THE HOT ZONE : A chilling 1995 book about Ebola

[Matt P]

The elite/cabal/zionists/whatever you want to call them have been weaponizing viruses and just about anything else for decades so, yeah, no surprises here. You might say the world's food supply has been weaponized, too, which is why a majority of the world population is vulnerable and, therefore, fearful. It's why every new manufactured "bug" that comes our way works folks into such a frenzy. Sick, acidic people fear viruses, though they don't understand the connection (by design because the truth is banned). Like other areas of truth, we've forgotten what a strong immune system is and how to get it and keep it. We've forgotten and/or ignored the seemingly unconnected influences that have been forced on us that have made us vulnerable (fluoride, vaccines, gmo's, acidic foods, etc). This information is really never included when people talk about these events.
The human body is a magnificent virus busting machine. Ebola is not the factor that creates the conditions for infection. A body out of balance and acidic is what creates infection. Interior terrain is the key, not the virus of the month, whether weaponized or not.
There are many professionals who write and speak of this. One I know who has remained consistent for many years is Dr. Robert O Young of the pH Miracle. Here is a very brief perspective from him: http://articlesofhealth.blogspot.com...be-feared.html
Don't let the last part of the link confuse you. The article title has a question mark after "feared." This is not his comprehensive analysis, just a primer. If you want more, you'll have to want to find it (like anything else). I'm not your path across the river or the perfect authority.
If you want to move from fear to knowing to confident calm, study alkalinity and how to get there. There is lots of information right here on this site for strengthening your immune system and alkalizing your blood. Find what Dr. Young has to say about polymorphism.
I don't fear ebola. I am concerned about man's response to it based on what I see and read....everywhere. People are not armed with what they should be armed with and when you respond to this from a place of fear or unknowing, you are feeding those in power, quite literally. Don't worry about whether it's airborne or not. This is irrelevant. If this gets really bad, people will need to see that some people are calm, not infected and have truly life saving information. Don't run with the herd. Be their light out of the darkness.

Matt

[Hervé]

Already posted in other threads but, IMO, worth repeating:

The vultures have been in the "ready" for a long while awaiting a good crisis to not let get by:

Rockefeller Foundation's own predictive scenario of what "could" happen:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=aEvYdNP2unk

... and a PDF of said document: http://www.rockefellerfoundation.org...eb007cc719.pdf



Put that together with that little snippet:

Posted by Amzer Zo (here)
The followings from Sue Arrigo's case 26 "Your sickness and genocide" exposes what's occurring around the world, from Fukushima to the various type of diabetes tied to hypothyroidism, directly from the horse's mouth:

[...]... In my report to Tenet, I stated that this was a crime against humanity which was being perpetuated on a daily basis. After he read my report, I asked him what he was going to do about all those crimes against humanity, as each new germ represented one. He hemmed and hawed and then offered lamely that he was not the one making the decision. I asked him who was. He did not answer that question directly. He said, “Well, you can come with me to the next Presidential briefing in the morning and discuss it with Bush, if you think that it will do any good.”

I doubted it would do any good, but in the interests of thoroughness I did it anyway. I took with me a large stake of my report. My report was over 225 pages with a couple hundred pages of supporting documents. So, each report was almost a ream width of paper. I put 10 of them in a box to take with me. Both Cheney and Bush were at that Presidential briefing that morning. And Rice was called into it when I started giving my briefing on the poor quality of the research done at the BioWarfare Labs. At the end of my almost 12 minutes, I concluded with my recommendation that all the labs be closed down.

Bush, Jr. said to me, “We wanted to know how to make the research more effective. What are your recommendations to do that?”

I asked him, “More effective in what way?” That was a loaded question because they did not want to come out and say in front of the many foreign bugs likely to be in the Oval Office, “At killing off most of the people in the world so we can have all the resources of the planet for just our own children.” So, there was a brief uncomfortable silence.

Then Cheney said, “You know what we want. What do we have to do to get the level of science up to be able to accomplish it?”

I started off on the tangent of how to make the research safe enough to even do and recommended tongue in cheek that it at least be moved off shore to join their investments. Rice laughed at that. The others did not. They wanted the BioWarfare Labs on US soil to be able to claim an accidental release when one was intentional. That suggested to me that Rice was not as close into the loop on the actual agenda as the others.

Cheney then said to me “Just get to the point and tell us what needs to be done to get the kill ratios up to usable to immobilize a whole population.”

[...]

... and one would get the point... I guess.

[Agape]

Thanks Bill , it's a fascinating topic . I only wish that some followers of the conspiracy theory where this and other viruses and bacteria , and fungi are concerned realised is that there are couple of millions of them living on this planet , perhaps billions that have not been described so far ,


http://mbioblog.asm.org/mbiosphere/2...d-viruses.html

http://arstechnica.com/science/2009/...tarctic-lakes/

now , this is very old article by todays terms :

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/158203.stm

Sci/Tech

Planet bacteria


For the first time scientists have a direct estimate of the total number of bacteria on earth and it is an almost unbelievable figure. Our science editor Dr David Whitehouse reports.
The scientists from the University of Georgia estimate the number of bacteria on our planet to be five million trillion trillion - that's a five with 30 zeroes after it.

There are far more bacteria on earth than there are stars in the universe.

"There simply hadn't been any estimates of the number of bacteria on Earth," said microbiologist William Whitman.

"Because they are so diverse and important, we thought it made sense to get a picture of their magnitude."

When people think of bacteria, they likely first consider the harmful ones that cause disease.

But the bacteria inside all animals combined, including humans, makes up less than one percent of the total amount.

By far the greatest numbers are in the subsurface, soil and oceans.


Scientists call bacteria "prokaryotes," a term that describes a single-cell organism without a genetic nucleus.

Prokaryotes are extraordinarily diverse and range from plant-like cells that produce molecular oxygen in the oceans to soil-borne bacteria.

Scientists have found these cells 40 miles high in the atmosphere and miles beneath the ocean floor.

In order to estimate the total number of bacteria on earth, the group at Georgia divided the planet into several areas, including oceanic and other aquatic environments, the soil, the subsurface of soil, and other habitats such as the air, inside animals and the surface of leaves.

"By combining direct measurements of the number of prokaryotic cells in various habitats, we found the total number of cells was much larger than we expected," said Mr Whitman.

Another important part of the study was an estimate of carbon content in bacteria.

The team found that the total amount of bacterial carbon in the soil and subsurface to be yet another staggering number, the weight of the United Kingdom.

Surprisingly, the group at Georgia found that the total carbon in bacteria is nearly equal to the total carbon found in plants.

The inclusion of this carbon in global models will greatly increase estimates of the amount of carbon stored in living organisms. The new estimates could also change assumptions about the relative amount in plants of other essential nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus.

It had been estimated before that one-half of the living mass on Earth is microbial, but the new figures indicate that this estimate is probably much too low.

The study could open new areas of research, especially about the rate of mutations and how bacteria operate in nature. The new numbers also point out that events that are extremely rare in the laboratory could occur frequently in nature.

Because the number of bacteria is so large, events that would occur once in 10 billion years in the laboratory would occur every second somewhere on the Earth.

That's of course incredibly high amount of contamination which itself is more than sufficient reason to quarantine this planet unless there are more efficient means deployed to decontaminate higher living organisms - in contact with other Space inhabitants, for example .

The density of microbiota in todays 'healthy populace' ( so called , not acutely infected one ) is still rising exponentially .. due to the amount of trade - bio-chain - we are part of , waste produced and accumulated especially under big city agglomerations ,
human density and exposure to each others bacterial and viral cultures .

If we speak of 'cultural exchange' or 'diplomatic relationships' and 'instability in middle east' , those things however chaotic still seem to have some sort of rules and they take time to accomplish .

In the meantime , 'exchange of bacterial and viral cultures' is ongoing , happening very fast and in between fields of vast colonies of organisms whose collective intelligence and intents we can barely track or understand .

Now back to Africa , since the equatorial climate is so good for fast recycling of life and endless natural experiment and the richest treasury of various life forms on this planet concentrated around the equatorial bend ,
the number of micro-organisms living in the swamps and jungles of Africa, Indonesia , Amazonia and so forth that had never been described yet is also incredibly large .

They of course live in ecosystem that is extremely diverse and makes one life form feed on another , and we never notice when one type of them goes extinct and another comes to life . If I say there are millions of them and thousands that are potentially lethal to humans it's probably very poor underestimate .

The local populace who lived in the jungle and around for thousands of years had been well aware of the fact .

One reason why woodoo and cult of death was so widespread in Africa and many other similar biotopes is that people had to live side to side with infectious diseases affecting them out of sudden , causing anything from fever , fast disintegration of organism , madness , and death of people and animals and many of those cases were 'mysterious' enough not to be well understood even by these aborigines who usually have talent for finding causes of diseases and often did have an idea - especially in northern , colder climates where from infection occurs, how does it spread and whether it can be treated ,
here the cause ..for someone emerging from the jungle ..was often impossible to find and the person ( ''possessed with ghost'' or ''turned to zombie'' ) had to be killed to protect the rest of the community .

Many travellers, anthropologists and discoverers and their aids who travelled to equatorial Africa in the past passed away for infection, and it was not always one of the now quoted and known ones .

...

In the case of epidemics that grows out of proportions .. such as this one .. it would be the most important to track the 'epicentre' and source of the disease ,

that may be particular water source , dead animal no one has noticed polluting the water or other food in the area ,

once the source is known and can be eliminated there's a chance to stop spreading of the epidemics .

It's perhaps strange to imagine but it's been observed long ago yet .. how some of these viral or bacterial cultures exhibit group intelligence pattern that makes them act as dominant and invincible predator as long as they maintain connection with their 'mother culture' . Once the source - the strongest genomic potential of them can be destroyed - the 'daughter cultures' who sometimes happen to mutate anyway can be handled without causing so much damage .


So I think ... also with respect to future ... the danger of microbes spreading out of these areas and attacking human civilisation can not be underestimated .
There were/are areas in the jungle where even the locals would never go or declare them 'dead zones' .

Nowadays , much of their habitat was already invaded without much respect to any rules known to the aboriginal populace ,
and the trend to explore and exploit natural resources continues so what can we expect ..

[Neal]

Thanks Bill for posting this. I remember reading this excellent book back during High School -- very eye-opening and certainly worth to read!

[Roisin]

I read this book years ago and recently re-read it again. It's a real eye-opener and I suggest that anyone who wants to know more about Ebola should read that book.

[Carmody]

From my understanding..the 'deal' or OOO, 'Order Of Operations' in this extant systems was and is..if...free energy or over unity devices ..whatever the case may be..if it begins to go mainstream..to enact a policy of genocide and control of data..immediately. To use a prepared method of 'absolute' societal control via the introduction of chaos, war, pandemic, radiation and other screaming memes.... so the free energy/over unity data and associated methods and understandings....... is lost.

The few (people) that I consider to understand this system, are all afraid of over unity/free energy, for the one thing: that it ushers in 'the end times', where humanity is ripped apart by this thousands of years old secrecy society system (at least one sect of it, that is).

There are now, according to reports (whatever that means) more symptomatic people in Dallas.

If the above, of agenda, is true, I expect a small time period of spreading the thing around, then the introduction of something a bit more virulent, airborne, possibly. In such a situation, martial law can be introduced, where one is forced to stay in their house...and die (to move is to be shot). If most people have only a few days of food, then... a two week incubation is 'adequate' for such a population reduction scenario. Or at the least, the obliteration of human will (regarding cities) would be achieved.

IF..one comes out for food and managed to not be shot, they would probably be corralled into the same pen/cage, with others. In that cage, the virus can run rampant.

All this would seem 'logical' and follow expected parameters, if the person(s) had no idea of virus research and modification by black ops/secret groups, and no idea of 'free energy' and other alternative movements/motions. Thus the bulk of humanity would walk this presented public line, and live and die by it, never knowing it is a farce and wholly false construction.

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by MorningFox (here)

I'm open to concede if explained otherwise, but really I don't see the need for this thread. Utter fear mongering at it's most potent, with not much of a point or end goal other than that... ?

Many thanks for that. Please let me offer a response.

In my view, this isn't fear-mongering. The book, though explicit, is a historical account, and actually doesn't exaggerate. It's just good information, should any of us feel we need it.

I maintain the position that we live in a world where we NEED good information, because mainstream sources cannot always be relied on (and that may be putting it kindly!).

And, re the current Ebola situation in the world (whether or not it dies out), it may also be useful information to really see as a fact that the the CDC, and possibly agencies in some other countries, are handling this at best incompetently, and at worst criminally. I do hold that strong view.

Posted by Jean-Luc (here)
I've done a quick proofreading & editing of Bill's OCR version of the book THE HOT ZONE. Here's it is. Half as many pages, and I guess easier to read.

http://www.vigli.org/Avalon/THE_HOT_...rd_Preston.pdf

Thank you! I was unable to get this link to work, but I did successfully receive it from you via WeTransfer, and I've updated my own original link on the Avalon server. (Same link, but the PDF is updated):

http://projectavalon.net/THE_HOT_ZON...rd_Preston.pdf

Alternatively, Jean-Luc's WeTransfer file (the same updated pdf, together with a version in in .docx form) is downloadable here for another 7 days:
http://wsi.li/TR2gBIcVAPNP/616863

[Cardillac]

look, folks, we need to take a step back and look at this Ebola scare from a farther perspective (the minute fear-porn is introduced we need to look at the situation much more objectively and with a cool head)- didn't the bird/swine flu scares fizzle into obscurity- and the presently 'labeled' Ebola should be any different?-

where is the documented, scientific proof that Ebola as such even exists?- THERE IS NONE- full-stop-

is it not yet clear to most that Africans are being bombarded with a whole series of vaccinations that could possibly have side-effects (gosh) and all of these various side-effects are being lumped together by the MSM into the concept 'Ebola'?-

it continues to baffle me how people can fall for these MSM "scare stories"; and it continues to baffle me how gullible people are to "fear-porn" (it's the mantra of the Illuminati)-

look, folks, please be a little more objective about this concept; NOT ONE OF US knows anyone infected by "Ebola"!!!- if the threat was that serious...ohh, forget it- sometimes I think I'm wasting my orthographic breath...

Larry

[bruno dante]

Ebola is no doubt a fearsome and insidious virus; yet, if it is worse than anthrax and more diabolical than AIDS, how did Kent Brantly walk out of that Georgia hospital as healthy as a horse after only 19 days?

I wonder what so-called pandemics like swine flu or bird flu would have done in some African countries. Certainly they would have killed many, many thousands. A plague! And if we in America had allowed a few of these sick folks in the country, we'd be talking about swine flu or sars or bird flu or whatever. Of course, now we know that with reasonable precautions and first world advancements, these things can be contained. I believe it's the same with ebola. Kent Brantly showed that. I know we've recently lost an ebola patient here too; truth is, we don't have enough patients to establish a baseline - let's hope we don't get them! - but it has been demonstrated that ebola can be conquered with the right treatment and in a very short period of time. I find this to be pretty encouraging!

And if many of these virus' have been weaponized, why are they killing so few people? And by "few", I mean a number not significant enough to make a noticeable dent in the population. After all, that's the theory, right? That the NWO is trying to reduce population etc...? You'd have to kill millions to do that. It just doesn't add up to me.

It seems more of a fear based plan to me, rather than practical. Sordid, other worldly entities feed off the fear, if you believe in that sort of thing, and their earthly counterparts feed off the money they attract thru such situations. My 2 cents.

[778 neighbour of some guy]

Strecker Memorandum ( I suppose one could easily replace AIDS with Ebola), I suggest you watch this presentation.

This is the most controversial video you'll ever see. Dr. Robert Strecker refutes, with documented evidence, virtually everything the so-called experts and government reports have told you about AIDS. He asserts in no uncertain terms that:

* AIDS is a man-made disease
* AIDS is not a homosexual disease
* AIDS is not a venereal disease
* AIDS can be carried by mosquitos
* There will never be a vaccine

Although decades have passed and untold billions have been spent in research, cancer is still with us, the second major cause of death in America. The most dreaded fear that all oncologists (cancer doctors), virologists and immunologists live with is that someday cancer in one form or another will become a contagious disease, transferable from one person to another.

AIDS has now made that fear a reality, and if you think you're safe because you're not gay or promiscuous, or because you're not sexually active, then you had better watch this video very carefully until you fully understand what Dr. Strecker is telling you as he takes you step by step and shows you how this dreaded disease was actually man-made. Condoms can't prevent it and there won't ever be a vaccine. Dr. Strecker shows how AIDS was predicted, requested, created, deployed and works very well!

Dr. Robert B. Strecker is a practicing Internist and Gastroenterologist. In addition, he holds a Ph.D. in Pharmacology and is a trained Pathologist.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=s0aAC2F6Tcs

[Agape]

How not to catch Ebola ...


http://www.bbc.com/news/health-29518703

How not to catch Ebola




As the outbreak continues to spread, the fear of catching the disease is rising.

Experts are learning more about how to contain the virus that has infected around 7,500 people in West Africa.

The race is on to stop this deadly disease that kills more than half of those it infects.

Here's what is known.


DON'T TOUCH
Ebola is spread by direct contact with contaminated body fluids. Blood, vomit and saliva can all carry and spread the deadly virus.

The relatives of sick patients and the healthcare workers who care for them are at highest risk of infection, but anyone who comes into close proximity potentially puts themselves at risk.

For that reason, contact should only be for essential medical care and always under the full protection of the right clothing.

The virus can't breach protective gear, such as gloves, a mask, goggles, a full body suit and tough rubber wellington boots, but too few have access to state-of-the-art kit.


Those who do get to wear it should keep changing it every 40 minutes to be safe. Inside the suit it can get up to about 40C. Getting into the kit takes about five minutes. Taking it off again takes the wearer and a designated helper "buddy" about 15 minutes.

This is one of the most dangerous times for contamination and people are sprayed with chlorine as this happens.


COVER YOUR EYES

If an infected droplet does get on to your skin, it can be washed away immediately with soap and water or an alcohol-based hand sanitiser.

The eyes are a different matter. A spray of droplets from a sneeze directly into the eye, for example, could let the virus in.

Similarly, the mucous membranes of the mouth and inside of the nose are vulnerable areas, as is broken skin.


LAUNDRY


One of the most shocking symptoms of Ebola is bleeding. Patients can bleed from the eyes, ears, nose, mouth and rectum. Diarrhoea and vomit may also be tainted with blood.

A big infection risk is cleaning up. Any laundry or other clinical waste should be incinerated. Any medical equipment that needs to be kept should be decontaminated.

Without adequate sterilisation, virus transmission can continue and amplify.

Minute droplets on a surface that hasn't been adequately cleaned could, in theory, pose a risk. And it's unclear how long the virus could sit there and remain a threat. Flu viruses and other germs can live two hours or longer on hard environmental surfaces like tables, doorknobs, and desks.

The nurse who recently became infected while caring for two Ebola patients in Spain had twice gone into the room where one of the the patients was being treated - to be directly involved in his care and to disinfect the room after his death. Both times she was wearing protective clothing.

Soap and water or alcohol-based hand sanitisers readily disrupt the envelope of this single-stranded RNA virus, and decontamination with dilute bleach is effective and readily available even in remote settings.


CONDOMS


Generally, once someone recovers from Ebola and they have the all-clear, they can no longer spread the virus.

But Ebola virus has been found in semen for up to three months.

For this reason, doctors say that people who recover from Ebola should abstain from sex or use condoms for three months.



Apparently, little contradiction at the end ... so even if you are declared 'all-clear' , the virus can still survive in your reproduction system if you have been infected previously .

[Flash]

Posted by Cardillac (here)
look, folks, we need to take a step back and look at this Ebola scare from a farther perspective (the minute fear-porn is introduced we need to look at the situation much more objectively and with a cool head)- didn't the bird/swine flu scares fizzle into obscurity- and the presently 'labeled' Ebola should be any different?-

where is the documented, scientific proof that Ebola as such even exists?- THERE IS NONE- full-stop-

is it not yet clear to most that Africans are being bombarded with a whole series of vaccinations that could possibly have side-effects (gosh) and all of these various side-effects are being lumped together by the MSM into the concept 'Ebola'?-

it continues to baffle me how people can fall for these MSM "scare stories"; and it continues to baffle me how gullible people are to "fear-porn" (it's the mantra of the Illuminati)-

look, folks, please be a little more objective about this concept; NOT ONE OF US knows anyone infected by "Ebola"!!!- if the threat was that serious...ohh, forget it- sometimes I think I'm wasting my orthographic breath...

Larry

I was reading about it in the mid and late 90's. So im ny book it does exits.

[Hervé]

Dept. of Defense Ebola manual: smoking guns

Oct 9, 2014 by Jon Rappoport
http://www.nomorefakenews.com

As I’ve been pointing out, the standard test for diagnosing Ebola is the PCR, which has many flaws that render it misleading and useless.

Therefore, “diagnosed with Ebola,” through the PCR test, means nothing. “Ebola” could be flu, could be “drinking contaminated water,” could be any number of non-Ebola conditions.

Analogy: you’re flying a plane at night over a land mass your instruments tell you is Greenland—but the instruments often indicate Greenland when they should be reporting Iceland, Alaska, Nova Scotia, Quebec or even Fiji.

So when the authorities report there are 6000 cases of Ebola and 3000 deaths, or when they report that two patients in the US have Ebola, they’re relying on a diagnostic test that can’t confirm any of these assertions is true.

This is verified in spades by a Dept. of Defense manual. The title is: “Joint Project Manager Medical Countermeasures Systems.” It is dated 14 August 2014.

Under the title is the statement: “Manufactured by the Naval Medical Research Center for the US DOD.”

Here is a quote:

“The EZ1 assay [the PCR test] should not be performed unless the individual has been exposed to or is at risk for exposure to Ebola Zaire virus or has signs and symptoms of infection with Ebola Zaire virus (detected in the West Africa outbreak in 2014) that meet clinical and epidemiologic criteria for testing suspect specimens.”

Translation: “Unless you’re already pretty sure the patient has Ebola—whatever that means—don’t run the test, because the test isn’t all that reliable.”

Not very reassuring. A test is a test. It’s supposed to register a true positive or negative result on anyone.

Here’s another quote:

“[The PCR test] should not be used as the sole basis for patient management decisions. Results [of the PCR] are for the presumptive identification of the Ebola Zaire virus (detected in the West Africa outbreak in 2014).”

Translation: “The word ‘presumptive’ means ‘we’re not sure’. And that’s right. We’re not sure. Don’t rely on the PCR for a definitive diagnosis of Ebola.”

Here is the final quote:

“The definitive identification of the Ebola Zaire virus (detected in the West Africa outbreak in 2014) requires additional testing and confirmation procedures in consultation with public health or other authorities for whom reporting is required. The diagnosis of Ebola Zaire virus (detected in the West Africa outbreak in 2014) infection must be made based on history, signs, symptoms, exposure likelihood, and other laboratory evidence in addition to the identification of the Ebola Zaire virus (detected in the West Africa outbreak in 2014) by this [PCR] test.”

That’s the capper. It baldly states that other diagnostic tests must be run. I can tell you what those other tests should be. One, purification and direct isolation of the virus from the patient; and two, a test to determine the amount of virus in the patient—because millions and millions of active Ebola virus must be present in the patient to even begin to say he is “an Ebola case.”

And I can tell you these tests are not being run on so-called Ebola patients.
Therefore, this whole “Ebola event” is the blind leading the blind.

We see other evidence of this. Press reports are mentioning the fact that far fewer “Ebola patients” than expected are showing blood hemorrhaging. Another tip-off that the PCR test is bringing into the fold “presumptive cases of Ebola”—people who are suffering from factors that have nothing to do with Ebola.

Last week, when Tom Frieden, the head of the CDC, gave a press conference concerning “the Dallas Ebola patient,” he assured one and all that the patient had Ebola, because the PCR test, “a very accurate test,” had been run.

Another CDC lie.

Some readers, who haven’t been reading all my Ebola articles, will respond by saying, “If it isn’t Ebola, then what is it?”

The flaw in that question is the use of the word “it,” which suggests that whatever is making people sick and killing them is one thing.

This is the same flaw present in AIDS, West Nile, SARS, bird flu, Swine Flu. The assumption that one germ is responsible, in each “epidemic,” is false.

The illness and death occurred for many different reasons—and the medical trick involved pretending a single virus connected all these disparate people together.

In other words: hoax.

Jon Rappoport

*********************************

Here is Jon's article expanding on why an "it" is an unfounded assumption. In other words, the result of the medical industry programing of populations:

*********************************

Death doesn’t = someone’s opinion about death

Oct 8, 2014 by Jon Rappoport
NoMoreFakeNews.com

“I saw people die of HIV.”

No. You saw people die. Doctors said they had HIV.

“I saw people die from Ebola.”

No you didn’t. You saw people die. You yourself have no idea what killed them. You can pretend you know, but you don’t.

“The doctors know what kills people.”

You win a gold star for your faith. You’re now a fully-fledged member of the Church of Biological Mysticism.

People who see other people die often assume they know why it happened. Certainly, when it comes to viruses, they don’t have a clue. They’re sure they know. That doesn’t make them right.

A parent’s healthy son returns from the doctor’s office, saying he just found out he’s HIV-positive. He tells his mother the doctor has put him on AZT. Three weeks later, the boy folds up, can’t get out of bed. He’s so weak he can hardly move. The doctor says, “HIV has spiraled out of control. It’s full-blown AIDS. He must continue taking his AZT.” Three months later, the boy is dead.

The mother says, “My son died of HIV.”

Does she know that AZT, a failed chemotherapy drug, was taken off the shelf for AIDS patients, and that it mercilessly attack all cells of the body, including the immune-system cells?

Of course not.

As I’ve repeatedly pointed out over the past 27 years (starting with my first book, “AIDS Inc., Scandal of the Century”), covert medical ops will use death and dying to construct a false picture of the cause of death and dying.

They know this strategy works, because people, seeing death, will accept what the authorities tell them caused it.

I’ve often cited the groundbreaking review, “Is US health really the best in the world?” Author, Dr. Barbara Starfield, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health. Publisher: The Journal of the American Medical Association, July 26, 2000.

Starfield concluded that, every year in the US, the medical system directly kills 225,000 people. 106,000 die as a result of medicines the FDA has approved as safe. The other 119,000 die as a result of treatment in hospitals.

Add it up. That’s 2.25 million deaths per decade caused by the US medical system.

Now for the question: how many of those deaths… do you think doctors…voluntarily admit…to families of the dead patients…are medically caused?

I’ll tell you.

None.

In every case, a lie was cooked up. “I’m sorry, but the disease suddenly accelerated…”

That’s 2.25 million lies per decade about the actual cause of death.

But people continue to worship at the feet of doctors and medical experts.

If a doctor says a patient died of virus VCX-2QK-89tf, a supposed thing the mother of the patient will never see and never have a chance of seeing…and if the doctor says he knows the patient had the virus because a diagnostic test was run on the patient…the mother will believe the doctor…even though she has absolutely no idea what kind of diagnostic test was run or whether it is accurate or even relevant.

“I saw my son die of the virus.”

She didn’t. But she’ll believe it. We can understand why she believes it.

But that doesn’t affect our judgment when we look into a virus and investigate whether it is real, whether it actually causes disease, and whether the diagnostic tests for the virus tell a true story.

When you have hundreds of millions of people who assert that Ebola is killing people, you’re looking at faith.

Blind faith in authorities who don’t deserve it.

You’re looking at the construction of reality, which is then sold.

Take this example—a farming village in Liberia, one of the so-called epicenters of Ebola. The families manage to produce enough to get by. They live downstream from a giant Firestone rubber plantation.

For years, to no avail, the people of the village have been protesting the runoff of noxious elements into their water supply. Fish are dying. Crops are failing. That means malnutrition, hunger.

That means chemical assault on their immune systems.

People are developing sores, lesions, fevers, respiratory problems, digestive problems, including diarrhea.

How easy is it to call this Ebola, in light of the current hysteria?

“Everyone knows” it’s Ebola. But it isn’t.

People are obsessed by the idea that a whole population, in far-off nation, under the gun, must all be suffering from One Thing—in this case, a virus.

Splitting this apart into a number of different causes in different regions—contaminated water, open sewage, severe malnutrition, decimating wars, toxic vaccine campaigns, the vast overuse of antibiotics, industrial pollution—this doesn’t have the compelling ring of: “It’s a virus.”

So people say, “Forget about all that. We don’t want to know about it. We know it’s a virus.”

No they don’t.

Jon Rappoport

[chocolate]

I think - and that would be a really personal opinion, so I hope nobody will hold it against this forum! - that in many occasions we don't see the forest for the trees.
Until we start using some common sense and some logic ( really handy tools ), and until we start understanding how reality works, we will be believing whatever someone/anyone needs or wants us to believe.

Regardless of how this has started, I seriously doubt that the agencies of the whole world, or at least of several countries/continents, are part of some grand conspiracy plot, to try and let it spread.

This is not fear mongering here, but i would call it 'an old school' tool called spreading of information.

I will not read the book, or may be I will if I could find some free time.

---

There have been many treatments of this scenario.
For those who watch movies I can suggest Eleventh Hour: Season 1, Episode 5
Containment
http://gorillavid.in/v0ttbwyroh92

As for the rest, I hope we'll stop swinging in all directions and start looking in the direction that matters.

Cheers.
Chocolate

[avid]

re: Jon Rappoport et al - thanks to Amzer Zo
I read these articles and was reminded of the death certificates of my parents - which weren't entirely true - since when is 'frailty' a cause of death? That's just one issue on one parent. The signatories don't necessarily read past history, they just have to sign quickly - the cause of death could have been from prolonged misdiagnosis and wrong medications...., but once the loved one is deceased, unless one has reasonable doubt, one is pressurised into 'signing them off', to relieve one's grief - and possibly the guilt one carries that one didn't take enough care to ensure the elder was treated properly, despite many protestations and desperate efforts to maintain them well for years. The above articles ring so true, cause of death may be much more complex than just being 'written off' easily, and without the repercussions really required to absolve relatives, and perhaps the medical profession - it may have been the vile drugs that killed off our loved ones. We just carry blindly on in the 'disposal system'.... sadly.

I had a copy of the book "The Hot Zone" in 1998, and it was so horrific it was emblazoned into my memory. I lent it to a friend (who has since passed away) and it's one of those books one wished one still had - to refer to and to reassure oneself that these things are not insurmountable. I do suspect that this whole hype may be a false flag with 'crisis actors' for the western media. However - we shall see, as all sorts of stressed-out 'contactees' are presenting with 'stress-related' symptoms, which will of course include nausea, headaches et al - see the list above in this thread, and be calmed.

[sdv]

Ebola is not a threat to First World countries.

The history of the disease has shown that the health care providers who take care of those who have the disease are high risk for getting the virus/disease. Has any First World health care worker contracted the disease/virus and died? Nope (and I apologise if I am wrong in this assessment).

In this latest outbreak some kind of magic cure has been revealed (note that this magic cure did not save the black man from Africa who ended up in Texas, but has saved the lives of Westerners/First Worlders who contracted the disease).

African doctors discovered a vaccine many years ago, in a desperate attempt to save a colleague. Unless Ebola threatens the populations from First World countries (i.e. those who can pay and thus are food for profit) there is no incentive to develop any vaccine or cure.

Ebola is transmitted through bodily fluids, so you have to have intimate contact with someone with the virus in its active stage to be exposed and be able to contract the disease/virus. It is actually easy to shut down and contain in First World conditions. Why is it so difficult to do so in Africa? Overcrowded conditions, lack of facilities, ignorance, lack of personal responsibility for a greater good (I want sex now and don't care if I may spread HIV/AIDS or Ebola or anything else or produce another child that I will not take care of and give a decent chance to be independent and successful in life) ...

In Africa, corruption and incompetence and rampant violence and unlawfulness is common. These are the perfect conditions for the spread of the virus. African health care workers are now demanding more money and are on a go slow until they get more money. This is the thinking of Africa. It is also typical of Africans to have more than 12 children and have no means to support and educate those children.

I watched a panel discussion where the panelists supported home care to stop this virus. Home care in Africa? Where people live in overcrowded conditions and share toilets, and so on?

This is what Africa needs:

1. Education,education, education. And the real stuff, not the training of monkeys to pass tests.
   
2. Zero tolerance for corruption and self enrichment (why is the world still accepting Jacob Zuma, who is destroying South Africa for generations to come?).
   
3. Empowerment by providing the funds for (really cheap to build basic buildings) and giving support for the building of infrastructure, houses, schools, clinics, LIBRARIES ...

If Ebola is a weapon to reduce the burgeoning population of Africa, it will fail because the population growth will not be affected at all by this virus/disease.

If Ebola is a weapon aimed at the First World, it will not work, because it is easy to contain and stop in First World conditions.

Do you know that HIV/AIDS is spreading fastest in South Africa?

Real education and moving Africa from corrupt victimhood to the empowerment of intelligently moving to self responsibility is what is needed. But why do it when something like Ebola kills Africans who are reproducing way beyond sustainable capacity anyway?

Why is the First World wasting so much money on fighting Islam? Here is a study that profiles the typical Muslim terrorist:
http://www.issafrica.org/uploads/Paper265.pdf

(Hints: lack of education, marginalization, extreme poverty).

[Cardillac]

@Flash

you might have read a cover-story (cover stories exist- what a concept!); then inform yourself about the pharmaceutical scam known as "AIDS"- and "Ebola" should be anything different?- same s**t, different day...

"I was reading about it in the mid and late 90's"- all major scams are at least orthographically fomented decades in advance





come on, Flash, you've been on this website long enough and long enough on this earth to have realized we're all/all of us being deceived in every way, shape and form- anything reported in the MSM is a lie-

[aheb]

I read the book, and to echo some opinions already expressed here. The symptoms and the way people are dying does not sound like the symptoms that I read about in the book, which was a lot more horrific. I do not think that it poses a serious threat to advanced countries. I do think that it could decimate Africa, and also I have heard that many people working in Africa are from the Indian sub continent, so I believe that it could very easily spread there, and then maybe to China. In short anywhere with a large population base living in an agrarian type environment with access to big cities.
It woud be a good way to decimate the BRICS countries at least India and China ( if I was of a conspiratorial mindset)

[ghostrider]

http://theyflyblog.com/2014/10/05/bi...ic-prediction/ What concerns me is Ebola is something mentioned by Enoch specifically , an outbreak of Ebola would happen in the third millennium ... I don't trust the CDC , I think Ebola can be spread as an airborne virus ...it's a good excuse for the TSA to further clamp down on citizens that fly ... also keep people restricted from travel , enter Fema camps , if the epidemic gains strength quickly, people would march like sheep right into ready made prison (Fema) camps to feel safe from Ebola ... The ptb would further want to know where you've been , where are you going , who you talk to , and make vaccines mandatory for all ...

[Roisin]

Seattle scientist: Government 'underestimated' Ebola

http://www.king5.com/story/news/heal...bola/16956505/



SEATTLE -- A Seattle scientist who has studied Ebola for more than a decade says he feels federal officials underestimated the power of the current outbreak in West Africa.

Dr. Michael Katze is a University of Washington microbiologist who leads a team of researchers working to determine why some people survive Ebola and others do not.

On Wednesday, the day of the first Ebola death in the U.S., KING 5 sat down with Katze to get his perspective on the latest developments.

"I think our national response at the level of the CDC, the National Institute of Health and the World Health Organization has been really inadequate," he said. "And I think the only positive thing that could come out of this epidemic or outbreak is that people are better prepared for the next outbreak."

Katze said he was sad to learn of Thomas Eric Duncan's death in Dallas, but he also says it could happen again. He says he's seen a lot of misinformation and miscommunication by federal officials regarding Ebola.

"I think they underestimated the power of the outbreak. I think they said things like, 'There was zero risk of this, zero risk of that,' and I think, obviously, there's not zero risk of anything," he said.

Katze is most concerned about the misconceptions surrounding Ebola, from how it's transmitted to the so-called incubation period of 21 days. He says nothing is certain because there hasn't been enough research done on the deadly virus. For instance, he says there's still no way to be absolutely sure Ebola is only transmitted through bodily fluids. It could spread more easily than assumed.

"From a scientific point of view, none of these dogma, none of these statements are really based in any scientific fact, because the only model we've had thus far is is research on non-human primates," said Katze.

His team has spent the last two years conducting experiments on mice as well, trying to determine how a person's genetics might impact their fate after being diagnosed with Ebola.

"You know, which of your genes, which of my genes, would determine whether you would live, die or develop hemorrhagic fever from Ebola virus infection," said Dr. Angela Rasmussen, who is one of Katze's research assistant professors.

Katze says that important research will continue in his Seattle laboratory, until they find the answers they're looking for.

As people walk that fine line between being cautious about Ebola and panicking about Ebola, he says education is incredibly important. Katze welcomes questions from the public through his website, where you can also read more about his team's Ebola research.