Unexplained Phenomena, Potentially Explained (All Cases)

[Omni]

Thought some people may gain from my perspective on this, so here goes...

All unexplained phenomena in earth society can be explained by (covert)technology. I am not saying it all IS technology. Just that all of it can be explained by technology. Every case...

Here are some things I know for sure can be done technologically:
•Psychic Phenomena
•Remote Viewing
•Channeling
•OBEs/Synthetic Dreams
•Telepathy
•Weather/Earthquakes/Volcanos
•Psychic Attack
•Demonic Possession
•Practically Every Phenomenon experienced can be explained by covert technology.

Every single thing in the universe has scientific mechanics applied to such. For example, every thought/feeling/emotion you have has scientific mechanics that relate to such. Everything has scientific mechanics... Technology can control pretty much all of it at it's apex. Some things I believe could be purely technological and have been covert technology in us, to fool us at times(or just be misidentified) as it being natural, when it is covert technology... The dark ETs are very good at fooling people of illusions, and it is one of their favorite things to do if I had to guess... The US shadow government also is very active in perpetrating illusions...

A couple more bits:
-The All Seeing Eye is Artificial Intelligence that keeps track of literally everything from what I've learned(All thoughts, happenings, all informations, etc)... Access to the all seeing eye could be called psychic when it is really ET influence, not a natural psychic ability. I believe many accurate psychics have technological assistance by extraterrestrials(their guides), and maybe even the US shadow government... I could be wrong but that is where I am at right now regarding psychics...

-It is my view the true akashic records, are actually done by extraterrestrial technology, documenting the history of worlds is a noble and much needed task given how much obfuscation and deception is interwoven into our 'scholarly' history... Regardless if you think it's possible the akashic records are actually in physical ET hard drives or not, access to such a thing would be a big thing for psychics and remote viewers alike.. And I believe sometimes such things are 'in practice' when giving people intuitional guidance etc from ETs.

So, in conclusion, every phenomenon on earth can be explained by technology. Not nec caused by technology, but in making theory about events, technology should practically always be considered IMHO. if you want to test this hypothesis feel free to post something and I can give you how it can be done via technology if you would like. I am extremely experienced in advanced technology...

[Omni]

Experienced a pretty severe attack after posting this thread... Apparently they didn't like me doing such. Nausea sucks

[truth4me]

Omniverse a question. Do you think we have lived this life already and could we be caught in a time loop of sorts?

[Omni]

Posted by truth4me (here)
Omniverse a question. Do you think we have lived this life already and could we be caught in a time loop of sorts?

I'm a firm believer in one organic timeline for the universe that we are all connected to. I'm also a firm believer that time travel back into the past, or distant future is not a reality. In saying such I mean you can't go back to now from the future. I think time has mechanics that involve some open source mechanics, but I don't think we can time travel back like 2000 years or anything like that. I don't for example, think ETs are us from the future. Maybe like us but not us IMHO.

I believe the future, which the now passes through, is not set in stone. I believe the best ways TPTB know the future, is by controlling what goes on in the now. Not by projecting into an actual future... Also by predictions, and also analysis of other worlds that were in similar stages to us right now at another time.

Sorry for rambling... I don't think our full timeline is a loop in any way really. One can experience 'groundhog day' effects but I don't think we have lived these lives before. It's possible we have had very similar lives in the past though. So we could resonate with being in a loop that way I could see.. Some of us have lived in these times on other worlds in our incarnation history. Meaning on other worlds in the same developmental period...

[Tyy1907]

As I read Omnis first post I too felt a bit of nausea, followed by sexual energy type of feeling. Strange.

[wnlight]

Omni, back on June 18th I posted a prediction that the US secret military would mount an attack on Japan in 2018 using a newer, stronger tectonic pulse weapon which will destroy Japan. That they had caused the Japan earthquake in 2011 using HAARP. Shortly after, I got an email message letting me know that I am being carefully watched. My question is, do you think that the earthquakes in Japan, New Zealand and others were man-made? My information and confirmation has only come from meditation and dowsing.

[Omni]

Posted by wnlight (here)
Omni, back on June 18th I posted a prediction that the US secret military would mount an attack on Japan in 2018 using a newer, stronger tectonic pulse weapon which will destroy Japan. That they had caused the Japan earthquake in 2011 using HAARP. Shortly after, I got an email message letting me know that I am being carefully watched. My question is, do you think that the earthquakes in Japan, New Zealand and others were man-made? My information and confirmation has only come from meditation and dowsing.

I'm not sure if they were man-made or not. I like to work with probabilities when I'm working with conspiracy theory. I'd say Japan earthquake in 2011(if thats the right year) was a 50/50 chance to be man-made or not. But I'm rather clueless about it's finer details. Others may be able to say a bigger percentage either way..

I predicted the earthquake in japan in the icke chatroom vaguely as well. I just said Japan will likely be hit with an earthquake, along with new york potentially having to install measures against a rising sea level(and seattle+ others).. All of it had no time limit in it though. I meant in a very long time for new york and seattle etc.

Sorry I can't be of more help. But I don't know the answer to your question.

[ghostrider]

I must totally agree , these things can be done by technology ... all the more important that humans learn to control their thinking ...

[Frank V]

Posted by Omniverse (here)

Posted by truth4me (here)
Omniverse a question. Do you think we have lived this life already and could we be caught in a time loop of sorts?

I'm a firm believer in one organic timeline for the universe that we are all connected to. I'm also a firm believer that time travel back into the past, or distant future is not a reality. In saying such I mean you can't go back to now from the future. I think time has mechanics that involve some open source mechanics, but I don't think we can time travel back like 2000 years or anything like that. I don't for example, think ETs are us from the future. Maybe like us but not us IMHO. [...]

Time travel is possible, but not in the way it is typically interpreted or shown in movies, et al. One can go back to a point in the past on the current timeline, but if one attempts to alter the timeline by altering the events from the past, then this will not have repercussions on the timeline you left from. As soon as you alter anything to the events of the past, you branch off a new timeline for yourself, and as such, you will have influenced "the future", but not the one on the timeline whence you left.

I have tried to explain this once before here on Avalon. Imagine that you are stepping into a time machine. The clock on the wall in the room containing the time machine says "10:00". Your watch also says "10:00". You set the time machine for a trip to 06:00. The trip will take 2 minutes. You engage the time machine. After two minutes, you step outside, and the clock on the wall says "06:00", but your watch will say "10:02". That's because while you were travelling to the past of the timeline you were on, the moment of your arrival there is actually a point two minutes into the future from where you left on your own, personal timeline.

All of this may seem confusing, but it's not, really, if you consider that our very presence here is in fact, at the grander level of Creation, an illusion. You are not really here, and the people you interact with are only other emanations of the same primary consciousness of Source. We are all individuals and we're all different, but the consciousness that makes us into living beings, is one and the same for each and every one of us.

Think of your computer. Think of your refrigerator. Think of your television. In and of themselves, these things represent nothing at all. They are boat anchors, or paperweights. But what makes them into the devices they are, is electricity. It's the same electricity that flows through your computer as what flows through your refrigerator and through your television. And with electricity, your computer becomes a computer, your refrigerator becomes a refrigerator, and your television becomes a television. It's all the same electricity, but it is this electricity which allows each individual device to become what it was intended to be.

Therefore, when you travel back to the past - even if only by a few hours - and you interact with the people you know there, at that particular moment in time, which is in the past from where you left, then you have altered the timeline already, and then you are on a new timeline. On this new timeline, you will be able to interact with the people you know, but they are merely projections in that particular reality. And they will behave exactly as you expected them to behave. They are the same people, but you are experiencing them as who they are only in your own reality.

In essence, the same is true for all of us here at this point in time, without time travel. And that is because in terms of consciousness, we are all one and the same, and there is only One. It's an illusion that we are many. Not a bad illusion, mind you. I for one am happy that I am me, and I have no desire to become a singularity-kind of being. I am happy to be an individual among many other individuals. But it still is an illusion, because there is in essence only Source, the Prime Creator. It is the primary of all illusions: the separation between Self and Other.

That all said and with both of our feet both back on the ground, what happens to the timeline you left from is that you can only return to it if you haven't actually changed the past. If you have changed it, then you will return to what you thought was the present, but this is a point in the future of the point in the past that you seek to return from. It'll no longer be on the timeline you left from in the first place. So to those on that original timeline, you have simply gone elsewhere and nobody knows where, while from your own point of view, you will have travelled back to the past, made a change, and then gone back to "the present" from which you left, and things are not quite the same anymore as when you left on your trip to the past.

Complicated, huh? :-D

Posted by Omniverse (here)
I believe the future, which the now passes through, is not set in stone. I believe the best ways TPTB know the future, is by controlling what goes on in the now. Not by projecting into an actual future... Also by predictions, and also analysis of other worlds that were in similar stages to us right now at another time.

The future is never set in stone, but the events of the present (and also those of the past) will limit the possible outcomes of the future. There will always be junction points - choices - and so there will always be multiple possibilities, but the number of possibilities for the future is already partly confined by the actions of the moment.

By consequence, traveling to the future is possible, but it will only be a potential future, not the future, because there is no such thing.

Posted by Omniverse (here)
Sorry for rambling... I don't think our full timeline is a loop in any way really. One can experience 'groundhog day' effects but I don't think we have lived these lives before. It's possible we have had very similar lives in the past though. So we could resonate with being in a loop that way I could see.. Some of us have lived in these times on other worlds in our incarnation history. Meaning on other worlds in the same developmental period...

No Groundhog Day scenario, but certain things are cyclic. Time does not really pass from moment to moment - by which I mean "timestamps on a clock" - but rather from event to event. And certain events do reoccur, even if ever so slightly differently. As a more prosaic example, we could look at what Hegel said, which basically boils down to "Those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it."

And that is something we see all the time. :-)

[Omni]

Posted by Aragorn (here)
Time travel is possible, but not in the way it is typically interpreted or shown in movies, et al. One can go back to a point in the past on the current timeline, but if one attempts to alter the timeline by altering the events from the past, then this will not have repercussions on the timeline you left from. As soon as you alter anything to the events of the past, you branch off a new timeline for yourself, and as such, you will have influenced "the future", but not the one on the timeline whence you left.

The problem I have with this theory is if you create a whole new timeline, does that mean every other person is not a real person? Are they not real souls experiencing the universe just like you connected to you? Sorry but I totally discount such an ideas based on that premise alone. It debunks it IMHO. I could be missing something though of course... But I find it absolutely illogical that all the other people I interact with are not real souls having an experience...

Also, I do not define reality as an illusion. I define false concepts and ideas illusions...

[wnlight]

Aragorn, No man ever steps into the the same river twice. - Heraclitus

[Frank V]

Posted by Omniverse (here)

Posted by Aragorn (here)
Time travel is possible, but not in the way it is typically interpreted or shown in movies, et al. One can go back to a point in the past on the current timeline, but if one attempts to alter the timeline by altering the events from the past, then this will not have repercussions on the timeline you left from. As soon as you alter anything to the events of the past, you branch off a new timeline for yourself, and as such, you will have influenced "the future", but not the one on the timeline whence you left.

The problem I have with this theory is if you create a whole new timeline, does that mean every other person is not a real person?

Yes and no. The only thing that is actually real is that there is a single consciousness, being Source itself. From there on, everything is an illusion, created by Source for the sake of its own desire to experience. Of course, in this illusion, we all exist as individuals, with our own properties. But it is the Primary Consciousness of Source which allows us to be who we are, and which allows us to be individuals.

Posted by Omniverse (here)
Are they not real souls experiencing the universe just like you connected to you? Sorry but I totally discount such an ideas based on that premise alone. It debunks it IMHO. I could be missing something though of course... But I find it absolutely illogical that all the other people I interact with are not real souls having an experience...

That is not what I said. ;-) By being on the same timeline as others, you are part of the group consciousness field of those others, but you are still an individual, so you can wander away from that, for instance by placing yourself on a different timeline. At that moment, you have created a new reality for yourself, and the people you see are the reflections of other souls whom you knew on the original timeline, and they will behave just as they did there, but their actions in your reality and their re-action to your presence there will of course only exist in your reality. So they are not "duplicates".

They are who they are, but you will have created an alternate reality, which will add another aspect to each individual person's consciousness as an alternate timeline which they will be able to access via meditation, but which they are not experiencing directly as their own consciousness is still focused on the original timeline from which you chose to depart.

Think of multiple strings, braided into a thin rope, and multiple thin ropes braided into a thicker rope, and thicker ropes braided into a cable. That's how parallel realities work, and the strings are each person's individual consciousness, whereas the thin ropes are the group consciousness of the timeline they are on, the thicker rope is the group consciousness of all of Earth across all timelines, and so on. (This analogy was brought forth in Bill Ryan's interview of Inelia Benz.)

Posted by Omniverse (here)
Also, I do not define reality as an illusion. I define false concepts and ideas illusions...

The illusion is at the level of Source. Beyond Source, everything is an illusion - literally everything. You do not have to see that as a negative thing, because it's not about deception. It's about the experience. Source is conscious, and Source is knowledge, but knowledge alone is worthless to Source without that there is also an experience to explain what that knowledge - read: "information" - means.

It is hard to comprehend, but it is all real and illusion at the same time. When you are having a dream while you are sleeping, everything there seems real to you as well: the people you interact with, the places where you go. Sometimes something "surreal" may enter your dream, but that's because dreams are a product of consciousness having to overcome the limitations of a brain which is only partly cognitive, given that it is asleep. But nevertheless, while you are in the dream, you typically don't know that you are dreaming - unless you are having lucid dreams every single night.

So what is "real"? What does that word mean? It's all subjective, and subjectivity is one of the primary reasons behind Creation. Subjectivity is the experience.

We are all one, and yet we are all distinct. Or as someone else once put it, "We all only exist in God's dreams."

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Posted by wnlight (here)
Aragorn, No man ever steps into the the same river twice. - Heraclitus

May I ask to what concretely you are referring? Hopefully not to the Hegelian interpretation of "Those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it", because I'm afraid that many people are stepping into the same river again as they already have... and many times before, even.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Hmmm... I don't know where that "post update" thing came from. I tried to make that two very distinct replies, but somehow the forum engine insists that they go into one single post. Weird... :-/

[Omni]

Posted by Aragorn (here)
Yes and no. The only thing that is actually real is that there is a single consciousness, being Source itself. From there on, everything is an illusion, created by Source for the sake of its own desire to experience.

I find such beliefs somewhat disempowering personally, and likely not true. It's the type of new age stuff I believe is psy op stuff Mark Passio brilliantly talks about...

I do find such concepts a little selfish for this source. So everything is for God and not for anything else? I couldn't disagree more with you.

The illusion is at the level of Source. Beyond Source, everything is an illusion - literally everything.

I exist. So does my mother. She and I are on the same timeline. You and I are on the same universal timeline. I find the idea kind of ridiculous that the people I interact with are not really people. Sorry I just find it totally incorrect.

By your own logic, am I not even speaking to you? Am I not real to you? Are there not readers of this material having their own experience, real?

[Frank V]

Posted by Omniverse (here)

Posted by Aragorn (here)
Yes and no. The only thing that is actually real is that there is a single consciousness, being Source itself. From there on, everything is an illusion, created by Source for the sake of its own desire to experience.

I find such beliefs somewhat disempowering personally, and likely not true. It's the type of new age stuff I believe is psy op stuff Mark Passio brilliantly talks about...

I don't see why it would be. It makes perfect sense, in every possible way.

Posted by Omniverse (here)
I do find such concepts a little selfish for this source. So everything is for God and not for anything else? I couldn't disagree more with you.

How can Source be selfish if Source is all that exists? But to understand that, you must think of the very beginning of Creation. This is actually something which stands above time and space, and therefore hard to understand by the human mind.

Posted by Omniverse (here)

The illusion is at the level of Source. Beyond Source, everything is an illusion - literally everything.

I exist. So does my mother. She and I are on the same timeline. You and I are on the same universal timeline. I find the idea kind of ridiculous that the people I interact with are not really people. Sorry I just find it totally incorrect.

Again, that is not what I said. That is what you interpret from my words.

You do exist. Your mother does exist. I do exist. We all do exist. And yet, what does that mean, "to exist"? Because in the end, all there really is, is Creation, and Creation is an illusion which Source has brought upon itself so as to be able to experience itself as All That Is And All That Is Not.

Posted by Omniverse (here)
By your own logic, am I not even speaking to you? Am I not real to you? Are there not readers of this material having their own experience, real?

Please read again what I have written higher up, but this time, try seeing it from the grander perspective of Source itself. By claiming that you exist outside of Source, you are actually saying that Source did not create you. Source most certainly did create you, from itself. You are Source - or rather, an aspect of it.

Your soul is an individual, but your consciousness is the same as mine, as your mother's, as Bill Ryan's, and even as that of Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Idi Amin Dada and other such people, because that consciousness is nothing but the electricity which allows us all to be living entities. It flows through all of us. And that consciousness, is Source, the Prime Creator, the primordial Self. And please note that "consciousness" is not the same thing as "soul", or "spirit". The soul/spirit is your identity. It is the device that you are, but the device can only become a device if it has electricity flowing through it. Without that, it's a boat anchor or a paperweight.

I cannot explain this to you any clearer in human language, I'm afraid. But even if you fail to understand what I am trying to convey onto you, that doesn't make it any less valid. And maybe you cannot accept it now, because you do not understand. But one day you will - I am sure of that.

Everything exists, even that which does not exist, because it all exists within Creation, and Creation is the illusion that Source brought upon itself.

[wnlight]

Aragorn, about the river. I was saying that when you return to your present after a visit to the past, it will not be the same, nor will you. The 'present' that you left behind can never be attained again and in that sense is no longer valid for you.

The statement that you take from Hegel is not based on an understanding of the relationship of the future based upon the past and present, but rater his is based upon the understanding of human nature. That people tend to make the same mistakes over and over.

[Omni]

Aragorn I think we can agree to disagree respectfully. Just because I do not believe something doesn't mean I don't understand it. To me the idea of other people not being real souls experiencing reality , because I'm on some alternate timeline... That idea will never be credible to me...

Posted by Aragorn (here)
By claiming that you exist outside of Source, you are actually saying that Source did not create you.

Not sure how you got this. I never stated I wasn't. I don't subscribe to your ideas of God if that is what you mean...

Posted by Aragorn (here)
Hmmm... I don't know where that "post update" thing came from. I tried to make that two very distinct replies, but somehow the forum engine insists that they go into one single post. Weird... :-/

If you post another reply within a certain amount of time it adds it to your last post, if your post was the last in the thread.

[Frank V]

Posted by wnlight (here)
Aragorn, about the river. I was saying that when you return to your present after a visit to the past, it will not be the same, nor will you. The 'present' that you left behind can never be attained again and in that sense is no longer valid for you.

That is also what I said, but there is an exception to the rule, which is if you travel to the past only as an observer and you do not change anything there which would affect either your own timeline or the history of the timeline that you were on when you left. The minute you change something, it becomes a separate and all new timeline, and you can never go back again.

Posted by wnlight (here)
The statement that you take from Hegel is not based on an understanding of the relationship of the future based upon the past and present, but rater his is based upon the understanding of human nature. That people tend to make the same mistakes over and over.

Exactly, but it was my understanding that you were implying that people never make the same mistake again. In Dutch, we have a saying that translates as "A donkey never kicks the same stone twice", and we usually say that when a person makes a mistake and appears prone to making it again in the near future. Kind of a warning along the lines of "Once bitten, twice shy". :-)

[Frank V]

Posted by Omniverse (here)
Aragorn I think we can agree to disagree respectfully. Just because I do not believe something doesn't mean I don't understand it. To me the idea of other people not being real souls experiencing reality , because I'm on some alternate timeline... That idea will never be credible to me...

I'm not saying that they are not real souls. What I was trying to convey is that you are no longer interacting with them at their conscious level as you knew them before you left on your journey to the past. The part of their consciousness you're interacting with is not where the focus of their own consciousness dwells, and you will be interacting with alternative manifestations of the same people, whose alternative manifestations you yourself will have created by branching off the timeline.

This appears difficult to understand, but at that moment, you are the Creator, because you have just created a new timeline, and from the point of view that we are all just concepts within the consciousness of the Prime Creator, Source, and that at the level of pure consciousness, we thus are Source, that makes perfect sense.

The best way I've seen it all presented is in a symbol representing a snake which lies in a circular shape and bites its own tail.

Posted by Omniverse (here)

Posted by Aragorn (here)
By claiming that you exist outside of Source, you are actually saying that Source did not create you.

Not sure how you got this. I never stated I wasn't. I don't subscribe to your ideas of God if that is what you mean...

You don't subscribe to the idea of a Creation and of Source, or you just don't like the word "God"? If the latter, I was only using that word so as to loosely quote someone. I do find that using that word often makes it sound "more acceptable" to certain people, and specifically those who cannot let go of a religious indoctrination.

In my opinion, anything which calls itself a god and which demands worship is by definition not worthy of that worship. But luckily, Source does not demand worship. It has no use for that at all.

Posted by Omniverse (here)

Posted by Aragorn (here)
Hmmm... I don't know where that "post update" thing came from. I tried to make that two very distinct replies, but somehow the forum engine insists that they go into one single post. Weird... :-/

If you post another reply within a certain amount of time it adds it to your last post, if your post was the last in the thread.

Thank you for explaining. I had already seen that on other people's posts, but I had assumed that they had inserted that "post update" thing themselves as part of a post-edit. I didn't know that it had something to do with a timeout. ;-)

[Fellow Aspirant]

I am of the mind that such technology (and I believe it exists) is working to access the existing Akashic Record, which is not technologically based. It has existed since way before mankind existed; from before the Big Bang, actually. It is a holographically structured series of light interference patterns that are the result of every particle action and interaction since the origin of our universe. It is beyond time and space but is of time/space, "frozen" into waves. Technology, which is artificial, is just a collection of tools, some good, some not so good, that allows some practitioners to do what others have been doing for millenia, i.e. use their own minds to interact with the spiritual plane wherein the Akashic Record is found. Beings who use technology to do this are making their own imprints on the field, but their influence is relatively recent (the last hundred years) and may be able to duplicate some effects of spiritual beings, but they are not the prime movers of reality. They are only a flash-in-the-pan sideshow. That's my take, anyway.

B.

[Agape]

Posted by Omniverse (here)
Experienced a pretty severe attack after posting this thread... Apparently they didn't like me doing such. Nausea sucks

You can't explain heart-sick. You can only explain what you can measure . Sometimes you claim to be a Soul ( the duality Soul-Body is purely human matter , it does not exist in the same way with advanced species in Universe unless they were artificial - PLFs )
and sometimes you claim to be inorganic AI. The AI can only analyse symptoms of the disease , not causes . That's how any technology is capable of making people mind sick even if it's helpful technology .
It does not care about you . It cares only what you show . Like a vampire, it asks you for input , endlessly , so it can analyse .

There's a capability in living Beings you may /may not be fully aware of at this time ..that has to do both with knowledge and compassion .. that can't be substituted by any technology .

It's tad deeper than you go usually , in most deliberations , it's deeper than the cutting-edge scientific thoughts of today . It's in the nature of Life, beyond Earth and the only Way you know is by Experience anyway .





P.S. : There's so much confusion I reflect from peoples minds that can't be rationally explained that it sends me to whirlpool .