+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: 'Sickos' US Police states...perfectly legal.....‘No Refusal’ Blood Draws StandardFare During Holidays Checkpoints

  1. Link to Post #1
    UK Avalon Member Cidersomerset's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th May 2011
    Location
    Bridgwater somerset UK
    Age
    65
    Posts
    22,333
    Thanks
    33,460
    Thanked 79,823 times in 18,702 posts

    Default 'Sickos' US Police states...perfectly legal.....‘No Refusal’ Blood Draws StandardFare During Holidays Checkpoints

    This looks like a scene out of futuristic police state movie......Or Guantánamo Bay



    ‘No Refusal’ Blood Draws now Standard Fare During Holidays Checkpoints

    Monday 1st September 2014 at 09:32 By david-icke



    Published on 31 Aug 2014


    Click Show More to Read More:
    I DO NOT agree with drunk driving nor do I agree to a clear violation of the Forth
    Amendment on the pretext that you may have done something wrong. ~ jman

    The police state will be rolling out in full force this Labor Day weekend, as police
    departments in several states prepare to violate their citizens’ Fourth Amendment
    protections, under the guise of keeping drunk drivers off the road.

    Cops nationwide are warning holiday revelers they will be subject to mandatory
    blood draws if an officer "MERELY SUSPECTS" them of driving under the influence.

    The practice, termed “no refusal,” involves police administering roadside sobriety
    tests, alcohol breath tests or forcibly extracting blood samples without a person’s
    consent, securing evidence which would aid a future conviction. A judge is typically
    on hand to issue search warrants, attempting to give the illegal blood draws an air
    of legitimacy in the face of blatant constitutional violations.

    In states like Florida, police went one step further by erecting guilty-until-proven-
    innocent roadside checkpoints in the week leading up to the Labor Day weekend,
    where officers inspected driver’s licenses, proofs of insurance, vehicle registrations
    and checked for seat belt violations.

    “Saturation patrols, bar and tavern checks, and checkpoints will also be held at
    various locations in Tennessee, Georgia and the southeastern states,” according to
    WDEF.com.

    Police in Georgia will also be working alongside Alabama, and North and South
    Carolina law enforcement agencies in an effort titled “Hands Across the Border,”
    which emphasizes law enforcement entities’ authority to stop drunk drivers visiting
    from other states.

    Local police across the state of Texas, in cities such as Dallas, Austin, Galveston
    and the Rio Grande Valley, are also enforcing no refusal blood draws ostensibly to
    stem drunk driving fatalities.

    A report from a Fox affiliate in Georgia last year showed police constraining
    unwilling participants’ arms, legs, hands, and feet when they refused to relent to a
    blood draw, while one restrained man asked, “What country is this?”

    “We all are American citizens and you guys have me strapped to a table like I’m in
    Guantanamo f***ing Bay,” complained Mike Choroski while several officers hovered
    over him.

    “I’m a taxpaying American who refused something….I refused to do this….what
    happened to me in that room was unnecessary and nobody should have to do
    that,” said Choroski.

    As police in numerous states use the pretext of “safety” to circumvent freedoms
    prescribed in the Fourth Amendment, which is supposed to protect American
    citizens from unwarranted “unreasonable searches and seizures,” the U.S. Supreme
    Court has upheld efforts to go after people who refuse to consent to blood draws,
    indicating this represents “consciousness of guilt.” In other words, states may
    prosecute someone for refusing a blood draw on the grounds that doing so
    represents an admission of their guilt.

    “A January 2013 ruling affirmed that a warrant must be obtained for the process,”
    noted Paul Joseph Watson, adding, “although police could dispense with the
    warrant requirement in an ‘emergency.’”

    The accuracy of results garnered through such procedures has been the subject of
    contention, however. “Breathalyzer tests have previously been proven to be
    inaccurate in a high percentage of cases, with many factors rendering the
    results ‘little more than scientific guesswork,’” reported Steve Watson in
    June. “Further research has shown that police officers often influence the results of
    breathalyzer tests, resulting in inaccurately high readings. Blood tests can also
    produce false high readings of alcohol levels if they are not conducted quickly and
    properly.”

    Article From: http://thefreethoughtproject.com/vamp...

    ===================================================


    Yasiin Bey (aka Mos Def) force fed under standard Guantánamo Bay procedure




    Published on 8 Jul 2013


    Yasiin Bey (aka Mos Def) force fed under standard Guantánamo Bay procedure
    Subscribe to the Guardian HERE: http://bitly.com/UvkFpD


    ===================================================

    If you want to know who inspired ISIS....

    Torture -The Guantanamo Guidebook



    Published on 28 Aug 2012


    UK's channel 4 "Guantanamo Handbook" documentary

    UK Channel 4
    Last edited by Cidersomerset; 2nd September 2014 at 20:01.

  2. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Cidersomerset For This Post:

    Joanne Shepard (1st September 2014), naste.de.lumina (1st September 2014), Nasu (3rd September 2014), sigma6 (2nd September 2014), wnlight (1st September 2014)

  3. Link to Post #2
    UK Avalon Member Cidersomerset's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th May 2011
    Location
    Bridgwater somerset UK
    Age
    65
    Posts
    22,333
    Thanks
    33,460
    Thanked 79,823 times in 18,702 posts

    Default Re: 'Sickos' US Police states...perfectly legal.....‘No Refusal’ Blood Draws StandardFare During Holidays Checkpoints

    I wonder where they got this idea from ??? Oh the CIA....


    Islamic State Waterboarded James Foley and Other Captives




    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ISIS dot com: Social Media Barons Are Pushing the New Barbarity

    new Monday 1st September 2014 at 12:11 By david-icke










    ‘Something stinks in the upper echelon of the mega media barons.

    Isn’t it interesting how Facebook bots will censor certain political posts, or
    how your page can be pulled down for a remark someone behind the
    communitarian curtain claims is ‘offensive’, while jihadist and ISIS terror
    gangs are allowed to openly use the same social media platforms like
    Twitter and Facebook for recruitment, ‘martyr selfies’, marketing,
    T-Shirt sales, and to post murder photos?

    If only the problem ended there. Something much deeper, and much
    more insidious is going on behind the doors of Silicon Valley, Hollywood
    and CIA meeting rooms, or maybe not – they tell us this is simply
    progress. New and dark cultural features are being unleashed into the
    minds of the public via the War on Terror, and it’s all for profit…’

    Read more: ISIS dot com: Social Media Barons Are Pushing the New Barbarity

    http://21stcenturywire.com/2014/08/3...new-barbarity/
    Last edited by Cidersomerset; 1st September 2014 at 15:02.

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cidersomerset For This Post:

    Nasu (3rd September 2014), sigma6 (2nd September 2014)

  5. Link to Post #3
    Ecuador Honored, Retired Member. Warren passed on 2 July, 2020.
    Join Date
    28th March 2014
    Location
    Cuenca, Ecuador
    Posts
    953
    Thanks
    5,175
    Thanked 5,548 times in 865 posts

    Default Re: 'Sickos' US Police states...perfectly legal.....‘No Refusal’ Blood Draws StandardFare During Holidays Checkpoints

    Those who are truly DWI need be removed from the road. However, we do not need to break the law and violate human rights in order to clear the roads of drunks that are breaking the law and endangering the rights of others. The State should not lower itself to the offender's level. Until a reasonable, non-invasive technology is developed, we could simply arrest the drivers more obviously drunk, and prosecute them in court without the blood tests. If a person's refusal represents “consciousness of guilt” then let a jury decide that. As far as the US Supreme Court is concerned, the majority is a bunch of paid puppets of TPTB.

    We do need to get these DWI offenders off the road. They are a serious danger during peak drinking days/nights. We have come a long way. I remember when in Albuquerque in the 1970s that being intoxicated was a defense plea for justifiable homicide along the road. "But your Honour, I didn't mean to kill him. I was drunk!" would usually get the defendant off the hook.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to wnlight For This Post:

    Cidersomerset (1st September 2014)

  7. Link to Post #4
    UK Avalon Member Cidersomerset's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th May 2011
    Location
    Bridgwater somerset UK
    Age
    65
    Posts
    22,333
    Thanks
    33,460
    Thanked 79,823 times in 18,702 posts

    Default Re: 'Sickos' US Police states...perfectly legal.....‘No Refusal’ Blood Draws StandardFare During Holidays Checkpoints

    Quote Those who are truly DWI need be removed from the road
    Every country has drunk drivers , but I have not come across what seems
    to have happened in the US especially since 9/11. Sure drunk drivers
    should lose their licences and jailed if appropriate, but what happened
    to the breatherlizer ? It looks really creepy and another 'Drip' Drip'
    towards taking away your rights more and more....

    ====================================================

    The way the US/UK and others got away with spying on their own
    public was for each to spy on each others populations and share
    the data....

    This article seems to a way round another delicate subject.....


    G4S Guantanamo contract ‘breaches UK policy’

    Monday 1st September 2014 at 10:09 By david-icke





    ‘The government is being asked to take action against British firm G4S, after it
    emerged the company has won a £71m contract to provide a range of ‘base
    support’ services at Guantánamo Bay.

    Legal charity Reprieve, which assists Guantánamo prisoners such as British resident
    Shaker Aamer, has submitted a dossier of evidence to the UK’s responsible
    business watchdog, the National Contact Point for the OECD Guidelines (UK NCP).
    The submission argues that by providing ‘essential’ services at the prison, G4S will
    be contravening British government policy that the prison must be closed, as well
    as the OECD’s guidelines for responsible business conduct.’

    Read more: G4S Guantanamo contract ‘breaches UK policy’

    http://rinf.com/alt-news/editorials/...hes-uk-policy/
    Last edited by Cidersomerset; 1st September 2014 at 16:04.

  8. Link to Post #5
    Ecuador Honored, Retired Member. Warren passed on 2 July, 2020.
    Join Date
    28th March 2014
    Location
    Cuenca, Ecuador
    Posts
    953
    Thanks
    5,175
    Thanked 5,548 times in 865 posts

    Default Re: 'Sickos' US Police states...perfectly legal.....‘No Refusal’ Blood Draws StandardFare During Holidays Checkpoints

    I like the New Mexico state police uniforms better. They really have the Nazi SS look.

  9. Link to Post #6
    UK Avalon Member Ecnal61's Avatar
    Join Date
    15th May 2011
    Age
    65
    Posts
    297
    Thanks
    4,422
    Thanked 812 times in 260 posts

    Default Re: 'Sickos' US Police states...perfectly legal.....‘No Refusal’ Blood Draws StandardFare During Holidays Checkpoints

    blimey cider the last time i saw blood being taken without permission it was done by some bloke called count dracula!! seriously though it seems like just another loss of a personel liberty that the american people have been hit with and i really feel for them..today its americans blood, tomorrow it could be stem cells,bone marrow or even organs,i think the blood is the thin edge of the wedge.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts