Has white man colonised planet Earth?

[Flash]

... did white colonised the planet (therefore are outisders originally), I would think that wherever humans are from, we are all quite well ingrained in this planet, with our bodies made up of its components, and therefore adapted to be able to grow here. THerefore, we are now from here, independently of where we came from originally.

I would not say the same for all viruses and microbes we have around, in the way the play havoc with our carbon base system. And i would not say the same either for the ways of thinking that are implemented on this planet, destructive to its life supporting énergies.

[DNA]

Posted by Lord Sidious (here)

Posted by LeoNorth (here)

Posted by Lord Sidious (here)
Let me put this to you.
Enlil wanted to wipe us out, Enki did not.
Enlil/jehovah is a homocidal maniac, but the question would be why?
Because we helped the Enki faction to beat Enlils faction in the war/s described in the vedas.
The genocide is a form of revenge.
The NSDAP knew that the forces controlling the world were lead by either a supernatural being or an extraterrestrial.
Goebbels gave a speech saying this, I have it in hard copy, but I can't find anything online.
Now, the next question, why did the SS have an archeology section and what were they looking for?

Posted by Andrew (here)
They were looking for the Ark?

Posted by Lord Sidious (here)
Aha, Raiders of the Lost Ark?
Yes.
And no.
They were looking for artifacts and found many.
Why?

were the SS was looking for a way to defeat Lord Enlil???

Very close.
I believe they were looking for Enki.
And they may have found him too.

Shut the ef up. No fraking way. Holy crap. I have never heard anything like this before.

This is good stuff, I'm on page 12 of this thread and I gotta tell you folks, it's really good, and worth your time.
I can't believe I skipped this thread back in the day due to my society planted issues on race and my resultant discomfort with all things nazi for fear of association.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by MorningFox
...

Posted by Flash
...

Posted by DNA
...

As noted in Post #640, I deleted a few posts.

[Calz]

Thank you Paul .... I wasn't going to go there ... but this thread deserves respect.

[DNA]

Posted by Calz (here)
Thank you Paul .... I wasn't going to go there ... but this thread deserves respect.

You seemed to have no problem while your lord was back handing the hell out of OnyxKnight through out the meat of this thread.

I have no problem with Paul's handling and erasing of these last few posts. I felt a possible escalation coming on. And it was really all to do about nothing.
But, that being said, this thread isn't exactly a holy stop on a pilgrimage road. Just saying, let's keep things in perspective is all.

[DNA]

Posted by karelia (here)

Posted by Andrew (here)
So is there war taking place now, with the Reich who are at the Antarctica?

And on the Moon. (? they were on the moon when we got there)

The war has never stopped. As Lord Sid pointed out, it was the Wehrmacht that capitulated unconditionally. The country NEVER capitulated. To this day, there is no peace treaty between the Allies and Germany. Germany does not have a constitution. If you wish to become a lawyer in Germany, you have to have the consent of the Allies. If they don't give it, tough; you can't practice then. This war has been going on and on and on. The only difference between pre-1945 and post-1945 is that the war continued behind the scenes, invisible to the public.

When Byrd went on his Antarctic "expedition," it was barely veiled as such; it was meant to be an invasion, but he was defeated within days. When in 1958, the US nuked Antarctica three times in the course of a month (August/September), it was another act of war against the Germans.

I've never heard this mention of Admiral Byrd's Antarctic expedition being a veiled attack against a defending Nazi regime. Nor had I heard anything about nukes being used. Would you know how I could find more data in this regard? Thank you

I will state that in a recent interview Kerry Cassidy did with Jim Nichols it was stated that Jim Parsons rocket work resulted in being used as attachments to the wings of airplanes to help them take off from aircraft carriers commanded by admiral Byrd in Antarctica.

[Andrew]

Posted by DNA (here)

Posted by karelia (here)

Posted by Andrew (here)
So is there war taking place now, with the Reich who are at the Antarctica?

And on the Moon. (? they were on the moon when we got there)

The war has never stopped. As Lord Sid pointed out, it was the Wehrmacht that capitulated unconditionally. The country NEVER capitulated. To this day, there is no peace treaty between the Allies and Germany. Germany does not have a constitution. If you wish to become a lawyer in Germany, you have to have the consent of the Allies. If they don't give it, tough; you can't practice then. This war has been going on and on and on. The only difference between pre-1945 and post-1945 is that the war continued behind the scenes, invisible to the public.

When Byrd went on his Antarctic "expedition," it was barely veiled as such; it was meant to be an invasion, but he was defeated within days. When in 1958, the US nuked Antarctica three times in the course of a month (August/September), it was another act of war against the Germans.

I've never heard this mention of Admiral Byrd's Antarctic expedition being a veiled attack against a defending Nazi regime. Nor had I heard anything about nukes being used. Would you know how I could find more data in this regard? Thank you

I will state that in a recent interview Kerry Cassidy did with Jim Nichols it was stated that Jim Parsons rocket work resulted in being used as attachments to the wings of airplanes to help them take off from aircraft carriers commanded by admiral Byrd in Antarctica.

There is also another interview Kerry Cassidy did with Dr Richard Allan Miller and he says that the Allies Nuked a Nazi base in Antartica in 1967 (would have to confirm it was this year he said). Not sure which interview exactly, one of the later ones I think.

[Roisin]

Did the interbreeding between Neanderthals and Homo Sapiens result in a species more receptive toward the principles of Nazism? Is there a genetic pre-disposition of the resulting hybrid of that combo intellectually embracing that ideology on a mass scale like what we saw happen in Nazis Germany? Is there a demographically larger concentration of hybrids of that kind with a higher percentage of Neanderthal genes in the region of the world where Germany is located resulting in an intense focus of nationalism and race than any other region of the world?
If this is true, I find this very unsettling because German-Americans are America's largest single ethnic group.

[Agape]

The whole topic has actually everything to do with climatic zones and different evolutionary periods ( of humans ) on earth rather than anything else .

Firstly , all humans are descendants of an ancient ET race ( and I gave details about it in my testimony ) and their origins can be traced to single group of ancestors who came to this planet tens of millions years ago.
That's a very long time .

Secondly , from these first settlers and proto-humans several - many human sub-groups evolved with many different characteristics . We are speaking of millions of years of human history here, not thousands .
So imagining that your todays 'white man' is some kind of 'direct ancestor' or closest model to the original is something like .. well, like your believe that you've actually evolved from more intelligent group of apes .

None of the hominids whose remains are found by todays palaeontologists 'evolved' further , except for they have accidentally or less interbred with so call 'modern man lineage' but by themselves, they were either cross-breeds of primitive man with apes or other animals ( it's not only apes ..) or degenerated human lineages .
Possessed of some higher cognitive faculties but fairly animal instincts made them weaker rather than stronger ,
they were not able to make it further and their remains are quite scarce .

If you look at the last 'visible' 'evolution epoch' to do with mankind , the pre- and post- glacial period that lasted in broad sense some 300 000 years , and in narrow sense , ten times less ..
starting from the 'global cooling' and forced migration of tribes either close to the equator or north and south poles that were at certain periods lush green ,
and then consider what kind of isolated evolution and fate they suffered ,

and what had happened after the ice age started to recede in the 'middle climatic zones' you will understand why the 'caucasian race' , relatively youngest took over the power .
The 'youngest' always do suppose their conditions are more ideal .

Older human groups who moved before, as I've said , either to the north or close to the equator had to fight for survival even if they were previously much better evolved , for some 100 000 of years , at least , and imagine what 1000 years means to you now .
Naturally , you don't meet many 'sun tanned' people living at the far north ?

And if you go live to Saharan Africa today which by the way was also much more hospitable place times upon times during its history , your skin will turn darker in mere 20 years . What to speak about skin of your tens generation grandchildren ?

Don't you have eyes people ?

You have to adapt to the climate , no matter where you live .

The so called 'caucasian race' evolved somewhere in the middle , 'fairly recently' from historical point of view , it does not mean that there were not older white races or various coloured people before, those who you won't meet anymore nowadays

but kindly look under your skin and what color your tongue has and organs and their functions etc etc and of course there are minor differences and always will be,
your children who will live in the North will be different from your children who will in the South ,
after thousands of years , they will be fairly different people .

White is nice and it's true that our ET ancestors were also 'white light' but they were not made of human flesh !!! and could show any colour they chose .
I'm sorry if you can't understand that part ,
and I am also very sorry that no one here finds any deeper interest in my origins of mankind report ,
since you are attracted to the mixed bag of mixed opinions and agendas and famous 'prophets' claiming any information 'sent to them by heaven' , changing the story for you on a go.

But what I started saying is that 'white is nice' but very vulnerable , psycho-somatically , the weakest race on earth , so also prone to many genetic and civilisation diseases , in long profile ,
its only chance for survival in long term is what you probably call 'racial mixing' , so true also for the others .

Every expression of human genome on this planet is unstable , it is forced to evolve, move on, improve , successfully or less , or die off , in long term of thousands of years again.

Climatic situation poses serious concern and threat in itself even without human action because this planet is relatively young and these periodical climatic cycles are bound to occur in future too , often accompanied by huge local shifts and calamities ,
it means that in some faraway future , hundreds or thousands of years people will be forced to massive migration from where they are now .

The planet is managing its ecosystem on very 'grass roots level' because it's ideal so far for the more primitive forms of life and to them this does not mean a lot .


You know, in past .. till now, if you go to any remote tribe or village ( group or nation ) living thousands of miles away from other humans , each of them , no matter their morphological features believed that THEY are the right people ,
the chosen ones, their ancestors, myths, legends, blood etc etc were the sacred and original item .. why ,
because of thousands of years of isolation of one group from another .

Now the population on this globe rose from millions to billions in few thousands of years,
that's a very huge leap .

It's also misguiding your idea about how your ancestors felt and looked upon the planet and the universe, how strong or weak they felt,
what they truly believed, how lonely it's been here times to times .

Guess I will stop here ..


but look under your skin before claiming some kind of nonsense .

[TargeT]

Posted by Roisin (here)
Did the interbreeding between Neanderthals and Homo Sapiens result in a species more receptive toward the principles of Nazism? Is there a genetic pre-disposition of the resulting hybrid of that combo intellectually embracing that ideology on a mass scale like what we saw happen in Nazis Germany? Is there a demographically larger concentration of hybrids of that kind with a higher percentage of Neanderthal genes in the region of the world where Germany is located resulting in an intense focus of nationalism and race than any other region of the world?
If this is true, I find this very unsettling because German-Americans are America's largest single ethnic group.

I wouldn't say "nazism" spesifically, but "collectivism" yes... for example:

In the US nearly every large city is predominantly democratic, (aka collectivist) everywhere ELSE in the US (smaller population, or less dense population areas) is conservative; this is a very strange phenomenon but apparently seems to be repeated around the world.

Collectivists give up their decision making power to the group (in their mind) which usually means in reality they give thier power up to a very small group that has leveraged control of the collective; it's just an inherently easily corrupted situation.

we are also predisposed to "novelty" (otherwise referred to as spirituality) and can easily be lead to follow a god figure (in the past more so than now).

And to top those two off we have an incredible tolerance for mild discomfort (how do you boil a frog?) and since our perception changes what we consider "mild" this can slowly be worked up to some pretty spectacular situations (Nazi Germany for example, or China, where there are 1 BILLION people under the boot of a (comparatively) small group of government officials).


to me these are three basic programing "catch all's" for population control... If we are a sub race I'm sure we were created with a few "fail safes" and I think it very likely that those three could be exactly that.

[Wind]

Do take a look at the Cayce readings (the most consistent data source there is known to man) regarding Atlantis and Lemuria, our mother cultures, that explains a lot about races and some other things. The further we go back in time, the more it becomes obscure and impalpable to our minds.

The size of Atlantis was equal to that of Europe, including Asia in Europe. He saw visions of a continent which had gone through three major periods of division; the first two about 15,600 BCE, when the mainland was divided into islands. The three main islands Cayce named Poseida, Og and Aryan.

(Q) Are the places designated for the beginning of the five races correct? (A) As we find, these are changed, in that: Those in the Gobi, the yellow. The white - rather in the Carpathians than India, though this is the change to which they are made. The red, of course, in the Atlantean and in the American. The brown in the Andean. The black in the plain and the Sudan, or in African.

(Q) Where was the Carpathian region? (A) Aarat. (Q) Where is the location? Is it on the map today? (A) Southern part of Europe and Russia, and Persia and that land. Caucasian mountains.

Q) Why was the number five selected for the projection of the five races? (A) This, as we find, is that element which represents man in his physical form, and the attributes to which he may become conscious FROM the elemental or spiritual to the physical consciousness. As the senses; as the sensing OF the various forces that bring to man the activities in the sphere in which he finds himself.

(Q) Did the appearance of what became the five races occur simultaneously? (A) Occurred at once.

(Q) Are the following the correct places? Atlantean, the red. (A) Atlantean and American, the red race.

(Q) Upper Africa for the black? (A) Or what would be known now as the more WESTERN portion of upper Egypt for the black. You see, with the changes -when there came the uprisings in the Atlantean land, and the sojourning southward - with the turning of the axis, the white and yellow races came more into that portion of Egypt, India, Persia and Arabia.

(Q) There was no original projection in upper India? (A) This was a portion rather of the white and the yellow as represented. Let these represent the attributes of the physical, or the senses and what forms they take, rather than calling them white, black, yellow, red and green, etc. What do they signify in the SENSING? Sight, vision - white. Feeling - red. Black - gratifying of appetites in the senses. Yellow - mingling in the hearing. What is the law of the peoples that these represent? Their basic thoughts run to those elements!

There were also other centers that were developing. For in the projections they began as many, and in creating influences they began as five - or in those centers where crystallization or projection had taken on such form as to become what was called man. Hardly could it be said that they were in the exact form as in the present. For there were more of the influences that might be used when necessary; such as arms or limbs or feet or whatnot.

Edgar Cayce On Life and Mankind

"Of the souls which God created—and He created all souls in the beginning; none has been made since—only a comparative few have come into the experience of the solar system, though many have gone through or are going through a similar entitlement in other systems.

A way of escape for the souls which were entangled in matter was prepared. A form was chosen to be a vehicle for the soul on earth, and the way was made for souls to enter earth and experience it as part of their cycle. Of the forms already existing on earth one of the anthropoid apes most nearly approached the necessary pattern. Souls descended on these apes—hovering above and about them rather than inhabiting them—and influenced them to move toward a different goal from the simple one they had been pursuing. They came down out of the trees, built fires, made tools, lived in communities, and began to communicate with each other. Swiftly, even as man measures time, they lost their animal look, shed bodily hair, and took on refinements of manner and habit.

All this was done by the souls, working through glands, until the body of the ape was an objectification—in the third dimension of the solar system—of the soul that hovered above it. Then the soul descended into the body and earth had a new inhabitant: man.

He appeared as a consciousness within an animal, a consciousness which was felt on the earth in five different places in the Caucasus, the Carpathians, and Persia. They yellow race appeared in what is now the Gobi Desert. The black race appeared in the Sudan and upper west Africa; the red race appeared in Atlantis; the brown race appeared in the Andes.

The Pacific coast of South America was then the western coast of Lemuria. The Atlantic seaboard of the United States comprised the lowlands of Atlantis. Persia and the Caucasus were rich lands—the Garden of Eden. The poles of the earth as we know them today were tropical and semitropical. The Nile emptied into the Atlantic Ocean. The Sahara was fertile and inhabited. The Mississippi basin was part of the ocean.

The problem was to overcome the attractions of earth to the extent that the soul would be as free in the body as out of it. Only when the body was no longer a hindrance to the free expression of the soul would the cycle of earth be finished.

Atlantis and Lemuria sank; civilizations rose and fell; man was here a little better, there a little worse. He descended to the depths of earth consciousness, then slowly began to climb back. In earthly seasons it was a long journey from the moment when the first soul, looking down through the trees, saw a violet and wanted to pluck it, to the instant when the last soul should leave its body forever.

At present man is in a state of great spiritual darkness—the darkness which precedes dawn. He has carried his scepticism to the point where it is forcing him to conclusions he know intuitively are wrong. At the same time he has carried his investigation of natural phenomena to the point where it is disproving all it seemed to prove in the beginning. Free will is finding that all roads lead finally to the same destination; Science, theology, and philosophy, having no desire to join forces, are approaching a point of merger. Scepticism faces destruction by its own hand.

Man is at all times the total of what he has been and done, what he has fought and defended, what he has hated and loved. In the three-dimensional consciousness of earth every atom of his physical body is a reflection of his soul—a crystallization of his individuality. His emotional and nervous structures, his mental abilities, his aptitudes, his aversions and preferences, his fears, his follies, his ambition, his character, are the sum of what he has done with his free will since it was given to him. So every personality—the earthly cloak of an individuality—is different from every other personality.

This has been true from the beginning. The first independent thought of each soul was a little different from the first independent thought of every other soul.

So people are different in their likes and dislikes, in their desires and dreams. The law of karma—cause and effect—likewise makes them different in their joys and sorrows, in their handicaps, their strengths, their weaknesses, their virtues and vices, their appreciation of beauty, and their comprehension of truth. Debts incurred in the flesh must be met in the flesh.: natural law, not man or God, demands a eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.

The same law applies to groups of people, as they act together. There is karma for families, for tribes, for races, for nations. When the souls who committed a war return to a nation, a war will be committed upon that nation. Only when defeat is endured by a nation with humility and understanding, only when victory is dispensed by a nation with justice and mercy, will the karma of battle be lifted from them.

Every person’s life is shaped to some extent by karma: his own, that of his associates and loved ones, that of his nation and race, and that of the world itself. But these, singly or together, are not greater than free will. It is what the person does about these influences and urges, how he reacts to them, that makes a difference in his soul development. Because of karma some things are more probable than others, but so long as there is free will anything is possible.

Thus free and predestination coexist in person. His past experiences limit him in probability, and incline him in certain directions, but free will can always draw the sword from the stone.

No soul takes on flesh without a general plan for the experience ahead. The personality expressed through the body is one of many which the individuality might have assumed. Its job is to work on one or several phases of the karma of the individuality. No task is undertaken which is too much for the personality to which it is assigned—or which chooses it. (Some souls choose their own entrances and set their own tasks; others, having made too many mistakes and become dangerously subject to earthly appetites, are sent back by law, at a time and under circumstances best suited to help them.) The task is seldom perfectly fulfilled, and sometimes it is badly neglected.

The general plan for perfecting the individuality in its experience of the solar system then proceeds. Another state of consciousness is assumed, as a trial or as a means of reinforcing the character of a future personality.

So the problems of individualities, the problems of groups, the problems of races and nations, are worked upon time and again until, by free will, they are solved, and the souls go on to other worlds, other systems, other universes."

[DNA]

Posted by Roisin (here)
Did the interbreeding between Neanderthals and Homo Sapiens result in a species more receptive toward the principles of Nazism? Is there a genetic pre-disposition of the resulting hybrid of that combo intellectually embracing that ideology on a mass scale like what we saw happen in Nazis Germany? Is there a demographically larger concentration of hybrids of that kind with a higher percentage of Neanderthal genes in the region of the world where Germany is located resulting in an intense focus of nationalism and race than any other region of the world?
If this is true, I find this very unsettling because German-Americans are America's largest single ethnic group.

I've read in enough places where upon I am unable to easily dismiss the idea that there have been several genetic modifications done to mankind since the initial creation of Homosapians via the Annunaki genetic adaptation of Neanderthals.

Here is the rub.
If it is true that we have been genetically altered several times with the subsequent populations rubbed out if you will, what do you think the reasons are for the modifications?

I don't think the modifications were upgrades in the sense that we were improved upon.
I think the upgrades had to do with limiting our awareness.
I think the upgrades were actually downgrades.
I think these downgrades made mankind less dangerous and more easy to control.

Is anyone familiar with Ingo Swann's book Penetration? It's a pretty good read. If I could boil that book down to one brief statement it would be

That mankind, humankind as we know it is at a distinct disadvantage to those who have a form of telepathy, this telepathy is the ability to read the thoughts of another person and, Ingo states that those with this telepathy also have telepathy+ which is, that they can also insert thoughts and/or emotions into the minds of others as they see fit.

I'm of the opinion that all of mankind had this ability at one time, this telepathy+ but that it was bred out of us by those we mistook for as Gods.

[DNA]

Posted by Wind (here)
Of the forms already existing on earth one of the anthropoid apes most nearly approached the necessary pattern. Souls descended on these apes—hovering above and about them rather than inhabiting them—and influenced them to move toward a different goal from the simple one they had been pursuing.

I love Casey, I really do. And I'm well versed in his creation myth, based on the fact that it is exactly the same as HP Blavatsky's. But I also believe mankind as a whole did not originate on this planet. I vibe with Sitchin and agree with Billy Meier. Both talk of very similar off world roots that jive well with this thread. I've often felt like Casey's creation myth was vague enough that it could very well have been talking about evolution on another planet. Or in this case, the souls guiding the evolution could very well have been the off worlders Sitchin talks about.

Regardless, Casey's work absolutely mentions genetic tinkering.

Have you ever read "Edgar Cayce on Atlantis"? In it Cayce states that the number one cause for the wars that caused the downfall of Atlantis was a disagreement between two sides. The two sides were The Sons of Belial and the Sons of the Law of One. The major argument between these two was over the use of slavery. The Sons of Belial believed it was okay to create automatons, which were part human and part animal slaves.

Edgar Cayce mentions that the priests of Ra, when they arrived in Egypt found the people there a stock of people that were the result of this genetic tinkering and that they went about trying to repair these folks as best they could.

Further, the Cayce work states that there were half human, half animal beings basically the stuff of mythology. Centaurs, Minotaurs, Griffins and a whole host of creatures being the result of the sons of belial who thought it okay to mix animal and human DNA.

Melba Ketchum who has been attacked nonstop for her work on the bigfoot genome came up with some stunning discoveries in 2012. Her work stated that bigfoot was a relatively modern animal, not on archaic human ancestor as many folks have thought. Further, bigfoot is the product of genetic hybridization. Ketchum's work stated that Bigfoot was part animal and part human and only 15,000 years old.

That would put Bigfoot right in the thick of Atlantis. Pretty cool huh?

[Wind]

I haven't made my mind about that subject, not that I really could know. If I remember correctly, the law of one says that we were seeded by some ET races and that is most probably where we come from, meaning the stars, and of course the Creator. It is know that Mars once was full of life and was destroyed, there was this other planet too which is in rubbles now. The more warlike souls incarnated here. I do think that ultimately our souls are extraterrestial anyway... I do believe what Agape is saying, our star being.

Yes, the subject of Atlantis is familiar to me even though I haven't read that book, just several other different books, articles and readings. The Sons of Belial (Baal - Beliar - Beelzebub) were responsible for the moral decay which eventually lead to the downfall. It's very interesting that slavery has existed since those days and The Sons of Law of One opposed such thing, as any sane humane being would. The same struggle seems to have been going on for eons now until these days. Some are still more slaves than others while some have been able to found freedom.

When it comes to all those creatures and etc. It appears that myths really weren't myths, or only some of them were. Since the days of Egypt it's been downhill since the two different factions ruled at different times in different places, they did go to South America too. I'm sure most of us know the story (if you know your history). I would have loved to learn all of this in school, but instead we were told that the human civilization started to develop just after the ice age. What an incredibly silly and mistaken theory. Humanity once used to be in a great place technologically, but especially spiritually. Now we've been slowly climbing out of the hole in which we felll. Why do we fall? So we can learn to pick ourselves up!