Courtney Brown Announcement for February (now March) 2014

[Synchronicity]

Posted by Paul (here)

Posted by Arc (here)
CB material sort of jives with other information sources ... Also, I think we have heard from other info sources ...

Exactly. That's likely key, in my half baked view, to understanding Courtney Brown's remote viewing (RV) research.

I speculate that it does not, cannot, view that which is far away in space or time, except and unless that humans or other such intelligent beings in the present have an awareness of it. I speculate that RV'ing is a process that can connect to that which other beings are aware of, in the "present", by means our conventional science is unaware of.

What is the exact meaning of the word "present" in the previous sentence depends on understanding the actual physics involved, which I do not understand.

The problem I see with using what is viewing in past is that unless there is other evidence available that is not based on RV, it can't truly be confirmed. I have seen RV work for other places, and that can be confirmed, but only if someone is aware of it to choose a target (if you are being specific for a location). And if you asked someone to RV to see what the airplane is, for instance, how can we know for sure if the viewer is really good at tuning into where it is unless all on board were dead and there was no way to read anyone's awareness of where it is. So I think there are times when it can be confirmed, but only in certain situations. The untwisting of the data and the possibilities of how the person got the information (if s/he did it is awesome however the method, but may not be RV in the strict sense) give the scientific confirmation of RV difficulties.

I see time and space as very fluid and basically human constructs, at least in the ways we use the terms, but I don't expect at this point in time for mainstream science to even be able to frame the relevant questions or tests, much less interpret results that are valid. If he has more evidence it would really help his case for the RV results. I don't think they are unbelievable, but they just aren't conclusive on their own in my view.

[sdv]

There is no good or bad in the universe, no reward or punishment (these are human constructs). There is just what we choose to be acceptable to experience and what we choose as unacceptable to experience, and since we live in a soup of billions of experiencing consciousness, all individual and all connected to the one experience, known or unknown, we are all hostage to others and what they choose to experience.

We can choose what we believe and what we experience, but we do so in an environment that is inhabited by billions of others who also make the same choices, and so we do not have the power that so much new age beliefs say we do.

My father was thrown out of his home by his father two years before he finished school. A sister rescued him and found him a job and as a self-made man, he became a manager and saved (gave his children the opportunity to get the education he never did) and when he retired was able to buy a car and house, paying cash, and support his grandchildren and himself and my mother (who lived for 10 years after he died). He always told me that if you think that money will buy you happiness and security, you will never have enough. He never cheated or abused others to gain wealth for himself, and was never an extravagantly wealthy man in the way he lived. At present, I am doing a freelance job for a company owned by a man who lives a very rich lifestyle (really lives the lifestyle of the uber rich ... ultra elite wealthy lifestyle). He is a cheapskate who cheats to gain more wealth for himself (I once heard him screaming and swearing at a man, and threatening to break his kneecaps, who owed him the equivalent of under $300 and then found out that the man was refusing to pay him because he owed the man $500). He walks around shouting 'You are here to make money for me. If you are not making money for me today, and every day, then why are you here'. He had a deprived childhood in that he was also out on the streets, alone and had to make his way to earning a living on his own from nothing. Two men in the same position who made very different choices and became very different men with very different beliefs and lifestyles, and very different ways of behaving.

I am not saying that anyone and everyone can be super wealthy if that is what they choose, but I am saying that two people with the same backgrounds have no actual control over what they can and cannot do with their situations (because we are all hostages to the billions of collisions between conscious beings every moment of every day) and that all we can control are the beliefs, the character and show we live out those beliefs and character.

Punishments, lessons, suffering are human beliefs and constructs, and they do not create a happier, healthier world for all. (I do not believe in nor support punishment and lessons. I do believe that we have the right to decide what we accept and do not accept. So, if we choose to not accept child rape and murder, we will banish those who commit these acts, and will choose to support those who suffer from this banishment, so we would support the families of those who are banished and those who were hurt by the one who has been banished. These are my beliefs and they are not shared by humanity and thus anyone who transgresses human-made rules is punished and the law is all about the accused trying to evade punishment. Punishment, if found guilty*, rehabilitation, and so on).

Courtney Brown has not revealed anything that will change these beliefs. Not for me. And he has provided no comprehensive proof of alien presence on Earth. Disappointing.

* Perhaps to be explored on another thread ... the Oscar Pistoriuos trial, to me, is not about innocence or guilt, but about him trying to prove that he lawfully murdered another person as an act of self-defence, as allowed by the law, so we as humanity do accept murder under certain conditions, and to persuade the judge that he should not be punished in any way for culpable homicide (his challenge of bail conditions shows that he does not want to accept any kind of censure).

Aliens, other humans, the forces of Nature ... all interfere with and determine our lives, and our power to change these influences are minimal and mostly non-existent. The character we develop, how we respond ... is on our control. That is all.

Now, Courtney Brown has added another bit of information in the field of study of the pyramids. Has what he has contributed created a threshold from one belief system to another? To me, No. But maybe someone can use his information as a part of a bigger picture and give people a crossing point for that threshold. I think that someone is going to do that.

By the way, so many of his implication postings came across as an advert for PA for me. He was simply talking about what already exists.

Finally, can I make an appeal about this making money stuff? How are people supposed to support themselves if they devote their lives to research and producing work that they must give away for free? Who are the sponsors and benefactors of these people? If I devote my life to writing and publishing books and I am supposed to give those books to others for free, then what or who gives me money for the roof over my head, the food I eat, the clothes I wear, and so on? In the past, artists (writers, poets, painters, sculptors, musicians, actors, scientists, esoteric researchers) had benefactors, and so much was produced that is now freely available to everyone today (in most countries, 70 years after your death, and your work is public property ... if you want to change that to work becoming public property on the death of a person, then I have no objections, but I am a creative writer and how can I devote my life to producing creative writing if I have no income).

Courtney Brown has made the data for the project freely available and is releasing three videos about the project, freely available. I have not encountered anyone on PA who has looked at the data (http://www.farsight.org/demo/Mysteri..._7_ryuseg.html). The video is an extra that he is marketing. You don't have to buy it, and if you don't buy it, you still have access to the data for the project, for free. Do you want free access to his interpretation so you can be told by him what to think and believe, or do you want to read the data and make up your own mind?

I have encountered this so often. In my country, a newspaper group used the law to get hold of documents regarding the President using state funds for self enrichment. They published all those documents. Then the Public Protector was asked to investigate. The government (hand-picked cronies by this corrupt president) have pulled out all the guns to discredit and stop the Public Protector. Everyone is waiting for her report so that they can be told if he is innocent or guilty. But all the documents are there, freely available, for everyone to read and see the truth for themselves.

The Courtney Brown video is for those who want entertainment and conclusions delivered to them. There are many who will pay for this. The truth is freely available for everyone in terms of the data on which the conclusions (as presented in the video) are based. As long as there are those who will pay for being given a conclusion, why should we condemn Courtney Brown for trying to raise funds for the institute?

Please get over this whinging about money.

Has his announcement changed your beliefs? Has his announcement given you vital evidence that supports your beliefs?

My answer to those two questions is no. Your answers may be different. Those who buy the video are not me. Those who condemn the existence of a video for sale are not me. Those who have not bothered to analyse the raw data (provided for free) are not me.

[Shezbeth]

Imagine a future in which humanity has advanced and evolved, to the point that humanity no longer suppressed the evolution of other life forms on earth. Imagine the cow started to evolve,....

Snap back to the 'now'. It would be a very long process transitioning from the point of 'Humans use cattle for livestock and food' to the point of 'Humans acknowledge and accept the sovereignty of cows and allow them to live freely and unobstructed'.

I suggest that these forms are not dissimilar to the forms that humanity is at now, except humans are the cattle that are trending toward sovereignty, and the aliens are the humans.

Specifically, if the cows started to evolve I can all but guarantee that humanity would first respond by crafting some sort of device or system to perpetuate the servitude/expendability of the cows. Perhaps the humans would tell the cows that the humans are gods, and convince the cows to exert the brunt of the effort to erect massive megalithic devices that would fascinate and beguile the cows.

[Synchronicity]

Posted by sdv (here)
There is no good or bad in the universe, no reward or punishment (these are human constructs). There is just what we choose to be acceptable to experience and what we choose as unacceptable to experience, and since we live in a soup of billions of experiencing consciousness, all individual and all connected to the one experience, known or unknown, we are all hostage to others and what they choose to experience.

We can choose what we believe and what we experience, but we do so in an environment that is inhabited by billions of others who also make the same choices, and so we do not have the power that so much new age beliefs say we do.

My father was thrown out of his home by his father two years before he finished school. A sister rescued him and found him a job and as a self-made man, he became a manager and saved (gave his children the opportunity to get the education he never did) and when he retired was able to buy a car and house, paying cash, and support his grandchildren and himself and my mother (who lived for 10 years after he died). He always told me that if you think that money will buy you happiness and security, you will never have enough. He never cheated or abused others to gain wealth for himself, and was never an extravagantly wealthy man in the way he lived. At present, I am doing a freelance job for a company owned by a man who lives a very rich lifestyle (really lives the lifestyle of the uber rich ... ultra elite wealthy lifestyle). He is a cheapskate who cheats to gain more wealth for himself (I once heard him screaming and swearing at a man, and threatening to break his kneecaps, who owed him the equivalent of under $300 and then found out that the man was refusing to pay him because he owed the man $500). He walks around shouting 'You are here to make money for me. If you are not making money for me today, and every day, then why are you here'. He had a deprived childhood in that he was also out on the streets, alone and had to make his way to earning a living on his own from nothing. Two men in the same position who made very different choices and became very different men with very different beliefs and lifestyles, and very different ways of behaving.

I am not saying that anyone and everyone can be super wealthy if that is what they choose, but I am saying that two people with the same backgrounds have no actual control over what they can and cannot do with their situations (because we are all hostages to the billions of collisions between conscious beings every moment of every day) and that all we can control are the beliefs, the character and show we live out those beliefs and character.

Punishments, lessons, suffering are human beliefs and constructs, and they do not create a happier, healthier world for all. (I do not believe in nor support punishment and lessons. I do believe that we have the right to decide what we accept and do not accept. So, if we choose to not accept child rape and murder, we will banish those who commit these acts, and will choose to support those who suffer from this banishment, so we would support the families of those who are banished and those who were hurt by the one who has been banished. These are my beliefs and they are not shared by humanity and thus anyone who transgresses human-made rules is punished and the law is all about the accused trying to evade punishment. Punishment, if found guilty*, rehabilitation, and so on).

Courtney Brown has not revealed anything that will change these beliefs. Not for me. And he has provided no comprehensive proof of alien presence on Earth. Disappointing.

* Perhaps to be explored on another thread ... the Oscar Pistoriuos trial, to me, is not about innocence or guilt, but about him trying to prove that he lawfully murdered another person as an act of self-defence, as allowed by the law, so we as humanity do accept murder under certain conditions, and to persuade the judge that he should not be punished in any way for culpable homicide (his challenge of bail conditions shows that he does not want to accept any kind of censure).

Aliens, other humans, the forces of Nature ... all interfere with and determine our lives, and our power to change these influences are minimal and mostly non-existent. The character we develop, how we respond ... is on our control. That is all.

Now, Courtney Brown has added another bit of information in the field of study of the pyramids. Has what he has contributed created a threshold from one belief system to another? To me, No. But maybe someone can use his information as a part of a bigger picture and give people a crossing point for that threshold. I think that someone is going to do that.

By the way, so many of his implication postings came across as an advert for PA for me. He was simply talking about what already exists.

Finally, can I make an appeal about this making money stuff? How are people supposed to support themselves if they devote their lives to research and producing work that they must give away for free? Who are the sponsors and benefactors of these people? If I devote my life to writing and publishing books and I am supposed to give those books to others for free, then what or who gives me money for the roof over my head, the food I eat, the clothes I wear, and so on? In the past, artists (writers, poets, painters, sculptors, musicians, actors, scientists, esoteric researchers) had benefactors, and so much was produced that is now freely available to everyone today (in most countries, 70 years after your death, and your work is public property ... if you want to change that to work becoming public property on the death of a person, then I have no objections, but I am a creative writer and how can I devote my life to producing creative writing if I have no income).

Courtney Brown has made the data for the project freely available and is releasing three videos about the project, freely available. I have not encountered anyone on PA who has looked at the data (http://www.farsight.org/demo/Mysteri..._7_ryuseg.html). The video is an extra that he is marketing. You don't have to buy it, and if you don't buy it, you still have access to the data for the project, for free. Do you want free access to his interpretation so you can be told by him what to think and believe, or do you want to read the data and make up your own mind?

I have encountered this so often. In my country, a newspaper group used the law to get hold of documents regarding the President using state funds for self enrichment. They published all those documents. Then the Public Protector was asked to investigate. The government (hand-picked cronies by this corrupt president) have pulled out all the guns to discredit and stop the Public Protector. Everyone is waiting for her report so that they can be told if he is innocent or guilty. But all the documents are there, freely available, for everyone to read and see the truth for themselves.

The Courtney Brown video is for those who want entertainment and conclusions delivered to them. There are many who will pay for this. The truth is freely available for everyone in terms of the data on which the conclusions (as presented in the video) are based. As long as there are those who will pay for being given a conclusion, why should we condemn Courtney Brown for trying to raise funds for the institute?

Please get over this whinging about money.

Has his announcement changed your beliefs? Has his announcement given you vital evidence that supports your beliefs?

My answer to those two questions is no. Your answers may be different. Those who buy the video are not me. Those who condemn the existence of a video for sale are not me. Those who have not bothered to analyse the raw data (provided for free) are not me.

Yes, I did read the evidence on the site, actually, and some others may have as well.

And no, I have no problem with someone making a living by any means. I can't speak for anyone else, but I am not whining about money at all, and I think it's fair to bring that aspect up since he brought it up and had the presentation on the screen with him. I simply pointed out that the way he approached this did lead many to feel that there was a monetary aspect to the announcement itself. No one said research is free or that he shouldn't be allowed to sell whatever he wants, but the way this was presented was why so many complained about money. To be fair, reality in our society is that you can't post 23 implications over weeks of time that focus on not buying into manipulation and then present as he did in sections and emphasizing how cool that info you have to pay for really is, say that it is unambiguous and show primates on the screen as he talks about scientists, and then not expect some to question. Wasn't that what those implications said? Don't be lead and don't accept everything you are told. So why not question him the same way I would anyone else until I see proof?

I agree the video was for theatrics, but you can't present things theatrically and call them science unless you have more than two men on a screen. Sell it...that is fine, but if he didn't want people to get annoyed he might have presented things a bit differently from the beginning...as to the validity of the RV results? We can't prove anything conclusively and they aren't unbelievable to many, I think, but the annoyance came from the presentation and there is validity to it. To be clear, I have spoken with him before and was intrigued and enjoyed learning about what he is researching. I do not dislike him and have no desire to bash him. I think he is human and is like any of us...issues, needs, agendas, and faults. He is passionate about his research and seriously after mainstream recognition, and to him this is conclusive, I am sure. I wasn't thrilled with the idea of only one way is right and valid, but no one is perfect and he reminds me of many professors I have had who are focused on one thing done one way. It's the people skills and awareness part that I believe is clouding the reception, so as you said, the point in the long run is whether it changes who we think we are or how we will live our lives.

[Billy]

As the topic has moved into the pyramids, i would like to throw in this information that i mention in this thread. https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...s-A-revelation

. For humankind, Egypt, together with Sumer, remain fascinating examples of high
civilizations which suddenly appeared in the region around the middle of the fourth millennium BC It is speculation that such a body of knowledge that both Egypt and Sumer possessed was taught to them, rather than developed by them.

This chapter is full of astonishing, sometimes controversial information. Reading with care and patience would be beneficial - there is more than meets the eye in many of the sentences.

snip.

ANDREW: We have some questions about the Great Pyramid. Could you tell us who first built it?

Tom: It was in conjunction: Hoova, Ashan, Altea, and also the civilization of Myrex. It was four civilizations that raised it. When you ask who built it, you are speaking of the Twenty-Four civilizations.

ANDREW: Does that mean that humans did not have any part in the building?

Tom: They had a great part in the building. The engineering, the programming was done by the four civilizations. The attempting to transfer and transmit the knowledge came from the civilizations. Stonehenge also came from the civilizations. Yes.

: The Great Pyramid, and there were others that were of similar nature, was begun in a time before the destruction of Altea. It was begun approximately 150 years before the destruction of Altea, 13,000 of your years ago, in the colony in which it had been begun. Then, approximately 7,000 years ago additions were made and then it was completed. : It was originally designed to be a triangle. It was not completed though for a great length of time. It took - from the beginning until completion, because of destruction and changes - 6,000
years.

Andrew - Yes, thank you. And could you tell us, in whatever way you wish, what the purpose was for building the pyramid, and what is its inner secret that people are so concerned about?

Tom: Partly, it is regeneration of cells. It channels the energy from the civilizations. The Great Pyramid, and other pyramids, spiral an energy upward. But also the civilizations bring energy into Planet Earth through the pyramids. In the chambers of the pyramids, there are areas which are, what you would call rejuvenation chambers: they do preservation of cells. There is more to them, but of this we cannot speak at this time.

JOHN: Yes. The other two pyramids beside the Great Pyramid, they are from much later? From what date are they?

Tom: They came approximately 1500 to 2000 years after the completion.

End quotes from the only planet of choice book. http://ia600409.us.archive.org/16/it...net_choice.pdf

This information has been around since the 1970s.

Peace

[Synchronicity]

Posted by Shezbeth (here)
Imagine a future in which humanity has advanced and evolved, to the point that humanity no longer suppressed the evolution of other life forms on earth. Imagine the cow started to evolve,....

Snap back to the 'now'. It would be a very long process transitioning from the point of 'Humans use cattle for livestock and food' to the point of 'Humans acknowledge and accept the sovereignty of cows and allow them to live freely and unobstructed'.

I suggest that these forms are not dissimilar to the forms that humanity is at now, except humans are the cattle that are trending toward sovereignty, and the aliens are the humans.

Specifically, if the cows started to evolve I can all but guarantee that humanity would first respond by crafting some sort of device or system to perpetuate the servitude/expendability of the cows. Perhaps the humans would tell the cows that the humans are gods, and convince the cows to exert the brunt of the effort to erect massive megalithic devices that would fascinate and beguile the cows.

Intriguing ideas...I would imagine to keep the cows under control those things would be logical. And it isn't instant for sure. Food for thought...fear of not staying inside the fences whether they are electrified or not will keep the animal in forever unless it learns it can leave and takes the steps past the perimeter it is conditioned to stay in.

[Harley]

Courtney Brown
12:49 PM

I have decided to wait some days before posting the next part of the announcement to give some time for the dust to settle. We always knew this "noise" would happen when we released the project. It is interesting to note that seemingly 99% of the negative comments are related to the fact that part of the announcement involves a video that costs some money, and those people apparently think poorly of us because of this. Unfortunately, it is not possible for us to give everything we do away for free. I do not know of another organization that gives more of what it does away for free than The Farsight Institute, including all of our instructional materials. But for the record, for those who are interested, all of us at The Farsight Institute are volunteers; there are no salaried people. Moreover, the parent corporation that sells the videos (Farsight, Inc., which is different from the nonprofit, The Farsight Institute) gives all of its revenue (which is not much) to pay for bills that support the mission of The Farsight Institute. Farsight, Inc. has far less than $1,000 in its bank account, and there are bills associated with producing the video that people are complaining about that total much more than that. I personally have given over $100,000 to the Institute over the years, and I have never taken anything from any of my remote-viewing activities or research. And about the new video itself, we are only using the normal distribution outlets that are available to us. This is the planet we live on. I wish we could give everything away that we do, but doing so would only mean that we would cease to exist.

One last point, I had to disable comments on the YouTube video announcement released earlier today. It was taking too much of my time to search for and delete profanity. You are free to argue on this Facebook page. But please keep the profanity out of it. Thanks.

[Harley]

And since I can't 'Thank' my own post I'll do so here, because I do understand and agree with Courtney's comments.

[Billy]

Courtney Brown
12:49 PM

I have decided to wait some days before posting the next part of the announcement to give some time for the dust to settle.

Sorry but i have not seen any unsettled dust as yet.

We always knew this "noise" would happen when we released the project.

Courtney my friend, If you always knew then why change your plans last minute.

[superconsciousness]

Courtney seems to be doing what he can...we'll take him at his word as far as funds go, though a disproportionate amount of face time in front of the camera doesn't do anyone any good and hinders the cause. Why place one's self in front of the camera at all?...unnecessary in many respects. Overall, let's hope that this initiative is a step forward since the RV results seem to be consistent with what our network is aware of - likely accurate findings, where the original ETs who built the pyramids were into slave mentality, while the second group 'reprogrammed' the Great Pyramid to facilitate ascension. This second intervention has allowed someone in recent years to reverse engineer the technology for peaceful purposes after the inventor completed the ascension process in one of the main chambers of the Great Pyramid (no, not us). Perhaps one day you will know who that inventor is, perhaps not...it matters not, so long as the technology continues to be used to expedite the arrival of Superconsciousness, after which time it will no longer be needed.

[Shezbeth]

Agreed, and it would likely take a very long time for sufficiently 'insubordinate' cows to come along and be willing to challenge the fences, and the ideas.

Humanity as a collective has NOT yet trended entirely toward sovereignty. There have been breakthroughs and advances but we're not there yet, and the mind-control games are very active and ongoing.

Basically, I am saying that we (humans) are not finished being cattle; Perhaps not cattle as we see them, but that's a very low-evolutionary point. If the cattle were to evolve, I imagine they would increasingly look (not physiologically but sociologically) like humans DO. As the cattle (humanity) became more aware, it would be increasingly difficult to slaughter them and eat them, so other manners of predation would become the norm. Since the cows are so adverse to being eaten, what if humanity were to start consuming the aspects which they are NOT adverse to. A hypothetical dialogue:
---

As biological entities they produce a wealth of energy that they are oblivious to
and actively wasting,... why not consume that?

Brilliant! But, certain energy types seem more conducive to refinement/extraction/utilization, while others are quite obtrusive.

Well, why don't we direct their energy production into avenues we can use effectively? Fear is easy to generate on a massive scale, and is resource conservative,... how about we make 'em all afraid?

Okay, but fear also directly obstructs their potential to evolve. We don't want to be a parasite to them, more of a symbiont. How about this: We engage in a practice which keeps the overall level of fear toward a optimal threshold. This threshold will produce the maximum workable amount of energy, keeping them operating within acceptable (but not excessive) parameters, from which exceptional cows will still have the potential to make advances and thereby have the potential to effect the overall cow experience, but otherwise allowing us to operate at our most efficient levels until such a time as the cows are able to advance themselves beyond the structures we have constructed for them.

Simply put, let's keep the cows in the barn. When they are ready, they can kick the door open. When they do, we will transition to another form of resource consumption that is conducive to us, and agreeably NOT UNconducive to the cows. Similar to the energy management, but to a new dimension. Just because the cows will become sovereign doesn't mean they become omniscient, and no matter the level of development, there will always be avenues of resource management/extraction of which they are nescient and oblivious. Those are the areas in which we will set our sights, and when those areas become known we will continue to transition. The cows may think they're 'catching up' to us, but that's because we were running this track alot longer than they, and we are many laps further ahead than the cows are aware of. Just because they seem to be running alongside doesn't mean that we're 'even'. ^_~

---

In particular I am reminded of how when I was a kid, I used to play video games with my older brother. Being a few years older with a slightly better understanding of the controller, the games in question, motor skills, and understanding of the overall scheme, he regularly, repeatably, and soundly wiped the floor with me on every contest.

See, he was fixated on winning the contest, whereas I was fixated on enjoying and authentically experiencing it. It took me a long while to learn to win the contest, and by then it wasn't fun for either of us (I.E. neither got any energy, resource, gratification, etc.).

I can't imagine how, but somehow I imagine that last is particularly significant.

I get it now!

The mind control will continue to be attempted until it is no longer resource-effective to do so. At such a point that there is a net loss accrued in the resource management, THEN we will be recognized as equal participants.

That is also the point where we will need to evolve our predatory/symbiont dynamic with the cows though,....

As above so below! As Alien, so human! As Human, so cow!

[Synchronicity]

Well, calling the reaction noise is part of that disconnect I was talking about earlier. It isn't "noise". It's reaction to the whole situation, and holding off saying more doesn't help in my view. I would like to see all he has to show and then I can decide what I think. I don't mind having a video option to buy if I want more back story or whatever. It was the disconnect between a message of hope and information and the presentation that bothered me. If it had been donation-based it would be nice, but if he couldn't do that I understand. I get the need for money...really I do. Saying, "Here is all the information, and if you would like to see how we did it we have a video available. The cost covers the costs involved making it, but we thought you might like to see how it's done and give you that option" after a straightforward presentation of fact is fine. I think many would be fine with that.

I was hoping for the rest of the evidence, information, or whatever. Oh well. I'm not waiting with bated breath for who knows how long for another tidbit. To each his own, I guess. If something comes I will read it, but getting what was presented and nothing more for however long is disappointing. I really would like to see the whole presentation to judge more accurately, but then, he doesn't owe that and it is his choice.

Anyway, I think holding off more if there really is more to show is a mistake since some will leave without the whole picture and be fed up. Off to enjoy the day and get some work done

[Synchronicity]

Posted by Shezbeth (here)
Agreed, and it would likely take a very long time for sufficiently 'insubordinate' cows to come along and be willing to challenge the fences, and the ideas.

Humanity as a collective has NOT yet trended entirely toward sovereignty. There have been breakthroughs and advances but we're not there yet, and the mind-control games are very active and ongoing.

Basically, I am saying that we (humans) are not finished being cattle; Perhaps not cattle as we see them, but that's a very low-evolutionary point. If the cattle were to evolve, I imagine they would increasingly look (not physiologically but sociologically) like humans DO. As the cattle (humanity) became more aware, it would be increasingly difficult to slaughter them and eat them, so other manners of predation would become the norm. Since the cows are so adverse to being eaten, what if humanity were to start consuming the aspects which they are NOT adverse to. A hypothetical dialogue:
---

As biological entities they produce a wealth of energy that they are oblivious to
and actively wasting,... why not consume that?

Brilliant! But, certain energy types seem more conducive to refinement/extraction/utilization, while others are quite obtrusive.

Well, why don't we direct their energy production into avenues we can use effectively? Fear is easy to generate on a massive scale, and is resource conservative,... how about we make 'em all afraid?

Okay, but fear also directly obstructs their potential to evolve. We don't want to be a parasite to them, more of a symbiont. How about this: We engage in a practice which keeps the overall level of fear toward a optimal threshold. This threshold will produce the maximum workable amount of energy, keeping them operating within acceptable (but not excessive) parameters, from which exceptional cows will still have the potential to make advances and thereby have the potential to effect the overall cow experience, but otherwise allowing us to operate at our most efficient levels until such a time as the cows are able to advance themselves beyond the structures we have constructed for them.

Simply put, let's keep the cows in the barn. When they are ready, they can kick the door open. When they do, we will transition to another form of resource consumption that is conducive to us, and agreeably NOT UNconducive to the cows. Similar to the energy management, but to a new dimension. Just because the cows will become sovereign doesn't mean they become omniscient, and no matter the level of development, there will always be avenues of resource management/extraction of which they are nescient and oblivious. Those are the areas in which we will set our sights, and when those areas become known we will continue to transition. The cows may think they're 'catching up' to us, but that's because we were running this track alot longer than they, and we are many laps further ahead than the cows are aware of. Just because they seem to be running alongside doesn't mean that we're 'even'. ^_~

---

In particular I am reminded of how when I was a kid, I used to play video games with my older brother. Being a few years older with a slightly better understanding of the controller, the games in question, motor skills, and understanding of the overall scheme, he regularly, repeatably, and soundly wiped the floor with me on every contest.

See, he was fixated on winning the contest, whereas I was fixated on enjoying and authentically experiencing it. It took me a long while to learn to win the contest, and by then it wasn't fun for either of us (I.E. neither got any energy, resource, gratification, etc.).

I can't imagine how, but somehow I imagine that last is particularly significant.

I get it now!

The mind control will continue to be attempted until it is no longer resource-effective to do so. At such a point that there is a net loss accrued in the resource management, THEN we will be recognized as equal participants.

That is also the point where we will need to evolve our predatory/symbiont dynamic with the cows though,....

As above so below! As Alien, so human! As Human, so cow!

Lol...I really enjoyed reading that scenario. More food for thought

[Snowflower]

Nah, I'm done. Courtney made claims that are not true. Remote Viewing is not 100% proof. The theory (not fact) about alien involvement in pyramid construction is not new information. Today will not be the day marked as the change in direction of humanity. Mr. Brown is permanently in my "irrelevant" list

[Hervé]

For some reason I suspect that, among the "noise" monitored (>90,000 viewers on Avalon alone), there are a few he didn't expect and didn't have a ready answer for... hence time needed to counter those... there! My $0,02 in the pot!

[sdv]

Posted by Synchronicity (here)

Yes, I did read the evidence on the site, actually, and some others may have as well.

And no, I have no problem with someone making a living by any means. I can't speak for anyone else, but I am not whining about money at all, and I think it's fair to bring that aspect up since he brought it up and had the presentation on the screen with him. I simply pointed out that the way he approached this did lead many to feel that there was a monetary aspect to the announcement itself. No one said research is free or that he shouldn't be allowed to sell whatever he wants, but the way this was presented was why so many complained about money. To be fair, reality in our society is that you can't post 23 implications over weeks of time that focus on not buying into manipulation and then present as he did in sections and emphasizing how cool that info you have to pay for really is, say that it is unambiguous and show primates on the screen as he talks about scientists, and then not expect some to question. Wasn't that what those implications said? Don't be lead and don't accept everything you are told. So why not question him the same way I would anyone else until I see proof?

I agree the video was for theatrics, but you can't present things theatrically and call them science unless you have more than two men on a screen. Sell it...that is fine, but if he didn't want people to get annoyed he might have presented things a bit differently from the beginning...as to the validity of the RV results? We can't prove anything conclusively and they aren't unbelievable to many, I think, but the annoyance came from the presentation and there is validity to it. To be clear, I have spoken with him before and was intrigued and enjoyed learning about what he is researching. I do not dislike him and have no desire to bash him. I think he is human and is like any of us...issues, needs, agendas, and faults. He is passionate about his research and seriously after mainstream recognition, and to him this is conclusive, I am sure. I wasn't thrilled with the idea of only one way is right and valid, but no one is perfect and he reminds me of many professors I have had who are focused on one thing done one way. It's the people skills and awareness part that I believe is clouding the reception, so as you said, the point in the long run is whether it changes who we think we are or how we will live our lives.

Agree. I, just my personal perception, do not think he has contributed anything significant to an understanding of the building of and purpose of the pyramids. At best, I hope that someone will find some new nugget of information in his research that will enable a full joining of dots in more comprehensive research.

If Courtney Brown can use RV to explain what happened to the missing Malaysian flight, I will be impressed (he has said he can accurately RV past but not future)!

[sdv]

Posted by Shezbeth (here)
Agreed, and it would likely take a very long time for sufficiently 'insubordinate' cows to come along and be willing to challenge the fences, and the ideas.

Humanity as a collective has NOT yet trended entirely toward sovereignty. There have been breakthroughs and advances but we're not there yet, and the mind-control games are very active and ongoing.

Basically, I am saying that we (humans) are not finished being cattle; Perhaps not cattle as we see them, but that's a very low-evolutionary point. If the cattle were to evolve, I imagine they would increasingly look (not physiologically but sociologically) like humans DO. As the cattle (humanity) became more aware, it would be increasingly difficult to slaughter them and eat them, so other manners of predation would become the norm. Since the cows are so adverse to being eaten, what if humanity were to start consuming the aspects which they are NOT adverse to. A hypothetical dialogue:
---

As biological entities they produce a wealth of energy that they are oblivious to
and actively wasting,... why not consume that?

Brilliant! But, certain energy types seem more conducive to refinement/extraction/utilization, while others are quite obtrusive.

Well, why don't we direct their energy production into avenues we can use effectively? Fear is easy to generate on a massive scale, and is resource conservative,... how about we make 'em all afraid?

Okay, but fear also directly obstructs their potential to evolve. We don't want to be a parasite to them, more of a symbiont. How about this: We engage in a practice which keeps the overall level of fear toward a optimal threshold. This threshold will produce the maximum workable amount of energy, keeping them operating within acceptable (but not excessive) parameters, from which exceptional cows will still have the potential to make advances and thereby have the potential to effect the overall cow experience, but otherwise allowing us to operate at our most efficient levels until such a time as the cows are able to advance themselves beyond the structures we have constructed for them.

Simply put, let's keep the cows in the barn. When they are ready, they can kick the door open. When they do, we will transition to another form of resource consumption that is conducive to us, and agreeably NOT UNconducive to the cows. Similar to the energy management, but to a new dimension. Just because the cows will become sovereign doesn't mean they become omniscient, and no matter the level of development, there will always be avenues of resource management/extraction of which they are nescient and oblivious. Those are the areas in which we will set our sights, and when those areas become known we will continue to transition. The cows may think they're 'catching up' to us, but that's because we were running this track alot longer than they, and we are many laps further ahead than the cows are aware of. Just because they seem to be running alongside doesn't mean that we're 'even'. ^_~

---

In particular I am reminded of how when I was a kid, I used to play video games with my older brother. Being a few years older with a slightly better understanding of the controller, the games in question, motor skills, and understanding of the overall scheme, he regularly, repeatably, and soundly wiped the floor with me on every contest.

See, he was fixated on winning the contest, whereas I was fixated on enjoying and authentically experiencing it. It took me a long while to learn to win the contest, and by then it wasn't fun for either of us (I.E. neither got any energy, resource, gratification, etc.).

I can't imagine how, but somehow I imagine that last is particularly significant.

I get it now!

The mind control will continue to be attempted until it is no longer resource-effective to do so. At such a point that there is a net loss accrued in the resource management, THEN we will be recognized as equal participants.

That is also the point where we will need to evolve our predatory/symbiont dynamic with the cows though,....

As above so below! As Alien, so human! As Human, so cow!

Courtney Brown has just echoed what is already known at PA and given nothing ground-breaking to up the game for us. And I do not see anything in his announcement that will change the beliefs of anyone outside the PA forum.

However, I do have some optimism that someone will be galvanized to do the real work and connect all the dots and present the information in a way that will be compelling (i.e. learn how to win the game as you did with your brother).

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Posted by Synchronicity (here)
Well, calling the reaction noise is part of that disconnect I was talking about earlier. It isn't "noise". It's reaction to the whole situation, and holding off saying more doesn't help in my view. I would like to see all he has to show and then I can decide what I think. I don't mind having a video option to buy if I want more back story or whatever. It was the disconnect between a message of hope and information and the presentation that bothered me. If it had been donation-based it would be nice, but if he couldn't do that I understand. I get the need for money...really I do. Saying, "Here is all the information, and if you would like to see how we did it we have a video available. The cost covers the costs involved making it, but we thought you might like to see how it's done and give you that option" after a straightforward presentation of fact is fine. I think many would be fine with that.

I was hoping for the rest of the evidence, information, or whatever. Oh well. I'm not waiting with bated breath for who knows how long for another tidbit. To each his own, I guess. If something comes I will read it, but getting what was presented and nothing more for however long is disappointing. I really would like to see the whole presentation to judge more accurately, but then, he doesn't owe that and it is his choice.

Anyway, I think holding off more if there really is more to show is a mistake since some will leave without the whole picture and be fed up. Off to enjoy the day and get some work done

If you want to see all he has to show then check out his data ...http://www.farsight.org/demo/Mysteri..._7_ryuseg.html

[Arc]

Posted by Harley Hawkins (here)
And since I can't 'Thank' my own post I'll do so here, because I do understand and agree with Courtney's comments.

Thanks, Harley.

My thoughts regarding the idea of charging $$ for the video,

You have to realize that money is currently a reality we have to deal with - for better or worse - it's here. We should strive to evolve past using money to more service to others, whereby there is a society of full of abundance instead of (manufactured) lack to control people. Ultimately though, money is a representation of something valid. There is an "energy exchange" happening between beings.

Like, I give my energy to grow food, and in return you give me your energy to build a house for me (that's over simplified of course, to make a point). You mow my lawn, and I bake you a pie. Even without money, the energy exchange is real and must occur, and should be beneficial to both parties. The same idea is expanded from the individual to the society - in recipricol. The society provides numerous resources, transportation, food, entertainment, shelter, for which the individual should find a useful niche to contribute to in order to receive back.

The part where we went wrong here on Earth, is that the money system was hijacked by a parasite class who are siphoning our energy out of the system, via debt interest, and government taxation. This parasite class has ruined the energy exchange between all the rest of us. This causes people to horde and become greedy and only think of survival. All of these contribute to control. But, money itself is only another tool. It represents the exchange value of our labor and services.

Energy exchange in the current form we use it, as money, is a system we still have. In order for living, we still heavily depend on this form of exchange to keep our shelters, feed our selves, and have a means to exchange with others. Therefor, I am saying it's ok for CB to charge $15 for his final presentation of his research. Look, he spend at least a year of his time and energy, as well as the other contributors, to conduct this study and share it with us. If we want to share it, it's completely reasonable for him to ask for a nominal fee to support the work, the institute, the concept/science of RV, and yes even entertain those of us truth seekers.

The distinction we should make on energy (money) exchange is this:

Is this something I support? Is it a fair exchange?
or
Is this not beneficial to me in a way? I don't think the exchange is fair, or is exploitative.

If you want the information and video he provided, but you feel angry or cheated that he is charging, maybe you should look in the mirror and see if there is any greed in your own heart, to want his energy contribution, without giving back your own.

[Arc]

Posted by Snowflower (here)
Nah, I'm done. Courtney made claims that are not true. Remote Viewing is not 100% proof. The theory (not fact) about alien involvement in pyramid construction is not new information. Today will not be the day marked as the change in direction of humanity. Mr. Brown is permanently in my "irrelevant" list

Isn't that a little drastic of a reaction though? speaking in absolutes about the material and techniques? Did you watch the whole video?

[aviators]

Initially was disappointed with Courtneys first presentation.
Its just that I was hoping/expecting for a grand slam instead we have
a player on first with no outs. Now we have to pay for the rest of the game.



I am a little disappointing in myself for getting caught up in all the foreplay.
That being said perhaps more people will bring RV to the table.


Surely it is possible some of our great thinkers/inventors were psychic
and used RV of some fashion. Nikola Tesla comes to mind.

Sorry if I missed it. But what was the 2 week delay because of
some instability ?

2nd Has Simon Parks ever chimed in on the Mantis Pyramid connection?