining a comprehensive perspective:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#developing

is anything but easy. I have spent a lifetime developing it, and I know that I am only scratching the surface with my own efforts. My upcoming essay will be the initial work, or “hymnal,” if you will, for the choir to form around. It won’t be for quick-study artists. It will be much more challenging to read than my medical racket essay, for instance:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/medicine.htm

It will kind of be my energy essay:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy.htm

grown up, after twelve more years of study, after I understood what “comprehensivist” meant:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/roots.htm#fuller

There are days when I doubt that I am up for the task of writing that essay, or won’t have the time to do it right, but I think that I’ll pull it off adequately, well enough to get a choir going. But the material is going to be very challenging, and nobody is going to really understand its many dimensions and how they interrelate without deep study and reflection, the kind that takes many years. This thread at Avalon has been a warm-up, but only a warm-up. I will be likely creating the choir’s forum under my own domain, as I need to control it. I am going to be very particular on whom I will invite into it, and if it starts with three people, it does. It will be all about hitting the notes, not how loudly they are sung, or how many sing it, or how many people initially hear it. It really will be something different. I am regularly approached by people who suggest that this or that talking head out there is doing what I am. I have searched, and nobody is doing it. The FE milieu is a pretty small cottage industry, and nobody from the field has remotely attempted what I am about to, and nobody from outside the field is really qualified to, although I see many try, and the pretenders abound.

What Brian O, Adam T., Greer, Bearden, and Dennis have done could be considered aspects of what I will be doing, but they are really only aspects of it. I learned from all of them and have great respect for them, but am really doing my thing. It will be different, so different that I know of nothing quite like it. I don’t know if it will help all that much, but it can’t hurt, and “do no harm” has been my mantra in the FE milieu, after I saw all the wrecked and prematurely-ended lives. I don’t want to help add to that bloody tally.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

To hone in more closely to my strategy, my work has virtually never been designed for mass consumption, and that will be doubly true for my upcoming essay and subsequent work. My “peers” – white, educated, American men – can only read a few pages of my work before blowing a fuse, as it takes a meat ax to our imperial conceits. I have watched them go off like Roman Candles after reading this section, for instance:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/intro.htm#progress

FE newbies regularly think that my work is for mass consumption, as they try to turn their friends, families, and colleagues onto my work. I have seen relationships end that way, and nearly careers. A recent infotainment forum, or it could even be called a dis-infotainment forum, is TED. While I have strong doubts about the validity of Hancock’s ancient civilization stuff, Sheldrake’s work is pretty tame and hard to argue against. His The Science Delusion is a straightforward challenge to materialism, which is effectively a religion. I know that materialism is an invalid philosophy, as do most people who have been trained to perform remote viewings:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/spirit.htm#brown

have had NDEs, and so on. But the “skeptics” are holy warriors for materialism and the establishment, and they succeeded in getting Sheldrake’s talk banned from TED:

http://blog.ted.com/2013/03/14/open-...ert-sheldrake/

The “skeptics” who attacked Sheldrake are the usual suspects, and they can’t honesty string together enough rational thoughts to make coherent arguments. They confuse the process of science with their materialist assumptions, and irrationally call irrational anything that is not materialistic. I am continually amazed at how supposedly intelligent people can’t think straight. They ought to become familiar with the mystical writings of their heroes:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy.htm#mystical

My point here is that places like TED are thoroughly establishment venues, and they have banned all things non-mainstream under the rubric of pseudoscience:

http://circularstateofmind.wordpress...tegory/tedx-2/

Carl Sagan must be smiling somewhere:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/dennis.htm#sagan

Anybody with much experience in this field knows that FE talk is attacked wherever it appears, and if there are conferences and the like devoted to it, then look out, because untimely deaths:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#portland

raids, prison:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#mr

and the like will attend such efforts, even in The Land of the Free. Such gatherings are simply crawling with CIA personnel and Godzilla’s agents. Those are some of the realities that FE faces, and I am trying to do something very different. Showing up to a conference is easy. Much harder is doing to work to achieve a comprehensive understanding, and that is what I am shooting for. Not only are social gatherings unnecessary for what I am doing, it removes an easy avenue of organized suppression.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

[Izheheruvim]

Hi, Wade

Probably someone somewhere in the thread raised a similar concern. If so, please just give a link to your website or wherever it's been addressed. And the concern is this: why do you believe that FE issue, if resolved, is going to help humanity in the most profound way? Ideologies, including religions, might have some connection to the patterns of energy consumption but they cannot be explained only in these terms. It's more about workings of the collective unconscious and how they seep into both the collective and individual conscious, if i am to use Jungian language. I personally see energy as a tool for something much more deeper. It can restrain or magnify it, nor doubt, but will always play a subordinate role.

Let's imagine the following scenario. A generation of young men and women is raised on the premise of mass consumption and cultural values borrowed from Hollywood, pop singers, i.e. Lady Gaga, Kanye West, Britney Spears, etc., mass media and the state ideology. Probably many people here would agree that it's not the best hotchpotch. And these young people are given FE. What kind of life would they live if whatever restrains them, and here the lack of energy is seen as the major culprit, drops off? Maybe i'm too pessimistic here but vulgarity, shallowness, and ugliness is most likely to flourish unless a better ideology is provided, or maybe not just an ideology but a sort of spiritual awakening. So, what would you see as a counter-weight to whatever has been damaged spiritually in these people? And speaking more generally, what life on earth would you personally like to see in terms of relationships, activities, spirituality, etc?

[Robert J. Niewiadomski]

Hi Izheheruvim,

The spiritual shallownes and escapism is a result of survival/victim mindset baked into those youngsters from the cradle. And that survival mindset being baked into them is a result of (artificial) energy scarcity. Banish that scarcity and young people will not have to escape from reality into shallow "entertainment". That's the logic behind freeing up Free Energy imho...

When children mature they subconsciously feel something world changing is about to happen in their lives. Some magic gate is about to open. And instead flying to the stars they are put into daily grind... It takes mountains of integrity to overcome that despair and various kinds of shortcuts and cutting corners temptations... All because of that pesky 1st law of thermodynamics...

EDIT:
Have found a quote from Joseph Chilton Pearce (Crack in The Cosmic Egg, Magical Child) to accompany my argument:

My feeling for most of my life has been that we have an absolutely unlimited possibility within us, and an equal amount of self-imposed limitations. For every possibility, we have a self-imposed limitation. This is the story of our species; we have infinite potential, and yet we also have incredible impositions just blocking everything. From about ages 5 to 7, I had the idea that the sky was the limit, but then all of a sudden school came along, and with it came this enormous weight of restriction. Again, that's kind of the general story of our species.

Source: http://www.realitysandwich.com/we_ar...chilton_pearce

Mr Pearce quotes several times in his work, David Bohm's calculations of amount of energy available at our disposal in every cubic centimeter of quantum vacuum all around us. So he is aware of FE and publicly advocates it's use Although at the level 19 on Wade's scale...

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Izheheruvim:

My essay will deal very directly with that question. Indeed, it is almost the entire point of the essay. But yes, it has been covered in plenty of places on this thread and on my site. For now, I’ll just point to the epochal importance of the previous energy breakthroughs:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post674575

In brief, all of today’s dominant ideologies would become obsolete with FE:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#dominant

because FE would mean the end of scarcity. That would be for starters. Survival issues would become obsolete:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post736407

Today, people are so conditioned by scarcity that the idea of abundance scares them:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post739089

As I was writing this, I saw Robert’s post, and it is a brilliant one. The grind of scarcity indeed begins in the cradle, and the crude and often self-destructive ways that people attempt to briefly escape from their misery would disappear pretty quickly with FE and abundance. Love and FE are joined at the hip, in practical and mystical ways:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy.htm#greatest

The people who run the world know how “disruptive” FE would be to their reign of scarcity, which is why FE is suppressed as thoroughly as it is:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#make

FE would be a quadrillion dollar technology for starters:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/risk.htm#quadrillion

but that is the small stuff. The big stuff is healing the planet and humanity. With FE, this kind of world can begin to come into view:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post672748

I’ll let you chew on that for a while.

I’ll give another little essay preview. I am still writing what will likely be the essay’s hardest chapter for me to write, where I deal with many concepts of physics and chemistry, and cover the earthly events that preceded the Cambrian Explosion. I have touched on some of the information elsewhere:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/upcoming.htm#footnotes

It can be astounding to consider how many seminal events in the history of life on Earth likely happened only once, and then proliferated across the planet. Events that are currently considered to have happened only once are:

1. Life appeared on Earth (if it did not appear only once, it appears that all life on Earth today is descended from one life form, known as LUCA today http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Last_Un...ommon_Ancestor )

2. Photosynthesis was invented;

3. Oxygenic photosynthesis was invented (by cyanobacteria);

4. An archaean enveloped a bacterium, which became the ancestor of all mitochondria, which is the energy generation center in all animals, and that symbiotic union became the first complex cell;

5. A complex cell enveloped a cyanobacterium, which became the ancestor of all chloroplasts, which is the primary energy generation center in all plants (plants also have mitochondria, but photosynthesis supplies the energy that the mitochondria burn).

Along with the “invention” of enzymes, which speed up chemical reactions by millions of times and make life possible, those are the critical energy events of life on Earth, and they all likely happened more than a billion years ago. What has happened since then is the small stuff. Photosynthesis still powers all life on Earth, and it is primarily oxygenic photosynthesis (except for the chemosynthesizing microbes, but they are still dependent on the Sun and oxygenic photosynthesis, which "sets the table" for them to play their chemosynthetic games). Virtually all animals breathe oxygen. The basics have not changed in more than a billion years.

As I have written plenty, the epochal events in the human journey:

1. The control of fire/growing the protohuman brain;

2. Moving to the top of the food chain;

3. Domesticating plants and animals;

4. Tapping fossil fuel energy;

were all primarily energy events, and similar to those seminal energy events of more than a billion years ago, each event was initiated by a very small group of people, the “inventors” of their time. The breakthrough was quickly copied as its benefits became obvious, and it was the epoch after the event when the cognitive changes came for the masses. In each instance, the lives of the masses became unrecognizable compared to life before the epochal event. FE would be the biggest epochal event, by far, where a Star-Trek-like existence awaits us. As my work makes very clear, I am trying to help form a critical mass of awareness that can catalyze that epochal event. For this one, paradoxically, the technical breakthroughs have already happened:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/camelot.htm#underground

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#sweet

but humanity’s inertia and addiction to scarcity, along with the organized suppression, have proven completely effective in preventing that technology from being used by the masses. In this regard, humanity has been its own worst enemy, with almost nobody having productive reactions to the situation:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#chart

I am trying to help change that, but as with humanity’s other epochal events, it is going to be a very small group of people who make the breakthrough. If I eventually form an abundance choir of 5-10K people, I think it would be enough to catalyze the change, and nobody would need to risk their lives, either.

Back to work,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Briefly, I am regularly bombarded by newbies and allies who see something on YouTube or elsewhere on the Internet, and they contact me, saying, “Wade, here is somebody who is doing what you are!” That has never been the case. Every time that I look, the person is playing at one of the levels below Level 12 (such as 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, and 11), or advocating Level 19 (which is completely impractical at this stage of the human journey, and usually reflects the typical New Agey naïveté and magical thinking http://www.ahealedplanet.net/purpose.htm#newage):

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level19

Brian O was the closest person that I have seen to my perspective, but Brian was playing the Level 10 game to a significant degree:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#nem

I have not seen anybody on Earth come close to what I am trying to do, which is create a Level 12, comprehensive-awareness choir. If I found anybody doing it, I would likely ask to join their choir and abandon what I am doing. But there is not anybody else with my experience and approach, so I have to roll my own, so to speak. That I keep getting hit with “they are just like you” stuff means that those pupils and allies are not really doing their homework, or maybe they don’t have the talent to be discerning. I don’t think that it is that hard to become discerning, but I could be wrong. Discernment will be a key ingredient in becoming a successful member of the choir, and it is possible that only experience will give a person the necessary discernment. That one is still a bit of a mystery to me, but when I see people like Ilie in action, it gives me the idea that the learning curve does not have to be all that steep for those needles in haystacks that I will be looking for.

Back to work,

Wade

[Izheheruvim]

Posted by Robert J. Niewiadomski (here)
Hi Izheheruvim,

The spiritual shallownes and escapism is a result of survival/victim mindset baked into those youngsters from the cradle. And that survival mindset being baked into them is a result of (artificial) energy scarcity. Banish that scarcity and young people will not have to escape from reality into shallow "entertainment". That's the logic behind freeing up Free Energy imho...

Thank you, Robert

I have a somewhat different reasoning though: a highly spiritual being can be raised on the very premise of energy scarcity. The fear can be channeled in a positive direction, i.e. respecting Mother Earth and using Her resources in a modest and rational way. I believe that Japan could serve as an example in this regard, at least before it incorporated "modern values", or pretty much every economy that had been somehow limited in its natural resources and yet retained much of its spiritual potency. To explain everything in human psyche in terms of energy scarcity would be a bit reductionist approach, don't you feel? And isn't it true that those raised in wealthy families on the premise of their personal abundance, however scarce other people's lives may be, tend to be less spiritual and concerned about others' well-being, especially when certain deleterious family values are passed on them and shape their psyche?

Wade, i checked out most of the links you kindly provided. I believe that my answer to Robert is pretty much in line with what i could have answered to you. So i am looking forward to reading your essay where strong evidence will be presented that energy scarcity has been the most important factor in spiritual life of people.

Peace

P.S. Don't get me wrong, i can clearly see how many advantages humanity will get when provided with FE. It's all about certain gross manifestations of psyche that would get unleashed in this case, all things being equal.

[Izheheruvim]

Probably this video doesn't fit quite well in here, but i thought it's relevant to our discussion:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=u6XAPnuFjJc

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Izheheruvim:

YouTube cartoons fall far short of the kinds of conversations that I prefer. In order to begin to understand my work, people need to begin thinking epochally, and that takes many years of experience and study, even for those who are so inclined, and there are not many of those walking on Earth today. I doubt that my essay will convince you of anything. At your age, it can only be a starting point for many years of hard work and deep contemplation.

When I was your age, I was only beginning to figure it out, and as I become an old man, I get glimmers of what might be called a big picture understanding. So-called spirituality has always been dependent on the political-economic foundation that it rode upon, which was always rooted in the level of energy consumption. Three centuries ago, slavery was considered “normal” and was even justified by the Old Testament.

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post738993

Several hundred years ago in Europe, burning people alive at the stake was normal, and in the Western Hemisphere at the same time, torturing war captives to death was normal, and cutting out people’s hearts as they still beat within their chests was normal and an offering to the “Gods” who provided energy in the form of food.

Two millennia ago, forcing people to murder each other for entertainment was normal.

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/war.htm#gladiator

Fifty millennia ago, wiping out all of Earth’s large animals that had not yet learned to fear humans was normal.

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/upcoming.htm#_edn5

In Japan not that long ago, suicide was “honorable,” and in China, killing infant girls was normal, and all of those activities were firmly planted within the “spiritual” traditions of all of those peoples. As standards of living have risen, people rightfully look at those “traditions” in horror, which were all rooted in economic scarcity. FE means abundance, and almost nobody on Earth today can even begin to imagine what that means. Today’s so-called spirituality will be seen as almost unrecognizably primitive under a political-economic system founded on FE.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade