Isis

[Snookie]

Posted by GalaxyHorse (here)
Sure looks like B.S pre-warned, staged strike ...there is a lot of weird stuff going down - Alex Jones has a lot of the truth, ISIS are a Pentagon creation
same groups as AL Qaeda designed to propagate the dark strategies - who can you trust in these times.

According to Mr. Duff senior Editor of Veterans Today ISIS/ISIL is comprised of Saudi secret service agents, Mossad agents and CIA agents. Sounds about right to me.

[Roisin]

As such information surfaces to public consciousness via the internet, eventually the avg. citizen out there will refuse to allow "them" to conscript our sons and daughters to fight their wars. We are already at a point where that may happened sooner than we think. Just look at how many people out there who are "on the fence" about the official report on what happened on 9/11.

[Hervé]

The Khorasans: As Fake As the Kardashians

Posted on September 25, 2014 by WashingtonsBlog

New Boogeyman Has Already Been Debunked

Obama is now – after the fact – scrambling to justify bombing the sovereign nation of Syria without the permission of either the Syrian government or even the United States Congress by saying that we were going after the super-evil Khorasans, who were about to attack us.

My God! That sounds terrifying … like a cross between Genghis Khan, Klingons and the Kardashians!

The U.S. is saying that they’re even more dangerous than ISIS.

There’s just one wee little problem … the Khorasan threat is as as fake as the Kardashians’ physiques. (Admittedly, it’s confusing, given that the Kardashians have also inserted themselves right in the middle of the Syrian conflict.)

Agence France-Presse reports:

[...]

Full article: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2014/...rdashians.html

[ghostrider]

also men in the middle east knowing War since birth , would never put a huge piece of artillery in wide open so it can be seen easily by aircraft , soldiers would go out of their way to conceal the location of such a weapon , it's combat 101 , concealment ...

[gripreaper]

Posted by giovonni (here)
thanks for the bumps

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Posted by buares (here)

Posted by bogeyman (here)
Only governments can provide this sort of thing.

Like their cars for example ?


Image: ISIS began its invasion into Iraqi territory from NATO-member Turkey, through Syria and riding in Toyota Hilux trucks – identical to those provided to “moderates” by the US State Department as part of multi-million dollar “non-lethal” aid packages. ISIS did not take these trucks from “moderates,” the moderates never existed to begin with. From the beginning, it was the West’s plan to raise a mercenary army of sectarian extremists operating under the banner of Al Qaeda. (source)

[/url]

Well yea, you're gonna want the TRD "turbo" package, ya know, in case you need to make a quick getaway, the extra horsepower could come in handy under fire...and the 4x4 "on the fly" with the rear differential lock gives you more traction in the sand! And the SR-5 models come with the sunroofs, ideal for setting up machine guns, and the leather seating will be easier to clean after a hard days work from standing up through the sunroof, and the running boards are also quite handy for riding outside the cabs. The brush guards and rock sliders protect the vital internals from excessive damage while you're killing and beheading innocent people, and the double cabs come in handy if you want to bring along a few friends. The SR-5 also comes with usb ports and mp3 so that you can document your murders, play your favorite music, and keep in touch with all your jihadist friends while murdering and pillaging. Then you can upload your favorite beheading video's to your laptops and distribute them for world viewing to create the "memes" the globalists want imbedded in our consciousness! I believe these models are also rated as half tons, so when you're done pillaging and you want to head back to the house for a bite to eat, these trucks can handle the load!

So, outfitting this engineered mercenary boogie man with the latest options on the latest models only makes sense!

[PAVONIA]

I just find it funny these "terror groups" pop up outta know where! This group wasnt any threat to us, and then a few people get their head chopped off and we're ready to go to war?? Bull****. ISIS has become the new group the governement is trying to hype up like they'll attack us or make fake claims of big plots. Horrible.

[syrwong]

It is believed by many (including David Icke) that the sudden appearance of ISIS will quickly lead to the start of WW3 , but I have not seen a good explanation why this is so. I could however guess the following would happen:

1. The bombing of ISIS is taking away the pretense the bombing of Syria, that is, an invasion of Syria.
2. Syria will have to engage in a war against some bigger enemies than ISIS.
3. Iran will come to aid Syria, as they have an alliance.
4. China and Russia must side with Iran against even bigger enemies, and at the same time must be quite busy with their neighboring enemies.
5. The war that involves Russia and China must be officially WW3.

I am not sure of the logic of these consequences. These events may still take two years to develop. Can anyone supplement or rebuke this?

[giovonni]

Posted by Maia Gabrial (here)

This group didn't just form in a matter of months or a few years, it is well trained, well armed, well funded, and determined. Only governments can provide this sort of thing.

I agree. Sadly, the US govt is the guilty one....

i sense it goes a lot deeper than just the fronting by the US illegal government ...

Posted by gripreaper (here)
oops! Double post.

Thanks everyone for your responses oops and all ...

[DeDukshyn]

Posted by bogeyman (here)
How did ISIS become so organised and effective. Where did it get its billions of dollars? Where did it gets its training? How come no one saw this group coming? How come no one heard of this group before? Did it just appear from know where? what are we not being told?

1) Money, Modern high end weapons, and elite training.

2) The Western countries publicly gave them our hard earned tax dollars:http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013...ill-want-more/

3) USA Mostly - They'll train anyone for whatever reasons:

" ... while the C.I.A. runs a covert program to arm and train the Syrian rebels"

from HERE, and this is interesting now ... http://rt.com/usa/191048-hagel-dempsey-command-isis/

4) Putin did, and warned everyone: http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/16/world/...ria-civil-war/

5) New marketing strategy required.

6) Nope. Mixmash of labelled groups used previously.

7) The above.

My 2 cents

[Milneman]

Posted by Paul (here)

Posted by jackovesk (here)
PS - Which makes this (Man/Jew) the most Powerful/Influential voice on the planet..!!!

Posted by Milneman (here)
Jakov would you agree that these individuals are also part of this problem?

So far as I can tell, Rupert Murdock (media mogul over Fox News, et al) is clearly a Zionist, but not so clearly Jewish.

In our forum version of political correctness, I recommend using the words with the base of "Jew" to refer to a large class of some 13 million people, of widely varying sorts, though common faith and heritage, just as the word "Texan" refers to a similar large and diverse class of some 26 million people, of common location.

The consensus (so far as I am aware, and I think a reasonable consensus) on this forum is that such large classes of people are not, en masse, evil. Even though Ariel Sharon claimed to be Jewish, and George W. Bush claimed to be Texan, that doesn't (I hope) make all Jews or Texans as evil as those two.

(Feel free to substitute "Australian" for "Texan" above, a group of similar size, on ten times the land. No doubt you can recommend better than I who best fits the Australian example of George W. Bush.)

I recommend using words such as "Zionist" to refer to a smaller group of people who have adopted a strong pro-Israel nationalist view, where it seems likely that Israel is in considerable part a Rothschild creation, intended to sow the seeds of conflict in the Middle East. Rabid Zionist supporters are a more dangerous and/or deluded lot, just as rabid George W. Bush supporters are. I'd know - I was once a rabid George W. Bush supporter.

Labeling someone Jewish, in a negative context, (whether clearly Jewish, or as in the case of Rupert Murdock, unclearly so) often tends, in my experience here, to be received, by some good members here, as a deliberate, unjustified and offensive incitement to outrage and slander on the large class of Jewish people. Pretty clearly your labeling Murdock as a "Man/Jew" was not entirely intended in a positive or even neutral light, especially given the juxtaposition with the image of Hitler doing the Nazi salute.

May I request, jackovesk, that you change "Man/Jew" to "Man/Zionist", or else explain the error(s) of my thinking?

(There is certainly at least one error in my thinking: Trying to persuade yourself to make a change to a post on the grounds of "political correctness" .)

Thank you Paul!

[jackovesk]

Posted by Paul (here)

Posted by jackovesk (here)
PS - Which makes this (Man/Jew) the most Powerful/Influential voice on the planet..!!!

Posted by Milneman (here)
Jakov would you agree that these individuals are also part of this problem?

So far as I can tell, Rupert Murdock (media mogul over Fox News, et al) is clearly a Zionist, but not so clearly Jewish.

In our forum version of political correctness, I recommend using the words with the base of "Jew" to refer to a large class of some 13 million people, of widely varying sorts, though common faith and heritage, just as the word "Texan" refers to a similar large and diverse class of some 26 million people, of common location.

The consensus (so far as I am aware, and I think a reasonable consensus) on this forum is that such large classes of people are not, en masse, evil. Even though Ariel Sharon claimed to be Jewish, and George W. Bush claimed to be Texan, that doesn't (I hope) make all Jews or Texans as evil as those two.

(Feel free to substitute "Australian" for "Texan" above, a group of similar size, on ten times the land. No doubt you can recommend better than I who best fits the Australian example of George W. Bush.)

I recommend using words such as "Zionist" to refer to a smaller group of people who have adopted a strong pro-Israel nationalist view, where it seems likely that Israel is in considerable part a Rothschild creation, intended to sow the seeds of conflict in the Middle East. Rabid Zionist supporters are a more dangerous and/or deluded lot, just as rabid George W. Bush supporters are. I'd know - I was once a rabid George W. Bush supporter.

Labeling someone Jewish, in a negative context, (whether clearly Jewish, or as in the case of Rupert Murdock, unclearly so) often tends, in my experience here, to be received, by some good members here, as a deliberate, unjustified and offensive incitement to outrage and slander on the large class of Jewish people. Pretty clearly your labeling Murdock as a "Man/Jew" was not entirely intended in a positive or even neutral light, especially given the juxtaposition with the image of Hitler doing the Nazi salute.

May I request, jackovesk, that you change "Man/Jew" to "Man/Zionist", or else explain the error(s) of my thinking?

(There is certainly at least one error in my thinking: Trying to persuade yourself to make a change to a post on the grounds of "political correctness" .)

Posted by Milneman (here)

Posted by Paul (here)

Posted by jackovesk (here)
PS - Which makes this (Man/Jew) the most Powerful/Influential voice on the planet..!!!

Posted by Milneman (here)
Jakov would you agree that these individuals are also part of this problem?

So far as I can tell, Rupert Murdock (media mogul over Fox News, et al) is clearly a Zionist, but not so clearly Jewish.

In our forum version of political correctness, I recommend using the words with the base of "Jew" to refer to a large class of some 13 million people, of widely varying sorts, though common faith and heritage, just as the word "Texan" refers to a similar large and diverse class of some 26 million people, of common location.

The consensus (so far as I am aware, and I think a reasonable consensus) on this forum is that such large classes of people are not, en masse, evil. Even though Ariel Sharon claimed to be Jewish, and George W. Bush claimed to be Texan, that doesn't (I hope) make all Jews or Texans as evil as those two.

(Feel free to substitute "Australian" for "Texan" above, a group of similar size, on ten times the land. No doubt you can recommend better than I who best fits the Australian example of George W. Bush.)

I recommend using words such as "Zionist" to refer to a smaller group of people who have adopted a strong pro-Israel nationalist view, where it seems likely that Israel is in considerable part a Rothschild creation, intended to sow the seeds of conflict in the Middle East. Rabid Zionist supporters are a more dangerous and/or deluded lot, just as rabid George W. Bush supporters are. I'd know - I was once a rabid George W. Bush supporter.

Labeling someone Jewish, in a negative context, (whether clearly Jewish, or as in the case of Rupert Murdock, unclearly so) often tends, in my experience here, to be received, by some good members here, as a deliberate, unjustified and offensive incitement to outrage and slander on the large class of Jewish people. Pretty clearly your labeling Murdock as a "Man/Jew" was not entirely intended in a positive or even neutral light, especially given the juxtaposition with the image of Hitler doing the Nazi salute.

May I request, jackovesk, that you change "Man/Jew" to "Man/Zionist", or else explain the error(s) of my thinking?

(There is certainly at least one error in my thinking: Trying to persuade yourself to make a change to a post on the grounds of "political correctness" .)

Thank you Paul!

By Christopher Bollyn – American Free Press

Christopher Bollyn is an investigative journalist who has written extensively on the events of September 11, 2001 in the Washington-based American Free Press. He has researched different aspects of the 9/11 attacks and uncovered facts and evidence that challenge the official version of events. tried to smear Bollyn as an “anti-Semite” in order to discredit him and diminish the significance of his work. At the helm of both organizations, the ADL and Fox News, is an Australian-born Zionist named Keith Rupert Murdoch.

Murdoch’s Deeply Hidden Jewish Roots — A Biography

Murdoch’s Jewish Roots

Murdoch “became an American citizen for business reasons,” according to Richard H. Curtiss, editor of the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs. Keith Rupert was born in Melbourne, Australia, on March 11, 1931. “Rupert’s father, Sir Keith Murdoch, was a newspaper publisher, and his mother an Orthodox Jew,” Curtiss wrote, “although Murdoch never offers that information in his biographies.”



Murdoch’s father married Elisabeth Joy Greene, daughter of Rupert Greene in 1928. They had one son, Keith Rupert and three daughters. Later in life, Keith Rupert chose to use Rupert, the first name of his Jewish maternal grandfather.



The young Keith Rupert was educated at Australia’s fashionable Geelong private school, and went on to the elitist and aristocratic Oxford University in England, according to Candour (UK) magazine.

“Rupert’s father Sir Keith Murdoch attained his prominent position in Australian society through a fortuitous marriage to the daughter of a wealthy Jewish family, née Elisabeth Joy Greene. Through his wife’s connections, Keith Murdoch was subsequently promoted from reporter to chairman of the British-owned newspaper where he worked. There was enough money to buy himself a knighthood of the British realm, two newspapers in Adelaide, South Australia, and a radio station in a faraway mining town,” Candour wrote in 1984. “For some reason, Murdoch has always tried to hide the fact that his pious mother brought him up as a Jew.”

While Murdoch may have “tried to hide” his Jewish roots, he has been quite forthright about his support for extreme right-wing Zionists, such as Benjamin Netanyahu and Ariel Sharon.

Netanyahu, who wrote a book entitled The War on Terror: How the West Can Win in 1986, is a frequent commentator on Murdoch’s Fox News.

Murdoch’s support for Zionism extremists is well known and a matter of record. As New York Governor George Pataki said, “There is no newspaper in the U.S. more supportive of Israel than the [Murdoch’s] New York Post.”

It is through a network of Zionist organizations, in which Murdoch plays a central role, that Murdoch is connected to the individuals who arranged the privatization – and obtained control of the World Trade Center – shortly before its destruction.

These key individuals are: Larry Silverstein and the former Israeli commando Frank Lowy, the lease holders of dubious repute who gained control of the WTC property six weeks before 9/11, and Port Authority Chairman Lewis M. Eisenberg, who authorized the transfer of the leases.

Murdoch belongs to, and has been honored by, a number of leading Zionist organizations in which Silverstein, Lowy, and Eisenberg all hold senior positions. These organizations include the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), the United Jewish Appeal (UJA), and the New York-based Museum of Jewish Heritage – A Living Memorial to the Holocaust.

Fifty days before 9/11, Silverstein Properties and Lowy’s Westfield America secured 99-year leases on the WTC. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey turned control of the World Trade Center over to the private hands of Silverstein and Lowy on July 24, 2001.

Silverstein and Lowy then took control of the 10.6 million-square-foot complex, which included the twin towers office buildings and two nine-story office buildings. Silverstein and the former Israeli commando Lowy then controlled all access to the World Trade Center.

Lowy leased the shopping concourse called the Mall at the World Trade Center, which comprised about 427,000 square feet of retail space.

“Six weeks before the WTC towers were destroyed, the Port Authority completed the process of leasing them for 99 years to Larry Silverstein, the developer who had built 7 World Trade Center [which mysteriously self-demolished at 5:25 p.m. on 9/11].

“Simultaneously, the retail space underneath the complex was leased to Westfield America, the US division of an Australian company that is one of the world’s largest operators of shopping malls.” Paul Goldberger wrote in New Yorker, May 20, 2002.

“Silverstein and Westfield were given the right to rebuild the structures if they were destroyed, and Westfield has the right to expand the retail space by 30 percent,” Goldberger wrote.

Silverstein is suing for some $7.2 billion in insurance money for the loss of the destroyed World Trade Center – and his expected earnings – for property he had leased with a down payment of $100 million – of borrowed funds.

Murdoch the Zionist

“Murdoch is a close friend of Ariel Sharon,” Sam Kiley, The Times (UK) veteran journalist on the Middle East wrote about the man who took over the once famous British paper. Kiley said Murdoch’s friendship with the Israeli prime minister had caused senior staff at the paper to rewrite important copy.

“Murdoch’s executives were so afraid of irritating him that, when I pulled off a little scoop of tracking down and photographing the unit in the Israeli army which killed Mohammed al-Durrah, the 12-year-old boy whose death was captured on film and became the iconic image of the conflict, I was asked to file the piece ‘without mentioning the dead kid.’” Kiley wrote. “After that conversation, I was left wordless, so I quit.”

Sharon and Murdoch are old friends. On Oct. 15, 1982, a month after the massacres of thousands of Palestinian refugees in the Sabra and Shatila camps of Beirut, war crimes which occurred under Sharon’s direct command, the Israeli defense minister held meetings with Rupert Murdoch and others, reportedly in order to advance his “West Bank real estate grab.”

The visit with Sharon included a trip for Murdoch and his editors from New York and London that “took them on a bird’s-eye tour of Israel aboard a helicopter gunship, flying over the Golan Heights, West Bank and settlements.”

“I have always believed in the future of Israel and the goals of the international Jewish community,” Murdoch said at a spring fund-raiser for the Museum of Jewish Heritage – A Living Memorial to the Holocaust on April 29, 2001.

From the beginning, News Corp., his global media company, “has been supportive of the Jewish national cause,” Murdoch said.

Larry Silverstein, who had not yet acquired the lease on the World Trade Center, attended the fund-raiser with Murdoch and reportedly said about museum chairman Robert Morgenthau’s plans to expand the museum: “I’ll support you…as long as you keep it under 110 stories.”

Murdoch and the ADL

“Henry Kissinger, Rupert Murdoch and Mortimer Zuckerman are on the [ADL] dinner committee,” according to a recent New York Times report on the ADL’s recent fund-raiser in which the controversial Italian prime minister Silvio Berlusconi received the ADL’s Distinguished Statesman Award.

Silverstein and Eisenberg have both held senior leadership positions with the United Jewish Appeal (UJA), a billion dollar Zionist “charity” organization, to which Murdoch and Lowy generously contribute. In 1997, Henry Kissinger presented Murdoch with the UJA’s award for “Humanitarian of the Year.”

Silverstein is a former chairman of UJA. This organization raises hundreds of millions of dollars every year for a network of Zionist agencies in the United States and Israel. Eisenberg, who was instrumental in obtaining the lease for Silverstein, is on the Planning Board of UJA.

Eisenberg in his role with the Port Authority was the key person who negotiated the 99-year leases for Silverstein and Frank Lowy’s Westfield America, who were in fact the low-bidders for the lease on the 110-story towers and the retail mall.

Murdoch and the Czechoslovakian-born Israeli commando Frank Lowy, a former fighter in Israel’s Golani Brigade, who emigrated to Australia in the 1950s, have had a long friendship, which Murdoch recounted during an American Australian Association fund-raising dinner in honor of Frank’s son, Peter S. Lowy, in New York on November 20, 2002. Larry Silverstein and his wife also attended the American Australian event.

Some reporters refer to the American Australian Association, whose membership includes James Wolfensohn, the president of the World Bank, who raised cash for Rupert Murdoch when he first expanded into the United States, as “the kangaroo mafia.”

“Frank was a brave and determined fighter,” Rafi Kocer, Lowy’s former commander, said. Lowy has donated some $350,000 to build a memorial museum in Israel for his former brigade.

Today, Lowy and his three sons control Westfield Corporation, one of the largest operators of shopping centers in the United States – and the world.

Insured Against Terrorist Attacks

On September 12, 2001, The Jerusalem Post reported: “Frank Lowy, who emigrated to Australia from Israel in 1952, owns the 99-year lease for the 425,000 square foot retail portion of the destroyed World Trade Center…Westfield said today that it has insurance cover against terrorist attacks and its earnings will not be materially affected.”

Lowy, is described by the Sydney Morning Herald as “a self-made man with a strong interest in the Holocaust and Israeli politics.”

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/07...s-a-biography/

PS - How about this then Paul..

Which makes this (Man/Jew/Zionist) the most Powerful/Influential voice on the planet..!!!

PSS - ((WRONG AGAIN!!!)) Milneman...

Posted by Milneman (here)

Thank you Paul!

That's ((2 Strikes)) now Milneman (((3 Strikes & You're Out)))..!!!

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by jackovesk (here)
PS - How about this then Paul..

Which makes this (Man/Jew/Zionist) the most Powerful/Influential voice on the planet..!!!

To quote what I wrote earlier:

Labeling someone Jewish, in a negative context, (whether clearly Jewish, or as in the case of Rupert Murdock, unclearly so) often tends, in my experience here, to be received, by some good members here, as a deliberate, unjustified and offensive incitement to outrage and slander on the large class of Jewish people.

I agree that Murdock may be Jewish. I realize that there are, as you quote, articles making an excellent case that he is Jewish.

The simple, unbiased, labeling of someone as Jewish is no more a problem than labeling those of us in Texas as Texans. It's just ordinary fact (or ordinary error, if they are not Jewish or Texan.)

But the "labeling someone Jewish, in a negative context" is using another, rather common, use of the word "Jewish". It's using it as an insult.

Surely you are well aware of this ... that that appellation of "Jewish" can be either a simple, ordinary fact or an insult.

And clearly, juxtaposing Murdock's image with that of Hitler, saluting in the direction of Murdock, puts that label "Jew" in a negative context.

This is not rocket science, Jackovesk. If what I write does not seem obvious to you, then I can only imagine that I have failed to present my clear and simple thoughts into equally clear and simple words.

===

It is an age old habit of the bastards in power to turn humans against each other - race against race, creed against creed, tribe against tribe, left against right, etc, etc.

Words of ordinary meaning are turned into words of insult, hatred, and division, justifying bloodshed and tyranny.

Let us not provide more support for that evil habit.

[jackovesk]

Posted by Paul (here)

Posted by jackovesk (here)
PS - How about this then Paul..

Which makes this (Man/Jew/Zionist) the most Powerful/Influential voice on the planet..!!!

To quote what I wrote earlier:

Labeling someone Jewish, in a negative context, (whether clearly Jewish, or as in the case of Rupert Murdock, unclearly so) often tends, in my experience here, to be received, by some good members here, as a deliberate, unjustified and offensive incitement to outrage and slander on the large class of Jewish people.

I agree that Murdock may be Jewish. I realize that there are, as you quote, articles making an excellent case that he is Jewish.

The simple, unbiased, labeling of someone as Jewish is no more a problem than labeling those of us in Texas as Texans. It's just ordinary fact (or ordinary error, if they are not Jewish or Texan.)

But the "labeling someone Jewish, in a negative context" is using another, rather common, use of the word "Jewish". It's using it as an insult.

Surely you are well aware of this ... that that appellation of "Jewish" can be either a simple, ordinary fact or an insult.

And clearly, juxtaposing Murdock's image with that of Hitler, saluting in the direction of Murdock, puts that label "Jew" in a negative context.

This is not rocket science, Jackovesk. If what I write does not seem obvious to you, then I can only imagine that I have failed to present my clear and simple thoughts into equally clear and simple words.

===

It is an age old habit of the bastards in power to turn humans against each other - race against race, creed against creed, tribe against tribe, left against right, etc, etc.

Words of ordinary meaning are turned into words of insult, hatred, and division, justifying bloodshed and tyranny.

Let us not provide more support for that evil habit.

Point taken...((However))...

(Political Correctness) I have no time whatsoever for...

I was simply pointing out the (FACTS)..!

And clearly, juxtaposing Murdock's image with that of Hitler, saluting in the direction of Murdock, puts that label "Jew" in a negative context.

My take on that is ((Entirely-Different)) to your "Assumption"...

The reason as to why I had Hitler-Saluting Murdoch was my way of metaphorically saying (Murdoch) is part Jewish which ((a lot of people are not aware of)) & he is the most ((Powerful)) Media Mogul on the planet and people ((Bow & Salute)) him as if he's the effing ((Fuhrer))...

There was absolutely no malice whatsoever pointed towards the Jewish people...

IMHO - Nobody has the right to ((OWN)) the word Jew/Jewish, etc...

But it "Does Seem" ((Every-Single-Time)) any reference to that 'Word' it's an effing ((CRIME))..!

Example:

In my country when the Greeks/Italians first came to Australia they were labeled (Wogs) but to alleviate the (Problem) the Greeks/Italians started to take ((Full Ownership)) of that word and turned the entire situation around in their favor...

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=WYht0GnOCK0

PS - I getting extremely tired of ((Yet Again)) having to explain myself on petty (PC) issues..!!!

[skuzzy]

video removed

[Atlas]

Posted by skuzzy (here)
video removed

Here it is:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=2Ppd09ATLaA

Posted by ghostrider (here)
also men in the middle east knowing War since birth , would never put a huge piece of artillery in wide open so it can be seen easily by aircraft , soldiers would go out of their way to conceal the location of such a weapon , it's combat 101 , concealment ...

Of course.

[Sith73]

ISIS is BS its just that simple The CIA creates bad guys in the world so it gives the powers that where a reason to go in and invade a country

[Snowflower]

Let me see - do I have this analogy right? So...someone beheads someone in Oklahoma. So, Putin decides that he needs to bomb the hell out of Oklahoma to stop the evil bastard that beheaded someone there. Eh?

Posted by Amzer Zo (here)
The Khorasans: As Fake As the Kardashians

Posted on September 25, 2014 by WashingtonsBlog

New Boogeyman Has Already Been Debunked

Obama is now – after the fact – scrambling to justify bombing the sovereign nation of Syria without the permission of either the Syrian government or even the United States Congress by saying that we were going after the super-evil Khorasans, who were about to attack us.

My God! That sounds terrifying … like a cross between Genghis Khan, Klingons and the Kardashians!

The U.S. is saying that they’re even more dangerous than ISIS.

There’s just one wee little problem … the Khorasan threat is as as fake as the Kardashians’ physiques. (Admittedly, it’s confusing, given that the Kardashians have also inserted themselves right in the middle of the Syrian conflict.)

Agence France-Presse reports:

[...]

Full article: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2014/...rdashians.html

[Hervé]

Thee speaketh sooth...

[Milneman]

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=8svvSqs7nbI

It's like the egg. Now you see it, now you don't.

[Camilo]

http://youtu.be/Jo8Xm46s62I

Publicado el 02/10/2014

Discussion of the book SHELL GAME: A Military Whistleblowing Report to the U.S. Congress Exposing the Betrayal and Cover-Up by the U.S. Government of the Union Bank of Switzerland-Terrorist Threat Finance Connection to Booz Allen Hamilton and U.S. Central Command

By 2LT Scott Bennett 11th Psychological Operations Battalion (retired)

Part of the reason behind Eric Holder's immediate retirement.

BACKGROUND OF SPEAKER:

Scott Bennett is a U.S. Army Special Operations Officer (11th Psychological Operations Battalion, Civil Affairs-Psychological Operations Command), and a global psychological warfare-counterterrorism analyst, formerly with defense contractor Booz Allen Hamilton.

He received a Direct Commission as an Officer, held a Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmentalized Information (TS/SCI) security clearance, and worked in the highest levels of international counterterrorism in Washington DC and MacDill Air Force Base in Tampa, Florida. He has worked at U.S. Special Operations Command, U.S. Central Command, the State Department Coordinator for Counterterrorism, and other government agencies. He served in the G.W. Bush Administration from 2003 to 2008, and was a Social Science Research Fellow at the Heritage Foundation. His writings and lectures seek to enhance global awareness and understanding of modern psychological warfare, the international intelligence.