WADE FRAZIER : A Healed Planet

[Kay]

Hi Wade

I first saw your essay mentioned on the other thread and so having read it and joined the forum I posted there.

I am new to this and still finding my way around!

I will repost my comment here;

I have just spent several days "chewing on" your essay.
I have joined this forum so that I can join in this thread.

I admit to being scientifically illiterate so I found the first part heavy going, but as I progressed I began to understand the need to start at the beginning and see the whole picture.

Over the past few years I have started reading your thread a couple of time and ended up following links and getting bogged down. You are a very prolific writer Wade . When I recently saw that you had written this essay and put your ideas into one document I was determined to try again.

Despite what I thought I already knew I feel quite shell shocked.

I need to read it again, to follow the links which I consciously ignored the first time.

I just wanted to say to anyone who is listening that this essay is a very important document and will probably change your view of life on this planet and your priorities.

K

[Kay]

It is interesting that your last post is about human nature. Reading the whole story of man kinds behaviour and history on this planet made me feel deeply sad and wonder if we deserve free energy and what we will do with it? Are we ready for it?

You paint a wonderful picture of a possible abundant future without greed or competition. Can we really change that much or will it take a generation or two for us to switch from fear based behaviour to sharing and love?

What damage could we do in the meantime?

K

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Kay:

You are expressing what I call Level 5 fear of FE. There are no guarantees in life, but some things I can guarantee…

• If humanity does not embrace FE, and soon, World War III is going to be fought over the last high-EROI on Earth, which is primarily in the Middle East region and toward Central Asia. The USA has murdered around ten million people in that part of the world during the past generation, and if World War II commences, ten million deaths will be a footnote. The casualties could number in the billions.

• Fukushima will not be "cleaned up" in my lifetime, and may still spell the end of Japan as we know it, and it will not be the last nuclear disaster. I know people who moved to the Southern Hemisphere because of the not-outlandish fear that Fukushima could still "blow" and "bless" the Northern Hemisphere with fallout that will make it seem like some kind of Mad Max movie.

• The Gulf BP oil spill will be far from the last like it, as hard-to-get hydrocarbons are all that is left outside of OPEC.

• Maybe those bullets are miraculously dodged and humanity can keep finding and burning hydrocarbons at ever-increasing rates. If that happens, atmospheric carbon dioxide PPM will get up toward 1,000 in this century, and humanity may artificially induce another Greenhouse Earth. The last time that Earth went from Icehouse to Greenhouse conditions, Earth had its greatest mass extinction. Leading scientists are concerned that humanity may reproduce quite a few of the dynamics of the Permian Extinction by continuing to burn hydrocarbons. We have already been inflicting the Sixth Mass Extinction on Earth's species for the past 50,000 years, and if we keep on our current trajectory, we might even beat the Permian levels of extinction. That would be quite an achievement.

Have you digested those parts of my essay yet? So, what will it be? Destroying Earth's ecosystems and taking humanity with it, because we are unable or unwilling to change our trajectory toward an even greater catastrophe than what humans have already inflicted on Earth, or the risk that there may be some misuse of FE in the transition?

The purpose of my envisioned "choir" is two-fold.

The first is to help reach a critical mass so that FE can overcome humanity's inertia and the organized suppression. The second is to amass a nugget of enlightenment, the kind never seen on Earth before, that can help assure a harmless implementation of FE.

There are no guarantees, but I found that people with Level 5 fears really feared that the world would end as they know it, and they are just afraid of losing the niche of hell that they so carefully carved out for themselves. Such people are trapped in their scarcity-based awareness, and cannot comprehend abundance, and will not until it can be demonstrated to them, and only FE can do that.

Best,

Wade

[Kay]

Yes I see your point Wade, if we carry on as we are we will certainly destroy Earth's ecosystem, where as FE will hopefully give us the power to start repairing the damage we have done.

I read a very depressing article today;
http://www.salon.com/2014/09/06/the_...worse_partner/
about the "revolution in drilling technology" enabling the USA to increase their domestic out put to 8.5 million barrel a day in 2014!
Strengthening the economy and creating jobs has become a more popular govt policy than reducing emissions!
Since the crash in 2008 people are too busy trying to hold on to their lifestyles to see the larger picture.


Despite my earlier comments I do believe in mankind's ability to turn things around. Human beings are complex and wonderful creatures full of potential, ideas, curiosity, and courage. So often at their best when under pressure.
Modern western society is very cleverly designed and arranged to keep us tied in, distracted and oh so very busy!

I would like to hear more about your plans to "amass a nugget of enlightenment ". People reading forums such as this are already part of a global spiritual enlightenment, seeking deeper meaning and purpose, but it is a slow process and we are running out of time.

K

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Kay:

The "news" is one unending horror show, on one hand, and on the other, it is designed to keep the masses asleep. Anybody involved with FE is well aware of the "abuse" fears in the populace. If people get past knee-jerk denial, it might be the most common response. People do not even see the potential before they react with fear. When Greer is asked that question, he replies that the worst elements of humanity already possess that technology.

The Global Controllers are well aware that we will turn Earth into a cinder on the path that we are traveling, and terraforming Mars as their "ace in the hole" survival enclave is one of their plans. Another plan is to "thin out" the human herd to about 500 million or so (to reduce humanity's burden on Earth's ecosystems), and enslave those few bedraggled survivors. The plans are not mutually exclusive, either. Waiting out the catastrophe on Mars, while those seven billion "useless eaters" get to endure a holocaust that makes all others in human history pale into significance, shows how those plans may be related. Also, the saner members of the cabal want FE to come out, even though they realize that it will mean the end of their reign on Earth. Members of that faction gave my friend a show.

The masses will not wake up with talk. I eventually discovered that on my own, although people such as Machiavelli wrote about it long ago. The mass movement Level 10 stuff will not work, which is why I am doing something different. Level 12 is a far cry from Level 10. The choir has to be built, first.

My goal is to create the technology and then give it away to the public. A handful of production-ready models, given to humanity (not the energy institutions, as Robert thought), will be enough. To further respond to Robert, demos like what Trombly, Gray, Dennis, Reed, Sweet, and many others (such as QEG) have done are not what I am referring to. A proof of concept demo is nearly meaningless, and there is about a $200 million gulf between a proof-of-concept demo and a production-ready model, and that is one of the biggest hurdles, and all of those "sneak past them" ideas are naïve and potentially fatal.

My essay is the best tool to gain an enlightened perspective on the energy issue that I know of, and people will need to go deeply, and not come up for air for months or years, before it really sinks in.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Yesterday, I went to one of my favorite spots on Earth. Unlike last year, when it was under snow when I visited in early October, I went a month earlier, and got the attached photos. The red foliage in that picture is made of blueberry leaves. I picked a quart of berries in an hour. When you can pick a quart that quickly, you are in the mother lode of meadows. When I was younger, I joked that "waist-high blues" were the only berries that I deigned to pick in the high season, preferably lining the trail, where I hardly needed to slow down to pick them. Yesterday, after an hour of stooping to pick (some waist highs, but mostly knee highs and ankle highs), my aching back told me how right I was when younger. It is the first "berry-back" that I ever got, as I turn into an old man.

But, oh the joy of the hike. I was euphoric on the drive to the trailhead, and the hike lived up to every minute of it. I have definitely gotten my fair share in this lifetime, and days like yesterday are like a fairy tale.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

This is a spook post. Secrecy and deception are dark path tools, and I have no use for them. Some close to me have played those games in an attempt to outmaneuver the Global Controllers and deceive people into saving themselves. I hated it when efforts that I was in began playing secrecy and deception games, and they always ended in disaster. Secrecy and deception are not tools of light path beings.

That is why my "choir" will not have any anonymous members (anonymity is a reaction to fear), and if we eventually get to the stage of making FE on the technological side, there will be no proprietary "secret sauce" ingredients, no self-seeking with patents and the rest of those doomed approaches. We will be trying something different.

I grew up during the Cold War and in the Vietnam Era in particular. Both of my grandfathers fought in the world wars (one in WWI, and the other in WWII), my father was a Marine in Korea, and all of my uncles, some cousins, and both brothers were in the military. It is the American Way. I have many friends a little older than me who ended up in Vietnam. One deserted, and others served in an array of roles. Of those I knew and knew of, some were only supply-chain vets, others were medics, and some were in combat and killed people with their bare hands, tortured them to death, and the like. Some of what I heard was incredibly brutal, which makes those recent beheading-American-journalist videos seem like child's play. Some were inducted into "off-the-books" and Special Forces missions that will never be declassified. I have friends with a lot of blood on their hands. It is all part of the evil that the USA has been inflicting on the world for centuries, from the very beginning. In the past generation, I have encountered Iraq and Afghanistan vets, and what a mess they are, but their suffering was nothing compared to what they helped inflict on people in distant lands.

I know far more about the spooks than I want to know. One close relative was a CIA contract agent, and I got to hear all about his sorry secret life. My friends have told me about their secret missions and the like. The USA's hiring all the useful Nazis after World War II only took the game to new levels. The CIA was founded with death camp Nazis, and the CIA's mission has been evil from the beginning. But it is not all spook stuff. Most at the CIA have GS ratings and pensions, such as Ralph McGehee. Some are on the privatized side and in middle management and can keep their hands relatively clean. The contract agent side of the house does most of the wet work. My close relative also had blood on his hands playing the spook game, and subsequently drank himself to death. Psychopaths can be useful tools, but must be used very carefully. They got sicced on us during my days with Dennis (1, 2, 3), and it was educational. Brian O nearly died at the hands of the spooks, and the incident shortened his life. When I told Brian about my friend's little show, his immediate response "So, he got a show from the spooks."

Not only are there "off-the-shelf" contract agents from an array of sources, but another entryway to the spook world is through the military. Even discounting what my friend witnessed a mere three weeks after the John Kennedy assassination, among the serious researchers, Lee Harvey Oswald's military intelligence career path is pretty obvious, even though the USA's government went to great lengths to try to cover it up.

People have asked me how I could spot the psychopaths, and my reply was that it was not hard. Good guys do not engage in such activities, but it was incredible to see how easily they duped people. They could not dupe honest people, or not for long. If you study how mobsters operate, many of their scams are outsmarting dishonest people. A common one is duping somebody to think that they can get a windfall by playing a deception where the crook acts like a dupe. But the marks end up with something worthless (thinking that they "took" the con man) and the con man gets the last laugh. The opening scene in The Sting shows one of those, and there are many variations. Your best protection is honesty.

I know far more about that world than I can write about in any post, but the point that I want to make is that almost nobody has a mature and balanced perspective of the issue. They either deny the spook and conspiratorial side, or they obsess over it (and this can extend to trans-physical realms, and the disinformation in that realm can be pretty pervasive). Both think like victims. A creator will acknowledge those dark games and move on. It is the height of foolishness to try to outsmart or otherwise beat the dark pathers and spooks at their own games. But I constantly encounter that mindset. Often, it is rooted in adolescent fantasies, where people have watched too many James Bond movies. That mentality is behind what I call Level 7, where FE newbies think that they can sneak past Godzilla. It is a boy's fantasy, but I have also had women make their "sneak past them" suggestions. I have patience issues, as I have admitted many times and as is evident in my Avalon writings, and I have definitely been able to work on it in this lifetime, as I field the same naïve observations and "bright ideas" countless times.

The public has an interest in the spooks and conspiracist stuff, but their mentality is at about the tabloid level. Some around me tried to get a vicarious sniff of my journey, and some even began to believe their fantasies and think that they were being subjected to spook stuff. Paranoid delusions come with the territory, and I have seen people fall to them. People like Greer have overreacted to the spook stuff (although he has good reason to) and play a very dangerous game. It is one thing to be subjected to those activities, and it is another to think that you can defeat them by playing the game better than they can. The only way to win is to refuse to play.

Many FE newbies and others with a passing familiarity with my work think that I am somehow fascinated with the spook stuff, want to beat Godzilla at his own game, and similar ideas. That is the furthest thing from my mind, and when I see people trying to drag me into that stuff, I generally try to get as far away from them as I can. Avalon has been a mixed bag on that score.

My spiritual lessons while young taught me a few things that were vitally important for walking my path as far as I have:

• Love is always the answer;
• The means become the ends;
• The truth beats a lie any day, no matter how lying may seem strategically useful.
• Secrecy is self-defeating.
• The answers are within us, not outside.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

A friend died yesterday. He was a mathematician who worked for either Microsoft or for one of Bill Gates's private companies for more than 20 years. Over the years, we would talk about Microsoft and how they were run. Their management practices, such as stack-ranking, turned the place into a shark tank. My friend lamented the practices that wrecked their ability to innovate and produce good products. We doubted that Microsoft would be able to change its DNA to become innovators.

In his later years, my friend worked for a company that Bill Gates owned, and my friend came up with an innovation that is today used in Microsoft's search technology. Bill Gates came to his office to meet with him during the excitement over his breakthrough. One my friend's prized possessions was a picture of him and Gates in a conference room, discussing his innovation, which eventually made my friend a lot of money. I am no Bill Gates fan, but his humble lifestyle is typical of how the high-tech potentates live, particularly on the West Coast. The capitalist aspects of high tech are a very mixed bag, but the vast sums of money in high tech are partly why the open source movement exists (no direct thanks to Microsoft). Dennis's brilliant marketing plans, where he put equipment on people's homes for free, is the closest thing to FE that has ever been on the world market, and I am taking pages from those books with my current strategy. Dennis and Brian would see elements of their approaches in what I am doing.

My friend's death was a long, drawn-out affair that lasted months, and his health problems began with pneumonia as a child in Australia, before penicillin was widely used, and other developmental problems (which I am pretty sure was related to his poor diet and the hygiene standards of the time). His lung and other damage from those childhood conditions shortened his life. I was not at his side when he passed, but my wife was. I was praying for him last night and unexpectedly went into a deep trance, the kind that I know means something important. Suddenly, I felt a great peace and happiness, and I believe it was his joy of leaving his body and entering the next realm. Similar events happened with relatives I was close to, such as my grandparents. I believe that he met his mother, first. When my wife got home, I asked if he passed at the time that I had that experience, and she said that he did. My friend was very happy when he moved on and left his broken body behind.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

On a daily basis, I read news of impending and ongoing disasters that would simply vanish with the implementation of FE. I just read this one, which is no news to me, but living just up the wetter coast brings that situation home more than others. I wrote about the Medieval Warm Period droughts in Western North America, which helped collapse the Mayan and Anasazi civilizations.

The grim fact is that today, most of humanity does not have reliable access to clean water. But FE means far, far more than solving California's water problems: it means the end of civilization as we know it, and traits that are considered human "nature" today can radically change. Gangs of violent men will no longer dominate humanity, from the GCs to American presidents, corporate executives, organized crime, and inner-city gangs. In fact, I just added the below to my essay.


"Violent male gangs, from the GCs to American presidents, war industry executives, organized crime, and inner city gangs, will no longer dominate humanity. Women will have to step up to help make that happen. If bonobos could do it, I have confidence that humans can."


I had written it elsewhere, but needed to place it into my essay. The "choir" needs to get familiar with the changes that FE will bring, and learn to not fear them. For all previous Epochal Events, nobody before the event could imagine what the event would bring, and they would have all feared the idea of the next Epochal Event, as it meant the end of the world as they knew it. But, for this Epochal Event, we can have some idea what it will mean. That is something new.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

One thing that FE newcomers need to disabuse themselves of ASAP (and I have tried to help them ) is that when they begin to comprehend FE's reality and its potential, that they think that they are the first people to have ever reached their levels of understanding, and that they have bright ideas for making FE happen, which are almost invariably along the lines of Levels 6, 7, 9, 10, and 11. That is the ego talking. The deadliest delusions are probably held by those with Level 7 notions, where they think that Godzilla is asleep, dead, or is not vigilant.

While the information and the way it is presented in my big essay is unprecedented (to my knowledge, which is why I did it) in something made for public consumption, nobody should labor under the illusion that the GCs are oblivious to the role that energy plays in today's world, the role it has always played, and what FE's potential is. In ways, I am sure that they understand the situation far better than I do. They know that energy is the linchpin of the human economy and always has been. Even though John Rockefeller funded the university that founded today's dominant macroeconomic ideology, which ignores energy and elevates mythical "free markets" to preeminent status, nobody should assume that the architects of that situation are oblivious to the reality behind their creation. The GCs are very well aware that FE and its related technologies, such as antigravity, will make elites obsolete. Although the Left has an ideological objection to the very idea of GCs and their conscious manipulation of the world's economy, I discovered the hard way that not only do they exist and are vigilant, but that their bag of tricks is deep and sophisticated.

There is dissention in their ranks, the saner members do not want to have to live on Mars in case the GCs' games make Earth uninhabitable, and members of that faction are almost certainly the people who gave my friend a little exotic technology show, the kind that is no big news in my circles.

Just because John Q. Public is deaf, blind, and mindless, and has no idea how energy runs the world, and we see little of that realization in the media and academia, particularly among economists (although scientists easily understand it), it is the height of folly to think that the people who run the world are so clueless. Energy is the Big One, and the GCs keenly understand that issue.

As I write this, I am reminded of the presidential debates of 1992, when Ross Perot was the third-party candidate that ended George Bush the First's reign (as Ralph Nader arguably scuttled Al Gore's chances and gave the presidency to George the Second, although I regard the arguments as a bit specious). I saw some commentators from the Left note that when Perot said that American foreign policy was about making Earth safe for the profits of American-based transnational corporations, Clinton was visibly stunned but tried to hide it. There Perot was, giving away the game, right in front of the nation. Clinton tried to divert the conversation back toward safe ground, but he need not have worried. Most Americans really are not stupid enough to think that our foreign policy is about anything other than lining American pockets. That whole charade of spreading freedom and democracy is only for the benefit of the truly mindless who need their fairy tales, but provides a nice cover story for naked pursuit of self-interest, as usual. So, not even Americans are really that stupid, but it is never good to openly admit to the charade.

So, FE newbies need to understand, ASAP, that whatever realizations that they are having while pondering FE and its implications, the GCs are about a century ahead of them. The big difference between me and a GC is that I see heaven on Earth potentially coming from it, while all that the GCs can see is losing their power and ability to call the shots on Earth. I can only hope that they underestimate the power of love.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

I have been hard at work making posts to my forum (1, 2) that are not really appropriate here. I am trying to get enough meat on the bones before I finish my big essay and resume my career. As I wrote in that first post referred to above, I plan to post at Avalon as long as I am able to.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Just a quick post…

I have been playing editor and fielding comments and just got finished with my editor's comments. The most common kind of comment that I get is from pals who are trying to make my work palatable to the masses. They are not my target audience. Pals want to try to turn on their families, friends, and colleagues to my work, no matter how much I try to dissuade them. I am looking for needles in haystacks, not trying to attract John Q. Public's attention. John Q. Public will only begin to wake up when FE is delivered to his home. Those who are trying to make my work something for the masses are still stuck in Level 10. Level 10 will not work. I spent years in Level 10 myself, until I finally saw its futility. Dennis is still in Level 10, as was Brian. I am doing something different, and do not expect many people to understand. But I am looking for those who can.

Best,

Wade

[ulli]

Posted by Wade Frazier (here)
Hi:

Just a quick post…

I have been playing editor and fielding comments and just got finished with my editor's comments. The most common kind of comment that I get is from pals who are trying to make my work palatable to the masses. They are not my target audience. Pals want to try to turn on their families, friends, and colleagues to my work, no matter how much I try to dissuade them. I am looking for needles in haystacks, not trying to attract John Q. Public's attention. John Q. Public will only begin to wake up when FE is delivered to his home. Those who are trying to make my work something for the masses are still stuck in Level 10. Level 10 will not work. I spent years in Level 10 myself, until I finally saw its futility. Dennis is still in Level 10, as was Brian. I am doing something different, and do not expect many people to understand. But I am looking for those who can.

Best,

Wade

It's democratic programming, don't you agree? Quantity rather than quality;
and if one doesn't want to play the game that way one is considered an elitist.

But what matters in the end...whatever one's agenda, or life purpose,
if one can't be effective there is no point in trying.
The time has come, and you will get your choir, Wade.
And a new generation is appearing who seem to expect FE in their own lifetime.
This will add extra fuel (excuse the pun) to the choir.

[Wade Frazier]

Thanks Ulli:

Humans have a herd animal heritage, and to the extent that we act like them, we abdicate our sentience. I was just reading up on Athenian democracy, and whipping up the crowd with emotional arguments was typical. Today's "democracies" use more scientific methods to manipulate the masses for elite benefit. Creating a stampede and calling it "democracy" is how it is done in the West.

Yes, the youth will likely be the people to make it happen, if anybody does. They are not yet as ossified into the ways of "thinking" that "grown-up" adults have. We will see what kind of singing happens, and what it can accomplish.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

I am doing heavy lifting in the editing department, and am adding tidbits here and there, such as this:


In very real terms, economic production relies on work performed, and the physics definition of work is what economic work is rooted in. Moving an automobile or airplane requires work. Moving water requires work, as does running a household appliance or computer. Electricity can power a machine or a light. Energy consumption causes work to be performed, and that is why energy consumption and GDP have that tight relationship. Neoclassical economists, with their supply and demand curves and other social/monetary constructs generally disregard that relationship, as they abandoned the real world for social theories, which is why scientists do not have much respect for them.


Back to work.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Every year at this time, as school goes back in session, my Columbus essay gets heavy traffic, which also spills over into my American Empire essay. They have a combined traffic in September so far that is a combined six times the volume on my energy essay. I hope that it is not always that way, but for another year, it is.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

One way that people try to be helpful in making my work palatable for the masses (which I am not trying to do) is to avoid certain words or ideas that have been stigmatized in the popular culture. Again, I do not seek to engage the masses, but I also want to help repair the degeneration of language and discourse that I see all around me.

For instance, my experiences radicalized me. Another word for it is awakened, but in intelligent political circles, "radicalized" has nothing to do with the kinds of spiritual adolescents that abound in the "black bloc," so-called "radical Islam," and similar movements. I write about that plenty in my work. The current "jihads" of Islam were actually created as tools of American foreign policy, which is a subject that I rarely find an American able to rationally engage, in these "war on terror" days. The "black bloc" protestors are also very bad news, and are either a bunch of teenage boys with oppositional defiance and conduct disorders and easily infiltrated by agents provocateurs, or operations that are largely provocateur-created. Mature American activists know that the first person who begins advocating destructive or violent "civil disobedience" in any dissident organization is probably the plant from the FBI. Most "terror" operations in the USA that our Homeland Security defeated were usually gullible or stupid "black bloc" types who were easily manipulated by the FBI and others into becoming "terrorists." The "terror racket" interests literally create the "monsters" that they then defeat, which is also a great way to control the populace with fear. George Orwell's 1984 frankly discussed that kind of public manipulation, and the White House has used it as its playbook since 2001.

The last presidential debate that I watched was in 1992, when it was the Ross Perot circus. I clearly recall watching the 1988 debates between Bush the First and Mike Dukakis, whose political grandstanding I was all too familiar with. Dukakis belonged to the ACLU, which is a tame, establishment-run "human rights" organization. When I went through my nightmare in Ventura and asked Gary Wean what I could do, he informed me that the ACLU was phony. It did not really take on the big issues, but liked to appear as if it did. The kind of raping that we were receiving was the kind of action that the ACLU would not touch with a ten-foot pole.

The ACLU is a lapdog organization that has a cozy relationship with real power, similar to how environmental organizations are all kind of phony, where they run away, shrieking, at the mention of FE. It is a common situation, where the organizations that portray themselves as leaders in solving the big problems actually do not want them to be solved, as they were captured by the dominant interests, are trying to make a living by "solving" the problems, or were phony to begin with.

So, even as tame and worthless as the ACLU is, in the presidential debates, Dukakis's membership in the ACLU caused Bush to call him a "card-carrying liberal," as if it was the equivalent of being a "commie." It was more of the Orwellian Newspeak that permeates American discourse, where the meanings of words are turned upside down. "Liberal" and "conservative" have been distorted almost beyond recognition in the USA.

The word "radical" means "root," and all worthy radicalism addresses root causes and does not hack at branches. But the term has been purposefully confused in American discourse as describing some kind of "terror" operation. Brian O used "radical" to describe himself, and for the same reason that I do: because it is accurate and seeks to rescue the original meaning of the term from the Orwellian distortions of it today.

Similarly, some readers advise me to downplay the biographical aspects of my work, as it just seems too way out there. I am sorry, but facts are facts, and my tale is full of documentation, as unbelievable as it may seem to armchair "activists" and other newcomers to my work. The last thing that I am trying to do is seduce the mainstream into reading my work and sneaking in the "radical" stuff deep into my work. I am a "what you see is what you get" kind of guy. I bring up the UFO issue, for instance, because it is very germane to my work. Brian poked his nose into UFOs and it shortened his life. An astronaut looking into UFOs is the furthest thing from tabloid fodder that I can imagine. I am also Brian's biographer and am the first and so far only person that I know of who finally disclosed what Brian was afraid to disclose while he was alive. Also, you cannot look into UFOs for very long before realizing that the organized suppression around UFOs is actually performed by the same people who suppress FE, and for the same reasons. People who feel threatened by the very well documented situations surrounding UFOs and FE are not in my target audience, and putting my experiences early in my essay is partly intended to scare such people off. They should not be reading my work, as it can blow their minds to bits. I have watched people go off the deep end when they barely brushed up against my work, and it was not easy to watch. I do not want people to end up in mental institutions because they encountered my work.

Similarly, some people want me to stop using FE, and instead use New Energy, Zero-Point Energy, and other terms. Well, I am going to fight that one, too. I grew up with the term, and while I mention and define the others, FE is what I am staying with. Jeane Manning has collected more than thirty names for the zero-point field. If people get hung up on the terminology, they are not going to go anywhere important.

Sometimes I surrender and use new terms that become popular. For instance, when I began reading the Seth material in the mid-1970s, I was unaware of the long history of spiritual mediumship (called "speaking in tongues" and other terms over the millennia), and I think that Jane Roberts was called a "medium" while she was alive. Then along came Shirley MacLaine and the New Age in the 1980s, and mediumship began to be referred to as "channeling." I was confused by the term at first and hated it, but it became so universally used and understood that I use it myself today. It does not turn the meaning of "mediumship" upside down, and everybody has a general idea of the meaning, so I surrendered on that one.

But where perfectly good words and ideas become stigmatized by the popular culture, partly because they are acquiescing to the "mind f**k" and other manipulations of the social managers, some of whom work for Godzilla, then I will resist acquiescing to the song of the popular mind.

The ideas and information are important, not the language.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

As I edit away, I am not just looking for grammar and other errors, but making sure I got it all as accurate as I could, and that includes taking a look at the most recent findings. In the past few days, I read a National Geographic special edition on dinosaurs and a Scientific American special edition on human evolution. I found a few new findings and some new arguments, and I made small tweaks to the essay to reflect those that I thought were relevant. Those kinds of publications are often filled with guest articles by leading scientists in their fields, so it can be a good way to see what the state of the art is. For pretty much all of my essay, I do not ask more scientific acumen from my readers than being able to understand publications such as those. The scientific findings are really not all that hard to understand, and watching how competing hypotheses fare in light of the evidence can be highly educational.

However, the political nature of Scientific American can really be blatant and make it hard to recommend as regular reading material. Noted "skeptic" Michael Shermer is a regular Scientific American columnist, and people like him constantly engage in the logical fallacy of thinking that materialism is the only rational way to think. It is not even a logical position, and I constantly see them purvey the false dichotomy of organized religion versus materialism, as if those are the only two possible ways to view the cosmos. And then people like Shermer assail the religions, and Christianity in particular, and think that they have made the case for materialism. Those "debates" are essentially battles between two fundamentalist camps, and neither one understands.

Shermer even teaches classes on "skepticism," and in the syllabus, the Level 3 mentality can clearly be seen, with a chapter on conspiracy theories and several chapters that assail religion. Shermer was raised as a Christian, and Christians becoming materialists, or childhood left-wingers become rabid right-wingers, like David Horowitz did, is a typical psychological reaction to one's upbringing, but it has little to do with a pursuit of the truth. So called "skeptics" are little more than establishment defenders, and last year's "debunking" of JFK "conspiracy theories" was typical "skepticism." Of course, they called it a case of the "skeptics" being conspiracy theorists, which was quite a feat of Orwellian Newspeak. It was as if the "skeptics" could say, "See, we are not always right," but the "skeptics" that they used were anything but members of the movement. It was a straw man argument where the straw man was them. Neat trick.

Equating materialism with rationalism is a logical fallacy that I constantly see, and that supposedly intelligent people make such arguments is really a mind-bender for me. Can't they see the irrationality? Even people such as Stephen Hawking do it. What is wrong with them? I think is an emotional attachment to their beliefs, and the prospect that it is not a rational position never seems to occur to them. How such "smart" people can be so irrational is partly behind Brian's question if we are really a sentience species. I think that when it comes down to it, both the religionists and materialists lack experience. In the first ten seconds of the first "case" that I was involved in, materialism was shooed out the door and could never come back. I knew. Everything that I experienced since then was merely icing on the cake. How, if such experiences are so easy to attain, can the materialists fail to achieve them? It may have to do with their soul age, I suppose.

It is just so strange to me how such "smart" people can be so irrational while thinking that their logic is impeccable.

Time for chores.

Best,

Wade

[Ilie Pandia]

It is just so strange to me how such "smart" people can be so irrational while thinking that their logic is impeccable.

Another way to look at it is lack of responsibility.

With religion: God (or some other Higher Force) did it and I am a victim of that.

With materialism: It's the blind chance or random matter interactions and I am the victim of that.

None of them think as a creator.

To be a creator you need to assume responsibility for the "good" but also for the "bad". You cannot have one without the other.

Can you imagine explaining that to Stephen Hawking? His position rather makes sense... He is an accident in this huge existence and he is not responsible for any of it. It happened to him!

Of course, this is only an assumption of the curtain he keeps over his awareness, so he does not have to look at the real issue. Being a creator may not feel that great you think you've messed up big time. Then you wish you were just a victim and have nothing to do with the situation: "Oh no, I didn't do this... not me.. hey! I'm the victim here!"

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Ilie's brilliant response shows how even I need to be reminded what is really happening, at its root, even though I write about it endlessly. If they proceed from the victim assumption, instead of the creator assumption, then their "logic" makes sense, even though they never explicitly acknowledge that that is their assumption. Their irrational dismissals, refusal to really investigate, much less seek out such experiences for themselves, are really ornate ways to avoid the issue that maybe they are the authors of their existence and asked to be here. For somebody who woke up, their positions seem crazy.

I am sympathetic to their dilemma and have done plenty of whining myself about it, but if such "smart" people can be so irrational, what does it say for the human ability to be rational? It goes back to Brian's sentient species question and the love/fear divide. If we are fearful, we see everything through the victim's lens. A world based on abundance instead of scarcity will go a long way toward reducing the vibe of fear that permeates everything so deeply that the world's "smartest" people are oblivious to it.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade