EBOLA HOAX: Only First Few Cases Were Real - No Pictures from This Outbreak

[turiya]

Ebola - Only First Few Cases Were Real - No Pictures from This Outbreak

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Fbk-xPnjYwk

Published October 7 2014

From Koen Jacobs' Blog: http://truthsector.net/

turiya

[sheme]

If you wanted to take a photo of my loved one in death I guess I would tell you to go to hell. How about you?

¤=[Post Update]=¤

British national has died in Macedonia of suspected Ebola. BBC News

[turiya]

To Reiterate:

Video Title: "Only First Few Cases Were Real"

British national has died in Macedonia of suspected Ebola. BBC News

The Blogger suggests that "any death" could be attributed to Ebola, now.

Sorry for your loss.

[TargeT]

Posted by turiya (here)

Ebola - Only First Few Cases Were Real - No Pictures from This Outbreak

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Fbk-xPnjYwk

From Koen Jacobs' Blog: http://truthsector.net/

turiya

This makes a lot of sense.

Tons of fear hype, little to possibly NO actual cases present (we only know of one that is very likely true in the US).

the CDC owns the patents to the 6 ebola virus strains in Africa, big pharma is already pumping out "drugs" and vaccines will follow (and be heavily subsidized by our government, as always).

Another False Flag event that's mostly false with only a touch of flag (haha).

[Matt P]

Posted by sheme (here)
If you wanted to take a photo of my loved one in death I guess I would tell you to go to hell. How about you?

¤=[Post Update]=¤

British national has died in Macedonia of suspected Ebola. BBC News

I'm not commenting on the theory of the video post. Two things about your comment, though. First, no, I wouldn't be into someone taking photos of my dying loved one BUT if one of my loved ones was dying of something that I *believed* was of worldwide significance and a photo could help save peoples' lives, darn tootin I'd let a photo be taken. I would WANT other people to know. As many people who have phones/cameras now, too, I would guess we would be overwhelmed with photo records of what was happening. Two, you are referencing the BBC. Knowing the history of these faked pandemics and the history of the BBC should inspire caution when using them as sources. This is the same BBC that lied about 7/7, 9/11 (especially building 7), many other false flags and lies on a daily basis to reinforce the fake reality control matrix and to empower those that profit from their lies. For that matter, nothing should be trusted on this issue by ANY mainstream media outlet, the NIH or the CDC (especially the CDC) or any medical mafia organization.
How many false flags have been pushed on us the past few years? Just sayin...

Matt

[Atlas]

Oops! Mainstream media

[TargeT]

3 different news agencies with GROSS mistakes.... makes a lot of sense when you consider that all news agencies receive info from the same sources for big stories...

Posted by buares (here)
Oops! Mainstream media

WOOPS "CIA" most likely...

[turiya]

The World Health Organization (WHO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations (UN) that is concerned with international public health. But is it an agency that anybody can really trust???

Anybody remember when HIV/AIDS virus hit the media in the 1980s?
Remember what the so-called experts were saying, that it came from an African Green Monkey...

What was the World Health Organization's (WHO) involvement in all of that???

I think Louis Farrakhan remembers quite well what was going on back then...

You Trust Your Enemy Too Much!!!

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=UkQROHvPqEM

Back-up by Leonard Horowitz:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=l91ZBUYsRWU

And, Placing an Absolute Nail in the Coffin
by Dr Robert Strecker with
The Strecker Memorandum

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=fevYSHQoeD4

1986 videotape by Dr. Robert Strecker

This is the most controversial video you'll ever see. Dr. Robert Strecker refutes, with documented evidence, virtually everything the so-called experts and government reports have told you about AIDS. He asserts in no uncertain terms that:

* AIDS is a man-made disease
* AIDS is not a homosexual disease
* AIDS is not a venereal disease
* AIDS can be carried by mosquitos
* There will never be a vaccine

Although decades have passed and untold billions have been spent in research, cancer is still with us, the second major cause of death in America. The most dreaded fear that all oncologists (cancer doctors), virologists and immunologists live with is that someday cancer in one form or another will become a contagious disease, transferable from one person to another.

AIDS has now made that fear a reality, and if you think you're safe because you're not gay or promiscuous, or because you're not sexually active, then you had better watch this video very carefully until you fully understand what Dr. Strecker is telling you as he takes you step by step and shows you how this dreaded disease was actually man-made. Condoms can't prevent it and there won't ever be a vaccine. Dr. Strecker shows how AIDS was predicted, requested, created, deployed and works very well!

Dr. Robert B. Strecker is a practicing Internist and Gastroenterologist. In addition, he holds a Ph.D. in Pharmacology and is a trained Pathologist.

[Frederick Jackson]

That AIDS has nothing to do with male homosexual practices? I don't think so. I met one of the first cases of AIDS in the US in 1980 or thereabouts. He was a good looking gay man in his late thirties or maybe early forties who was a scientist and a tropical grass specialist with the Smithsonian Institute in Washington, DC. He had recently gained fame for his discovery of the life cycle of bamboo, which was a mystery to most of the world. He had recently come back from working in Africa and he was dying and he did not know why. He was never diagnosed. He died without knowing what was killing him.

[bruno dante]

TargeT, can you please elaborate on the CDC owning the patents to Ebola? What exactly does that mean?

It appears I need an education here.

Thanks man.

[turiya]

National Security Study Memorandum 200
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests (NSSM200) was completed on December 10, 1974 by the United States National Security Council under the direction of Henry Kissinger.

It was adopted as official U.S. policy by President Gerald Ford in November 1975. It was originally classified, but was later declassified and obtained by researchers in the early 1990s.

Findings

The basic thesis of the memorandum was that population growth in the least developed countries (LDCs) is a concern to U.S. national security, because it would tend to risk civil unrest and political instability in countries that had a high potential for economic development. The policy gives "paramount importance" to population control measures and the promotion of contraception among 13 populous countries. This is to control rapid population growth which the US deems inimical to the socio-political and economic growth of these countries and to the national interests of the United States, since the "U.S. economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad", and these countries can produce destabilizing opposition forces against the United States.

It recommends that US leadership "influence national leaders" and that "improved world-wide support for population-related efforts should be sought through increased emphasis on mass media and other population education and motivation programs by the U.N., USIA, and USAID."

Named countries

Thirteen countries are named in the report as particularly problematic with respect to U.S. security interests: India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, Turkey, Nigeria, Egypt, Ethiopia [think Africa, here], Mexico, Colombia, and Brazil. These countries are projected to create 47 percent of all world population growth.

The report advocates the promotion of education and contraception and other population control measures, stating for instance that "No country has reduced its population growth without resorting to abortion".

It also raises the question of whether the U.S. should consider preferential allocation of surplus food supplies to states that are deemed constructive in use of population control measures.

Key insights

Some of the key insights of report are controversial:

"The U.S. economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less developed countries [see National Commission on Materials Policy, Towards a National Materials Policy: Basic Data and Issues, April 1972]. That fact gives the U.S. enhanced interest in the political, economic, and social stability of the supplying countries. Wherever a lessening of population pressures through reduced birth rates can increase the prospects for such stability, population policy becomes relevant to resource supplies and to the economic interests of the United States. . . . The location of known reserves of higher grade ores of most minerals favors increasing dependence of all industrialized regions on imports from less developed countries. The real problems of mineral supplies lie, not in basic physical sufficiency, but in the politico-economic issues of access, terms for exploration and exploitation, and division of the benefits among producers, consumers, and host country governments" [Chapter III-Minerals and Fuel].

"Whether through government action, labor conflicts, sabotage, or civil disturbance, the smooth flow of needed materials will be jeopardized. Although population pressure is obviously not the only factor involved, these types of frustrations are much less likely under conditions of slow or zero population growth" [Chapter III-Minerals and Fuel].

"Populations with a high proportion of growth. The young people, who are in much higher proportions in many LDCs, are likely to be more volatile, unstable, prone to extremes, alienation and violence than an older population. These young people can more readily be persuaded to attack the legal institutions of the government or real property of the ‘establishment,' ‘imperialists,' multinational corporations, or other-often foreign-influences blamed for their troubles" [Chapter V, "Implications of Population Pressures for National Security].

"We must take care that our activities should not give the appearance to the LDCs of an industrialized country policy directed against the LDCs. Caution must be taken that in any approaches in this field we support in the LDCs are ones we can support within this country. "Third World" leaders should be in the forefront and obtain the credit for successful programs. In this context it is important to demonstrate to LDC leaders that such family planning programs have worked and can work within a reasonable period of time." [Chapter I, World Demographic Trends]

The report advises, "In these sensitive relations, however, it is important in style as well as substance to avoid the appearance of coercion."


Abortion as a geopolitical strategy is mentioned several dozen times in the report with suggestive implications. These are some of the lines:

"No country has reduced its population growth without resorting to abortion."

"...under developing country conditions foresight methods not only are frequently unavailable but often fail because of ignorance, lack of preparation, misuse and non-use. Because of these latter conditions, increasing numbers of women in the developing world have been resorting to abortion..."

SOURCE

[turiya]

World Health Organization says using untested drugs and vaccines ethical during Ebola outbreak

August 13, 2014

The World Health Organization declared Tuesday that it is ethical to use untested drugs and vaccines in the ongoing Ebola outbreak in West Africa...
There is no proven treatment or vaccine for Ebola; several are in early stages of development. ZMapp, made by Mapp Pharmaceuticals, is so new that it has never been tested in humans, although an early version worked in some monkeys infected with Ebola. It's aimed at boosting the immune system's efforts to fight off Ebola....

The WHO said the size of the outbreak -- the first in West Africa -- made the experimental use of drugs ethical even though there is no evidence they work and it is possible they could be dangerous.
SOURCE

[TargeT]

Posted by bruno dante (here)
TargeT, can you please elaborate on the CDC owning the patents to Ebola? What exactly does that mean?

It appears I need an education here.

Thanks man.

On it's own it's actually not that big of a deal, here's the ofical line on the patent ownership:

the government patents viruses and other disease-causing microbes to make sure the pathogens remain available for research purposes in the public domain. If a private company held the patents, it could potentially hold onto pathogens or charge licensing fees that would stifle research to find treatments.
The CDC does hold some patents on life forms, but it generally does this for the common good, so a commercial company can’t come along and patent it

Which seems completely legit, by itself with nothing else along side it. (plus they do not own the patent to the strain that is currently being blamed for deaths, the Ziare strain)


but this:

he CDC says that in the event of an Ebola outbreak in the U.S., bodies of the deceased would be required to be buried within "hermetically sealed caskets", which would prevent the escape of microbes during funerals. An administrator of the Dallas Institute Of Funeral Service interviewed in the article states that he has never come across any such caskets in his industry, meaning, hermetically sealed coffins are NOT common in the slightest for burial. The CDC coffins in Madison, Georgia, though, ARE designed to prevent spread of infection. In fact, the patent for these coffins confirms that they are meant for the burial or cremation of bodies exposed to infectious diseases. You can read the patent here:

https://www.scribd.com/doc/17690179/...-Container-For

This would suggest that the CDC has stockpiled such coffins in places like Madison, Georgia specifically in preparation for a viral outbreak.

Meaning, the CDC has been expecting the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans due to infection for at least the past six years.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=1FnZLx8J4oM

That is a LONG period of preparation. Such preparation requires certainty, not hypothesis, especially were the federal government is involved. Our government was so certain of a viral catastrophe they purchased fields full of sealing coffins to be ready for it; not to prevent it, but to have the means to clean up after it.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-1...a-fema-coffins


and this:

An Ebola Outbreak Would Be Advantageous For Globalists
t's sad to say with such finality, but a universal fact of existence is that most of the people you meet in this life are fundamentally and functionally ignorant. Not necessarily stupid, but certainly ignorant. Ignorance comes not from a lack of intelligence, but from a denial of knowledge and truth. That is to say, ignorance takes hold when people decide to act as though they know and understand a thing, even if they do not. Ignorance prevails when a society or nation chooses to value the appearance of expertise, to value the theater of overconfidence, and to cheer for the bluster of morons rather than admit that they have unanswered questions on subjects they do not yet grasp. For nothing is worse for the self absorbed than to acknowledge that they do not know.
Entire nations have fallen throughout history because of this terrible weakness...

By extension, such ignorance is not just an inherent disease but also an easily exploitable disease. When we refuse to think critically and examine our surroundings thoroughly, we become like grazing gazelles oblivious to the predators encircling us in the tall grass. And, just as there are predatory individuals that hide amongst us, there are are also predatory oligarchs that camouflage themselves as benevolent politicos and financial professionals standing above us. Normal predators we fear, establishment predators we invite into our homes as protectors, saviors, and partners.

The disease of ignorance leaves us vulnerable to many other plagues, including literal plagues like the Ebola virus. When we take the establishment at its word concerning the threat of Ebola outbreak, we make ourselves vulnerable. When people assume that the worst could never happen to them, history shows us that it inevitably does.

The recent discovery of an Ebola infected patient in Dallas, Texas has led to reasonable concern from the general population, but mainstream media efforts along with CDC and White House spin have subdued any practical response by the citizenry. The constant droning voice of the establishment claims there is nothing to be worried about; that even if there was an outbreak in the U.S., it would be quickly squashed by highly prepared medical response teams.

First and foremost, the existence of just one Ebola infected person within America's borders indicates a likelihood of others, or the possibility of others in the near future unless policies and procedures are changed. As far as I can tell, the government has no intention of introducing rational fail-safes such as requiring mandatory quarantine for those seeking to reenter the U.S. from known outbreak regions, shutting down unrestricted travel into the country from countries with Ebola, training hospitals properly in the identification of the disease, or committing mass resources to quelling Ebola in hot zones before it reaches our shores, at least not in time to make a difference.

Secondly, the establishment also has no intention of giving the general public accurate information as to the behavior and dangers of Ebola. Those I have spoken with in the medical field including some who work within major city hospitals have related to me that the CDC has not been honest in its assessment of the probability of outbreak. For example, the CDC is consistently reminding the public that Ebola is not an “airborn” disease, and this is technically true as far as the science indicates. However, they forget to mention that it is indeed a “droplet born” disease, meaning, it can travel through the air carried in an infected cough or sneeze. The tight quarters of an airplane make for a perfect petri dish, with droplets and particulates passing back and forth through the same space and oxygen for hours at a time. The spread of Ebola is nowhere near as containable as the CDC claims.

I have been told that most hospitals are completely unprepared to fend off an outbreak of a virus as destructive as Ebola. Little to no standardized training has taken place, and some facilities are only now putting together a list of emergency procedures. Human error within the chain of care also occurs often, as we saw in Dallas, Texas, and these errors can lead to greater infection in a hospital environment.

CDC and WHO efforts in countries like Liberia have been so ineffective and halfhearted it leads one to question why their budgets are in the billions of dollars? Where is all their capital and their resources going if not to bring an unprecedented hammer down on a clearly dangerous outbreak of Ebola? Why is the virus being allowed to flourish rather than being destroyed right where it started? Where has the full force of the CDC been for the past several months while death gestates in Africa?

The one legitimate function of government, any government, is to protect the right of the people to pursue their own life, liberty, and happiness. I think stopping the invasion of mortal viruses would fall into this category. The one job our government is MANDATED to do, and it refuses to do it. Why?

I have made the point many times in the past and I'll make it here again; when a catastrophe takes place, or a crisis is imminent, ask yourself, who ultimately benefits? I believe that the lack of strong prevention response from our government, an inadequacy which is obvious to all of the health care workers I have talked with and to anyone who has the sense to do their own research, could be absolutely deliberate. I believe the spread of Ebola may be desired by certain power brokers, and here is why:

The Perfect Cover Event

I have been warning for quite some time that the banking establishment in particular is well aware that an economic collapse of incredible proportions is coming. In fact, they have done everything in their power to make one possible. This collapse, according to my research, is designed to clear the way through monetary carpet bombing for a new international Bretton Woods-style agreement which will plant the foundation of a truly global economic system centralized and controlled by a highly select few elites. Needless to say, the internationalists would prefer not to take the blame for such a calamity.

Regional or widespread war, terrorism, cyber attacks, etc, are all useful vehicles to conjure mass confusion, and can also be used as scapegoats for the eventual downfall of our economy. That said, a viral pandemic truly surpasses them all in effectiveness. All other tragedies could easily be tied to the first “domino” or “linchpin” (as Rand Corporation calls it) of Ebola transmission, but the strategy goes deeper than this...

An Act Of Nature

Even though most people are well aware of the fact that governments have been engineering biological weapons for decades, few people think political leadership would ever use them at all, let alone use them on the people they are tasked to protect. Even with the complacency and inaction of our government in terms of the response to Ebola, the general assumption by most of the American population will be that any viral outbreak is a product of nature, not of men.

Acts of nature are not things that the common man can easily rebel against. People rebel against governments and corrupt despots all the time, but not the plague. If a viral pandemic strikes, nearly everything a government does after the fact, no matter how corrupt or destructive, can be rationalized as necessary for the greater good of the greater number. If anyone does rebel, they will be labeled as pure evil, for they are now disrupting the government's ability to stop the pandemic from spreading, and thus, are partly responsible for the mass deaths that follow.

During a viral outbreak, government becomes mother, father, nurse and protector. No matter how abusive they are, most people will still look to them for safety and guidance, primarily because they have no knowledge of disease. What they do not understand, they will fear, and fear always drives the ignorant into the arms of tyrants. One should also take into consideration the fact that most globalists lean towards the ideology of eugenics and promote the concept of population reduction. A pandemic would fulfill this desire nicely...

Rationalized Economic Collapse

Who would question the event of an economic collapse in the wake of an Ebola soaked nightmare? Who would want to buy or sell? Who would want to come in contact with strangers to generate a transaction? Who would even leave their house? Ebola treatment in first world nations has advantages of finance and a cleaner overall health environment, but what if economic downturn happens simultaneously? America could experience third world status very quickly, and with it, all the unsanitary conditions that result in an exponential Ebola death rate.

The treasury, labor department, and private Federal Reserve have gone to vast lengths to skew statistics and rig markets with trillions in fiat dollars. Despite historic numbers of Americans falling off unemployment rolls, imploding shipping and manufacturing statistics, and the U.S. teetering on the edge of global “de-dollarization”, a large portion of the citizenry has been led to believe that economic recovery is assured. What they do not understand is that fiscal implosion is unavoidable, and the whole bull market is a circus designed to distract.

Amidst even a moderate or controlled viral scenario, stocks and bonds will undoubtedly crash, a crash that was going to happen anyway. The international banks who created the mess get off blameless, while Ebola, an act of nature, becomes the ultimate scapegoat for every disaster that follows.

Rationalized Travel Restrictions

If you want to lock down the movement of a population to prevent the spread of dissenting groups or ideas, I can't think of a better way than to claim it is to prevent the spread of a deadly virus. Our government and world health officials are approaching Ebola with an attitude of nonchalance right now, because prevention is NOT part of the plan. When Ebola strikes hard within our country, that is when they will finally decide that strict measures are needed. Suddenly, those borders that they could never secure before will become impassable for you and I. And traveling between states or perhaps even counties may be extraordinarily difficult. “Papers please...” will become the new mantra of petty authority.

Forced Health Measures

Do not be surprised if an Ebola vaccine of some kind suddenly appears on the market just as the situation begins to turn tragic. And, do not be surprised if said vaccine is a total sham that ends up making more people sick. Expect that forced vaccinations will take place, especially as a prerequisite for receiving treatment from CDC or FEMA hazmat facilities. Expect that these facilities will become nothing more than obscure prisons for the sick where people quietly die. Expect that every American will be required to be tested and screened, with biometric data carefully stored, beginning with airport travel (once the virus is already entrenched). The options are endless for abuse in terms of totalitarian health laws when the public thinks they could end up bleeding from every orifice and dying of liver failure.

Rationalized Martial Law

Imagine if some Americans decide they don't like being poked, prodded, tagged and bagged by the establishment. Imagine they decide to fight back, Ebola be damned. An already uphill battle becomes an epic struggle when a large percentage of the population thinks you are a monster that wants to hasten the spread of Ebola. Not that the ignorant count for much in the grand scheme of history, but waking at least some of them up in the future to the bigger threat (the globalists) is hard to do when all they can see is devilish microbes. Those who plan to combat the rise of the internationalists, as I plan to, should accept now the likelihood that the only people we will have on our side tomorrow are the people we have been able to wake up today. Martial law will be welcomed by the rest.

International Response

An international response is almost guaranteed during a major pandemic. Sovereignty will be tossed in the dirt. UN and WHO teams and perhaps even troops could accompany an aid package to the U.S. Think of the glorious propaganda, as globalists tell stories of how they “saved humanity” by surpassing the barbaric practices of national and individual sovereignty, defeated the Ebola virus (after millions of deaths, of course), and out of the ashes, the “phoenix” of global governance was born. If they succeed, imagine what the history books will say for the next several centuries.

What Do We Do?

There are no silver bullet solutions. There never have been and there never will be. People looking for them will be sorely disappointed and ill prepared after wasting so much time searching for an easy out. The only answer is for communities of people to take their own survival into their own hands and become as self sufficient as possible. This means that neighborhoods, towns, and counties will have to take precautions now to steel themselves for a pandemic event, instead of simply sitting on their hands and expecting government officials to save them.

The treatments for Ebola in most cases involve nothing more than the steady replacement of vital fluids, electrolytes and plasma until the patient's body can build up an immunity to the virus. Those with stronger immune systems before contraction are more likely to survive and beat back the disease. Government care, for the most part, is NOT going to save many people either way. That is to say, your survival will depend on you and your immune system, not them. Communities that make efforts to prevent contact and that strengthen individual immunity will have a better chance of survival than going into any government run hazmat facility. Government is not needed, and will often end up being more of a threat than the virus itself. Groups I work closely with and talk with, many with their own doctors and nurses, are already setting prevention guidelines in motion.

If you can prove you don't need the system to save you, their rationale for attempting to control you is weakened. The ignorant will still try to demonize us for our efforts, but self sufficiency is all we have in the face of this kind of storm. If we can lead by example with our own successful health standards while saving people where the establishment could not, perhaps we can turn the tide.

http://www.alt-market.com/articles/2...for-globalists

Certainly do raise some questions:

Is it happening at all?

Is it actually happening and being purposefully allowed (or forced) to become worse?

I think we need to take this in context of the last 100 years of media... this topic is either being SUPPRESSED by the MSM or EXAGGERATED (right now I'm leaning to exaggeration as the media is "all a flurry" with ebola stories and they are all pretty dark and fearsome)

[Sidney]

The only thing that would tie AIDS to gay men, is anal sex. Anybody wonder why that practice became an obsession within all sexually active people. It was advertised via porn/media. That could get into a whole other conversation which I will refrain from.

Biologically speaking the virus targeted anally sexually HUMANS because the small tears in that area of the body allowed it to get into the bloodstream (easier) that other means of entry.

AIDS was made to appear to be a gay mans disease, because TPTB and the MACHINE planned it that way , so people would refrain from learning that African population was the real target .

Same as LYME disease, which is advertised through the media to be cause by a tick bite. When in fact LYME is also spread via saliva, sexual contact, many insects OTHER that ticks, and even tears,, etc.

Too bad that the masses tend to think the way they are programmed to think. Getting to the real truths of these matters is a full time job. But we do know, and must not forget ever, is TPTB are motivated by money, and depopulation, and control agendas regardless of whatever the current crisis may be.

I am wondering, where are all these thousands of bodies in AFRICA. That would certainly be quite a dramatic shot for a journalist and would get lots of attention. Obviously (imo) ebola started at the BIO lab in Africa. And people have died. And the US UN CDC and all the others are being extremely negligent to allow all this travel, again, this is clearly by design.
So, ebola is either ramping up for mass epidemic, or it is really not as bad as the media would like us to think.

Is the whole thing a HOAX? It depends on each individual definition of a HOAX and with the defition of the word itself, leaves a LOT of grey area.

Ebola is not a hoax, because it is a very real disease. But if it is being used, and falsely represented in order to fulfill an agenda, (besides of course to sicken and kill a population) well then of course the agenda itself would be the hoax, if you want to get technical.

Also, if you want to know what someone is going to do in a certain situation, look at their history. And IMHO, the media and world governments has a very long history of over exaggerating epidemics.




hoax:
1. An act intended to deceive or trick.
2. Something that has been established or accepted by fraudulent means.
tr.v. hoaxed, hoax·ing, hoax·es
To deceive or cheat by using a hoax.

[TargeT]

Posted by Sidney (here)
Ebola is not a hoax, because it is a very real disease. But if it is being used, and falsely represented in order to fulfill an agenda, (besides of course to sicken and kill a population) well then of course the agenda itself would be the hoax, if you want to get technical.

Also, if you want to know what someone is going to do in a certain situation, look at their history. And IMHO, the media and world governments has a very long history of over exaggerating epidemics.

hoax:
1. An act intended to deceive or trick.
2. Something that has been established or accepted by fraudulent means.
tr.v. hoaxed, hoax·ing, hoax·es
To deceive or cheat by using a hoax.

Yes, for accuracy I would have chosen a title like "the ebola EPIDEMIC HOAX " or something similar... we need to clear up these small technicalities so when people make a judgement based on a title (aka cover of the book) it will accurately reflect the intent of the whole message.


Time will tell on this and I hope people do pay attention to the "chicken littles", unfortunately if this is an "epidemic hoax" then it is also a very real discernment test. (and likewise if I am wrong then I need to correct my thinking in this) However I strongly feel this is an over exaggerated, possibly nearly non-existent (currently) situation.

The problem is this: if the fear becomes of a sufficient level then drastic actions can be taken in the name of "safety" and this can go from a nothing-really-going-on situation to a much darker situation... Vaccines are SUCH a beautiful way to introduce that which is not already there......... Think of a significant ebola vaccine push where the live virus is "accidentally" (purposefully of course...) introduced; even those that avoid the vaccine would be at SERIOUS risk.

This is the situation I see on the table before us, if we continue down the fear and panic path, buying into these nearly completely baseless and "proofless" stories that are flooding out of the MSM the less discernible of the population will be swept up in the group think and we will be offering ourselfs to the "government saviors" before we actually have concrete knowledge of what is going on.


"No ebola in the vaccine" ... Human trials for a vaccine are already coming it appears.
http://www.kcci.com/news/iowa-compan...tests/29018732

I'd be interested to do some digging on this "vaccine" company: http://investors.linkp.com/directors.cfm http://www.newlinkgenetics.com/executive-management

[Sidney]

Posted by TargeT (here)

Posted by Sidney (here)
Ebola is not a hoax, because it is a very real disease. But if it is being used, and falsely represented in order to fulfill an agenda, (besides of course to sicken and kill a population) well then of course the agenda itself would be the hoax, if you want to get technical.

Also, if you want to know what someone is going to do in a certain situation, look at their history. And IMHO, the media and world governments has a very long history of over exaggerating epidemics.

hoax:
1. An act intended to deceive or trick.
2. Something that has been established or accepted by fraudulent means.
tr.v. hoaxed, hoax·ing, hoax·es
To deceive or cheat by using a hoax.

Yes, for accuracy I would have chosen a title like "the ebola EPIDEMIC HOAX " or something similar... we need to clear up these small technicalities so when people make a judgement based on a title (aka cover of the book) it will accurately reflect the intent of the whole message.


Time will tell on this and I hope people do pay attention to the "chicken littles", unfortunately if this is an "epidemic hoax" then it is also a very real discernment test. (and likewise if I am wrong then I need to correct my thinking in this) However I strongly feel this is an over exaggerated, possibly nearly non-existent (currently) situation.

The problem is this: if the fear becomes of a sufficient level then drastic actions can be taken in the name of "safety" and this can go from a nothing-really-going-on situation to a much darker situation... Vaccines are SUCH a beautiful way to introduce that which is not already there......... Think of a significant ebola vaccine push where the live virus is "accidentally" (purposefully of course...) introduced; even those that avoid the vaccine would be at SERIOUS risk.

This is the situation I see on the table before us, if we continue down the fear and panic path, buying into these nearly completely baseless and "proofless" stories that are flooding out of the MSM the less discernible of the population will be swept up in the group think and we will be offering ourselfs to the "government saviors" before we actually have concrete knowledge of what is going on.


"No ebola in the vaccine" ... Human trials for a vaccine are already coming it appears.
http://www.kcci.com/news/iowa-compan...tests/29018732

I'd be interested to do some digging on this "vaccine" company: http://investors.linkp.com/directors.cfm http://www.newlinkgenetics.com/executive-management

, Well, just a quick look at New Link Genetics, one of the board members, Director
Joseph Saluri has served as a member of our Board of Directors since May 2010. Mr. Saluri has served as Vice President and General Counsel for Stine Seed Company and its affiliates since July 1999. As part of his duties for Stine, he works to establish collaborative licensing, research and marketing alliances with international biotechnology and agribusiness companies, in addition to managing the legal and intellectual property affairs for the Stine Companies. Previous to his employment with Stine, Mr. Saluri was an attorney and solicitor at law with Nicholas Critelli Associates, PC, in Des Moines and London. Mr. Saluri received a B.S./B.A. from Drake University and a J.D. from Drake University Law School.

If you google Stine Seed, you will find very close knit relationship with GUESS WHO, Monsanto. So, for me that is a red flag right off the bat.

[TargeT]

The FEARFEST is in FULL SWING!

Look at this ridiculousness... Tiptoetotalitarianism in full effect...

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=LJhWVsx1U8c

[jackovesk]

Posted by TargeT (here)
The FEARFEST is in FULL SWING!

Look at this ridiculousness... Tiptoetotalitarianism in full effect...

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=LJhWVsx1U8c

Certainly is TargeT...

Illuminati Ebola Virus:

• Center For Disease Control Confirms
• First Ebola Virus Case In USA, Can We Trust The CDC When They
• Gave The Zombie Preparedness
• Guide To The American People? No.

The CDC Zombie Pandemic Guide



[CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE CENTER FOR DISEASE CONTROL'S ZOMBIE PANDEMIC PREPAREDNESS 101 GUIDE]

Illuminati Shriner Hospitals:

• Trying To Make Devil Worshippers
• Look Good Instead of Evil.
• Do Not Be Fooled By Them.

PS - IMHO - Here is my ((EBOLA ((EPIDEMIC)) SUMMARY))

Just plain old ((FEARMONGERING))...

...Or

• Have you seen what's on the ((Georgia Guidestones))
• Planned a Long-Long time ago
• Modified 'Ebola Strain' with 'Cure' for 'Those in the Know'
• Big PHARMA set to make $Billions through sheer GREED
• Set-Off to Coincide with all the other ((Mayhem))
• Pre-Planned Depopulation of AFRICA
• Ect, etc...

The NWO ((WANKERS)) are becoming all so ((OBVIOUS)) these days which will ultimately lead to their ((UNDOING))...

[TargeT]

I'd say the Fear campaign (based on Twitter) is 100% successful in the US.... are you "infected" with it?







Nursing staff resign from their posts to avoid treating Ebola cases
http://elpais.com/elpais/2014/10/09/...32_008226.html

[KiwiElf]

Compulsory vaccines, made by Bill Gates, just around the corner? Glad to see India is suing him for the damage his vaccines have caused there!