WADE FRAZIER : A Healed Planet

[Wade Frazier]

Ho, ho, ho:

As I have written recently, it is increasingly looking like it will be Hillary versus Jeb in 2016, and it is surreal. I was just reading another article this morning on it, and it has been getting plenty of mainstream coverage lately (1, 2, 3), as well as some fringe coverage and sober assessment (1, 2). What the Bushes and Clintons have in common is being Rockefeller toadies, just like all presidents since JFK. The Rockefellers and other robber barons have owned virtually all American presidents since the late 1800s. Nothing advertises the complete bankruptcy of the USA's political system more than Hillary versus Jeb in 2016. As Bucky Fuller said, there are not any political solutions to humanity's problems, and especially in the USA.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

I have been making essay tweaks lately, but just tiny ones, and they will be reflected in this choir Q&A.

Q: Wade, I have long followed progressive prescriptions for the way out of this mess, and they discuss the concept of sustainability, but you discuss abundance instead. What really is the difference?

A: In a word, energy. My big essay could be said to be devoted to understanding the concept of energy in not only the journey of life on Earth, including the human journey, but also so that people can understand the difference between sustainable and abundant, and I draw about as big a picture as I think that anybody can on the subjects, and here is a summary, with the concepts of sustainable and abundant in mind.

Virtually all energy used on Earth today comes from two sources. The first is radioactivity from decaying elements inside Earth, which were created when a star collapsed in our galactic vicinity and provided the raw materials for our solar system. The hydrogen largely coalesced to form the Sun, and nuclear fusion in the Sun is the other source of energy. Cosmic rays hitting our solar system provide negligible energy.

Life appeared when Earth cooled down enough so that stable molecular structures could form that provided the basis of Earth's life, somewhat less than four billion years ago. Relatively quickly, earliest life learned to exploit energy gradients in chemicals and it soon developed enzymes, to speed up reactions. Not too long after that, some biological structures were used in a new way, to capture sunlight energy, and that soon became the predominant method of acquiring energy. Not too long after that, a photosynthesizer learned to split water to get its electrons to power its processes, and oxygen was the waste product. Earth then began a slow process that lasted billions of years, of being oxygenated. That process saved Earth's ocean from being lost to space, which would have brought an abrupt halt to the experiment called life on Earth.

Life had numerous energy events, in interaction with Earth's chemical and physical systems, which led to organisms that learned to use the oxygen in their respiration. Complex cells developed, which led to multicellular organisms, and when the ocean became oxygenated, the rise of animals commenced. Suddenly, animals became large, as size presented a survival advantage, and life's arms war began in earnest. Life in the oceans (and eventually land) went through booms that have been called "golden ages," which eventually turned into busts called mass extinctions. Both were energy events: one of plenitude, and the other an energy crash. Throughout those booms and busts, life evolved into larger and more sophisticated forms, and a typical pattern was that marginal creatures in one golden age became the next dominant animals after a mass extinction ended the reign of the previous regime. It especially happened with animals, but also happened with plants. The reptiles that became mammals were dominant before the greatest mass extinction ever, but after that extinction, the reptiles that became dinosaurs rose to dominance, and mammals became fringe dwellers. A bolide event wiped out the dinosaurs and its relatives, and with the global slate wiped clean, those fringe-dwelling mammals became the next dominant class of animals. Some mammals learned to live in trees and partnered with flowering plants. Some became primates, and others became rodents. Among primates, the losers of arboreal life migrated from the treetops and became ground-dwelling apes. Eventually some loser apes were pushed out of the rainforest, dwelt on its edge, and learned to walk upright to secure far-flung energy (AKA food) sources, which eventually led to a creature that used its hands to make tools in a way never done before, as its brain became relatively gigantic. Before long, it learned to control fire, which was the greatest energy event yet seen among animals, which allowed that ape to eventually dominate Earth.

While growing large was a great advantage for plants and animals and a great investment of energy, humans learned to exploit those energy stores, and the first great human migration that allowed it to conquer Earth was achieved at the expense of the world's large animals and all other human species. During that phase, humanity's population increased by a factor of a thousand. After the easy energy was gone, then humans learned to domesticate plants, and civilization developed across the planet. The global human population increased by another thousand-fold since plants were domesticated.

Very similar to the booms and busts of the journey of life on Earth, human civilizations have boomed and busted. There have generally been two scientific camps on those busts: one was environmental change, droughts in particular, and the other did not deny environmental change, but believed that humans had a hand in those changes through its methods, mainly of deforestation and soil destruction, which only exacerbated inherently unsustainable energy practices. A similar situation exists regarding the extinction of the easy meat: one camp argues that climate change did it, while the other argues that humans did it and that climate change likely had minimal effects. I noticed that climate change advocates had a conflict of interest as they absolved humanity from having any contribution to its fate. The scientific consensus on the megafauna extinctions has increasingly been deciding that human agency was by far the most prominent variable, and humans destroying their energy supplies via deforestation and soil destruction have risen to prominence as the dominant explanation for early civilization collapses. Humanity's agency in its own demise just makes sense. Nothing ever exploited energy like humans could, and humans virtually never did it with any foresight, but grabbed all the energy they could until it ran out, just like any other animal. It happened with the easy meat, forests and soils, and today extends to the fossil fuels that power the industrialized world. It is just another example of short-sighted humanity.

Some Stone Age cultures, after the easy meat was gone, developed what could be called sustainable energy sources. Sometimes it was just taking advantage of an energy flow, such as the Pacific Northwest culture that depended on salmon for half of its calories and they could sustainably exploit incredibly thick forests. Several biomes in the Western Hemisphere were sustainably harvested by humans, and humans even terraformed some soils. But wherever civilization appeared, the familiar pattern of the Old World was repeated, and early civilizations in the Western Hemisphere collapsed. In Australia, they never even achieved plant domestication. Deforestation and agriculture were almost never really sustainable, even though there were early "golden ages" of relative abundance. What invariably happened was that human populations quickly grew to the land's carrying capacity under the new energy regime, and because those methods were never really sustainable, the population collapsed, and booming and busting civilizations were the norm across the planet.

Humanity's population has increased by nearly an order of magnitude since industrialization began, and as we run out of fossil fuel energy, the "progressive" solution being advocated by Peak Oil and environmental advocates is to bring humanity's population back to Earth's carrying capacity before industrialization, which necessitates a 90% depopulation of Earth. In some ways, one might be able to call the world advocated by those activists "sustainable," but it would be based on austerity. People such as Bucky Fuller stated that visions based on shared austerity have never worked, and I agree.

The greatest era of prosperity in the human journey ended with the first energy crisis experienced by history's richest nation, and that spurred me and some fellow travelers, who eventually became my allies, to pursue solutions to humanity's energy predicament. My eventual partner sold the best heating system that has ever been on the world market, and made the biggest run at bringing alternative energy to the marketplace that has yet been attempted. He discovered the hard way that the world's energy markets are rigged affairs, but markets have been rigged since the very first ones. There is no such thing, and there has never been, a free market. It is only a useful fiction for promoting the rapacious economic system called capitalism. We also discovered during our adventures that technology that taps a new energy source – the background energy of the universe – is older than I am, but global elites have sequestered those technologies, wiped out any independent attempts to develop them, and the public is largely oblivious to that situation. Intellectuals deny that situation on the "laws of physics" and "conspiracy theory" grounds, but they do it very irrationally, and seem addicted to scarcity and afraid of abundance.

My realities of my journey and those of my fellow travelers have been simply unbelievable to the masses, but they were all too real. The incredible and the preposterous became our daily companions, while humanity races to oblivion.

The bottom line is that the "sustainable" solutions presented by various progressives are anything but abundant, particularly when a 90% depopulation of Earth is how their plan begins. If those energy technologies that we know exist became used by the public, concepts such as Earth's carrying capacity and carbon footprint would become meaningless. Under an abundance paradigm, even Earth's ecosystems would not be commandeered and exploited by humans, but an unprecedented relationship to nature could begin.

All of my fellow travelers also had a mystical awakening that propelled them on their journeys, and what I noticed, with my studies and adventures, was that scarcity and fear were joined at the hip, as were love and abundance. It really is a conflict of paradigms. More than 99% of humanity currently reacts with denial and fear to the idea of those new energy technologies and what they can make possible. For those who accept the idea of those energy technologies and their potentially beneficial effects, so far, denial and fear have permeated their efforts to develop those technologies, which have doomed them, even if global elites were not actively suppressing any efforts that became successful or threatened to be. I finally came to understand that any effort to develop and disseminate those technologies had to be grounded in at least the concept of love and abundance if they were going to stand a chance of success, and my efforts for the past decade have been focused on that approach.

So, sustainable and abundant are two very different concepts, but I regularly see them confused. Since scarcity is all that humanity has known, other than some briefs periods of relative abundance, almost nobody on Earth today is able or willing to even try to understand what abundance means. But if 0.0001% of humanity woke up, understood, and combined their sentience, the transition to global abundance would be easily accomplished. That is what I am trying to do. All Epochal Events in the human journey were initiated by a relative handful of people, and probably a literal handful for the earliest events, and I do not see why it will be different with this greatest of all Epochal Events.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Q: Wade, you mention your many surprises on your journey. Did they have anything in common?

A: As I think back, I guess that you could say that what they all had in common was a lack of personal integrity in humanity, which was my journey's primary lesson, but they had many subtle facets that did not become evident until I really began to dig into them and had many years of experiencing them. It was many years before I realized that what they all had in common were scarcity and fear. The pattern that I eventually recognized and its seeming causes were as follows.

Fear is a survival mechanism, and in mammals, fear shuts down the neocortex, as the fight-or-flight response kicks in. The carrots and sticks of socialization far predate the appearance of humanity, and can be seen in monkeys, for instance, which display crude forms of human politics. So, many behaviors that I saw and was amazed by seemed to literally be pre-sentient behaviors, as people acted out from their social programming. When they did that, they did not really seem capable of rational thought, but just parroted their conditioning. I watched people choose certain death over questioning their conditioning, so people's allegiance to their conditioning even overcame their survival instincts. That is some deep conditioning.

I began to see it when I was 12 when my family changed its diet to preserve my father's health, and I was initially shocked at the hostile reactions that I received when I told people what we did and why. So, I began learning young, and when I had my mystical awakening at 16 and became quite the mystical student, it was initially dismaying to see my growing mystical understandings be attacked by both religion and science. I could even see as a teenager that both camps worshipped their dogmas, but that neither dogma really had much to do with reality, but was their contrived worldview that would be invalidated by having mystical experiences, so those camps either denied or demonized such experiences. They chose beliefs that fed them over a pursuit of the truth gained from experience. I was also in training to be a scientist, so navigating that terrain was quite a kaleidoscopic experience. As I think back to those days, in some ways I should have seen what was coming, but during the dozen years after changing my studies from science to business, because a desperate prayer was answered, I learned the most valuable lessons of my lifetime. I had many surprises in many ways, and as I have written many times, it was the attacks from friends and family that shocked me the most. You could not have convinced me of that when I was 16, 19, or even 27.

As I staggered away from my home town, radicalized, I realized that however I was taught how the world worked was likely highly inaccurate, and I spent all of my spare time in the succeeding years performing the study and writing that became my website today. I estimate that it took the equivalent of seven years of full-time effort, scattered over a quarter-century, to create it. My paradigm had largely been set back in 1990, as far as knowing the key problems that humanity faced (the enemy is us), but the next generation saw me fill in many blanks, reach new paradigmatic understandings, and I was finally able to generalize what I was seeing. The basic dynamic is as follows.

We have lived in a world of scarcity and fear from the beginning, and all humans have been indoctrinated into their in-group ideologies from infancy. Some come early, and some come later, but by adulthood, all of those dominant ideologies have been received and digested. Those ideologies form worldviews for their adherents, and in science those frameworks are called paradigms. Those paradigms are how their adherents make sense of their worlds, and the vast majority of their adherents will fiercely cling to those paradigms to their deaths, even when clinging to their paradigms means their death. You could not have convinced me of that before I began witnessing it happen before my eyes.

I finally decided that what those ideologies all had in common was being based on an assumption of scarcity, but they promised their adherents material rewards and egocentric strokes. That combination of belly and emotional/ideological conditioning has proven nearly invincible for experience, reason, and the like to unseat them, even when adhering to them meant certain death.

I also found that each successive dominant in-group ideology was a little more sophisticated than the previous one, but each was still rooted in scarcity and fear, and abusing the out-group in favor of the in-group, although the in-group has grown over time. While religious ideologies resembled fairy tales, so did nationalist and imperialist ideologies, and even the economic ideologies were built on fairy tales. So, the leading ideologies on Earth were all based on fairy tales. Scientists have training to see past those fairy tales, but only became trapped by subtler and more seductive fairy tales, which again were proof against experience, logic, etc.

The materialism that grips scientists is also behind their denial that that novel energy source even exists. After several years of trying to interest his colleagues in the idea of free energy, my astronaut pal openly wondered if humanity was a sentient species. So, what surprised me was how nearly everybody sold out their sentience on behalf of the in-group ideologies that they were indoctrinated into from a young age. In the end, it seemed to be an emotional dynamic that completely bypasses the neocortex, as fear ruled their minds. And as long as we live in fear and scarcity, it always will.

So, many of the surprises of my journey, in which humanity's seeming blindness and stupidity were breathtaking, I finally came to understand was just their allegiance to what fed them. I have called it digging into their niche of hell and not budging, while my astronaut pal called it "digging in their heels," and I think that the best way to view it is abdicating their sentience for the promise of security, which they will ride all the way to their graves. I have constantly seen free energy newcomers scratch their heads that the masses cannot seem to understand ideas that should be easily grasped, such as the idea that our entire industrial era is riding a huge energy wave. Most people do not even begin to understand energy's role in it, as hard as that can be to believe. So, my surprises were generally all around how despicably and irrationally people could act, but I eventually understood that it was all just allegiance to their bellies and egos. Once that framework is understood, then there were few surprises, and what you definitely come to understand is that there is no way on Earth that the masses will even begin to understand the idea of abundance before the means to it are delivered into their lives. It also does no good to judge them in their allegiance to their bellies and egos; almost nobody on Earth has ever broken that death grip. If you want to judge anything, judge our species, but I think that that is a trap, too. I seek people who will at least try to break free of their conditioning, and if enough of us can, then something that looks a lot like heaven on Earth can come into view. It will not fall into our laps, however, but must be pursued. There will be nothing easy about it.

So, those are what my surprises had in common.

Best,

Wade

[Chris Gilbert]

Posted by Wade Frazier (here)
Ho, ho, ho:

One reason why I have made thousands of posts at Avalon is that if FE ever makes it past the organized suppression and the public's inertia, and the biggest event in the human journey arrives, Dennis's and Brian's odysseys will become quite famous, and professional biographers and historians are going to be mining this thread and my site for information, and I am trying to ensure that my writings will be available to the public as long as there is an Internet. So, I am not only doing this for the benefit of today's readers, but future biographers and historians. But if we don’t get over the FE hump, there may not be a future civilization anyway.

Best,

Wade

I was thinking to myself recently about how the choir and these discussions could still play a major role even if FE was introduced onto the world stage by others.

At times I've felt depressed about my online research and discussion activity, wondering if it will ever make any difference. Further contemplation however caused a vision to come to mind of how the internet is becoming the brain and nervous system of the human world. Even if we seemingly have limited material means to effect change, the ones who do control suppressed technology are likely monitoring discussions of this nature, and perhaps enlightening discussion has a greater butterfly effect than outward appearances would suggest.

It makes sense to me that garage tinkerer or hero inventor approaches won't work. Even in terms of more conventional technology one can find plenty of videos of prototype cars made by garage inventors with higher MPG or fuel sources other than gas, but they never seem to get patented or invested in beyond the prototype stage.

I think it's quite likely that the "white hats" in the shadows will eventually be the ones to start gradually bringing FE into the light as environmental and financial conditions worsen, but along the way there will be an attempt to integrate it into the current government and security state for purposes of increased psychotronic monitoring and control. In that sense the choir would play a key role, as it would help steer the implementation in a better direction and correct false assumptions.

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Enishi:

I could spend a day replying to your post, but here is the short version.

I never really conceived of my effort as being the missing piece to make FE happen. I was trying to fill some holes that I witnessed in the failed efforts that I was a part of, heard about through fellow travelers, read about, etc. There was not an aware and engaged public, and those that became involved were scientifically illiterate and looking for heroes, and Dennis obliged them. What a disaster that turned out to be, repeatedly. One hero, no matter how amazing, cannot get it done. I think that Dennis's belief in a messianic religion has something to do with that, and FE aspirants are regularly overcome by the magnitude of the effort, and greed, delusions of grandeur, and the like take over.

Other FE newcomers watch those tawdry spectacles, and a largely oblivious public, and they think that organized suppression can be snuck past, as they must be as oblivious as the public, right? Wrong, big time. The people at the top know very well the game they are playing and what the leverage points are. You can take it to the bank that both the White Hats and Black Hats are aware of my efforts, and have been aware since the 1980s, but they generally just watch. I just let them do their thing while I do my thing. They may try to impact what I am doing, positively or negatively, but I really don't pay attention and plow forward. They may make various plays to promote or hinder, but I cannot plan for what they will or will not do, and know that if I found 5,000-7,000 singers who learned the song, that FE would be a done deal. Lone voices in the wilderness can never get it done, no matter how on-key and loud.

If what I am trying to get going is not the missing piece, it is certainly a missing piece. Garage heroes will never get it done. I am not exaggerating when I say that tens of thousands of garage heroes have taken a run at it, all the way from high-MPG stuff to FE. None have ever gotten remotely close to the finish line. The "lucky" ones got the Golden Handcuffs, and the unlucky ones suffered an array of life-wrecking and life-ending fates. Those with gizmos featured on YouTube and elsewhere are about the equivalent of five-year-old boys thinking that they can play in the NFL.

Yes, the Internet's potential is unprecedented, and I am trying to take advantage of its potential. Nobody has tried what I am doing, and we will see how it goes. I wish that mine was only one effort of many like it (which would greatly increase the odds of success), but right now it is a lonely journey.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

I am seeing these kinds of geopolitical and media analyses these days, as well as the oil games. Ominous times, obviously, although you would never know it by the record stock markets and easy money policies. A dark night is coming. Of course, with FE, the nightmare can pass.

Q: Wade, what kinds of findings are coming from DNA testing? How reliable are they?

A: All kinds, of varying levels of reliability and interpretive validity. This is a young science, and there is often great dispute over today's findings. I see it turning out like other sciences as they grow older, in that as the data and techniques become more robust, a lot of the current controversy will eventually fade. Today, DNA testing is being used in myriad ways, and is being used with human DNA in many ways, from paternity testing to determining a person's ancestry to trying to determine if, how, and when ancient human migrations happened. It is used for determining criminality and the fate of human populations. Numerous variables have to be accounted for, such as the founder effect, which complicates testing and has led to a great deal of controversy. There are numerous popular misconceptions, and some DNA results have proven to be far blunter instruments than how they were originally envisioned, such as "molecular clock" usage. Many descent relationships between extinct species and today's have been clarified via DNA testing. The tools and data exist, and over time, this will become a far more developed science than it is today. It really is a fascinating time, when a new tool opens up new vistas of research and study, kind of like how mass spectrometers allowed for many kinds of tests, which opened new doors. The techniques and technology will improve, and hypothesis testing will improve the science. New horizons await.

Q: What has been the significance of the size issue in the journey of life on Earth?

A: Size has been a highly important issue over the eon of complex life and before, and it has always been intimately related to the energy issue. The complex cell could not have formed if not for the energy innovation of a bacterium becoming a mitochondrion, which became the power plant for complex cells and allowed them to grow immensely larger than prokaryotic cells. Complex life would not have appeared on Earth without that innovation. The seemingly sudden appearance of large animals in the Cambrian Explosion shows how important the size issue was. Animals got as big as they could, as fast as they could, and all the animal body plans and their attendant organs came into existence then, and have not changed since then. Bigger was better, as it conferred survival advantages.

However, big could also spell doom. In virtually all mass extinctions, the big ones went out, and previously small, marginal creatures grew large and filled the void. This happened over and over, and the one most important to humans was the asteroid that wiped out almost all archosaurs, including dinosaurs, and left Earth open for the rise of mammals. It took 25 million years, but mammals reached their maximum size, and some even rivaled dinosaurs in size, and for the next 40 million years, large mammals dominated all inhabitable continents, until an animal came along that could mine the energy in megafauna flesh, and humans quickly drove nearly all of Earth's large animals to extinction. So, that advantage that animals continually strove for became a fatal disadvantage once again.

Size and islands has been a highly interesting subject, as large animals became small, and small animals became large. When plants left water and colonized land, they also learned the advantages of size, and trees are the largest organisms ever. Once again, that advantage became an extinctive disadvantage when humans began to mine the energy of trees. Humanity has reduced Earth's plant biomass by a third since the beginnings of agriculture.

Even today, larger men have advantages over smaller men, so size is still an issue. Earth's small people are small due to energy. When Japan began to ingest Western levels of calories and nutrients, Japanese women went from dainty to Western-size within a generation. With FE, all humans would quickly reach about the same size, and my hope would be that the forests could regenerate and large animals could make their reappearance. Competitive games would also likely end, so there would be no NBA careers for giants, but nobody would mind.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

I have written that I was raised in a racist household, and it took me a few years to put racism behind me, but it is something that I will always have to live with and be vigilant of, because I was conditioned that way. Unfortunately, I have studied the Jewish Holocaust at length and watched quite a few documentaries. I remember an interview with a German woman who was raised by a Nazi father in the 1930s, and she said that nearly every day her father would show her a picture of a Jew and drill it into her head what Jews looked like, and she said that 50 years later, whenever she sees a Jew, her mind says, "There is a Jew." She said that she would probably take that reaction to her grave with her, as it was so beaten into her head as a child. In the USA, it is probably impossible for me to see somebody who is not white, even though white is a minority skin color in my neighborhood, without noticing that the person is not white. It will probably haunt me to my grave.

In Southern California, the racism was directed toward Mexican-Americans more than African-Americans, but I got plenty of both growing up, even though my friends included Mexican nationals and Mexican-Americans and my first employer was black. Being raised in history's most racist nation and growing up in the civil rights era was a trip, and the race riots that we see in the USA today have a very long pedigree. The same county that kangarooed Dennis into prison acquitted those police in the Rodney King beating trial, and the jury was stacked, as usual.

When Dennis was in jail, one of our dealers was from Ohio and sent Dennis cards while he was in jail, and was one of a handful of people who did not abandon Dennis while he was in jail. He was black, and if you met him, you would have thought that he was a college professor. He is in my pantheon of good guys, and we were friends. When I was briefly back with Dennis in 1996-1997, and people like Mr. Skeptic arrived on the scene, I continually had to deal with "skepticism" of what happened in Ventura. Of course, with my own mother taking a scrapbook tour of her son the criminal, I was all-too-used to the treatment, and Mr. Skeptic, while I was being friendly with him, really seemed dense, unable to really understand what happened, and he constantly tried seeing things the prosecution's way, and I watched him steadily go off the deep end, from a friendly "skepticism" that just could not seem to imagine that corruption could exist in the USA to eventually calling Dennis's "claims" of "persecution" a "delusion" to eventually libeling Dennis and never letting up, as he made up new lies when his old ones were exposed. I eventually decided that I was probably watching a professional at work, and it was educational. That he quietly folded his tents after Dennis was run out of the country is more evidence that his "skeptical" labors were performed as somebody's employee.

Mr. Skeptic was not the only person "skeptical" of what happened in Ventura, as many people had their establishment-worshipping delusions challenged by what happened. It was in those days that that black dealer told me an anecdote from his life. Not only did not he not fit the typical black mold (even today, there are not very many black professorial types in the USA), he married a white woman. He told me that he had experienced racial discrimination (especially with a white wife), which is no surprise to any black person in the USA, but he said that when he would relate instances of discrimination to white "friends" and acquaintances, some of them would challenge him. While they accepted that discrimination happened, they argued that his experiences were not discrimination at all, but a figment of his imagination. They had a million lawyerly games of sophistry to deny the validity of his experiences. He told me that not one of those "discrimination deniers" remained his "friends," and looking back, their reaction to hearing about his experiences was the red flag that gave an early indication of where their "friendship" was headed.

I am bringing this up, as I am reaching out to writers here and there, to see if they might be interested in my big essay and beginning a dialogue about it. And as I do so, I sadly realize that I am going to get a lot of "conspiracy theory" Level 3 denial of our experiences. It just comes with the territory of reaching out to the "smart," academics, and scientists. I have adopted the policy that when I receive those "conspiracy theory" challenges, my reply is that my work speaks for itself, and if they do their homework and come up with some good questions, then I might reply, but the ball was in their court to achieve some credibility, not mine. That usually ends the conversation. I have yet to encounter even one person who made the "conspiracy theory" comment regarding my work who ever came close to understanding the situation or made any rational critiques of my work. The good news is that I no longer waste my time with those people, and when they make their "conspiracy theory" challenge, I turn it right back on them and give them an opportunity to show me what they got. I am still waiting. That is one reason why I say that people need some kind of awakening experience in order to understand my work. Otherwise, their awareness is usually trapped by their conditioning, and they display the kinds of behaviors that led people such as Brian O to wonder if humanity was really a sentient species.

And it is not just people who are determined to defend their worldview against all evidence who do that, which is why I give them the benefit of the doubt and show me what they got. In the early stages of the Jewish Holocaust, a rare Jew escaped and made it back to his family and neighbors, and quite often, when he tried to tell them what was happening, all he received was denial. It was so far outside of their experience that nobody could believe it. They thought that the escapee had either lost his mind, was lying, imagining it, or greatly exaggerating the events. I have a Jewish friend whose relative had that exact experience, when those he fled to denied the validity of his experiences, and came up with rather elaborate theories to explain away what he experienced, while the Holocaust was happening.

So, that is another variation of what I receive when I relate our experiences. As I have stated, there were times in the aftermath of the Ventura nightmare when I thought that maybe I was insane, but I eventually realized that I was quite sane but living in an insane world. Just last night, I reread the final chapter of Paul Fussell's Wartime, titled, "The real war will never get in the books." That chapter's title came from Walt Whitman, after interviewing Civil War veterans, but Fussell's masterpiece was about World War II. Fussell said that one of the biggest frustrations of soldiers on the front lines was that the people at home did not know and did not want to know what really happened in war. I recently wrote about Tony Bennett, who heroically spoke out against the American invasion of Iraq. Bennett was in World War II and called warfare humanity's lowest state. But the folks at home got the Disney version and still do today. John Steinbeck was a war correspondent and later admitted that they were all cheerleaders, and Fussell wrote: "It is true, Steinbeck is aware, that most military operations are examples of 'disorganized insanity,' but the morale on the home front must not be jeopardized by an eyewitness saying so."

I grew up in the Vietnam War and saw innumerable TV shows and movies about World War II while growing up. I watched Fury in the past month, and hardly a year goes by without another movie about some aspect of World War II coming out. I often watch them, but I am not sure why I still do. Maybe it is so I can keep reminding myself when I hear all the chest-beating today about the "noble" work that the USA is performing in Afghanistan, Iraq, and vicinity.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Q: Wade, I have encountered challenges to evolution, and they seem persuasive. Is there any validity to them?

A: Not that I have seen. To the uninitiated, those kinds of arguments and evidence can seem persuasive, but if you really dig into them, the arguments and evidence fall apart. On the fringes are many invalid hypotheses, if we will be charitable and call them scientific hypotheses. The big difference between hypotheses and theories made by scientists and those fringe challenges is that the scientific hypotheses deal with the sum total of known evidence (the kind that can ideally be reproduced or has exceptional rigor (such as only one known fossil of a species, but has indisputable provenance)), and the hypotheses are subject to falsification, meaning that they can be proven false.

The challenges to evolution that I have seen usually came from Christians who wanted to make the Book of Genesis literally accurate, with the universe being made in six days, etc. No scientist ever approaches anything that way, trying to make a book right. The Book of Genesis has been falsified many times, if it was the basis for scientific hypotheses. The history of life on Earth, as a process of evolution, which in its essence is one of descent with modification, is the most battle-tested theory in the life sciences. There are no known exceptions (and I know of no cover-up in these areas, as far as fossil evidence goes), and scientists think, for good reason, that all life on Earth today is descended from a single organism that lived billions of years ago. That organism likely was a descendant of hundreds of millions of years of evolution, and evolution before LUCA may always be a matter of speculation, and how life began on Earth may be an eternal mystery. But life after LUCA has adhered to the idea of descent with modification, with no known exceptions.

Even if it turns out that ET civilizations have intervened with the evolutionary process on Earth (and maybe even seeded the first life here), and the human genome in particular (which I consider possible, but the "proofs" of it that fringe theorists have presented are highly speculative and not persuasive), it still will not invalidate the evolutionary process.

That does not mean that I am a materialist or that all scientists are, but materialism is the dominant paradigm. I do not subscribe to materialism myself, as I have seen it falsified, especially regarding materialistic theories of consciousness. There is far more happening than meets the eye. Enlightened scientists know that materialism is a faith, not a science, as it is based on unproven assumptions, and the best of them are keenly aware of the limits of scientific inquiry. All too often, scientists have become priests for materialism and equate it with science, and act is if it is the only path to knowledge. Carl Sagan was a notorious practitioner of that faith, called scientism today, and it is often practiced under the Orwellian rubric of "skepticism," when it is not really skeptical at all. As a group, "skeptics" are arguably the most dishonest and incompetent group that I have encountered, particularly for a group that supposedly represents the light of reason and honest inquiry. I do not want to pick on them too much, as most areas of professional thought are like this, such as the media, the history taught to children, medical science, and so on.

Because I was in the disruptive energy technology field, I discovered how the world really works the hard way, and I came to understand that today's science textbooks resemble cave drawings compared to what is known in the Black Projects world. So, as Bucky Fuller said, science is a slave profession, and is actually irrelevant to many big and important issues, but evolution is not one of them. Challenging evolution as a process is one of many instances in which people bark up the wrong tree, in their scientific illiteracy.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

More choir Q&A.

Q: Wade, Dennis Lee sure seems like a con man! How could you hook up with somebody like him? That relationship really detracts from your work's credibility.

A: Well, Dennis is a con man of sorts. The word "con man" is short for "confidence man." Dennis is the con man the same way that a salesman, preacher, the USA's president, TV news anchor, etc. are con men and women. They try to get people to "believe" in their message using the arts of persuasion. The difference between a con man as popularly conceived and Dennis was that con men then pulled off a criminal act of theft from their marks. But when I met Dennis, he was doing the opposite of what con men do, as he sold the world's best heating system under the program of putting it on people's homes for free, and they did not even have to believe that it worked. It is probably the most brilliant thing that I ever saw him do. Unfortunately, the real con men in that situation – the electric companies and their toadies – wiped out Dennis's company that I first worked for when I was with Dennis, and he was never able to resurrect a program like that, although I helped him try.

Ever since those days when I met Dennis, he tried to build programs on a lot of faith, and that is partly why I am not with him anymore. He appealed to people's indoctrinated ideologies, especially the big three – Christianity, American Nationalism, and capitalism – in building his programs. I eventually realized what they all have in common, do not believe in any of them myself, and realized that such an approach would not work for manifesting the biggest event in the human journey, which was what we were essentially pursuing, although we really did not realize it at the time.

I could go on for days about Dennis's approaches, his appeal to faith, and other aspects of what he does and who he is, but the fact is that I have never met or heard of another like him, and he always put his life where his mouth was. What we did not initially realize, nor did our fellow travelers that we met along the way, was that what we were pursuing on the technology front was accomplished long ago. It is a common understanding in our small circles, and is not based on rumor, but what we experienced. When I told my astronaut colleague what somebody close to me experienced, his reaction was almost a yawn, and he then asked me what else was new.

Of course, our adventures were rather ridiculous, and a voice in my head led me to Dennis, but it was not the first time that I asked that voice for guidance, and I do not want to hear from it anymore. My fellow travelers, who were mainly scientists by training, all had similar mystical awakenings and otherworldly guidance. It just comes with the territory, and events that seem preposterous to the masses were our regular companions. You do not get to understand how the world really works by punching corporate America's clock, sitting in a cubicle, watching TV, or surfing the Internet, but by experience of chasing big events, such as free energy. Then you get to trip the light fantastic and find out how the world really works. It is nothing like what our indoctrination depicts.

Dennis has a Christian approach to life, as do tens of millions of Americans, and that is actually unusual among my fellow travelers, as we generally took a more mystical approach, but Dennis had a voice in his head, too, which led him on his journey. Dennis calls his voice "God," in the Christian style, while I have no idea who my voice was. I can understand why many are turned off by Dennis's overt Christianity and con man style, but I was with him in spite of those qualities, not because of them, but I had to admit that nobody could stir up action like Dennis could. I never met another entrepreneur like him.

Regarding my own work and its credibility, it speaks for itself. When I have had the credibility of my work assailed, it always essentially came down to the assailants admitting that they were not there to witness it, and they prefer to deny the validity of our experiences because they never saw that view from their cubicles or on TV, at least in non-fiction programs. Of course, the reporting of our experiences, although heavily documented, is only a small portion of my site. Most of it deals with information that is easily verified, particularly the iconoclastic information, and I have yet to see one such critic of my work make an honest, rational, and informed effort. So, I am far more "skeptical" of my critics than they are of my work, and my association with Dennis is what it is. You do not see me spout Christian, American, or capitalist ideology in my work. In fact, I poke holes through them regularly. Literalist interpretations of the Bible are way off base, IMO, and American ideology (and all imperialist ideology) is based on fairy tales and lies of omission, as is capitalist ideology.

Could Dennis's initial free energy idea work? Probably not, although variations of it might, and some pretty high-powered scientists thought it could work. For me, however, the theoretical arguments become meaningless compared to the working technologies that those close to me witnessed. All the theory in the world pales next to that, no matter if orthodox theory pronounced such technologies "impossible." The history of science is filled with such "impossible" pronouncements, and the scientists making such statements regularly later had to wipe the egg off their faces. I have encountered numerous such "impossible" technologies in my journey, and many are easily verified, but they are pointedly ignored or suppressed by the mainstream, sometimes violently, but are usually just frozen out and treated like they don't exist. People probably have to witness some of that before they begin to understand.

When people try to discredit my work by citing my association with Dennis, or Brian O'Leary, or Noam Chomsky, I found that they were always using it to try to distract from my work and get it caught up in issues that were little more than gossip. The world's leading authorities have lauded the parts of my work where they had expertise (1, 2), so I know its merit, and my assailants were always irrational, dishonest, or never did their homework, and some assailants may have been professionals.

I have to hide some identities in my writings, to protect the guilty and the innocent (which any writer like me faces), but most of those names are easily discovered with a modicum of effort. So, those kinds of "unsupportable" criticisms again fall flat. I may reveal more identities after more people die, but that may not happened for many years. If anybody really begins digging into such issues, my tale becomes far more credible, not less.

My association with Dennis is perhaps my life's greatest honor, and I wear that badge proudly, and if people want to discredit my work because of my association with Dennis, they have some strenuous work ahead of them to establish their own credibility.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

This has been written about here before, but it was just on Yahoo!'s front page, on Detroit's swift decline. Incredible. If there is a silver lining there, it is that the ruins are being razed to the ground.

Best,

Wade

[Limor Wolf]

Posted by Wade Frazier (here)
Hi:

And it is not just people who are determined to defend their worldview against all evidence who do that, which is why I give them the benefit of the doubt and show me what they got. In the early stages of the Jewish Holocaust, a rare Jew escaped and made it back to his family and neighbors, and quite often, when he tried to tell them what was happening, all he received was denial. It was so far outside of their experience that nobody could believe it. They thought that the escapee had either lost his mind, was lying, imagining it, or greatly exaggerating the events. I have a Jewish friend whose relative had that exact experience, when those he fled to denied the validity of his experiences, and came up with rather elaborate theories to explain away what he experienced, while the Holocaust was happening.

Hello Wade,

These are almost insurmountable challenges to one's psych and it streches the soul to the limit. When it comes to Jewish Holocaust survivors they could be divided to two (Unequal parts). Those who were able to talk about it and did so possibly as a therapeutic method and with a sense of mission over and over again for many years, and those who kept silent (the majority), defeated by the inflicted trauma.

The isolation of an 'informed' individual is a conditioning that is contingent on the psych of those around him, when the ability to expand the boundaries of their own experience is almost nonexistent

The other thing is that they don't want to hear, subconciously knowing that some kind of difficulty or breakdown in perception is almost guaranteed which will effect their world, and the known and familiar (even if devil) is considered- safety.

When someone with such experiences happened to be on that side of the table, they are almost always bound to lend their ear even if what is told to them is not in the sphere of their events

And you may very well fall into this category, and this may probably be why you say that people need some kind of awakening experience in order to understand your work

It is an honor to be able to read it and hear your story, Thank you ~

Limor

[sdv]

Dear Wade

I was putting off reading your essay until I was settled at Nuama (that's a long story and I hope to share that journey on this forum) but I decided today that there is no better to start than now, so I have started the big read of the big essay...!

Please would you add links to your essay and your websites at the bottom of every post. I think this would facilitate greater access to your work. To do this, you need to go into settings for your profile and add the relevant links. We have a great team of moderators and admin folk on this forum so I am sure they will help you to do so.

Thank you so very much for the work you do and for the path you walk in life. So far, I am enjoying reading your big essay and hope that it will facilitate the opening of many doors in my mind so that I can have access to more information and experiences in this lifetime!

[Wade Frazier]

testing, testing...

[Limor Wolf]

Originally posted by Wade Frazier: " Even if it turns out that ET civilizations have intervened with the evolutionary process on Earth (and maybe even seeded the first life here), and the human genome in particular (which I consider possible, but the "proofs" of it that fringe theorists have presented are highly speculative and not persuasive), it still will not invalidate the evolutionary process."

I happened to think about it in relations to your massive work, Wade. It takes courage to even contemplate this after such an enormouse investment, or just sheer plain integrity. True, perheps if Et's have seeded the first human prototype on earth then the evolutionary process itself is still 'man-made', but what if cataclysmic events (not the extinction of the mega-fauna which is without doubt human 'achievment', but a bolide event and simliar) were ET made, and the fourth epochal event - The industrial revolution has all the hallmarks of ET intervention for those who can read the signs, and the Armament race is almost proven with that, for those who can hear the stories and extract the evidence. Humans may have been left to develop on their own for quite a while, but the last thousands of years directive towards either Fifth Epocal event or Sixth Mass Extinction has ET imprints all over it, and there might be players that thrive for each way. By all accounts, Free Energy is a good option in the earth petri-dish.

And Love is always the answer ~

Limor

P.s

Great suggestion from Sdv about the link in the signature. Testing seems successful

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Limor:

Your Holocaust survivor "camps" are very much like soldier camps, for those who saw combat. Those who really saw combat rarely sat around the campfire telling war stories. Those who survived the experience almost never talked about it and tried to forget it, and almost nobody in their lives wanted to hear it, anyway. The rare Eugene Sledge wrote about it, usually as a form of self-therapy. I once met a man with the tattoo of his concentration camp number on his arm, and I doubt that there was any way that he would discuss the experience, but he seemed truly happy to be alive (this is nearly 40 years ago).

Being an American, I have known many former soldiers, and those who saw combat never talked about it, and a recent experience was a friend who never admitted that he even saw combat (in Vietnam) for the first 30 years or so that I knew him, and he still did not want to discuss it, but I heard about it through a mutual friend. My first psychologist specialized in treating soldiers, I was a great candidate for this therapy, and it helped. Yes, other than Dennis, I am the only person who will publicly write about our adventures. Almost everybody else is dead, licking their wounds, hiding out, laying low, and so on. I do not do it out of sense of therapy (I did in the early days, but not really any longer) so much as a teaching device, for those who can understand it, and yes, that is partly why I say that people probably need some kind of awakening experience before they can begin to shed their indoctrination and begin to understand. Those who got their awakening experiences because they followed their hearts, such as Ralph McGehee, get the most valuable ones. Dennis, Brian, I, and my few relatively fellow travelers usually had similar kinds of awakening experiences. Often enough, we nearly did not survive them.

OK, anecdote time. This one will be relevant to recent writings of mine, and I will reveal another couple of names, as I also did in the past few days. I posted up "Mr. Financier's" account of what happened in Seattle, and anybody who gets Dennis's The Alternative knows that Mr. Financier's real name was John Spickard, and his company's name was Selectors. I am revealing their names because John is almost certainly dead (he looked to be in his 70s when I met him in 1986 – I just looked him up, and he would be 99 if he was still alive, which I doubt) and Selectors is out of business, as far as I can tell (but they will likely always be anonymous on my site). It was probably gutted by the thieves that stole it and did not last long. Again, this will be another little vignette of literally hundreds that I could write about my days with Dennis, and some background is in order.

When Dennis's business deals began being scuttled in Seattle, and a bank official told Dennis that somebody was actively screwing him from behind the scenes, Dennis did not have any idea yet that it was the electric companies. Dennis then decided that he needed to look outside the Seattle area for a company to finance his effort, and in a rare instance, John saw the genius of what Dennis was doing. John was an Old School entrepreneur who built his finance company from scratch, playing against the Big Boys in Spokane, and you had to be wily and resourceful to survive in that shark tank. Like the Chairman of the Board of that Fortune 500 company, John understood the business play that Dennis was making and was enthralled by it. Like that chairman, John had little, if any, of the humanitarian motivation that Dennis did, but saw a play that could be worth billions, and wanted to get in on the ground floor. But John played the game honestly, and why I am even bringing this situation up is that Dennis said that John did what I did when I raised the money to be his partner, in that John gave shares of his company to friends and family members, so they could all share in his prosperity. Their betrayals were partly why John had his company stolen from him a couple of weeks before Dennis had his company stolen, and this situation will take a little telling.

Not only did Dennis believe the full-page ads that the electric companies ran in the wake of the Whoops disaster and think that they would throw him a tickertape parade, he also had no idea that the Mormon Church was one of the biggest investors in Washington's electric companies. When I saw Steven Greer write, a generation later, that the Mormon financial empire was one of the Godzilla's biggest members, it made perfect sense to me, as Mormons were triggermen in taking us out in Seattle and Ventura, after they infiltrated our operations, and the Mormon connection with Dennis's Seattle takedown began with John's company. When Dennis joined the Patriot Movement several years later, the Mormon Church reportedly threatened to ex-communicate any Church members who joined Dennis's effort. A Mormon-owned newspaper then libeled Dennis, which Mr. Skeptic used in his libelous work.

As soon as John became involved, he wanted a piece of Dennis's company, and he encouraged Dennis to buy a shell company to quickly take his company public, so that John's company could get a nice chunk of it (10%). A youngster working at John's company, a Mormon, introduced Dennis to a company that had a shell for sale. Those people with the shell stole John's and Dennis's companies. How much they were part of the larger effort to wipe Dennis out in Seattle may always be an open question for me, but I think that Dennis believes they were related. As you can see in John's statement, he believed that the theft of his and Dennis's companies were related, as the same people stole both companies, assisted on the inside by John's and Dennis's trusted people, my boss in Dennis's instance, and some of the very people who John gave stock in his company to in the other.

Again, many lives were ruined by the snuff job that the electric companies inflicted on Dennis's effort, and his employee's violent death, courtesy of Bill the BPA Hit Man, was Dennis's first radicalizing moment in his energy adventures, but far from his last. When the hammer came down repeatedly on the company, it began to look like they would not get those systems installed by the end of 1985, when the tax credit expired, and John's company would have been wrecked. John then had his moment of truth with Dennis, in late 1985, when Dennis demanded $1 million, per the terms of his contract with John's company, to get those systems built and installed by year-end. When John balked, Dennis told John to his face that he would have been legally entitled to use that $1 million to buy back his stock at a deep discount and leave town with that $1 million, and John could carry his bags to the plane. John paid it, and Dennis used it all to get those systems built and installed, and Dennis proved his integrity under fire once again, and that kind of behavior was behind John writing that statement several years later. We knew who Dennis was: he proved it to us.

That kid at John's company came to work for us in Seattle (I just looked the kid up – he is about my age – and he works in the electric industry today; coincidence? ), and his dad worked at the company that sold Dennis the shell. When they made the play to steal Dennis's company, the kid finally saw the blood of what the family "business" caused people to shed, and it messed him up pretty good, seeing the first "hit" that he participated in.

I do not want to get too far into the mechanics of the theft of Dennis's company in Seattle, but what the owners of the shell company did was steal back the company they sold Dennis, as they said that they had not properly ratified the shell deal with Dennis's company, so his 85% ownership of his company was void and only the validly issued stock was voting stock, and Selectors's 10% became 65% of the "outstanding" stock, and John attended the shareholders' meeting, where the stock that his company had, now stolen from him, was voted by the thieves of his company to also steal Dennis's company. In theory, if they did not give Dennis any ownership of the stock, then Dennis could rescind the entire deal and now own his private company. But that was not how it worked out, and John and Dennis both witnessed the theft of his company via the theft of John's, and the employees cheered as the theft was complete. It was my first awakening moment in my ride with Dennis.

For those of you who are not business people, here is an analogy that might make sense. Suppose that you had your life's savings in hand, and decided to open a new account at a bank that recruited you to deposit your money with them. You went to the bank, filled out the paperwork, and then shook hands with the bank president as he took your money. Sometime later, you went to make a withdrawal, and the bank president said that there was a document that he did not sign, that made your bank account invalid. So, you then asked for your money back, and the bank president said that since he did not fill out that form, that your deposit was now owned by the bank. Your life's savings, gone like that, and the banker then told you to have a nice day as security ushered you out onto the sidewalk. That is essentially what happened to Dennis in Seattle, after his company had already been wrecked by the electric companies and their minions. Anybody with a modicum of horse sense would say, "Hey, they can't do that!" I wish I had a dollar for every time that I saw one of Dennis's lawyers say that when the judges made rulings that essentially said that what that bank did was legal. When Dennis's lawyers exclaimed in shock, "They can't do that!", the judge replied with a grin," Watch this!" Mr. Big Time Attorney nearly got disbarred when he filed a lawsuit in federal court against the Ventura County officials for activities that made what happened in Seattle resemble a child's prank. Even though Mr. Big Time Attorney had defeated the IRS in the USA's Supreme Court the year before he took Dennis's case, he got a rude awakening in California as he was treated like something unpleasant the judges stepped on an unceremoniously wiped from the soles of their shoes.

I could go on and on about that theft of Dennis's company in Seattle, but I will cut it short and just note that when that old girlfriend repeatedly attacked me, and she was about my smallest shareholder, Dennis told me to get rid of her, fast. Pay her twice what she invested and be done with her, as she would later be a weak link that would be used by the unscrupulous to take us down. Little did I know that my old girlfriend's attacks were only a gentle preview of my next couple of years. You could not have convinced me what I was in for.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Limor:

ETs and me would be a long story. I touch on it in my essay, and leave many of the dots unconnected because I do not know, and could not provide much solid evidence anyway. There is a blizzard of disinformation out there, not too dissimilar from the three-ring-circus around FE, and those circuses are related. I take most ET tales with a grain of salt. Until they come into the open, if they ever come into the open, it will all be just a bunch of speculation and fairy tales. I try to keep my writings close to my personal experiences and those of my close inner circles and evidence that people can check out for themselves. The rest of it I leave alone. A lot may be legit, but a lot of it is certainly disinformation purveyed by various parties for various reasons. I am guided by my spiritual understandings in these matters, and almost do not care what the ETs may be up to. It is up to us to learn to paddle our own canoe, such is the developmental path of sentient species.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Before signing off for the evening, I want to make a post on all of those "outside" influences that people obsess over, whether they are "good" or "bad." I once knew an ET contactee who was "abducted" nearly every night for years. They were the standard "grays," and each abduction overwhelmed him with fear, and as he also did spiritual work over the years (he claimed "walk in" status and channeled various entities, etc., and I had a reading from him once), he eventually began to get his arms around what may have been happening with the "abductions," and then one day, instead of the fear of anticipation that he had, and the fear he had during the abductions, he looked forward to that night's "abduction" with what almost could be called pleasure, and they never came again.

I have written about the dozens and dozens of channeling sessions I have attended, readings I have had, and the like (around 100 in total, I would imagine). When I had dozens of sessions with Seth over the years, in the late 1980s, perhaps the most important message that I got from Seth was his first (as I was literally on my way to Dennis in Boston), when he said to meet him as an equal (as I met one of my "heroes" from my early adulthood), and to not put him on some kind of pedestal. In my FE writings, I have often stated that approaching the "rich and powerful" was always a prescription for failure. What virtually everybody does in these and related fields is look to the ETs, Godzilla, the Ascended Masters, the Black Hats, the White Hats, the governments, the corporations, the "philanthropists," etc., etc., as either the source of our ruin or salvation. Looking to any of them for any of that is playing the victim. We are here to learn how to be creators, and creators create with love. Looking to any outside agency for our salvation, or blaming any of them for our ruin, is what victims do, and when we do that, we are not hitting the notes. I am about hitting the notes, as I see it as the only way out of our self-created mess.

The story of the journey of life on Earth as pieced together by our scientists is fascinating, and I share their sense of wonder, and it is time to begin to behave like the sentient species that we allegedly are. Only then will we turn the corner as a species. Otherwise, it may be game over. The "Space Brothers" are not going to save us, and the grays are not going to enslave us, no matter how appearances might seem. If 0.0001% of us collectively wake up, all those games of manipulation, opportunity for dark games, "saving" us, and the like will end, and we will begin to walk a creator's path, not a victim's. That is what we are here to learn, and the path to it has to be consistent with the goal, and that means that it has be an effort grounded in love and enlightenment. That is the name of my game, and I have my good days and bad days, too, as nobody here gets off easy.

Good night,

Wade

[Nine]

Wade,

I am only an observer.

I see things through feelings and that triggers memories and then I can somehow try to comprehend my world.

Your gift is your ability to remember upon command. It is a wonderful gift and I say this not out of any sense of jealousy but of gratitude that you might share it. Well, you gave your work away and so none of the American rackets can take over what you have written and I suppose that in the end this will be an achievement....

And of course in a few moments I will forget what I wrote...

Of course evolution would say that its only a set of chemical reactions but of course any feeling person would say that its simply more complicated than that and maybe you are our own Australopithecus?

Did I get the right scientific term?...

And of course your posts are not to brag up your knowledge but to connect dots for folks who are scientifically literate who will read these things and the dots that you connect and who weather in government or in powerful private enterprises will read these things and they will be in a position to make a positive change....

I would suspect to experts these things that you write about in your grand essay are grand overviews or the big picture that many fine scientists have lost due to their training or other factors....

Would I be so off base to suggest that uncle Noam's grand work "The Manufacturing of Consent" might have been his life time grand work?

I highly recommend uncle Noam's vid and its all over youtube....

I watched a video on youtube of uncle Noam speaking a few months after 9/11 and his take on cui bono....that analysis still stands IMO to this day....

Who benefited ...but the usual suspects....


Nine

[Nine]

Wade,

Post 4467...

FUBAR...

****ed up beyond all repair

came from WW2

Would describe my three decades with the feds...

Bennet was a vet of the battle of the bulge as was my father....

The rallying cry?

To Berlin and to the end of the war....

They lied...what a surprise...unless you were the one fighting...

As my mom told me Dad talked about how they sat upon a hill for three days and watched as the Russian army advanced knowing that they were first and that their army was unstoppable yet was stopped...

I watched how he lived with that one Wade...

Only to find out later that this was how the cold war got started...dad had a first hand seat to history knowing in the end that its all lies and BS...

Many in the alternative media say that Putin and Russia are humanities savior and of course if Dad were alive he would call this a bunch of poppy cock and as Fuller said there is no political solution to this mess....

Mom turns 100 in April and I have a picture of Dad upon his tank in that Seventh Armored
division which made history in WW2 and mom called him a sexy devil....

Its all theater Wade...all of it....I mean the wars...

thanx

Nine

[Nine]

Wade,

I have a question and am as a former evangelical much afraid and shammed to ask...

But a very dear loved one whom is still trapped in the above asks about feelings about being a lesbien....

I looked it up upon Wade's golden internet as some sort of gift and found this...

"Gay can mean lesbian, but lesbian cannot always mean gay.
Female/Female= gay or lesbian, by terminology
Male/Male= gay only

guys, we should come up with our own special word equivalent to lesbian."

I only have more questions with such comments upon the net...

I would think that the term is choice....

I told my fundemental wife that I love her forever and always but the truth is?

So as it would seem lesbian's have an advantage in the game....

How does one homeschool his kids upon the most fundimental christian principals and have one end up in jail and the other a lesbien....

and I consouled my pal....but its all a lie...all of it ...maybe...what those evangelicals preach...

god forbid

they infest our military and many ...other organs of power...

When put in such terms things through the fog look a bit ...

less foggy....


Nine