Canadas Hidden History, Kevin Annett

[delfine]

http://texaspaganlady.blogspot.dk/20...on-artist.html

[East Sun]

David Icke has done extensive research into practices of Satanism, ritual sacrificing of children, among Church, Monarchies, Politicians world wide and written about them in many of his books.

Of course he covers a wide spectrum on many things in his books also.

He is without a doubt an authority on the subject.

[Cardillac]

@buares

I hope this finds you well-

I listened to your provided video https://youtube.com/watch?v=XOYWEi6lXCI twice- who is this "Jeremiah Jordan" entity briefly mentioned in the video supposedly involved with Kevin Annett?- no explanation-

anyway, the Mohawk nation does not vehemently spit Annett out; in fact, they wish him all the best (listen carefully to the extremely polite closing statements)- could it be this Jeremiah Jordan character was an infiltrator funneled-in to discredit Annett?- I don't think we should rule that out-

the world out there is extremely complicated and any whistleblower is constantly under threat of character assassination (if not physical)- we all know this already-

please continue to be well-

Larry

[Axman]

Cardillac-
That would be a very interesting read if you feel inclined to post it.

The Axman

Posted by Cardillac (here)
Hi Flash-

my commentary is fundamentally based upon the pediatrician's own personal testimonies regarding her own experiences with Mother Teresa (they weren't pleasant according to her story)- I don't think Renate was lying- she was much too much a true altruistic, loving person to lie-

then add the info about MT available at Vatileaks.com; am not sure Vatileaks is a 100% reliable source but much of what is stated in the website conforms with Renate's personal testimonies:

then read Bill Cooper's "Behold a Pale Horse" for more info about Pope John Paul's rather shady history-

and the world isn't "f***ed-up?"

please stay well-

Larry

[Cardillac]

@Axman

Hi Axman- hope this finds you well-

I'll try to keep this short; the pediatrician Renate (really cool lady- + pretty) was a true altuistic in as far as she would during her own designated vacation time(s) fly at her own expense to some third-world country (usually Africa) and work for free just to help (she had many interesting stories)- it was always her dream (thanks to MSM reports looong before the internet) to work for this 'wonder woman,' made the necessary arrangements and flew to India only to get the shock of her life: Mother Teresa was ANYTHING but the way she was portrayed in MSM- after the fact, Renate stated "never again"-

according to Renate, Mother Teresa did no work whatsoever/never lifted a finger; she was good at Gestapo-like ordering people around to do the work (all were treated like s**t), and at the end of the day where credit was due no-one was thanked; MT jockeyed herself yet again into position to take all credit for everything and beg for more donations- Renate said MT's constantly jockeying herself into position for the media actually delayed/hampered the work-

this is just the surface; I recall Renate's testimonies so vividly because I was back then so shocked by them; but nothing shocks me anymore-

Larry

[Nasu]

Yup, seems like he's all about the attention. Even IF, there were some internationaly accepted court, the UN, whoever, to give this tale a fair unbiased trial, who the hell would enforce its judgement either way? Remember we are talking about on one hand the leader of the largest religion on the planet, the worlds largest land owner, the worlds largest holder of gold reserves, supposed and on the other hand the queen of half the world, over 30 plus commonwealth countries, including Austrailia and Canada, just to mention two biggies....

What a load of tosh, what a waist of all our time, even if it's all true, every last sorded detail, nude monarchs and ninth circle cardinals dancing drunk on shots of baby blood and whiskey.....

Whatever, let's focus on more achievable aims, healthy living, community preparedness, self reliance..

F them all, let them eat cake with those rounds of shots, it's our job, IMO, to get on with changing ourselves first, let the others tread their own path, for me, I will continue to be a warrior on the path to wholeness, irrespective and divergent from whoever thinks that they rule me.....

Good luck with that, I'm married... N

[panopticon]

Posted by Cardillac (here)
I listened to your provided video https://youtube.com/watch?v=XOYWEi6lXCI twice- who is this "Jeremiah Jordan" entity briefly mentioned in the video supposedly involved with Kevin Annett?- no explanation-

The name mentioned is Jeremiah Jourdain who is reportedly a 78 year old Elder of the Cree and Metis Nations and also the host of ITCCS email correspondence (some reports indicate that this is a pseudonym of Kevin Annett as is ITCCS Court Secretary Mr. George Dufort).

Posted by Cardillac (here)
anyway, the Mohawk nation does not vehemently spit Annett out; in fact, they wish him all the best (listen carefully to the extremely polite closing statements)- could it be this Jeremiah Jordan character was an infiltrator funneled-in to discredit Annett?- I don't think we should rule that out-

For completion here is the announcement requesting Annett's assistance made by the Mohawk Elders back in 2010 or 2011:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Es109fRbMYQ

The fact that the Mohawk Elders handled this with respect show that they understand the magnitude of it. I suspect they thanked Annett because they were not going to get into a long drawn out discussion about the reason why they are doing it and also because Annett is reportedly happy to sue anyone who speaks against him. I've seen similar things handled a lot worse and commend these Elders on their decision to use this approach as it allows them to retain their power and re-exert control over the investigation all while limiting their liability in the Courts.

I had never come across Kevin Annett until a thread on this forum a while ago. It was explained that he had been a major participant in the exposing of Indigenous Canadian's mistreatment and deaths under the Residential School system. I have an interest in Australian indigenous inclusion and community development. Within this area there are many similar stories of abuse and mass murder that have been exposed over the years. The indigenous Australian Stolen Generation is just one area that shows how easy it is for power to be exerted by the State on minority groups for what the State views as being for their, the minority groups, own good (this form of State paternalism is exerted through what is known as "legitimate coercion").

I've spent a while writing this post because this is a very contentious subject. I was not going to comment on Kevin Annett @Avalon because I do not view it would be of any use. I only came across his name in a post here and decided to look at the way he had acted as part of a case study concerning success stories involving non-indigenous advocates working with indigenous persons.

There is way too much emotion in responses concerning Kevin Annett to be able to have a discussion about the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS) or the International Common Law Court of Justice (ICLCJ). Which is why I hadn't up until this post.

This emotion goes back to Annett's association with a movement that involved indigenous persons in Canada seeking an enquiry into deaths and mistreatment at Church & State run "Residential Schools". Annett produced a documentary on this which evidently bought the indigenous peoples requests for an inquiry to the attention of the general population. This documentary is titled 'Unrepentant: Kevin Annett and Canada's Genocide':

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=gqUvhDG7x2E

Now, I went on to research Annett and the indigenous movement calling for the inquiry. The reason I did this is because I have an interest in similar enquiries that occurred in Australia (ie the Stolen Generations -- report available here) as well as the present removal of children from their parents (under various protection orders) as reported on page 6 of the December 3rd 2008 Koori Mail (there's lots of evidence in relation to this but the Koori Mail article gives a good overview).

I stopped researching the Canadian case, as presented by Annett, not because I thought it was incorrect, rather I started to suspect that there was an agenda behind Annett's involvement. When working with indigenous persons (in Australia at least) it is important to not act as a spokes person as that removes power from those presenting their story, reinforces colonialism by presenting a paternal element to the relationship (between indigenous and non-indigenous persons, though sometimes this may be required when assisting people in getting their individual story told, it is not the case in major investigations like this) and in some instances can change the story being told through use of power (not easy to explain but involves discourses around cultural difference, language differences, dominant cultural interpretation amongst other things). There is a lot more to it and it became quickly apparent that Annett had re-assumed the familiar role of "pastor to a flock". This is not appropriate and while many of the people he has helped would view his participation as a positive thing the problem lies in what seems to have happened.

The official Canadian 'Indian Residential Schools Truth and Reconciliation Commission' (official website here) is on-going and is expected to hand down its findings later this year (though it might request an extension to its mandate [source]). The Annett run 'The Truth Commission into Genocide in Canada' produced the 1998 summary report 'Hidden From History: The Canadian Holocaust' which has Royce White Calf mentioned in as a supporter/contributor to Annett's work. What then happened was I looked for interviews with Royce White Calf concerning the Truth Commission Into Genocide in Canada and his corroboration with Annett. Remember, at this stage I was doing general background on what I thought was the work of a man who was trying to do "good things". When I started reading reports written by/attributed to Royce White Calf I started to see a different, all to familiar, picture.

Now, some of these have been downplayed as being from an FBI stooge posing as Royce White Calf but others (like this round-table with someone who claims to be Royce White Calf [very good highlight is around the 21:45 to the 24:30 mark]) rings true with my knowledge of indigenous people in Australia. Again, this all comes back to indigenous persons reclaiming and/or building their power/position within non-indigenous society. It is not something that can be given or delegated to someone not part of the indigenous persons discourse (ie a white fella can't talk for a black fella unless the black fella says "talk for me so the white fella understands"). For a non-indigenous person to do anything other than exactly what is directed runs the risk of removing power and reinforcing the pre-existing control paradigm. The pastor/flock approach doesn't see anything wrong with doing something other than directed and that is the basis of removing children from parents "for their own good".

In the end everything to do with the investigation into the residential schools program should be done/presented in such a way as to be culturally sensitive while assuring empowerment to those indigenous persons affected (either directly or indirectly) by it. Anything less serves as a way to "Whitewash" (a derogative indigenous term for colonial cover-up) and return authority to self proclaimed protectors of the dominant culture.

There is a lot more that can be said on this and I don't doubt that there are many who are ardent supporters of Annett's protection of indigenous persons, and rightly so. However, from my knowledge in indigenous affairs, there has been a problem with Annett's handling of the residential schools case. By producing a documentary about indigenous genocide, yet placing his name in the title, showed an intent to take centre stage which is readily visible in his documentary. Everything else that followed was predictable (yes I've even read the decision handed down by the United Church on his removal -- here) and while the creation of an online citizen court has appeal, it needs to be remembered that it actually has no real power other than presenting online web content.

Once again, in no way am I calling into doubt what has been alleged by witnesses in Annett's documentary, nor in any of the commission hearings, relating to the residence school program. I have seen similar testimony given within the Australian context and do not doubt these accusation. What I ask is that persons who are going to defend Annett (of which I do not doubt there could be a number) remember that the persons who have been abused are where the focus should be, not the person/s who proclaim themselves as their protector.

-- Pan

[Cardillac]

@panopticon

ooh, Lordy, Pan, what an incredibly detailed response- and I thank for this; I wish I had the time to respond to all of your incredible expoundings at the moment but I don't (and I'm sure I'm doing us both a dis-service at the moment- please forgive me)-

but just for starters: Annett was de-frocked in a corrupt judicial system (aren't they all corrupt?- the judicial systems in CAN/AUS/USA or anywhere else in the world are no different)-

" By producing a documentary about indigenous genocide, yet placing his name in the title, showed an intent to take centre stage"- well, YES- honey, someone, somewhere (a publicized "individual") has to take centre stage, otherwise the masses can't deal with it (what, a massive group behind something?- what?- that's a 'conspiracy theory'!)-

yes, you could be right that Annett's work exists exclusively in the internet (or as one previous poster commented the itccs only has a cell phone nr.)-

that may all be true but we need to START SOMEWHERE to get the truth out there- even if it's just the internet aethers-

please continue to be well-

Larry

[panopticon]

Posted by Cardillac (here)
@panopticon

ooh, Lordy, Pan, what an incredibly detailed response- and I thank for this; I wish I had the time to respond to all of your incredible expoundings at the moment but I don't (and I'm sure I'm doing us both a dis-service at the moment- please forgive me)-

but just for starters: Annett was de-frocked in a corrupt judicial system (aren't they all corrupt?- the judicial systems in CAN/AUS/USA or anywhere else in the world are no different)-

" By producing a documentary about indigenous genocide, yet placing his name in the title, showed an intent to take centre stage"- well, YES- honey, someone, somewhere (a publicized "individual") has to take centre stage, otherwise the masses can't deal with it (what, a massive group behind something?- what?- that's a 'conspiracy theory'!)-

yes, you could be right that Annett's work exists exclusively in the internet (or as one previous poster commented the itccs only has a cell phone nr.)-

that may all be true but we need to START SOMEWHERE to get the truth out there- even if it's just the internet aethers-

please continue to be well-

Larry

G'day Larry,

I'll wait for your response to my post, though it wasn't directed at you specifically. I merely answered your question in relation to Jeremiah Jordaine and hypothesis on the Mohawk Elders. The remainder of the post was not at you nor in response to your post, rather it continued on from Buare's and my own train of thought in relation to this. (The remainder of this post is not directed @Larry).

As I said, I was interested in doing a case study on best practice that compared non-indigenous persons assisting indigenous persons in different countries. The basis of this would have been in relation to Freire's ideas around minority oppression and only the oppressed being able to help heal their oppressors (see Freire's Pedagogy of the Oppressed). This may seem counter-intuitive, however it is well respected in the education and indigenous affairs sectors (in Australia at least). In this respect, as I stated above, a non-indigenous person talking on behalf of an indigenous person can do more harm than good. This is mirrored in statements by Royce White Calf (see previous post) and a number of other indigenous Canadian Elders more in general.

There were lots of well respected indigenous persons who were talking about their mistreatment (prior to the 'Unrepentant' documentary) in the mainstream. Here's Phil Fontaine's interview on CBC from 1990 as an example:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=gZhwEUULSzk

Then there's George Erasmus' statement during the Royal Commission hearings about the residential schools and mistreatment by the structural institutions that were responsible for the children's well being. This mirrors the treatment that occurred to Australian indigenous people and resulted in the Stolen Generation (here's a website with some members of the Stolen Generation talking about the effect it had on them).

For example, in a statement prepared and approved by B.C. First Nations Chiefs and leaders forwarded in December 1992 it is stated:

The federal government established the system of Indian residential schools which was operated by various church denominations. Therefore, both the federal government and churches must be held accountable for the pain inflicted upon our people. We are hurt, devastated and outraged. The effect of the Indian residential school system is like a disease ripping through our communities.
Source

In addition the Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples (1996, Vol 1, Section 2, Part 10) has a section set aside on Residential Schools in which it states:

The persistently woeful condition of the school system and the too often substandard care of the children were rooted in a number of factors: in the government's and churches' unrelieved underfunding of the system, in the method of financing individual schools, in the failure of the department to exercise adequate oversight and control of the schools, and in the failure of the department and the churches to ensure proper treatment of the children by staff. Those conditions constituted the context for the neglect, abuse and death of an incalculable number of children and for immeasurable damage to Aboriginal communities.
Source

Have Indigenous Canadians been treated fairly? Of course not. Look at the Blackwater vs Plint case or the so-called Barney vs Canada case to see how the State takes control to limit damages (this is also mirrored in the recent decision in the Western Australian case involving the Collard family and their test case for compensation from the State).

Does this mean that non-indigenous people should take the lead and act as protectors of indigenous people (yet again)? I hope no-one who has had any contact with indigenous Elders would say yes to that. It is no-ones place to stand as a representative of indigenous people other than an indigenous person. I reckon the Phil Fontaine's, George Erasmus' and Dennis Eggington's of this world can talk well enough for themselves. Yes, support them by all means, but talking for them? Only an indigenous person can talk with authority about their treatment and how it has effected them. Anyone else is stealing their story/song.

Anyway, here's a nice little documentary (from the Where Are The Children website) for anyone who isn't sure what I'm going on about in relation to the Residential Schools. It can be viewed at Vimeo by following this link:
http://vimeo.com/27172950

-- Pan

[Limor Wolf]

Originally posted by panopticon: " Does this mean that non-indigenous people should take the lead and act as protectors of indigenous people (yet again)? I hope no-one who has had any contact with indigenous Elders would say yes to that. It is no-ones place to stand as a representative of indigenous people other than an indigenous person. I reckon the Phil Fontaine's, George Erasmus' and Dennis Eggington's of this world can talk well enough for themselves. Yes, support them by all means, but talking for them? Only an indigenous person can talk with authority about their treatment and how it has effected them. Anyone else is stealing their story/song."

Hello Pan, It is with pleasure and interest that I read your reasoned answers. I have only recently began to listen to Kevin Anette and am very greatful for the role he has taken upon himself. He, no doubt, is doing an important service to a world that has great need of disclosure and prevention of such disheartening matters. There are many children in this world that are abandoned to their fate in the hands of abusers and a sick system which is a threat to any healthy and supportive way of life for human beings. On that basis and with great respect to the indigenous people who I know has suffered greatly, but also am aware to their strength, determination and perseverance of their existance as nation and wisdom keepers which was so severely threatened. On that basis I need to ask -

Is it not that the fate of the children is more important than any 'game of honor'?

The consent to Kevin Anette was granted from the beginning, safe to assume, not without good reason. It is true that it all so delicate and sensitive and must be done within mutual respect and within agreement, but the notion that no one else can 'tell someone else's story', is not clear to me and based on seperation instead of cooperation, Has Kevin declared himself as their spokesperson? or has he just told the story of their children being taken and gone? Is there a way to steal someone's story/song by working for their best interest and the interest of humanity? Isn't it time to join forces without losing anyone's identity or tradition, but giving up on 'exclusivity'?

Saying that, the sensitivity is obvious for a community that had to endure so much, trust is no doubt an issue when you are endlessly battered.


Blessings ~

Limor

[panopticon]

Posted by Limor (here)
Is it not that the fate of the children is more important than any 'game of honor'?

Hi Limor,

My responses have mainly been in relation to the Residential School program in Canada (and its similarity to the Australian experience).

It is a very difficult area to negotiate what has happened/is happening and easy to get caught in the thinking that indigenous people need to be looked after by non-indigenous people. The people who took the children (in both Australia and Canada) were mostly thinking they were doing it in the best interest of the children. That's the trap. The children were taken in Australia and in some cases told that their parents either didn't want them or were dead. This was to disconnect the spiritual connection with country and decimate the culture. The Canadian experience appears similar. The people doing/saying these things, by and large, thought they were doing "good deeds".

The main problem when non-indigenous people start talking for indigenous people is that they often re-frame the way that indigenous people see things in a non-indigenous way. That was how the paternalism of colonialism worked (works) and why there were Protectors of Aborigines whose job it was to look after indigenous peoples "interests" (eg where they could go, who they could marry, what work they could do, where they could live etc [Source]).

My comments in relation to Annett relate to the way he is reported (by the indigenous people he worked with) to have operated in Canada and not really relevant to his ITCCS or ICLCJ websites. I responded mostly to Buares post of the Mohawk Elders and really don't see anything wrong with Annett posting youtube videos about various people telling their story (if he has their permission), nor his periodic cleansing of the Vatican and declaring whoever he wants as being guilty through his common law court. I'm an Anarchist so I wish him well (happy May Day BTW). Anywho...

In Australia non-indigenous people often really don't understand the Australian indigenous connection to country and its relation to their Dreaming. While this is not the same as the Canadian indigenous person's connection (their stories are different) it is just as important when non-indigenous people work with indigenous people that they respect the indigenous persons voice and their story. To not do this runs the risk of repeating the errors of the past and putting indigenous people through more trauma. I posted above an article in the Koori mail which talks to the possibility of this yet again occurring in Australia even though some of us are constantly vigilant.

I agree that in a perfect world cooperation would be central and there would be no power imbalances, racism (both overt and covert), paternalism and everyone would be working in the best interests of others. However, it isn't perfect, there are many competing discourses/stories that try to gain supremacy and/or work in competition with each other, there are dominant cultures and those that are dominated. That is why non-indigenous people working with indigenous people in Australia are trained to listen and try to never take the lead. That is judged as being the best way to overcome the cultural differences and risk of paternalism that so haunts those working in this field.

I had a mate of mine who was working as a remote area social worker. One of his jobs was to make sure the sick old indigenous people kept their Government money for food and medication. He had to try and stop it being taken by their children/grand children for grog or drugs. How do you fix that? Take the sick old people to a home where they can be looked after? They will cry because they have been forcibly removed from their country. What about take the children into custody or put restraining orders on them? Way to hard to police and no-one will report their family. What sometimes happens is the culture of grog and drugs gets challenged by respected Elders who lead by example. They change the grog culture (by making it a "dry camp" for example) and anyone who wants to drink does it elsewhere. Doesn't fix the original problem but once the number of people who drink all the time gets less, the number of people who say "no" to old folks getting their money stolen increases. Next thing my mate is visiting as a social worker who is checking up on his clients and not worried about getting in the way of drunken fights.

Notice, it was the Elders who solved it. No way that my mate could have. The Elders in this story used their position (based on respect) to change the grog culture after all the other approaches over the years had failed. These changes are often undertaken in cooperation with non-indigenous people (eg police, social workers) but it is the Elders who take the lead otherwise there would be a backlash within the community involved. In other words it's OK for my mate to help set it up but it is the Elders who make all the decisions and organise everything. If my mate was to try and get a camp to be dry it would not work because he'd be viewed as controlling what indigenous people are allowed to do which goes back to colonial paternalism and non-indigenous protectors...

It is all very complicated and sometimes people think they know better which results in things like the Northern Territory Intervention which was based on reported child abuse claims (in the Little Children Are Sacred report) and resulted in army troops being sent in. The Intervention has led to massive inequality, disadvantage, increased incarceration (adult 50%, juvenile 85%), suicides and trauma. BTW, the Intervention started in 2007 and is on-going so I'm not talking ancient history here.

I hope I've answered some of your questions Limor.

-- Pan

For more on the NT Intervention:

Australian Governments 2007 Human Rights Report & Recommendations
Australian Government Department of Social Security - Northern Territory Emergency Response
Inquiry Website for the Little Children Are Sacred Report
SBS Factbox: The 'Stronger Futures' legislation
Statistics On NT Intervention
Northern Territory Emergency Response (NTER) - “The Intervention”

[TargeT]

Posted by Cardillac (here)
Hi Flash-

my commentary is fundamentally based upon the pediatrician's own personal testimonies regarding her own experiences with Mother Teresa (they weren't pleasant according to her story)- I don't think Renate was lying- she was much too much a true altruistic, loving person to lie-

then add the info about MT available at Vatileaks.com; am not sure Vatileaks is a 100% reliable source but much of what is stated in the website conforms with Renate's personal testimonies:

then read Bill Cooper's "Behold a Pale Horse" for more info about Pope John Paul's rather shady history-

and the world isn't "f***ed-up?"

please stay well-

Larry

She was not what she seemed

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Nfivxyasp1g

Hell's Angel: 'Mother' Teresa

Agnes Gonxha Bojaxhiu ('Mother' Teresa) has been hailed the world over as an unsurpassed savior of the world's destitute.

In this video, broadcast on the BBC in 1994, however, Christopher Hitchens places the Roman Catholic nun, her ideology, and her activities under the microscope, and questions whether she deserved the praise she received.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=dSvFCwGmGow

ANYONE placed at the level of Teresa by the MSM should be instantly questioned and vetted.

[yelik]

Hi
I recently watched Kevin Annetts YouTube videos and was shocked and disgusted to think people are still capable of such acts. I have enjoyed reading people’s ideas, some of which are quite in-depth

I think we all need to be on our guard about the contents of all online information and be mindful that organisations like MI6/CIA/Bilderbergers/Vatican/Jesuits and so on are masters in the art of secrecy, deception and misinformation as well as having the power of the state behind them; they will always be a few steps ahead of the masses. By pushing out endless streams of true and false information, claims and counter claims will make it difficult to make neither head nor tale of stuff.

To me this is a bit like whether UFO’s or ET’s exist where virtually no physical evidence exists only peoples witness statements from sightings and experiences. If such evidence is given in a court of law under oath then it would be accepted. Steven Greer has 550 such statements so theoretically he should win any court case hands down, although I suspect you would not get far when matters fall into the category of national security.

If any of us has the time, we can try to see if other witness statements or reports corroborate any claims, the elites are aware that most people are pre-occupied with day to day living and just believe what the Government or media tell them, we are different.

In my opinion, we are all largely in a position of trying to make an informed decision based on the balance of probability. I totally agree with Pan, there is a risk that some distortions of the story may be taking place for various reasons, but, is this enough to discredit him, all people are entitled to make up their own minds, but should remain open minded and be prepared to change it in light of new evidence.

I try to simplify my thinking as far as possible and came at this from a slightly different angle. We know that satanic rituals have been practiced for many years in all countries. When a person is born into wealth, privilege and power they have a lot of time on their hands to consider the meaning of life and, in my opinion, be quite easily lead into thinking that somehow human torture, fear and sacrifices allows them to summon up some kind of demonic entity that would give them powers over mere man. Who knows, perhaps it might from a group psychological belief point of view. These people often exhibit psychopathic tendencies making them even more dangerous as rulers. Simon Parkes commented on the freemasons and their satanic rituals linked to aliens, so in my opinion this could well involve the illuminati/freemasons.

At the moment I believe the balance of probability support Kevin Annette’s claims, but am willing to change my mind.

Regards
Ian

[mysaskcan]

Posted by Cardillac (here)
The name mentioned is Jeremiah Jourdain who is reportedly a 78 year old Elder of the Cree and Metis Nations and also the host of ITCCS email correspondence (some reports indicate that this is a pseudonym of Kevin Annett as is ITCCS Court Secretary Mr. George Dufort).

Both Jeremiah Jourdain and George Dufort are fake personas used by Kevin Annett to create the illusion that he had support of the Metis/Cree and that the documents Kevin made up were legally valid. The documents issued and signed by George Dufort are actually signed by Kevin Annett, which makes them illegal and invalid.

Now, some of these have been downplayed as being from an FBI stooge posing as Royce White Calf but others (like this round-table with someone who claims to be Royce White Calf [very good highlight is around the 21:45 to the 24:30 mark]) rings true with my knowledge of indigenous people in Australia.

The above radio show hosts the Real Royce White Calf...whom I am glad to call my friend.

You have summarized what I have tried to bring to the public so perfectly and succinctly. Thank you for your comments.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

...or the alternative media for that matter...

[mysaskcan]

I submit my recent blog post as food for thought... http://stopkevinannett.wordpress.com/2014/05/10/1104/

-Thx

[STR]

Posted by Cardillac (here)
Hi Flash-

my commentary is fundamentally based upon the pediatrician's own personal testimonies regarding her own experiences with Mother Teresa (they weren't pleasant according to her story)- I don't think Renate was lying- she was much too much a true altruistic, loving person to lie-

then add the info about MT available at Vatileaks.com; am not sure Vatileaks is a 100% reliable source but much of what is stated in the website conforms with Renate's personal testimonies:

then read Bill Cooper's "Behold a Pale Horse" for more info about Pope John Paul's rather shady history-

and the world isn't "f***ed-up?"

please stay well-

Larry

I can somewhat confirm some of this with MT. I know a Benedictine Monk, well scratch that, an X-Benedictine Monk that left the order after 25 years. He was with MT on her death bed, one of the last to see her before she died and although I know little of the details other than to say something to the effect that her death bed confession or discovery that her entire life in Christianity was giant waste of a life time and pretty much told him so. It affected him so he left the order. A for real event, and a for real friend of mine among several other of the so called x holy men that once walked this planet with robes now discarded due to discovery that all is not as presented. Unfortunately for some this has shattered lives.

[ktlight]

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=TMA8M4llXd0

"Published on 11 May 2014
Kevin Annett: Common law sheriffs training to arrest UK Monarch, Popes Ratzinger & Bergoglio, seize Church property."

[scanner]

Posted by ktlight (here)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=TMA8M4llXd0

"Published on 11 May 2014
Kevin Annett: Common law sheriffs training to arrest UK Monarch, Popes Ratzinger & Bergoglio, seize Church property."

This should be interesting the Monarchs have a 1000 men all arm to the teeth and make a special pledge to protect them . I think the pope has a similar arrangement , I'll be watching this very closely .

[yelik]

Hi
I have been watching Kevin Annetts work and claims which appeared bizarre at first. However looking at his work he comes across as a principled person who feels compelled to bring justice, which will be a bumpy ride where most people give up on because of the poor odds of success.

I am surprised he has lasted so long, however the elites may well turn this inconvenience to their advantage because it could potentially cause religious unrest if it gets into main stream media.

We have seen the growth of our police state and apparent unrest in the military in the US which is worrying,. Make no mistake the UK authorities are quite capable of acting far worse than the US having perfected the control structure over 100 years. I believe US citizens view their rights and freedoms more seriously than the UK and tend to stick together. In the UK most tend to look after themselves, which is a weakness.

I had a ‘friend’ who informed me about 10 years ago that one of the main reasons why guns and knives were removed from society in the UK was because it was considered inevitable our health service, NHS, would likely fail at some point, probably by around 2020, so any unrest would be easier to contain and control.

Simon Parkes reminded us about the satanic rituals associated with free masonry, dark illuminati and reptilians, so this could well be connected. Satanic rituals go back 1000’s years and I can well imagine the sick elites of our world with too much power and time on their hands would be drawn into such practices which stimulate and feed their insatiable desire to experience the ultimate control over life and death.

[Taurean]

It makes sense now why the Irish problem has been allowed to drag on for so long.

We now have thousands of "Street Battle Trained Reservists"