Robert Morningstar | So What is Really on the Surface of the Moon and Who Put it There? Part 1 & 2, May 2014

[Helvetic]

Robert Morningstar | So What is Really on the Surface of the Moon and Who Put it There? Part 1 & 2, May 2014

Source: faroutradio.com, ufodigest.com


Source: Watch on Vimeo



May 6, 2014
Robert Morningstar’s Startling Chinese Moon Photo Revelations

Independent Researcher and Analyst:
Robert Morningstar

Join us for a discussion of the recent Chinese photos of the moon and what they reveal. Robert Morningstar has an excellent reputation for anaylzing these space photos in detail and up close to come up with amazing "not there for the naked eye" discoveries beyond our basic scientific understandings.

May 8, 2014
Robert Morningstar’s Astonishing Moon Photo Discoveries Part 2

Independent Researcher and Analyst:
Robert Morningstar

Join us for a part 2 – a contuinuation of our discussion of recent and older moon photos and the "mysterious man made like structures" that they reveal. Robert Morningstar has an excellent reputation for anaylzing these space photos in detail and up close to come up with amazing "not there for the naked eye" discoveries beyond our basic scientific understandings.

About Robert Morningstar:
Robert D. Morningstar is a civilian intelligence analyst and psychotherapist in New York City. He received a degree in psychology from Fordham University. An expert in Chinese language, history, martial arts and is a FAA-licensed pilot and Instrument Ground Instructor with 23 years of flying experience.

Robert has studied the paranormal and UFOs for over 40 years and has published many research articles on the Internet, exposing government cover-up and deception in the JFK Assassination and his work is cited in major books on the assassination, notably in Paris Flammonde's "The Assassination of America" and "Conspiracy Science" by Prof. James Fetzer.

He has also written extensively to expose NASA's use of 'Disinformation Technology' in suppressing evidence of extraterrestrial life and exposing the real nature and threat of the UFO phenomenon. He is currently the Associate Editor of UFO Digest.


Images discussed on the show May 6, 2014:

Double Dome Hangers in The Mare Imbrium






These are not far from where Apollo 12 Landed.




Apollo 14 photo of Saddle rock has an Eye in the Pyramid at the apex.
Lunar Base is self-evident.




"The Great White Tower" on The Far Side of the Moon

[Helvetic]

Images discussed on the show May 8, 2014:

[ghostrider]

I will say that NASA knows the moon is the oldest thing in our solar system ... the anomaly , it doesn't rotate ... it was brought here by a huge comet long long ago ...that comet also brought Venus into our neck of the woods , it is said Venus was a moon of Uranus at one time ... The greatest mystery obits us close , and our leaders conceal so much about our life giving neighbor with many truths on the surface waiting for discovery ...

[Atlas]

Posted by ghostrider (here)
the moon is the oldest thing in our solar system ... the anomaly , it doesn't rotate ...

Yes it does:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=VGnIuqYKnTE

[Atlas]

Posted by Helvetic (here)
Double Dome Hangers in The Mare Imbrium

Posted by Chris
Common sense would tell any normal person that if we are seeing hangars on the surface then we should also be seeing additional infrastructure, eg nearby buildings, power, roads. But we do not. Common sense would also force one to ask "What benefit is a hangar - a structure designed to shield craft from the elements - on the moon?"

Posted by expat
Here's a permalink to the region in the ACT-REACT quick map. Morningstar's "hangars" are the two knobby hills at 24.06°W, 19.87°N.

He plays the exact same game as Hoagland & Bara. Namely, show only forty-year-old images at low resolution, so that there's as much doubt as possible about what we're seeing.

Just as with his story about the "crashed spacecraft", Morningstar has the wrong mission. This is not from Lunar Orbiter at all—it's Apollo 17 Frame #AS17-M-2444, from the mapping camera. So it's 42 years old, and its resolution is a couple of hundred meters per pixel.

He said that he'd spent five hours studying this problem, and he'd noticed that "the astronaut taking the pictures" had kept the "hangars" in view for several frames, proving that he was interested in them. Right there he showed for sure that he doesn't understand that these shots are from the mapping camera, not the handheld Hasselblad.

Posted by Helvetic (here)
"The Great White Tower" on The Far Side of the Moon

Posted by expat
Astoundingly, he also includes what is very obviously a transmission fault in a Soviet Zond 3 image. That one dates from 1964, and its resolution must be many kilometers per pixel. To claim this shows a tower exposes him, I would have thought, to ridicule.

Source: http://dorkmission.blogspot.com.au/2...-his-best.html

[Milneman]

Posted by ghostrider (here)
I will say that NASA knows the moon is the oldest thing in our solar system ... the anomaly , it doesn't rotate ... it was brought here by a huge comet long long ago ...that comet also brought Venus into our neck of the woods , it is said Venus was a moon of Uranus at one time ... The greatest mystery obits us close , and our leaders conceal so much about our life giving neighbor with many truths on the surface waiting for discovery ...

Ghost,

You're actually not correct with that fact. The moon does in fact rotate, once every 27 days on it's axis. It's a synchronous rotation. So it only appears not to rotate but in fact, it does.

[Nick Matkin]

Regarding the Chinese mission to the moon, I've just listened to Richard Hoagland on this edition of 'The Unexplained' podcast. On it he claims the Chinese have release stunning images of ruined crystal towers miles high and a small cairn structure based on tetrahedron geometry near their lander. All published, he says, without reference to them being anomalous on the Chinese People's Liberation Army website.

I'm assuming he's had someone translate the Chinese script on that website so he's sure, but they may not have mentioned it because perhaps they are just... rocks.

Can anyone point me to these pictures? Maybe I'm looking in the wrong place -or TPTB have removed them from the internet - but I just can't see anything significant in the pictures on his website.

(Didn't Hoagland give some talk last year about indisputable ruins on some asteroid? I wish I could see what he sees...)

Nick

[Sunny-side-up]

All very interesting!

I knoticed in the first image of your post 'Double Dome Hangers in The Mare Imbrium' the line of rough rocky ridge that runs right to left, well if you look about 1 and a half inches in from the right more square edged shapes in the rough!