Google Taken Over By Desperate Cabal - Fake Propaganda Headline - backdated site - No Article!

[sigma6]

50,000 rally in Moscow against Russian 'Occupation' - Corporate Level Internet Propaganda?

BREAKING NEWS ALRIGHT... and the NEWS is GOOGLE is being used for major propaganda campaigns by a coordinated effort of major MSM sites...

I just had to post this... I see this link, and go to it, at the french news site (AFP, I think) When I get there there is no article, just the headline????

I see a 125x125 link ad on "breaking news" on this page (major MSM Site) dated Mar.18 2014,
http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandst...g-generation-y

see image near bottom... it is making reference to "Breaking News" I click it and got to this page. Note the first page is the Guardian (Big MSM site) and it goes to another big French MSM site and voila - NO article!...

http://www.france24.com/en/breaking/..._date=inconnue

Yet this article is supposed to be dated Mar. 15th, 2014, (not sure why that would be breaking news... none-the-less, no article, no pictures... I smell a huge internet marketing propaganda campaign in the works, when have we seen backdated sites on the web before (Sandyhook?)

Then I Google search it, and see the headline come, up, but as I go to each individual site and check out the articles. I see vague articles, some not even related, and no specifically related pictures? And in some I can't even see the headline!? Like this one from the wire...
http://www.thewire.com/global/2014/0...kraine/359210/
But the headline reads:
As Crimea Votes to Join Russia, Ukrainian and Russian Troops Head Toward Border and shows a lame picture of ordinary people voting...

Notice what they did, they put the "50,000 people" phrase into the perma-link, this shows sophistication, not sure why, but it makes for a great confounding of the Google Search results... i.e. they didn't have time to change the content? Keep tabs on this link... If the content changes, then what we are witnessing is a TOP DOWN, BLATANT, IN YOUR FACE, PROPAGANDA CAMPAIGN, where they are literally targeting sites, that show peaceful voting (for example, something they must truly abhor) and could end up changing the content to match the perma-link header.... This might be something one might do if they were given the task to co-ordinate huge changes across many networks (and of course we know they are ALL more or less controlled by the same people at the highest levels...


Google IS Being taken over by Big Brother... Why else would YouTube allow an agency of SUPER FLAGGERS. Knowing full well it will kill their reputation? This wreaks of the Cabal DESPERATION that Benjamin Fulford has clearly described. If this is going on... (and as Bush would say... "and it clearly is...") I can't wait for the backlash on this one.

Anyhow the last 4 or 5 I checked I see this disconnect between the headline and the site article and in NONE do I see any pictures related to this news article either....???

I know internet marketing tools are getting very sophisticated these days as marketers continue to innovate, but it looks like the large corporations are hiring these guys and using their strategies to create illegal, totally phony super propaganda campaigns.

That great, and let me guess these are the same guys that Google just gave Super Flagger status to????

Note all the sites that come up are big name corporation sites... BBC, TIME, France24, The Wire, Yahoo. i.e. NOTHING ALTERNATIVE... Zero. And I suspect if there is any, they will be buying out traitors...

This is someone's sophisticated social engineering experiment... Take note. This is so incredibly dangerous in my mind the implications of this...

[Sophocles]

Here is the "50,000 rally in Moscow against Russian 'occupation' of Crimea" -article: http://www.france24.com/en/20140315-...pation-crimea/

[sigma6]

My point is I am showing in the links above and interestingly there is another 125x125 ad link making reference to the same article on that very page.

These are actually 125x 125 image files that are usually used as advert slots, but this is the new thing in advertising, making adverts look like news flashes. But now they are using advert images to reference news articles! No harm in that necessarily but someone has to be posting these... and the link I have above and the same link on your same page which is supposed to reference the same article shows the page with no article...

i.e. someone is being sloppy or in a hurry, it takes time and effort and money to post those tiny little "ads" and they don't even go to an article... And the other link by the wire, creating a perma link that references the article in the text of the perma link, which is processed by google search engines, but clearly doesn't match the content, (I copied/pasted the header at the site for future reference/monitoring...)

And the picture in your link hardly looks like 50,000 people to me either... To me it is just showing that things are getting more deceptive and convoluted... this just so reminds me of black hat internet marketing strategies that are always going in and out of vogue...

But what happens when major corporations who have TAKEN CONTROL of others content with "permission" from "GoogToob" start doing these egregious affronts as a matter of routine. Let's face it, giving less then 1% of the population God like control over what other's post is the end of alternative news on the internet (for most people dependent on Google.)

Look what happened to Mark Dice, 60,000,000 million hits and 7 years work flushed down the toilet (hope he backed up his work... BECAUSE THAT IS THE ONLY INSURANCE)

But this doesn't even address the potential output of trash propaganda that a consortium of corporations could output... Maybe they have seen what Karen Hudes has done so effectively done, and realize that people really are waking up, really are tuning out (of TV)... can you smell the desperation they must be feeling at losing absolute control over ALL MEDIA... ? Corporate MSM is a dinosaur, but it looks like they are now setting their sights on the INTERNET itself, and what better way then to infiltrate and TAKE OVER GOOGLE ???

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

GOOGLE IS A MONOPOLY, But we put our faith in them operating as a source of free expression of information. But would that apply in a war? The US is a military dictatorship. Unlike the Microsoft DOJ Anti Trust fiasco... (that disappeared after Microsoft gave them exclusive back door access to Vista... Yep!) "They" must have perfected their system of "take overs" regarding high tech computer related corporations... Notice Google has never been flagged for Monopoly issues, because they have bent over and given that control away already... It's OFFICIAL now as far as I am concerned...

Whoever controls GOOGLE has total control over the a HUGE amount of traffic on the internet... and by buying YouTube.... It's a near 100% monopoly, now we are seeing special interest Groups giving themselves "Super flagging abilities..."???

And when I see half done posts, complete with advert links that redirect to "unfinished pages" that were supposed to be done 10 days ago????

[grannyfranny100]

Sigma6- fascinating to hear the insight you achieve from your internet awareness. What a wonderful way to evaluate what is going on.-Thank you.

[Lifebringer]

Using old headlines like Fox Noise uses old TP rally footage. They really are gonna try this incompetent attempt to throw out propaganda as provable as this? WOW! Doonkoffs to the nteenthpower, no wonder they are going down.

Who doesn't know nsarulesgoogles? C'mon peeps, we've been at this too long to not realize FB, Twitter, Google, AT&T, Comcast and all the other joe knuckleheadstations out there or just eager to know how far we've come, or whether we've come on psychicly yet. They are full of earthquakes in their pants right about now.
Hahahaha, I love it when a plan comes together for the A-Team of Truth.

[bodhii71]

I've been saying that this was coming, no surprise here. What are we to do? Maybe crowd source your own internet service, for the people, by the people. 2

[Joe Akulis]

Here's kinda the way I see things:

We're slowly coming to the realization that life on planet Earth is a "co-created" experience. To me, that means we all have a say in what happens globally. I think the reason the bosses were able to pull off WW1 and WW2 was because there weren't many outlets for people to keep track of world events, other than the newspapers and in some places, the movie theaters. Here in America, the Warner Brothers did a great job of whipping up patriotic fervor at a time when most of us were involved in the conflicts in europe mentally, and physically.

Large scale wars were possible because everyone had consciously gotten involved and taken sides.

Nowadays, it's kind of interesting when I ask people around me about what they think about what's happening in the Ukraine. They don't really care. It's not something that's in the forefront of everyone's minds, because not many people are glued to CNN. And thankfully, some of us even see through the falseness of the news outlets here in America. This constant warmongering is not front and center to those of us who aren't directly affected by what's going on.

I think this difference between what is and isn't in the foreground of everyone's thoughts from day to day is why we see such a desperate effort put forth to try to insist that these conflicts are the things we should be devoting our awareness to, and forming emotional opinions on. Because if they don't have that mass conscious support, then the reality here is co-created in ways that diverge from the goals of those "powers that be".