...Creepy PRISM Front? "Email Genome Project"

[Operator]

Posted by Tesla_WTC_Solution (here)

Posted by Operator (here)

Posted by Tesla_WTC_Solution (here)
Compare these logos!
....

Ever compared these images ?

...
Did they do that on purpose??
...

Yep, you bet! They even managed to get the square and compass in (sort of) ... look at the center of the envelope !

P.S. and more or less 4 pyramids ...

[Tesla_WTC_Solution]

I can't believe the Java thing was true!!!!

Everyone here was worried, lol -- at least Bobd and me

I don't even program, only thing I've done was a TINY bit of html...!!!

I think a two year old could spot these "spies" in TED clothing.!!

Can you believe this is what they expect the average American (not to mention the people overseas who really got screwed) to swallow?

What are we gonna do, insider trade shoelaces or something?

[Tesla_WTC_Solution]

Please read ASAP -- today's denial of service is worse than ever

the YUI.YAHOOAPIS script HACKER hole:

http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/inde...t-1103243.html

March 22nd, 2009, 07:58 PM
Why is it that, whenever I navigate to a link on this site, my computer transfers data to/from yui.yahooapis.com (http://yui.yahooapis.com)? Is the owner of this site secretly sharing our user info with a mysterious third party. (Ooo-Eee-Ooo)

If you go to that address, you'll find it is 404 Not Found... according to Yahoo! The site yahooapis.com (http://yahooapis.com) leads to developer.yahoo.com (http://developer.yahoo.com), which is home page for the Yahoo Developer Network.

Why this data transfer with Yahoo developers? Inquiring minds want to know.

A. cardinals_fan
March 22nd, 2009, 08:07 PM
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=904808

In short, it lets the admins host javascript off the forum servers.



A. Mehall
March 22nd, 2009, 08:26 PM
Thanks, sisco311 and cardinals_fan.

But get this: try to navigate to yui.yahooapis.com (http://yui.yahooapis.com) and you get 404 Not Found error. That address is no longer extant. So why continue sending data there?

404 = no index.html home.html .php, .aspx, etc, etc.

Just because something has nothing to show to you, doesn't mean it's not doing anything.
Polygon




Polygon
March 23rd, 2009, 06:01 AM
yeah, yahooapis is similiar to googleapis.com, it just has some useful javascript api's that people can link to and use without having to write their own.

and a 404 means its just not responding to a http request, it doesn't mean it doesn't respond to other types of requests.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

http://www.overclock.net/t/1174721/y...com-what-is-it

yui.yahooapis.com - what is it?

yui.yahooapis.com - what is it?

I'm just wondering, because when I'm staring at my screen and waiting 12-20 seconds for the page to finish loading, that's what it sometimes says it's waiting for.

Edit: As requested, I'm attaching page load times to most of my posts. Fasterfox reports this one took 6.8 seconds to load. Not bad!

Weird. After editing this post, the edit isn't showing up for me when I view the thread?
Edited by Kramy - 11/27/11 at 2:21am

¤=[Post Update]=¤

http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2014/02/...-surveillance/

Facebook, Google, Yahoo reveal details of NSA surveillance
Published February 03, 2014FoxNews.com

The Internet’s biggest companies have released a sliver of new information on the government’s national security requests, a small bit of fresh data about the widespread surveillance that has shaken the public’s belief in online privacy.

A compromise brokered last week between the Justice Department and Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, Facebook, and LinkedIn allowed those companies to at last release some information about the number of requests for information the government served through Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) courts. Before the deal, the law stipulated that surveillance agencies could demand users’ personal information and bar a company from even discussing the request.

"Last summer’s revelations about government surveillance remind us of the challenges that secrecy can present to a democracy that relies on public debate,” wrote Google’s Richard Salgado, legal director, law enforcement and information security, in a blog post about the new data.

The new information doesn’t reveal a great deal.

Google said that it received somewhere between 0 and 999 requests every six months under the law; the number of users or accounts the court sought data on varied, and was never presented specifically Among requests in which user information was demanded, the most data was sought between July and Dec. of 2012 -- somewhere between 12,000 and 13,000 users.

Google admitted that the information was helpful, but not complete.

“We still believe more transparency is needed so everyone can better understand how surveillance laws work and decide whether or not they serve the public interest,” Salgado wrote.

Data from the other companies revealed similar snippets of information, again limited to data bands of 1,000. Requests peaked from Jan. to June of 2013, when Yahoo was served between 0 and 999 requests for information on as many as 30,999 user accounts.

In similar posts, LinkedIn, Facebook and Microsoft offered some information on FISA requests, and said they would push to be allowed to publish more. All companies noted that the new data was at least a step in the right direction.

“Yahoo will continue to protect the privacy of our users and to ensure our ability to defend it,” wrote Ron Bell, general counsel, and Aaron Altschuler, associate general counsel, law enforcement and security, in a blog post on the company’s Tumblr site. “This includes advocating strenuously for meaningful reform around government surveillance, demanding that government requests be made through lawful means and for lawful purposes, and fighting government requests that we deem unclear, improper, overbroad, or unlawful.”

___________________________

I KNO WUT U GOOGLED LAST SUMMR

[tnkayaker]

Posted by Tesla_WTC_Solution (here)
If I didn't know better, I'd think people were afraid to give thumbs up to an NSA thread, LOL

Just kidding, i understand --

*pokes NSA in the eye* stop staring

i guess that alot of people dont know it may be illegal for "our" ptb to gather info directly on us without reason and legal channels (usually, i mean as far as we know)) , but its not illegal for other counties to gather whatever info and how much data they want to gather on who ever right out of the sky from satellites, then trade it back to us for our gathered info on who ever we may have gathered data on, i dunno i just heard it used to work that way, prolly things are way different now a days .......right .

[Tesla_WTC_Solution]

http://money.cnn.com/2014/03/21/tech...html?hpt=hp_t2

Microsoft defends its right to read your email
By Jose Pagliery @Jose_Pagliery March 21, 2014: 12:47 PM ET



NEW YORK (CNNMoney)
Microsoft is defending its right to break into customers' accounts and read their emails.

The company's ability -- and willingness -- to take such an approach became apparent this week. Microsoft (MSFT, Fortune 500) admitted in federal court documents that it forced its way into a blogger's Hotmail account to track down and stop a potentially catastrophic leak of sensitive software. The company says its decision is justified.

From the company's point of view, desperate times call for desperate measures.

"In this case, we took extraordinary actions based on the specific circumstances," said John Frank, one of the company's top lawyers, in a blog post Thursday night.

According to an FBI complaint, Microsoft in 2012 discovered that an ex-employee had leaked proprietary software to an anonymous blogger. Fearing that could empower hackers, Microsoft's lawyers approved emergency "content pulls" of the blogger's accounts to track it down. Company investigators entered the blogger's Hotmail account, then pored over emails and instant messages on Windows Live. The internal investigation led to the arrest on Wednesday of Alex Kibkalo, a former Microsoft employee based in Lebanon.

Although the move could be perceived as a breach of trust, Microsoft says it's allowed to make such unilateral decisions. It pointed to its terms of service: When you use Microsoft communication products -- Outlook, Hotmail, Windows Live -- you agree to "this type of review ... in the most exceptional circumstances," Frank wrote.

Microsoft's legal team thought there was enough evidence suggesting the blogger would try selling the illegally obtained intellectual property. In such instances, law enforcement agents would typically seek a warrant, but Microsoft said it didn't need one. The servers storing the information are on its own property.

Ginger McCall, a director at the Electronic Privacy Information Center, said those actions are deeply troubling, because they show "Microsoft clearly believes that the users' personal data belongs to Microsoft, not the users themselves."

"This is part of the broader problem with privacy policies," she said. "There are hidden terms that the users don't actually know are there. If the terms were out in the open, people would be horrified by them."

Microsoft recognizes that it's a sensitive topic, especially as the nation grapples with revelations about the extent of warrantless surveillance on Americans by their own government -- spying that Microsoft and other major tech companies have loudly criticized.

That's why Microsoft is instituting a new policy: In the future, it'll loop in an outside lawyer who's a former federal judge and seek his or her approval.

In a move that might be deemed ironic, Microsoft will now add its own internal searches to its biannual transparency reports on government surveillance.


First Published: March 21, 2014: 11:40 AM ET

[Tesla_WTC_Solution]

UGHHHHHHHHHHHH Yahoo is so sucky.



Most reported problems:

Read mail (41%)
Log-in (35%)
Send mail from Yahoo (23%)



We're experiencing some technical difficulties...

We’re sorry, but Yahoo Mail can't load due to a temporary error. You can try back again shortly, or visit our help pages for ways to troubleshoot the issue.
Temporary error: 15
Visit Help for troubleshooting instructions



ARGH!!!!!!!!

[Tesla_WTC_Solution]

Heads up: Yahoo! server failures and squirrelly failures/censorship at an all time high today (at least on my end)

last night some ISP issues that spontaneously resolved.

I feel that certain folks could very well be under attack this week (truthers) and TPTB are trying to wear us down on multiple fronts before another 'storm hits the world.

Don't let these animals get ya down, guys, and consider changing from yahoo to a better provider,
these people are just a mainline for Spooks IMO.

it's been getting progressively crappier ever since the CEO made her NSA claims.
not sure if the company is getting bad feedback or what is going on.

hate to sound paranoid but i think it is possible political.
was discussing some very sensitive things recently (last 24) and I am under cyberattack today (although minor)



these little things, to make you feel "gaslighted" as Flash put it once,
they sting and disorient and feel like personal failures but it's the System failing.

[Tesla_WTC_Solution]

Yet another evening of Yahoo! MAIL being the only site that won't work tonight.

What on earth could be going on w/ their garbage lol

never in my life seen this type of constant error/server down etc with any email.
even the military crap was better than yahoo! has been this week.


tsk not even considering the programs they let in the door,
Yahoo just sucks period.