Boeing MH370 disappears in flight with 239 passengers

[sigma6]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
------
Of minor interest, but interesting nonetheless: the cost of the search operation.
http://cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/...earch.cnn.html
Costs are currently running at a rate of $21 million per month (mostly from various countries' military training budgets). Previous extensive search-and-recovery operations have topped out at as much as $50 million, but this might well end up dwarfing that.

There's a strategic motive right there... fly a plane off... how much is one of those worth, then it puts a huge drain on your enemies insurance policies, then another 21,000,000 a month, on top of the Rothchilds eliminating 4 patent holders. The price on that is probably in the mega billions over the next 10, 20 years... it all adds up perfectly... who can deny the financial motive?

¤=[Post Update]=¤

This is gang warfare, pure and simple... (lol, excuse the irony...)
There is just way, way, way too many "coincidences" on this one, and way, way too much money involved, this is a step up from the crashing of the Korean flight, the pattern keeps becoming clearer...

ROTHSHILD INHERITS PATENT AFTER 4 CO-OWNERS "DISAPPEAR" ON MH 370 FLIGHT
http://engineeringevil.com/2014/03/2...mh-370-flight/

Hmmm? • Tags: Carlyle Group, Freescale Semiconductor, Integrated circuit, Jacob Rothschild 4th Baron Rothschild, Kuala-Lumpur, Malaysia Airlines, Patent, Saudi Binladin Group
EEV: Currently single source info., which needs additional confirmation. ( deserves to be noted, even though odd )

Friday, 28 March 2014




The disappearance of four members of a patent semiconductor traveling on Malaysia Airlines MH370 makes the famous billionaire Jacob Rothschild the sole owner of a very important patent.

The mystery surrounding the Malaysian Airlines MH-370 is growing as each day passes with more mysterious silence shadowing the disappearance of the airline. More and more theories are beginning to emerge. We have heard of black holes swallowing the airliner (likely the least intelligent thing ever said on TV), deranged pilots taking it over… But no media outlet has mentioned anything about who was on that plane. Absolutely nothing! Well, for starters, the people who owned the patent to Freescale Semiconductor’s ARM microcontroller ‘KL-03′ which is a new improvised version of an older microcontroller KL-02 were on the MH-370 flight. This report has caught legs across dozens of European based news outlets. Did Rothschild exploited the airlines to gain full Patent Rights of an incredible KL-03 micro-chip? According to the reports, Jacob Rothschild is dubbed as the “evil master plotter”.

A US technology company which had 20 senior staff on board Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 had just launched a new electronic warfare gadget for military radar systems in the days before the Boeing 777 went missing.

Freescale Semiconductor has been developing microprocessors, sensors and other technology for the past 50 years. The technology it creates is commonly referred to as embedded processors, which according to the firm are “stand-alone semiconductors that perform dedicated computing functions in electronic systems”.


Why were so many Freescale employees traveling together? What were their jobs. Were they on a mission and if so what was this mission? Can these employees be the cause of the disappearance of this plane? Could the plane have been then hijacked and these people kidnapped? Did these employees hold valuable information, did they have any valuable cargo with them? Did they know company and technological secrets? With all the might of technology why cant this plane be located? Where is this plane where are these people?”

The 20 Freescale employees, among 239 people on flight MH370, were mostly engineers and other experts working to make the company’s chip facilities in Tianjin, China, and Kuala Lumpur more efficient, said Mitch Haws, vice president, global communications and investor relations.

“These were people with a lot of experience and technical background and they were very important people,” Haws said. “It’s definitely a loss for the company.”


In Malaysia, Freescale’s modern operations facility that manufactures and tests integrated circuits (IC) is based in Petaling Jaya.

Based on information obtained from Freescale’s website, the facility began operations in 1972 covering an eight hectare site and is specifically designed for the manufacturing and testing of microprocessors, digital signal processors and integrated radio frequency circuits.

It also owns Freescale RF which is involved in creating solutions for Aerospace and Defence listed below.

1. Battlefield communication
2. Avionics
3. HF Radar – Band L- and S-
4. Missile Guidance
5. Electronic Warfare
6. Identification, friend or foe (IFF)

Freescale’s shareholders include the Carlyle Group of private equity investors whose past advisers have included ex-US president George Bush Sr and former British Prime Minister John Major.
Carlyle’s previous heavyweight clients include the Saudi Binladin Group, the construction firm owned by the family of Osama bin Laden.

The fact that Freescale had so many highly qualified staff on board the Boeing 777 had already prompted wild conspiracy theories about what might have happened.

The company says they were flying to China to improve its consumer products operations, but Freescale’s fresh links to electronic warfare technology is likely to trigger more speculation and deepen the mystery.

Experts have been baffled how a large passenger jet seems to have flown undetected and possibly beaten military radar systems for up to six hours even though today’s satellites can take a crystal clear picture of someone crossing a street. // Read Entire Report Here .

[ktlight]

Leuren Moret with Alfred Webre: US shot down MH370 over Singapore airspace

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=uuWyLgIv1kg

"Published on Apr 9, 2014
READ ARTICLE WITH DOCUMENTS & PHOTOS
Part 1 - Leuren Moret: Confirmed -- MH370 shot down by US over Singapore airspace as UK Inmarsat leads 30 day false flag psyops for 5 NWO objectives [READ FULL ARTICLE]
http://exopolitics.blogs.com/peaceins..."

[Roisin]

As for those people out there who are giving us various theories that Flight 370 crashed and/or exploded somewhere, they are conveniently leaving out the following information of well documented credible data by a renowned and respected non-gov't affiliated and independent agency composed of the world's most top scientists that their "Sensitive nuclear monitoring equipment has found no evidence that Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 exploded or crashed...." (on land or water).

Those Flight 370 Crash/Explosion Theorists are leaving out that important information because to include it, would negate their theory... of course.

Posted by Roisin (here)
U.N. Says It Detected No Crash or Explosion


Source: http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/mis...plosion-n55256


"Sensitive nuclear monitoring equipment has found no evidence that Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 exploded or crashed, the U.N. said Monday.

While seismic systems used by the Vienna-based Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty Organization are intended to detect nuclear explosions, they're also capable of picking up "the explosion of a larger aircraft, as well as its impact on the ground or on water," Stephane Dujarric, Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon's spokesman, told reporters in New York.

But tests over the weekend had confirmed that "neither an explosion nor a plane crash on land or on water had been detected so far," Dujarric said Monday.

The organization's executive secretary ordered that all its sensors be used to try to find the plane, and he encouraged scientists from around the world to "carefully study the available data," Dujarric said."

Posted by Roisin (here)
Malaysian Airlines Flight MH370: UN N-watchdog says no explosion or crash detected

Tags: Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization, CTBTO, Malaysia Airlines flight MH370, Malaysian Airlines Flight, MH370

United Nations, Mar 18: A UN-backed nuclear watchdog has said that it did not detect either any explosion or crash that could be linked to the missing Malaysia Airlines plane, amid continued speculation over fate of the aircraft.

“Regarding the missing Malaysian Airlines flight… the Vienna-based Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO) confirmed that neither an explosion nor a plane crash on land or on water had been detected so far,” Spokesman for UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon Stephane Dujarric told reporters here yesterday.

Dujarric said plane accidents may be detected, depending on individual circumstances, by three of the four technologies used by the CTBTO’s International Monitoring System (IMS). While the verification system has been put in place to detect nuclear explosions, it is also able to detect the explosion of a larger aircraft, as well as its impact on the ground or on water.

CTBTO Executive Secretary Lassina Zerbo had last week said that he would put the sensors of the organization at work to see if a possible explosion at high altitude of the missing Malaysian Airlines plane could be detected.

Zerbo has also encouraged all scientists from UN member states to carefully study the available data. He had said the CTBTO uses “infrasound” – or infrasonic sensors – to monitor the earth mainly for atmospheric nuclear explosions.

Dujarric said the CTBTO has a network, as part of their Test-Ban-Treaty, of extremely sensitive sensors throughout the world that detect nuclear explosions and earthquakes.

The flight MH370 carrying 239 people has been missing since March 8 and a multi-national search has so far shed little light on where the plane could have landed or crashed.

Zerbo had asked the head of the CTBTO’s International Data Center (IDC) to look at the data to find any clues about the missing plane.

Zerbo said infrasound would be the best technology to check for an explosion on the missing plane if there was a monitoring station nearby, “or the explosion is at a level or at an amplitude that it could be detected.”

“There’s a possibility, it’s not absolute, that the technology like the Infrazone could be able to detect” an explosion, he had said.

The mystery of the missing plane from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing since March 8 continued to baffle aviation and security authorities who have not succeeded in tracking the aircraft despite deploying hi-tech radar and other gadgets.

CTBTO said infrasound is produced by a variety of natural and man-made sources like exploding volcanoes, earthquakes, meteors, storms and auroras in the natural world; nuclear, mining and large chemical explosions, as well as aircraft and rocket launches in the man-made arena.

Infrasound monitoring is one of the four technologies used by the International Monitoring System (IMS) to verify compliance with the nuclear test ban treaty. The IDC routinely detect signals from commercial planes taking-off and landing at airports located in the proximity of IMS infrasound stations. In the past, CTBTO stations have detected some plane accidents, including the crash of a plane at Narita airport in Japan in March 2009.

Modified Date: March 18, 2014 1:31 PM

http://www.india.com/loudspeaker/mal...etected-24478/

-------------------------------------

Flight MH370: UN N-watchdog says no explosion or crash detected

The verification system put in place to detect nuclear explosions is also able to detect the explosion of a larger aircraft as well as its impact on the ground or on water

United Nations, Mar 18 (PTI): A UN-backed nuclear watchdog has said that it did not detect either any explosion or crash that could be linked to the missing Malaysia Airlines plane, amid continued speculation over fate of the aircraft.

“Regarding the missing Malaysian Airlines flight… the Vienna-based Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO) confirmed that neither an explosion nor a plane crash on land or on water had been detected so far,” Spokesman for UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon Stephane Dujarric told reporters here yesterday.

Dujarric said plane accidents may be detected, depending on individual circumstances, by three of the four technologies used by the CTBTO’s International Monitoring System (IMS).

While the verification system has been put in place to detect nuclear explosions, it is also able to detect the explosion of a larger aircraft, as well as its impact on the ground or on water.

CTBTO Executive Secretary Lassina Zerbo had last week said that he would put the sensors of the organization at work to see if a possible explosion at high altitude of the missing Malaysian Airlines plane could be detected.

Zerbo has also encouraged all scientists from UN member states to carefully study the available data. He had said the CTBTO uses “infrasound” – or infrasonic sensors – to monitor the earth mainly for atmospheric nuclear explosions.

Dujarric said the CTBTO has a network, as part of their Test-Ban-Treaty, of extremely sensitive sensors throughout the world that detect nuclear explosions and earthquakes.

The flight MH370 carrying 239 people has been missing since March 8 and a multi-national search has so far shed little light on where the plane could have landed or crashed.

Zerbo had asked the head of the CTBTO’s International Data Center (IDC) to look at the data to find any clues about the missing plane.

Zerbo said infrasound would be the best technology to check for an explosion on the missing plane if there was a monitoring station nearby, “or the explosion is at a level or at an amplitude that it could be detected.”

“There’s a possibility, it’s not absolute, that the technology like the Infrazone could be able to detect” an explosion, he had said.

The mystery of the missing plane from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing since March 8 continued to baffle aviation and security authorities who have not succeeded in tracking the aircraft despite deploying hi-tech radar and other gadgets.

http://www.tehelka.com/flight-mh370-...rash-detected/

[Cidersomerset]

David posted this today , it has been posted before but worth a watch as its
his view on the bigger picture which he has been monitoring for years. TPTB
have been manipulating the US & Israel in particularly to start WW111 to
bring in a new world order.




Thursday 10th April 2014 at 07:17 By David Icke

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=1S4_J8MiYWE

Please circulate far and wide.

http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/

[araucaria]

Signs that black box data may not turn up after all:
Missing Flight MH370 Black Box Data May Have Been Lost Because Of 'Unrobust' Behaviour



http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014...?utm_hp_ref=uk

[Roisin]

Thus far, there have been no confirmations that any of those weak and very nebulous pulses are signals from Flight 370's black box.

Signals coming from remote location underscore difficulty of recovering flight wreckage

"While Houston was excited about the latest development, describing it as the "most promising lead" so far, he was equally cautious as there could be many other sounds moving through water – known as acoustic energy – which are greatly affected by temperature, pressure and salinity.

"And that has the effect of attenuating, bending – sometimes through 90 degrees – sound waves. So it is quite possible and very hard to predict – it's quite possible for sound to travel great distances laterally but be very difficult to hear near the surface of the ocean, for instance," Peter Leavy, who heads the military task force conducting the search, told CNN." – April 8, 2014.

http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/m...recovering-wre

Also.. the US navy ship they had in those waters to help locate "black box" pings stopped searching and pulled out of the search yesterday morning.

[panopticon]

Posted by Roisin (here)
Also.. the US navy ship they had in those waters to help locate "black box" pings stopped searching and pulled out of the search yesterday morning.

Just curious if anyone knows what US vessels are assisting in the search operation?

-- Pan

Oh, and here's the latest media release from the JACC.

###

Update on search for Malaysian flight MH370

Media Release
10 April 2014—pm

The Chief Coordinator of the Joint Agency Coordination Centre, Air Chief Marshal Angus Houston (Ret'd), has confirmed that whilst conducting an acoustic search this afternoon a RAAF AP-3C Orion aircraft has detected a possible signal in the vicinity of the Australian Defence Vessel Ocean Shield.

“The acoustic data will require further analysis overnight but shows potential of being from a man-made source,” Air Chief Marshal Houston (Ret'd) said.

“I will provide a further update if, and when, further information becomes available.”

Source

[Operator]

Posted by panopticon (here)
---
The Chief Coordinator of the Joint Agency Coordination Centre, Air Chief Marshal Angus Houston (Ret'd), has confirmed that whilst conducting an acoustic search this afternoon a RAAF AP-3C Orion aircraft has detected a possible signal in the vicinity of the Australian Defence Vessel Ocean Shield.
---

Orion P3's can drop off several buoys to faster determine an area of interest from a wider
range and direct other vessels toward it. I still makes no sense why they didn't do this
much sooner after the disappearance ...

[Hervé]

Posted by Roisin (here)
As for those people out there who are giving us various theories that Flight 370 crashed and/or exploded somewhere, they are conveniently leaving out the following information of well documented credible data by a renowned and respected non-gov't affiliated and independent agency composed of the world's most top scientists that their "Sensitive nuclear monitoring equipment has found no evidence that Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 exploded or crashed...." (on land or water).

Those Flight 370 Crash/Explosion Theorists are leaving out that important information because to include it, would negate their theory... of course.

[...]

Posted by Roisin (here)
[...]

Zerbo said infrasound would be the best technology to check for an explosion on the missing plane if there was a monitoring station nearby, “or the explosion is at a level or at an amplitude that it could be detected.”

“There’s a possibility, it’s not absolute, that the technology like the Infrazone could be able to detect” an explosion, he had said.

[...]
http://www.india.com/loudspeaker/mal...etected-24478/

[...]
http://www.tehelka.com/flight-mh370-...rash-detected/

The closest infrasound geo/hydro/micro-phones being at a distance of some 2000 Km, the only thing these infrasound recordings exclude is a BIG explosion/crash!

Posted by buares (here)
Notice the date and the long list of websites:

The 7 closest certified and operational IMS infrasound stations (green icons) are located over 2000km (I06AU, Cocos Island) from the last known position of the plane.

What say you ?

These data do not rule out nor exclude anything else!

Posted by Amzer Zo (here)
Now, back to the topic, the only realistic conclusion that can be drawn from the "seismographic" data analysis is that there was no high altitude free fall crash nor huge explosion fitting in that time window.

That doesn't exclude low altitude crash or belly landing or multiple small explosions, etc...

... nor a plane disintegrating in mid-air for whatever reason.

As for any credible witnesses, they should expect a visit from those guys in black:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=IyaFEBI_L24

[Roisin]

Amzer Zo,

Please view that article that NBC U.N. article that stated that the UN supports the CTBTO's findings that that plane never crashed or exploded. thanks

[Hervé]

... and, so what?

What I posted remains valid as far as instrumentation and recording distances go!

They can rule out only a big explosion or a big crash; nothing else!

[panopticon]

Posted by Operator (here)

Posted by panopticon (here)
---
The Chief Coordinator of the Joint Agency Coordination Centre, Air Chief Marshal Angus Houston (Ret'd), has confirmed that whilst conducting an acoustic search this afternoon a RAAF AP-3C Orion aircraft has detected a possible signal in the vicinity of the Australian Defence Vessel Ocean Shield.
---

Orion P3's can drop off several buoys to faster determine an area of interest from a wider
range and direct other vessels toward it. I still makes no sense why they didn't do this
much sooner after the disappearance ...

Yeah I remembered you mentioning that the other day Operator and it's interesting that they were finally deployed on the 9th (coincidentally receiving a faint signal fairly quickly from a receiver at 1000 foot).

Commodore Leavy was talking about their deployment in the 9th April press conference:

Peter Leavy: The short answer is the utility of submarines has been evaluated and it was—when we first started commencing this search, and it was determined that the Collins class submarine would not be optimised for this search. What we do have today, as Air Chief Marshal Houston just mentioned, is a RAAF—A Royal Australian Air Force P-3 aircraft deploying a series of sonar buoys in the field. That does provide more sensors in the vicinity of Ocean Shield without having a ship there to produce the background noise.

The way that will work is an acoustic processor in the aircraft has been modified, some very good work that was only started after the MH370 aircraft was lost, some very good work by the Australian Defence Force and in particular the Air Force, have modified the acoustic processor to be able to pick up the 37.5 kilohertz frequency and we expect any time now the aircraft, the first aircraft out with Ocean Shield will be coordinating with her to lay a sonar buoy pattern. Sonar buoys essentially a sensor package that's parachuted out of the aircraft, floats on the surface of the ocean and will deploy a hydrophone 1000 feet below the surface of the ocean and a sonar buoy that floats has a radio in it that transmits the data back to the aircraft.

Each P-3 is capable of carrying 84 sonar buoys on each mission and so that will provide a sensor, a range of sensors, a number of sensors at least 1000 feet below the surface. The Towed Pinger Locator is obviously much deeper than that but at least it does provide a range of sensors 1000 feet down which are 1000 feet closer to the possible source of the pinger locator beacon on the ocean floor.

The other point I would make is—and Angus Houston mentioned this—is the silt cover on the bottom as well as potentially hiding the debris. Now that we have an analysis that shows there is silt down there, that's quite an absorbing material so we are at risk of a lot of the sound energy being absorbed by the silt rather than if for instance it was a rock sea bed, a lot of that would be reflected back up to the surface or towards the surface. So the fact that there's silt there has also hindered, to a certain extent, the sound path propagation.
Source

-- Pan

[Roisin]

Amzer Zo... if you think CTBTO is lying about that, then you should

address your opinions on their results to those scientists who work at that agency.

But rest assured, they would require that you at least have a PhD in Physics to even

voice your opinion on their statements wrt that plane.

[panopticon]

Posted by Amzer Zo (here)
... and, so what?

What I posted remains valid as far as instrumentation and recording distances go!

They can rule out only a big explosion or a big crash; nothing else!

For CTBTO's information page on this see here.

There are lots of qualifiers "could", "potentially", "may" etc. Just because its been reported that they found "no evidence" doesn't mean that there wasn't an event beyond the range of their sensors. It just means that they are reporting that their sensors didn't pick up any evidence...

-- Pan

[sigma6]

all this searching by the US military is pointless if they were in on it...

[panopticon]

Posted by sigma6 (here)
all this searching by the US military is pointless if they were in on it...

What searching by the US military?

I asked above if anyone knew what US vessels were involved in the search.

Do you know how many US vessels/aircraft are involved because I've not found much data on US involvement?

-- Pan

[Roisin]

Posted by panopticon (here)

Posted by Amzer Zo (here)
... and, so what?

What I posted remains valid as far as instrumentation and recording distances go!

They can rule out only a big explosion or a big crash; nothing else!

For CTBTO's information page on this see here.

There are lots of qualifiers "could", "potentially", "may" etc. Just because its been reported that they found "no evidence" doesn't mean that there wasn't an event beyond the range of their sensors. It just means that they are reporting that their sensors didn't pick up any evidence...

-- Pan

That's not true but you can go ahead and interpret that scientific data to fit whatever opinion you are operating from any way you want but none of what you are saying on this adds up to a hill of beans because none of you here have PhD's in Physics.

That agency clearly stated that that plane did not crash and/or explode. Period

And of course in the case of say... a nuclear bomb going off, you can bet your boots that if it went off in some remote place high up in the Himalaya's somewhere, they would be the first ones to know that too!

[Ron Mauer Sr]

Posted by Operator (here)
<snip> Orion P3's can drop off several buoys to faster determine an area of interest from a wider
range and direct other vessels toward it. I still makes no sense why they didn't do this
much sooner after the disappearance ...
<snip>

Some possible reasons that sonobuoys were not deployed earlier:

1. Insufficient resources. (Not likely)
2. The public would be more suspicious if sonobuoys were never deployed.
3. The aircraft has crashed into the sea and the powers-that-be want to keep the location a secret. (Probable if there is something on the aircraft they want to keep secret.)
4. The powers-that-be have the aircraft and plan to use it again in another false flag operation. (False flag operations have been very popular in the community of psychopathic control freaks.)

Considering military presence in the area, and the capabilities of warships, aircraft and satellites to track potential threats, *especially an aircraft the size of a Boeing 777 flying in an unexpected area*, it is a safe bet that the aircraft location has always been known.

[Atlas]

Posted by Amzer Zo (here)

Posted by buares (here)
Notice the date and the long list of websites:
[...] What say you ?

These data do not rule out nor exclude anything else!

@Amzer Zo, this was my answer to Roisin who was contesting the date of the release of the data to the media, on the 11th of March, 4 days after the plane vanished.

[Hervé]

Posted by buares (here)
[...]

@Amzer Zo, this was my answer to Roisin who was contesting the date of the release of the data to the media, on the 11th of March, 4 days after the plane vanished.

I posted it because it contained this relevant piece of info:

The 7 closest certified and operational IMS infrasound stations (green icons) are located over 2000km (I06AU, Cocos Island) from the last known position of the plane.