Page 1 of 6 1 6 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 114

Thread: Russia and VT point the Finger for 9/11: Did the Israelies plant nukes in the towers? Nuke cancer in victims.

  1. Link to Post #1
    Taiwan Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    17th January 2014
    Location
    Asia, mostly H.K.
    Posts
    688
    Thanks
    321
    Thanked 1,816 times in 505 posts

    Exclamation Russia and VT point the Finger for 9/11: Did the Israelies plant nukes in the towers? Nuke cancer in victims.

    [ Mod-edit: the following post was originally made a day later. I merged two threads and moved this post to the top of the merged thread. The two stories are closely related. Together, they provide powerful new evidence that Israelis planted nukes demolished the WTC towers on 9/11, supported by grievous evidence of extensive deaths and illness from cancer (of the sort usually only found in nuclear bomb exposure) in 9/11 victims. While the two reports can be separated, the subsequent discussion overlaps almost entirely. -- Paul. ]

    ===


    Russia and VT point the Finger: Were Israelis the Villains in 9/11 ?

    "Russia's very angry at the US and Europe for the hypocrisy that they have shown in the Ukraine,"
    says Gordon Duff of Veterans Today. So they have revealed a secret, about the Israelis:
    "They are accused of being guilty of nuclear proliferation" (passing on US weapons)...
    and: "Storing nuclear weapons in Israeli Embassies."


    It is not a gun... but can be a sort of weapon


    To be accurate below the Title of this post: Duff and VT seem to be the ones who are doing must of the "dot connecting" with 9/11.
    But the possibility of there being a meaningful link is very real based upon what is in the documents.


    My own guess is:
    The Russians may have released these documents to give a warning to the US and others (Europe? Israel?) that Russia may have some data that will allow them to make a stronger connection between 9/11 and Israel.

    Gordon Duff's Interview with Mike Harris:


    Duff writing in VT:
    Too Classified to Publish: Bush Nuclear Piracy Exposed
    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/05...iracy-exposed/

    Some of the most important "DOTS" that the article connects are:

    + According to a retired FXX agent specializing in Israeli counter intel: The type of nuclear devices used on 911 were a modified version of the W-54 nuclear artillery shells that were covertly provided to the Israelis between 1988 and 1998 from US surplus stockpiles illegally exported during the Bush/Clinton era. Chemical analysis done by DOE Sandi was able to identify the chemical/radiation footprint or fingerprint of the warheads based on samples taken after 911 of the fallout at ground zero. (Editor’s note: Nuclear weapon use at ground zero is confirmed from multiple sources)

    + Melted steel and iron oxide or “nano thermite” is a byproduct of the very high gamma ray / Neutron flux induced into the central steel core. The radiation dissolves the steel into iron oxide consuming the carbon and silicone in the steel. This explains the missing steel columns and the very important clue of the “vaporized’ 20 ton antenna tower atop the south tower. The upward blast of radiation literally vaporized it. Video evidence proves this to be true. (Editor’s note: Tower issue a vital one.)

    + It appears that the weapon of choice for the Israelis were the W-54 and follow on series of nuclear pits taken from the Amarillo TX storage dump. This was what Carnaberry was working on for Bush senior in Houston. A total of over 350 pits were transferred to the Israelis over a 10 to 20 year period of time. The W-54 type of pit design were the most desirable due to the 2 point implosion pit design.

    + These are stored in most Israelite embassies for ease of deployment. The one’s used on 911 were kept at the Israeli consulate in NYC until put in place. After 911 the FBI now checks all diplomatic pouches with a Geiger counter before entering or leaving the US.

    + Illegal distribution of US nuclear material to foreign allies was not limited to Israel. Virtually all NATO allies were in on this scam too. Dick Cheney was the bad guy on this one. Bush2/Cheney traded nuclear pits to foreign country as IOU’s in order to get what they wanted.


    = End of Excerpts =

    This is potentially explosive material.

    Will anyone, apart from some writers on VT and a "friendly" podcaster like Mike Harris connect the dots in this way?

    We shall see !

    I have a sense that Russia could tell America much more about its own history, than what has come through in the corporate controlled press. Are they now threatening TPTB that they will do just that - Tell the Truth - if the US squeezes it too hard in the Ukraine? This looks to be like another move in the big chess game that is going on.
    Last edited by GuyFox; 23rd May 2014 at 22:17.

  2. Link to Post #2
    United States Avalon Member spiritguide's Avatar
    Join Date
    6th April 2011
    Location
    Minnesota, U.S.
    Posts
    1,634
    Thanks
    13,369
    Thanked 7,731 times in 1,479 posts

    Exclamation Nuke Cancer from 9/11 Revealed.... Veterans Today article.

    Article lead in...

    Tuesday, May 20th, 2014 | Posted by Gordon Duff

    Nuke Cancer from 9/11 Revealed

    By Gordon Duff and Press TV


    A new and terrifying 9/11 conspiracy has hit the news. We are now confronted, not only with startling proof that 9/11 was a “nuclear event,” but that there have been thousands of unreported deaths in New York, radiation cancers and nearly 70,000 being kept alive with experimental stem cell therapy and physically devastating “chemo.”

    One of the biggest medical cover-ups in history was exposed this week when Wall Street brokers suffering from cancer after 9/11 made the news. While telling their story, the New York Post revealed that 70,000 New Yorkers have applied for 9/11 victim compensation, most for cancers that can only be attributed to direct exposure to ionizing radiation from nuclear weapons.

    Officials would not give a breakdown of cancer victims, but 10,800 downtown workers make up the second-largest group of registered claimants after 39,500 Ground Zero responders. There are another 16,600 in smaller categories such as residents, students, child-care and health-care workers.

    Finance workers engulfed in dust and debris from the Twin Towers’ collapse say the attacks — and returning to Wall Street a week later, when officials insisted it was safe — triggered their diseases.”

    There is no other established cause, not “toxic soup” or irradiated drywall. In fact, the 70,000 victims represent the largest cancer cluster in history, even more victims than survivors of both Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined, the only other similar “spike” of multiple myeloma cases.

    Of the 70,000 victims, over 90% say they were exposed within a one-square-mile area. Yet the cover-up has been so thorough that only one death has been “officially reported” and only a small number of victims have been paid compensation due to a “system” ripe with denial, disinformation and corruption.

    NUKES, NOT PLANES AND PANCAKES
    The official cause of the collapse of the three towers at the World Trade Center was a terror attack involving two airplanes. We are told that the towers simply collapsed because they were built without a central core and heat had weakened the steel on the poorly designed structure.

    Studies by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, however, tell a different story, that of the most powerful buildings on earth with massive steel cores and a design capable of withstanding aircraft crashes, earthquakes or fires without significant structural damage.

    The third tower, Building 7,”simply fell for no apparent reason. No answers were given and when questions were asked, the answer was “Building what?”

    The “official report” simply made it all up, junk science and perjured testimony. For the cancer victims of 9/11, the lying is still going on.

    Were one or more of the three towers destroyed on 9/11, the victim of “nuclear demolitions?” An article in the New York Post outlining the largest “cancer cluster” in history may well do exactly that.

    WHERE THE “NUKE” CLAIMS COME FROM
    Recently, stories attributing the destruction of the World Trade Center to “nano-thermite” were spread across the news. They originated from “Gawker,” a website for New York-based media insiders.

    The first time nuclear weapons were mentioned involving 9/11 was when former Soviet nuclear intelligence officer, Dimitri Khalezov, wrote of being briefed by his government that nuclear demolitions had been planted under the World Trade Center.

    Khalezov told of a September 12, 2001 meeting with Mossad operations chief Mike Harari and other Israeli intelligence specialists including Harari’s son.

    At a celebratory brunch in Bangkok, according to Khalezov, the Israelis took credit for the planning and execution of the 9/11 attacks. Khalezov presented proof, including a copy of Harari’s passport, issued under a false identity but with a clearly recognizable photo.

    In 2007, a team of FBI agents flew to Bangkok to interview Khalezov. Their investigation was of specially built aircraft they said crashed into the twin towers, each containing, according to the FBI, a small nuclear weapon.
    They also interviewed Khalezov about the Pentagon attack and his belief that a stolen Granit missile had been used.

    According to authoritative sources, “Lord of War,” Victor Bout, the CIA gun runner portrayed by Nicholas Cage in the film, Lord of War,” was extradited to the United States where he is imprisoned, not for the charges the public is told of, but for supplying the missile used to attack the Pentagon.

    No mention is made of who Bout’s co-conspirators were.
    In 2010, sources within the Defense Intelligence Agency began working with an operational hypothesis that the twin towers were destroyed with advanced “neutron-like” weapons that left no radiation signature. They believe that multiple weapons were used, not only in the towers themselves but in the subbasement as well.

    Reports by investigative journalist Jeff Prager outlining underground fires lasting months along with the almost total lack of wreckage is seen by many as a very strong confirmation of the DIA hypothesis.

    THE CONTINUING COVERUP
    After 9/11, tens of thousands of Americans developed cancer. Many died but no one will ever know how many. That number is, for some reason “classified.”

    By 2006, the Village Voice had begun to write about the cancer epidemic and Dr. Larry Norton of Sloan Kettering Memorial Medical Center cited that something in the dust may have caused the cancer outbreak. Norton demanded a detailed study be funded, but no study followed.

    In fact, there was never any evidence that the “toxic dust” was, in fact, any different than what New Yorkers had been breathing for decades. Why should it have been?

    They had been demolishing buildings in Manhattan for a century. Then the reports became more bizarre.
    Stories were circulated that the World Trade Center was built with Chinese drywall containing radioactive phosphor-gypsum. However, no “Chinese drywall” had been imported to New York at that time nor was any used in the World Trade Center construction.

    Then again, there is no evidence that small amounts of radiation could have caused the massive spike in cancers, with up to 70% of the tens of thousands of first responders suffering according to Dr. Norton.

    THE “NUCLEAR TEST” CANCER
    The cancer is multiple myeloma. Victims are told they got it from breathing “toxic soup” from 9/11, mostly drywall dust. The number of victims who have thus far applied for benefits from the 2.7-billion-dollar 9/11 fund, as reported in the New York Post story, that number is 69,900.
    There is one known direct cause for this disease, exposure to a nuclear explosion. Multiple myeloma is also known as “the Hiroshima disease.”

    Studies at both Los Alamos and Livermore Labs show little increase, no more than 4%, for minor radiation exposure. There are no other established factors, no “toxic soup” that can cause this disease.

    From Cancer Compass:

    “Some research suggests that there are certain multiple myeloma risk factors increase a person’s chance of getting multiple myeloma. Farmers and petroleum workers exposed to certain chemicals also seem to have a higher-than-average chance of getting multiple myeloma. In addition, people exposed to large amounts of radiation (such as survivors of the atomic bomb explosions in Japan) have an increased risk for this disease.”

    In 1988, Congress established (Radiation Exposed Veterans Compensation Act Pub. L. 100-321) those diseased attributed to ionizing radiation from nuclear explosions. Listed as “Number 2” under leukemia is multiple myeloma.

    Link to the rest of this informative and lenghtly article...

    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/05...-911-revealed/

    The comments section of the article are worth reading also.

    Peace!

    Post script... The question is why the CDC and the AEC are not all over this with reports and bulletins?
    Last edited by spiritguide; 21st May 2014 at 13:05.
    Perceive beyond the box!


    " A warm handshake and a smile will lift more people than any elevator in the world. " - L. Hamel

  3. The Following 44 Users Say Thank You to spiritguide For This Post:

    A Voice from the Mountains (15th January 2015), animovado (24th May 2014), Bassplayer1 (22nd May 2014), Billy (21st May 2014), brenie (23rd May 2014), Cardillac (21st May 2014), Carpathian (22nd May 2014), ceetee9 (23rd May 2014), cursichella1 (22nd May 2014), Deega (5th July 2014), Dennis Leahy (23rd May 2014), fourty-two (22nd May 2014), grannyfranny100 (27th May 2014), guayabal (22nd May 2014), Herbert (23rd May 2014), Hervé (21st May 2014), heyokah (21st May 2014), Jean-Marie (21st May 2014), joeecho (21st May 2014), Journeyon (22nd May 2014), justntime2learn (22nd May 2014), Krist (23rd May 2014), Maia Gabrial (23rd May 2014), Mandala (21st May 2014), Matt P (21st May 2014), mountain_jim (23rd May 2014), Möbius (24th May 2014), Nasu (24th May 2014), Nine (24th May 2014), Referee (27th May 2014), Rocky_Shorz (23rd May 2014), Sean (8th July 2014), seeker/reader (25th May 2014), Sidney (21st May 2014), Sierra (22nd May 2014), Star Tsar (24th May 2014), Sunny-side-up (22nd May 2014), syrwong (23rd May 2014), Tesla_WTC_Solution (21st May 2014), ThePythonicCow (21st May 2014), william r sanford72 (22nd May 2014), wnlight (21st May 2014), yelik (21st May 2014), Zaya (21st May 2014)

  4. Link to Post #3
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    22nd February 2014
    Location
    Lexington, KY
    Age
    55
    Posts
    953
    Thanks
    6,393
    Thanked 9,037 times in 927 posts

    Default Re: Nuke Cancer from 9/11 Revealed.... Veterans Today article.

    I was just coming over to post the same article. Well done spiritguide. I can think of no better way of honoring the opening of the 9/11 memorial.
    Wow, how do New Yorkers put up with this crap?

    A great companion read to this is the one Gordon published yesterday or the day before about where those nukes came from:

    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/05...iracy-exposed/

    Matt
    Fear is simply a consequence of a lack of information.

  5. The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to Matt P For This Post:

    Cardillac (21st May 2014), ceetee9 (23rd May 2014), cursichella1 (22nd May 2014), Dennis Leahy (23rd May 2014), grannyfranny100 (27th May 2014), Hervé (21st May 2014), Krist (23rd May 2014), Maia Gabrial (23rd May 2014), Nine (24th May 2014), Rocky_Shorz (23rd May 2014), spiritguide (21st May 2014), Sunny-side-up (22nd May 2014), Tesla_WTC_Solution (21st May 2014), ThePythonicCow (21st May 2014), william r sanford72 (22nd May 2014)

  6. Link to Post #4
    France Avalon Member araucaria's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th January 2011
    Posts
    5,403
    Thanks
    12,061
    Thanked 31,021 times in 5,006 posts

    Default Re: Nuke Cancer from 9/11 Revealed.... Veterans Today article.

    Well, if Wall St is saying that 911 was an inside job, that is really going to put the cat among the pigeons.


  7. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to araucaria For This Post:

    Cardillac (21st May 2014), cursichella1 (22nd May 2014), Dennis Leahy (23rd May 2014), Krist (23rd May 2014), Nasu (24th May 2014), Omni (15th January 2015), spiritguide (21st May 2014), Sunny-side-up (22nd May 2014), Tesla_WTC_Solution (21st May 2014), yelik (23rd May 2014)

  8. Link to Post #5
    Germany Avalon Member
    Join Date
    31st May 2010
    Location
    SW Germany
    Age
    70
    Posts
    1,764
    Thanks
    2,372
    Thanked 9,228 times in 1,663 posts

    Default Re: Nuke Cancer from 9/11 Revealed.... Veterans Today article.

    all I can say to spiritguide's posting is: read Dr. Judy Wood's monumental "Where Did the Towers Go? for an "alternative" view of 9/11-

    is there anyone out there in "Avalonian Land" who has not yet read this book!?- if not, you might want to get off of this website and read her book- just a suggestion-

    please be well all-

    Larry

  9. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Cardillac For This Post:

    cursichella1 (22nd May 2014), grannyfranny100 (27th May 2014), Krist (23rd May 2014), Observer1964 (23rd May 2014), Rocky_Shorz (23rd May 2014), spiritguide (21st May 2014), Sunny-side-up (22nd May 2014), Tesla_WTC_Solution (21st May 2014)

  10. Link to Post #6
    United States Avalon Member Zaya's Avatar
    Join Date
    14th April 2014
    Posts
    356
    Thanks
    874
    Thanked 1,622 times in 310 posts

    Default Re: Nuke Cancer from 9/11 Revealed.... Veterans Today article.

    Wow. You know, I remember a year or two ago when the firefighters were ALL sick and fighting for health rights and such. I would venture to say that it was related, no? This is damning for the folks that don't want the truth to get out there. The real test will be whether MSM picks it up or not. Some people will dismiss anything if it doesn't make it there...
    "The only wisdom is in knowing that you know nothing." -Socrates

  11. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Zaya For This Post:

    Cardillac (21st May 2014), cursichella1 (22nd May 2014), grannyfranny100 (27th May 2014), Hervé (21st May 2014), joeecho (21st May 2014), Krist (23rd May 2014), Nasu (24th May 2014), Rocky_Shorz (23rd May 2014), spiritguide (21st May 2014), Tesla_WTC_Solution (21st May 2014)

  12. Link to Post #7
    United States Avalon Member spiritguide's Avatar
    Join Date
    6th April 2011
    Location
    Minnesota, U.S.
    Posts
    1,634
    Thanks
    13,369
    Thanked 7,731 times in 1,479 posts

    Default Re: Nuke Cancer from 9/11 Revealed.... Veterans Today article.

    Quote Posted by Cardillac (here)
    all I can say to spiritguide's posting is: read Dr. Judy Wood's monumental "Where Did the Towers Go? for an "alternative" view of 9/11-

    is there anyone out there in "Avalonian Land" who has not yet read this book!?- if not, you might want to get off of this website and read her book- just a suggestion-

    please be well all-

    Larry
    Gordon addresses this in the comments section of the article. Judy's book reveals more of the toys available to the cabal. High energy can dustify at the right frequency whether nuclear, light or sound according to the present findings of science.

    Peace!
    Perceive beyond the box!


    " A warm handshake and a smile will lift more people than any elevator in the world. " - L. Hamel

  13. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to spiritguide For This Post:

    Cardillac (21st May 2014), cursichella1 (22nd May 2014), grannyfranny100 (27th May 2014), Krist (23rd May 2014), Nine (24th May 2014), Rocky_Shorz (23rd May 2014), Tesla_WTC_Solution (21st May 2014), william r sanford72 (22nd May 2014)

  14. Link to Post #8
    France Honored, Retired Member. Hervé passed on 13 November 2024.
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,763
    Thanks
    60,315
    Thanked 96,056 times in 15,482 posts

    Default Re: Nuke Cancer from 9/11 Revealed.... Veterans Today article.

    Quote Posted by Zaya (here)
    [...]

    The real test will be whether MSM picks it up or not. Some people will dismiss anything if it doesn't make it there...
    If MSM ever picks it up it will be for damage control... keeping the actual "how & why" out of sight.

  15. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    cursichella1 (22nd May 2014), joeecho (21st May 2014), Krist (23rd May 2014), Maia Gabrial (23rd May 2014), Referee (27th May 2014), Rocky_Shorz (23rd May 2014), seeker/reader (25th May 2014), spiritguide (21st May 2014), Tesla_WTC_Solution (21st May 2014), william r sanford72 (22nd May 2014), Zaya (21st May 2014)

  16. Link to Post #9
    United States Avalon Member Zaya's Avatar
    Join Date
    14th April 2014
    Posts
    356
    Thanks
    874
    Thanked 1,622 times in 310 posts

    Default Re: Nuke Cancer from 9/11 Revealed.... Veterans Today article.

    True, Amzer Zo. And I bet they would probably try to use the likes of Colbert and Stewart to cover these kinds of stories (as they did with the firefighters from 911, actually). As much as I love those shows, lately, I have been having the sinking feeling that they are being used as a "keep the young people thinking someone is on their side" sort of thing. They are there to act as a fake balancing act almost. Like - hey! Not everyone is praising the administration! Look! Look over here!
    "The only wisdom is in knowing that you know nothing." -Socrates

  17. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Zaya For This Post:

    cursichella1 (22nd May 2014), grannyfranny100 (27th May 2014), Hervé (21st May 2014), joeecho (21st May 2014), Krist (23rd May 2014), Maia Gabrial (23rd May 2014), Rocky_Shorz (23rd May 2014), spiritguide (21st May 2014), Tesla_WTC_Solution (21st May 2014), william r sanford72 (22nd May 2014)

  18. Link to Post #10
    United States Administrator ThePythonicCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Language
    English
    Age
    77
    Posts
    30,076
    Thanks
    35,709
    Thanked 150,665 times in 22,998 posts

    Default Re: Nuke Cancer from 9/11 Revealed.... Veterans Today article.

    Two absolutely devastating reports ... I've learned more about the technical details of 9/11 in the last half hour than I had in years prior.

    Thanks.
    My quite dormant website: pauljackson.us

  19. The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to ThePythonicCow For This Post:

    cursichella1 (22nd May 2014), grannyfranny100 (27th May 2014), Hervé (21st May 2014), Krist (23rd May 2014), Maia Gabrial (23rd May 2014), mountain_jim (22nd May 2014), Nine (24th May 2014), Referee (27th May 2014), Rocky_Shorz (23rd May 2014), Roisin (3rd June 2014), Sean (8th July 2014), Sierra (22nd May 2014), spiritguide (21st May 2014), Sunny-side-up (22nd May 2014), Tesla_WTC_Solution (21st May 2014), william r sanford72 (22nd May 2014)

  20. Link to Post #11
    United States Administrator ThePythonicCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Language
    English
    Age
    77
    Posts
    30,076
    Thanks
    35,709
    Thanked 150,665 times in 22,998 posts

    Default Re: Nuke Cancer from 9/11 Revealed.... Veterans Today article.

    Quote Posted by Cardillac (here)
    all I can say to spiritguide's posting is: read Dr. Judy Wood's monumental "Where Did the Towers Go? for an "alternative" view of 9/11-

    is there anyone out there in "Avalonian Land" who has not yet read this book!?- if not, you might want to get off of this website and read her book- just a suggestion-

    please be well all-

    Larry
    Quote Posted by spiritguide (here)
    Gordon addresses this in the comments section of the article. Judy's book reveals more of the toys available to the cabal. High energy can dustify at the right frequency whether nuclear, light or sound according to the present findings of science.

    Peace!
    I've read and followed Judy Wood for years, and supported her fine work.

    My take was that she showed evidence that the WTC towers were not taken down by "conventional" (large, external to the building) nuclear bombs. But I don't recall her closely addressing the potential of a small, focused, nuclear explosion internal to the building or its basement.

    I also suppose that nuclear explosions of most any sort could produce "exotic energy weapon" effects, such as those Judy Wood documents so well.

    Furthermore, I presume that multiple mechanisms were used, contributing to the confusion in analyzing this. But from these two Veterans Today articles, I now favor the conclusion that such small nuclear devices were the primary means of taking down the WTC towers, and that (Zionist bastards in) Israel played a critical role in providing and placing those devices.
    Last edited by ThePythonicCow; 23rd May 2014 at 06:28.
    My quite dormant website: pauljackson.us

  21. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to ThePythonicCow For This Post:

    cursichella1 (22nd May 2014), grannyfranny100 (27th May 2014), Krist (23rd May 2014), Maia Gabrial (23rd May 2014), mountain_jim (22nd May 2014), Nine (24th May 2014), Rocky_Shorz (23rd May 2014), Roisin (3rd June 2014), spiritguide (22nd May 2014), Tesla_WTC_Solution (21st May 2014)

  22. Link to Post #12
    Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    20th November 2012
    Location
    gone
    Age
    42
    Posts
    4,873
    Thanks
    15,814
    Thanked 18,722 times in 4,284 posts

    Default Re: Nuke Cancer from 9/11 Revealed.... Veterans Today article.

    I approvez of ze thread.
    But I feel sorry for the people -- even the rich ones -- who are stricken with diseases due to the funky radiation at ground zero.

    Wow at Veterans Today, brave people wot wot?

    Thank you Paul for your insight into this issue...


    "if you can't beat 'em, join 'em" i.e. get some sympathy from Big Money and the story can't stay suppressed.

    if Wall St wants revenge I am all for it lol.
    i would be pissed too if I was w/ Cantor Fitzgerald etc and was the sacrificial lamb that got sent to work on the Big Bad Day.


    p.s. not even mentioning the firefighters who were sent in to die courtesy of "whoever".

  23. Link to Post #13
    United States Avalon Member spiritguide's Avatar
    Join Date
    6th April 2011
    Location
    Minnesota, U.S.
    Posts
    1,634
    Thanks
    13,369
    Thanked 7,731 times in 1,479 posts

    Default Re: Nuke Cancer from 9/11 Revealed.... Veterans Today article.

    Explain the scent of the trail please. The trail I've been watching has been going in circles for years. VT has exposed a few more dots and has allowed another view of the likely scenerio. IMHO

    Peace!
    Perceive beyond the box!


    " A warm handshake and a smile will lift more people than any elevator in the world. " - L. Hamel

  24. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to spiritguide For This Post:

    cursichella1 (22nd May 2014), grannyfranny100 (27th May 2014), Roisin (3rd June 2014), ThePythonicCow (22nd May 2014)

  25. Link to Post #14
    United States Administrator ThePythonicCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Language
    English
    Age
    77
    Posts
    30,076
    Thanks
    35,709
    Thanked 150,665 times in 22,998 posts

    Default Re: Nuke Cancer from 9/11 Revealed.... Veterans Today article.

    Quote Posted by spiritguide (here)
    The trail I've been watching has been going in circles for years.
    Indeed .

    Quote Posted by spiritguide (here)
    VT has exposed a few more dots and has allowed another view of the likely scenerio.
    Agreed.
    My quite dormant website: pauljackson.us

  26. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ThePythonicCow For This Post:

    cursichella1 (22nd May 2014), grannyfranny100 (27th May 2014), Tesla_WTC_Solution (22nd May 2014)

  27. Link to Post #15
    United States Avalon Member cursichella1's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th April 2013
    Location
    California
    Posts
    840
    Thanks
    10,176
    Thanked 4,274 times in 763 posts

    Default Re: Nuke Cancer from 9/11 Revealed.... Veterans Today article.

    Quote Posted by Zaya (here)
    True, Amzer Zo. And I bet they would probably try to use the likes of Colbert and Stewart to cover these kinds of stories (as they did with the firefighters from 911, actually). As much as I love those shows, lately, I have been having the sinking feeling that they are being used as a "keep the young people thinking someone is on their side" sort of thing. They are there to act as a fake balancing act almost. Like - hey! Not everyone is praising the administration! Look! Look over here!
    You're 100% correct and can throw Bill Maher into the mix, as he is the (perhaps funniest and) guiltiest of all (and a 911 denier, btw). These 'liberals', along with their ridiculous (and non-funny) 'conservative' colleagues only serve to perpetuate the myth that our country is made up two separate factions. Nothing could be further from the truth.

    It is their perfect remedy to keep the nosey peons (that make up the American public) occupied so the puppet masters can continue doing what THEY want to do, all behind the scenes (Classified and compartmentalized - as matters of 'National Security', so for THEIR eyes and ears only).

    As for these cancers...it is tragic, but was predictable. The allowance by the media of these announcements (are we now to be led to sympathize with Wall Street?) is a bone thrown to keep us busy, again, chasing theories about what caused the buildings to fall, what substance causes what cancer, who covered up what...none of which is particularly relevant at this point.

    What IS relevant, extracting the cancerous, evil, Globalist creeps who have hijacked our legitimate government, because as is, an honest investigation into 911 (not that one is needed...I believe for the most part THAT has already been figured out) and legitimate indictments are not a part of THEIR plan.

    Why is Obama no different, perhaps worse, than George W. Bush? Why do liberals accept Obama's droning, NSA, war mongering? "He's a liberal, so we must really need these things." or "His hands are tied by the Republicans!" Why is Obama the polar opposite of what he promised to be?

    Forget that and look beyond...who have these two presidents and the majority of their predecessors surrounded themselves with in the form of "advisors" and Cabinet Members, both Official and unofficial? Why the revolving door between heads of the financial world, economic advisors and National Security?

    Regardless of "Party" affiliation, the majority of these folks are CFR and/or Bilderberg members and/or members of one of their other private, secretive, non-profit spinoff groups. Forget the Illuminati excitement for the moment as that may be legit but is hardly an angle to pursue when trying to STOP these people, as that hocus pocus is just one more distraction.

    Here, why on Earth is Dick Cheney still in the news, spouting off about Obama's weak support (as if!) of NSA programs and pretending that 911 could've been stopped??! A recent, primo example of the charade that the American public continues to buy into:

    Quote by Dylan Stableford, Yahoo News 4/1/2014
    In a speech at the Republican Jewish Coalition's spring meeting in Las Vegas over the weekend, former Vice President Dick Cheney slammed the "isolationists" within the GOP, defended the National Security Agency spy program and, of course, criticized President Barack Obama.

    Cheney's remarks were closed to the press, but audio of the speech obtained by Mother Jones was posted online Tuesday.

    "That we have created in the National Security Agency this monster bureaucracy that's reading everybody's mail, listening to everybody's phone calls, infringing upon our civil liberties and civil rights — hogwash," Cheney said at the March 29 event. "It probably would've allowed us to stop 9/11.''...
    Full Article http://news.yahoo.com/cheney-adelson...151630354.html

    Not only is he reinforcing the strong Defense neo-con angle, he's also:

    -Reinforcing/legitimizing his 'innocence' with respect to claims that he was one of several behind the 911 attacks.
    -Pacifying the pro-privacy rights folks into thinking that Obama is going to do away with the unconstitutional NSA programs, so we'll all forget about it and move on
    -Scaring us into thinking without the NSA 'protections', we're headed for another 911.

    The ONLY terrorists are guys like Cheney.

    Food for thought. Time to get off that couch! We need to stop what is tangible, here, in this physical world.

    Illuminati, good aliens, bad aliens, disclosure, whatever...real or not, kind of out of our hands. Human cockroaches manipulating our legitimate government, using legitimate, patriotic civil servants as their scapegoats*? That is where we can do something.

    Write to your representatives (this always causes panic, even in the CFR) but don't expect REAL results. Support term limits and campaign limits, alternative media, Privacy protection, 911 Truth, Whistleblowers, Constitutional Rights, Transparency and Net neutrality; fight Globalization and be LOUD about it.

    Ignore Left Right issues for the time being, as they won't matter if we aren't able to get a grip on the big issue. Even Global Warming or Global Cooling is irrelevant if we're not seeing legitimate studies by folks that haven't been influenced by threats of cut funding. Someone with balls needs to physically go and document whatever they can on Chemtrails - close up, so we know exactly what that is all about.

    EXPOSE all you can. Enlighten friends and family members. Encourage others to do the same. Don't let the NSA monitoring (intimidation) silence you! This is seriously late in the game. Most important, because it is so late in the game, support legitimate legal organizations that are willing to take on these causes on our behalf.

    OK, some venting, but needs to be said.

    Contact your representatives: http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml



    Quote How is CFR managed? Who is in charge?

    CFR is incorporated under New York State law. Its Board of Directors provides overall direction, and Richard N. Haass, the Council's president and a former senior government official, leads daily operations. Carla A. Hills, chair and chief executive officer of Hills & Company and former U.S. trade representative, and Robert E. Rubin, former secretary of the treasury, are co-chairs of CFR's Board of Directors, while David M. Rubenstein, co-founder and co-chief executive officer of The Carlyle Group is the vice chair.
    http://www.cfr.org/about/faqs.html

    Quote Robert Edward Rubin (born August 29, 1938) is an American economist and banking executive. He served as the 70th United States Secretary of the Treasury during the Clinton administration. Before his government service, he spent 26 years at Goldman Sachs, eventually serving as a member of the board and co-chairman from 1990 to 1992; Rubin oversaw the loosening of financial industry underwriting guidelines which had been intact since the 1930s.[1] His most prominent post-government role was as director and senior counselor of Citigroup, where he performed ongoing advisory and representational roles for the firm.[2] From November to December 2007, he served temporarily as chairman of Citigroup[3][4] and resigned from the company on January 9, 2009.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Rubin

    *Why were CIA and military "ineptitudes" blamed on the 911 failures, yet no one was fired?
    Last edited by cursichella1; 22nd May 2014 at 18:17.
    cursichella1


    Qui tacet consentit

  28. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to cursichella1 For This Post:

    ceetee9 (23rd May 2014), grannyfranny100 (27th May 2014), Hervé (22nd May 2014), Krist (23rd May 2014), Rocky_Shorz (23rd May 2014), Selene (27th May 2014), spiritguide (22nd May 2014), Tesla_WTC_Solution (22nd May 2014), Zaya (22nd May 2014)

  29. Link to Post #16
    United States Administrator ThePythonicCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Language
    English
    Age
    77
    Posts
    30,076
    Thanks
    35,709
    Thanked 150,665 times in 22,998 posts

    Default Re: Nuke Cancer from 9/11 Revealed.... Veterans Today article.

    I moved five posts from this thread to the thread Digression from discussion of 9/11, nukes and cancer.
    My quite dormant website: pauljackson.us

  30. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ThePythonicCow For This Post:

    cursichella1 (23rd May 2014), RunningDeer (23rd May 2014), Sierra (22nd May 2014), Tesla_WTC_Solution (22nd May 2014)

  31. Link to Post #17
    Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    20th November 2012
    Location
    gone
    Age
    42
    Posts
    4,873
    Thanks
    15,814
    Thanked 18,722 times in 4,284 posts

    Default Re: Nuke Cancer from 9/11 Revealed.... Veterans Today article.

    I was gonna post how angry that Rockefeller picture makes me, lmao.
    But the Digression thread is closed. I guess the people of Main Thread can smell "That smell again".

    :D

    How can these people be allowed to continue (Rockefellers) after saying such things??

    And my cousin Bret supports their int'l cabal, makes me SO SICKKK



    the thing is, they treat their int'l partners at least as bad as they treat the US people...
    why would anyone do business with sell outs like them?

    the only one of the family who isn't a complete scary muppet is the Democrat kid in WV lol.
    the only good thing i know of that he helped w/ was not closing the 130th.

    there is no such thing as a perfect unit but the 130th is darned close.

    and TPTB were gonna take everything they had and distribute it to losers in active duty.


    anyway that's my take on the Rockefellers.

    to THIS DAY they continue to come up when arson and real estate are discussed.

    whatever happened to WTC, they had a plan for a long time to build something even more profane there.


    really not impressed with the Djed pillar (1WTC) being raised on the tombs of the firefighters and people who were sent to die.
    even if Larry et all didn't profit from the disaster they still were able to move forward with evil plans.


    i think the plan to trash wtc was made before groundbreaking.

    1966 bohemian grove would have been a place to see -- i bet they were already talking about who would be blamed in 2000 when the towers finally were "permitted' to come down.


    @@

  32. Link to Post #18
    Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    20th November 2012
    Location
    gone
    Age
    42
    Posts
    4,873
    Thanks
    15,814
    Thanked 18,722 times in 4,284 posts

    Default Re: Russia and VT point the Finger: Were Israelis the Villains in 9/11 ?

    Oh MAN, this would make my grandmother turn green.
    Which usually means it's solid gold. teehee.

    (But what does Russia gain from Israel losing allies?)

    http://eng.globalaffairs.ru/redcol/R...Policies-15840

    NUKES/Syria

    Quote The only issue that seriously divides Russia and Israel is Iran and its nuclear program. Russia thinks a nuclear Iran is unpleasant but not fatal, while Israel sees it as an existential threat. Many signs indicate that the situation involving Tehran is coming to a head, one way or another. The Middle East has a reputation that everything happens according to a recurring pattern until something finally shatters that framework.
    Last edited by Tesla_WTC_Solution; 23rd May 2014 at 04:57.

  33. Link to Post #19
    Taiwan Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    17th January 2014
    Location
    Asia, mostly H.K.
    Posts
    688
    Thanks
    321
    Thanked 1,816 times in 505 posts

    Default Re: Russia & VT point the Finger: Were Israelis 911 Villains?

    A very good question, Tesla.
    And maybe this is why the info was leaked as it was done.

    Gordon Duff says that the Israelis are "pretending" to support Russia in the Ukraine, but their true role behind the scenes is very different.
    How can we, living outside the world of intelligence operations, possibly know the truth?

    The simple fact that these docs were released, is some evidence that Duff may be right.

    You might want to listen to the Video Podcast : https://youtube.com/watch?v=z0IQ9E5Sgzo

    ...to see if you agree with my short and punchy summary.
    Last edited by GuyFox; 23rd May 2014 at 05:19.

  34. Link to Post #20
    Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    20th November 2012
    Location
    gone
    Age
    42
    Posts
    4,873
    Thanks
    15,814
    Thanked 18,722 times in 4,284 posts

    Default Re: Russia & VT point the Finger: Were Israelis 911 Villains?

    If Israel is playing puppet w/ Nazis they better be damned careful!!

    It's like a rabbit holding a Doberman's leash!

    Thanks Guyfox

Page 1 of 6 1 6 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts