WADE FRAZIER : A Healed Planet

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

The action might be over here today:


https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post838027

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Here are a few other observations, as I enjoy a little down time. One of my gifts was in math, and like many others with that gift, I crunch numbers for a living in the financial economy. It is kind of like the saying that you should never enter a restaurant through the kitchen: those producing the financial information that the current system uses are far less enamored of it than the consumers are. Eventually, I was able to see the clearly fraudulent nature of the financial economy, as the real economy, the one that runs on energy, declines:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/savings.htm#coming

I see many abuses of numerical data, in not only the financial world, but it has also been used to make science unnecessarily arcane, which was partly due to the battle that Galileo had with the Catholic Church. My essay has very little math in it, and the numbers I use are generally order-of-magnitude accurate, as that is all that is needed to get the concepts across. An example is this little addition/revision to my essay:


"Almost all traditional alternative energy sources and related technologies have low EROIs (direct solar 2-to-8, wind turbines 18, geothermal less than 5). Those alternative sources all have the same problems that wind and water power had before the Industrial Revolution and more, such as being intermittent, not much energy is available to begin with, and they all create environmental impacts that, while not as great as fossil and nuclear fuels, are still considerable. Wind turbines not only kill vast numbers of birds each year, but they are noisy and create inland turbulence. In order to replace fossil fuels, there would need to be about four hundred times as many windmills on Earth as there already are, and I have driven through several windmill farms in the USA, which are spread across many miles of suitable terrain. In order to raise humanity to the American standard of living, there would need to be far more than a thousand times as many windmills. There may not be enough suitable land on Earth to host those windmills, and windmills are considered the most viable traditional alternative. Direct solar, including photovoltaics, makes the most sense in deserts. However, it does not deliver much energy, but is considered the next most viable alternative, and there would have to be about four thousand times as many photovoltaic arrays as already exist to raise the world to the American standard of living. Again, finding the land to host them is a problem, and the materials need to be mined. There are maintenance issues and other problems. Brian O’Leary began his alternative energy career promoting the traditional alternatives, and the plan that he developed for American presidential candidate Mo Udall looked startlingly like what the winner of that election, Jimmy Carter, soon unveiled. In his last years, Brian called traditional alternatives too little and too late to solve our energy problems. Rock is not a good conductor, so heat is rapidly depleted from the geothermal source and it quickly goes “dry,” and has to go “fallow” to recover. Although the organized suppression inflicted on technologies such as my partner’s heat pump are partly why there is not much alternative energy technology on the market, their low EROI and low available energy are leading reasons why those traditional alternative energy sources are not viable replacements for hydrocarbon energy. Forty years after Jimmy declared the moral equivalent of war on energy, traditional alternative energy still amounts to less than 1% of American energy production. Zero-point energy technology dwarfs all alternative and mainstream energy sources, with available energy and EROIs that go off the scale."


All the time, I see people present numerical information with either misleading levels of precision, use them to make irrelevant points, or even use them to baffle the reader, not help inform them.

Einstein and Schroedinger were not fans of just crunching the numbers of quantum physics and getting the right answers; they wanted to understand what was really happening, and the quantum enigma that lies at the heart of quantum physics shows how scientists are not in touch with the bedrock of reality, and the best of them knew that:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy.htm#real

but the hack scientists have tried to turn science into an arcane priesthood, or when they played popularizer like Carl Sagan did, they kind of played Pope, with their inerrant dogma. Einstein avoided math in his work when he could, understanding the seductive limitations of it, kind of like those restaurant workers or accountants.

Time for chores.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

I am playing on two threads today, and after making this post:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post838142

I remembered something else that I was going to write about. As my posts on this site have shown, my upcoming essay has plenty of anthropology in it, and a great deal of archeology and paleontology. As I studied past civilizations and compared them to what people think of and visit as tourist attractions, it really hit me at times what modern audiences find attractive. Most preserved works what tourists flock to today are ancient elite monuments to themselves. One theory of ancient civilization is that when they built monumental architecture, it was to overawe visitors with an ostentatious display of wealth. It was a way to establish the view of wealth that the elites aspired to, and to impress the idea that joining or submitting to their polity was the wisest course of action.

The very first cities had ziggurats for the priesthoods, essentially the first elites, and the palace was close behind it, and those urban religions always cast the elite as deific figures or divinely chosen to rule, whether it was Mexico, Peru, Egypt, China, or Sumer. It was a universal feature of early civilization, always male dominated, with harems and other perquisites of their position. Even before civilization, grave goods show local elites being buried with ornaments, as elite status was something "naturally" arising with humanity, at least in a world of scarcity.

The necropolis at Giza needed all the surplus food for a century to construct it. Tutankhamun's death mask of gold:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tutmask.jpg

cost the lives of thousands of people, who were worked to death. The Taj Mahal is also an elite tomb, and that terra cotta "army" in China also marked the burial of a member of the elite, and people come from the world over to see those monuments to the elite. Do people marvel at the immense waste of time and energy to aggrandize those ancient elites? It does not seem that way to me.

When I toured Europe at 16:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/spirit.htm#europe

I visited about fifty cathedrals and churches, which were intended to establish a similar hegemony over people's minds and spirits. Today, people eagerly tour the Roman Coliseum, which was the site of endless bloodbaths, where people were forced to murder each other.

Those are all relics of barbaric times, which do not seem to be preserved and visited to remind us of how such times were, but celebrated as some wondrous ancient feat.

As scientists have been studying cave paintings and carvings of language into stone, the findings often showed that the cave paintings were often the work of horny teenage boys, of naked women:

http://www.livescience.com/7028-anci...-graffiti.html

http://www.livescience.com/3590-obse...000-years.html

and the deciphering the runes and other writings, often shows it to be nothing more than graffiti:

http://www.orkneyjar.com/history/mae...maeshrunes.htm

http://www.dandelionmag.ca/the-ancie...y-of-graffiti/

All the earliest writings that can be found were all accounting for elite tribute or tales that aggrandized the elite. Not much inspiring and high minded has survived to enlighten us from those past days, other than maybe showing how far we have progressed since then.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Here is another that issue I have repeatedly encountered on my journey, and is highly germane to my essay. Again, I was trained to be a scientist since childhood, and when that voice first spoke to me:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#voice

my formal science studies ended, and my essay is arguably the fruit of picking up my science studies again, but my adventures, especially those with Dennis, was really about science and technology in the real world, not academia.

When I resumed my science studies, that time not as a professional or somebody who aspired to be one, it was with real world experience of trying to bring disruptive energy technologies to market, and the sobering realizations that that path entailed. Because of my background, I encountered scientific dissidents early on, such as Brian O, and have encountered many works of "fringe science." However, when I dug into such works, they often fell apart under scrutiny. There was also plenty of legitimate stuff on the fringes, but it was relatively rare. Most of the fringe stuff was chaff, and I found that fringe enthusiasts, the kind that listened to Art Bell while driving trucks, did not even know what the orthodox position was before they adopted some fringe view. I also found that to be the case with even "smart" people on the fringes. "I do not believe in evolution or the Big Bang," I would often hear. When I asked them why, the answers were usually along the lines of "Because my Bible tells me so," or "I just do not like the idea." But it turned out that those "dissidents" usually did not even really know what the orthodox position was, or what the evidence supporting it was, or how the evidence that supposedly contradicted it fared under scrutiny. Disagreeing with the orthodox position, when you really do not even know what it is, is a good way to quickly get lost in the weeds, falling for the story told by the latest guest on Art Bell (and similar shows). I am very familiar with the limits of White Science, but that does not automatically make fringe science valid, or the latest natterings from the fringes.

Most of my essay is the findings of orthodox science. There are many areas where I consider it far more valid than the fringe stuff, while I also am aware of where orthodoxy is limited, and even in a straitjacket.

People need to at least become conversant with the orthodox position, and understand the process of science, before they fly off into fringe land; otherwise they chow down on chaff, thinking that they are eating wheat. That is an epidemic problem of the fringes.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

This is another strategic post. The vast majority of readers who encounter my essay will skim it, cut to the last chapter, and the like. Maybe they will get something out of it that way, but they are not going to be the people whom I seek.

A universal reaction to the idea of FE, for those who get beyond denial or fear of it (which is far less than 1% of the population – very few graduate beyond Level 5 http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#level5 ), is that they want to tell everybody in their social circles (friends, family, colleagues) the "good news." I have been there, done that, and have watched innumerable people do that, for nearly thirty years.

When Brian O went out to play the Paul Revere of FE in 1996, I had a pretty good idea of what he was in for, but I also knew that he would have access that I never will, and I looked forward to hearing how it went. Five years later, after witnessing the crazed reactions of scientists and academics at the very top echelon, he openly wondered if humanity was a sentient species:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#sentience

What Brian had yet to realize, and kind of went to his grave denying, was that almost nobody cared. I played at a far higher level of the game than Brian did, and I resisted that lesson until I had it beaten into my head:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#burn

Because almost nobody is willing to admit that truth, however, they keep trying out this and that. To admit that almost nobody on Earth cares for anything but their immediate self-interest is not a judgment, but just an acknowledgment of the reality on Earth today. The proportion of people who care about doing the helpful thing, even if their immediate reward for it is not evident, I estimated back in the late 1990s as maybe 1-in-5,000, and that might be optimistic. That is the sole reason for the predicament that humanity is in. The rest is noise.

I watched Dennis try to appeal to people's self-interest to make something happen, and he regularly appealed to scarcity-based ideologies (which are all egocentric at their root):

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#dominant

but the orgies of greed and fear that attend the pursuit of FE are easily susceptible to organized suppression, as I discovered the hard way. Hell, Godzilla almost never even needed to roll out of bed, as the efforts self-destructed, or at most, they only needed a nudge by Godzilla's minions (or lower level predators) before it spiraled into a flaming collapse, wreaking devastation far and wide.

Almost all FE newbies, however, are like those 18-year-old boys, pining for the battlefield:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/war.htm#business

Even the best of them just have to go out and find out some of the harsh truth for themselves, and sometimes I just have to sit and watch them rush forth, heading for the abyss, and I cannot even stop them. I really do not like to watch or even hear about it. My better pupils will at least heed to my words of caution enough to not jeopardize their lives, careers, or relationships too much, and they eventually come to me, saying," Well Wade, you were right. But now what?" Such pupils have yet to understand what I am trying to do, but they are now at least willing to listen.

Again, those are just the numbers. If only 1-in-5,000 really cares much, and I do not mean them being heroes, but just caring enough to really do something, question their indoctrination, and the like, the odds are long that anybody who understands my message will have anybody else in their lives who will, as the social circle that people can manage is only about 250 people. So, using those numbers, maybe 1-in-20 of the people who really understand my message will find somebody else in their life who will. And those are people who really understand. If they really understand, they will also know that virtually nobody in their lives will, because they have already had some kind of awakening experience and already saw how their new perspective was received by those around them.

Having one's heart in the right place is more important than all other qualities put together, but it will not be quite enough to become a productive member of the choir. They also have to have the mental horsepower to deal with the complex ideas and information that underlies a comprehensive perspective, and this is where I am doing far more than reaching the readers I am seeking halfway, as I have spent most of my "free time" since 1990 diving into diverse areas of science, politics, economics, and so on, deconstructing them, understanding them from the bottom up, seeing what they had in common, what the differences were, and I have presented what I found in a fairly-easy-to-read essay, with thousands of links for readers to go deeper and develop a comprehensive perspective without having to be a scientist or top-flight academic. I have scientists, academics, and some very bright people reviewing my essay right now, helping to make sure that I do not make any grievous errors. We will see how that process goes, but I am not anticipating anything that will cause me to revise my essay much. I tried to stay within the confines of what I was confident of competently presenting, and what I think will be adequate for developing the level of awareness that I think people need to keep their eye on the ball and not be distracted by the bread and circuses purveyed by the social managers and those mesmerized by the spectacle.

It has taken me forty years to arrive at the approach that I am about to try out in my "spare" time, and it is very much unique, to my knowledge. Nobody I know of, who has survived on the FE battlefield for long, has ever attempted what I am about to. It might not help at all, but raised awareness is never wasted, in the big picture of the journey of our souls through physical reality.

On one hand, the heavy lifting is done for me in this lifetime. I am far from finished, but I have an approach that I am going to try out, and I will not be dissuaded by newbies who have to rush out and "do something," those enamored by the inventor-of-the-hour, the inventor who approaches me with his/her gizmo, expecting The Muppet Movie ending, and the like. I have already experienced and seen what will not work, have seen enough carnage for a lifetime, and have no interest in those naïve and inexperienced approaches. If that means that the choir begins with five people, and I can’t get the first candidate to hit the notes for five years, then so be it. I am seeing better numbers than that already, but I will not be goaded by the impatience and desperation (and, frankly, misunderstandings) of others, and since the path to delivering technology, which is ultimately the goal, is to give it away, in a completely transparent setting, the psychopaths, provocateurs, and other opportunists are going to have a hard time cracking that nut.

I am now editing some of the other essays on my site, mainly those older ones from the 2002 version of my site. The fluoride and Columbus essays are the oldest ones on my site, researched and first written in 1997-1998 (with small revisions in 2001, and odds and ends since then), and I recently revised my Columbus essay:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/columbus.htm

and the others will have similar revisions, to update them for my style today, new information, and the like.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

This essay is going to be kind of difficult to integrate into my site, but I wrote it with that in mind. For instance, I wrote about enzymes and the fluorine ion in the essay, intending to connect it to my revised fluoridation essay. As I revise the fluoridation essay, I am making the cross-essay references, and the below is one of my revisions to the fluoride essay.


The fluorine ion disrupts hydrogen bonds. When chemicals are combined, atoms with a higher bonding affinity will “steal” the bonds from other atoms, and a negatively charged ion will have a higher attraction to a positive charge than a negatively charged atom in a covalent bond, where one atom is merely hogging the electrons, as is the case with hydrogen bonds. Because it holds its electrons more tightly than any other element, fluorine forms the smallest negatively charged ion of any element, and that small size allows fluorine ions to go where the larger ions of other elements cannot. Those fluorine ions can get in close ad replace the hydrogen bonds in numerous enzymes and DNA, which wrecks the enzyme. In biology labs today, fluorine ions are the preferred way to poison enzymes, as they break the "lock" that the "key" will fit into, making the enzyme useless. The fluorine ion acts similarly to “free radicals” in the body. That is how the fluorine ion harms or kills people, and it can lead to genetic damage when it attack's DNA's hydrogen bonds.

Another common industrial element, chlorine, which is in fluorine's chemical family, behaves similarly, and the chlorine issue is another one where chlorine is undoubtedly carcinogenic, among other health hazards, but industrial propaganda and criminal activity prevents meaningful chlorine regulation. Chlorine is the other element compulsorily added to the water supply, to kill microorganisms.

No scientist will dispute the idea that fluorides are deadly poisons, as it is universally accepted. Among the hazards of fluoride are dental fluorosis, skeletal fluorosis, sterility, birth defects, cancer, and brain damage.

Dental fluorosis progresses with increased fluorine ion concentration as follows. First, the teeth develop a mottled look. Flecks can be seen on the enamel. Tooth mottling can begin at less than one part per million ("PPM"), which is the concentration added to the water supply in communities that fluoridate their water. As the concentration rises to two PPM, the teeth discolor, gradually turning brown. Accompanying this process, the teeth become hard and brittle. The teeth then begin chipping and disintegrating. While the mechanism of fluorine destruction and "protection" of teeth has been obscure during the era of fluoridation, recent research has shown that the fluorine ion inhibits the enzyme that forms enamel, which causes malformed enamel. Somehow, malformed enamel protects teeth, at least in the eyes of fluoridation proponents. In Frank McClure’s Water Fluoridation, The Search and the Victory, there is a color photo section showing the progress of dental fluorosis. In advanced cases, the teeth are reduced to blackened stumps (images of this process are easily available on the Internet). With skeletal fluorosis, the skeleton disintegrates.


I will publish the fluoride essay revision before I publish the big essay, and there will be some links to the essay, but they will be kind of blind links, but will link to the relevant text when I publish the essay.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Well, that was fast:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/fluoride.htm

I am sure that I could have spent more time on it, like another day or so, but that will have to be good enough for now. Less opinion, more fact, fewer adjectives and adverbs, and more nouns and verbs…. Those are some of the writing lessons I learned since I first drafted that essay back in 1998. It still kind of reflects that youthful approach, but less so than it used to. My big essays – war, medicine, American Empire, and cover-up essays, will likely get the most work. That energy essay is going to be hard, and I might mostly leave it alone. My upcoming essay is that one, matured by thirteen years or so. I doubt that I will revise the essays written since 2002 much. I'll work on the Dennis essays a little, too. Lots to do.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

The edits are beginning to come in, and one area where help is appreciated is organizationally. My style is unique, and while multidisciplinary and covering a lot of territory, organizing it better for the reader is often what the editing process of my writings covers, and my writings have understandably been called "rambling." One pal is reworking the final chapters, trying to extract my experiences from my visions and present them in separate chapters. That is a good idea. It has gotten me thinking about the essay's purpose and the ultimate course of action, and below are my initial thoughts on it.


As I think about the essay’s final chapters, and the problems with previous efforts and what has failed and what might succeed, here is the framework that I will be trying to get across (which is likely obvious, but it might help guide how those final chapters are organized):


1. While there have been many thousands of attempts to make technology that taps the zero-point field and other sources of energy currently not exploited (such as the environmental energy of Dennis’s heat pump (or even getting more energy out of a gallon of gasoline, as Mr. Mentor's engine did and Dennis's final efforts in the USA https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...rec#post694872)), few efforts have ever achieved any success, because:

a. The technical effort was underfunded, was often flawed in that it either did not achieve anything that could tap those sources in a significant way, or it succumbed to the vagaries that doom most business efforts (dishonest/greedy associates, inexperience, poor decision-making);

b. If the effort reached a certain level of promise, it was then targeted for organized suppression, which could originate from the local, state, national, or global levels, and many tactics of suppression have been used, from subtle sabotage to billion dollar bribes to seizure under national security laws to media smear campaigns to imprisonment on trumped-up charges to murder; the aspirants' inexperience and naïveté regarding the field of disruptive energy technology made those development and distribution efforts particularly susceptible to suppression efforts, which rarely needed to become overt or severe;

c. There was almost no awareness or support from the public at large, due to:

i. Their unawareness and indifference;

ii. Their manipulation by the social managers (media, law enforcement, educators, "experts," etc.);

iii. Their inability and unwillingness to understand the stakes of the situation, including both the potential of the new energy source and the peril of not acting, so they were easily distracted and led astray;

iv. Greed and fear were the greatest enemies of the public if they became involved, making them susceptible to manipulation;

2. In order to mount an effort that may have a chance of success, the effort needs these qualities:

a. It must be volunteer, non-profit, and transparent, to help prevent the disunities that self-seeking cause;

b. It must have the support of a large enough group that understands the stakes of the issue and is not easily susceptible to organized suppression;

c. The key understandings are far easier achieved if those supporting the effort have some scientific literacy, as well as familiarity with the role of energy in the human journey; they also need to develop something approaching a comprehensive perspective of the situation, so that they are not easily distracted and led astray.

Those attributes are far easier described than achieved, but my essay is about beginning to pursue them. With the essay's publication, the heavy lifting on my end will be finished, and it will be up to those who wish to support the effort to begin doing the work of raising their awareness. I do not kid myself: not many are going to have to the motivation to do so. But with the Internet's reach, those people can be as few as 1-in-100,000, and it will be more than enough for this to work. That is the entire point of what I am doing.

I merely carried Dennis's and Brian's spears, although Dennis says that I also threw a few; maybe so, but I was never the guy on center-stage, being targeted for murder attempts, being incarcerated, and run out of my home nation. It is because I was not surviving murder attempts, being imprisoned, and the like that I have been able to do this work.

I still plan to avoid the fates of people such as Dennis and Brian, and in order to do that, I need others to step up and help shoulder the load. My pals are doing it on the editing front, and those who join the choir will have a great deal of deep work ahead of them. As I am hearing in early returns, my work is not intimidating to the non-scientist, which was one of my primary goals all along.

We will see how it goes.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

I am currently re-editing my original energy racket essay:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy.htm

which will largely be superseded by the upcoming essay, and that essay was largely written in 2001 or 2002. I have done an immense amount of study of that subject matter since then, and as I edit it, I am not cringing. It was not too bad.

OK, anecdote time. In my previous post, which described the FE effort that might have a prayer, I mentioned an effort that was non-profit, transparent, and volunteer. I have many reasons for advocating that path, even though to people thinking in "normal" terms, it can seem like a hopeless approach. When I began working for Dennis in 1986:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#hitting

I got one paycheck before they stopped making payroll, but I still busted my tail until the company was stolen a few months later:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#salient1

In less than one year, I went from a stressed-out, unhappy yuppie in LA to a starving but happy revolutionary who chased Dennis out to Boston:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#chasing

But right after the company was stolen, I was getting down there on my funds, and a month later I had to move back in with my grandparents and save up enough money, working for $6 per hour as a temp, until I could chase after Dennis. When the company was stolen, there were about ten "loyalists" with Dennis, and the next day, Dennis talked to us at his home. We were all starving, going months without pay, and Dennis gave a beautiful talk about his vision for the future, but even I almost only had ears for the part where we were going to make money again. I know that kind of pressure all-too-well, and only somebody like Dennis can do what he does, and even people like me cannot ride with him for long.

That entire path, of "when do I make money doing this?" will not work for bringing FE to the world, I am sorry to report. In a normal situation, sure, but there is nothing "normal" about the pursuit of FE. Eliminating that kind of dynamic will go one hell of a long way to making the effort immune to the provocateurs and opportunists, and, believe me, any effort that gains any traction is swarmed by opportunists, Godzilla's minions, a gawking public, and the rest. Making it transparent and non-profit is going to be a key. The transparent part is about open-sourcing anything that is developed, and transparent also means financially transparent and no anonymity. All of those secrecy tactics are antithetical to what I am trying to do, which is why the choir will not have anonymous members in it. They have to reach at least that level of courage. It is really more of a minimum requirement, and if people cannot muster the courage to do that, they will not be able to handle the "curriculum" and future effort.

Back to editing,

Wade

[Luciano]

Hello Bill and Wade!

I would like to know what you guys think about the KESHE´S TECNOLOGY?


Regards

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Luciano:

See this:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post825669

Thanks,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

The last four chapters of my essay are going to be reorganized a little. My Fifth Epochal Event chapter looks like this at present.

Best,

Wade

Humanity’s Fifth Epochal Event: Free Energy and an Abundance-Based Political Economy

Many different technologies have been developed that attempted to tap the zero-point field, and devices made from rotating magnets seem to be the most common prototypes (the effect begins to appear at about 2,000 RPMs in properly constructed devices), but a solid-state device similar to what Sparky Sweet developed would be the likely “winner” in any FE device contest. There is some evidence that people can become ill if they remain near the energy field generated by those devices, but it also seems that either a way has been developed to shield the field within the device, or the devices have to operate a little ways from biological organisms, so they might have to be in a separate room in a home or compartment in a vehicle. That problem may also have been solved, and I will assume that it has been. The device I have in mind is solid-state, cheaply made, and produces, for all intents and purposes, as much energy as a person wants.

Sparky Sweet’s device also produced antigravity effects, and the electrogravity technologies for which the research went black in the 1950s needed vast amounts of energy to operate. FE and antigravity are interrelated, and the vision presented in this chapter will assume that those technologies are universally used by humanity. Also, I am aware, directly from event participants, that many exotic materials have also been developed and systematically suppressed. Flubber is not all that fictional. Also, innumerable technologies that would make almost all of today’s industries and professions immediately obsolete have been suppressed. For the following vision, I will assume that those technologies also made it into the public’s hands. What kind of world could appear if those technologies were in regular use by humanity?

The appearance of FE would be humanity’s Fifth Epochal Event, and by far the greatest of them all. Without further preamble, here is what a global political-economy based on FE could look like, as well as its impact on Earth and the solar system.

Immediate Material Changes

The immediate material changes would push both humanity and Earth's ecosystems back from the brink of destruction that they currently sit on, and this section explores some of those changes.

1. The immediate effect of FE technology would be the almost immediate cessation of combustion to generate energy, from wood to hydrocarbons. Burning organic material to generate energy would quickly become archaic and rarely done. Some applications may need a flame, and for such situations, burning hydrogen would seem ideal, as water is split to make it, and burning it results in water again. Burning hydrogen created by FE would have no environmental impact. That can also be taken further into exotic substances such as Brown’s Gas, which also created Low Energy Nuclear Reactions, and can remediate nuclear waste into harmless substances. The end of combustion, especially the kind that alters the atmosphere’s composition, would immediately end.

2. Burning fossil fuels causes most air pollution, including acid rain. Virtually all air pollution would immediately disappear. Global respiratory problems would largely cease, as would stress on trees and other plant life, which makes them susceptible to diseases and is killing off forests today and acidifying the oceans.

3. The 400 PPM of carbon dioxide in Earth’s atmosphere today could be reduced using FE-powered technologies, regaining preindustrial levels. That could easily be accomplished within a generation, and perhaps far more quickly. There are even mainstream organizations devoted today to that issue, but they usually need to burn fossil fuels to get the energy to extract carbon dioxide, which partly defeats the purpose. With FE, it would be technically easy to attain whatever atmospheric composition humanity desired, but since Earth’s ecosystems were adapted to less than 300 PPM before humans began their era of combustion, lowering it to preindustrial levels is probably best for today’s ecosphere. The same could be easily done for methane, artificial chemicals, and the like.

4. Humanity’s water-use practices are currently unsustainable, with water tables plunging worldwide, largely due to over-pumping for irrigation. It is creating widespread environmental devastation, including soil salination. With FE, intelligently implemented, environmentally harmless desalination plants could exist in the oceans, desalinating ocean water and pumping it to land. The most enlightened first use is filling back up the depleted water tables. The two biggest killers of children worldwide today are polluted water and air. Although the World Bank and IMF are behind privatizing the world’s water supplies, even in the United States, which has led to disease outbreaks already among the poor, desalinated water would also make universally free and pure water available to all humans.

5. Mining on Earth would largely disappear, and whatever continued would have no environmental impact. One large asteroid would provide enough metal to supply all of humanity’s needs for the near future. With FE and antigravity technologies, those asteroids would be easily mined and their results brought to Earth or used for colonies around the solar system.

6. Every use of wood today can be replaced with FE, and even the land used for forests would not be needed, and the forests can all grow back, even “farmed” by enlightened humans. The practice of using wood for energy, or any other use, would immediately vanish.

7. In 2007, it was calculated that humanity was harvesting Earth’s ecosystems at a rate of 150% of their productivity. In financial terms, that is called eating into the capital, not living on the interest. The most dramatic change that FE will have on Earth is that humans will no longer exploit ecosystems to survive and humanity can even live abundantly with no harm to Earth's ecosystems. At Japanese rice farmer levels of productivity, an American suburban yard could provide the food for the family that lives in the house. Imagine an indoor environment that can be as hot, cold, light, dark, wet, or dry as desired, and however much water and other nutrients were needed were freely available. Growing racks could be stacked three high or more, for example, with continual lighting, and food productivity under those conditions could reduce that food footprint to the “basement” of the spacious home sitting atop it. Would the family want to raise tropical fruits? Root crops? Seed crops? Fruit and nut trees? The septic system could be made to recycle the sewage into clean nutrients for crops. Water could be continually recycled, beginning each cycle with distilled-level purity. A completely self-contained family living system could be readily developed, and it would contain “luxuries” scarcely imaginable today. It could also be self-contained regarding its gases, constantly recycled. It is not much of a leap to quickly approach something like the replicators on Star Trek, where mass is continually being recycled, with energy added and the elements recombined in useful ways. The food-to-waste-to-food cycle is how our ecosystems operate, with the Sun’s energy adding the needed boost.

8. Oil spills, the environmental devastation of oil drilling and nuclear accidents, coal mining, deforestation, and other effects of humanity's energy-acquisition practices would immediately cease.

Cognitive and Social Changes

Just as with humanity's previous epochal events, the energy event, which was the epochal event, initiated great cognitive and social changes. As the level of energy production with FE would dwarf all previous levels, the cognitive and social changes would also be unprecedented and radical, and this section explores some of them.

1. FE would mean the end of economic desperation for all peoples for all time. The entire human journey has been about the acquisition, preservation, and consumption of energy, and the supply has always been scarce or finite, a paradigm has accompanied the human journey for the past 10,000 years or more, one I have called the Zero-Sum Game. It is the idea that the only way to improve one's station in life is by exploiting others. No other event could help shatter the illusion of scarcity and the Zero-Sum-Game paradigm better than FE. If people begin seeing beyond the Zero-Sum-Game blinders, vistas scarcely imagined today can be glimpsed.

2. Many concepts used today to describe economic and environmental reality will be superseded. One is called the carbon footprint, which is a result of burning hydrocarbons to get our energy. That will become immediately anachronistic and meaningless. There are similar “footprint” concepts, such as the footprint that humanity has on Earth’s ecosystems.

3. Economic motives have always been at the root of all wars, and Fuller noted the same motivation behind all soldiers. Even one of Hitler’s henchmen observed how any society can be motivated to war by fear, so why would wars break out when everybody lived in abundance? There are some legitimate transition fears, and I advocate a global peacekeeping force, ideally staffed with grandmothers, who would ensure that the transition to a world based on abundance was not marred by warfare. Today, the GCs can detect when anybody accesses the zero-point field, and weaponization of FE technology could probably be detected and just as easily disabled. I would happily deputize grandmothers to take the toys away from the boys who cannot seem to play nicely, until the utter stupidity of such behavior becomes universally obvious and nobody needs to be reminded anymore. I envision a solar-system-wide government forming, but its only charges would be safety, ensuring that everybody had life’s necessities, and promoting a dynamic unity among all peoples. It would be a government based on love and abundance, not fear and scarcity. That government will not be about amassing power, catering to economic elites, defending borders, and playing the adolescent games that we see on today’s world stage.

4. Today’s organized religions will all become obsolete, as the roots of religion were based in winning wars, and today’s religions are all priesthood-serving distortions of valid perceptions of spiritual masters. They have all waned in influence with industrialization, and when abundance reigns instead of scarcity, no enlightened ideas will be distorted into methods of social control and supporting economic rackets. There will be spiritual practices, but they will not rest on the violence-, fear-, and scarcity-based foundations of today’s religions.

5. There would not be punitive legal systems and prisons, but justice and healing would always be the goal. What today are called “criminals” would be recognized as sick people in need of help, not punishment. The most recalcitrant might be sequestered from society, but placed in environments of healing and education, not punishment. Criminal mentalities would not last long, either, nor could they be successfully hidden as they are today. The innumerable secret games being played today will largely vanish, and almost nobody would see the point of playing them. Abundance would make many behaviors called “human nature” today simply disappear.

6. The invader mentality would disappear from human consciousness as economic abundance was universally enjoyed by humanity. When the economic motivation for wars and exploitation becomes obsolete, humanity will achieve new levels of collective conscience, and invading environments of other life forms will quickly be seen as a great offense that only those with the most primitive mentalities engage in. If humans begin to explore Mars or Venus, for instance, and somebody else already lives there and may not welcome us, my hope is that the “settler” mentality of those earlier European migrants would be extinct, and that we would not intrude where we were not wanted. The short-term effect of making and distributing FE machines would be a global economic boom and redistribution of wealth of unprecedented proportion. While there would be short-term “losers,” the same awakening that would manifest the possibilities of FE can also bring to awareness the need to lessen the short-term discomfort of those relying on fossil fuel revenues. No human would need to suffer in the transition to a world economy based on FE.

7. As further discussed below, elites will become obsolete, as will ideas of rich, poor, and middle class. Elites appeared with civilization, and they will disappear with the arrival of FE, which is largely why they have been preventing FE's public dissemination.

8. The reasons for cities to appear were ease of communication and social interaction, and the surplus energy delivered from the hinterland to urban environments allowed for the specialization that led to professions. The energetic exploitation of a hinterland and low energy transportation lanes to deliver it made cities possible. With the ability to travel and communicate anywhere on Earth nearly instantly, and with the myriad problems of urban civilization, who would want to live cheek-by-jowl in cities? With the kinds of lifestyles made possible by those technologies, nobody I know would choose to live in a city. Urban environments would likely become obsolete, or the function of what remained would radically change. There will be social gatherings, perhaps large ones, and there might be something resembling factories, farms, offices, and the like, but there would not be any reason to cram them together, as energy scarcity underlies most urban features (low-energy transportation lanes, high-density dwellings at the end of those lanes). A modern city is essentially a huge, energy-concentrating device, where the energy efficiencies of centralized production, distribution, and consumption are critical features which become meaningless in an FE-based world.

9. With the appearance of FE and related technologies, all human needs would be easily met with almost no human effort. Think of the “workday” of an average adult being about an hour, to provide all of humanity’s necessities at a standard of living that makes Bill Gates appear a pauper. Just as the world’s richest man in 1700 lived a primitive life compared to the average American, in an FE-based economy, future generations will marvel that the world’s richest man in 2000 never even left his home planet, like some galactic bumpkin. Instead of riding hundreds of energy slaves, each human would ride thousands, hundreds of thousands, or even more. In our scarcity-based world, the idea of all humans having their basic needs met is decried as “socialism” and worse, but if all of humanity could almost effortlessly be fed, housed, and clothed, and transportation and communication were also easily accomplished, why would anybody be denied on the basis of someone else’s greed? That is the case today, with the games that the elites play, but this chapter is about imagining that that initial hurdle was cleared. All of the world’s nations, other than the USA, have long advocated that food, clothing, shelter, medical care, and education should be universal human rights. The only nation that officially vetoed that idea is history’s richest and most powerful. What is wrong with that picture?

10. The concept of nations will be among the first ideas to become obsolete, as will all such territorial ideologies. Other dramatic changes in humanity will happen that may not be obvious at first. Humanity’s races are the result of evolution, where geographic isolation and environmental adaption have led to incipient speciation, and hair, skin, and eye color are superficial changes. All human races can interbreed, and when geographic isolation ends with a humanity that can easily travel throughout the solar system, not only will racism end, but so will race. There will be only one race, probably within a few hundred years after FE appears, and racism is already under siege in nations such as the USA, and racism, along with all such “isms,” always had an economic rationale that elevated one group at the expense of others. All of those scarcity-based systems, judgments, and ideologies will quickly become senseless, just as so many others have during the course of human civilization. Just as the races are a product of geographic and genetic isolation that will disappear as the isolation does, humanity will likely use only one language. As with disappearing races, the process of languages disappearing will likely take centuries. Maybe something like Esperanto will rise again, or a lingua franca such as English will persist for a time (and computer-based language translation is increasingly common and sophisticated), but eventually one language will unify humanity. Science has been called a universal language, but the universal conversational language will likely resemble an English/Chinese blend or something similar. All human languages are UP’s languages, so that universal language will be easily learned by all. Maybe some “mother tongues” will survive, or a few languages will survive, with them being used for various disciplines (one being more scientific, while another is more social/mystical in nature, and so on), but I doubt they will survive for long.

11. Professions involved in exchange will all become pointless in a world of economic abundance, which include accountants, cashiers, lawyers, police, and soldiers. Entire industries, such as banking and insurance, will disappear. Politicians will largely cease to exist, especially those on today’s world stage, who are puppets of economic interests. Even seemingly worthwhile professions are largely rackets, such as Western medicine. With most people performing intrinsically worthless activities, what will happen when such professions and industries disappear? Will everybody just lie around, watch TV, and get fat? I doubt it. I do not have enough years in my lifetime to get my life list done. If people think about all the activities that are designed to relieve stress, cope with fear, and the like, many less-obvious activities will also fade to oblivion. In that world, which sources I respect have described in other star systems, time spent “working” is called “joy time,” as beings are fulfilled as they contribute to their civilizations in a meaningful way, they do it by using their particular talents, and there is no such thing as drudgery. Also, the idea of competition will likely vanish, as will the “entertainments” that enthrall so many today, such as sports, competitive games, beauty competitions, and the like. “Entertainment” with winners and losers will no longer be attractive, rooted as it is in ideas of scarcity, and celebrity culture and gossip will also be discarded. All such primitive behaviors and ideals will fade away, and they will not be missed.

12. Numbers and measurement will still exist, but egocentric economics that focuses on money and self-interest to the exclusion of all else will disappear, as will anthropocentric economics, where ecosystem health is only seen in terms of how it can support human welfare. The economic view that will supersede those frameworks is what I call life-centric or soul-centric, and it measures and values the wellbeing of all life on Earth, not just human welfare.

13. Humanity seems to be an intelligent, sentient species. Ending the Zero-Sum Game can also end the lives of quiet desperation that most people lead, and help open their hearts, which will also unleash the potential of their minds. Today, there is a system designed to purposely dumb people down, but if they begin waking up, those games will end. Human intelligence in the service of an awakened heart is a force that most people today cannot imagine; with the awakening that FE can catalyze, intelligence and imagination can be used as never before.

With the end of the Zero-Sum Game, people can also began thinking about how they can reduce the harm their existence causes others, which leads to the longer-term possibilities.

Longer-Term Changes

The rise of the human species was dependent on exploiting new energy sources by using intelligence and manipulative ability. The new paradigm can be catalyzed by FE (there is nothing else more likely to do it, or so close to becoming reality), and then intelligence and manipulative ability in the service of a healed heart can create a future that is difficult to imagine. Pondering the possibilities of FE since 1986 has led to many realizations for me, and this section is devoted to exploring some of the possibilities that could come to pass in my lifetime, if FE became publicly available.

1. Humans have been able to artificially reproduce manipulative ability and intelligence. Reproducing manipulative ability began with the era of machines, and the reproduction of intelligence began with the computer age. Both ages are still in their infancies. Most mainstream environmentalists have austere solutions to humanity’s energy issues, such as riding bicycles. FE can blast those austere blinders to shreds, and should. With love, intelligence and manipulative ability can rise to currently undreamed-of levels, and can begin approaching that heavenly future that can await most of us, if we want it. I am a believer in computers, especially their potential when wedded with machines. Popping the Zero-Sum-Game paradigm also will unleash amazing levels of genius that exist today, but are suppressed in the name of greed. Robotics is in its infancy, and developed to a high level in the above-top-secret world, and FE, machines, and intelligence can create marvels that today’s science-fiction authors can barely imagine. Today’s scientists are able to manipulate material at the atomic level as they make computer chips ever smaller and faster, while our energy production methods are not far removed from the cave days. That contrast is one of many mind-bogglers in today’s world, and could spur people to begin thinking about what is wrong with that picture; with the increase in robotics sophistication, no human need toil on behalf of another, unless that is what they want to do.

2. Another of humanity’s tasks would be cleaning up our mess beyond Earth’s atmosphere. A junkyard orbits Earth today, and we have even sent material beyond our solar system. In the equivalent of a month or year of effort by one well-equipped crew (I would eagerly volunteer for that duty), all junk in Earth’s orbit and scattered across our solar system would be cleaned up. The Apollo moon landing sites and other notable exploration sites might be preserved as museums, but nearly everything else would be cleaned up.

3. Cleaning up human space junk would only be the beginning, however. All asteroids in Earth-crossing orbits would be cleaned up (moved or mined), and if the technology does not already exist, it could readily be developed so that nothing larger than a pebble would be in Earth’s vicinity. Also, any comets arriving from the Kuiper belt would be immediately noticed and tracked, and anything on an Earth-crossing trajectory (and probably crossing any planet or moon), would be either redirected or mined. The idea of randomly appearing comets, or potentially threatening asteroids, could quickly become as obsolete as stone tools, as the solar system became “domesticated.” The asteroid belt and Kuiper belt have enough raw material to build space colonies that could easily host all of today’s humanity, and that is before we even think of settling or mining any other planets. It may be decided that the entire asteroid belt should be consolidated into one “planet” that can be mined for raw materials when needed. It would be less than a twentieth of our Moon’s mass.

4. With FE and antigravity technologies, those salubrious space colony ideas that Brian O'Leary and others advocated can be taken much further. For starters, there would be little practical limit on the size and speed of spaceships. The entire solar system would quickly become human civilization’s hinterland, and even the primary abode of space-living peoples.

5. For those who fear skies filled with colliding craft: that will not happen. The days of human-piloted craft are quickly coming to an end. By 2012, automobiles without drivers had logged a half million kilometers of driving the USA’s highways without incident, and self-driving cars being sold by the early 2020s are predicted. By the time that antigravity craft are made for public use, I would expect that they are all computer-piloted. When I have floated these ideas past people, some who even call themselves visionaries, the immediate reaction is almost always fearful, imagining all that could go wrong, before they even think about the benefits. That is a universal problem that I will address later.

6. Just as humanity can clean up its space junk, all of the insults that humans, particularly industrialized humans, have inflicted on Earth can also be remediated as among FE’s first applications. There are floating garbage patches in the world’s oceans, primarily comprised of plastic. That could be easily cleaned up, mostly with automated equipment, and is another temporary assignment that I would happily volunteer for. The entire concept of disposable plastics that enter the environment would be rethought and redesigned. All landfills, waste dumps, mine tailings, and the like would be recycled into their constituent elements or made harmless, and all of Earth’s environments would be restored. With FE and related technologies, those tasks would be easily completed.

7. With FE, a new paradigm of chemistry can appear. Most substances used to clean things, such as chlorine in the water supply, laundry detergent and other soaps, bleach and other household cleaners, can be replaced with hydrogen peroxide, oxygen, and ozone. Those three chemicals “deteriorate" into water and oxygen. They are infinitely recyclable and of zero environmental impact, and they are creatable in virtually infinite amounts with FE; a primary reason today’s toxic agents are used is that they are chemically persistent. Chlorine in the water will stay there, killing microorganisms, with FE, ozone could be continually created and put into water. The USA's government demanded that ozone purification replace chlorine purification, creating the same effect without the persistent poison in it. Even that is an intermediary vision (desalination distillation can leapfrog the whole issue). The basics of using hydrogen peroxide, oxygen and ozone is simply using FE to increase the electrons’ energy, and using it for cleaning purposes. Such a practice would introduce zero pollution and keep human environments spotlessly clean and non-toxic. There are new horizons of chemistry that await the awakening that FE can help catalyze, and go far beyond cleaning agents.

8. Industrialized peoples need to reconnect with nature, and a great beginning is to start having a hand in raising the food they eat, and raising it in their homes is one way. My ultimate eating experience has always been eating fruit off the tree and berries off the bush. Not only is it how we lived in the tropical forests, no food has ever tasted better or been better for us. The American food supply is degenerate on several levels, and locally grown fruit, harvested by those who eat it (or getting it the same day or week it was picked) can go a long way toward not only improving humanity’s health, but also reconnecting minds and spirits with nature, to begin seeing the world with healthy eyes and hearts. If land-farming becomes viewed as primitive, seen about as stone tools are today, and we can get all of our raw materials from around the solar system and easily manipulate them for our use, why would we ever again harm the fragile ecosystem that was our original home? Those kinds of practices would quickly be seen as primitive and born of desperation, and will be universally abandoned. Under an FE-based economy, eating animal flesh will likely be seen as unnecessary, primitive, and barbaric, and would soon end. Similarly, drugs and other inebriants are all brief escapes from misery, and when everybody’s standard of living leaps upward by a few orders of magnitude, the desire for inebriants will decline and likely vanish.

9. Forests are largely responsible for the existence of today’s land-based life. With FE and the materials revolution, the uses of wood for fuel and buildings would disappear. It would also disappear for furniture. Already, America is on the brink of eliminating paper for printing information. I rarely use my computer’s printer anymore, and read everything on my computer. Words can be on computer screens, LCD tablets that look like books; projected onto sunglasses, walls and even the retina. They can even be spoken aloud by voice generation; with just a little ingenuity, we could eliminate paper for information transmission. All plant fiber is simply water and air that photosynthesis turned into cellulose; all animal fibers such as wool are other transformations of sunlight. Already, synthetic fibers have eliminated much of the need for using cellulose and animal fiber; some organic fiber can still have some use, but could be provided by cotton or hemp, grown in those indoor environments; there could still be some use for wood, but it can be taken from newly dead trees, in environmentally harmless fashion. With the exotic materials that I am aware of in the GCs' Golden Hoard, I doubt that materials made from living organisms will ever be needed again, and would soon be seen as barbaric as slavery. Even toilet paper can be replaced by laser-guided warm water, perhaps with a little hydrogen peroxide or other sterilizing agent present (and a blow dryer!). That would not be much of a technical feat, in light of these other dynamics. In short, every use of wood, paper and organic fibers could become largely obsolete, and humans would not even need the land the forests stood on for their energy needs. Then forests could become what they used to be; homes for forest denizens and places for humans to recreate.

In summary, a world without environmental destruction and poverty would quickly come to pass with the most basic of technologies that I know exist. But what may challenge most of today’s minds are the many features of today’s civilization that will quickly become archaic, viewed as slavery and gladiator “games” are today.

A key aspect of civilization that will disappear with the release of those technologies is the same aspect that is suppressing them; with economic abundance, elites will become obsolete. Elites have always been economic elites above all else, and all elites for all time have engaged in conspicuous economic consumption as the mark of their status. Slavery appeared with civilization and disappeared with industrialization. Elites appeared with civilization and will disappear with the Fifth Epochal Event, which is why ultra-elites have worked so hard to prevent it. They see their very existence being at stake. For most “normal” people, that can seem a bizarre view, but ultra-elites are addicted to political power and their ability to rule an entire planet, and imposing fear and scarcity are their primary methods of maintaining their position. While each industrialized human rides hundreds of energy slaves, ultra-elites see themselves as riding billions of actual slaves. Many of them will not willingly relinquish their position, even if the planet is made uninhabitable as a consequence. Fortunately, even most ultra-elites realize the insanity of that position, and cooler heads may prevail. Instead of ruling in hell, elites will become regular members of something that resembles heaven on Earth.

Today, capitalist interests have turned industrial waste into “medicine” and concocted other Big Lies that the public has swallowed whole. Greed and other deadly sins have been turned into virtues in our crazed world. If abundance comes to pass, if a practice is discovered to be harmful, then it will be abandoned and a harmless method will be developed and implemented. What will not happen is that those “invested” in the harmful practice will brainwash the public, with compliant “scientists” who have sold their souls, to turn poison into medicine, call addictive junk food (that capitalizes on the evolutionary energetic adaptation to prefer sweet and fatty foods) nutritious, and the many other evil practices that parade today as beneficial or benign. Without huge capitalistic interest involved (the GCs are capitalism on steroids), which are only concerned with profit, those kinds of practices will end.

The human nuclear family was a change from ape social organization, giving more males an opportunity to procreate, but it is also an economic institution, as have been extended families and the like. Family and clan organization began to disappear with the first cities in Sumer. What will happen to family structures with FE and abundance? Bearing children is hard on a woman, and it is difficult to imagine a population explosion with FE and abundance, as women will have better things to do than become baby factories. Maybe the human population will significantly decline in a continuance of today’s demographic transition, but even if it rose, since humanity will not place a burden on Earth’s ecosystems, it would not matter like it does today.

Humans can radically alter the course of life on Earth, even more so than we already have. Artificial selection has proven to be far more powerful than natural selection, and with the human ability to alter its environment, natural selection itself could become largely irrelevant where humanity is concerned. I will return to this subject soon, but while those ideas can seem to encourage megalomania, it could also point the way to horizons that we can scarcely imagine, that do not have to become Blade Runner-ish nightmares.

As my fellow travelers and I have pursued FE, the nearly universal reactions to our efforts were denial and fear, which often led to us being attacked. Denial is a fear reaction, so we always found the barrier to be fear. If people got past denial and fear of “unexpected outcomes,” then greed usually destroyed the efforts. Greed is the fear of never having enough, so once again, fear defeated the effort. Those reactions usually happened long before organized suppression was applied. When the agents of organized suppression arrived, they almost effortlessly defeated the efforts by using people’s fear and greed against them. When I saw it happen the first few times, I initially refused to believe it. We made the GCs’ task easy. They easily turned my own mother against me. The opposite of fear is love, which has always been the crux of this conundrum and will be addressed later. This chapter is about what life looks like after we get over the hump; I honor some fears, but they can be addressed.

Darwin began his Origin of the Species with describing the evolutionary effects of domestication. Humans have already created unprecedented evolutionary trends, and a prominent speculation among scientists is that humans have domesticated themselves and genes for the bellicosity of warfare, for instance, may be getting culled from the human gene pool. With industrialization, violence has been proportionally diminished, and may be on its way to dying out. The entire dominance model of human relations will likely become a relic of our primitive heritage.

During the history of life on Earth and the human journey, there were many golden ages, where energy was relatively abundant, whether it was new ecological niches with few competitors (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14), “virgin” continents awaiting the “settlers,” (1, 2, 3), or the early days of exploiting a new energy source (1, 2, 3, 4), but the good times ended as others arrived to take their share of the energy or the energy source was depleted. If there is more potential energy in one cubic centimeter of “empty” space than scientists think exists in the entire visible universe, when do you think that energy will run out? For all practical human purposes, the energy would be inexhaustible. Michio Kaku has popularized the idea of galactic civilizations ranked on levels of energy usage, and under that scale, humanity has not yet reached the first level. An FE-based civilization would probably rank as a Type 1. I am not too interested in humanity becoming a Type 2 or Type 3 civilization, and maybe none exist in our universe. Those can seem like rather pompous ideas to today’s humans. Taking care of our own planet and fellow creatures is enough challenge for our species for the foreseeable future. I would happily settle for humans just learning those lessons for the next million years or so, before embarking on anything more ambitious. Humanity is not yet toilet-trained as a species, and reaching that galactically modest level is what the work of FE activists I respect has generally been devoted toward. Anything beyond that will be a bonus and far into the future.

There is a great deal of evidence, nearly all of it suppressed, that we are not alone in the universe. It is being suppressed for the same reason that FE, antigravity, and myriad other technologies are being suppressed: so that the ultra-elites can continue sitting upon their perch atop the global food chain. The issues are deeply related, and either situation overcoming the organized suppression will likely resolve the other almost instantaneously, and they might happen at the same moment. Although the Brookings Institute advised NASA for caution regarding any ET disclosures, the days of a War of the Worlds reaction are long gone. Knowing that we are not alone in the universe, and that our journey may have been significantly influenced by ET visitors (such as the velocity of today’s technological revolution), will change humanity’s self-image and likely the way that we end up interacting with galactic civilizations, but that will all pale beside the economic and social changes that FE, antigravity, and related technologies will initiate. That is all unexplored territory that I, for one, look forward to wandering.

All of today’s dominant ideologies will become obsolete in a world where abundance reigns, and all abundance notions have to be based on energy abundance above all else. If energy is not abundant, none of the abundance ideas put forth by various visionaries have much hope of coming to fruition.

The ideas presented in this chapter can be seen as vague ideas, if the Fifth Epochal Event happens. I can no more predict the specific outcomes of the Fifth Epochal Event than that English peasant of 1500 could predict the end of slavery, the invention of the Internet, the demographic transition, the liberation of women, Hollywood, nuclear weapons, or rockets to the moon.

However, for this Epochal Event, unlike the others, we actually have some hints of what might lie ahead, and Star Trek provides one such vision of a potential future. One set of noteworthy visions comes from Michael Roads's Into a Timeless Realm, which is particularly inspiring. Roads visited two future human realities, about 300 years into our future. They were on opposite ends of the fear/love spectrum. Both were technologically advanced compared to today and both had genetic engineering, but the fear-dominated reality made Blade Runner’s Los Angeles seem like Disneyland, while a Disney movie could not begin to depict the love-based one. Visions like that make it clear to me that our future will be what we make it. What we choose to do, today, determines what our tomorrow looks like. The fear-based world was filled with victims, from top to bottom, while those in that other world all acted like true creators, and creators create with love. Love has always been the answer, and learning that lesson may be the reason why we are here, playing this life-on-Earth game.

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

As I have been playing the editing game, interacting with my pals, and hearing from new players to my game, I find myself reflecting on what I am doing and what my goals are. A healed planet and humanity is my ultimate goal, and FE has always been the ingredient that trumps all else. Scientists not in denial of FE (there are some! ) understand this quite well, and I have found that scientists usually like my work more than any other group that I have encountered. I think it probably has to do with the attention span that doing science and digesting my work takes.

This year marks the 40th anniversary of the beginning of my energy journey, and I know that manifesting the biggest event in the human journey will be a long, slow process, at least on the scale of an individual lifetime. On the geologic timescale, it is happening in the blink of an eye. I find myself resisting attempts by people trying to popularize my work. While it is available to anybody, it is designed for deep thinkers, and there are not many of those in today's world on the FE issue, where the flavor of the day, the inventor of the hour, and the like dominates this subject matter.

I probably cannot escape continually reliving my days with Dennis, and not because I want to, but because I keep doing this work, and it constantly comes up. People really have to see Dennis in action to believe it. He is a combination of Indiana Jones, P.T. Barnum, a revivalist minister, and a business Einstein, all wrapped up in one. When I saw him last year, his wife and I whiled away the afternoon until Dennis got home from work, and Dennis was 67 at the time. She was amazed at how much energy he still has (she told it to me along the lines of, "You may be expecting that all that Dennis has been through finally took its toll, but he is still going as hard as ever, and I do not know how he does it, either."). He really is one of the wonders of the world.

The first interview I gave was in 2003, and I have kept in touch with the interviewer, who traveled the world for many years, seeking visionaries. I once asked him what they all had in common, and he said high intelligence and high energy, with their hearts being in the right place a given.

When a true visionary comes into contact with FE, everything else pales to insignificance, and their universal initial reaction is to see the Fifth Epochal Event laid out before them, and they want to tell others about it. I am not sure that I have seen somebody who began to understand not do that. But, in every instance that I am aware of, when they tried to spread the idea, they were humored, ignored, attacked, ridiculed, ostracized, and the like. That just comes with the territory. Brian's question, after playing the Paul Revere of FE for five years, of whether humanity is really a sentient species:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#sentience

is a classic reaction to trying to spread the news, and I hear from FE newbies all the time, after they tried spreading the news. If they really understand the FE message as presented by people like Brian and me, they will come to realize that they are all alone in the daily lives, with nobody else interested. It is a lonely feeling, I can tell you. And that is if they are fortunate. I have seen plenty of reactions where people lost friendships, family relationships, and even careers as they tried spreading the good news. Anymore, I usually dissuade readers from turning on their pals to my work. Or if they do, they should just send them a link and then stand back. If they do not see recognition and deeper probing of my work, they should just leave them be. Pressing my kind of work on people is when their reactions can get violent, as their defense mechanisms kick in.

As I have laid out the changes that the other epochal events created in the human journey:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post827022

it was clear that nobody could have predicted what was coming. The resistance to the idea of FE and abundance is a similar dynamic. The vast majority of humanity will not begin to understand until FE is delivered to their homes, and that is OK. I am looking for less than 1-in-1,000 in the general population, and it is likely more like 1-in-10,000, but that is a hundred times as many as I will need to make this work.

Seth once said that combined intention by people in full awareness, acting as sovereign individuals, is the most powerful force of change on Earth, and I believe it. That is what I am shooting for, and for people to reach the level of awareness that will be needed for making an FE choir happen, they will have to do the work, and that takes a long time. Getting into the saddle with somebody like Dennis is a good way to learn it fast, but almost nobody survives those lessons. If somebody has had an awakening experience, where work like mine begins to make sense to them, I estimate that it would take several years of study and reflection for it to really sink in. Shifting one's internal paradigm from scarcity to abundance, from fear to love, is not easy on today's Earth. Trying to live it is the hard part, but just being able to imagine it is also very hard, and those who join the choir will have made that transition in their minds. That is far, far harder than it might seem. Heck, I am constantly having to be vigilant myself, noticing where scarcity has lodged itself in my awareness and dealing with it. I doubt that the vigilance ever ends, at least in the epoch of scarcity.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

This process is bringing me into contact with some interesting people, and some are highly accomplished. For better or worse, I am definitely hearing that there is nobody else on Earth today doing what I am. While that might feel "nice," it is also part of that lonely feeling, and it puts pressure on me to do my best to get this right. I am currently feeling very happy that I have been able to get this done on my own terms. It has not been easy, as plenty of slings and arrows came my way as I was writing it, but the end is in sight, and it will get done in a way that is close to how I envisioned it. I could not ask for more.

I'll say this: so many of the adventures in my life were not planned, but just happened, often enough with that voice in my head leading me along, and other preposterous events. While the essay has likely been gestating ever since 2003, when I encountered Bucky's work:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/roots.htm#fuller

the path to writing the essay was anything but straight, and joining Avalon, in retrospect, was a key catalyst to doing it. Thanks to the forum for all the fun and games for the past few years. Bill gets big points.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

I have been editing like a madman, and the last several chapters of the essay received a pretty major reorganization that is almost finished. Essentially, I took my experiences, and those of Dennis, Brian, Greer, and other fellow travelers, and put them into a new chapter that immediately precedes the Fifth Epochal Event chapter. That new chapter looks like this. I will also present what the final chapter looks like before long, maybe this weekend.

Best,

Wade

My Adventures and Those of My Fellow Travelers

In this essay’s first chapter, I reviewed my journey and touched on Dennis Lee’s, who was my partner during my days of pursuing FE, and that chapter also mentioned Brian O’Leary’s amazing explorations. This chapter will dig a little deeper into our experiences. Our odysseys into alternative and eventually free energy all began at about the same time: in 1973-1974, during the USA’s first energy crisis, which ended the USA's poswar boom. Mine started when my first professional mentor invented what was hailed as the world’s best engine for powering an automobile, which he invented just before the crisis, and which caused great commotion within the federal government. During the furor, I had my mystical awakening, spent two months in Europe absorbing its art and culture, and began dreaming of changing the energy industry. Dennis is twelve years older than me, and as I was dreaming of changing the energy industry, he was having his first company destroyed in the energy crisis's mayhem. Brian began his alternative energy pursuit around the same time, as he engaged in Capitol Hill activism and advised presidential candidates.

Dennis was raised as a poor rural white of Scots-Irish heritage, growing up as a migrant farm worker, when white people still did that in the USA. He left home at age 13 because his family could no longer afford to feed him, and his journey took him to Vietnam in 1968, as a medic who saw combat. Not long after his Vietnam experience, Dennis had his mystical awakening in an event far more dramatic than mine, when he heard a voice in his head that he calls “God.” Several years later, as I had my first existential crisis and prayed for guidance, I too heard a voice, which changed my studies from science to business. Several years after that, I prayed for guidance for the second and so far last time in my life. The voice again responded and suggested that I move far away, and I immediately landed in the midst of Dennis’s company. I heard from that voice one more time, that time unbidden, and do not want to hear from it anymore. I have no idea who or what the voice was, but it had an omniscience that I sure do not possess. Even though I have not asked for that voice again and have not heard it, while I wrote this essay, I can tell that my “friends” have been orchestrating my life’s events once again. Such events are not uniformly unpleasant, but they usually challenge me in uncomfortable ways which seem to come with the territory. While I have never heard of any other FE attempts having such preposterous levels of otherworldly “intervention,” efforts like ours have often been accompanied by similar incidents. We all lose any beliefs that we might have had in coincidence.

All of those hard-to-believe events aside, I became a student of genius, learning at my first professional mentor’s knee. While it was the great integrity that Dennis displayed as his Seattle company was being destroyed that sold me on him (as well as that voice leading me to him), when I chased him to Boston to help rebuild his effort, it quickly became evident that I was learning from another world-class genius, and I avidly studied his efforts. He probably did his most interesting work before I met him. He invented the energy industry’s first shared savings program, and his marketing programs were awe-inspiring. Dennis was an untrained businessman, but his ability to erect a disruptive energy technology company with no capital and create the entire process, from developing the technology to building it, marketing it, and installing it, is the best that I have ever seen or heard of, and his public image rarely even touched upon his unparalleled talent in that area. Yet those abilities paled beside his other qualifications, which nobody else that I know of has matched. That voice knew what it was doing in leading me to Dennis, but being Indiana Jones’s sidekick was not an easy ride, and I have generally rejected Dennis’s entreaties to rejoin him after I helped free him from jail. Even as I write this, our story seems ridiculously fanciful, but it all happened and more, with connections and events I am not at liberty to publicly disclose that makes Indiana Jones’s journey resemble Walter Mitty’s. As dramatic as those events were, our focus was always on bringing FE to the world.

In Boston, we were still recovering from our Seattle effort when we were offered $10 million for Dennis’s initial idea for making FE. Although Dennis began awakening to the energy industry’s reality before I met him, when we received that first offer to buy us out, neither of us seriously suspected that it was an entreaty from those who run the world. A year later, just before we were wiped out, Dennis received an offer of about $1 billion to fold our operation, delivered by a CIA man who said that he represented “European interests.” It became obvious that we had attracted the attention of the people who ran the world, although the group has apparently split along factional lines, with us hearing from the "good guys" periodically. Soon after Dennis rejected the offer, our nightmare truly began, as we were taken out in one of the most spectacular snuff jobs in the entire history of FE attempts. When the dust settled a couple of years later, my life was shattered, I was radicalized, and I would never again see the world the same way. My partner who helped me free Dennis from jail had his life wrecked and shortened. The carnage spread far and wide, with distantly peripheral players having their lives wrecked, and heard sad stories from participants even as I was wrote this essay.

To trip the light fantastic, back in those days, members of that disenchanted ultra-elite faction gave a close friend a demonstration of some of their hoarded technologies. However, the dark heart of that organization is as black as a moonless midnight in the mountains, and in my circles it is known that one crazed ultra-elite contingency plan is terraforming Mars if Earth’s surface becomes uninhabitable. Sanity may prevail, but I will not idly hope for the best.

When Dennis and I began our FE efforts, we were ignorant of many aspects of how the world really worked or important precedents to our efforts. Probably neither of us had even heard of Nikola Tesla and really did not know that there was an FE field, but we began hearing about it soon enough, as people approached us with hair-raising tales of woe. Their stories were not only about FE, but any technologies that various oligarchies believed threatened their rackets, from high-MPG cars to windmill farms to innovate mining techniques to even low-water toilets. We heard of FE inventors having their entire families murdered, with their homes burned down and bulldozed, inventors thrown in jail on the flimsiest pretexts and many other outrages, primarily occurring in the USA, the Land of the Free. It began to become monotonous.

As Dennis and I were receiving a harsh education in how the world really works, Brian was exploring the frontiers of science. When Brian taught at Princeton, he was a leading voice regarding asteroid mining and space colonization. The reasons for that pursuit were several. The first was that if asteroids were mined, the energy spent to overcome Earth’s gravity would not be needed, so refining asteroids into their constituent elements (largely iron) would be far cheaper, energetically, than mining them on Earth and rocketing them into space. The second was that mining asteroids would not cause any of the environmental devastation that mining on Earth causes. The third was that new environments for humans would be created that would not disturb Earth’s beleaguered ecosystems. Brian’s work was some of the first on a practical, space-based Utopia. He was ahead of his time in many ways.

After his establishment days ended, Brian not only investigated FE technologies, but began probing the UFO phenomenon and subsequently nearly lost his life at the hands of the USA’s military. Like us, Brian began waking up fast. The year after leaving my home town, where my life was wrecked, I met Brian while he was traveling the world, investigating FE efforts, which resulted in his Miracle in the Void, published in late 1995. I became attracted to Brian’s work when I read, for the first time that I could recall, somebody in the FE field writing about Dennis without lying about him. Brian then embarked on a journey of playing the Paul Revere of FE, and for five years he rode, and he access to the highest levels of the world's scientific, environmental, and related institutions. Brian beseeched his peers to simply entertain the idea of FE.

I eventually carried Brian's spears, and they were fortunately much lighter than Dennis’s. In 2001, as we were being run out of town when trying to interest California's governor in alternative energy, as Enron was raping California, which caused the governor to lose his job, Brian told me how his ride as Paul Revere went: he openly wondered if humanity was a sentient species, as all he received were crazed reactions of denial and fear. I sadly understood his query. It was a fair question, and forms the crux of the FE conundrum. During that same conversation, when I told Brian about that exotic technology show that my close friend received, his response was nearly, “So, what else is new?” Few fellow travelers played at our level (not many survive for long in those environments), but when we encountered them and traded notes, they all described similar terrain. Everybody that I most respected in the FE and related milieus began their journeys as overgrown Boy Scouts, not rebels.

While the media had libeled Dennis since I met him, what initially shocked me as I became aware of the FE field was that leading voices in the FE field also libeled Dennis. They were not little white lies, but Big Lies that served as centerpieces of their attacks. When the libelers were confronted with their lies, sometimes by me, they either gave the challengers the finger or made up more lies. I also watched big names in the field eagerly embrace the libelers and their lies while they attacked Dennis and Brian. They essentially acted like the psychopaths on the GCs’ payroll who were sicced on us over the years. Those behaviors only reinforced the primary lesson of my journey, and provided more evidence that the enemy is us. Probably more disconcerting was FE enthusiasts presenting me one libel tract in particular as an example of great writing about the FE issue (!). That libel tract has been presented to me around twenty times.

I always respected Dennis and Brian the most in the FE field, and I valued their integrity above all else. Their great hearts attracted me to them, not their talent, genius, or fame. I have written plenty about my days with Dennis and Brian, and interested readers can discover more if they wish. I hope to convey what the learning experience of carrying their spears was like. My learning curve with Dennis was insanely steep and comprised the kind of education that few survive for long. While my education with Brian was far gentler, I learned important lessons from him. If not for my adventures, I would likely not have much worth saying. Even though much of this essay “merely” deals with mainstream science theory and data, my radicalized perspective was responsible for how I approached the issues. This essay is obviously not the work of a professional scientist or economist.

My adventures after the 1980s were milder, even though I risked prison again with Dennis, but I have had too much adventure and I am trying to live a fairly quiet life. As I stepped back periodically, during the quiet times, I reflected on our experiences and what our fellow travelers reported, and my views gradually changed. My initial orientation was the inventor’s approach, and that I got it the same year as my mystical awakening was likely significant for evolving my current perspective. That voice suggested that I study business, and I began developing the businessman’s perspective long before I met Dennis. My years with Dennis were about trying to make those teenage dreams a reality. I soon realized that my first mentor’s attitude misled me about inventors in general. Nearly all inventors invent to get rich and famous, not to help the world. I never met an altruistic inventor. I soon saw many unethical and criminal acts engaged in by Dennis’s “allies.” When I told Dennis how shocking it was to see, he told me to join the club.

Witnessing the orgies of fear and greed that Dennis’s associates regularly engaged in was a critical aspect of my awakening process, but what may have been more “fascinating” was how easily the GCs’ agents played Dennis’s associates like musical instruments, as they used everybody’s fear and greed to push the effort into self-destruction, and those “instruments” they so effortlessly played included people far older and supposedly worldlier than me. Bill the BPA Hit Man was definitely a professional provocateur, Mr. Texas was almost certainly one, and Mr. Deputy was also one. People like them rarely know exactly whom they really work for, nor do they care, as long as they are handsomely compensated. I had difficultly believing that “smart” people could be manipulated the way that I saw the GCs’ agents play them, but I soon understood that I was witnessing them surpass the limits of their integrity more than I was watching naïveté at work. Those affable and talented psychopaths on the GCs’ payroll usually played a fake angel game to get “allies” to betray us, and it regularly worked. After several years of observing such events, seeing people that I had known for nearly my entire life acting dishonorably, naïvely, cowardly, and even criminally, I learned my journey’s primary lesson: personal integrity is the world’s scarcest commodity. The reason why we do not have FE and a healed planet today is because of the general population’s low integrity. I resisted that lesson every step of the way, until I had it beaten into my head in no uncertain terms. Today’s situation has little to do with the GCs and their minions. Almost nobody wants to hear that sobering truth, however, which is also part of the problem. Denial of how the world really works will not help for manifesting FE and a healed planet and humanity. The enemy is us, and always has been.

I watched Dennis try every approach that he could think of, from businesses to non-profits to the “patriot” approach and more. Dennis is a literalist Christian and has tried the religion route several times, which always ended in disaster, along with every other approach, and his self-professed religious fanaticism understandably dissuaded many from becoming involved with our efforts. I was always with Dennis in spite of his religious views, not because of them. All FE aspirants that I knew of had personal idiosyncrasies and foibles, including me, which comes with being human. Brian readily admitted that his astronaut and “bright lights” days tended to inflate his ego, and he had his Lapis Pig and Einsteinian hair, while the Disclosure Project’s founder took the über-warrior approach after his team was killed off soon after those Congressional hearings. I am a reclusive semi-nerd (hermit archetype) who can become overemotional. We are/were all citizens of history’s most arrogant nation and were all geniuses, which presented all of us with challenges in humility. I have watched FE aspirants disappear down the mystical rabbit hole and fall into the many pitfalls that await the newcomer. A week before I finished drafting this essay, a relatively new FE hopeful claimed that he was the Messiah, and he was not the first one to do that. The perfect candidate to lead an FE effort likely does not exist, but personal integrity is the quality that I value above all others. If a person does not have a sufficient store of it to begin with, the rest will not matter. The FE pursuit by people of low integrity does not have a prayer of success for navigating the innumerable perils and temptations that await. There are far more pretenders than contenders in the field, and the hazards of the FE pursuit are too overwhelming for most people to navigate for more than a few minutes.

When I first dreamed of changing the energy industry when I was sixteen, I imagined that not everybody would welcome a change in humanity’s energy paradigm. I clearly recall thinking that the resistance would come from foreign interests in tropical locales. I was probably influenced by the propaganda surrounding the USA’s invasion of Southeast Asia. Little did I suspect that the interests most hostile to changing humanity’s energy paradigm lived in the West. After my life was wrecked, I staggered from my home town, knowing that whatever I had been taught about how the world really worked was likely false, and I began seeking alternative sources of information. My first alternative influences on that subject were the work of Noam Chomsky, Ralph McGehee, Ed Herman, Howard Zinn, and others like them. After years of studying their work in my radicalized state, I came to realize that the West’s interaction with the developing world likely had little benevolent intent behind it, and the situation lasts to this day. If I had not already been radicalized, I wonder how receptive I would have been to their message. Those men were all among my most gracious correspondents, and I learned more from their collective efforts than I did from any other body of work.

The training that enabled remote viewings and other psychic feats ruined many scientific careers, as scientists received direct personal experience that the materialistic paradigm that guides mainstream science is false. Brian and I had our first remote viewing experiences performing the same exercise in the 1970s. I performed experiments regarding the human ability to generate a subtle energy that prevents rotting, and was able to generate great heat with my hands, which others have developed to far higher levels of mastery. Brian performed similar experiments and advocated a scientific approach to investigating such phenomena. Nearly all of my fellow travelers in the FE field had some kind of experience like that in their late teens or early twenties. Most were scientists or scientists-in-training. When people have experiences such as those, they will never accept the materialistic assumptions that dominate mainstream science. The giants of physics, that hardest of the hard sciences, fully realized the orthodox framework’s limitations and all held “heretical” ideas that could be called mystical. Many organizations have sought to remedy the affliction of mainstream science that views consciousness as a mere epiphenomenon of brain activity. I met Brian at a conference for one such organization. It has been called bridging the gap between science and religion, and other terms. I see it as bringing science and consciousness together. Brian was a speaker at that conference, and his talk’s subject was the need for a new science. Until mainstream science allows consciousness into its paradigm and rejects its materialistic assumptions, it will be playing a small game, as the greatest science of all may be the science of consciousness.

Because the subject needs to be addressed and I have been involved with it, I will describe what I am aware of regarding the UFO and extraterrestrial (“ET”) issue. In the early 1990s, an emergency room doctor, Steven Greer, mounted an effort called the Disclosure Project to inform the public about the UFO/ET issue, and Brian was prominently involved. After years of briefing officials from many institutions, including the Vatican, United Nations, White House, Pentagon, and the USA’s Congress (and he never received a scoffing or disbelieving reaction), secret congressional hearings were held so that witnesses could testify (and key Disclosure Project members developed strange and fatal cancer cases immediately afterward). Ed Mitchell, who walked on the Moon, co-chaired the hearings and has been quite vocal about the ET presence. One Disclosure Project witness was one of the first astronauts, and other astronauts have described their experiences, at least of those who could talk publicly about them. I am aware of recent astronaut close encounters that have been classified. Brian had no doubt that his brush with death and the UFO-research “offer” were related.

When I began hearing Disclosure Project witness testimony, some exotic technologies they described were nearly exactly what my friend was shown, which I heard about several years before I heard the witnesses describing them. I have numerous connections to the issue, some of which involve highly public figures but, to me, the important issue is why there is a cover-up. Eisenhower was the last American president really in the loop on the UFO issue. John Kennedy was briefed on it, but the situation had largely been privatized by that time. Jimmy Carter had a famous confrontation with the Director of Central Intelligence soon after becoming president, where Carter asked for the CIA’s files on UFOs and was rebuffed. The CIA’s Director of Central Intelligence was George Bush the First, whom Carter fired soon after Bush rejected his request. I have also heard credible stories that Carter was threatened into silence. The most prominent NASA-Nazi was Wernher von Braun, who was largely responsible for NASA hiring Brian; he was picked with von Braun’s long-dreamed mission to Mars in mind. Dr. von Braun told his spokesperson in his last years that ETs would be portrayed as the ultimate terrorist threat used to form a one-world dictatorship so that humanity could huddle under its “protection,” and that the “threat” would be a fabrication created by the GCs, as ETs generally do not have hostile intent. As an example of anecdotes from those close to me, one friend was close to Allen Hynek’s family, and was told that Hynek’s transformation was indeed how it has been popularly presented, in that Hynek first approached the issue as a disbeliever and debunker, to eventually become convinced by the evidence that UFOs were a real phenomenon. In my circles are many who have experienced sightings and close encounters, and few, if any, would be considered members of the tinfoil-hat crowd. Stories of electrogravitic research going “black” in the 1950s also align with my understanding of the issue.

There is also a three-ring circus of disinformation around the UFO/ET issue, purveyed by numerous parties for various agendas, including the world’s national security states, especially the USA’s. I take most “insider” revelations with a grain of salt unless they are well-documented, as the “inside” generates a great deal of disinformation, attention-seekers pretend to be insiders, and other distractions. In the milieu are also hyperventilating conspiracists and stalwart establishment defenders, and many such defenders are naïve, dishonest, or both. Serious and often professional investigators are in the mix, as well as an easily misled public, among other parties to the pandemonium. Consequently, many do not seriously consider the situation, which is understandable. I went to see UFOs for myself, and was not disappointed. A similar situation surrounds the FE milieu. There seems to be a method to the madness, however, and the GCs have helped orchestrate the confusion, to their benefit. There are a few ways to try avoiding those minefields. One is to obtain direct personal experience with UFOs/ETs, another is to be close to key players in the field, and another is to spend a great deal of time digesting and testing the evidence. I have taken all three of those approaches, and all of the chaos aside, my perception in 2014 is that the reason for the UFO/ET cover-up has little or nothing to do with fear of a War of the Worlds reaction (which Eisenhower might have rightly feared in the 1950s, but most Americans today believe that we are not alone in the universe or are open to the idea), but to suppress exotic technologies that would end ultra-elite rule on Earth. Their rule would end for two reasons, the first of which is that FE and antigravity technologies would radically transform human civilization in ways that TV shows such as Star Trek partially depict, where humanity lived in true economic abundance for the first time. People living in scarcity are easily manipulated, but people living in abundance would not be. The second reason is that few humans would have much obedience to obviously corrupt Earth-based institutions, particularly draconian and violent ones, when it became accepted that humans are simply one of many sentient species in our galaxy and that we are not particularly advanced at all; we are more like cavemen than distinguished members of galactic society.

While knowledge that we are not alone in the universe will change humanity’s self-image, and NASA was warned about such a change, changing humanity’s economic and environmental situation is by far the most important upshot of the UFO/ET issue, which Greer also realizes; he has been involved with the FE issue for many years. He spoke at a conference that I helped organize and fund in 2004, where I learned from him about how large the GCs’ payoffs for silencing inventors have been, which was congruent with my experiences.

Almost none of us became “conspiracy theorists,” but we also knew that vastly more was happening on the global level than was publicly disclosed, and that the wildest conspiracy theories were sometimes close to the truth. We all understood that ultra-elites controlled the world economy and hence the retail political scene. That organization did not have a name that we knew of. I have called them the GCs, while others have used different monikers. As this essay will later discuss, the existence of that ultra-elite organization presents real and potentially fatal problems for anybody trying to develop free FE and antigravity technologies for public use. I also discovered that the public is its own worst enemy, and those hard lessons helped me develop my current strategy.

Antigravity technology, combined with FE, may be how some of our ET visitors have arrived, and is likely the primary reason behind the ET cover-up. With FE and antigravity technology, the Fifth Epochal Event definitely arrives, and the human journey will radically change. Ever since Tesla began building his tower, there have been many thousands of attempts to produce FE. Tesla’s tower was not initially intended to tap the zero-point field, but take advantage of the electric potential between Earth’s upper atmosphere and crust, and other technologies have accessed that potential energy. Some have tried to “defeat” the Second Law of Thermodynamics, as our efforts arguably attempted in the 1980s, which some scientists that I respected thought was possible. But the zero-point field is where the abundant and clean energy to initiate the Fifth Epochal Event will come from, and many have accessed it. When scientists and inventors have extracted energy from the zero-point field, they then received the GCs’ attention, and the suppression of such technologies has become a science during the past century. As this essay's final chapter explores, I became aware of many avenues that have been attempted, and all have been miserable failures, with the “lucky” aspirants receiving the “Golden Handcuffs” of being bought out, with their technology being either shelved or clandestinely developed. I am constantly made aware of the latest FE aspirants’ efforts, who are almost always an inventors with dreams of greed, delusions of grandeur, potentially fatal naïveté, or strange combinations of all three afflictions, and “supporters” who will quickly betray them to the highest bidder, and nobody’s pockets are as deep as the GCs’. This essay’s final chapter will discuss what has not worked and what I no longer have any interest in, and why my intended approach will be something different than anything tried before, as far as I know. To a great degree, I am standing on the shoulders of Fuller and my professional ancestors in the FE field, many of whom were genuinely well-intended but were understandably unaware of how the system really worked. They usually found out the hard way, as I did. Probably the primary reason why I am able to do this work is that I was a teenager when my energy dreams began and somehow survived my adventures so that by age 30 I was a grizzled veteran. When older FE aspirants had their adventures, for those who survived them, they were usually crippled by their traumas. I was young enough to survive my traumas, but I will always be recovering from them.

As already discussed, for the previous epochal events (1, 2, 3, 4), what the event led to was unimaginable to beings living before the event. But this time we have some hints, and shows such as Star Trek are likely not all that fictional, and my understanding is that a close cousin to its Prime Directive actually guides our ET visitors, and humans will not be allowed to become a space-faring species until we reach a level of maturity where ideas such as the Prime Directive become standard features of our culture. While the idea of becoming a space-faring culture has plenty to capture the imagination, Brian and I were always most interested in the environmental, economic, political, and social changes that a “free energy revolution” could initiate.

On Star Trek, replicators can make whatever element anybody wants. While that technology may also exist in the GCs’ treasure trove, I am not specifically aware of it. Almost all that I know and feel comfortable reporting regarding those hoarded technologies is what fellow travelers have described, usually by telling me directly. The next chapter will present a vision where manipulation on the nuclear level is not a regular practice, although I realize that it could well come to pass if it does not already exist, which would make that chapter’s vision potentially even more grand. Also, while I have heard rumors of time travel being another sequestered technology, and some have made public claims of their involvement in time-travel experiments, I have not had any close fellow travelers confirm that to me from their direct personal experience, so I will also lay aside that possibility in that chapter, although it would certainly be mind-blowing technology.

[Robert J. Niewiadomski]

Creation of matter (or rather making it dense) out of ZPF has been theoretically proven to be possible by White Science (in 1930s !):
NewScientist: Lasers could make virtual particles real

Posted by NewScientist on 17 August 2010
Next-generation lasers will have the power to create matter by capturing ghostly particles that, according to quantum mechanics, permeate seemingly empty space.

The uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics implies that space can never be truly empty. Instead, random fluctuations give birth to a seething cauldron of particles, such as electrons, and their antimatter counterparts, called positrons.

These so-called "virtual particles" normally annihilate one another too quickly for us to notice them. But physicists predicted in the 1930s that a very strong electric field would transform virtual particles into real ones that we can observe. The field pushes them in opposite directions because they have opposite electric charges, separating them so that they cannot destroy one another.

Lasers are ideally suited to this task because their light boasts strong electric fields. In 1997, physicists at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC) in Menlo Park, California, used laser light to create a few electron-positron pairs. Now, new calculations suggest next-generation lasers will be able to create such pairs by the millions.(...)

And actually it has been achieved By White Science and with help of present-day "primitive" equipement:
NewScientist: Light pulled out of empty space

Posted by NewScientist on 18 November 2011
YOU can get something from nothing - as long as you are moving close to the speed of light. The discovery confirms a 41-year-old prediction on how to pull energy from empty space and produce light.

The phenomenon relies on the long-established fact that empty space is not at all empty, but fizzing with particles that pop in and out of existence (see "Out of the ether: the changing face of the vacuum"). This is down to the laws of quantum mechanics, which say that even a vaccum cannot have exactly zero energy but must exhibit small fluctuations of energy. These fluctuations show themselves as pairs of short-lived particles.

The presence of these "virtual" particles, usually photons, has long been proved in experiments demonstrating the standard Casimir effect, in which two parallel mirrors set close together will feel a pull towards each other. This happens because the small space between the mirrors limits the number of virtual photons that can appear in this region. Since there are more photons outside this space, the radiation pressure on the mirrors from the outside is larger than the pressure between them, which pushes the mirrors together.(...)

So if White Science openly admits empty space is not empty at all. What are they waiting for one could ask?

Now, just imagine what Black Science is capable of thanks to it's "toys"...

[Limor Wolf]

Hi Robert ~

It seems that Mainstream science will be ready to admit to quantum Physics, positrons and particles that 'do not behave themselves' anytime nowdays, but will not relate or will go the extra mile to suggest in the direction of free energy and what it can do for us, even if only with the initial thoughts and the narrow possibility of the use of it (once a drop leaks out, the whole dam is breaking, a kind of a black or white scenario). Most everything under Mss, especially the formal institutions is very much calculated and purposeful. Scientific discoveries will be navigated in one direction - usually with relations to the use of 'exotic' technologies, but will continue to be suppressed completely if it contains any promise of liberty and freedom to the human race, that is still a big 'No, No'.

Changes in that direction will have to come with consciousness and awarness, not from main stream science

Many blessings ~

Limor

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Robert and Limor:

Yes, mainstream science is in a straightjacket on those issues, with "limited hangout" stuff like that appearing now and then:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limited_hangout

The breakthroughs will not come from white science.

Time for some chores, including a little hiking.

Best,

Wade

[Limor Wolf]

In the spirit of visioning, if you think about bringing a new baby to the world you might want to think about names in advance. Here are a few suggestion. No ownership, of course, but a tribal child rearing

FEvron
FEtroleum
RosenFEt
ConcoFE
FEtronas
FEmex
FErazier

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

The past day has been spent in heavy editing and reorganizing the last several chapters, and the last one looks like the below now.

Ah, Limor, I try to not make it catchy, and I did not invent with this in mind, but I would call it the FEEvent, and you can think of it as either the Fifth Epochal Event, or the Free Energy Event.

Best,

Wade

What Has Not Worked So Far and What Might - Part 1

Many thousands of attempts have been made to make energy technology that taps the zero-point field and other sources of energy currently not exploited (such as the environmental energy of Dennis’s heat pump (or even getting more energy out of a gallon of gasoline, as my mentor's engine did and Dennis's final efforts in the USA)), few efforts have ever achieved any success. After many years of being in the trenches, trading notes, and watching from afar, I noticed that these were the primary problems that all FE efforts suffered from:

1. The technical effort was underfunded, was often flawed in that it either did not achieve anything that could tap those sources in a significant way, or it succumbed to the vagaries that doom most business efforts (lack of integrity in the principle member, dishonest/greedy associates, inexperience, poor decision-making, delusions of grandeur, etc.);

2. If the effort reached a certain level of promise, it was then targeted for organized suppression, which could originate from the local, state, national, or global levels (always at the behest of private interest patrons), and many tactics of suppression have been used, from subtle sabotage to billion dollar bribes to seizure under national security laws to media smear campaigns to imprisonment on trumped-up charges to murder; the aspirants' inexperience and naïveté regarding the field of disruptive energy technology made those development and distribution efforts particularly susceptible to the suppression efforts, which rarely needed to become overt or severe;

3. There was almost no awareness or support from the public at large, due to:

a. The vast majority of humanity does not know anything about FE and does not want to know, with several levels of disinterest and denial, ranging from outright uncaring to sophisticated arguments for why FE is either impossible or dangerous;

b. Their manipulation by the social managers (media, law enforcement, educators, "experts," etc.);

c. Their inability and unwillingness to understand the stakes of the situation, including both the potential of the new energy source and the peril of not acting, partly due to their scientific illiteracy, so they were easily distracted and led astray;

4. For those with some idea of FE’s potential, there were numerous pitfalls in their perspectives that ended up harming FE efforts, which included:

a. Their ignorance of how the world’s political-economic dynamics really worked, from how markets are controlled to how political establishments work to how organized suppression works, at the local, state, national, and global levels;

b. Their naïveté of how their family, friends, and colleagues would react to the idea of FE and abundance;

c. Their inability to understand that scarcity-based ideologies were not aligned with manifesting a situation of abundance; those ideologies might work for most “activism,” but the perils and temptations of FE, as well as the organized suppression, have proven too formidable for those kinds of approaches;

d. They could not relinquish their self-serving orientation to the issue, and became seduced by greed, delusions of grandeur, and other ego-traps;

e. Their inability to understand the truly epochal nature of FE, which likely meant that only an epochal approach might work; the standard methods of the capitalistic, governmental, “philanthropic,” and environmental organizations would not work for developing and bringing FE to the world;

f. They would get stuck in today’s arrested development in the field, where it is focused on scientists, inventors, business opportunities, and retail politics, and various New Age aspects of it;

In order to mount an effort that may have a chance of success, the effort needs these qualities:

• It must be volunteer, non-profit, and transparent, to help prevent the disunities that self-seeking cause;

• It must have the support of a large enough group that understands the stakes of the issue and is not easily susceptible to organized suppression;

• The key understandings are far easier achieved if those supporting the effort have some scientific literacy, as well as familiarity with the role of energy in the human journey; they also need to develop something approaching a comprehensive perspective of the situation, so that they are not easily distracted and led astray.

Those attributes are far easier described than achieved, but my essay is about beginning to develop them, and the rest of this essay explores those issues in some depth. More than thirty years after I began dreaming of changing the energy industry, I published a framework to organize the thousands of reactions to the idea of FE that I have witnessed, and I will refer to it for the remainder of this essay. Several years after publishing that framework, I have yet to find a reaction that does not easily fit into that framework’s categories.

The first level of awareness of FE is no awareness at all. Dennis spoke on hundreds of talk radio shows in the early 1990s between his stints in jail and prison, mounted national ad campaigns, barnstormed the USA repeatedly, and engaged in many other activities. There have been several national TV shows about Dennis, but they were all smear campaigns, as nearly all media coverage was, often featuring a “skeptic” who made up lies about Dennis and concocted new lies when his old ones were exposed. Whether the attention was good or bad, many millions of Americans have at least heard of FE, in no small measure because of Dennis, but even the movie The Incredibles featured zero-point energy. It is safe to say that many Americans, maybe even more than half, have at least heard of FE in some way. Some have simply not heard of it, others would not care even if they heard of it, and even most people who heard of it probably regard it as a cartoon fantasy, and that is just how the GCs like it. Their goal is to keep as large a fraction of the population at that level of awareness as possible. If the herd is not even restless or has any idea in what direction freedom might lie, it is exceedingly easy to manage.

Then there is the population’s fraction that has heard of FE and consciously considered the idea as a real possibility, and by far the most common reaction is to use their ideologies of choice to quickly dismiss it. Resorting to dismissals rooted in nationalism, capitalism, and organized religion are the most common that I have seen, and are reflexive actions, where the idea leaves their awareness almost as fast as it arrived, similar to Orwell’s Memory Hole. Those who never heard of FE and those who immediately dismiss it with reflexive reactions comprise more than 99% of today’s global and Western population.

Some people are more thoughtful, who donate to seemingly worthy causes and genuinely care about what is happening in the world, at least enough to not reflexively dismiss FE. When they hear of FE, they may ask their scientist relatives and associates what they know about it, they might contact their favorite environmental organization, and the like. The reply almost invariably is that FE is “impossible” or would be used to destroy the planet through either warfare or environmental destruction, and they are advised to seek elsewhere for solutions to the world’s problems, and those seekers obediently drop the subject. They trust those authority figures, FE seemed all-too-fantastic anyway, and such people generally fall into the political liberal category. If they live in the West, and I know the USA best, they probably listen to NPR and watch PBS and the BBC, and follow the news on some “progressive” sites.

Those levels of awareness have either no knowledge or gain only a superficial understanding of the issues before succumbing to their conditioning and trusting various authorities. The next level of denial is the most intelligent one and includes recognized experts in their fields, and most scientists and academics have their FE awareness at that level, if they are aware at all. They are often those whom those thoughtful progressives asked for their opinion on FE. Their responses include invoking the “laws of physics” and other reasons why FE is “impossible,” and they irrationally dismiss evidence of organized suppression as a “conspiracy theory.” Many breakthroughs in science and technology were often called “impossible,” even after they were achieved, with the reception afforded the Wright brothers actually open-minded compared to the how the idea of FE is received today in such circles.

Brian tried interacting with those scientists and academics, and became extremely dismayed. I also tried for many years, and their naïveté and circular reasoning were probably the most frustrating aspects of their responses. When I approached one academic who at least mentioned FE as a possibility, and who cited situations that I had been involved with, his reaction was stunning. That group, as a whole, might be the last to accept FE’s reality, which is similar to what the Brookings Institute warned NASA about regarding the UFO/ET issue.

For those who at least admit that FE is possible, probably the most common response is that they want an FE device to power their home, or one to study in their laboratory. Who would not want a quadrillion dollar technology delivered to their home? Those were the equivalent of Dennis’s customers under his shared savings programs. Their “skin in the game” was waiting for a miraculous and world-changing technology to be delivered to them, preferably for free.

Perhaps the next most common reaction for those not denying that FE is possible is those who fear FE (they may outnumber those who will gladly accept FE delivered to their homes and labs). Their fears are usually stated to be around weaponizing FE or using it to destroy Earth’s remaining ecosystems. However, that reaction seemed to camouflage other, deeper fears. I have never succeeded in engaging such people in rational conversation regarding those fears. I eventually suspected that they really feared abundance and seemed addicted to scarcity. They built their entire lives around surviving in a world of scarcity, and saw abundance as a threat to their existence. Such reactions are like the GCs’, and for similar reasons. They know that the world as they know it will end with FE, they are afraid that their role in that new world will be diminished, and prefer the devil they know, and in some cases are that devil.

Those various reactions are not mutually exclusive, as some people will react with combinations of them, and the fear of FE is often espoused by those who have sophisticated objections to the idea of FE, with their reaction along the lines of: “FE is impossible, thankfully, because if we had it, we would only destroy ourselves and the planet with it.”

Those aforementioned categories encompass the reactions of more than 99.9% of humanity at this time. The next levels of my framework describe people actually trying to do something about the situation, and they all have my respect, even if their motivation may be to get rich and famous and other self-serving motivations, or they are naïve. Everybody that I respect in this field began their journeys naively. Naïveté is no crime, and I greatly respect people who lost their naïveté honestly, usually by trying to make the world a better place. However, naïveté is potentially fatal in this field, and I am attempting to mount an effort where naïveté will be less hazardous for its participants, although it still needs to be shed as soon as possible.

In the awareness level of people doing something or planning to, the beginner's perspective is thinking that the energy industry will welcome innovative technology and that organized suppression does not exist. This plays into the capitalist canard that the world is constantly seeking the better mousetrap. Some are looking, but not to bring them to market; to instead ensure that they never do. Wiping out the competition is the essence of capitalism. After having his companies stolen many times, surviving Mafia hit attempts (1, 2) and the like, Dennis still believed the electric companies’ propaganda in Washington State in the wake of the biggest municipal bond default in the USA's history to that time. He devoted great effort toward interesting the electric companies in the kind of energy conservation that their full-page ads stated that they desperately needed, thinking that he would get a tickertape parade. In the midst of trying to interest the electric companies, an anonymous party began wrecking Dennis’s business relationships, and just as he entered into a large deal with a finance company, the electric companies unmasked themselves and went public in their attacks on Dennis’s company. Among the many attacks that came simultaneously from Washington State’s power structure, a professional provocateur with fake alternative energy credentials infiltrated Dennis’s company and was subsequently responsible for the death of one of Dennis’s employees, which was Dennis’s radicalizing moment in his energy adventures.

Sparky Sweet, who had a scientific career at General Electric, also believed that the energy industry would welcome his solid-state FE device. He mailed working prototypes to the big energy institutions, expecting a tickertape parade. The opposite happened, with shadowy interests destroying his business deals, similar to Dennis’s experience. Sparky did not take the hint and kept trying, which led to death threats. After their final threats, Sparky fled into hiding, where Brian visited him, and Sparky died the next week of a “heart attack.” Dying that way has been common among FE contenders who played near Sparky’s level. Dennis, Sparky, and many others like them lost their naïveté the hard way, but the field has been filled with newcomers who deny the reality of organized suppression as they charge forward with visions of riches and fame. It is perhaps the most common level of awareness where FE newcomers will be found. Most never develop anything worth suppressing so will never know any differently, and will enter and leave the field with that beginner's level of awareness intact, which was once the most common one in the field. However, with enough people trying and either living to tell the tale or others chronicling their dire fates, which often included untimely deaths, and the Internet spreading information like never before, few FE newcomers have much excuse for being unaware of the fates of their professional ancestors.

The next level of awareness might be more dangerous than the previous one, where FE newcomers realize that there is organized suppression, but they think that they are clever enough, lucky enough, or have some other unique quality that will allow them to avoid the suppression, usually by playing secrecy games. One fellow traveler invented an FE prototype in a nuclear laboratory, fresh out of college, and was fired the next day. He then tried the “sneak past them” approach, to be rudely disabused of his idea. Years later, he talked to fellow travelers and began understanding the magnitude of what he stumbled into. He realized that he was like a kindergartener that ran onto the field during an NFL game, thinking that he could play with the men. Today’s FE newcomers often begin at this level, and I hear no end of plans to sneak past the organized suppression, run past it so fast that the suppressors will not know what hit them, and many other fantasies. I probably see that delusion the most often anymore, which is similar to 18-year-old boys pining to prove their manhood on the battlefield.

The next level of awareness might be the most common among people progressing beyond denial of FE’s possibility or existence. They believe that the situation is hopeless and that there is no point in even trying. They are often those building bunkers to survive the coming collapse of global civilization. I have some respect for that position, but it certainly will not help solve humanity’s problems or help the Fifth Epochal Event manifest. Nobody that I respect in the FE field ever felt hopeless. We all began our journeys naïvely, but we never conceded defeat. When the night was the darkest during my journey, then the miracle happened, so admitting defeat before even beginning does not seem productive or even realistic, and can lead to dysfunctional coping behaviors and even suicidal tendencies.

The next level of awareness is similar to those fantasies that organized suppression can be avoided or outmaneuvered. The people in this category are almost all men, and men comprise more than 90% of the FE field today, which is one of its pitfalls. The people at this level of awareness believe that they can defeat the GCs in battle, expose them, and other silly ideas. I call them the Young Warriors, and when they arrive with their armor and weapons, the only outcome that you can guarantee is that when those weapons get used, they will be used on you or the Young Warriors will use them on each other. The GCs will view the resulting carnage with amusement, marveling at how easy the organized suppression game is, when the targets do almost all of the GCs’ work for them. The only warriors of any potential benefit to an FE effort have abandoned coercion and adopted persuasion, usually because they have experienced enough battles and discovered the complete futility of coercion.

The next level of awareness is where Dennis, Brian, and I spent many years, and Dennis and Brian largely stayed there while I finally had to admit that it did not work and was unlikely to, which led to my current strategy. That level is the mass movement mentality. Dennis and Brian drank deeply at the wells of their nationalist indoctrination, as have others with my great respect. Dennis tried forming movements around Christian ideology early in his journey, and even tried it again recently. He also tried the “patriot” approach, and almost all of his efforts either involved risk-free (to the customer) marketing plans, business opportunities, or both. Dennis appealed to all three of the most prominent population management ideologies in the USA to attract interest in and involvement with his efforts. I helped Brian found a non-profit mass movement to raise awareness of FE, and it was the last time that I ever will try the mass movement approach. Mass movements, by their very nature, appeal to lowest-common-denominator beliefs to form movement “cohesion.” Unfortunately, those beliefs are usually false, as nationalism, capitalism, and organized religion are built on lies, half-truths, and self-serving myths. Little resembling enlightenment comes from such ideologies, and I came to believe that enlightenment is the missing ingredient, and the necessary prerequisite for enlightenment is a caring heart. Without that caring heart, the rest will not matter.

When I lived with Dennis in Boston during my beginner's days, when I was also mildly susceptible to delusions of grandeur, Dennis said that “the people” innately cared, but had nothing worth caring about, which was why they danced to the tune of the Establishment’s indoctrination and conditioning, often without much enthusiasm. With little other frame of reference yet, I believed Dennis. I had my naïveté harshly purged during the next few years and received my life’s primary lesson. A decade later, after several attempts, Dennis finally coaxed me into working with him again, which did not last long and I nearly went to prison for my trouble, as the GCs raised the game to a new level of sophistication. When I was with Dennis that time, he admitted that almost nobody really cared, but he was sifting through humanity’s mine tailings, looking for gold nuggets. He rarely found any.

There is another level worth mentioning, where the aspirant is overwhelmed with delusions of grandeur, believing himself to be the messiah, or planning to become the Bill Gates of FE, and even billionaires are susceptible to that delusion, as they play their games of fake philanthropy and insatiable greed.

Only after many years of carrying spears for Dennis and Brian, and trying my own efforts, did I arrive at my current strategy, which has not been tried before that I know of. It is the enlightenment route to FE. Few on Earth today are very enlightened or saintly, if anybody really is, but striving for those goals is where the key to helping FE manifest in public may lie. Many inventors have publicly demonstrated working FE prototypes, but they were all quickly silenced or otherwise removed from the scene, and violence has commonly been applied, although it is less common than it used to be, as the GCs’ bag of tricks has become more sophisticated.

Before discussing my current approach, I will present the state of the FE field today, which also helps explain why I am taking my approach.

All the low-integrity activities in the FE field aside, it has been in a state of arrested development for longer than I have been alive. When the GCs wiped us out in 1988, what made us dangerous was not so much the technology we were working on; we were building a network of businesses that could manufacture and distribute disruptive energy technologies, and Sparky Sweet lived right down the road from us. If we became too prominent to easily snuff out, plenty of people like Sparky could have come forward. That was the primary threat that we presented, led by Dennis’s ingenious methods and his unparalleled courage.

Other than Dennis and a few others, the FE field has generally been dominated by inventors and scientists, stuck at that early stage. It was similar to the super heat pump “industry” when Dennis arrived on the scene. The traditional solar industry also attacked Dennis when he sold the world’s best heating system. Everybody saw Dennis as a threat, not only the energy oligarchy led by the GCs, but “competitors” in the alternative energy field and those scientists and inventors who libeled Dennis. Today, I cannot currently recommend anybody’s efforts in the FE field. There are some worthy players in the milieu, some of whom know they are risking their lives and have suffered organized suppression activities, including murder attempts, but their approach has never come close to working. I will survey some pitfalls that FE aspirants regularly fall into, and stumbling into them can be life-wrecking or fatal.

The GCs are merely the apex predator in a political-economic jungle filled with predators. If the GCs are Godzilla, then the jungles are also filled with tyrannosaurs, velociraptors, and the many docile herbivores that they feast on, with some furtive creatures eking out existences on the margins. Most Americans have no awareness of the issue, but the USA’s federal government has classified thousands of patents, largely energy-related patents, according to credible sources. The 1971 guide for classifying patented technologies extended to photovoltaics that had efficiencies of greater than 10% or any energy conversion technology that achieved greater than 70-80% efficiency. FE devices are often called “over-unity” because they produce more energy than it takes to run them. Consequently, any over-unity device was subject to being classified, and Sparky Sweet’s device was 100,000,000% efficient, which was slightly over the threshold for classifying it. Sparky never patented his device and kept it proprietary, avoiding seizure that way, but that leads to other problems. Thousands of energy technology inventors have had their patented devices seized under the national security laws, and that is merely the tip of the iceberg of what has been suppressed. What got Steven Greer pursuing FE was when he met with a faction of the GCs. The meeting was in the early 1990s, and in 2004 I heard Greer report on his conversations with them; one disclosure was that the GCs had paid $100 billion in bribes to sequester disruptive technologies over the years, and energy technologies above all. When I heard Greer say that, it made perfect sense to me, as Dennis rejected two offers that I know of, I even heard of others in casual conversations with corporate co-workers, and I heard plenty of other such tales from people in the field, and Greer claims to have rejected a $2 billion offer to cease his efforts. The amount might be $200 billion by now.

Those taking the money have donned the “Golden Handcuffs,” as that money bought their silence and their technology was usually shelved, usually with the “seller” being unaware of the true nature of the “sale.” But even Golden Handcuffs are a fair ways down the path of organized suppression. The GCs’ bag of tricks is deep, and many low-cost strategies can be tried before they resort to using Golden Handcuffs, using the patent office to seize technologies and, in the relatively rare instance, violence. We received the first friendly buyout offer soon after we began pursuing FE, and the offer escalated by a couple orders of magnitude before they began to play rough. Kangarooing Dennis into prison and then making “mistakes” that put him in with murderers, is one of many techniques at their disposal, and such treatment can often be free-lance malice engaged in by “public servants” and other Establishment figures, without them needing to be instructed or compensated by the GCs, or even being aware of the evil interests that their actions serve. They probably would not even care if they knew, and many would solicit “employment” if they knew how valuable their activities were to rich and powerful interests, no matter if those activities eventually made Earth uninhabitable (as long as it happened after they died or they were “guaranteed” a berth in the GCs’ survival enclaves).

The GCs are not squeamish, but they rarely resort to violence in the public arena; they know that a string of deaths threatens to focus attention on their efforts. When the GCs’ minions engage in lethal interventions, either by direct murder or throwing people such as Dennis into a shark tank and letting “nature” take its course, what seems to be more important than killing the target in any particular attempt is making it appear to be something other than premeditated murder. I am not at liberty to publicly disclose details of numerous murder attempts that have been described to me either from the target or second-hand by highly credible associates, but it is not easy to murder somebody and make it look like something else (suicides, heart attacks, strange cancer cases, random crimes, accidents, and the like), and if an attempt initially fails, the assassins will not “double tap” them like more mundane assassins will, such as Mafia hit men, as it removes any doubt that it was premeditated murder. If the target survives the initial attempt, the assassins will withdraw and try again another time, as making it look like something else is more important than being successful with any one attempt. That is likely why some FE activists have survived numerous murder attempts. Also, a failed attempt can often have the desired effect, as it can frighten or incapacitate the target to where he (almost always a man, not a woman) is no longer a threat in the disruptive technology field, FE most of all, and further action is unnecessary.

Dennis should be dead dozens of times over. He has survived several outright murder attempts, and few were likely GC attempts, but from other interests. I do not like hearing the stories, and neither did Brian. Brian had firsthand experience with violent suppression and those who experience suppression usually do not make it a point to collect suppression stories as others have, but he knew about 25 dead inventor stories. It is primarily in the realm of disruptive technologies, especially energy technologies, that such organized suppression strategies are used. Such activities are unremarkable in that milieu, although it blows the minds of average people and newcomers to the field. The GCs have developed their organized suppression of disruptive technologies into a science, and that scene from the end of Raiders of the Lost Ark is not very fictional.

Nobody has ever mounted more auspicious or persistent attempts at the businessman’s route to alternative and free energy than Dennis’s. If Dennis could not do it, I do not know who can. But today’s FE field is filled with inventors with dreams of fame and fortune, who think they are the messiah, who apply for patents, who try to raise money, and so on. I have never seen one of them with a prayer of success and I try to ignore them, but I am bombarded with news of the inventor-of-the-hour by various FE enthusiasts. During the month that I drafted this essay’s chapter, I was informed of the activities of no less than half-dozen aspirants and their technologies, with FE being the usual technology, but the “news” can also include high-MPG cars. They are all the same paths to disaster that I have survived, witnessed, heard of, and read of more times than I care to recall. A famous quote attributed to Einstein and Ben Franklin, among others, is that insanity is performing the same act repeatedly, expecting a different outcome each time. The entire FE and alternative energy field suffers from that condition, trying the same approaches literally thousands of times, each time the aspirants thinking that they will succeed. What makes that situation slightly more justified is that few survive the first failure to try again, so the field is “weeded out” that way. Also, the organized suppression is often so subtle that its targets do not even realized that they were suppressed, and those donning the Golden Handcuffs also had their silence bought, and all of those untimely deaths of FE aspirants rarely look like what they probably are to the casual observer, and can be reasonably denied as being murder, if the larger pattern is ignored. However, it is long past time for a different approach and, refreshingly, there have been baby steps in the direction that I will advocate, made by various members of the field.