WADE FRAZIER : A Healed Planet

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Robin, I just ordered The Most Dangerous Superstition. Thanks. Anarchism is a big subject. Chomsky is a form of anarchist, and has written quite a bit on what anarchism means. He defines it as a challenge to illegitimate authority. Chomsky acknowledges that there are legitimate forms of authority, mostly to ensure safety, peace, and to prevent and police crime. Almost all other forms of authority on Earth today are not legitimate. I have been in peace marches and encountered the Black Bloc, and they are a bunch of teenagers with too many hormones coursing through their veins and hoodlums looking for an opportunity to be "chaotic" for those who are not literally working on behalf of the police to create some full employment for police and justify repression. Anybody remember COINTELPRO? A lot of Black Bloc "anarchism" is just COINTELPRO updated for the 21st century. As you note, they are what most people think of when they think of anarchists, just like most Americans think of PETA when they think of vegetarians, and about 99% of vegetarians are not happy with PETA's juvenile antics.

One of the biggest Level 5 fears is anarchy and people irresponsibly using FE, and I favor a global peacekeeping group staffed with grandmothers during the transition, and I see almost all government in the transition and afterward being primarily concerned with safety, harmlessness, and ensuring that every gets the fruits of abundance. That kind of government I would be happy to see. I think that there will always be some form of government, but it will be along those lines. For instance, there is some kind of "government" in this world.

The last half of my big essay is the doozy, with the first half just a warmup. Good luck with it.

People have been making esoteric interpretations of Tolkien's work for many years, and the spectrum goes from "conspiratorial," as you suggest, to more unconscious remembrance of more "magical" times. I have read a lot of Tolkien analysis over the years.

On alternative and "conspiratorial" history, I am careful to not get too speculative, and there is a great deal of it out there, at varying levels of validity. Some is no doubt "real," but the evidence is usually thin and often interpreted in a fanciful manner. I give a nod to conspiratorial goings on (How can I not, with my journey? ), and even speculate a little on when they may have become more global in nature (when Europe began conquering the world). Good luck with the writing.

Hi Nine:

It is all good, and you get a gold star for being the first member of the "public" to acknowledge reading my big essay. Your rambling style and topics have made some Avalonian radars go up. Some of us are very experienced with disinformation agents and professional trolls, so you might say that some of us are quite sensitive to anything that seems a little "off," but your "retardation" could explain it. But you can keep on writing, for my part. Maybe you could organize them a little more (make one post instead of three, for instance), is all that I can say. You have put the "smart" to shame, as you have been doing the reading.

When I lived in LA, I lived a couple of blocks from the beginning of the South Bay boardwalk that began in Redondo Beach and ran to Manhattan Beach. I am sure that it is a four-lane freeway today. Back then, it was only a normal sidewalk, the kind you find on any street, with no "lanes." I understand the allure of somebody bagging their career to "surf" the boardwalks (the West Coast, Hawaii, and Alaska are full of "dropouts"), but I'll take this any day.

I was just reading my January 2015 Z Magazine issue last night, and Uncle Ed has something in every issue. Damn, he is going to be 90 this spring! What an inspiration, like Uncle Howard and Uncle Noam. In this issue, Ed reviews a book on the international kangaroo courts that the USA has been setting up, to target its victims with "justice." It makes the kangaroo courts that I lived through with Dennis pale in comparison. Ed and I have been writing about those kangaroo courts for many years, and supported by "human rights" organizations, of all things. We both agreed on how Human Rights Watch was a complete sellout, and we agreed on the sad decline of Amnesty International, but I took it to them more than Ed will publicly do. Just yesterday, I was reading a blog that stated that today, the global understanding is that the USA is an evil empire, and even Americans are beginning to wake up, and the rest of the world looks forward to the USA's imperial fall and hopes that the damage it inflicts as it declines will be minimal. We are going the way of Rome, and fast.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

OK, time to weigh in on the oil situation, and there is a lot to write, but I will try to keep it short. Oil is the most valuable fuel on Earth (other than ZPE ), and the imperial powers have been ensconced in the Middle East for a century, and all geopolitical strife in that part of the world is all about hydrocarbons, and everything else is noise.

The hydrocarbon deposits that have powered the Industrial Revolution were all accumulated initially by photosynthesis (where the "synthesis" comes from), and for oil in particular, geological processes "distilled" anoxic marine sediments into the oil that we burn with such abandon today. There has not been a significant anoxic event to make oil in 90 million years. No more oil will be made anytime soon, and 75% of Earth's coal was formed in a brief window of time when the first trees formed those coal beds that we mine with abandon, before fungi learned to digest lignin. Very little coal has been "made" in the past 300 million years. At current rates of consumption, all the conventional oil and gas will be used up in this century, and even coal use will have peaked. Basically, humanity is burning up those hydrocarbons a million times as fast as they were created. That is the biggest story on Earth today, and everything else is noise. A scientifically illiterate public is oblivious to all that, and many deny that burning up those hydrocarbons will have any atmospheric effects, in their blinkered foolishness.

Although neoclassical economics ignores physical reality in favor of social theories, price and supply and demand is a legitimate feature of our economies as currently constructed. If FE makes its appearance, money and markets will become obsolete, but until then, prices and money have their effects, although there is one hell of a lot of game-rigging happening.

In my Savings and Loan Scandal essay, I predicted something like the Enron and related scandals happening, predicted the real estate collapse, and last spring I predicted the coming crises. The next round is nearly here. I could see something coming not because I am psychic, but because what was happening was so obvious to those not oblivious or those who drank too much Kool-Aid in their greed. Endlessly printing money always ends badly, and the "malinvestment" might have a different bottomless well to dump the money into each time, but the eventual outcome is guaranteed, and TPTB cannot all be that stupid, and even establishment stalwarts like Bill Black can easily discern the criminal and "conspiratorial" nature of the scams, with the highest councils on Earth in on it. I have my doubts that Godzilla is involved, but it is likely a lower-level of the game that "masterminds" these activities. The bottom line is that the world is quickly running out of hydrocarbon energy, and all the money printing and other interventions are essentially designed to steal from the middle class and poor on behalf of the rich. It is the same evil game that has been played since the beginning of civilization, just more sophisticated than ever. It is all just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic, and Godzilla sees how it might turn out, hence his Mars contingency plans.

I have been saying for years that the Shale Oil "boom" in the USA will end badly, and it is as I write this, but not quite like I had anticipated, just as I did not quite anticipate how the other collapses/scandals happened. The exact mechanism of collapse is slightly different each time, but today's impending collapse is actually just like the others, in that those easy money policies always sought the marginal borrowers to get those initially high returns, and the "smart" ones were long gone with their up-front fees and took their gains riding it all up and got out before it all came crashing down. So, in that respect, this is just like the previous four that I have witnessed in my lifetime. So, here it comes. Will people finally begin to wake up? I am not counting on it, but bankers just might be lynched this time, with the third bubble collapse in 15 years.

So, going after marginal sources of hydrocarbons (Shale Oil and Tar Sands are not really "oil" in the conventional sense, but the dregs of Earth's hydrocarbons) and the resultant "malinvestment" looks like it will trigger this new collapse, as the supply and demand curves crossed and oil prices plunged. They will likely not stay low for that long, but long enough to wreak havoc on the world's financial system. Hang on to your hats!

Best,

Wade

[Joe Akulis]

I wonder how much of the United States' involvement in the Middle East since Bretton Woods was related to forcing those countries to continue to trade in US "petrodollars"?

It couldn't have taken some of those nations very long to realize that we were simply offshoring to them the inflationary effects that any country would normally experience by constantly running current accounts deficits like we always have. No one else could pull it off without internal inflationary havoc, because no one else could force their currency to be held in reserve like we have been doing.

I think I read somewhere that the "Special Drawing Right" was originally conceived as a way for Middle Eastern nations to get back to trading in a more stable currency. I wonder what creative operations the US came up with to make sure that didn't happen...

That's another part of the cookie that has been crumbling today, however. The ability of the US to dump the pain of inflation onto everyone else they trade with has dwindled rapidly.

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Seeker:

Yes, indeed, being the world's primary reserve currency provides many perks, and dumping our economic problems on others is one of them, kind of like how the USA has dumped its waste onto the world's poor nations. I will be surprised if the USA does not lose its reserve status in my lifetime. Of course, I seek to make money extinct.

The bankers have played many dirty games with petrodollars, such as shifting those third-world-debt problems onto the Arab nations (basically, those 1970s petrodollars were "invested" in third-world debt, or at least the banks made sure that a disproportionate share of the losses went to the Arabs). There is no love between those parties, that is for sure. We could easily see a Chinese or Asian Union currency become the new world's reserve currency in my lifetime, if World War III over the dwindling oil supplies does not intervene.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Quickly, before I go hiking, when Bush and company were beating the war drums for invading Iraq, one reason proffered by analysts not in the establishment's hip pocket was that part of the reason was that Iraq stopped using the dollar for its oil transactions, especially after American banks froze Iraq's funds, similar to what they are doing to Russia today. It is just another aspect of warfare. So, Seeker, yes, going off the dollar standard is a great way to attract attention from the USA's "intelligence" and military cartels. This kind of genocidal bullying is something that the USA has long excelled at. As Uncle Noam has written, what the USA did to Vietnam was like what a Mafia enforcer does to the shopkeeper who refused to pay for "protection." The cost of punishing that shopkeeper (like killing him, and permanently wrecking that revenue stream) is more than made up by terrorizing the other shopkeepers, so that nobody else gets any ideas like that.

The USA's activities in the Middle East can certainly be seen in the same light, and going off the dollar standard is one way to "provoke" us.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Just one little post, before I am out the door…

I have written about it plenty before: all battle plans seem good, until the first shot is fired. Anybody who wants a detailed, step-by-step plan for manifesting FE before they budge has obviously never even tried to make anything important happen. There is no map where we are going. I have some pretty good ideas of what the destination can look like, or at least the next mountaintop where we can look backward and see where we came from, but what is by far the most important is finding those willing and able to embark on the journey, and that is partly what my "choir" idea is all about. Today, almost nobody is willing or able to even imagine where we can go, and most do not even care where we have been or how we got here. I am not trying to wake them up with my work. Only FE delivered into their lives can do that. The masses will not be awakened by talk. The social circle approach will not work.

That stated, there are plenty of transition ideas that can be batted around, just so long as nobody gets stuck on them as some kind of dogma. The goal will be harmlessness to all, and that may be the only "dogma" that I can embrace. As I have written, there have been steps in the right direction that have come from high tech, such as open-sourcing. Capitalism and exchange professions will not disappear overnight. But it will not take much intelligence or vision to quickly see that they would be on their way out with FE. A way that it could definitely go is that many of the first applications of FE will be to provide free water and food to all people. Markets will no longer dictate who has their basic creature needs met. Of course, Godzilla will resist all the way if he could, but truly, if a choir and those they draw was amassed, it would be game over for Godzilla, and he knows it. That kind of heart-centered sentience has never been amassed on Earth before, and nothing like FE could empower humanity more.

So, the very basics would be met for all of humanity, very quickly. People like me will have long showed where it could quickly go, so those ideas will become pretty common, but maybe the "market" system, such as it is, will continue for some time, for the non-necessities. Maybe there will still be some "luxury" goods for a while, but very quickly, the list of what was provided freely to all people would begin growing, and market systems would no longer control them. I can easily see food, water, shelter, clothing, transportation, communication, and real education being considered universal human rights. Heck, all nations on Earth, besides the USA, declared most of that long ago.

So, what is considered to be a human right will keep expanding, and the "luxuries" and those that need greed to inspire people to produce will shrink. Eventually, capitalists will wave the white flag, but it will not be in defeat, but for victory for all. Then the common good will truly be everybody's concern, and egocentrism in a world of scarcity will go the way of slavery. Of course, I have no objection for it to leap an octave or two to getting there almost overnight, but it could also become a slower affair. Again, as long as FE was not weaponized or used to further wreck Earth's ecosystems, it can be a fairly leisurely journey.

OK, now for that hike.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

A little post this morning on causes and effects, roots and branches. It is pretty much the point of my work, and very few people have understood or even seem the want to understand, but that understanding is the very root of what I am doing, and my big essay is intended to make it very clear.

• The Sun makes it all happen on Earth. Even chemosynthetic organisms are taking advantage of the energy imbalance created by the Sun's energy hitting Earth. Photosynthesis, the only other currently accepted path of energy into Earth's ecosystems, absorbs the Sun's energy directly.
• Life engaged in many innovations that allowed for greater energy captured, made energetic processes more efficient, or reduced energy losses. Without those energy innovations, not only would life as we know it not exist, but the more complex forms of life, called plants and animals, would have never appeared on Earth.
• In the eon of complex life that began nearly 600 million years ago, species and ecosystems rose and fell, with speciation, radiation, and extinction. Mass extinctions were radical events that "cleaned the slate" of the ecosystems and allowed for dramatically different species to dominate after the extinction, which were generally marginal species before the mass extinction event.
• Mammals were marginal species until the bolide event that wiped out dinosaurs. Mammals quickly came to dominate in the aftermath, and are still dominant today.
• An order of mammals called primates evolved in trees to take advantage of the greatest symbiosis of plants and animals ever, which was the appearance of the flowering plant. Primates made their homes in tropical canopies for tens of millions of years.
• Monkeys appeared and dominated primates, and some marginal monkeys left the canopy for the ground and became apes, and some marginal apes left the rainforest and became humans.
• The path to today's civilization was defined by energy innovations that humans introduced, and the first two were making stone tools and controlling fire, with fire being by far the most momentous innovation. To this day, the energy of controlled fire is primarily what powers human civilizations.
• Those energy innovations fueled the growing brain of the human line. Without those innovations, humans would not have appeared on the evolutionary scene. In very real ways, our tools made us.
• Less than 100,000 year ago, behaviorally modern humans appeared on the evolutionary scene, and their sophisticated toolset, combined with their mastery of language, allowed them to quickly conquer Earth and dominate all terrestrial ecosystems. That expansion meant the extinction of all of Earth's easy meat, and all other human species were also driven to extinction.
• When all the easy meat was gone and humans began feeling population pressure once again, after the Golden Age of the Hunter-Gatherer ended, in a few places on Earth, humans learned to domesticate plants and animals. Those energy innovations not only allowed humans to become permanently sedentary for the first time, but they also allowed humanity's numbers to greatly expand. The super-predator revolution allowed for a thousand-fold increase in Homo sapiens, and domestication allowed for another 200-fold increase, and industrialization has allowed for another increase of nearly an order of magnitude.
• The toolset and weaponry that allowed humans to conquer Earth also began to be used on each other early on, particularly when population pressures mounted. The first religions appear to have been a response to warfare, to create group cohesion to survive the wars with their neighbors. All warfare has always been primarily economic in nature.
• Domestication led to civilization, and all early civilizations had similar features, and they were all environmentally unsustainable, as they destroyed the forests and soils and altered the hydrological cycle, and droughts often were the death knell for those civilizations. As scientific investigation of collapsed civilizations has progressed since the 19th century, a generalized dynamic can be attributed to all civilization collapses: they ran out of energy, whether it was wood or food, and running out of food always marked the moment of collapse.
• The Golden Ages in the journey of life on Earth, including humanity's Golden Ages, only lasted as long as the easy energy did. Then it became a struggle for energy that eventually resulted in a collapse of ecosystems or civilizations.
• Human ideological systems always assumed energy scarcity, although few adherents really saw it that way, as the assumptions of all ideologies become invisible to their adherents, and even extends to today's scientific ideologies.
• The Industrial Revolution happened because humans on a deforested island turned to coal, and the energy of fossil fuels has powered the greatest era of prosperity that humanity has known.
• History's richest and most powerful nation was built by stealing Earth's richest continent from its inhabitants, who had not exploited the energy riches as Europe was doing, and in the midst of that conquest, liquid hydrocarbons began their exploitation, and the Industrial Revolution reached another level. Because the remnants of the shorelines of an ancient ocean lie beneath the Middle East, where nearly all of the remaining easy oil is, it is where Europe has focused its geopolitical meddling for the past century, and as I write this, history's greatest killing machine occupies the region. It is all about the oil, and everything else is just noise.
• That richest nation began to run out of oil beginning in 1970, it had its first energy crisis a few years later, and its standard of living has declined ever since.
• Because about 99% of humanity is scientifically illiterate, those very evident dynamics are invisible to them, and many of them think that there will be political and social solutions to humanity's predicament, which is entirely rooted in the energy issue. As one of the first great comprehensive thinkers on Earth stated, there are no political solutions to the problem.
• All attempts to wrestle control of the political and economic system from the elites who control them are like fighting over who has the best berths on the Titanic, but that is where nearly all political and social activism is focused. As Thoreau said, it is hacking at branches.
• I became involved in the energy issue because of that energy crisis in history's richest nation, as did my fellow travelers. We all learned the hard way who really runs Earth, and that there is really not an energy crisis at all, but my primary lesson was that the enemy is us, not the elites. Those who focus on elites as the root of our problems are thinking like victims, and that will not help us out of this mess. Only the combined positive intention of thinking and acting like the creators we are will get us through, and a world that resembles heaven on Earth beckons if only a tiny fraction of humanity woke up to what was really happening and what the potential was. Otherwise, I hope that I do not live to see what is likely coming.

Sermon over. I may publish that visionary post today, of what a day in the life of Roads' World might look like, but then I may go quiet for a few days. I have a lot on my plate right now.

Best,

Wade

[Chris Gilbert]

I've been reading your essay over the past two months. With non-fiction a tendency I've developed is to read the most important parts, and then skim over the rest. With your essay I keep revisiting various sections in order to fully digest it. I've spent most of the time reading the sections on human history and the significance of FE, while skimming some of the pre-human history. I'll probably keep rereading it as the years go by, along with checking the sources (I wish I had a 3000 book library at home ).

I find the material very easy to digest on an intellectual level. There are small areas where I disagree, but they're side issues that don't change the main thrust about FE and abundance. I do find though that on an emotional level it can hard to process at times, mostly due to the massive injustice and cruelty humanity has inflicted, along with the insights about how personal integrity can break down. There seem to be precious few moments and cultures in human history that I can feel a sense of affinity with, and they're generally small tribes or groups that were oppressed or outright wiped out.

I do actually know a handful of people who are aware of FE and it's suppression, or are at least open minded to the idea of energy from the vacuum. Quite often they're other aspiring complementary/alternative health practitioners like myself who are keenly aware of the tightrope one has to walk if they step outside the box of orthodox medicine. Many though when they do turn their focus on it think in terms of the failed strategies that have been attempted before to make FE public. I don't bother with trying to bring up FE with most people, but to hone my own communication and conceptual skills I do at times bring up how our current world came about from oil, and it's fast running out, along with other side issues mentioned in the essay.

An especially sobering thought for me is the realization that many of my close friends, and perhaps even myself, would not make it through with our integrity intact if we got thrown into Godzilla's meat grinder....

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Enishi:

Glad you are reading. Those small areas of disagreement can be areas of fruitful exchange. I sure do not have all the answers, and am only one guy. I plan to make future editions of that essay, and in places where my understanding is revised, I will update the essay. But you are wise to see that there are not going to be many places where the essay's basic thrust is open for challenge. Energy runs the show and always has, and we are fast running out of the energy that has powered the Industrial Revolution.

I know of nobody on Earth who has written anything remotely close to that essay, which is why I did it. It is intended to be an online textbook, to be repeatedly referred to, and I think that many will not digest it in linear fashion, but will do it like you are. However, if the comprehensive vision really begins sinking in, you will likely find yourself revisiting those sections that you skimmed and will gain a deeper appreciation for their relevance. While the ending picture will look similar, I respect different ways for people building it. I have been informed by leading figures that nothing like my essay's first half has ever been done on the Internet before, and I'll buy that.

What I have found is that readers can get bogged down when I either do not address, or briefly address and then move on, one of their pet areas of interest. Usually, the person is scientifically illiterate and does not understand why I do not give much credence to Velikovsky's hypothesis, or allegations of ancient civilizations whose stone architecture was built with advanced technology, or the reconstructions of fringe "historians" that nobody outside of their undiscerning audiences takes seriously. Those areas are usually ones where I looked into it myself and found it marginally valid at best, and even if valid, its importance is trivial when compared to the energy issue.

As you know, I essentially wrote a book on the medical racket, and I have heard that the medical racketeers are more vicious than the energy racketeers. So, I am keenly sympathetic to alternative practitioners who try to keep their heads down. On the integrity front, I am happy that I was never tested like Dennis was. One murder attempt, if I survived it, might have taken the wind out of my sails. It is the mark of wisdom to know what our limits are, and my "choir" approach is very consciously intended to not require heroic acts in order to be successful. There are not enough heroes on Earth for that approach to work.

Time for chores.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Choir Q&A.

Q: Wade, there is plenty of sex in your big essay, but no sex scenes! I want my money back.

A: Take your ticket to the front booth and they will refund what you paid. Sorry that it was not what you were looking for.

Seriously, sex is a fascinating issue, and when I began to study in earnest for my essay, beginning in about 2007, sex was an area where I was surprised a few times, and where I learned a lot. Sexual reproduction predates plants and animals, and is about a billion years old. Sex is thought to have come about as a way to speed up evolution through greater genetic novelty.

The name of the game for life on Earth is surviving long enough to reproduce, so the eating and sex urges are pronounced in all animals, as are their defensive mechanisms. Early on, sexual selection became a key evolutionary dynamic, and had to do with how females chose their mates. It may go back to very early aquatic animals, and it seems to be evident in early reptiles. Display goes way back, and humans play that game, too, as do civilizations.

Sexual selection led to pronounced dimorphism in simians, and humans inherited that trait. Monkeys are matrilocal, meaning that males left their natal societies to mate, but African apes reversed that trend, and it looks like all the way to humanity, even for Neanderthals, societies were patrilocal. Patrilocal ape societies, including humans, are highly violent and ruled by gangs of related males that think nothing of murdering infants that they did not father. When their food supply doubled when gorillas left the area, female and non-dominant male bonobos eliminated that situation, and bonobo societies are uniquely peaceful.

It seems to be the case that when the easy meat was hunted to extinction on Earth, women built on their gathering activities (humans long had a sexual division of labor, in which men hunted and women gathered) to raise the first crops. They thereby brought in proportionally more calories in comparison to men, women's status rose on those societies, and those became the first matrilocal societies in the human line going back at least ten million years and maybe twenty or more.

Where I was surprised and had to revise my views related to early civilizations and relations between the sexes. I long studied Europe's rape of the world, and was influenced by the peaceful savage meme that prevailed in anthropology and amongst native activists, and I was also influenced by feminist authors and anthropologists, of the Gimbutas variety.

I had to revise my views somewhat, and one was in how peaceful the natives were. Only matrilineal native societies were relatively peaceful, such as those of the Eastern Woodlands of North America before Europe began invading, as those were horticultural societies. If they were patrilocal (70% of preliterate societies), they were extremely violent. It turns out that preliterate societies were the most violent on Earth, proportionately. But anthropology was dominated by the peaceful savage meme that was not finally overturned until the late 20th century.

But feminist anthropologists of generations ago were not as wrong as they were made out to be by the defenders of orthodoxy. There really was a peaceful interlude in the human experience, in the early stages of agriculture in pristine civilizations. But when brute strength again became economically valuable, for handling draft animals and building civilization's infrastructure (and professional warriors laboring on behalf of states), women's status universally declined and did not really rise again until industrialization, when machines deprecated brute strength, and women and slaves were liberated.

Men still regularly sexually coerce woman, rape is still a very prevalent crime, and prostitution is still a profession. But if we turn the corner, relations between the sexes are going to change along with many other changes, and I can easily foresee the nuclear family becoming obsolete, and something far more enlightened replacing it.

So, sex is quite a fascinating subject, even without sex scenes.


I may go relatively quiet in the next few days, as I have a lot on my plate.

Best,

Wade

[Robin]

Hey Wade,

I finished your Big Essay and was overall able to mentally process it in its entirety, but there are still things that I'll have to go back and reference. I've read most of your other essays, but I still have more homework to do. I'm a trained biologist, and an experienced organic farmer, so it's easy for me to understand human Prehistory and how evolution factors in to the current human condition. I find that the degenerative pattern of human evolution and the idea of involution can be traced to one simple thing: warped perceptions.

The human triune brain is unknown to most people, and the very few people who do know about it only know very little. Examining the R-complex of the brain we will find embedded deep inside our primal animal instincts. Our Neo-cortex is what allows us to have such a higher awareness, and our Limbic System is what allows us to intuitively connect to our environment. All three parts of our brain are important, but when we situate our habits in one area, say the R-complex, the collective reality will turn out to be a paradigm based on scarcity that is fueled by a survival-of-the-fittest mentality.

I would very much agree with you that FE is the most important subject to discuss in the "alternative" field, and it most certainly is something that humans need to embrace if we are going to dig ourselves out of this steep downward slope through the toilet bowl we are flushing ourselves down with our ignorant actions. I have personally delved deep into the field of off-world beings manipulating our past and our current reality, the manipulation of bloodlines that rule the world, and the mind-control that is heavily being induced onto humanity. I know most of this is true, and there is no doubt in mind of the ET presence on this planet, because just like you and FE, I have experienced it first hand.

That being said, knowing about all of the other "alternative" conspiracy and fringe topics and how much Truth lies therein, I still stand by the notion that none of that matters as much as FE. We collectively have placed ourselves into this current condition, regardless of external manipulators pulling strings behind the scenes, and only we can bring ourselves out. I feel that if everybody threw all the other fringe topics metaphorically out the window and focused on FE, we would be a huge step closer to collective sovereignty.

It all starts with consciousness of the individual, and that means taking care of one's body to give the mind the right fuel to be able to align one's perceptions with Truth. To go off of your point about sex and its importance to human wellness, I would take it one step further and say that our ability to transcend animal instincts should be the main goal of all humans, irregardless if our existence on the earth is a cosmic accident or a divine order. By balancing our brain and embodying our masculine and feminine qualities (left and right brain), we need to stop being grounded in the R-complex and base our ideals more on cooperation than competition.

Part of this step, I believe, is transcending the way that we think about sex. Sexual alchemy, or inner alchemy, is a very well known physiological process among those in the upper echelons of secret societies and control structures. They understand the power that human semen and menstrual blood, men and women respectively, have on the bodies. When we expel these sacred fluids, we expel that valuable nutrients along with the seed. Most men are unable to resist the urge to ejaculate, which ends up causing a schism in a sexual/romantic relationship. Sexual alchemy is learning to suppress orgasm, and instead transcend the fluid up the body, turning "lead into gold" through physiological processes, so it turns into a nectar that the pineal gland (Philosopher's Stone) is bathed in. Those in the inner circles know full well that this helps elevate human consciousness, and is what ultimately separated us from the rest of the animal kingdom.

Men all around the world who are practicing self-control and orgasm document experiencing elevated consciousness, enhanced intuition, better self-control, high self-esteem and confidence, and an overall more focused mindset.

On a slightly different note, I believe that what we eat affects our higher capacity to see and make patterns around us, which is really what consciousness is. Just like you, I do not eat meat. I eat mostly raw fruits and veggies. The universe is made up entirely of vibration, and the vibration that we embody is directly influenced by the vibrations of our food.

Cheers,

Robin

[Chris Gilbert]

Posted by SamwiseTheBrave (here)

Part of this step, I believe, is transcending the way that we think about sex. Sexual alchemy, or inner alchemy, is a very well known physiological process among those in the upper echelons of secret societies and control structures. They understand the power that human semen and menstrual blood, men and women respectively, have on the bodies. When we expel these sacred fluids, we expel that valuable nutrients along with the seed. Most men are unable to resist the urge to ejaculate, which ends up causing a schism in a sexual/romantic relationship. Sexual alchemy is learning to suppress orgasm, and instead transcend the fluid up the body, turning "lead into gold" through physiological processes, so it turns into a nectar that the pineal gland (Philosopher's Stone) is bathed in. Those in the inner circles know full well that this helps elevate human consciousness, and is what ultimately separated us from the rest of the animal kingdom.

Men all around the world who are practicing self-control and orgasm document experiencing elevated consciousness, enhanced intuition, better self-control, high self-esteem and confidence, and an overall more focused mindset.

I agree in part, but what typically gets transmuted in alchemy is the Qi energy behind the desire for sex, rather than suppressing orgasm or transmuting the physical fluids themselves. The sexual retention techniques popularized by Mantak Chia for instance were originally a birth control method used before condoms, and have actually caused quite a bit of harm in many of the men who attempted them, in addition to relationship friction with their partners. Meditating or practicing other balanced methods that raise the vibration of one's consciousness will naturally transmute the desire for sex over time and thus reduce the compulsive need for orgasm, without forced suppression.

[Wade Frazier]

Hi guys:

I find myself with a little time this morning. Well, Robin, you get added to the list of those who finished the essay. Congrats. A lot of it takes a long time to “seat.” I do not want to get too esoteric/orgasmic here, but I will note what Seth had to say about the issue. He had a lot to say about sex, and one was that in an enlightened humanity, we would all have lots of sex. Seth also said that we have way over-identified with our genders. He said that humans had used sexuality to greatly limit our expression, as our human expressions get channeled into sex (similar to your “animal instincts” comment), and that when the “let it rip” Sexual Revolution began, Western humans actually became far more stunted in their human expression, not freed. He said that when/if we turned the corner, adolescents would not feel that pressure to act “grown up” and have sex, and sex would have a healthy place within our human expressions.

Michael also had plenty to say about sex, and Lyssa Royal’s channeled Future Sex was a pretty amazing read. Michael stated that humans are more sexually differentiated than 95% of all ensouled species in our galaxy, and some channels said that because of that differentiation, you could almost refer to men and women as separate species. Seth also said, however, that most of the seeming differences between men and women were the result of conditioning, not biology. I see validity in all of those perspectives. All humans have far more in common than they do differences, while the genders certainly play their roles.

I recall Werner Erhard (est’s founder) saying that humans (this was in the swinging 1970s) saying that people were using sex to get at ecstasy, and that when humans came at sex from a place of ecstasy, that it would leap an octave and have little resemblance to what we see today.

All chakras are important, but the heart is the keystone, IMO, and when sex comes from the heart chakra, not the root or crown, then it is going to look radically different. That is also why I keep stating that a person’s heart has to be in the right place, first, to help FE along, or the rest will not matter:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post872800

That can be considered an “esoteric” understanding, but it is also what I discovered the hard way on my journey. It is a “battle-tested” understanding.

On animals, ETs, and the like, for me, it all goes back to the heart, us achieving true sentience and “sovereignty” as the creators that we are, and when we do that, so much that seems mysterious, strange, and the like will become clear in ways that we really cannot imagine today. In this world:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post672748

they have a relationship with nature that is truly hard to comprehend today, and as I plunk along on my story of what a day in a life in that world might be like (maybe next week! ), my mind is definitely challenged. I remember Seth saying that you could learn more by observing an animal than you could by reading anything, including his work (or mine! ), and Seth said that we had forgotten to heed to the wisdom of our flesh, which animals were still in touch with. Animals do not question their relationship with God like we do, which is one of the “blessings” of being ensouled.

These are huge subjects, obviously, and I doubt that there is one Oracle of Truth on them, and people can definitely get lost the weeds, etc., if they are not careful. All the best mystical sources state that each person needs to find what resonates for them, and if I can find 5,000-7,000 who can resonate with the paradigm that my big essay imparts, FE would be a done deal, and we can see what happens next.

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/humanity.htm#numbers

The fact is that 99.9% of the population will cling to today’s “system” out of fear of the unknown and embracing the “devil they know,” and they will not begin to understand until FE is delivered into their lives, just as with the previous epochal events:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/humanity.htm#imagine

Glad that you both did not find the essay intellectually challenging. My intent is that people without much scientific training will also get the essay’s gist. If it has to be all scientists, I am not sure how well my idea will work.

I’ll finish my noting what I have written about before. Michael stated that all ensouled species had some “hardwired” biological circuitry that allowed them to have essence (soul) contact, and in humans, it is the ability to have an orgasm. Other ensouled species have different mechanisms, and he mentioned that one had a vocalization, like orgasmic singing. All creatures on Earth try to feel good and avoid pain. Nature has made those proclivities recipes for survival. A full stomach feels good for a reason, and hunger has its purpose. Horny young people are partly responding to their biology’s call to procreate. Humans, as we are learning to be sentient beings, play with those states, and their abuse and often-grotesque distortions are part of the challenge that comes with having a physical body (and a great way to rack up negative karma! ). I definitely agree that the path to true sentience is to recognize those biological urges and yet not have them dictate our behaviors. As Enishi stated, humans have inflicted awesome cruelties on each other during the human journey, and I certainly will not gainsay that. However, I will say that the human in-group has continually grown, and the awesome brutalities that were commonplace in all early civilizations, and even celebrated, such as the Coliseum’s festivities:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/humanity.htm#gladiators

are no longer acceptable cultural practices. So, that is “progress,” and so is the end of chattel slavery, even if it was only due to machines making the institution economically obsolete:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/humanity.htm#demographic

These are big, big subjects, and this thread I hope becomes a place for choir tryouts, so I encourage discussion of these topics here.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Just one more comment, to more fully address Robin’s and Enishi’s comments. I believe it was in Lyssa Royal’s work, when discussing Pleiadian sex (and they have sex at the drop of a hat, kind of like bonobos), in that men had conscious control over expelling the seed, and women had conscious control over whether to use that seed to conceive. Humans are a ways from having that ability.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

The USA is taking a blowtorch to the powder keg, as usual, and this time, we are playing with nuclear dynamite:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-0...e-could-lead-n

The evil insanity of what my great nation is doing is mind-boggling.

Best,

Wade

[Robin]

What keeps coming up again over and over again for me is that people have an incessant disposition for requiring physical, concrete evidence that they can perceive through the five senses in order to even give a modicum of thought to alternative explanations of the nature of our reality. At one point, it is understandable. As a trained scientist, I know that following the scientific method is the only real way to be sure of accuracy and precision. I also know that common sense, logic, and intuition through heavy discernment is required for one to objectively perceive the world as it is.

Though this is a good way to perceive reality - which I adhere to - I cannot help but ironically see this as a great limitation to human development. In my opinion, the other part of being human is having the emotional faculty to trust other humans. In our everyday lives, our close friends and family members experience phenomena that others do not. This is all part of the individuation of consciousness. Every day we accept the notions of friends, family, and acquaintances without being provided bullet-proof evidence.

For instance, what if somebody visited their mother, and their mother tells them over a cup of tea that she recently found a hundred dollar bill on the street and then dropped it accidentally in the chimney fire as she was stoking wood? Would this person believe her story? It doesn't sound too crazy, really. It would be subjective depending on the person, of course, but it is very likely a story that would be believed by most people. But is there solid evidence to back the story? Of course not! The money was vaporized in flames, and we must use our emotional faculty to believe that our Mother would tell the Truth.

In the judicial system, the court most of the time relies on witness testimonial to make a verdict. Thousands of innocent people are sent to prison each year because of the faulty system, and likewise there are many people who are let off when they are guilty. There is no way around it. We need to use our emotional faculty in accordance with the scientific method, guided by common sense, logic, and intuition.

That being said, it really bothers me when people demand evidence that a certain conspiracy is happening right in front of their noses. When you take the same points I just illustrated concerning personal issues and apply them to a larger scale, most people do not see the correlation. If one's Mother accidentally incinerates a hundred dollar bill in the fire, is telling the Truth, and one believes the Truth, then how unimaginable would it be for a government to "accidentally" incinerate billions of dollars? How unimaginable would it be for the government to be lying?

After all, the governments of the world have lied before. There is concrete evidence of governments covering up evidence, lying, stealing, cheating, plundering, raping, and slandering. One clear example is the Watergate Scandal with Nixon. If this sort of behavior has occurred in the past - even at least once! - then why is it ridiculous that it is still happening, all the time?

There is nothing wrong with seeking evidence, but when one only bases their judgments on concrete evidence, and dismisses the other important aspects of seeking Truth - such as using logic, common sense, and intuition, as well as trust in our fellow humans (which really means using all of our brain in balance) - then they are willfully staying in a state of ignorance.

When it comes to FE, there is a plethora of evidence, and there is a cornucopia of witness testimonial from respectable sources. Again, the trust factor of our emotional faculty must decide whether or not to believe the testimony. In my opinion, the collective lack of trust in our fellow man and woman, and ironic trust in government, is indicative of the depressing state of human consciousness. The Statist mentality is an inhibitor to human progress; we need to start having trust in ourselves.

[Melinda]

Posted by SamwiseTheBrave (here)
...After all, the governments of the world have lied before... [...] ...When it comes to FE, there is a plethora of evidence, and there is a cornucopia of witness testimonial from respectable sources. Again, the trust factor of our emotional faculty must decide whether or not to believe the testimony. In my opinion, the collective lack of trust in our fellow man and woman, and ironic trust in government, is indicative of the depressing state of human consciousness. The Statist mentality is an inhibitor to human progress; we need to start having trust in ourselves.

I've raised this point with people before. Why is it that people are prepared to accept stories of conspiracy throughout history, whether true or fictional, as believable, yet have a hard time accepting it in the present? Countless films, plays and books have been produced and culturally accepted which detail stories of violent and destructive conspiracies.

I think the reason it's harder to accept in the present is the threat of violence and rejection in our immediate lives. Getting too close to the truth and speaking out too loudly with it can be life-risking behaviour. I believe most people can sense this, even if they won't admit it to themselves. You can (superficially) feel a lot better about yourself day to day if you say "there's nothing to be feared," than if you admit there is something lurking in the shadows. Being aware at some level that you are lying to yourself also makes you inherently less likely to trust others.

Even without speaking out against corruption at a corporate level, like with the suppression of FE or the unethical practice of big pharma, the threat of violence permeates society. If you don't pay your taxes to support a corrupt government you didn't elect, you can be thrown in jail by force. If you try to run away from the courts that would judge you, you can be jailed by force. If you can't make enough money to pay for your home you can be thrown out by force and made homeless, and life on the streets can lead to a violent underworld in and of itself. In a society glued together by the threat of violence, you have a fearful mindset that does not support true sovereignty or advancing consciousness.

The real fear amidst deniers of conspiracy and suppression is perhaps not of the threat posed by the problem-makers, but a fear of not knowing what to do about it, and the sense of helplessness that comes with that. The thing of it is... the more of us admit to the problem and commit to brainstorming the solution, the more likely we are to come up with the very solutions we fear we lack.

FE is one such solution, and implementing it peacefully is where the brainstorming could be truly be healing and pioneering. For those willing to keep breathing life into it with love, integrity and imagination.

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Robin, your query is a big part of why I strongly suggest that people have mystical and other kinds of awakenings, so they can see how limited consensus reality is:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post872800

The process of science is using inductive reasoning/intuition to develop hypotheses, and then use physical evidence and deductive reasoning to test them:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/humanity.htm#theories

Materialists and “skeptics” generally ignore or are incapable of achieving that first step, and think that the second step is the be-all, end-all. “Skeptics” reasonably say that your family may believe you without seeing it, that you have a horse in your yard, but if you said that you had a unicorn, that they will want to come see it for themselves before they believe you. FE and its organized suppression are in that “unicorn” category, because both realities blow people’s consensus realities out of the water. People have to have experience before they wake up from consensus reality (AKA “the herd”).

When people demand impossible or unreasonable “proofs” (all the while firmly rooted in their armchairs), they are just taking the easy way out, so that their framework is not challenged. Even scientists, or maybe especially scientists, do that:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/radleft.htm#circular

as they play the Level 3 game:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/humanity.htm#level3

I would not waste my time with such people, especially where FE is concerned. Nobody is as blind as those who refuse to see. Again, 99.9% of the world will not begin to understand FE and abundance until it is delivered into their lives, just like with the other epochal events:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/humanity.htm#imagine

The statist mentality is just one of many ways that people play the victim and look to something outside of themselves for their safety/salvation/etc. Structuralism and conspiracism are two other victim-oriented frameworks:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#weakness

Only those needles in haystacks are going to understand not only FE and its organized suppression, but also realize that raising their awareness will be a critical step in getting humanity over the hump. They already were well on their way to reaching the “choir” stage, and they will understand the power of enlightened (AKA “sentient”) individuals pooling their awareness and action, and only need a little help from somebody like me. If I can find 5,000 like that, FE is a done deal:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/humanity.htm#numbers

I have presented more than enough evidence so that people willing to do the work will understand that organized suppression is a very real and potentially deadly phenomenon. “Proving” that FE technology is real is harder, because of the organized suppression. I am an astronaut’s biographer:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#intro

and was a central participant in some the greatest efforts yet made to bring alternative energy to market:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy1.htm#run

and I have provided heavily documented accounts of those events:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/advent.htm#financier

It is more than enough to grab the attention of those I am looking for, and for those who do their homework, they will understand that my story is even more spectacular than I have publicly disclosed, and what I have written about Dennis’s and Brian’s stories are tales for the ages:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/humanity.htm#adventures

So, if those who digest my work want to have an FE machine delivered to their homes before they will begin to credit the reality, they simply will not be any help for what I am doing. But they can still understand how energy runs the world and always has.

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/humanity.htm#energyevents

Hi Melinda:

Yes indeed, that deep, almost unconscious fear is what keeps people happily digesting “fictional” or real conspiratorial yarns relating to times long ago (like how Julius Caesar and several other Roman emperors got it), but violently denying that it is happening today. But that largely has to do with keeping their “consensus” reality framework intact. Almost all people refuse to believe that they participate in evil systems, so they all have their in-group ideologies that exalt their group at the expense of others:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#dominant

The most trapped are what I have called Level 3s:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/humanity.htm#level3

Part of the awakening process is to realize that those “conspiracies” are happening today, but another trap is seeing them as the root of our problems, when they are only a symptom:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/paradigm.htm#weakness

It is only when we begin to think like creators instead of victims, and when love instead of fear dominates our perceptions, that we can begin to see the way out. Otherwise, we just keep looking for something to give our power away to, instead of claiming our divine power.

Best,

Wade

[Robin]

The Tesla Science Foundation put on a conference over the weekend in New York, and their main agenda was to discuss ways of bringing Tesla into school curriculums in the U.S. and all around the world. It seems that they had a good lineup of speakers, and I think that the subject matter is especially important. I have a friend who attended the conference, and am eager to hear how it went.

I read a book about eight years ago called ACDC: The Savage Tale of the First Standards War, and it really changed my entire outlook on the reality of life. I was about 16 years old at the time, but the profundity of the apparent brutality of Capitalism and how it turns people into greedy, money-mongering profiteers stuck with me. Most of all, I was exposed to the reality of alternative thinkers, like Tesla, being subjected to the dictates of the constant lack of funding and appreciation of the government and private interests.

That book and its message about Tesla stuck with me all throughout college when I realized that it is impossible for one to obtain a science degree without conforming to the standards of the curriculum. The rigid grading system was painful for me, because my mind does not work like most other people who study science. My mind loves to explore alternative aspects of reality, and I have an affinity to question the status quo, even if that means the current scientific paradigm accepted by most scientists.

It was a difficult journey getting a degree in biology, and I quickly realized after I graduated that being a professional scientists in today's world means succumbing to the fact that your research is entirely dependent on funding. I found that working for the government on a project to study native bees to better understand their population decline was not important at all for the government. When it was inevitable that the government would rather spend their funds on war and useless endeavors and pull away from studies on the environment, I was left without work, which was work that I truly did love.

Instead of continuing to work for the government and beg for funding like a dog for a bone, I simply left. And I never looked back. Instead, I've been continuing my organic farming endeavor, which truly is freeing and rewarding!

I learned firsthand what it's like to work on a project that would seriously benefit the planet and all its denizens, only to be put on the shelf to collect dust to make room for economic projects. Personally, I'd rather be jobless and homeless than to beg for funding like a dog for a bone to the government. There should never be a lack of funding for projects that help the environment, but the sad Truth is that the world Elite do not care. I can relate to Tesla in certain aspects, and I understand the inner pain he must have felt when he was ignored and harassed his whole life for his alternative mindset.

Anyway, if I'm leading discussion in the wrong direction, please let me know. These were thoughts that I felt like I needed to get out.

Robin

[Wade Frazier]

Hell, Robin!

That is what this thread is all about. Thank you very much for that post, and it is more topical than you think. I met this weekend with an environmental scientist about my age, and it inspired a coming post, once I get some other odds and ends out of the way.

Best,

Wade