+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: Removing The Shackles WE HAVE QEG RESONANCE!!!

  1. Link to Post #21
    Great Britain Avalon Member
    Join Date
    2nd May 2014
    Language
    English
    Posts
    1,282
    Thanks
    6,142
    Thanked 6,667 times in 1,189 posts

    Default Re: Removing The Shackles WE HAVE QEG RESONANCE!!!

    I wish them the very best of luck and really do hope they can get the device to work as they expect. No doubt they will go through lots of trials and tribulations, if everything in life worked first time it would be a boring. I don't really know why they find the need to keep giving people a daily update as if its a race, something like the QEG could take quite a bit of time to perfect and it may not work, but that does not matter, a true inventor will pursue their dream with dogged determination and never give up.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to yelik For This Post:

    NewParadigmGuy (20th May 2014)

  3. Link to Post #22
    United States On Sabbatical
    Join Date
    30th June 2011
    Location
    The Seat of Corruption
    Age
    45
    Posts
    9,177
    Thanks
    25,610
    Thanked 53,735 times in 8,696 posts

    Default Re: Removing The Shackles WE HAVE QEG RESONANCE!!!

    Uhh.... 34% efficency.. wow, that's.... no where near OU?
    Quote Posted by Milehigh

    Let's now just do a very basic crunching of the numbers from the clip. We are going to make two very basic assumptions.

    The first assumption is that the voltage and current are perfectly in phase. It's a light bulb load and the frequency is relatively low and that's what we see on the scope display so that's reasonable.

    The second assumption is that we are going to multiply the peak values by one divided by the square root of two, which equals 0.7071. That's what's done for a sine wave. This will not be perfectly accurate but we will live with that. If I can get the model of the scope off of the clip I will look it up.

    So, 1900 volts peak-to-peak, divided by two equals 950 volts.
    950 volts times 0.7071 gives you 671.7 volts RMS.

    From looking at the clip, I am going to say the peak-to-peak current range is 0.95 amps.
    0.95 amps divided by two gives you 0.475 amps.
    0.475 amps times 0.7071 gives you 0.3359 amps RMS.


    Therefore the approximate output power they seem to be measuring in the clip is 671.7 Volts RMS x 0.3359 Amps RMS.

    The approximate output power is 226 watts.

    The electric motor is drawing 655 watts of power.

    Therefore the efficiency of the QEG is 226/655 x 100 = 34.5%.

    Are they a bunch of fools or is this a cynical planned event to stoke up the activity in their suite of PayPal accounts?
    Hard times create strong men, Strong men create good times, Good times create weak men, Weak men create hard times.
    Where are you?

  4. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to TargeT For This Post:

    Atlas (5th June 2014), chancy (20th May 2014), Strat (21st May 2014)

  5. Link to Post #23
    Avalon Member NewParadigmGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Posts
    137
    Thanks
    312
    Thanked 735 times in 123 posts

    Default Re: Removing The Shackles WE HAVE QEG RESONANCE!!!

    Major Breakthrough in Free Energy: Overunity Demonstrated in the QEG

    http://hopegirl2012.wordpress.com/20...ed-in-the-qeg/
    We are humans becoming, help us to become!

  6. Link to Post #24
    Taiwan Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    17th January 2014
    Location
    Asia, mostly H.K.
    Posts
    688
    Thanks
    321
    Thanked 1,816 times in 505 posts

    Default Re: Removing The Shackles WE HAVE QEG RESONANCE!!!

    Quote Posted by aviators (here)
    This is the team from Aouchtam Morocco. With the number of people
    working and looking at this we should have some numbers soon. Data on power that is.
    This is PROOF !!

    Proof that...
    You can fool all of the people some of the time,
    and SOME OF THE PEOPLE ALL OF THE TIME.

    If you want to find dupes, look for them where dupes collect, and
    The One People, OPPT supporters, provide a happy hunting ground



    Anything to do with the OPPT, Heather, and the "Dream Team",
    has proven to be an embarrassing failure.

    I am a fierce and steady critic of the idiocy that have been pumping out.
    They NEVER look back and NEVER admit their mistakes.

    (On the other hand, if they can PROVE something, anything they have promoted,
    I stand ready to admit I am wrong. But we need to examine their claims and
    evidence carefully - something they have NEVER been willing to do.)

    ===
    * Remember, the OPPT (in Morocco) are the same people who :

    + promised everyone on the planet $5 billion each (and are now begging for money),
    + distributed documents which were supposed to allow people to access their value, but when submitted to banks only generated confusion, and wasted time
    + claimed that every bank, all around the world had been foreclosed upon. That was back in July 2012, and now bank shares are trading near record highs.
    + many frustrated OPPT-ers were "harvested" by Mr Sino to back his own similar prosperity scam: SwissIndo - ("if you want to find dupes, look for them where dupes collect")
    + Hopegirl launched a fund, saying she would raise $1 Billion, and after a year managed to raise $50,000, and most of THAT was pumped into the QEG. Then she "bet everything" on the over-promotion of a machine that does not work - and does not deliver what she has claimed it does

    Their past misinformation has been big, always wrong, and WITHOUT APOLOGY.
    Put a fork into their nonsense! They have much to prove, have delivered nothing, and deserve nothing but your "full on" ridicule.
    Last edited by GuyFox; 1st June 2014 at 00:25.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts