-
21st May 2014 16:31
Link to Post #2741
Avalon Member
Re: Enlightenment: The Ego, what is it? How to transcend it.
Hello Chris and everyone!
The thinking behind the suggestion that a teacher is not required on the spiritual journey is a fascinating topic
I wonder how much of what we are talking about here comes from a basic misunderstanding in the west, of the role of the teacher... There is a comprehensive book written about this by Alexander Berzin, called "Wise Teacher: Wise Student" http://www.berzinarchives.com/web/x/...305527811.html
Our history in the west is of controlling, often corrupt religious bodies and perhaps it is this troubled chronicle that has given rise to the belief that we're better off without teachers.
There isn't a tradition of teacher/student relationship in the west, and yet there seems to be an assumption that we understand the dynamics of such a connection. Some in the west speak as if they have moved beyond such a relationship, blazing a trail of spiritual empowerment and individuality, which is their individual choice - but I don't see how the timeless function of transmission (which is primarily what the function of a teacher is) can be replicated.
The distrust of spiritual teachers (which isn't in itself unhealthy) could arise from a distrust of ourselves, and our ability to discern truth from falsehood. Maybe we think of spiritual mentors as those who proclaim their wisdom and set themselves up above the ordinary person, which has a ring of authoritarianism. Maybe we see them as preying on the vulnerable and gullible, and brainwashing them for their own advantage.
And all this has happened, and will probably always happen. No one said the path would be easy. People are people…and that refers to teachers and students. But if you've never encountered an authentic teacher (and it's taken me decades to find one
) scepticism is perfectly understandable. There is always - as in any walk of life - a risk of an unhealthy relationship based on control, exploitation, dependence and fear. And that is where confidence in your own discrimination, and trust in your ability to be honest with yourself comes in: to be able to ask yourself whether the teacher is helping or hindering.
But…if we take the step to label all gurus as manipulators and their students as blind and desperate, we are simply stereotyping, and cutting ourselves off from a vast and profound resource. If we rely only on our own (fixed) viewpoint, and our inner seed of enlightenment, we could find that we have been merely dancing round in circles to the tune that our ego is merrily playing for lifetimes, to entertain us.
Westerners, who are educated to be individualists, have difficulty in grasping the concept that the guru is not so much a person as a function. Of course, the guru function depends for its performance on a human being, and therefore it always occurs in the context of a particular personality. This is what is the most confusing to Western students, who tend to get caught up in externals. —Georg Feuerstein
-
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to loungelizard For This Post:
animovado (22nd May 2014), GarethBKK (26th May 2014), greybeard (21st May 2014), Grizz Griswold (21st May 2014), joeecho (21st May 2014), Krist (22nd May 2014), Sunny-side-up (26th May 2014), Wind (21st May 2014), Zampano (28th May 2014)
-
21st May 2014 16:51
Link to Post #2742