Barack Obama 2014

[Shezbeth]

Hmmm. I don't know which of the following is their agenda, but the following are probable intended outcomes.

1. She gets more power (fame, sales, popularity, attention, political influence, etc.)
2. He gets equated with - wait for it - John F. Kennedy. What, you thought I was gonna say Clinton? He's next.
3. Rand Paul's "Clinton was a sex predator" work gets flushed in the public eye, as does any shot he had at the white house. Additionally, nostalgia plays its part and the people will want Clinton again, except THIS time,.... What better way to usher a new Clinton (who would 'have to beat Bush' by the way, another "win" for the people) than by invoking the 'laughable player',... who will play a most crucial part in Hellary's (I just made that up to my knowledge!) campaign.
4. Oh! Obama could be the first prez to ditch the old lady (and pawn the blame for who knows what on her). That one is more of a stretch, but I'm calling it anyway.

There's more causes/effects, those are just the big juicy ones I can see.

[Cidersomerset]

There was an article in the mail a few weeks ago,




So, Michelle and Barack Obama: What IS the state of your union? Rumours their 21-
year marriage has been racked by screaming rows, allegations of infidelity and a
string of jealous fights

Rumours surround frostiness between the couple in recent months
Reports claim they are now sleeping in separate bedrooms
Notorious selfie with Danish PM was the 'last straw', sources claim
Newly-slim First Lady 'planning her own life' for after end of husband's term


By Caroline Graham

PUBLISHED: 22:15, 1 February 2014 | UPDATED: 12:37, 2 February 2014


It is the question that has been dominating Washington dinner parties for weeks –
could the once-golden First Couple of the United States really be heading for the rocks?

If rumours are to be believed, the 21-year marriage of Barack and Michelle Obama
has been racked by screaming rows, allegations of infidelity and a string of jealous
fights.While the White House has refused to comment on the reports there has
been a distinct frostiness in the air between the couple in recent months.


DECEMBER 10, 2013 Not amused: Stoney-faced Michelle grits her teeth and rolls
her eyes skyward as Obama snaps his now infamous 'selfie' with Danish Prime
Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt and David Cameron at Nelson Mandela's memorial

According to a report in the National Enquirer – which plastered ‘Obama Divorce
Bombshell!’ across its front page – the pair have been at loggerheads since last
summer and are now sleeping in separate bedrooms.The ‘final straw’, apparently,
was Michelle’s outrage when her husband publicly humiliated her by openly flirting
and posing for his now infamous ‘selfie’ photograph with Denmark’s glamorous
blonde Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt at Nelson Mandela’s memorial service.

According to published reports, Mrs Obama is only standing by her 52-year-old
husband until his presidency ends.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz2swVh9mrQ
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[SilentFeathers]

She's been a regular fixture in the White House for years now......wouldn't surprise me if it's true. But usually when one hand is pointing at something it's best to try to see what the other hand is doing.


"I didn't have sexual relations with that woman, you know, that woman Beyonce"

[Pweeky]

I had the feeling that Obama didn't go up that road..

[Operator]

All your guesses are as good as mine ... I was totally surprised to find this as headline news.
Since it wasn't posted here I created this thread. And apparently something along these lines
did not break yet in the US as news. I wonder why the Washington Post would be waiting till
tomorrow .... anyway still surprised about this news.

[Cardillac]

then there have been reports (true or not?- I don't know- but I think the source was the WorldNetDaily website) of Obama and Rahm Emanuel having membership to a gay bath house in Chicago- sometimes I just don't know what to believe anymore-

but interestingly enough (or not) during the time of the Vancouver Olympics (and I can't recall anymore the topic of the article) one anonymous blogger in this article stated "Obama's children are not his biological children- he is sterile"-

now normally I would completely disregard such a brazen, undocumented statement but for some strange reason this hit my solar plexus like a battering ram and I immediately shot this off to a former, very dear Afro-American co-worker (figuring she wouldn't think 'they all look alike') and she immediately wrote back:

"This wouldn't surprise me in the least; I've never felt either of his children bear any physical resemblance to him whatsoever"-

it's obviously just her own personal opinion and maybe others would disagree- but there continues to be be an incredible shroud of mystery surrounding the US president-

stay well all-

Larry

[spiritguide]

Here is more on POTUS....

http://caravantomidnight.com/archive...dioArchive.mp3

First broadcast for John B. Wells formaly of C2C now with his own program.

Link to web site....

http://caravantomidnight.com

Peace!

[outerheaven]

Well, it sure would be an interesting way to hijack the headlines, eh?

I'm glad you posted the picture of Obama with Helle Thorning-Schmidt, Cidersomerset. At the time, I was wondering why that storyline was being promoted. IMO, everything about that Mandela memorial screamed psy-op, but I wasn't sure why the pictures of Michelle looking jealous and angry were being so heavily promoted. If they are hoping to embroil the POTUS in a sex scandal, it'd suddenly make a lot of sense.

And we're talking about Beyonce. Think of it. The public would go nuts. Forget hearing about any other news story while the revelations of Obama with the pre-eminent female singer/sex symbol rock the superficial US media and populace. You could bury any news story in that scandal. (Also remember the headlines questioning why Beyonce wore such a "stunning" dress to Michelle's birthday party. "Inappropriate!" the lambs screamed.)

So then, following this line of rhetoric questioning, I'd have to ask: why now? What do they want to cover up?

I don't think it's the NSA leaks, which seem to be co-opted as of now, if not from the beginning. Perhaps there's a major other story or event coming soon that they want to overshadow.

If this is true ... it will be huge news. Just not for the reasons the media will be talking about.

[Operator]

Posted by outerheaven (here)
So then, following this line of rhetoric questioning, I'd have to ask: why now? What do they want to cover up?

I don't think it's the NSA leaks, which seem to be co-opted as of now, if not from the beginning. Perhaps there's a major other story or event coming soon that they want to overshadow.

If this is true ... it will be huge news. Just not for the reasons the media will be talking about.

Perhaps it has to do with the topic of this thread: Courtney Brown Announcement for February 2014 ?
If so ... man, it may get pretty weird ...

[Harley]

I somehow just can't envision Borat . . . er, Barack doing something like this.

Now Michelle might be a different story!

[Shezbeth]

Posted by outerheaven (here)
And we're talking about Beyonce. Think of it. The public would go nuts. Forget hearing about any other news story [...] following this line of rhetoric questioning, I'd have to ask: why now? What do they want to cover up?

Spot on. Not only would this kill any current news story (Obamacare, NSA, Drones, Benghazi, Executive Orders, etc), it would probably flip the public opinion graphs upside down and serve to discredit ANY alternative scrutiny of more sinister activities (he can't even pull off an affair without getting caught! How's he supposed to __________ without anyone noticing?). My head tells me this is a build up for Clinton to the '16 elections, but my gut tells me that we won't know until it happens (meaning, it could be even WORSE x_x' ).

[freedom4all]

Maybe Freeman is Right!

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=vfHrsEAlyD0

[Milneman]

Or God forbid...maybe it's true.

Truth in media? NAH!

Remember this one from a couple of days ago, about Russian skater Irina Rodnina (Rosana Rosanadana...why did that come to mind?) posting racist photos about Obama?

http://www.mediaite.com/online/russi...oto-of-obamas/

Why do I have this sudden mental image of about 200 children in very expensive clothing in a school yard scheming about throwing rocks at each other....

[Selene]

Well, there was JFK and Marilyn Monroe....



Cheers,

Selene

[Harley]

But I agree that this may be by design.

If this hits the mainstream it will redirect EVERYONE'S attention away from what's really important.

Kinda gives you the feeling that something's in the air doesn't it?

[gripreaper]

Posted by Shezbeth (here)
Hmmm. I don't know which of the following is their agenda, but the following are probable intended outcomes.

1. She gets more power (fame, sales, popularity, attention, political influence, etc.)
2. He gets equated with - wait for it - John F. Kennedy. What, you thought I was gonna say Clinton? He's next.
3. Rand Paul's "Clinton was a sex predator" work gets flushed in the public eye, as does any shot he had at the white house. Additionally, nostalgia plays its part and the people will want Clinton again, except THIS time,.... What better way to usher a new Clinton (who would 'have to beat Bush' by the way, another "win" for the people) than by invoking the 'laughable player',... who will play a most crucial part in Hellary's (I just made that up to my knowledge!) campaign.
4. Oh! Obama could be the first prez to ditch the old lady (and pawn the blame for who knows what on her). That one is more of a stretch, but I'm calling it anyway.

There's more causes/effects, those are just the big juicy ones I can see.

Sounds like you nailed it. Reintroduce presidential infidelity into our consciousness though the Rand Paul article on Bill Clinton, make Obama the first president to divorce, set up Hillary as the first female president, and then trash the country and blame it on the breakdown of society. Tie in Beyonce, Miley Cyrus, Katie Perry etc. and their provocative moves as the catalyst.

Bingo. You destroy the family unit, aggrandize women, marginalize men, bring the country down and blame it on morals!

[Poly Hedra]

Or maybe she's a mind controlled?? Which is something that was alluded to be the case, not to mention the whole lot of coverage her videos get for being illuminati symbolism?? Or maybe shes also part of it, being a handler like Kris Kristofferson was accused of being Cathy O Briens daughters handler.
Cathy O Brien wrote all about Clinton and Hilary Clinton too, being sick people who assaulted her and her daughter.
We are all aware of the connection between, fame, power and what these people have to do to keep their power.

Just a thought.....

[SilentFeathers]

Posted by Harley Hawkins (here)
But I agree that this may be by design.

If this hits the mainstream it will redirect EVERYONE'S attention away from what's really important.

Kinda gives you the feeling that something's in the air doesn't it?

It is starting to hit the mainstream, but they are immediately saying it's ridiculous and untrue with lightening speed, hmmmm? How can the huffington post etc know so fast it's not true??????? either way the scrambling begins I was due for a good laugh....

ADDED: seriously though, something major is going on IMO...distraction and scandal run rampant now a days....

[SilentFeathers]

By the way, which Obama are they talking about?????


Beyonce and Michelle Obama have loved one another longer than I've realized. Since the Inauguration, the world is finally getting a chance to see that love ...

[Harley]

Posted by SilentFeathers (here)
By the way, which Obama are they talking about?????


Beyonce and Michelle Obama have loved one another longer than I've realized. Since the Inauguration, the world is finally getting a chance to see that love ...

That's the one!

Looks like bedroom eyes to me!