+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Corbett Report on 'Rockefeller Medicine'

  1. Link to Post #1
    UK Avalon Member Corncrake's Avatar
    Join Date
    9th September 2010
    Location
    London
    Posts
    763
    Thanks
    4,315
    Thanked 2,867 times in 660 posts

    Default Corbett Report on 'Rockefeller Medicine'

    Have just been listening to the Corbett Report on 'Rockefeller Medicine' posted by Giovanni on his 'Godless Gatherings with a Lust to Share' thread. It features extracts with Eustace Mullins whom I have not come across before but evidently did a lot of research into the Federal Reserve in the late 1940's on behalf of Ezra Pound and went on to write a book that was later updated and republished as the Secrets of the Federal Reserve. He then wrote Murder by Injection published in 1988. Of course he has been damned by some of those in the mainstream as a 'conspiracy theorist'. I think the video is worth giving a thread of its own:


  2. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Corncrake For This Post:

    Camilo (4th November 2013), genevieve (4th November 2013), Hervé (4th November 2013), Lefty Dave (4th November 2013), meeradas (5th November 2013), Peace&Love (4th November 2013), rgray222 (4th November 2013), Snookie (5th November 2013), TargeT (4th November 2013), tcjim1 (5th November 2013)

  3. Link to Post #2
    Avalon Member grannyfranny100's Avatar
    Join Date
    20th April 2010
    Location
    Bay City, MI
    Posts
    1,058
    Thanks
    2,859
    Thanked 3,855 times in 877 posts

    Default Re: Corbett Report on 'Rockefeller Medicine'

    Rockefeller was not dumb. Prescription meds meant profit. The herbs used by homeopaths meant no profit. He and his foundation cooked up a long term plan to achieve their objective: take over hospital medical schools with financing, place his minions on the boards, orient medical education to big pharma and subsequent graduates would have no frame of reference for herbal medicine. This approach worked

  4. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to grannyfranny100 For This Post:

    Camilo (4th November 2013), Corncrake (4th November 2013), genevieve (4th November 2013), Hervé (4th November 2013), Peace&Love (4th November 2013), Snookie (5th November 2013)

  5. Link to Post #3
    Hungary Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    13th June 2013
    Posts
    268
    Thanks
    2,927
    Thanked 1,729 times in 236 posts

    Default Re: Corbett Report on 'Rockefeller Medicine'

    As an MD i totally agree with what you wrote grannyfranny100.

  6. Link to Post #4
    Canada Avalon Member
    Join Date
    25th January 2011
    Location
    Alberta
    Posts
    780
    Thanks
    7,695
    Thanked 2,648 times in 689 posts

    Default Re: Corbett Report on 'Rockefeller Medicine'

    I'm tempted to send this to my sweetie's son (who is a Dr) & granddaughter (who is going to Med school), in the hope it will wake them up.

  7. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Snookie For This Post:

    grannyfranny100 (5th November 2013), Peace&Love (5th November 2013)

  8. Link to Post #5
    Avalon Member grannyfranny100's Avatar
    Join Date
    20th April 2010
    Location
    Bay City, MI
    Posts
    1,058
    Thanks
    2,859
    Thanked 3,855 times in 877 posts

    Default Re: Corbett Report on 'Rockefeller Medicine'

    A friend, MSW, is counseling a medical student in his residency. He is having a tough time reconciling his caring reasons for being in medicine with the cold reality of the field. He can't drop out with all his educational loans. What a tough realization.

    Once and a while someone like Regina Meredith now on Gaiam interviews someone who has their M.D. but skewed his path and adds other perspectives and/or credentials to their work. Often they are attacked/raided by FDA or IRS and have to leave the U.S. to practice medicine on their own terms.

    Some peer reviewed medical journals are slanted because they are often underwritten by big pharma. Even non profits such as the Cancer Society are not open to research proposals that seem too close to alternative medical approaches. Some M.D. may be close to getting a grant, the organization's leadership changes and the grant is disallowed.

    The few M.D.s I have found who add an adjunctive approach to their practice are often outcasts and put down by their peers in a community. In one place where I lived there were many closed practices and I had to promise to stop seeing an outcast doctor before being allowed to be a patient in a local primary care practice. I suspected this outcast doctor could read auras and used this as part of his way to diagnose patients and then confirm with traditional testing procedures. Mind you he never would admit to seeing auras but that is what I thought.

    Another M.D. who practiced traditional allopathic medicine also practiced NAET which I found very helpful for allergies. One side effect was I no longer had a cat allergy even though we weren't directly working on that allergy. During one session, he entered my treatment room overjoyed because he managed to ended a Japanese girl's allergy to rice and she could now enjoy the traditional cuisine of her family's heritage. They were stationed in my local midwest community by a Japanese company. If one looks at allopathic speciality of allergies, that speciality is still using techniques which are the same ones I experienced 50 years ago!

    Or consider Dr. Mercola with his nutritional online approach. He donated a million dollars to the anti GMO fight in CA. All these anti GMO folks are just asking for a choice through labeling. They aren't focused on a demand to end GMOs. In the current Washington state battle, Monsanto and DuPont, etc. are being joined by Kellogs and other food manufacturers indirectly through the grocery manufacturers organization so their big names aren't mentioned directly.

    Meanwhile international stats on health care do not have the U.S. as number one any longer despite all the high tech devices used here. People like the Chinese do bring U.S. doctors to China to enhance and integrate Western medicine in their country but one does not read of U.S. MDs going to China to explore their approaches.

    We may not burn witches at the stake any more but the forces of the old paradigm sure have on heck of a bag of tricks to keep medical progress for moving forward.

  9. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to grannyfranny100 For This Post:

    Peace&Love (5th November 2013), TargeT (5th November 2013)

+ Reply to Thread

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts