WADE FRAZIER : A Healed Planet

[Nine]

Wade,

"Max" worked for my federal agency.....

I knew him well....he was my boss....

Trouble is that their were so many like Max that when one Boss replaced the other nothing changed and so they were all the same.

And so none of us that wanted the job done and done right ever went into management....was recruited a bunch but left with some honor or as you say a bit of "integrity" intact....

And of course the latest fear porn on the "net" is how they are I mean the gubbernment is going to label folks that question events such as 9/11 are terrorists and will be dealt with accordingly....

Of course the government is right to be concerned when the Alt media is making some crazy with rage. Of course with the obsession comes the loss of reason and so reading your works one would know that this is just a hint at the bigger problem....

Of course thinking about Roads world one could not help but noticing that Max was no where to be found and so I can envision such a world....

thanx

Nine

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Nine:

Yes, we have created systems in which the Maxes thrive. Max was an amateur compared to Godzilla's minions. There is a lot to the systemic conditions that encourage behaviors like Max's. Psychopaths make great corporate executives and politicians, as the organizational goals are amassing wealth and power.

When we had Godzilla's psychopaths sicced on us, such as Bill the BPA Hit Man, Mr. Texas, and Mr. Deputy, they all had the overgrown Boy Scout act honed to a high degree. When they took out their axes and began swinging them, the part that I found hard to believe was how people were mesmerized by their Boy Scout shtick and cheered their bloodshed or acquiesced to it. At first, I could not believe what I was seeing, but I finally understood that it was one of many ways that people abdicate their sentience for the promise of a full belly. Average people are putty in the hands of the psychopaths, as their self-interest is easily turned against them.

A big reason why Godzilla is so against FE and abundance is that his lever of control would disappear. In a world of scarcity, the promise of wealth, or the threat of taking it away, is his primary avenue of control. If everybody lived in abundance, the psychopaths' tactics would no longer work so well.

So, again, I am looking for needles in haystacks, and have designed what I am doing so that the psychopaths - Godzilla's, those working for more local interests, and the free-lancers - will have a difficult time cracking the nut. This is another reason why the social circle approach will not work for FE. The social circle approach relies on pre-sentient traits (people's appearance, body language, etc.), and only sentience will get us over the hump.

As I saw with my CIA contract agent relative, or Ralph McGehee's grim adventures, most of the dirty work is not performed by psychopaths, but people who believe in the cause (but they really believe in lies, such those Founding Father myths), and their consciences are haunted for the rest of their lives. Given a chance, about a third of all men become sadists. This is the "demonic male" hypothesis of Wrangham and Peterson. Bonobos overcame it, so I have some confidence that humans can. Bonobos did it when their food supply doubled, and if humans lived in abundance, we would no longer have people like George Bush, Cheney, and Rummy on stage, playing their demonic ape games. As long as those are the games being played, Godzilla is content. When Young Warriors want to go get the "bad guys," Godzilla sits back and purrs. Love is the answer, and always has been.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

I can tell that I am chicken about doing another edit of my huge American Empire essay, as I just tackled another small one.

We will what other small ones get my attention before I embark on that American Empire essay. I am only making grammar and style changes, and I always catch a few more typos when I do that.

I will probably be pretty quiet today, and have hand out candy this evening to the trick-or-treaters. I might sneak out for a hike in the rain.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

I was not able to get around to hiking (and the weather is a little inclement), so here goes a post. It is kind of anecdote time but related to a recent theme regarding a person's motivation. In general, it takes one to know one, but people also tend to project their motivation onto others, so understanding a person's motivation is not easy, but it is their actions that show who they are, not words, gestures, and the like, although they can give hints. Those hints can put the radar up, but I will always give people the benefit of the doubt if I can, until they show me their true colors. In what I do, somebody usually has to show some "colors" before I will let them in too close.

When I read Ralph McGehee's book in 1990, I immediately recognized another overgrown Boy Scout who woke up the hard way. There really are not many like us, not who play on the stage that we do, which is big strike against humanity turning the corner. Ten like Dennis combining their efforts, and FE would be a done deal, but I do not know of anybody else like Dennis. A hundred like Brian and Mr. Professor, and that would be enough, too, but their journeys wrecked and shortened their lives. All of them put forth herculean, life-risking effort, and by their labors I knew who they were. They were all still human, but that fire inside them to do the right thing is something that almost does not exist in today's humanity, other than in Hollywood movies.

We also had psychopaths sicced on us, at varying levels of dark-path mastery, when our efforts became potentially disruptive to the rackets, and Godzilla is the undisputed master of that game. Invariably, the psychopaths and sociopaths (sociopaths usually need training, while psychopaths have the natural "talent") tried to look like overgrown Boy Scouts, too. That was how they could get in close to plant their daggers in our ribs. Mr. Texas and Mr. Deputy were upper-shelf assets sicced on us, but their fates reflect the vagaries of being a hit man. Mr. Texas is in prison today in his mid-70s, while Mr. Deputy is getting $250,000 per year as his pension, after retiring in his mid-50s. I recently wrote that Bill the BPA Hit Man was on his own for years and pulled his signature scams, but was recently bought out for millions to become a medical racket hit man. Bill is about 70 now. Unlike Mr. Texas (who is in prison in California), Bill still has utility, and lives in California, which is pretty much the heart of darkness in the USA today. It has been "interesting" to follow their careers since they finished helping to snuff us out.

All of them eventually showed us who they were, usually when it could do the most damage. In that game, it does not make sense to unmask yourself until you stick your dagger in your target's ribs. Mr. Skeptic similarly unmasked himself to me with his libelous Skeptical Inquirer article, and removed any doubt about his motivation when he made up new lies when his old ones were exposed, while never even admitting to the old lies. There is no doubt to give him the benefit of, although it is still an open question for me if he was on the payroll or not. I think that he probably was, but it is not that important to know, and his situation would be more instructive and interesting if he was free-lancing his "skepticism."

All of that makes it hard enough for people like Dennis, but what is more relevant is how naïve and dishonest the leading voices in the FE field today are, as they lie about Dennis while making excuses for Mr. Skeptic and also attacking Brian. Those kinds of behaviors only further confirmed my journey's primary lesson and are why I no longer have anything to do with the FE field. I am doing something different and am looking outside the field for recruits to the choir.

However, I have also been privy to efforts to take down FE efforts from the inside that could be called the "long con." People have inveigled themselves into FE efforts as the most enthusiastic supporters, and just when their support is really critical, they drop the bomb on the project. I have heard them called "inside" people. During my days with Dennis, particularly in Seattle and Ventura, they were inside-outside jobs, in which the inside man (or men) made his move just when the attacks came from the outside. I am designing what I am doing so that that angle will have little chance of working, because my effort removes the greed and desperation that makes those kinds of cons work. Naïveté and other qualities also make people vulnerable, and naïveté is the one that I will probably have to deal with the most, as few survive the kinds of adventures that FE activists experience to become street-wise to those games.

Reading my essay and providing astute feedback is the minimum bar for the choir, and few candidates have achieved it yet. I expect it to be a long process, and I have "budgeted" the next 30 years of my "spare" time to devote to it. Slow and steady is my motto, not fast and crash. Yes, time is short to prevent a global catastrophe, but the choir work cannot be rushed.

Time to hand out candy to trick-or-treaters.

Best,

Wade

[Seeker of Knowledge]

HI Wade,

I have read Robert A Monroe's books over and over and over which you reference in your Spirit papers. This was, correct me if I am wrong, the first "western" man to chronicle his OBE findings, way back in the 1950's. I find this very consoling in so many ways that you have spoken about this. I have gone to these other places and when I come back, I know here on this plane not a single one which I knew there. There have been times when coming back that I don't want to be here. I find it so difficult to be here after experiencing the Unconditional Love that knows no words, cannot be expressed here in this lower density that it is hard to be here. And I am sure within my heart that so many feel the same way. I believe that it is only the connection through Nature that binds the love in the place that Earth is where it is today. Beauty and Seduction is Nature's tools for Survival, because we protect what we fall in love with. It opens our hearts and makes us realize that we are part of Nature and we are not separate from it. When we see something that makes us say, Oh My God. The O means it caught your attention, it makes you present, it makes you "mindful(l)", the My means that it connects you to something deep inside your soul, the gateway for your inner voice to rise up and be heard and God, is that personal journey that we are on and to be inspired, to feel like we are connected to the Universe that celebrates Life. Thank you for being on this journey called LOVE.

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

This is a little potpourri post. I handed out candy last night to the neighborhood kids. As I have written, I live near Microsoft and our neighborhood is like a little world's fair, and the trick-or-treaters hailed from cultures all over the world. I at least handed out "organic" candy, but the American Dental Association should sponsor it. As I sit back and think of it, what a strange ritual. In other neighborhoods in the USA, it looked far different. Last night, it was astronauts, fairies, ghouls, and various animals, both real and mythical, but the USA is well-known for its offensive costumes. The whole idea of dressing up in costumes is odd. I used to act on stage, so I kind of get it, and the root of the practice goes back to before there was civilization, as people impersonated deities and animal-human combinations that can been seen in cave drawings. So, dressing up in costumes is probably a pretty old practice, pretending that we are something other than what we are.

I have written plenty about the materialist/mystical divide, and I have spent a great deal of time trying to understand the materialist position and why it is attractive. Every time that I do, I come away with the impression that materialists are primarily reacting to the excesses and irrationalities of organized religion, and are seduced by their materialist framework of rationality and the physical senses. However, they are also genuinely afraid of exploring the mystical side of the house. Again, mystical charlatans abound, just like almost nobody in the FE field really has the right stuff, so pointing to mystical charlatans or the mountain of chaff in the FE field is a lazy and dubious way to dismiss it all. In a world of scarcity and fear, there has never been a community or society that really had the love/enlightenment game mastered. Like democracy, a free press, a free market, or an objective history, it is an ideal that has never been achieved.

It really is not hard to see that the materialist "religion" is erected on a false foundation. I saw it after 40 hours of meditation training, and mine was a typical experience. Direct personal experience is where knowledge comes from, and I have found materialists and "skeptics" truly afraid of seeking experience. The "skeptics" do not seek to have their own experiences, but try to invalidate the experiences of others, so they are really the opposite of seekers, and they are the most dishonest group that I ever encountered, and that is saying something.

As October ended, which is when my site gets the most traffic of the year, because of Columbus Day, I did a final review of links to my site, as that is how potential choir members can attract my attention, here is a kind of funny one. A link to my site came from here, but I am blocked from seeing what was written, and received this reply:

"403 Error: You are trying to access the site from a location that has been banned because hacking attempts have been made from that part of the world.
"As this site is principally for customers in the UK and nearby Europe, we have blocked access from other countries where hacking seems to be a favourite pastime."

It looks like anybody from the Pacific Northwest, or maybe even the USA, has been banned from seeing it. How ironic.

My medical writings get far more exposure than my energy writings do, and I saw a new one, here.

Of the 12,000 unique visitors to my site in October (I get around 100,000 per year, although that is just the monthly visitors added up, so it is probably more like 30,000 people or so), 85% of them came directly to my site because they have a bookmark, or got a link in an email, or other direct way in which they were coming to my site because they wanted to, or somebody else directed them to it. Only 15% stumble onto my site through a search engine.

I took my email address private in 2002, as it was no longer worth it to directly interact with the public. My assailants almost always did it anonymously, cowards that they were, but when they became openly threatening, it was no longer worth it. One claimed to be a government investigator, which may have been true. Bill Ryan discovered the downside of Internet anonymity, and his screening protocol has been highly successful in keeping Avalon a civil place, which is why I am here. If somebody really wants to contact me, they can, through Avalon and other avenues. For those aspiring to be in the choir, the hard part is not contacting me, but doing the work of digesting my writings.

Back to materialism. After I had my mystical awakening, I had many experiences on my journey that showed that materialism was a false faith. It was certainly not my intent to demonstrate it, but it is a side-effect of the quest. From a prescient voice in my head that guided me on my odyssey (1, 2), to mummifying fruit and healing with a touch, to playing with weather control, to watching UFOs "light up" on request to playing with dolphins, for me to adopt a materialistic framework in light of those spectacular experiences would be stupid. And I never did any of those things as a true believer. I did them to see what would happen. I did not do it with "faith" that it would happen, but I did those things to have the experience. That attitude, of just doing the work and seeing what happens, is something that materialists and "skeptics" do not seem to be able to comprehend. If they avidly disbelieve in the phenomenon, they almost certainly will not experience it, and even if they do, their minds will go into overdrive to deny and dismiss the experience. I have written about this before.

Nobody can be dragged or seduced toward enlightenment or understanding how their reality functions, and that is another reason why my FE approach is not suitable for the social circle approach. There is no way to reach people with talk, not for my subject matter. People have to seek and attain their own experiences, and have a love of the truth so that they are not afraid of what they may find out. As I have written plenty, the fringes are filled with chaff, and enthusiasts will go to their graves clinging to stuff that was falsified long ago. That kind of blind and dogmatic faith is one of humanity's greatest failings, is found in all walks of life, and is not confined to dogmatic materialism or nationalism, capitalism, etc.

As I think of my first meeting with Seth, when he gifted me with a demonstration of with his abilities, I am reminded of reading the early Michael material. The original Michael group was in the Bay Area and used a Ouija board, and early in their sessions, Michael "wrote" that members of the group harbored doubts about the reality of what they were channeling, as if it was all some subconscious group delusion. Michael stated that he would provide a little demonstration so that those doubts were dispelled, as that kind of doubt could be counter-productive. As reported by the group's members, the air in the closed room suddenly dropped about 20 degrees Fahrenheit and a cold wind suddenly blew around the room, and loose papers flew into the air. That was a more spectacular demonstration than Seth made for me, but I understand the purpose. For my subsequent 50 Seth sessions, he never made a display like that again, but for me, he certainly did not need to. Even so, there were sporadic events that demonstrated to me very clearly that I was not witnessing some kind of acting job by the channel. Again, I did not need to seek those "proofs," but they just came with the territory of being involved with those kinds of activities and keeping one's eyes open.

So, did I get "special treatment" in my adventures? Probably, and I see them as preparation for chasing the biggest event in the human journey. While I have had great blessings on my journey and help when I least expected it, it was also a life-risking and life-wrecking journey that I would not recommend to anybody unless they considered their life forfeit before they began. I do not like the idea of victims, and to the degree that we believe in them, we do not see the bigger picture, but that does not mean that we just sit back and accept the state of affairs today as how it should be. What we do today determines our tomorrow, and only those with their heads deeply in the sand deny that we are on the edge of the abyss.

Einstein, for all of his seeming mystical orientation, which plenty of materialists have disparaged over the years, actually seemed to be kind of materialistic, as did Schrödinger and other "mystical" scientists. Many of the scientific works referred to in my big essay were rather openly materialistic, and when they presented the appearance of looking into the validity of the paranormal, their efforts were pretty poor. So, when reading Steven Pinker's work, or Thomas Suddendorf's or Richard Francis's or Carl Sagan's or Stephen Hawking's or Susan Blackmore's, as they made the case for poignant meaning in their materialism, it was really hard for me to get excited about their "vision." I know it is a false vision of how reality functions (I am not saying that I have it all figured out, but I know that consciousness is not some ephemeral byproduct of the brain's chemistry), but I was trying to see how it could be a satisfying way to view reality. In the end, I do not see how thinking that our consciousness is nothing more than an "interesting" byproduct of chemistry and biological structures can ever be a path to enlightenment, which those materialists argue that their faith does. Again, it is really an easy belief system to dispel through the knowledge gained from personal experience, so why do those materialists desperately cling to their faith as dogmatically as any religious fanatic? That is ironic indeed.

At this stage of writing this post, I see Seeker of Knowledge's post. How is that for synchronicity? I was going to write a little about the FE quest and challenges to the ego, but I will take a little detour and reply to Seeker's post…

Hi Seeker, if I may call you that. As I handed out candy last night, I watched the first Harry Potter movie in our rec room next to our front door, and Harry was a Quidditch Seeker, so your moniker has a special resonance today.

To my knowledge, although I do not claim to be deeply studied in that field, Monroe was the first of his kind in the West, at least in the 20th century. Swedenborg kind of set the standard of a scientist who could visit extra-physical dimensions, and what he reported is very consistent with what today's otherworldly travelers report.

I do not need to tell you that everybody who comes back to their bodies after a lucid NDE does not look forward to going back to their bodies, but they all report being kind of forced back into their bodies against their will. I have seen channeled work that stated that when we are in deep sleep and on our otherworldly journeys, when it is time to go back to our bodies, we often have to be seduced and coerced by our guides into coming back to our bodies. It can really make one wonder about the "wisdom" of this dimension existing at all, if we have to be seduced, coerced, and tricked into coming here, and the idea of some kind of "Fall" being responsible for this dimension makes sense to me. Whatever the case may be, I think it is obvious that the only path out is via love.

I keep stating that love and FE are joined at the hip, in both mystical and practical ways. Ungrounded mystics really do not understand, nor do hardcore materialists. Hey, I think I see a way to segue to rest of my intended post!

In finishing to my reply to your wonderful post, I'll buy that part of nature's purpose is to help wake us up, and if we can have a relationship to nature remotely close to how they do in this reality, sign me up!

Thanks again for writing such a nice and meaningful post.

OK, to finish this post with FE, the ego, and the soul…

I recently wrote on challenges to the ego that FE presents, and no need to belabor it, but I really do not know of an issue that can get people's egos all spun up more than FE can. The arrival of FE will be the biggest event in the human journey, by far. Nothing remotely like it ever happened before. Quadrillions of dollars barely scratches the surface of FE's potential, and the only people that I have seen successfully navigate that minefield had their hearts in the right place to start with, such as Dennis, Brian, and Mr. Professor. If they did not have the highest integrity, they would not have lasted five minutes.

But none of them really understood the epochal nature of FE, not like I present in my big essay. When I wrote that "big picture" part of that DOE proposal that Brian asked me to write with him, you can definitely see glimmers of my big essay in it, but in the five years after writing that proposal, I went far deeper into the issue, and it was only while writing my big essay that the truly epochal significance of FE hit me. If it took me that long to really see it, I certainly cannot expect my readers to quickly understand. This is going to be a long haul for a few reasons, but it will be worth it.

As I have stated, giving up our scarcity-based teddy bears scares most people, and they do not want to let go of them, and I cannot blame them, not really. That is partly why not only will the masses not wake up with talk, but I really do not want to even try with them. Been there, done that. They will begin waking up if FE is delivered into their lives, and it is kind of cruel to try to get them to wake up before then. It does not mean that those who can wake up earlier and join the choir are any better, but only means that they are further along the path, like an adult is further along the path than an infant.

The choir is going a place for older souls, because only they are going to have much interest in it. To the rest of the planet (except for our friend Godzilla), we will be doing crazy and inconsequential stuff, best ignored, at least until FE arrives, either through our efforts or somebody else's. Only then will it begin to make sense to them. Judging them in their limited awareness is not productive and is an ego-trap. We were all there once, too. And as hard as it may be to believe, given a free choice, many on the planet today would choose to incarnate here, and they will. But, if today's masses could really see what we are on the brink of manifesting, how many would really say, "Screw that, give me more war and a life of quiet desperation!" I'll bet it would not be many, and I guess that I am gambling that that will be the case, but I do not desire to force it on anybody. In this world, for those who want to keep playing kill-or-be-killed, perhaps a continent can be set aside for them to duke it out, if Earth will have them. But the vast majority would willingly sign on for heaven on Earth. Maybe I am wrong, but I am trying to find out.

Back to chores.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Between chores…

In my previous post, I mentioned those scientists who try to sell materialism to the masses. I know that materialism is a false faith to begin with, but what are the attractions to the masses? None that I can see, unless you admire sterile logic operating on false assumptions that end up begging the question.

Similarly, Peak Oilers promote a "vision" of austerity and depopulating Earth because we are running out of hydrocarbon energy. I also know that they are operating from a false assumption, as FE technology is on the planet today. It is even more bizarre in Heinberg's case, as he mentioned Sparky Sweet's technology in his writings, oil company organized suppression that I am intimately familiar with, and even the ET relationship to FE, and he is on-board with the inside-job aspect of 9/11, but declined a very friendly invitation from me to find out more about the very situations that he wrote about. I wanted to introduce him to Brian, and Heinberg ran away as fast as he could, and later said that there is no evidence that any alleged FE technology has ever worked.

With that performance, I understood when conspiracists accused Heinberg of working for Godzilla (and they have also accused Chomsky), but I do not see it that way. Heinberg's bizarre reaction was when I began seeing all of those reactions of fear and denial as a generalized addiction to scarcity. I think I am right, but those addicted to scarcity will not give up their addictions with talk. Imagine talking a heroin addict out of his addiction. The addiction can be a very subtle one, and the addictions of academics and scientists are only subtler than those that the masses have.

Back to chores.

Best,

Wade

[Nine]

Wade,

You have stated your belief that the powers or Godzilla or whatever one might refer to them as are in faction and disagreement.

We see this online on the supposed truth sites. Its all about war and the rumors of said wars and about the money system and how its reform will stop said wars but the truth of the matter is that the wars will continue since they are over the limited hydro carbon resources left upon this planet.

We see much conflicting information even here on Avalon. The folks here are very nice but of that New Age religion. My opinion is that much of it comes from intel agencies.

Much New age material is similar to what I was subjected to in the evangelical christian movement such as the concept of Armageddon. But really what humanity faces is sort of an Armageddon moment if some constructive action is not taken....

"Do people who embrace doom and reject possible salvation feel unworthy?"

from you Wade...

It says in Christian evangelicalism that one is saved merely by repeating the sinner's prayer....

You must admit you are a sinner and repent or to turn your path....

Or to die in horrible judgement....

this is a great example of the message...

http://peacewithgod.net/mobile/?gcli...FYtAMgodLWEAAw

Its kind of tough seeing your point of view when believing stuff like that....dear Wade...

However, Evangelicalism and New Age doctrine is similar to me. Nor do I discount anyone's spiritual journey but I remain skeptical since I was really taken advantage of in the Christian community.

And so when searching for truth I look both without and within for the right path. Its interesting that Love seems to be the greatest power in the world and that all other paths lead to darkness and not the right path.

And so I am learning to not judge as to the path the other might choose since judgement in itself can lack love.

What is the end game without FE released and what if the American Empire defeats all comers and take it "all" what then?

It will be huge areas of the Earth as sacrifice zones.

I guess we get to choose Mordor or paradise....

Wade the way you put the problem it simply is a no brainer which way to go....

thanx

Nine

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Nine:

Being that we are both Americans, we know all about the Christian game, especially its evangelical arm. All organized religions are based on scarcity, as are all dominant ideologies on Earth. In a world of scarcity, all such ideologies are used by their "priesthoods" for organizational survival. Religion was actually the first such ideology, and it was born out of the need to survive warfare, so Europe's unity of religion and warfare that accompanied its rise had deep roots.

When farming made cities and professions possible, the first elites appeared by controlling the first markets (there has never been a free market), and the first professional priesthood entered into a Faustian deal by conferring divine status to elites. The priesthoods of all religions turned the teachings of masters into rackets, if any masters were involved at all. The stories that gird the Judeo-Christian religions are maybe 10% fact and 90% fiction, and there is little enlightenment to be found in them. The so-called New Age is just a retread of the old religions in modern garb, and yes, much of what passes for "current" events in New Age and conspiracist circles is invalid, to put it politely. There is a great deal of disinformation in those ranks, and yes, the intelligence agencies have something to do with it, but a lot is due to people's credulity. Human gullibility has been exploited since the dawn of humanity. New Age "gurus" using their positions to get paid and laid is a dynamic that is literally as old as civilization. So it is, in a world of scarcity.

I do not want to pick on the ideologists and fanatics of Christianity, Islam, Judaism, the New Age and conspiracist circles too much, as they are simply playing the same game as economists, historians, scientists, and other intellectual warriors of the ideologies that feed them. Everybody is playing the same game, of exploiting the gullible and undiscerning, of using people's abilities to think abstractly against them, and the like.

My data points are based on my experiences and those of my close fellow travelers, not New Age and conspiracist scuttlebutt. I do not even pay attention to that stuff anymore, as it is on the level of gossip. And focusing on it is giving our power away.

I know that FE, antigravity, and other technologies are on the planet today, and I have a pretty good idea of their potential, and I know that Godzilla is alive and vigilant, but currently conflicted. Those who gave my friend that underground show are from Godzilla's disenchanted faction that does not want to live on Mars in case Earth becomes uninhabitable. None of that comes from New Age or conspiracist circles, but what my close fellow travelers have reported, based on their experiences.

All of the religious, New Age, and conspiracist mumbo jumbo is not important and can serve as a distraction from what is. Many readers have not been discerning and think that my work is something that it is not, and that is a problem that people like me constantly encounter, and is one more reason why I am looking for needles in haystacks. Knowing Godzilla's latest machinations is not important. Understanding how our world really works, is. Godzilla and friends are only symptoms, not causes, and focusing on them is one more way to give away our power and play the victim. Even though I carried Dennis's and Brian's spears as they approached the DOE, I really wondered what they thought we would accomplish. FE newbies almost invariably begin banging on governmental, corporate, and NGO doors, thinking that there is somebody home. What deadly foolishness. Brian was beside himself when some FE newbies close to him began banging on the Pentagon's door.

I have seen it all in trying to make FE happen, and I have not seen anything that had a prayer, but I am besieged with people advocating those paths of failure. Just this morning, I was asked about Rossi for about the fiftieth time. Rossi has not even gotten on the playing field yet, and I do not want to watch another aspirant sally forth straight into Godzilla's maw.

I am trying the heart-centered sentience route, and we will see how it goes. Yes, given the direction that we are heading, and fast, I would think that the choice would be an easy one, but almost nobody will budge, as they have bought into the scarcity-based framework that feeds them, and abundance scares them. Looking for needles…

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

I woke up with a post in mind. I am a member of history's most privileged demographic group, and live in one of the most affluent and beautiful places on Earth, where I can stand in line behind the world's richest man. I have family that lives in Hawaii, and I have visited several times and hung out in Hawaii's most idyllic spots. Hawaii is the closest thing to an earthly paradise that ever existed. So, I have seen the best of what Earth and humanity has to offer, and each day, as I make my way to the store, to drive to go hiking (which I will do soon this morning ), or go to the movie theater where I ran into Gates (I went twice this past week), I look around me and think, "So, this is the pinnacle of civilization. Sigh." Homeless people beg on most busy intersections, everybody rushes off to their workdays, etc. I regularly read of rich celebrities saying where their favorite place on Earth is, and regularly I read "Manhattan." God, what a horrible place, and the rich and famous aspire to live there.

It is far from easy to know what can be and compare it to what is. The reason why FE newcomers invariably try to chat up their social circles about FE is that it is what they know. Social navigation has been the human line's primary predilection at least since monkeys, so social games are what people know best, but they are worthless for initiating epochal change. I regularly encounter people thinking that change comes from within social circles and social awareness, when social awareness and organization is an effect of the economic conditions, not a cause. I have written about this plenty on my site and at Avalon, and there is no need to belabor it, but people keep going to that well, thinking that is where epochal change will happen. It won't. Humanity will begin to wake up to abundance when FE is delivered into their lives, not before.

The world as we know it will end with the introduction of FE, and almost anybody who gives FE much thought at all quickly realizes it on some level, and their reaction then is denial and fear, almost every time (Levels 1, 2, 3, 5, and 8). I seek those needles in haystacks who do not react with denial and fear, and who can refrain from all of their "bright idea" stuff on how to make FE happen, which have always been along the lines of Levels 6, 7, 9, 10, and 11. Those approaches have never come close to working and are unlikely to, because in their own way, they are based in denial and fear. Love is the answer, as always.

It is easy to get sidetracked and begin hacking at branches. In my corporate life, I have continually encountered the mentality that can be expressed as, "I am too busy bailing to worry about patching the hole in the hull." I have watched huge organizations employing thousands sink beneath the waves, bailing to the end, ignoring my suggestions for patching the hull. It was not easy to watch, but it was only a microcosm of what is happening on Earth today. Everybody hacks at branches if they hack at all, because that is all that they see in their tunnel vision. Godzilla sees the big picture, or at least a global one, and keeping everybody mired in scarcity and survival, hacking at branches if they hack at all, is his game.

FE is the Big One, and everything else is noise.

Best,

Wade

[Limor Wolf]

Originally posted by Melinda (post 4100): "The downside to thinking about this is that I'd rather like to live in my self-sufficient FE home right now. Knowing I could recycle my waste, grow my own food, create and communicate globally using a tiny computer, all the while living in forest clearings beneath the shimmer of the stars. "

The world that you dream of in the future, is the one you already know, Melinda (as some here). It seems like a good time for us to invite that which already exists to enter this world in need. I am sitting in the second row in Wade's world, but want to help.

"Rediscovering the universe through the power we possess within. That is the future I see. "

Will join you ~

Limor

[truthseekerdan]

Hello All, got the following phrase from a Higher Source:

When humanity will Stop Believing in time/space... "We'll Become Immortal" -- in other words realize that we are love/light instead! Namaste and much wisdom to all 💜

[Melinda]

Posted by Limor (here)
...Will join you ~

Limor

Wonderful to hear Limor.

If we're still enjoying this physical realm, you can join me on my hover board

We can meditate - in our gratitude for the wide blue skies and the clear, thriving seas...

Knowing they are pure and clean and full of life, with all manner of creatures thriving in harmony in the waters, on the shores and deep in land. We can practice telekinesis and levitation, and joyful acts of kindness, hovering from here to there, without sound or pollution in the air. We can write poems and formulas and contemplate the stars, and laugh 'til we're hungry, then eat wholesome, life-giving foods, grown in or even above the earth. Then we'll dive into the ocean to spin with the dolphins, shimmering in the whales' song, and count the reams of coral lining the underwater world.


Bring a friend. Or just be one.


Much love to one and all...

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Attached are pics from today's hike. I have been making fall photo posts for nearly two months (1, 2, 3, 4, 5). Fall comes to the high country first, and today's photos are from a mountain in my backyard. It is mushroom season, as you can see. Autumn peaks here in my neighborhood in mid-November, and December and January are the "hard" winter months here (which are nothing compared to all places east of here at the same latitude, to the eastern seaboard), and in February, in a mild winter (and global warming is making them milder all the time), the blooms begin, and peak spring here is in the merry merry month of May. I sure cannot have any complaints. What a blessing to live here, and I have had my fair share in this lifetime of taking it all in on the trails. I now do winter hiking, and I will be a regular in the mountains in my backyard until about April, when the high country begins opening up again. But I had the last two summers off to hike, and I am not expecting that again.

Discussing my big essay's subject matter is what I am most interested in, and I have regularly seen financial people begin to understand the relationship between energy and economics, such as here. But they all are boxed in by the assumptions of conventional physics, oblivious to organized suppression, addicted to scarcity, and other limitations, which is why they are all Level 3s, and Level 3s are the most resistant to the idea of FE. Their plight is similar to materialists selling their faith: who really wants to sign on? Every time that I encounter Peak Oilers or other "downsizers" of humanity, in order for their plans to work, humanity would have to attain levels of sentience and integrity never before sniffed. Those downsizers talk up the "prosperous way down," in which depopulating the planet can be a pleasant ride, but I have never seen them make a convincing case for their plans, such as they are.

At the site linked to above, the author regularly disparaged technology as any kind of solution (or, perhaps more accurately disparaged any thinking that it can provide any real answers), when the entire human journey has been about technology, going back to the first stone tools and earlier. I doubt that any of them ever gave any thought to the Kardashev scale. I'll settle for us becoming a Level 1 Civilization, which FE would do.

I really do not want to focus on those who do not understand and actually treat FE as the enemy, but their growing understanding of the relationship between energy and economics is something long overdue. As you can tell by that presentation, energy is only one of three "E's," and the other two are economy and environment, but both of those arise from energy, so it is a somewhat misleading approach. Energy is the root, and ecosystems were about acquiring, preserving, and using energy, and economics is merely a human adjunct to how ecosystems operate. But, I suppose, the audience that people such as that site's author is trying to reach begin by thinking that money is real, so he takes them to energy via money, debt, and those other fictions. My essay comes from the opposite direction, beginning with the Sun's energy, and showing how it made everything happen, and how life's journey on Earth was an energy journey above all else, and humanity and its economy is merely the latest kid on the block. The game has changed in some ways in the human phase, but is fundamentally the same: an energy game. Everything else is of secondary importance. Going at it backwards like the author does may reach his audience in ways, but all the debt, money, and other ideas are really pretty meaningless in the big picture. It is only accounting between human groups, and nothing more.

Best,

Wade

[Melinda]

I came across a talk earlier today on the The Institute of Art and Ideas website, on the merits of Utopian visions.

The written description :

"Once a driving force of political change, utopian visions are now out of fashion. But is this a lost opportunity or a new realism? Should we create new utopias and thereby impel social advance, or will we learn the lessons of history and remain sceptical of grand visions?"

One panelist posited that looking back, the history of utopian experiments has been a history of failure - but noted that some utopian efforts (such as feminism) have achieved a great deal even if not yet realising their ideal goals.

She feared that technology would not answer our problems because the will (consciousness) wasn't there. She stated, as do many others globally, that we've long had the technology to cure poverty but not the will.

I understand that viewpoint. But I think if people are given localised, clean energy means to raise their own standard of living independently, motivation would surface in a way it hasn't done in the societal infrastructure we have currently - which is based largely on handouts, and corrupted institutions controlling the aid money and energy supply.

The political theorist on the panel suggested that we need more utopian visions to give people credible alternatives to the present state of affairs, and commented on Marx's frustration with a lack of realistic methods (amidst utopian thinking) to achieve a utopia in practice. Again, my thoughts turned to free energy and the way it can revolutionise infrastructure, giving us the tools for truly revolutionary methods.

It was the science-fiction novelist on the panel who reiterated the importance of clean technology and scientific innovation to take us forward, stating that utopia has gone from being a good idea to now being a necessary survival strategy. He also noted that science, with its pure intent, has been in conflict with capitalism, and that a lot of people who are 'anti-science' are more accurately anti-capitalist, but have yet to separate the strands.

He summed up with the comment :

"If you combine science as a thing that's demanding justice and moderation in our relationship to the biosphere, then you have a kind of utopian statement that I think is both realistic and also practical."

The mention in post #4174 of the Kardashev scale was yet another reminder of the need to combine imagination with technological innovation to see our way forward. Knowing our history is vital. But using it as our only frame of reference can lead to chasing our tails. Kardashev is an astronomer, and used to gazing outside of the more usual earthly parameters.

I realise this isn't the kind of comprehensive research you're looking for Wade. But whenever I come across debates like this, there aren't many places to bring free energy into the discussion.

Lovely pics from your mountain walks.

[Nine]

Wade,

I am going through the links on your last post and I came across this:

"One question has dominated my alternative energy quest: “Do we have to have enlightenment before we can have new energy, or can its reality help catalyze it?” If scarcity was eliminated as a concept, how would people react? Would we all get fatter and lazier and greedier, or might we see a new dawn of the human potential? Many believe that humanity has to experience Armageddon before we collectively “get it.” I hope that is not the case. My studies have shown me that the greatest cognitive and social changes were a result of the energy regime changes, not a cause. "

From your hooked on Scarcity article. BTW I enjoyed it immensely! Did I mention that it made much sense?

However, it seems that those that control FE and any release are in that power structure be it public or private or both. I am sure your writings get read by some of these folks. And I am quite sure that few will read your works and so there is safety in numbers as in the few in number.

Did you know that in your works your links are what fills in a lot of holes for my lack of proper education, you see I am an American....

America is a racket....still love her though and much potential is here in its people....

I got Ozzy playing while reading.

What can I say....

Wade this is beyond post grad work IMO....

Let me see, I will go to the next social gathering and say hey...America is a Racket and there is free energy for all.....

What do you think would happen mentioning either of those two?

Now lets think about the internet and how this is here on my screen and I get to read it for my connection charge of 67 dollars a month? I mean post grad work on philosophy, religious studies, Biology and some lite earth sciences for connecting the dots for the big picture.

How many energy slaves did it take to produce my full carbon "cross" bicycle? And of course the bigger picture of how the polluting industries were for the most part moved out of the country and goods like that fine machine that I ride on came back very cheap.....and we have paths and trails all over a mostly unspoiled country to roam and ride upon....a benefit of the racket....

thanx Wade....


Nine

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Melinda:

Nah, that was a good post. I may even contact them. I throw my line in the water at places like that. Not that I ever get much in the way of nibbles, but I throw my line in when it looks like there might be some life. Almost all the time, however, such venues are not places where its members can grok FE, as they are usually abodes of Level 3s.

My work has always been two-fold regarding FE. Something like Utopia is indeed possible with FE, but the other possibility is perhaps more "reasonable" to many people: averting the Sixth Mass Extinction that could take us with it. As with so many other areas of my work, in which I straddle (or integrate) the poles, most people fixate on one pole or the other, and either obsess over them or deny them. That kind of polarity fixation does not seem healthy, as well as the obsession or denial, and I do not recommend it. It is similar to the structuralist/conspiracist divide. As far as I have seen, fear is behind those reactions of fixation or denial, and only a loving perspective can integrate them.

That FE can accomplish both goals you might think would mean that everybody looking for answers is poking into the FE bush at least a little, but that is not how it works. Those who say they are looking for answers, or are trying to provide some, are usually the fiercest assailants of FE and its potential. Again, you probably have to see it to believe it. It is a cousin to almost nobody seeing the connection between energy and economy, in which you have a hard time understanding how people can be that way, but they are. As I have written, that Venus Project guy blew a gasket at Brian's dinner table when Brian mentioned FE. That is the typical reaction of "visionaries" to the idea of FE.

Again, those reactions of denial and fear probably have to be seen to be believed, and anybody in the FE field for long knows them well. After several years of witnessing those reactions, from leading voices (and I mean foremost authorities in the world on those topics) in the fields of the environment, alternative energy, and physics, Brian began to openly wonder if humanity was a sentient species, and I sadly understood his query.

When I updated my essays this year, to align with my big essay, I updated Michael Ruppert's fate. When I contacted him back in 2003, he at least had the grace to reply, and did not reply with the stark denial or even ridicule that others usually do, but said that he might get around to reading my work one day. I doubt that he did, and he beat the Peak Oilers' drums of doom to his death, and even committed suicide in his despair. I have written it plenty, that I have watched people embrace certain death rather than question their indoctrination, so Ruppert's suicide makes sense, rather sadly.

So, we will see how it goes with contacting them. Again, if you were a "visionary" and thought that Utopia was possible and even desirable, one might think that if I approached you with the tools to make it possible, that you would be doing backflips, but I have yet to see it work out that way.

Hi Nine:

In the section where that question is that you cite, I mentioned that I answered the question in my big essay: FE will come first, and the raising awareness second, just like with the previous Epochal Events. If you go to a social gathering thinking to preach the FE gospel, be prepared to be ostracized. I have seen careers and relationships end when people began to evangelize the FE issue to their social circles. Since your career is over, I guess that there is no risk to your career. But I advise extreme caution on evangelizing, in our land of proselytizers, whether it is their religion, their nationalism, or their capitalism. The social circle approach has never come close to working for the FE issue, and I doubt that it will, and is dangerous to those proselytizing. I am trying something different.

Time for chores.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

One more thought came to mind, which I will touch on before I begin my day's chores. While my big essay touches on what can seem to be a bewildering array of topics, the purpose is for people to begin developing comprehensive perspectives, and when they do, energy will be front and center, and my goal is for readers to develop an epochal perspective regarding FE. Without a comprehensive perspective, that epochal perspective will probably not form. They are intimately related, which is why I wrote that essay the way that I did.

As I have written, it is probably easier if somebody comes to my work from orthodoxy, as people from the fringes usually drag their fringe predilections with them, which are rarely valid, but people tend to fixate on their pet fringe orientation and try to filter everything through it. That orientation distracts them from seeing the bigger picture, whether it is some conspiracist flavor of the day, such as the moon landings, the way out fringe on 9/11, trying to identify the JFK conspirators, various New Age topics, literalist interpretations of ancient texts, Velikovskian catastrophic theory, esoteric uses of megalithic elite architecture left behind by collapsed civilizations (and the idea that they "ascended"), and other topics that comprise the chaff in the fringes. Virtually all of that is meaningless distraction. I have seen many people who otherwise might understand the FE issue in its comprehensive fullness get spun up on the chaff. It was usually because they were scientifically illiterate and did not exercise any discernment. They could not tell when such hypotheses had been falsified and it was time to fold their tents. I do not want to pick on them too much, because scientists suffer from the same failing, and their failures are more deadly, as they are supposedly on the leading edge of figuring out how the world works. That is similar to the deadliness of scholars who heroify Columbus.

If people really want to help FE manifest via work like mine, they need to leave their pet theories and enthusiasms at the door, because even if they had much validity (and they rarely do), they are rarely relevant to the FE pursuit.

OK, now it is time for chores.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Ah, I can't help myself. One more observation on the fringes. When Brian had his mystical awakening, which was very valid, he left orthodoxy over the next decade, and as he wrote, his departure was with a whimper, not a bang. As Brian was being gradually shown the door, he began investigating the fringes, and it was not long before he was sucked into the Face on Mars controversy. He was once arguably the world's foremost Mars expert, which lent heft to the controversy, but Brian eventually saw that Hoagland cooked the data in making his Cydonia case, and Brian largely dissociated himself from the issue before that image came back in 1998, but the Cydonia issue dogged Brian to the end of his life. I had to go to battle regarding his Wikipedia biography when an editor tried to make the case that Brian concluded that the Face was artificial, when Brian never did anything of the sort.

That situation highlighted the perils of somebody like Brian even addressing such issues, as people would try to put words in his mouth and turn him into a political football, and nothing gave him more pain than ten seconds of an interview about Cydonia in which he was "ambushed" (his words) by the interviewers into giving his views on the moon landings. Brian had very good reason to doubt the official story on space matters, as he nearly lost his life poking into the UFO issue, courtesy of the USA's military, but he really did not do his homework on the moon landings. He did have rather odd reactions when he asked his moonwalking astronautic brethren about their experiences on the moon, but he let that sway him into thinking that there might be more to the "faked" aspect of the moon landings than there really was.

Before I wrote his Wikipedia biography, his stance on the moon landings dominated the bio, and I felt that we would likely never be able to get rid of it, and Brian wrote his final statement on the issue, which truly turned out to be final, as he died a few months later. After his death, I approached all of the prominent people in the moon landings debate, as well as the most prominent UFO people, as far as the military connection went, and not one of them would help me get Brian's statement placed somewhere prominent so that Wikipedia's "editors" would stop erasing it. That was another example of personal integrity being the world's scarcest commodity. I was so happy when that entire moon landings section of his Wikipedia biography was erased as "unsourced conspiracy text," and I can live with Brian's bio as it stands today.

If Brian had done his homework, he would have understood how utterly bogus the "faked" claims were, and would not have gotten sucked into that controversy. He regretted those ten seconds of that interview to his grave. Because I no longer directly interact with the public, I no longer have to put up with the faked moon landings issue, which, like the idea that Earth is flat, will probably never go away. Bizarrely, I was recently told that my moon landings presentation actually makes a strong case for faked moon landings! That demonstrates the lack of discernment that I refer to on the fringes. People who read my moon landings section and conclude that the moon landings were faked have no business poking their noses into the issue. The fringes are full of that kind of chaff-dining.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

OK, one more little post on Brian and the moon landings. He got Buzz Aldrin a job and shared an office with him, and Brian and Ed Mitchell were very active in Greer's Disclosure Project, and Brian and Ed were both deeply into exploring the nature of consciousness. Those two were certainly among the moonwalkers that Brian would have asked about their lunar experiences. Buzz and Ed both came back from the moon pretty messed up. Greer stated that Neil Armstrong wanted to speak out on the UFOs that he and Buzz encountered on Apollo 11, but was threatened into silence, which I know is standard operating procedure.

So, the odd ("perfunctory") reactions that Brian received from his astronautic brethren about their lunar experiences had other reasons for them than being that they were part of some effort to fake the landings. But that, combined with Brian's near-fatal experiences poking into UFOs, and the fact that he had not really done his homework on the moon landings evidence (Brian readily acknowledged that the craft went to the moon and orbited it (they were easily seen from Earth), but that they may not have landed), led to Brian's speculations that the moon landings may have been faked. They were just that, speculations, and if Brian had dug into the evidence like I did, he would have never given that TV crew those ten seconds that haunted him to his grave and beyond. It is nice to see that controversy dying out, as Brian did not want to be remembered as the astronaut who doubted that we landed on the moon.

Best,

Wade