The Death of Princess Diana

[Cidersomerset]

some more info:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...ter-crash.html

Thanks Leon, this sounds to me she knew it was an assassination attempt
and she thought the Doctor was there to finish her off. Which possibly
happened in the ambulance on the 2hour ( 10 min trip ) to Hospital.
Just one of many suspicious events that evening.

The 13th pillar , Cameras switched off , White Flash gun,
Fiat Uno who driver was found suicided, MI6 team in Paris
ETC ETC ETC.....



THE TELEGRAPH.....

»News»UK NewsPrincess Diana 'agitated' in minutes after crash

The scene of Diana's fatal car crash
Diana was sedated in the minutes after the crash
By Megan Levy and agencies
3:12PM GMT 19 Nov 2007

Diana, Princess of Wales, was so frantic in the minutes after her
car crashed in a Paris tunnel that doctors had to restrain her, the
inquest into her death has heard.




Full coverage of the Diana inquest

The Princess was shouting and thrashing her arms around,
and pulled out the drip a doctor tried to insert into her arm
while she was still trapped in the vehicle.



Dr Jean-Marc Martino, an emergency specialist who oversaw
the Princess's treatment from shortly after the crash, recalled
Diana "shouting and saying things in English which were
comprehensible yet incoherent".

Professor Andre Lienhart, who later investigated all aspects of
her treatment for a French investigating magistrate, told the
inquest today of Dr Martino's account.

Prof Lienhart said an assistant had to hold the Princess's arm
by force to get a drip in but she quickly pulled it out.

"Due to the agitation, the first line, the first drip was removed,"
he said, speaking by video link from Paris.

"She was agitated, she refused treatment ... he decided to
inject some drugs to reduce the agitation, for her to accept treatment."

The inquest also heard that Diana's rare injuries suggested
her heart had been thrown violently forward inside her chest
when the car crashed in the Pont de l'Alma Tunnel in Paris.

There were no recorded cases of patients with the same
injuries arriving at hospital alive, the court was told.

Prof Lienhart said he concluded that the Princess, who
was not wearing a seatbelt, might have been sitting
sideways when the car crashed into a pillar in the tunnel.

"There was a very strong and brutal rotational movement,"
he told the jury.

The inquest continues.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...ter-crash.html

[KiwiElf]

Of course, if this is true, the unanswered question is, "who ordered it?" - KE

SAS 'assassinated Princess Diana'
Yahoo! New Zealand September 16, 2013, 1:38 pm

http://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/-/world/1...rincess-diana/

A former soldier told his wife Princess Diana was murdered by the SAS after they shone a light into her driver’s face, according to reports in the British media.

The ex-SAS sergeant, who is only referred to as Soldier N, is reported to have told his then-wife a former member of the elite squad was in charge of an assassination squad.

Princess Diana, Dodi Al Fayed and their driver Henri Paul were killed in the crash in 1997.

The extraordinary claim is reported to have happened after Soldier N had taken Prince William on an advanced driving course in 2008.

It is reported Soldier N’s ex-wife told Scotland Yard last month that her husband had revealed the secret after a conversation about the Prince’s driving course.

The couple are now separated but the conversation occurred while they were still together.

“We were talking about it and I was saying how lovely it was that Princes William and Harry were doing so well and that it was sad that their mum wasn’t here to see it,” the wife said according to a source, reports the Sunday Mirror.

“Then he said one of the guys was responsible for the accident, for the death of Diana. I was shocked. I believed what he said.

“He went on to tell me that it had to be done in a tunnel, that people had been monitoring them - a light was shone in the driver’s eyes."

When pressed on details, her husband said that the SAS had been following Diana and Dodi Al Fayed on the night they were killed and a light was shone into the Paris tunnel before the car crashed.

He also intimated it was because the royal inner circle disapproved of Diana’s relationship with Fayed.

It is believed the revelations could have been the trigger for Scotland Yard’s reported decision to reopen the case 16 years after Diana’s death.

In separate reports, the Sunday Express claimed it has been revealed Princess Diana’s phone had been bugged and the investigation could unearth recordings of the crash.

[charlesfrith]

I urge you to watch it as it never lasts long and it is excellent

[Anchor]

Don't just watch it - download it and show it to other people!

[Soulboy]

The fact that it's banned in the UK is VERY telling. Looking fwd to it. Remember the time just before it was meant to come out and then observing how it got banned. THANKS to Bangkok for that, Charles!

[kersley]

I can hear music but nothing else?????

[sdv]

When I saw this thread, I thought 'Another conspiracy video full of manipulation of facts to support a sensational opinion'. It's not. It's very good ... probably the best I have seen on the whole sad affair.

[Gardener]

Thank you !
Many very pertinant points raised.
In particular the perception management by the press/media about the verdict. They led people to believe it was accidental death caused by papperazzi by the way they worded it.

It was NOT 'ACCIDENTAL DEATH' and it wasn't the paperazzi.

The verdict was 'UNLAWFULL KILLING'

[Eram]

Also, they deducted two plausible motives for the killing:

1: Diana was pregnant or soon going to be pregnant, bringing muslim blood into the Windsor Lineage, with the possibility of Prince William having a muslim half brother...... how embarrassing.
2: Diana managed to get major media attention toward the movement that wanted to ban all anti personnel mines from the world. With the convention that was going to decide about this coming up soon (in Oslo), she was becoming a real risk to the powers that don't like to see a ban on these mines. With Diana now dead, the convention got only about 0,1 % of the attention that it would otherwise have had and all world leaders (accept Bill Clinton) could now safely vote to keep the anti personnel mines as a means of warfare. Incredible !!!

One question that I would like an answer for is:
Which of those two parties are most likely to be able to manipulate the whole show that got Diana, Dodi and the driver killed and the whole cover up afterwards. I mean, this cover up was done on many levels, high up the food chain.

[Hazel]

An expose of how the tide of change is about to become a sunami over the House of Windsor..

Banned material traditionally ensures U-ltra / X-treme volumes of attraction, controversy and suspiscion...

such folly on behalf of 'the establishment'

many thanks for posting it here Charles

[charlesfrith]

John Morgan answers all your questions. https://youtube.com/watch?v=VWIT0hW_ruo Google other interviews to get the full picture.

[EYES WIDE OPEN]

Bump. Its still up!

[AlaBil]

Thanks for the bump Eyes Wide Open. I had missed this earlier when it came around.

[EYES WIDE OPEN]

Keith Allen will be talking with David Icke TOMORROW on the launch of his new channel: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post755437

[Nick Matkin]

I'll watch or download it. But if the all knowing, all seeing Powers That Be can't eliminate it from the internet, they're either doing a piss-poor job, or the internet is much harder to control than we're told.

Which is it?

Unfortunately even with 'serious music' running through this documentary, I have no idea if any of the reported 'facts' are true or not, But I'm sure they will be presented to make it look like there was a conspiracy to kill her. Another edit with other 'facts' will make it look like nothing of the sort.

I'll just have to decide on what is presented. But I wasn't there. I don't know!! Neither do 99.9% of people watching know what really happened.

I'm sure it will be interesting, thought provoking and entertaining if nothing else...

Nick

[Nick Matkin]

Well I've just watched it. Fascinating! Thanks Charlesfrith for posting.

If the information the documentary is true, then indeed sinister forces do lurk within the British establishment.

I think it's understood by thinking members of the public that there are areas where the media dare not dig - even here...

What leant the documentary credibility for me were the fairly well-known and respected talking heads used throughout.

But if the all knowing, all seeing Powers That Be can't eliminate it from the internet, they're either doing a piss-poor job, or the internet is much harder to control than we're told.

Which is it?

Neither! On reflection, I suspect it's something that David Ike worked out some time ago; if 'The Powers That Be' prosecute (which they could easily do, and win of course) it just draws the public's attention to an issue which they'd prefer left undisturbed. On the other hand, if such stories ever emerge, then those exposing or believing them are exhibited as being unhinged fantasists by...the media!

I think members on this forum are familiar with this modus operandi are we not...?

Nick

[Cidersomerset]

Keith Allen is about to go on the People voice now....

http://thepeoplesvoice.tv/watchnow/index.html

Theres was a technical sound hitch, he's on now.

no hes not .LOL still a sound problem !!

------------------------------------------------------

Well that was a not what I expected it was just
a hello basically.

[Cidersomerset]

The People’s Voice With Sonia Poulton: Keith Allen talks about death of Diana, Princess of Wales (Wednesday Dec 11, 2013)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=_SqJOsm-60w

Published on 11 Dec 2013


Keith Allen talks to Sonia Poulton about his film in which he looks at the death of Diana, Princess of Wales, and the establishment cover up.


BBC ROYAL CORRESPONDENT SLEPT DURING DIANA INQUEST....

[Tesla_WTC_Solution]

In case people don't know, Keith Allen is the director of the film "UNLAWFUL KILLING" (2011),
produced by Dodi Al Fayed's father, who believes with good reason that the Royal Family (UK) intentionally harmed Diana, and furthermore, prevented the administering of medical help which may well have saved her life -- contrary to the press.

Take the following with a grain of salt; Wikipedia's most sensitive articles are often plagued by people with a vested interest in hiding what really happened.
There is tremendous opposition, particularly in and from England, to the idea that Princess Diana's death was no accident.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unlawful_Killing_(film)

Unlawful Killing (film)

Unlawful Killing is a 2011 British documentary film, directed by Keith Allen, about the deaths of Diana, Princess of Wales and Dodi Fayed on 31 August 1997. It was financed by Mohamed Al-Fayed and Associated-Rediffusion[1] and shown in Cannes while the 2011 Cannes Film Festival was in progress.[2]

It argues that the British and French authorities covered up uncomfortable facts about the crash, accuses Queen Elizabeth II and Princess Margaret of being 'gangsters in tiaras', and alleges that Prince Philip is a psychopath, in the mould of British serial killer Fred West,[3] who orchestrated the murder of Diana and Dodi.[4] It also alleges that Diana's life could have been saved had she been taken to hospital quickly and efficiently, and condemns the inquest into her death for failing to investigate why this action was not taken. It perpetuates the long-standing allegation by Al-Fayed that the Royal Family was opposed to Diana's relationship with Dodi due to his religion.

Martyn Gregory, author of a book on the Princess of Wales' last days, has described the film as "ludicrous". He said: "It simply regurgitates everything Mohamed Fayed has been saying since the year 2000. It is rehearsing the Planet Fayed view."[3]

Lawyers asked to advise on the film by the producers said it would need 87 cuts before the film could be certified for release in the United Kingdom. It was not shown there.[1] However, the director believed that it would make money in the US, where conspiracy theories about the Princess of Wales' death still have a following.[3] Despite this optimism, it proved impossible to gain insurance against possible litigation in the United States, and the film was withdrawn.[5]

People need to vote this up!

p.s. the Astrology of Diana

http://accessnewage.com/articles/astro/headiana.htm
http://www.astrotheme.com/astrology/...ncess_of_Wales

[Cidersomerset]

Mohamed al Fayed brands latest police probe into Diana's death a "whitewash"

MOHAMED al Fayed has said he will continue his fight to prove his son Dodi and
Princess Diana "were murdered" after Scotland Yard dismissed sensational claims
that the SAS were involved.


By: Peter Allen and John Twomey
Published: Wed, December 18, 2013




Following a four-month review, the Yard has today said there is “no credible or
relevant evidence” that the elite soldiers were involved.

But that has been branded as a "whitewash" by al Fayed's legal team, who say the
grieving father is convinced that one day he will be proved right.

Scotland Yard launched a probe after it was revealed that an SAS sniper boasted
how Diana and Dodi’s chauffeur was blinded by a fierce flash of light shortly before
they were killed in the Paris car crash in August 1997.

The claims were made in a letter written by the mother-in-law of the SAS sergeant
– known only as Soldier N – to police and Army chiefs in 2011.

Nothing was done by the authorities until this summer when Soldier N was a
witness at the court martial of fellow SAS sergeant Danny Nightingale.

The Yard refused to launch a full-scale inquiry and described their probe as
a “scoping exercise”.

However, detectives interviewed the ex-wife and former in-laws of Soldier N who all
remembered him making the sensational claims. The SAS man was also questioned
and it is understood he denied making the claims.

Assistant Commissioner Mark Rowley revealed the Yard’s ­conclusions in a letter to
the interested parties including the Royal Family and Lord Justice Scott Baker who
presided over the inquest in 2008.

Mr Rowley wrote: “Having reviewed relevant records and taken accounts from
principal parties, the conclusion the investigative team has reached is that, whilst
there is a possibility that the alleged comments in relation to the SAS’s involvement
in the death may have been made, there is no credible or relevant evidence to
support a theory that such claims had any basis in fact.

“Having reviewed the exercise and its findings, I am satisfied that there is no
evidential basis upon which therefore to reopen any criminal homicide investigation
or refer the matter back to the coroner.”

Details of the letter were leaked ahead of the official announcement today.

Today Mr al Fayed's lawyer Simon McKay said his client was "disappointed" by the
outcome, calling the "so-called scoping exercise" the latest "whitewash in a 16-year
cover-up".

He added: "The Met should never have been given charge of the case as they had
every incentive to return the result we now see. To have done anything else would
have called into serious question their own Paget Report of 2007.

"The case of Soldier N should have been rigorously investigated by the Royal
Military Police.

"Mr al Fayed will continue his fight to establish the truth that they were murdered
and is convinced he will succeed in doing so."



http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/449...S-killed-Diana