Anti-gravity equation discovered and explained

[WhiteLove]

Here is the anti-gravity equation that I've discovered, along with an explanation. Please enjoy!

1)

Fgrav = (G * m * M) / r^2

2)

Fgrav = (j * m * v^2) / (2 * R)

3)

R = (j * m * v^2) / (2 * Fgrav)

4)

Felec = (q * Q) / (4 * pi * e * r^2)

5)

(2)Fgrav = (4)Felec
(j * m * v^2) / (2 * R) = (q * Q) / (4 * pi * e * r^2)
m = (2 * R * q * Q) / (j * v^2 * 4 * pi * e * r^2)

6)

(1)Fgrav = (G * m * M) / r^2
Fgrav = (M * G * R * q * Q) / (r^4 * j * v^2 * 2 * pi * e)

7)

(3)R = (j * m * v^2) / (2 * Fgrav)
Fgrav^2 = (M * G * j * m * v^2 * q * Q) / (4 * pi * e * j * r^4 * v^2)

8.1)

Fgrav = root ((M * G * j * m * v^2 * q * Q) / (4 * pi * e * j * r^4 * v^2))
Fgrav = root ((G * m * M * q * Q) / (4 * pi * e * r^4))

8.2)

or since Fgrav = m * a
Fgrav = (G * M * q * Q) / (4 * pi * e * r^4 * a)

where

G = Newton's universal gravitational constant
m = Mass of object 1
M = Mass of object 2
q = Charge of object 1
Q = Charge of object 2
e = Permittivity of space
r = Distance between object 1 and object 2

9)

Like charges repel

10)

Unlike charges attract

11)

Gravity

(8.1)Fgrav = root ((G * m * M * q * Q) / (4 * pi * e * r^4))
or
(8.2)Fgrav = (G * M * q * Q) / (4 * pi * e * r^4 * a)

where q and Q are (10) unlike charges that attract

12)

Anti-gravity

(8.1)Fantigrav = root ((G * m * M * q * Q) / (4 * pi * e * r^4))
or
(8.2)Fantigrav = (G * M * q * Q) / (4 * pi * e * r^4 * a)

where q and Q are (9) like charges that repel

In other words, Isaac Newton's force of universal law of gravity A can be joined with the electric force as definied by coulomb's law B, in a direct relationship as root (A * B). Here I am demonstrating this relationship through the force of rotational energy.

13)

The magnetic force is F = qv x B, so that's the next force to get into that equation. It might be root(root((G * m * M * q^3 * Q * v^2) / (4 * pi * e * r^4)) x B). From (8.2)Fgrav = m * a, we can then simplify the equation as:

Fgrav = root((G * m * M * q^3 * Q * v^2) / (4 * pi * e * r^4)) / (m * a) x B

which in turn can be simplified as:

Fgrav = (1 x B) * ((G * M * q^3 * Q * v^2) / (4 * pi * e * r^4 * a) x B)

So in conjunction with the magnetic force, the mass of one of the objects does not impact on the gravity/anti-gravity. Very interesting! If this is true Newton's universal law of gravitation is true only in an environment without a magnetic force present impacting on it, because the magnetic force according to the equation appears to make one of the object's weightless, meaning that object under such condition then has no inherent mass. This strongly indicates that a key to reaching anti-gravity much easier is by also taking advantage of the magnetic force in the anti-gravity solution. This could help explain why you can have those huge motherships/planets being operated by anti-gravity.

14)

This in turn >>might<< be simplified as:

Fgrav = (G * M * q^3 * Q * v^2) / (4 * pi * e * r^4 * a) x B^2

I am not sure if this is a valid mathematical simplification of a cross product though. Please when possible correct this!

15)

If the above is correct, it would mean the following:

Fgrav = (G * M * q^3 * Q * v^2) / (4 * pi * e * r^4 * a) x B^2
->
Fgrav = (Fnewtongrav * Felec * Fmagn^2) / (m * a)
->
Fgrav = (Fnewtongrav * Felec * Fmagn^2) / (Fnewtongrav)

because the only component missing in the equation from being able to express Fnewtongrav is m and because we can add an imaginary component m of any value in a division without distorting the value, similar to 2/2 = (2m)/(2m) , we can insert m on both sides of the / sign to complete the Fnewtongrav component and hence get rid of the entire Newton universal law of gravitation component from the whole equation.

In other words, Isaac Newton's universal law of gravitation is rendered obsolete by combining the electric and magnetic force in the relationship:

Fgrav = Felec * Fmagn^2

or

Fgrav = (q * Q) / (4 * pi * e * r^2) * (q * v)^2 x B^2

This would yield an electromagnetic gravity/anti-gravity force, where the polarity relationship between the objects would describe whether the two attract (force of gravity) or repel (force of anti-gravity). This force shows that you can achieve anti-gravity through the electromagnetic anti-gravity force without having to care about the masses of the objects directly, no matter their inherent or relative masses, they will still attract or repel.

16)

The frequency of the peak anti-gravity force one can calculate from v = 2 * pi * f * r -> f = v / (2 * pi * r).

Hence, the most simplified anti-gravity formula becomes:

Fantigrav = (q^3 * Q * pi * f^2) / e x B^2

where q and Q are (9) like charges that repel

In order to make a UFO levitate - earth has a negative charge of about half a million coulombs - you would charge the UFO with a negative charge. Furthermore, in order to lessen this charge requirement, you would use magnetism. Nikola Tesla has proved that as the potential increases, so does the magnetism. So there is a mutual relationship between the two, as the above equations also indicate. The force to overcome at earth's surface is ~58.6 * 10^24 N. Exactly what kind of electrical design you would take advantage of when designing this kind of UFO you can speculate on, but logically you would want this craft to not turn into an enormously warm object with high radition levels but rather maintain its temperature at "possible" levels inside the craft. Since the gravity weakens as you get farther and farther away from the earth's core - as can be understood by r^2 in Newton's universal law of gravitation equation N = (G * m * M) / r^2, the starting point at the surface of the earth is the most critical, as you get higher and higher up the temperature also drops, which helps to cool down the object. You would probably want to do UFO testing at the north pole.

[yelik]

Interesting, all I've got to do now is build one and try it, then get arrested or taken out, lol

[WhiteLove]

Posted by yelik (here)
Interesting, all I've got to do now is build one and try it, then get arrested or taken out, lol

Heh, lol

[lightning23]

you pretty much nailed it! good job!

[WhiteLove]

Posted by lightning23 (here)
you pretty much nailed it! good job!

Thanks!

[Jake]

Awesome work, I am intrigued... (though I had to read it a couple of times, lol...)

okay, so I have a question.. I am no expert, so please take that into consideration...

These calculations are based on the gravity of a large planetary object.. ie,,, a craft designed to negate the specific gravity effect of a specific density and charge... So what if this craft were in space, and not anywhere near a large body, so there is no gravity?? There would be no enertia,, but how do we use 'gravity' for thrust if there is no gravity? Getting off planet would be easy, but then how do we travel through space?

Jake..

[ghostrider]

Posted by Jake (here)
Awesome work, I am intrigued... (though I had to read it a couple of times, lol...)

okay, so I have a question.. I am no expert, so please take that into consideration...

These calculations are based on the gravity of a large planetary object.. ie,,, a craft designed to negate the specific gravity effect of a specific density and charge... So what if this craft were in space, and not anywhere near a large body, so there is no gravity?? There would be no enertia,, but how do we use 'gravity' for thrust if there is no gravity? Getting off planet would be easy, but then how do we travel through space?

Jake..

traveling in space is done by beaming ... they beam energy in the direction they want to go , and the craft follows the beam , like a surf board on a wave ...once a safe distance is reached from planets , they collapse time and space creating null time , and jump in a fraction of a second to go anywhere they want ... hyper-space ... all the forces pushing against the ship build up , and at the precise moment they lower their energy screens and all that force is absorbed and turned into energy flinging the ship into hyperspace ... they ships require two drives , one for planetary travel and one for deep space travel ... one to reach up to the speed of light , and one surpassing the speed of light millions and billions of times over ...http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Bil...ntact_Report_4 scroll to line 33 ...

[WhiteLove]

Posted by Jake (here)
Awesome work, I am intrigued... (though I had to read it a couple of times, lol...)

okay, so I have a question.. I am no expert, so please take that into consideration...

These calculations are based on the gravity of a large planetary object.. ie,,, a craft designed to negate the specific gravity effect of a specific density and charge... So what if this craft were in space, and not anywhere near a large body, so there is no gravity?? There would be no enertia,, but how do we use 'gravity' for thrust if there is no gravity? Getting off planet would be easy, but then how do we travel through space?

Jake..

Thanks a lot! My understanding, based on what I'm seeing in the relationships and the data I'm using, is that there is no point in space where you don't have a gravitational force, a body in space will always have a nearest body with greatest density and charge that it is going to drift towards, therefore you are always drifting in space whether you like it or not, although in relative terms it might appear you are totally still in space. The gravitational force of God is infinitely strong. But then you have layers upon layers of nested gravitational fields from the macro level to the micro level, down to infinity, but it's always the higher level/parent gravitational field that is attracting, hence the spinning around that body/center. The planet in our solar systems appear to sit inside of a gravitational bubble with the sun as the main attractor, which in turn seems to sit in an even greater gravitational bubble (star cluster), ultimately with the center of the galaxy as its main attractor. Furthermore, each body/point in space appears to have a totally unique charge and density, which means that by understanding the charge and density of a target body one can design a craft with the capability required to align to that charge and density. One can of course also dial in a small anti-gravity force towards some distant galaxy without actually ending up there, or adjust it along the way. But for star to star or galaxy to galaxy travelling you would probably find it most efficient to take advantage of the center of gravity at each parent gravitational field in order to get the energy requirements down and speed up the travelling. This might also be required in order not to crash into other objects at a too high speed, since all bodies spin around the main attractor you have to tunnel through. Another thing is that the various gravitational centers at each higher parent gravitational field, might actually sit in separate dimensions, separated in the physical domain.

[ghostrider]

Gravity is the cousin of electromagnetism ...

[Mutchie]

A comment above caught my eye ... Lets say one of us had the ability to create a craft that had anti grav propulsion do you really think WE WOULD BE KILLED BECAUSE WE HAD CRACKED THE FORMULA ???

I hear of storys like the military using crafts like the TR3b if that is true ... we have anti grav

Why is it being kept from the general population the things we could use it for would nothing short of Amazing

[WhiteLove]

Posted by Mutchie (here)
A comment above caught my eye ... Lets say one of us had the ability to create a craft that had anti grav propulsion do you really think WE WOULD BE KILLED BECAUSE WE HAD CRACKED THE FORMULA ???

I hear of storys like the military using crafts like the TR3b if that is true ... we have anti grav

Why is it being kept from the general population the things we could use it for would nothing short of Amazing

My theory about this is that when such a formula is cracked it leads you towards overunity, which in turn leads the people to freedom. Another thing is the national security aspect of it, there might be people that find it's better to kill the people with this kind of knowledge and let this kind of revolution happen under greater control. There might be higher intelligences involved as well, who can see where it is leading to - both positive and negative intelligences. And then of course there are those that kill just to maintain power here on earth. So it's a combination. What can be said though is that free energy/anti-gravity in the hands of a people that wants peace, is a very positive thing!

[Tesla_WTC_Solution]

This is highly thought provoking and also bookmarked.

It's rare for a mathematician to explain things in terms that common folks like us can understand.
All in all it looks fairly doable!

[Kindred]

If you haven't seen this video, you may be pleasantly surprised...

Stan Deyo, who worked within the back-engineering groups, starting in about (did he say '71 or '81???) oh well... you'll hear and see with your own eyes and ears. (and, Yes, it has to do with magnetism... you cannot have an electric potential without it, just as you cannot have a magnetic potential without an electric field. But, when you 'get down to it'... all there IS, is Magnetism)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=CsagEYfxPgs

Enjoy!

[Mutchie]

Tesla hit it on the nail .... This thread is very thought provoking it was stuff such as the above which brought me here

A lot of GOOD people here at Avalon

[Hughe]

Another form of gravity manipulation - rotating object

CHRISTMAS LECTURES 1974: Eric Laithwaite - The Jabberwock
Lecture Four
In this lecture, Laithwaite used the behavioural gyroscopes in an attempt to challenge the validity of Newton’s Laws of motion and the laws of thermodynamics.
This proved extremely controversial and the vast majority of the scientific community did not accept his interpretation of gyroscopic behaviour.

http://www.richannel.org/christmas-l...the-jabberwock

[Nick Matkin]

Interesting, but beyond by mathematical comprehension I'm afraid.

One sentence did pop out and that is : "..earth has a negative charge of about half a million coulombs..." but with respect to what? Presumably the atmosphere.

Where else have you posted this work? I fear that if it is all original, not many of us on the Project Avalon forum will be able to provide critical feedback, or make use of it.

Nick

[Baby Steps]

Sorry what is j? Thanks!

[WhiteLove]

Posted by Baby Steps (here)
Sorry what is j? Thanks!

Np

Moment of Inertia, I = j * m * r^2

where

j is a shape/object based constant for determining the Moment of Inertia, earth's j constant ~0,331.

[Mandala]

I'm i the only one on the forum that sucks at math?

[Cristian]

Hi,

R in equation no2 is the Earth radius ...right.

So what's the use of equation no3 ?

I don't agree with your equation no2 . F grav =(j *m*v^2)/2R . I don't see how Fgrav can equal that. You have the values for ec. no1 and ec. no2 . Did you do the math and see if they are really equal?

Next...

Equation no 5 :
(2)Fgrav = (4)Felec How did that happen ? How can you put an equal sign there? If you can prove that you will get a Nobel prize for sure!

from wiki

Parallels between electrostatic and gravitational fields

Coulomb's law, which describes the interaction of electric charges:





is similar to Newton's law of universal gravitation:




where

This suggests similarities between the electric field E and the gravitational field g, or their associated potentials. Mass is sometimes called "gravitational charge" because of that similarity.

Electrostatic and gravitational forces both are central, conservative and obey an inverse-square law.